Humongous if unquestionable.
>>100986Actual if factual
But seriously, what the fuck? Now Hooters?
This women
/demonspawn confuses me.
My reading of this implies she is puzzled by the previous association and then this current one. The rest is ironic humour.
Whoa, Chelsea’s followers have some really epic anti-Trump maymays
>>101380What is the chruch of Satan anyways, satanism is as fictional as the cult of chorazos.
Any religion that claims to be Satanist is just edgy, if you serve demons you are not a Satanist but a cultist of X demon.
Like luciferianism, a lot claim Lucifer to be Satan despite having nothing to do with that since Satan is not a thing but an idea.
>>101392I guess you have never heard the book sex magick ? , Or the author aleister crowley have you or anton lavey
>>101435>>101396What is satan, anon?
Lucifer is an archangel that falled from heaven when he tried to rebel against god, it used to be the angel of light, it is mentioned some times in the bible as satan but that doesn't mean he reigns the fucking hell, he was sent there to pay for his sins.
What is satan supposed to be, if its lucifer then the chruch of satan would be practicing luciferianism and not 'satanism'
That is why i call satan an idea, as there is no such being historically called satan, satan literally means adversary in hebrew ffs.
>>101478Satanism Truth be told they don’t believe in god or lucifer, but they like idea of lucifer as like saying I don’t believe in god but I like morals of Christianity, But there motto is Do what thou wilt which’s dangerous if you think about it.
>>101478Ah, I see what you’re saying. In that case, the Church of Satan is what
>>101511 said at best, and a celebration of literal demonic beings at worst. My assumption has been that Lucifer took over Hell after being cast into it, and the name “Satan” represents this transition.
>>101511Oh, yes i do remember reading about the rules of a satanist or something like that.
Truth be told i never got too deep into it;
Sounds a lot like masonry.
>>101530Well he has orobas as an oracle apparently, so it should be possible.
I just don't get why people assume hell didn't exist before lucifer tho, i do believe there where already some pretty big things down there.
>>101511This is an extreme simplification of occult ideology as represented by Aleister Crowley.
The
full quote is: "To what that thou wilt shall be the whole of the law, but LOVE shall be the law; love under will."
>>101511Such are false allegations against Aleister Crowley.
https://ac2012.com/2011/12/20/aleister-crowley-myths-busted/>I have been accused of being a ‘black magician.>’ No more foolish statement was ever made about me.>I despise the thing to such an extent that I can hardly believe in the existence of people so debased and idiotic as to practice it.Though he might have been an eccentric, he wasn't a satanist.
try to imagine a man like him in the Victorian era, 'tis no wonder he got a bad reputation. truly A man ahead of is time.
>>101594Have you ever a read his books sex magick particularly?
>>101594Also a good quick video on the occult, did you Also now mussolini kick out Aleister Crowley out of Italy
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hChZu13r15g >>101615when someone is ridiculed to such an extant as being called the worlds most evil man than it is clear that someone is trying to occult his teachings
>>101605No I have not.
But I should.:^) >>101610being an occultist is a negative thing in and of its self. But I'm not knowledgeable enough to talk anent it so go figure. In some way we are all occultists for we may have secrets of are very own, but that would be on of its many meanings.
>>101727>when someone is ridiculed to such an extant as being called the worlds most evil man than it is clear that someone is trying to occult his teachingsThe same could be said about lucifer
>No I have not. But I should.:^)I real hope you do look into because that’s how you find out your wrong also look into Abbey of Thelema
>>101610Anyhow, my point is he is not a satanist.
>>101734I agree he was more of a luciferian
>>101735Maybe I'm just being assumptive, though one mustn't forget to question
AUTHORITY.
I don't know much about Lucifer, do you?
I believe it translation fro Latin is light bringer.
>>101736Last time I checked this was a good idea everything on lucifer it’s only ten minutes
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=M4IVoTX_EOE >>101742But if the angels weren't corporal how can they bare children unto the daughters of man?
Damn its late here. got to go. Check out my post
about possible non-terrestrial in /VX/ I've worked hard on it.
>>101748Actually the Book of Enoch talks all about the angels and how they slept with women and how heaven works .
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5wbdjo7xnUg >>101733>The same could be said about luciferNo it can not. have you ever seen a book written by Lucifer. Have you ever read any poetry by him. he isn't even human. Listen there are many ensample in which this is the case. Wilhelm Reich being one of them. I think it is safe to say that I have seen through your subterfuge. My point still stands.