/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>107877
this is pretty good shit, even the shills on /pol/ are thinking its real and its a psyop psyop or some shit

>>107890
Beautiful

>>107877
I am beaming with gleeful joy awaiting the reveals. Just wonder if the Government Shutdown will be used in an effort to bury the news about this.

>>107877
This is a good idea.

>>107946
>dreamers

Not dreamers. ILLEGALS, you moron !
Stop calling ILLEGALS "DREAMERS". Or I'm gonna bring you back to reality with a kick on the bum, you socialist freak!

All I see is a guy who's doing his job of president, and doing it right.

Is this a part of the memo?
Source: http://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news/world-news/1937-proof-british-intelligence-spied-on-donald-trump-at-the-direct-request-of-president-barack-obama-and-a-later-renewed-request-by-susan-rice

>>108446
And here is a link including that page and 3 other related pages making 4 pages.
https://onsizzle.com/i/top-secret-strap3-sigint-uk-eyes-only-a3a-hubble-road-20298759

>>108446
Holy shit that can't be real

>>108446
>>108452
I really hope it is shown to be real. It would mean jail time for Obama (unless he flee the country).

>>108443
this tbh, their dream is our nightmare and in both cases it's time to wake up.

>>108452
The source is questionable but also >>108457 →

>Dave Joyce Verified account @RepDaveJoyce 16h16 hours ago

>I had the opportunity to read the classified report relating the FBI, FISA & possible Russian collusion in the 2016 elections. What I read was truly disturbing. I have always advocated for more transparency, which is why I joined 40+ colleagues signing a letter to #ReleaseTheMemo

>Great news! Our efforts to #ReleaseTheMemo have been effective and the HPSIC plans to begin the process to release the FBI/FISA/Russia memo. This may take up to 19+ Congressional work days but Americans deserve to know the truth.
…
https://twitter.com/repdavejoyce

>>108599
Why not just release it? I understand a day or two to have it signed or whatever but 19 days? Really? Enough time to shut it down.
Bureaucrats need to hang.

>>108601
Perhaps this explains why:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/20/house-intelligence-committee-will-vote-to-release-fisa-corruption-memo/#more-144795

YOU RUSSIAN BOT FAGGOTS NEED TO STOP INTERFERING IN THE US ELECTIONS! JUST STOP IT!

See: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/release-the-memo-whats-the-conspiracy-behind-the-right-wing-meme-w515654

>>108627
сука блять

>>108630
Jesus they are pushing hard. But I wonder if they are redpilling some centrist too. People genuinely want to see the memo, and accusing them of being used by Russians might make them think if the whole Russia angle was wrong from the beginning. Only reason to hide the memo is because they don't want people to see it; which have a tendency to make people want to see it even more. But then again it is leftists we are talking about, and who they are targeting with this campaign or "Muh Russia", so they might succeed in brainwashing their supporters.

But most importantly, since when did the media not want to see "classified" information? If the media wasn't controlled opposition they would jump at the chance of pushing for transparency.

>>108637
If victory ever comes, I suggest we should all get Russian flags for a day.

>>108647
That would be fun.

The Internet vs Legacy Media:
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/955830690381254659
See the comments.

>Infowars
Alex Jones has released what he claims to be a redacted copy of the MEMO.

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=7Jgkk90XtRc

>>109912
False. That document is a publicly available document:
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf

>>109912
>>109961
Here is Wikipedia refering to that document:
>On May 24, 2017, a declassified FISA report[27][28] marked "Top Secret" was published, noting that the NSA routinely violated the 4th Amendment of Americans and abused intelligence tools to do so. The Obama administration apparently self-disclosed the problems at a closed-door hearing on Oct. 26 before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, two weeks before the 2016 election. The report labeled the matter a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue," citing an "institutional lack of candor" on the part of the administration. It also criticized the NSA as having “disregard” for rules and “deficient” oversight.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_on_mass_surveillance#cite_ref-27

[27] is my link.

I love how these kikes care now when its fake, but when (((Obama))) did it for real no one batted a fucking eye.

Poor FBI! They need to now join the #releasethememo campaign!

Quote:
…
>The fighting has strained the relationship between the bureau and Capitol Hill Republicans for months, culminating in a rare public statement from the FBI confirming they had requested, and been denied access to, the memo. Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) on Tuesday called the relationship “rocky,” saying “2016 and 2017 haven’t been good years for [the Justice Department] and FBI.”
…
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/370412-gop-feud-with-fbi-ratchets-up

>A top Justice Department official is urging House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes not to release a much-buzzed-about memo circulating in Congress that purportedly reveals government surveillance abuses.

>In the letter, which Fox News has obtained, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote, “We believe it would be extraordinarily reckless for the Committee to disclose such information publicly without giving the Department and the FBI the opportunity to review the memorandum and to advise the HPSCI of the risk of harm to national security and to ongoing investigations that could come from public release.”
…
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/24/doj-official-urges-nunes-not-to-release-memo-on-surveillance-abuses.html

>>110176
on a related note, it really isn't fair for police to just barge in and search a drug dealer's home without giving him adequate warning and time to flush his drugs.

>>110178
kek

It's spreading…

>>110369
Who is q? Im in the dark.

>>110371
Q is a "LARPer" who originated on 4chan claiming insider information and left a bucketload of cryptic clues. The posts also seemed to include codes for initiating covert activities. Many people on 4chan tried to imitate and disrupt Q threads. The cryptic posts convinced many that Q had pre-knowledge based on synchronicities with Trump tweets. Photos also imply he is associated with the White House. None of these are overwhelmingly convincing alone, but the sheer continuation of synchronicities caused Q to develope a following. Q migrated to 8chan and problems again occurred especially the attempt to hack their tripcode. This resulted in Q arranging to get his own board that only they can post in: https://8ch.net/greatawakening/catalog.html . I use the term they because a person called Zack was on Alex Jones (yeh, I know) claiming to be one of the 4 Qs. Q has gone to some trouble to obtain using 1 tripcode from multiple devices.

The summary of Q posts/claims is at: https://qcodefag.github.io/

You won't find a smoking gun, what you will find is his posts correlate with events and as the US situation ramps up so does Q doubledown on the claims and insuations they are associated with the White House.

See the pen at >>110073 → which is a color shifting and flip of the lasted Q post shown at the above link.

Q claims : "We haven’t started the drops re: human trafficking / sacrifices [yet][worst]."

>>110371
I should also mention Q has mobilised chan autist to make and store up thousands of memes. Q is advising them that their job is to help normies cope with the future dark revelations. The research and meme generation is here: https://8ch.net/qresearch/catalog.html#

Literal weaponized autism from a seemingly White House related insider. This might be bigger than the Great Meme War.

>>110377
>>110374
Seems like (((they))) have something to do with this.

>>110369
Nice, when the real media starts quoting him we have reached the next level.

>>110377
I agree that this will be bigger than the Great Meme War. In the Meme War "we" got an President elected, and won a battle against TNWO. This is about dismantling and destroy the new world order.

Ball is rolling.

>A controversial Republican memo alleging surveillance abuse specifically names FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein along with former FBI Director James Comey.

>Capitol Hill sources on both sides of the aisle say the memo’s release is only a matter of time. And when it comes out, these current and former officials — all GOP bêtes noires — are likely to face even more criticism from the right over their involvement in FBI counterintelligence work.
…
https://www.thedailybeast.com/doj-warns-that-releasethememo-would-be-extraordinarily-reckless

The wheel is turning!!

>>110402
>the first black president might be going to jail
>we therefore have to keep his crimes from being exposed so it doesn't happen
>BLM
Their blatant lack of self-awareness legitimately cracks me up sometimes.

>>110388
Also, checked.

>>110433
The negro is easily manipulated by the jew. Thats why they take to communism so well.

New memo leak claim:
https://imgur.com/a/vMg5Y
Source not known.

>>110614
Source is: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20to%20FBI%20(Strzok%20Page%20Texts%20-%20Clinton%20Conflict,%20Special%20Counsel,%20Records%20Alienation).pdf

>>110666
Check

Also if it is an doc on the gov open net won't it indicate that it isn't the memo in question as it is currently is graded secret?

>>110671
I am not sure what is going on. Logic would support you. How do we find out what the FISA memo should have? I think it needs to show spying on Trump, and this doesn't. ??

>>110679
I agree. The way the republicans that have seen it talk about it I think it won't be "we need to look into" and wording with reservations attached. I think the memo will offer some proof of wrongdoing.
Also the date on the memo is yesterday, and the memo in question is four pages as I understand it. But this document might well contain lots of what the FISA memo will contain, but more loosely worded. Like a prelude to an legal case or congressional hearing (or what the course of action will be).

>>110371
Just found this FAQ
https://8ch.net/qtip/res/1.html#1

More claims.. two pages of Strzok's texts:
https://www.scribd.com/document/369815742/Strzok-Page-Text-Messages-5-19-17

…
>That’s perhaps the weirdest example of journalistic ethical juxtaposition in the past few months. Again, “sources say” now appears to be reporter Devlin Barrett writing an article based on direct information from Lisa Page and Peter Strzok who were the subjects of the story. Obviously they would have a vested legal interest in shaping/spinning that story in a very specific direction.

Knowing that DOJ/FBI Attorney Lisa Page and FBI Agent Peter Strzok were key sources for Barrett’s stories at the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post, you can go through all of his old articles at both publications and clearly identify stories were Strzok and Page were leaking to him.
…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/26/controversial-fbi-officials-linked-to-wall-street-journal-and-washington-post-leaks/

Hahaha. Will the FBI survive??

>>110979
Includes 7 pages of texts:
https://www.scribd.com/document/370009743/Grassley-Text-Message-Release-1-25-18

>“One more thing: she might be our next president,” Page texted Strzok on Feb. 25, 2016, in the midst of the presidential campaign, in reference to Clinton.
…
>“The last thing you need [is] going in there loaded for bear,” she continued. “You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more [DOJ] than [FBI]?”

>Strzok replied that he “agreed” and he had relayed their discussion with someone named “Bill.”

>Strzok not only worked on the Clinton case, but was assigned to the special counsel’s probe into Russia and the Trump campaign after a number of anti-Trump texts were discovered on his phone. Page also briefly worked on the special counsel investigation.
…
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/25/fbi-officials-worried-about-being-too-tough-on-hillary-clinton-during-email-investigation-texts-show.html

…
>The Daily Beast has learned that Hill Republicans are gearing up to use an obscure parliamentary rule to release it.

http://dennismichaellynch.com/memo-fisa-document-names-comey-rosenstein-and-mccabe/