>>111476Yes. While contraception could lead to more promiscuity, having fewer children born from couples unable to properly care for them is ultimately beneficial to society.
>>111478But the very poor can't afford contraception. Worse in poor countries children are a needed labor and pension plan, even more important, when child mortality is high, they will have more children to route around those deaths. In contrast the rich functional societies stop having children so they can play more vidya.
Planned Parenthood gives contraception to poor white people. It also gives misinformation to poor white people about how DANGEROUS and RISKY and PAINFUL and POTENTIALLY FATAL having children can be. It encourages women of childbearing age to slut around instead of settling down and having kids. It encourages women to have sex with no strings attached, no emotional bonds or real relationships or dopamine.
Meanwhile, the same liberal billionaires that fund Planned Parenthood and ensure it gets government funding as a "Charitable Organization" fund "Pograms" that pay black women for each kid they have.
Contraception is good, but it's used as a stick to beat conservatives with for finding the left's excessive abortion morally distasteful.
>>111484> the very poor can't afford contraceptionThe very poor want a lot of children so they can get gibs from goverment, chidren are also a tool for survival in very poor places.
Also, contraception is as easy as a punch in the stomach too, so there's that.
Really, i don't think this will have any impact on society, maybe some more children will be born but don't expect a meaningful impact.
>>111494>Meanwhile, the same liberal billionaires that fund Planned Parenthood and ensure it gets government funding as a "Charitable Organization" fund "Pograms" that pay black women for each kid they have.I'm completely opposed to this shit. The taxpayer should not be footing the bill for these nigglets. If you're going to breed, then start a family. The government shouldn't be replacing the father in the family. We should be gutting welfare and supporting the family unit again.
>>111476While contraception has its clear and obvious uses, people cannot be trusted to use them for the right reasons. Current dating culture in the west being the biggest, most flamboyant, most heinous misuse of contraception and abortion out there, while use in an established marriage between two partners expressing their love for one another through sexual intercourse without having to worry about conceiving represents the moral use.
So yes I suppose, but for the right reasons, but surprise surprise you can't trust people with their own freedom. The worst people are always gonna drag down the best people to be just as debased and soulless as them. We live in a free society, the major fault with this is that it invites problems like these with no real way to deal with them in totality without infringing that freedom.
Which is more important.. freedom or culture?
>>111476>Which has priority? The individual or the community?Its a balancing act that depends on the external forces and internal ones. When the people are good and the world is stable then a justice leader should give them anarchy for their loyal services.
But when the people degenerate or the nation's sovereignty is questioned then a good leader will strip the people of their anarchy in an attempt to fix the problem.
The only way we can fix what has happened today is if we either have a leader who is willing to execute (((those))) in academia and the media and then establish a military backed monarchy to ensure this never happens again. That or the day of the rope where we execute (((them))) ourselves.
>>111519Can't read an image made for ants.
Contraception should begin and end with self restraint. Maybe a condom.
>>111476no, women should be held responsible for their actions and decisions. It'll also put more pressure on people to get married if they want to have sex
>>111527what's up with this dirt quality picture with no citation?
>>111858I agree with the leaf on this one. He's based.