/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/


Archived thread


1516333310963.jpg
Anonymous
????
?
No.107877
107890 107904 107905
http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/01/18/sean-hannity-monologue-memo-fisa-surveillance-shows-abuse-power-bigger-watergate

>In his opening monologue Thursday night, Sean Hannity called for Special Counsel Robert Mueller to end his "witch hunt" following new revelations about U.S. government FISA surveillance abuses.


>He pointed to a four-page memo circulating in Congress that allegedly reveals FISA abuses within the Department of Justice and FBI, which has been described by lawmakers as “shocking,” “troubling” and “alarming.”


>"Our sources are telling us that the abuse of power is far bigger than Watergate," Hannity said. "Remember, Watergate was a third-rate break-in. What we're talking about tonight is the systematic abuse of power, the weaponizing of those powerful tools of intelligence and the shredding of our Fourth Amendment constitutional rights."


>He explained that it's an enormous abuse of power that the infamous anti-Trump dossier was used by the FBI to secure FISA warrants on Trump associates.


>He said the dossier was clearly salacious and full of "fake news," but that didn't stop DOJ and FBI officials from using it to spy on a presidential campaign and an incoming president.


>"This is far worse than Watergate. This is an abuse of surveillance and intelligence to win an election. It is a massive abuse of power, and it was all done by just a few people who think and thought they knew better than you about who should be the president of the United States," Hannity said. "It is the biggest national scandal by far in our lifetime."


>"The special counsel, Robert Mueller, and his band of Democratic witch hunters never should have been appointed and they need to be disbanded immediately."


The Plan: Get shitlibs to retweet pics like the following to get the FISA memo released.
Anonymous
????
?
No.107890
107903
>>107877
this is pretty good shit, even the shills on /pol/ are thinking its real and its a psyop psyop or some shit
Anonymous
????
?
No.107903
>>107890
Beautiful
Anonymous
????
?
No.107904
>>107877
I am beaming with gleeful joy awaiting the reveals. Just wonder if the Government Shutdown will be used in an effort to bury the news about this.
Anonymous
????
?
No.107905
>>107877
This is a good idea.
Anonymous
????
?
No.107946
108443
1516347363614.jpg

Anonymous
????
?
No.108437

>>108436 →
Anonymous
????
?
No.108443
108490
eee1.jpg
>>107946
>dreamers

Not dreamers. ILLEGALS, you moron !
Stop calling ILLEGALS "DREAMERS". Or I'm gonna bring you back to reality with a kick on the bum, you socialist freak!

All I see is a guy who's doing his job of president, and doing it right.
Anonymous
????
?
No.108446
108449 108452 108456
GCHQ-Top-Secret-Memo-Susan….jpg
Is this a part of the memo?
Source: http://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news/world-news/1937-proof-british-intelligence-spied-on-donald-trump-at-the-direct-request-of-president-barack-obama-and-a-later-renewed-request-by-susan-rice
Anonymous
????
?
No.108449
>>108446
And here is a link including that page and 3 other related pages making 4 pages.
https://onsizzle.com/i/top-secret-strap3-sigint-uk-eyes-only-a3a-hubble-road-20298759
Anonymous
????
?
No.108452
108456 108595
>>108446
Holy shit that can't be real
Anonymous
????
?
No.108456
>>108446
>>108452
I really hope it is shown to be real. It would mean jail time for Obama (unless he flee the country).
Anonymous
????
?
No.108490
>>108443
this tbh, their dream is our nightmare and in both cases it's time to wake up.
Anonymous
????
?
No.108595
>>108452
The source is questionable but also >>108457 →
Anonymous
????
?
No.108599
108601
Qs4S0atm3XQz83LfdIIjXDbzKp….jpg
>Dave Joyce Verified account @RepDaveJoyce 16h16 hours ago

>I had the opportunity to read the classified report relating the FBI, FISA & possible Russian collusion in the 2016 elections. What I read was truly disturbing. I have always advocated for more transparency, which is why I joined 40+ colleagues signing a letter to #ReleaseTheMemo


>Great news! Our efforts to #ReleaseTheMemo have been effective and the HPSIC plans to begin the process to release the FBI/FISA/Russia memo. This may take up to 19+ Congressional work days but Americans deserve to know the truth.


https://twitter.com/repdavejoyce
Anonymous
????
?
No.108601
108604
>>108599
Why not just release it? I understand a day or two to have it signed or whatever but 19 days? Really? Enough time to shut it down.
Bureaucrats need to hang.
Anonymous
????
?
No.108602
gop-image-2.jpg
gop-request-1.jpg
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/official-gop-lawmakers-request-release-classified-explosive-fisa-memo/
Anonymous
????
?
No.108604
>>108601
Perhaps this explains why:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/20/house-intelligence-committee-will-vote-to-release-fisa-corruption-memo/#more-144795
Anonymous
????
?
No.108627
108631
rs.png
YOU RUSSIAN BOT FAGGOTS NEED TO STOP INTERFERING IN THE US ELECTIONS! JUST STOP IT!

See: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/release-the-memo-whats-the-conspiracy-behind-the-right-wing-meme-w515654
Anonymous
????
?
No.108630
108637
065b8ffd41a9dada8b6ab4f392….png

Anonymous
????
?
No.108631
>>108627
сука блять
Anonymous
????
?
No.108637
108647
>>108630
Jesus they are pushing hard. But I wonder if they are redpilling some centrist too. People genuinely want to see the memo, and accusing them of being used by Russians might make them think if the whole Russia angle was wrong from the beginning. Only reason to hide the memo is because they don't want people to see it; which have a tendency to make people want to see it even more. But then again it is leftists we are talking about, and who they are targeting with this campaign or "Muh Russia", so they might succeed in brainwashing their supporters.

But most importantly, since when did the media not want to see "classified" information? If the media wasn't controlled opposition they would jump at the chance of pushing for transparency.
Anonymous
????
?
No.108647
108650
>>108637
If victory ever comes, I suggest we should all get Russian flags for a day.
Anonymous
????
?
No.108650
>>108647
That would be fun.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109642
we-the-russian-bots.jpg

Anonymous
????
?
No.109673
ca8b84a81891daddf27621422d….jpg

Anonymous
????
?
No.109783
The Internet vs Legacy Media:
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/955830690381254659
See the comments.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109804
FUFZ6Tv1peX_gIJnDvaDg-jhmM….jpg

Anonymous
????
?
No.109912
109961 109963
Infowars_memo.png
>Infowars
Alex Jones has released what he claims to be a redacted copy of the MEMO.

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=7Jgkk90XtRc
Anonymous
????
?
No.109961
109963
>>109912
False. That document is a publicly available document:
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf
Anonymous
????
?
No.109963
>>109912
>>109961
Here is Wikipedia refering to that document:
>On May 24, 2017, a declassified FISA report[27][28] marked "Top Secret" was published, noting that the NSA routinely violated the 4th Amendment of Americans and abused intelligence tools to do so. The Obama administration apparently self-disclosed the problems at a closed-door hearing on Oct. 26 before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, two weeks before the 2016 election. The report labeled the matter a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue," citing an "institutional lack of candor" on the part of the administration. It also criticized the NSA as having “disregard” for rules and “deficient” oversight.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_on_mass_surveillance#cite_ref-27

[27] is my link.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109967
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAC7vFySkOk
Anonymous
????
?
No.109978
>The online groundswell urging the release of House Republicans’ attacks on the Federal Bureau of Investigation appears thus far to be organically American—not Russian propaganda, a source familiar with Twitter’s internal analysis told The Daily Beast.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/source-twitter-pins-releasethememo-on-republicans-not-russia
Anonymous
????
?
No.110020
nf1Eb_uVL1cXJfw6gOCsQegV85….jpg

Anonymous
????
?
No.110041
I love how these kikes care now when its fake, but when (((Obama))) did it for real no one batted a fucking eye.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110077
Poor FBI! They need to now join the #releasethememo campaign!

Quote:

>The fighting has strained the relationship between the bureau and Capitol Hill Republicans for months, culminating in a rare public statement from the FBI confirming they had requested, and been denied access to, the memo. Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) on Tuesday called the relationship “rocky,” saying “2016 and 2017 haven’t been good years for [the Justice Department] and FBI.”

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/370412-gop-feud-with-fbi-ratchets-up
Anonymous
????
?
No.110176
110178
images.duckduckgo.com.jpg
>A top Justice Department official is urging House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes not to release a much-buzzed-about memo circulating in Congress that purportedly reveals government surveillance abuses.

>In the letter, which Fox News has obtained, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote, “We believe it would be extraordinarily reckless for the Committee to disclose such information publicly without giving the Department and the FBI the opportunity to review the memorandum and to advise the HPSCI of the risk of harm to national security and to ongoing investigations that could come from public release.”


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/24/doj-official-urges-nunes-not-to-release-memo-on-surveillance-abuses.html
Anonymous
????
?
No.110178
110184
>>110176
on a related note, it really isn't fair for police to just barge in and search a drug dealer's home without giving him adequate warning and time to flush his drugs.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110184
>>110178
kek
Anonymous
????
?
No.110369
110371 110379
r3DKqBxFeVnffwA-90h-gC3mCv….jpg
It's spreading…
Anonymous
????
?
No.110371
110374 110377 110699
>>110369
Who is q? Im in the dark.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110374
110378
>>110371
Q is a "LARPer" who originated on 4chan claiming insider information and left a bucketload of cryptic clues. The posts also seemed to include codes for initiating covert activities. Many people on 4chan tried to imitate and disrupt Q threads. The cryptic posts convinced many that Q had pre-knowledge based on synchronicities with Trump tweets. Photos also imply he is associated with the White House. None of these are overwhelmingly convincing alone, but the sheer continuation of synchronicities caused Q to develope a following. Q migrated to 8chan and problems again occurred especially the attempt to hack their tripcode. This resulted in Q arranging to get his own board that only they can post in: https://8ch.net/greatawakening/catalog.html . I use the term they because a person called Zack was on Alex Jones (yeh, I know) claiming to be one of the 4 Qs. Q has gone to some trouble to obtain using 1 tripcode from multiple devices.

The summary of Q posts/claims is at: https://qcodefag.github.io/

You won't find a smoking gun, what you will find is his posts correlate with events and as the US situation ramps up so does Q doubledown on the claims and insuations they are associated with the White House.

See the pen at >>110073 → which is a color shifting and flip of the lasted Q post shown at the above link.

Q claims : "We haven’t started the drops re: human trafficking / sacrifices [yet][worst]."
Anonymous
????
?
No.110377
110378 110379
>>110371
I should also mention Q has mobilised chan autist to make and store up thousands of memes. Q is advising them that their job is to help normies cope with the future dark revelations. The research and meme generation is here: https://8ch.net/qresearch/catalog.html#

Literal weaponized autism from a seemingly White House related insider. This might be bigger than the Great Meme War.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110378
>>110377
>>110374
Seems like (((they))) have something to do with this.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110379
>>110369
Nice, when the real media starts quoting him we have reached the next level.

>>110377
I agree that this will be bigger than the Great Meme War. In the Meme War "we" got an President elected, and won a battle against TNWO. This is about dismantling and destroy the new world order.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110388
110434
Ball is rolling.

>A controversial Republican memo alleging surveillance abuse specifically names FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein along with former FBI Director James Comey.


>Capitol Hill sources on both sides of the aisle say the memo’s release is only a matter of time. And when it comes out, these current and former officials — all GOP bêtes noires — are likely to face even more criticism from the right over their involvement in FBI counterintelligence work.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/doj-warns-that-releasethememo-would-be-extraordinarily-reckless

The wheel is turning!!
Anonymous
????
?
No.110402
110433
1Hk26wREpq-1hnJ4oxSNHZbDCf….png

Anonymous
????
?
No.110433
110435
>>110402
>the first black president might be going to jail
>we therefore have to keep his crimes from being exposed so it doesn't happen
>BLM
Their blatant lack of self-awareness legitimately cracks me up sometimes.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110434
>>110388
Also, checked.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110435
>>110433
The negro is easily manipulated by the jew. Thats why they take to communism so well.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110614
110666
lcuGkaJ.jpg
New memo leak claim:
https://imgur.com/a/vMg5Y
Source not known.
Anonymous
????
?
No.110666
110671
>>110614
Source is: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20to%20FBI%20(Strzok%20Page%20Texts%20-%20Clinton%20Conflict,%20Special%20Counsel,%20Records%20Alienation).pdf
Anonymous
????
?
No.110671
110679
>>110666
Check

Also if it is an doc on the gov open net won't it indicate that it isn't the memo in question as it is currently is graded secret?
Anonymous
????
?
No.110679
110692
>>110671
I am not sure what is going on. Logic would support you. How do we find out what the FISA memo should have? I think it needs to show spying on Trump, and this doesn't. ??
Anonymous
????
?
No.110692
>>110679
I agree. The way the republicans that have seen it talk about it I think it won't be "we need to look into" and wording with reservations attached. I think the memo will offer some proof of wrongdoing.
Also the date on the memo is yesterday, and the memo in question is four pages as I understand it. But this document might well contain lots of what the FISA memo will contain, but more loosely worded. Like a prelude to an legal case or congressional hearing (or what the course of action will be).
Anonymous
????
?
No.110699
>>110371
Just found this FAQ
https://8ch.net/qtip/res/1.html#1
Anonymous
????
?
No.110714
More claims.. two pages of Strzok's texts:
https://www.scribd.com/document/369815742/Strzok-Page-Text-Messages-5-19-17
Anonymous
????
?
No.110979
110980

>That’s perhaps the weirdest example of journalistic ethical juxtaposition in the past few months. Again, “sources say” now appears to be reporter Devlin Barrett writing an article based on direct information from Lisa Page and Peter Strzok who were the subjects of the story. Obviously they would have a vested legal interest in shaping/spinning that story in a very specific direction.

Knowing that DOJ/FBI Attorney Lisa Page and FBI Agent Peter Strzok were key sources for Barrett’s stories at the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post, you can go through all of his old articles at both publications and clearly identify stories were Strzok and Page were leaking to him.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/26/controversial-fbi-officials-linked-to-wall-street-journal-and-washington-post-leaks/

Hahaha. Will the FBI survive??
Anonymous
????
?
No.110980
>>110979
Includes 7 pages of texts:
https://www.scribd.com/document/370009743/Grassley-Text-Message-Release-1-25-18
Anonymous
????
?
No.110997
>“One more thing: she might be our next president,” Page texted Strzok on Feb. 25, 2016, in the midst of the presidential campaign, in reference to Clinton.

>“The last thing you need [is] going in there loaded for bear,” she continued. “You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more [DOJ] than [FBI]?”

>Strzok replied that he “agreed” and he had relayed their discussion with someone named “Bill.”


>Strzok not only worked on the Clinton case, but was assigned to the special counsel’s probe into Russia and the Trump campaign after a number of anti-Trump texts were discovered on his phone. Page also briefly worked on the special counsel investigation.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/25/fbi-officials-worried-about-being-too-tough-on-hillary-clinton-during-email-investigation-texts-show.html
Anonymous
????
?
No.111151

>The Daily Beast has learned that Hill Republicans are gearing up to use an obscure parliamentary rule to release it.

http://dennismichaellynch.com/memo-fisa-document-names-comey-rosenstein-and-mccabe/
;