/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

PASTEBINS
————–
>Redpills of Zion
http://pastebin.com/MSvkCCRy
>The Jews
http://pastebin.com/TzZC78cp
>The Truth of Races
http://pastebin.com/zapWyu7A
>Holocaust Revisionism
http://pastebin.com/Uc1EkvGZ
>Negroid facts
http://pastebin.com/7wfQE5mD
>Hitler was not a Jew
http://pastebin.com/Rbcx3psi
>Christianity is not Jewish
http://pastebin.com/9cxmXPCB

Refugee reality: Germany admits 75% face long-term unemployment and life on benefits
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/820480/Germany-migrant-crisis-refugees-long-term-unemployment-benefits-Angela-Merkel/amp

Links to archives containing huge amounts of redpills on different issues:
Jews: imgur.com/a/ER090
Economics: imgur.com/a/3IEtU
Women: imgur.com/a/UWtj2
Racial Realism: imgur.com/a/ByCnG
Ethno-nationalism: imgur.com/a/u3ykb
Liberalism: imgur.com/a/AXQFl
Marxism/Communism: imgur.com/a/cS5CR
Media: imgur.com/a/adKzw
Guns: imgur.com/a/EcFxy
Climate change: imgur.com/a/HbKvL
Homosexuals: imgur.com/a/FkHqh
Transsexuals (be warned, painful to look at): imgur.com/a/yj0Nu

https://pastebin.com/ExETH98P

The more liberal someone is, the more likely they are to unjustly discriminate on the basis of politics. Source:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2002636
Conservative psychologists face discrimination that liberals do not notice. Source:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2002636
82% of psychologists are explicitly willing to discriminate against conservatives. Source:http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9945048
The field of psychology is rife with progressive bias and intolerance of conservatives. Source:http://cdp.sagepub.com/content/23/1/27.abstract
Liberals are equally as intolerant as conservatives. Source:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2239819
Conservatives are happier than liberals. Source: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2239819
Liberals consistently underestimate the compassion of conservatives. Source:http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050092
Liberals view themselves as more compassionate than they really are. Source:http://heterodoxacademy.org/2015/09/23/how-marcuse-made-todays-students-less-tolerant-than-their-parents/
Young people who advocate for social justice are less tolerant than their peers. Source:http://heterodoxacademy.org/2015/09/23/how-marcuse-made-todays-students-less-tolerant-than-their-parents/
Conservative and rural Whites are discriminated against in college admissions. Source:http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/opinion/19douthat.html?_r=0
Liberals value the lives of Black people and foreigners more than the lives of White people and Americans. Source:http://www.wired.com/2010/09/kill-whitey-its-the-right-thing-to-do/
72% of American college faculty are liberal, while only 15% are conservative. Source:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8427-2005Mar28.htmlAtelite
American colleges, 87% of faculty identify as liberal. Source:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8427-2005Mar28.html

# Metoo-feminist refused to report when the refugee sex passed her 12-year-old daughter: "He may be expelled"
https://archive.fo/D32sm

list of fake hate crimes
http://fakehatecrimes.org

These are my big three.

And for normies, I think this is the most important infographic.

>>114276
Why is the homosexual redpill the hardest one to swallow

>>114288
You have any good info graphics on what Muslims in America believe?

>>114306
For me it isn’t, I hate fags with a passion, but most people won’t accept it because someone in their family is gay or they're gay, people need to realise it’s a mental illness spread by the Jews for the destruction of tradition and the destruction of the white race

>>114334
Based Aussie bro.
I am sick to death of faggots.
My friends and I don't even do fake gay banter anymore, too much in media makes it unfunny now.

>>114273
About he Holocaust.
Pic 1 is a soldier treating prisoners with gas to kill lice
Pic2 is pretty obvious
Pic3 is prisoners working at the camp

>>114372
Buck, they got mixed up
Pic 1 is something about lice &
Pic 2 Is the gate people claim zyklon B came from. (I must point out that the gas released by zyklon B is lighter than air so it would be plain dumb to throw pellets of zyklon B from the roof to the floor)

>holocaust deniers are serious
o my sides

>>114273
And in the end you use Pastebin, which requires a Google captcha verification which isn't the smart thing to do.

The Kool Kidz Klub recommends u.teknik.io

>>114518
The official narrative dissolves under scrutiny. I used to accept it on faith before I decided to assemble a list of hard incontrovertible forensic evidence to btfo deniers on /pol/. I couldn't find any forensic evidence that proved the existence of a mass murder program. Survivor testimony was often contradictory. The Nuremberg trials were a disgrace to legal systems everywhere. German officers who admitted to the crimes did so under duress. Frequently their testicles were found to have been crushed. The harder that I look at the Holocaust, the more it seems like the camps were nothing more than ordinary interment camps like the ones that most every nation used to control dissdents during the war.

>>114629
>Survivor testimony was often contradictory.
And anecdotal, but convenient to dismiss (along with testimony during the trials) if it doesn't agree with your presupposition.

>The Nuremberg trials were a disgrace to legal systems everywhere. German officers who admitted to the crimes did so under duress. Frequently their testicles were found to have been crushed.

Were they ALL tortured into confessing to heinous crimes which they supposedly did not commit? Hundreds testified regarding the Holocaust over the span of decades.

Many of these Nazis testified as witnesses and were not accused of crimes. What was the basis for their supposed coercion?

Many of these trials were in German courts. Did the Germans torture their own countrymen?

Have any of these supposed torture victims come forth to support the claim that testimony was coerced?

What coercion could have convinced Judge Konrad Morgen to testify to the crimes he witnessed at the International Nuremberg Trial in 1946, where he was not accused of any crime?

What coercion was applied to SS Doctor Johann Kremer to make him testify in his own defense in 1947, and then, after having been convicted in both Poland and Germany, emerge after his release to testify again as a witness at the Frankfurt trial?

What coercion was applied to Böck, Gerhard Hess, Hölblinger, Storch, and Wiebeck, all former SS men, all witnesses at Frankfurt, none accused of any crime there?

Many wartime documents, not postwar descriptions, specifically regarding gassings and other atrocities, were seized by the U.S. armed forces. Are these all fakes?

Why would the Nazi's destroy and bury the interment camps if they were only used for such?

>>114629
Also…
>I couldn't find any forensic evidence that proved the existence of a mass murder program.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=holocaust+mass+graves

>>114651
Oh look, the alleged grave sites where excavation or non-intrusive lidar techniques have failed to account for the alleged millions of dead.

Try harder.

>>114677
uh… because they were cremated.

>>114677
Not to mention you're literally jumping from "Holocaust didn't happen" to "not as many were killed as reported." Which is it? Do you have a consistent position?

This video is breathtaking:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7YzrbeLbJE

All of the founding fathers were white nationalists and the United States was white nationalist (white immigrants only) from 1790 - 1952.

>>114681
I don't know about anon but i do have a possition; The holocaust is glorified.
Not only the 'memorial' from auswitch was silently switched from 4 million to 1.5 million (Red cross number of confirmed deaths in concentration camps is 271.307, not every one of those 207.000 is jewish..)
>pic related
but there's also clear proof of how the life on camps was not as hellish as people make it to be, how the number of jew citizens didn't drastically go down as it should since more than 80% of the jewish population should have been killed if the holocaust was real, and generally there's a lot of forged images, fake claims and miss information spread everywhere.
Damn, its a crime to deny the holocaust in some countries, there's clearly something fishy happening and the goverment is trying it's hardest to keep all of this hidden.
Because if the truth about the holocaust where to ever surface, that would make for a huge conflict, people don't like to be deceived and this might be the biggest cover up in all of history.

>>114865
>Not only the 'memorial' from auswitch was silently switched from 4 million to 1.5 million
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/06/17/world/poland-agrees-to-change-auschwitz-tablets.html
"It was previously thought that four million died at the camps. More recent research has revealed the figure to be closer to 1.5 million."
Jesus christ, how hard to you have to nitpick? Even so, the number on the plaque is irrelevant to what actually happened.

>(Red cross number of confirmed deaths in concentration camps is 271.307, not every one of those 207.000 is jewish..)
>confirmed deaths
What about unconfirmed deaths? What is cherry picking?

>but there's also clear proof of how the life on camps was not as hellish as people make it to be, how the number of jew citizens didn't drastically go down as it should since more than 80% of the jewish population should have been killed if the holocaust was real, and generally there's a lot of forged images, fake claims and miss information spread everywhere.
What is the basis of this? Can you elaborate?

>Damn, its a crime to deny the holocaust in some countries, there's clearly something fishy happening and the goverment is trying it's hardest to keep all of this hidden.
Like the German government/military attempted to keep the existence of camps hidden?

>>114868
>Jesus christ, how hard to you have to nitpick? Even so, the number on the plaque is irrelevant to what actually happened.
Not an argument.
You should know pretty well that such an error is not "nitpick" but an important evidence of how people tend to exaggerate this event, you should take into account that this number takes into account both dead by lice, executions, accidents and every single dead possible, not just executions.
>What about unconfirmed deaths?
We are talking about a military institution of the WW2, not an Islamic terrorist group, both the officers in charge of the camp and the general had to have records of every single dead in the camps.
Plus, the red Cross also had records of deads whitin the camps.
Again, cherry picking does not apply here, claiming such thing is useless when we are obviously talking about the numbers of deads and official documents.
>Like the German government/military attempted to keep the existence of camps hidden?
You mean 1940~45'? Because the camps where discovered around that time.
Plus, there where countless attempts from Hitler to send the Jews out of Germany, they weren't really succeful, it was quite obvious these guys would be sent to work camps in such case.
Ah and let's not forget all those times when Germany was bombarded, destroying important roads used to deliver supplies to the camps.
>What is the basis of this? Can you elaborate?
When I get home I'll give you some sources and examples, I have little to nothing here and this stuff is hard to get, it almost would seem as if ((someone)) was hiding information.
Just by reading some books about the Holocaust survivors you can have a taste for now.

>>114273
Ww2 redpill
https://youtu.be/27UvzDRiLAc

>>114868
can you not even do basic math?

>>114888
>>114885
>You should know pretty well that such an error is not "nitpick" but an important evidence of how people tend to exaggerate this event, you should take into account that this number takes into account both dead by lice, executions, accidents and every single dead possible, not just executions.
Its interesting that you now mention that there were executions, how were they carried out?

>We are talking about a military institution of the WW2, not an Islamic terrorist group, both the officers in charge of the camp and the general had to have records of every single dead in the camps.
Just like the Turks kept track of all the Armenians they killed? Why would you be keeping track of your genocide victims?

>Plus, the red Cross also had records of deads whitin the camps. Again, cherry picking does not apply here, claiming such thing is useless when we are obviously talking about the numbers of deads and official documents.
how they would have even been able to accurately obtain such statistics given that that they had very limited access to the camps, and only towards the end of the war? How can you count dead bodies when they've been burned to ashes and dumped?


>>114888
Nice get, but…
Do you seriously think a mass body cremation system would even be closely similar to a commercial one? Do you think they used the same kind of ovens, with the same sort of care for the remains? This also fails to recognize that many bodies weren't burned in the ovens, but in pits. How vapid.
Also, weren't you all saying that the holocaust didn't even happen? Why would you argue about crematory furnace capacity if it never happened in the first place?

Also, the first image doesn't even list sources, for all you know it is just as 'made up' as the holocaust.

Not to mention…
>(Red cross number of confirmed deaths in concentration camps is 271.307, not every one of those 207.000 is jewish..)
>Toal deaths: over 587,000

>"…the 'memorial' from auswitch was silently switched from 4 million to 1.5 million."

Let that irony sink in.

>>114644
>Many of these trials were in German courts. Did the Germans torture their own countrymen?

Why the hell would the Allies let the Germans conduct a war crimes trial against their own countrymen when it was the Germans who lost the war? This alone is enough to make just about anyone question your logic.

>>114906
Not all holocaust trials were conducted during the Nuremburg trials. If you took 5 seconds to google you would know that.

>>114912
Question still stands: why would the Allies let the Germans run their own war crimes trails?

>>114905
no I think cremation ovens available to the nazis in the 30s would have taken even longer than modern ones, making the 6 million claim even less believable. These were work camps not death camps and the reason for the gas and the cremations was merely to prevent disease. Auswitch is listed as a death camp, the 587,000 is just for the concentration camps.

the reason you're struggling with this is because you can't manage basic mathmatics or basic reading comprehension

>>114940
Let's call a spade a spade. Auswitch was a maximum security prison, designed for the worst and most despicable. These were the prisoners who were impossible to integrate into society and unwilling to contribute in any meaningful way. One would find no different in any max-security prison today.

>>114943
sure but it wasn't a "death camp," no "extermination campaign" took place, and no where near 6 million kikes were killed.

>>114988
The Alternative Hypothesis is who alt-pilled me. The alt-right has no-one as good as he. Pure data-crunching.

>>114273
Can someone provide me with a big screencap of the thread, about that civil war in germany, started by jews? I once saw it on 4ch, and I can tell you, that this is actually one of the most effective, not subjective, but fact-proven redpills, which I ever gave to anyone, when discussing why jews weren't so fluffy and innocent in Germany back then.