https://news.sky.com/story/pakistan-warns-kashmir-row-could-lead-to-all-out-war-with-india-13355033
Following a mass shooting in Kashmir that left 26 tourists dead that India have blamed on Pakistan, relations between the two countries have broken down.
Indian Prime Minister Modi has vowed to purse those responsible to the ends of the Earth while Pakistan's defence minister warns the row could result in all out war between the two countries.
Both countries have nuclear weapons.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
63 replies and 33 files omitted.
>>387424
Them nuking each other then coming over here and starting another fight would be par for the course.
Them nuking each other then coming over here and starting another fight would be par for the course.
I hope it doesn't go hot. If Pakistan nukes India all of that radioactive shit will get flung into the atmosphere and cause poocular winter.
It's going hot fast. Jeets shut down water, 80% of pakistan's water. That's a legitimate act of war and they are officially the aggressors in this conflict. The news doesn't even seem to know wtf to say. Did the kikes not plan this one? Did the jeets go to far?
Anyhow, BUY ALL THE BASMATI RICE! Starve those fucking jeets who are in our nations.
Anyhow, BUY ALL THE BASMATI RICE! Starve those fucking jeets who are in our nations.
I hope the jeets spill some blood
>>387442
Sadly, nukes are not a "solve everything" solution in this case. The Chernobyl exclusion zone has show us that subhuman animals can thrive in irradiated environments.
Sadly, nukes are not a "solve everything" solution in this case. The Chernobyl exclusion zone has show us that subhuman animals can thrive in irradiated environments.
1745546139.webm (653.6 KB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:06, 1551222944925.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>387423
Honestly, I doubt it'd get any further than some regional battles and some Indian extremist group making a retaliatory attack or two over this. Besides, wasn't the Delhi bombings in 2008 similar in casualties to this particular incident?
Honestly, I doubt it'd get any further than some regional battles and some Indian extremist group making a retaliatory attack or two over this. Besides, wasn't the Delhi bombings in 2008 similar in casualties to this particular incident?
1745561003.jpg (145.4 KB, 832x1216, E09B1C42E239A1069190761793B3D872-148831.jpg)
>>387512
It used to be funny but now it's just beating a dead horse. It proves ur utter and pathetic lack of creativity. You don't belong here
It used to be funny but now it's just beating a dead horse. It proves ur utter and pathetic lack of creativity. You don't belong here
>>387518
I do wonder what the future of culture war stuff will be like when everyone becomes numb to it, and the thinktanks behind that shit can't figure out how to make people excited for it again. Especially since short form content/social media has made it have the propensity to condense over time and people will exhaust the boilerplate faster. A lot of culture war humor got boring to me as early as highschool, and that was before tiktok and such even existed.
What will thinktanks do when jingling keys doesn't phase the audience anymore?
I do wonder what the future of culture war stuff will be like when everyone becomes numb to it, and the thinktanks behind that shit can't figure out how to make people excited for it again. Especially since short form content/social media has made it have the propensity to condense over time and people will exhaust the boilerplate faster. A lot of culture war humor got boring to me as early as highschool, and that was before tiktok and such even existed.
What will thinktanks do when jingling keys doesn't phase the audience anymore?
>>387518
How's this:
Oooh, they better be careful. Remember: If you die to a nuclear bomb, you get reincarnated as a cockroach.
How's this:
Oooh, they better be careful. Remember: If you die to a nuclear bomb, you get reincarnated as a cockroach.
>>387505
It's different now. Hindu nationalists have a majority of power and India thinks it can get a free ride now that they're infiltrating everywhere...
truth is, the world hates them now, maybe even more than people hate pakis.
It's different now. Hindu nationalists have a majority of power and India thinks it can get a free ride now that they're infiltrating everywhere...
truth is, the world hates them now, maybe even more than people hate pakis.
>>387552
I can't speak to pakis because as far as I know I've never met one in my life. Pajeets, on the other hand, somehow manage to ruin everything they touch and I'm very sick of seeing it happen.
I can't speak to pakis because as far as I know I've never met one in my life. Pajeets, on the other hand, somehow manage to ruin everything they touch and I'm very sick of seeing it happen.
>>387569
Pakis, pajeet, bangla-desh, and around territories are all the same race, with caveats of course like koreans and japanese.
Pakis, pajeet, bangla-desh, and around territories are all the same race, with caveats of course like koreans and japanese.
1745581320_1.webm (2.1 MB, Resolution:404x720 Length:00:00:13, 1715606619350574.webm) [play once] [loop]
1745581320_2.webm (2.8 MB, Resolution:480x354 Length:00:01:07, 1714407641311995.webm) [play once] [loop]
1745581320_3.webm (3.8 MB, Resolution:480x852 Length:00:01:31, 1714421889031778.webm) [play once] [loop]
It was always inevitable. Common people divided by religious ideology. Anyone else reminded of the Levant?
One thing that always intrigued me was Attari–Wagah border ceremony (Retreat Ceremony). High-intensity military posturing.
>[YouTube] Most INTENSE Border Ceremony in the World? ATTARI 🇮🇳 WAGAH 🇵🇰![]()
Currently that ceremony is suspended, due to the tensions between India and Pakistan. Fun times since both nations have nuclear weapons.
One thing that always intrigued me was Attari–Wagah border ceremony (Retreat Ceremony). High-intensity military posturing.
>[YouTube] Most INTENSE Border Ceremony in the World? ATTARI 🇮🇳 WAGAH 🇵🇰
Currently that ceremony is suspended, due to the tensions between India and Pakistan. Fun times since both nations have nuclear weapons.
>>387588
>Fun times since both nations have nuclear weapons.
Do you know there are strong hints that nukes are a hoax?
>Fun times since both nations have nuclear weapons.
Do you know there are strong hints that nukes are a hoax?
>>387588
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14646727/Pakistan-WAR-threat-India-nuclear-armed-rivals-exchange-fire-border-Kashmir-tourist-massacre.html
Apparently exchanging fire at the border now.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14646727/Pakistan-WAR-threat-India-nuclear-armed-rivals-exchange-fire-border-Kashmir-tourist-massacre.html
Apparently exchanging fire at the border now.
https://x.com/zhao_dashuai/status/1915197948528676970
https://fixvx.com/IranObserver0/status/1915421263876575294
India has cut off 80% of Pakistan's water. This cannot end well.
https://fixvx.com/IranObserver0/status/1915421263876575294
India has cut off 80% of Pakistan's water. This cannot end well.
>>387605
From the sounds of things it's not an immediate cut-off, however tearing up the treaty does mean India can build more dams and things at their end of the river which will reduce water flowing into Pakistan in future.
From the sounds of things it's not an immediate cut-off, however tearing up the treaty does mean India can build more dams and things at their end of the river which will reduce water flowing into Pakistan in future.
>>387611
If they cut off Pakistan's water supply, it would be an act of war greater than any of these bombings. Losing access to the indus river would be an existential threat to Pakistan's society, causing desertification, famine and economic devastation. Pakistan would get desperate and lash out in an attempt to save themselves, because hunger/thirst eventually overcomes fear/rationality.
If they cut off Pakistan's water supply, it would be an act of war greater than any of these bombings. Losing access to the indus river would be an existential threat to Pakistan's society, causing desertification, famine and economic devastation. Pakistan would get desperate and lash out in an attempt to save themselves, because hunger/thirst eventually overcomes fear/rationality.
>>387615
Yes it is a BIG problem for Pakistan. However Pakistan has also harboured terrorists fo9r decades that continue to kill people to this day that they apparently refuse to do anything about so I think now Pakistan's coices are A: Clean up their house B: nuclear war or C: Literally die of thirst.
Yes it is a BIG problem for Pakistan. However Pakistan has also harboured terrorists fo9r decades that continue to kill people to this day that they apparently refuse to do anything about so I think now Pakistan's coices are A: Clean up their house B: nuclear war or C: Literally die of thirst.
>>387616
They could however use the dams they have to reduce the flow. Even a 5% reduction in water flow could be devastating.
They could however use the dams they have to reduce the flow. Even a 5% reduction in water flow could be devastating.
>>387573
Yeah. It's going to be brutal if the water stays off. There is no other option but to fight.
>>387616
It doesn't change anything. They could have taken any other option other than this and been better off on the world stage. Now they're saying they want "the israel plan for kashmir" and to officially jeet israeli plans for gaza onto pakistan... which is not actually going to be effective at all, while ruining their image on the world stage.
Yeah. It's going to be brutal if the water stays off. There is no other option but to fight.
>>387616
It doesn't change anything. They could have taken any other option other than this and been better off on the world stage. Now they're saying they want "the israel plan for kashmir" and to officially jeet israeli plans for gaza onto pakistan... which is not actually going to be effective at all, while ruining their image on the world stage.
>>387741
>to officially jeet israeli plans for gaza onto pakistan
Sending the Palestinians to Pakistan you mean? Where did you hear this?
>to officially jeet israeli plans for gaza onto pakistan
Sending the Palestinians to Pakistan you mean? Where did you hear this?
>>387616
They won't just sit and die of thirst, and they won't just suddenly stop being savage sandpajeets either. They will choose nuclear war if it comes to that.
They won't just sit and die of thirst, and they won't just suddenly stop being savage sandpajeets either. They will choose nuclear war if it comes to that.
>>387769
So they both get nuked, and fuck up the entire hemisphere with their poocular winter while they're at it.
So they both get nuked, and fuck up the entire hemisphere with their poocular winter while they're at it.
>>387718
>Nagasaki
Exactly, and Hiroshima too. There was not and there is not any radioactive measurements. Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.
>Nagasaki
Exactly, and Hiroshima too. There was not and there is not any radioactive measurements. Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.
>>387796
Try visiting there. I'm sure they would love to hear your insights.
>Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.
That is not how nuclear weapons work.
Try visiting there. I'm sure they would love to hear your insights.
>Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.
That is not how nuclear weapons work.
>>387821
>That is not how nuclear weapons work.
Ahem. So you are saying a nuclear "detonation" will not leave any radioactive residue?
>That is not how nuclear weapons work.
Ahem. So you are saying a nuclear "detonation" will not leave any radioactive residue?
>>387857
>What is its half life?
Ah, you mean isotope decay. Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years. You see, the decay will end when isotopes turn into inert lead.
>What is its half life?
Ah, you mean isotope decay. Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years. You see, the decay will end when isotopes turn into inert lead.
>>387860
Wrong. Nuclear fallout has a half life of about 30 years. The bomb was dropped about 80 years ago.
Wrong. Nuclear fallout has a half life of about 30 years. The bomb was dropped about 80 years ago.
>>387855
The radiation decayed over the past 80 years. It was almost entirely gone in the late 50's.
>>387860
>Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years.
No it fucking doesn't, you delusional midwit. You are making shit up based on nonsense you absorbed third hand through memes. Nuclear fallout from an atom bomb decays over the course of a couple decades.
The radiation decayed over the past 80 years. It was almost entirely gone in the late 50's.
>>387860
>Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years.
No it fucking doesn't, you delusional midwit. You are making shit up based on nonsense you absorbed third hand through memes. Nuclear fallout from an atom bomb decays over the course of a couple decades.
>>387861
>Wrong.
Seriously?
Let us see, if my instrument measured 1 rad on 1945, then, and according to you, in 1975 the reading would be 0.5 rad and in 2005, 0.25 rad.
>Wrong.
Seriously?
Let us see, if my instrument measured 1 rad on 1945, then, and according to you, in 1975 the reading would be 0.5 rad and in 2005, 0.25 rad.
>>387867
What are you asserting? No scientists say that atom bombs irradiate an area "for thousands of years". Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.
What are you asserting? No scientists say that atom bombs irradiate an area "for thousands of years". Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.
>>387867
After 30 years half of the radioactive material has decayed, again halving every 30 years. That is what half life means. Taking 90 years for ease of calculation it has halved, then halved then halved again so is now at 1/8th of what it was originally.
After 30 years half of the radioactive material has decayed, again halving every 30 years. That is what half life means. Taking 90 years for ease of calculation it has halved, then halved then halved again so is now at 1/8th of what it was originally.
>>387869
>Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.
Exactly, and that contradicts science. Therefore those cities were never nuked.
Just undeniable facts.
>Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.
Exactly, and that contradicts science. Therefore those cities were never nuked.
Just undeniable facts.
>>387875
You were talking about it lasting thousands of years. Things with a half life of thousands of years are barely radioactive at all. Dangerously radioactive things have a half life in days or hours.
You were talking about it lasting thousands of years. Things with a half life of thousands of years are barely radioactive at all. Dangerously radioactive things have a half life in days or hours.
>>387872
>Exactly, and that contradicts science.
What science are you referencing? We both just demonstrated to you how the radiation from the bomb would decay to irrelevant levels over the course of a few decades.
>Exactly, and that contradicts science.
What science are you referencing? We both just demonstrated to you how the radiation from the bomb would decay to irrelevant levels over the course of a few decades.
>>387877
>You were talking about it lasting thousands of years.
Correct, that is why Carbon 14 is a test, a very unreliable test by the way, but it works because isotope decay last millions of years.
>You were talking about it lasting thousands of years.
Correct, that is why Carbon 14 is a test, a very unreliable test by the way, but it works because isotope decay last millions of years.
>>387880
Nigger, you should be able to do this math with a highschool level education.
Since you are so smart, write it out and tell me what number you get for the amount of time for nuclear fallout to decay to irrelevant levels.
(Spoiler alert: it's not thousands of years)
Nigger, you should be able to do this math with a highschool level education.
Since you are so smart, write it out and tell me what number you get for the amount of time for nuclear fallout to decay to irrelevant levels.
(Spoiler alert: it's not thousands of years)
>>387886
>Not all radioactive materials are the same.
Sure, but in the case of Carbon 14, the test is based in a comparison between C14 and highly radioactive material.
>Not all radioactive materials are the same.
Sure, but in the case of Carbon 14, the test is based in a comparison between C14 and highly radioactive material.
>>387890
Sure, but because you look like can't grasp the concept of isotope decay, kindergarten level I should apply.
Sure, but because you look like can't grasp the concept of isotope decay, kindergarten level I should apply.
>>387896
That is how it works. You absorb carbon 14 from food meaning you right now have a certain ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 in your body. Then you die and stop taking in carbon 14, which then slowly decays over time.
That is how it works. You absorb carbon 14 from food meaning you right now have a certain ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 in your body. Then you die and stop taking in carbon 14, which then slowly decays over time.
>>387902
Sorry, U235 when turning into isotopes gives way to a whole range of highly radioactive elements. And if remember well, when diluted in acids are called salts.
Sorry, U235 when turning into isotopes gives way to a whole range of highly radioactive elements. And if remember well, when diluted in acids are called salts.
>>387903
Cesium-137 half life ~30 years
Strontium-90 half life ~28 years.
Iodine-131 half life 8 days.
That's nuclear fallout.
Cesium-137 half life ~30 years
Strontium-90 half life ~28 years.
Iodine-131 half life 8 days.
That's nuclear fallout.
>>387911
You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days. The shortest half life on that list is 8 days.
You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days. The shortest half life on that list is 8 days.
Radiation is directly related to the half life though. Radiation comes from the decay of the atoms, meaning that the higher the half-life of the element, the less dangerous it is. So elements with very, very long half lifes are not actually very dangerous, at least relative to those with very short half lifes.
Sure, there are elements out there with half life's in the millions, billions, or even trillions of years, but they are barely radioactive at all.
Sure, there are elements out there with half life's in the millions, billions, or even trillions of years, but they are barely radioactive at all.
>>387903
>That's still not relevant to the atom bomb's fallout.
Of course not, but I trying to explain the periodic table to you.
>That's still not relevant to the atom bomb's fallout.
Of course not, but I trying to explain the periodic table to you.
>>387912
>You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days.
Nope, I said that never were any atomic explosion and it is actually a hoax.
>You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days.
Nope, I said that never were any atomic explosion and it is actually a hoax.
I'm tired of arguing with this boomer. He's been shitting up this board for four years now with his retardation, and I feel guilty for letting him once again bait me into derailing another good thread.
It's midnight. Hopefully the jeets nuke eachother to deatb, so we can demonstrate to the village idiot how nukes work in real time.
>>387912
You are correct. I was thinking of the dangers of acute exposure. I stand corrected.
>387914
>>>/cyb/
>>387917
Just give up. There's no reasoning with this asshole. Just look at how he behaved in the flat earth thread.
It's midnight. Hopefully the jeets nuke eachother to deatb, so we can demonstrate to the village idiot how nukes work in real time.
>>387912
You are correct. I was thinking of the dangers of acute exposure. I stand corrected.
>387914
>>>/cyb/
>>387917
Just give up. There's no reasoning with this asshole. Just look at how he behaved in the flat earth thread.
>>387919
You don't know the science though. You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.
You don't know the science though. You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.
>>387921
>You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.
That's is what the American government taught the America people in the 50s, 60s, and 70s in bibliographies and news and movies.
>You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.
That's is what the American government taught the America people in the 50s, 60s, and 70s in bibliographies and news and movies.
>>387924
More like the US government was doing radiation experiments on you and told you it was only a little bit of radiation but was in fact a lot of radiation. People got sick and ever since have believe that even a little radiation is deadly.
More like the US government was doing radiation experiments on you and told you it was only a little bit of radiation but was in fact a lot of radiation. People got sick and ever since have believe that even a little radiation is deadly.
I don't think we're lucky enough to get a war between India and Pakistan. Isn't the Pakistani government completely broke and non-functional, and basically on the verge of collapse? I can't imagine Pakistan successfully waging a war against India.
>>387921
In all my arguing with the boomer for the past four years, he has never, ever even once changed his opinion or acknowledged a fact that contradicted his worldview. You may as well be arguing with a brick wall.
>>387924
>That's is what the American government taught the America people
No. That is not what the government said. Hiroshima was already rebuilt by then. Point to an official government statement that says that.
It's only Hollywood that says that crap, because they don't actually know how it works.
>>387925
Also this.
The government didn't even know how radiation affected people in the 60s, which is why glowniggers kept dosing Americans with acute doses of it to see what it would do to people.
>>387927
America is more likely to side with India than Pakistan. We only pay the Pakis to keep them from blowing things up.
[Read more] In all my arguing with the boomer for the past four years, he has never, ever even once changed his opinion or acknowledged a fact that contradicted his worldview. You may as well be arguing with a brick wall.
>>387924
>That's is what the American government taught the America people
No. That is not what the government said. Hiroshima was already rebuilt by then. Point to an official government statement that says that.
It's only Hollywood that says that crap, because they don't actually know how it works.
>>387925
Also this.
The government didn't even know how radiation affected people in the 60s, which is why glowniggers kept dosing Americans with acute doses of it to see what it would do to people.
>>387927
America is more likely to side with India than Pakistan. We only pay the Pakis to keep them from blowing things up.
>>387930
Give me an example of an officially published piece of "science" that echoes your claim that an atom bomb would irradiate an area for thousands of years.
Just one citation. Any example.
Give me an example of an officially published piece of "science" that echoes your claim that an atom bomb would irradiate an area for thousands of years.
Just one citation. Any example.
>>387931
>an atom bomb would irradiate an area for thousands of years.
>Just one citation. Any example.
I accept the challenge and in case the failure I'll take the L
Give me time.
>an atom bomb would irradiate an area for thousands of years.
>Just one citation. Any example.
I accept the challenge and in case the failure I'll take the L
Give me time.
>>387926
>Isn't the Pakistani government completely broke and non-functional, and basically on the verge of collapse?
That just means they have less to lose.
>I can't imagine Pakistan successfully waging a war against India.
Pakistan would probably lose, but that might not stop them from trying to cause as much destruction as possible.
>Isn't the Pakistani government completely broke and non-functional, and basically on the verge of collapse?
That just means they have less to lose.
>I can't imagine Pakistan successfully waging a war against India.
Pakistan would probably lose, but that might not stop them from trying to cause as much destruction as possible.
>>387934
That means they literally can't afford the war and won't be able to prosecute it though. They already have a vastly smaller population and economy.
That means they literally can't afford the war and won't be able to prosecute it though. They already have a vastly smaller population and economy.
>>387935
>That means they literally can't afford the war and won't be able to prosecute it though
They can still launch missiles. They are doing it as we speak.
>They already have a vastly smaller population and economy.
This is correct. They would likely lose to India.
But Muslims aren't known for self-preservation or rational risk assessment.
>That means they literally can't afford the war and won't be able to prosecute it though
They can still launch missiles. They are doing it as we speak.
>They already have a vastly smaller population and economy.
This is correct. They would likely lose to India.
But Muslims aren't known for self-preservation or rational risk assessment.
The Water dispute.
>>387423
Fighting heats up along the Line of Contact in the Leepa Valley in Kashmir.
https://[replace me with telegram]/Middle_East_Spectator/17654
Fighting heats up along the Line of Contact in the Leepa Valley in Kashmir.
https://[replace me with telegram]/Middle_East_Spectator/17654
>>388120
https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1916101372941828259
India release water into the river without notification causing flooding downstream in Pakistan.
https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1916101372941828259
India release water into the river without notification causing flooding downstream in Pakistan.
Well, shit. It looks like things are heating up.
If this was going to remain a purely local event, that would be one thing, but there are going to be some sort of knock-on effects worldwide, including in the West. Frankly, I think we've got enough problems to deal with here.
They'll probably bring their foreign conflicts into the borders of our countries, too.
If this was going to remain a purely local event, that would be one thing, but there are going to be some sort of knock-on effects worldwide, including in the West. Frankly, I think we've got enough problems to deal with here.
They'll probably bring their foreign conflicts into the borders of our countries, too.
lol, feeling thirsty yet pakitrannies
lmao even
lmao even
>>388149
>They'll probably bring their foreign conflicts into the borders of our countries, too.
No doubt.
>They'll probably bring their foreign conflicts into the borders of our countries, too.
No doubt.
British man more than a little happy to be leaving India.
https://x.com/CitizenBangla24/status/1915506817066586600
https://x.com/CitizenBangla24/status/1915506817066586600
1745806899.mp4 (512.7 KB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:15, maxs_meme_industry_part22025_04_27_20_38_43705be62e-8640-4654-b8b0-0dc420c64de0.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>388383
>refugees
The closest destination is Afghanistan, China, Bangladesh. There is no reason for shitskins to end up in White Lands. I bet those neighbor countries won't let them in under any circumstance.
>refugees
The closest destination is Afghanistan, China, Bangladesh. There is no reason for shitskins to end up in White Lands. I bet those neighbor countries won't let them in under any circumstance.
>>388385
>The closest destination
We both know that shitskins don't end up in "the closest destination".
>There is no reason for shitskins to end up in White Lands.
They will go to Europe for gibs.
>I bet those neighbor countries won't let them in under any circumstance.
Exactly. Neighboring countries will send them on their way to Europe.
>The closest destination
We both know that shitskins don't end up in "the closest destination".
>There is no reason for shitskins to end up in White Lands.
They will go to Europe for gibs.
>I bet those neighbor countries won't let them in under any circumstance.
Exactly. Neighboring countries will send them on their way to Europe.
>>388387
>Exactly. Neighboring countries will send them on their way to Europe.
that might have worked for 30 millionish "syrian" "refugees" who pretty much had a straight shot at Europe(and a bunch still wound up in Turkey), but an order of magnitude more will definitely crush even the passthrough countries.
>Exactly. Neighboring countries will send them on their way to Europe.
that might have worked for 30 millionish "syrian" "refugees" who pretty much had a straight shot at Europe(and a bunch still wound up in Turkey), but an order of magnitude more will definitely crush even the passthrough countries.
>>388387
>They will go to Europe for gibs.
>>388390
>but an order of magnitude more
Then make room for the pajeet race. Think about it, White countries don't exist any longer because the frog in the pan was cooked slowly, may be, just may be, by suddenly increasing the heat the frog will jump and fight back. Otherwise extinction is the well deserved fate of a comfy and coward White race.
>They will go to Europe for gibs.
>>388390
>but an order of magnitude more
Then make room for the pajeet race. Think about it, White countries don't exist any longer because the frog in the pan was cooked slowly, may be, just may be, by suddenly increasing the heat the frog will jump and fight back. Otherwise extinction is the well deserved fate of a comfy and coward White race.
>>388391
>They will go to Europe for gibs.
Will they be magically teleporting? hundreds of millions of people are going to have to trundle over thousands of miles to get from India to Europe.
>Then make room for the pajeet race.
read the post again, the Chinese, Arabs, et al will NOT be making room for the pajeet race, even assuming that Europe is totally cool with being destroyed.
>They will go to Europe for gibs.
Will they be magically teleporting? hundreds of millions of people are going to have to trundle over thousands of miles to get from India to Europe.
>Then make room for the pajeet race.
read the post again, the Chinese, Arabs, et al will NOT be making room for the pajeet race, even assuming that Europe is totally cool with being destroyed.
>>388402
>hundreds of millions of people are going to have to trundle over thousands of miles to get from India to Europe.
USAID and Christian and jew charities teleported tens of millions of non-Whites from around the world into the States before. So, they have experience how to do it.
>read the post again
Correct, read it again. I was referring to US (we) should make room as an accelerationist measure.
>hundreds of millions of people are going to have to trundle over thousands of miles to get from India to Europe.
USAID and Christian and jew charities teleported tens of millions of non-Whites from around the world into the States before. So, they have experience how to do it.
>read the post again
Correct, read it again. I was referring to US (we) should make room as an accelerationist measure.
>>388403
>USAID and Christian and jew charities teleported tens of millions of non-Whites from around the world into the States before. So, they have experience how to do it.
Tens of millions over decades is not hundreds of millions immediately. They emphatically have no way to move that many people.
>Correct, read it again.
Your point is rendered irrelevant by the above.
>USAID and Christian and jew charities teleported tens of millions of non-Whites from around the world into the States before. So, they have experience how to do it.
Tens of millions over decades is not hundreds of millions immediately. They emphatically have no way to move that many people.
>Correct, read it again.
Your point is rendered irrelevant by the above.
>>388411
>They emphatically have no way to move that many people
The purpose of bringing non-Whites is to replace Whites while bankrolling their reproduction, giving them full political rights, and introducing them into the labor market as soon as possible, all which is tied together to dispossess Whites. Even not fetching any more foreigners, and taking into account the fertility rates, Whites already lost their land. There is no way to deny that.
>They emphatically have no way to move that many people
The purpose of bringing non-Whites is to replace Whites while bankrolling their reproduction, giving them full political rights, and introducing them into the labor market as soon as possible, all which is tied together to dispossess Whites. Even not fetching any more foreigners, and taking into account the fertility rates, Whites already lost their land. There is no way to deny that.
>>388416
From the kike's mouth. Jump to timestamp 1:00:
"The task is to bring these minorities together in such a way, that it makes it impossible for the legacy of whiteness to reproduce itself"
From the kike's mouth. Jump to timestamp 1:00:
"The task is to bring these minorities together in such a way, that it makes it impossible for the legacy of whiteness to reproduce itself"
>>388416
Ok, if you want to start another thread about doomerisms and how nukes are fake go do that, but we are talking about India/Pakistan here, and its likely outcomes.
Ok, if you want to start another thread about doomerisms and how nukes are fake go do that, but we are talking about India/Pakistan here, and its likely outcomes.
>>388419
Do you suppose they've hypnotized themselves into actually believing the nonsense?
That the one and only race that has done the most for humanity, that has ended slavery within it's own borders and worked to end slavery in a more general sense, is really the only group who can be tarred with the brush of slavery?
This is probably best discussed in a Jewish Nonsense specific thread. It bugs me that they seem to live with passion in a kind of anti-truth bubble of insanity. Words being used to obtain power rather than more perfectly describe truth is disgusting to me on a bone-deep level.
Do you suppose they've hypnotized themselves into actually believing the nonsense?
That the one and only race that has done the most for humanity, that has ended slavery within it's own borders and worked to end slavery in a more general sense, is really the only group who can be tarred with the brush of slavery?
This is probably best discussed in a Jewish Nonsense specific thread. It bugs me that they seem to live with passion in a kind of anti-truth bubble of insanity. Words being used to obtain power rather than more perfectly describe truth is disgusting to me on a bone-deep level.
>>388526
Yeah, sure, but what does that have to do with what I said?
The pajeet's opinion is irrelevant. He has no authority to dictate USA policy towards this war.
Yeah, sure, but what does that have to do with what I said?
The pajeet's opinion is irrelevant. He has no authority to dictate USA policy towards this war.
>>388529
That alien creature has been placed on a position of power over White America. It is the symbolism and another attempt to normalize non-Whites on the land.
That alien creature has been placed on a position of power over White America. It is the symbolism and another attempt to normalize non-Whites on the land.
>>388531
Mass repatriation of the foreigners first. I don't want the overflow from this conflict to negatively affect the West.
Mass repatriation of the foreigners first. I don't want the overflow from this conflict to negatively affect the West.
>>388534
>Mass repatriation of the foreigners first.
And denaturalization second together with their children.
>Mass repatriation of the foreigners first.
And denaturalization second together with their children.
1745894381_1.jpg (202.5 KB, 688x523, Screenshot_20250428_221242.jpg)
1745894381_2.jpg (351.4 KB, 818x796, Screenshot_20250428_221500.jpg)
1745894381_3.jpg (759.2 KB, 850x1670, Screenshot_20250428_221700.jpg)
>>387931
>Give me an example of an officially published piece of "science" that echoes your claim that an atom bomb would irradiate an area for thousands of years.
I was unable to find the academic science citation but I found the establishment propaganda citation instead.
https://theconversation.com/100-000-years-and-counting-how-do-we-tell-future-generations-about-highly-radioactive-nuclear-waste-repositories-199441
https://www.coalitionbrewing.com/how-long-would-the-earth-be-radioactive-after-a-nuclear-war/
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2023/03/01/do-not-fear-nuclear-war-you-can-survive/
>Give me an example of an officially published piece of "science" that echoes your claim that an atom bomb would irradiate an area for thousands of years.
I was unable to find the academic science citation but I found the establishment propaganda citation instead.
https://theconversation.com/100-000-years-and-counting-how-do-we-tell-future-generations-about-highly-radioactive-nuclear-waste-repositories-199441
https://www.coalitionbrewing.com/how-long-would-the-earth-be-radioactive-after-a-nuclear-war/
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2023/03/01/do-not-fear-nuclear-war-you-can-survive/
>>388578
This source does not say that Hiroshima should be uninhabitable for "thousands of years".
This source is talking about concentrated nuclear waste disposal, not nuclear weapons. It's apples to oranges.
Make a different thread to talk about nukes, to not derail this one.
This source does not say that Hiroshima should be uninhabitable for "thousands of years".
This source is talking about concentrated nuclear waste disposal, not nuclear weapons. It's apples to oranges.
Make a different thread to talk about nukes, to not derail this one.
>>388581
>This source does not say that Hiroshima should be uninhabitable for "thousands of years".
Any nuke contains as main ingredient plutonium which has a half-life of thousands of years.
>This source does not say that Hiroshima should be uninhabitable for "thousands of years".
Any nuke contains as main ingredient plutonium which has a half-life of thousands of years.
1745913381_1.jpg (347.7 KB, 716x1150, Pat Buchanan - The wars of race and culture.jpg)
>>387526
>I do wonder what the future of culture war stuff will be like
According to Patrick Buchanan, the future is Race War.
>I do wonder what the future of culture war stuff will be like
According to Patrick Buchanan, the future is Race War.
>inbred for WAR
>Die defending literal SHIT
They give war such a bad name.
>Die defending literal SHIT
They give war such a bad name.
How would surrounding countries get involved? Obviously China would support Pakistan, but what of Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Iran, Afghanistan, or Tajikistan? Who would get involved and who would they support? Any chance of it spreading beyond the region?
>>389127
Nah. There's nothing to win.
According to the paki minister of defense, a few days ago live on the anglo TV, when he was pushed on the issue of Pakistan supporting terrorism in the region, he answered that they were doing the "dirty work" of Americans and the British, and that they were paid for it.
The femoid tv anchor was left speechless and changed the subject on the fly.
Nah. There's nothing to win.
According to the paki minister of defense, a few days ago live on the anglo TV, when he was pushed on the issue of Pakistan supporting terrorism in the region, he answered that they were doing the "dirty work" of Americans and the British, and that they were paid for it.
The femoid tv anchor was left speechless and changed the subject on the fly.
>>389132
>Nah. There's nothing to win.
I could see other's being drawn in not for land grabs, but simply to weaken regional and geopolitical adversaries. For example if China gets drawn in then the U.S. will offer aid to India simply to help weaken China.
>Nah. There's nothing to win.
I could see other's being drawn in not for land grabs, but simply to weaken regional and geopolitical adversaries. For example if China gets drawn in then the U.S. will offer aid to India simply to help weaken China.
>>389135
>but simply to weaken regional and geopolitical adversaries
There is a bigger game at play. America is expanding in Philippines and now wants naval bases in India for a hypothetical naval blockade of China. Then is bribing the pajeet oligarchy by moving factories from China to India while promise them that the production is destined to America. A very juicy opportunity serving as a carrot. On the other hand, this paki incident looks like a stick to remind the pajeets to stay on the script.
>but simply to weaken regional and geopolitical adversaries
There is a bigger game at play. America is expanding in Philippines and now wants naval bases in India for a hypothetical naval blockade of China. Then is bribing the pajeet oligarchy by moving factories from China to India while promise them that the production is destined to America. A very juicy opportunity serving as a carrot. On the other hand, this paki incident looks like a stick to remind the pajeets to stay on the script.
>>389256
Oh! Hell yeah! Let's make a bet on who will use the atomic bomb first (if they would). Israel and Iran have been taking so long, finally another series has come out! Let's see what happens!
Oh! Hell yeah! Let's make a bet on who will use the atomic bomb first (if they would). Israel and Iran have been taking so long, finally another series has come out! Let's see what happens!
>>389258
As we all know, a nuclear war between India and Pakistan would spark World War III and lead to global annihilation. Honestly, I always expected something like this to happen someday, but it's a shame that it has to start because of a bunch of curry-smelling street apes!
As we all know, a nuclear war between India and Pakistan would spark World War III and lead to global annihilation. Honestly, I always expected something like this to happen someday, but it's a shame that it has to start because of a bunch of curry-smelling street apes!
>>389258
The question is, will China get involved given that Pakistan is an important ally of theirs and they also want to grab some land in Kashmir.
The question is, will China get involved given that Pakistan is an important ally of theirs and they also want to grab some land in Kashmir.
>>389260
Iran might get a chance to mediate __ that is, if these curry apes can stop flinging nukes like shit at each other!
Iran might get a chance to mediate __ that is, if these curry apes can stop flinging nukes like shit at each other!
whatcha mean to say is... something is happening?
that's like third time this year already
that's like third time this year already
>>389266
If we're being realistic, this will probably end like the others. A few minor skirmishes and nothing major, even though the risks looked worse before.
The real problem is, this time it's between two way less stable countries, both packed with a fucking massive population!
If we're being realistic, this will probably end like the others. A few minor skirmishes and nothing major, even though the risks looked worse before.
The real problem is, this time it's between two way less stable countries, both packed with a fucking massive population!
>>389256
2 Indian jets shot down apparently.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/pakistans-air-force-shot-down-212649056.html
2 Indian jets shot down apparently.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/pakistans-air-force-shot-down-212649056.html
>>389267
it's true that when regarding russia, they couldn't go a full-blown war. wonder if it'd be different in this case
india has mostly western weapon imports
and pakistan would probably be supported by china(?)
if india started the conflict, they'd probably get cut off but pakistan could be more aggressive and still have chinese support
that's just my wild guess
it's true that when regarding russia, they couldn't go a full-blown war. wonder if it'd be different in this case
india has mostly western weapon imports
and pakistan would probably be supported by china(?)
if india started the conflict, they'd probably get cut off but pakistan could be more aggressive and still have chinese support
that's just my wild guess
>>389270
Right, just like I said earlier and you also pointed out, this time third parties don't have much control over the situation.
Maybe if Pakistan had started the conflict, things could be handled better, but right now it’s a real mess.
If the war escalates, there will probably be a massive refugee wave too.
Even though Iran is a neighbor for them, I doubt they would let them in , Especially given the current anti-immigration policies toward Afghans and Pakistanis, pushed mainly by the parliament.
That would just make the predictions above even more likely, with Europe taking the biggest hit from the incoming migrant flood.
Right, just like I said earlier and you also pointed out, this time third parties don't have much control over the situation.
Maybe if Pakistan had started the conflict, things could be handled better, but right now it’s a real mess.
If the war escalates, there will probably be a massive refugee wave too.
Even though Iran is a neighbor for them, I doubt they would let them in , Especially given the current anti-immigration policies toward Afghans and Pakistanis, pushed mainly by the parliament.
That would just make the predictions above even more likely, with Europe taking the biggest hit from the incoming migrant flood.
>>389271
India mainly home built or Soviet/Russian
Pakistan mainly Western (America and Europe) plus China.
India mainly home built or Soviet/Russian
Pakistan mainly Western (America and Europe) plus China.
>>389274
Pakistan might be more flexible with supplies, but India’s stronger thanks to its self-reliance.
In the end, it all depends on whether the big players step in or not...
Pakistan might be more flexible with supplies, but India’s stronger thanks to its self-reliance.
In the end, it all depends on whether the big players step in or not...
>>387438
>officially the aggressors
What’s official is made up nonsense by tyrants and criminal gangs naming themselves a state.
Instead lets be practical: why side with the muslim country?
>officially the aggressors
What’s official is made up nonsense by tyrants and criminal gangs naming themselves a state.
Instead lets be practical: why side with the muslim country?
>>387878
>radiation from the bomb would decay to irrelevant levels over the course of a few decades.
Shhhh cant say that; the USSR worked hard to subvert the population into believing nuclear war creates Fallout monsters to scare off the western powers dealing with it in the 50s.
>radiation from the bomb would decay to irrelevant levels over the course of a few decades.
Shhhh cant say that; the USSR worked hard to subvert the population into believing nuclear war creates Fallout monsters to scare off the western powers dealing with it in the 50s.
>>389275
>Pakistan might be more flexible with supplies, but India’s stronger thanks to its self-reliance.
Stronger in the same way a goldfish is stronger than a minnow. Neither country is cut out for war and millions will perish alone due to stupid avoidable logistic incapacity. Everything from ambulance and fire response ot knowing where the fuck to go because India doesn't have street names, to friendly fire because they're all remorseless trigger-happy cowards.
>self-reliance.
The ability to maintain the lowest conceivable quality of living with famine, disease, and crime at the world's highest is hardly self-reliant.
>>389279
>why side with the muslim country?
Nobody is siding with either. Muslims and Hindus are all a negative on Earth for their own reasons. The effects of either disappearing would be great, but at this fragment of time the Hindus vanishing would bring the quality of life up for everyone. No more scams, no more overloaded internet, no more hyper pollution... I fully stand with Pakistan in their efforts to bomb the shit off of Indian streets. When they're done, I fully stand with anyone who wants to glass Pakistan.
[Read more] >Pakistan might be more flexible with supplies, but India’s stronger thanks to its self-reliance.
Stronger in the same way a goldfish is stronger than a minnow. Neither country is cut out for war and millions will perish alone due to stupid avoidable logistic incapacity. Everything from ambulance and fire response ot knowing where the fuck to go because India doesn't have street names, to friendly fire because they're all remorseless trigger-happy cowards.
>self-reliance.
The ability to maintain the lowest conceivable quality of living with famine, disease, and crime at the world's highest is hardly self-reliant.
>>389279
>why side with the muslim country?
Nobody is siding with either. Muslims and Hindus are all a negative on Earth for their own reasons. The effects of either disappearing would be great, but at this fragment of time the Hindus vanishing would bring the quality of life up for everyone. No more scams, no more overloaded internet, no more hyper pollution... I fully stand with Pakistan in their efforts to bomb the shit off of Indian streets. When they're done, I fully stand with anyone who wants to glass Pakistan.
>>387926
>Isn't the Pakistani government completely broke and non-functional, and basically on the verge of collapse?
This is all nations, dysgenics has consequences.
>Isn't the Pakistani government completely broke and non-functional, and basically on the verge of collapse?
This is all nations, dysgenics has consequences.
>>389279
>[india hackers at it again]
the other one is a religious spaghethi also pakistan mainly is an ally of U.S.A (and israel apparently)
the best for the west is that to not get involved with it
this is their third time
two of the most populated countries are fighting eachothers again
their war only affects the global economy for us
--
i could be wrong entirely...
>[india hackers at it again]
the other one is a religious spaghethi also pakistan mainly is an ally of U.S.A (and israel apparently)
the best for the west is that to not get involved with it
this is their third time
two of the most populated countries are fighting eachothers again
their war only affects the global economy for us
--
i could be wrong entirely...
>>389279
>why side with the muslim country?
Why should we even take a side?
On one side you’ve got Muslims and Muslim-wannabe terrorists, on the other side you’ve got cow-worshipers and more Muslims.
How exactly are we supposed to pick a side here?
When two animals start fighting, we don’t jump in and say "I support this one!" or "I support that one!". We just pull them apart.
Trying to back one side now is the dumbest thing we could do, it would only escalate the conflict and blow back in our faces.
>why side with the muslim country?
Why should we even take a side?
On one side you’ve got Muslims and Muslim-wannabe terrorists, on the other side you’ve got cow-worshipers and more Muslims.
How exactly are we supposed to pick a side here?
When two animals start fighting, we don’t jump in and say "I support this one!" or "I support that one!". We just pull them apart.
Trying to back one side now is the dumbest thing we could do, it would only escalate the conflict and blow back in our faces.
>>389284
islam dogs vs slum dogs
thsoe animals were fighting for a long time
the terrorist vs the hackers
india is full nationalist retards who think their language was the first thing in the worlds
the other one is a terrorist organization if it was a country
no side worth fighting for
islam dogs vs slum dogs
thsoe animals were fighting for a long time
the terrorist vs the hackers
india is full nationalist retards who think their language was the first thing in the worlds
the other one is a terrorist organization if it was a country
no side worth fighting for
>>389281
>Hindus vanishing would bring the quality of life up for everyone. No more scams […]
Pakis are all that but muslim too. Can’t see why they’re not the one to lose first.
>Hindus vanishing would bring the quality of life up for everyone. No more scams […]
Pakis are all that but muslim too. Can’t see why they’re not the one to lose first.
>>389281
>Neither country is cut out for war and millions will perish alone due to stupid avoidable logistic incapacity.
Other than welfare being cut, i don’t see that happening much for india. Pakistans the one strongly reliant on indias control over the indus.
>Neither country is cut out for war and millions will perish alone due to stupid avoidable logistic incapacity.
Other than welfare being cut, i don’t see that happening much for india. Pakistans the one strongly reliant on indias control over the indus.
>>389284
>We just pull them apart.
If two deer in the wood are fighting, people don’t intervene. Your analogy doesn’t match up nor convince me that we should interfere with this skirmish.
>We just pull them apart.
If two deer in the wood are fighting, people don’t intervene. Your analogy doesn’t match up nor convince me that we should interfere with this skirmish.
>>389288
"we" can't really do anything
it is our retarded govs are the one who decide wtf they want to do and that is the saddest part
--
i am pretty they will try to calm them down ...
hopefully
"we" can't really do anything
it is our retarded govs are the one who decide wtf they want to do and that is the saddest part
--
i am pretty they will try to calm them down ...
hopefully
>>389289
it is hard to write on the fucking phone , i am watching the news rn
*that who will decide
**pretty sure
it is hard to write on the fucking phone , i am watching the news rn
*that who will decide
**pretty sure
>>389288
>If two deer in the wood are fighting...
If only they were fighting deep in the woods!
The real problem is, this brawl is happening right in the middle of the farm.
If we don't step in fast enough, these two raging cows will wreck the fields and probably stampede the other animals too.
>If two deer in the wood are fighting...
If only they were fighting deep in the woods!
The real problem is, this brawl is happening right in the middle of the farm.
If we don't step in fast enough, these two raging cows will wreck the fields and probably stampede the other animals too.
>>389275
Given that a lot of supplies have been given to places like Ukraine and Western armies are currently trying to rearm and restock themselves and that Pakistan does not make their weapons domestically, they will likely struggle to find the supplies for most of their kit with the possible exception of the Chinese stuff.
In the beginning I expect Pakistan to have the advantage due to superior Western weapons however I think in a more protracted conflict India wins out due to being able to make their own supplies.
Given that a lot of supplies have been given to places like Ukraine and Western armies are currently trying to rearm and restock themselves and that Pakistan does not make their weapons domestically, they will likely struggle to find the supplies for most of their kit with the possible exception of the Chinese stuff.
In the beginning I expect Pakistan to have the advantage due to superior Western weapons however I think in a more protracted conflict India wins out due to being able to make their own supplies.
>>389292
I think the same.
If the war gets worse and keeps going, Pakistan will probably end up using its last option__ nuclear weapons.
Then India will do it, too...
I think the same.
If the war gets worse and keeps going, Pakistan will probably end up using its last option__ nuclear weapons.
Then India will do it, too...
>>389293
Maye but let's hope not. Especially with Pakistan threatening to kill everyone on the planet.
Maye but let's hope not. Especially with Pakistan threatening to kill everyone on the planet.
>>389291
Still doesn't make sense. We don’t own the pakis or indians. I’m not dying for pakis/indians, sorry.
Still doesn't make sense. We don’t own the pakis or indians. I’m not dying for pakis/indians, sorry.
>>389293
probably so
but they had war before and it did not got that far
how many war we had after covid?
Ukraine (EU) vs Russia
Israel vs Palestine
some wars between niggers in the africa [who cares?]
now India vs Pakistan
..
Now we have to wait for
iran vs israel
china vs taiwan
and america vs russia,china or both
we getting there guys
a world war 3 feels closer than ever
[Read more] probably so
but they had war before and it did not got that far
how many war we had after covid?
Ukraine (EU) vs Russia
Israel vs Palestine
some wars between niggers in the africa [who cares?]
now India vs Pakistan
..
Now we have to wait for
iran vs israel
china vs taiwan
and america vs russia,china or both
we getting there guys
a world war 3 feels closer than ever
>>389297
i have a theory
what if it is israel's plan to make the middle east chaotic , so they can start a full on war or missile war with iran...?
i have a theory
what if it is israel's plan to make the middle east chaotic , so they can start a full on war or missile war with iran...?
>>389295
The logic is simple:
These two cows aren't just fighting in some random forest. They’re wrecking the farm, scaring the other animals, and spreading chaos to neighboring farms too.
As the chaos grows, the farmers (aka the other countries) will start blaming each other and eventually fighting among themselves.
If we don't stop these two nuclear-armed idiots now, the conflict will escalate, nukes will fly, and other nuclear powers will get dragged into it for all sorts of stupid reasons.
In the end, it won't matter if you're Indian, Pakistani, European, American, Iranian__ or anything else. Everyone's gonna get fucked.
Don't think it can't happen. Nobody thought ww2, which started with Germany and Poland, would end with nukes dropped on Japan.
Politics and wars are dumber and more unpredictable than you think.
>I’m not dying for pakis/indians, sorry.
We’re not dying for these people. We're supposed to calm them down before they destroy the whole damn world.
[Read more] The logic is simple:
These two cows aren't just fighting in some random forest. They’re wrecking the farm, scaring the other animals, and spreading chaos to neighboring farms too.
As the chaos grows, the farmers (aka the other countries) will start blaming each other and eventually fighting among themselves.
If we don't stop these two nuclear-armed idiots now, the conflict will escalate, nukes will fly, and other nuclear powers will get dragged into it for all sorts of stupid reasons.
In the end, it won't matter if you're Indian, Pakistani, European, American, Iranian__ or anything else. Everyone's gonna get fucked.
Don't think it can't happen. Nobody thought ww2, which started with Germany and Poland, would end with nukes dropped on Japan.
Politics and wars are dumber and more unpredictable than you think.
>I’m not dying for pakis/indians, sorry.
We’re not dying for these people. We're supposed to calm them down before they destroy the whole damn world.
>>389294
Pakistan is a pretty desprate position economically. The regime doesn't have a lot of options left.
Pakistan is a pretty desprate position economically. The regime doesn't have a lot of options left.
>what if it is israel's plan to make the middle east chaotic , so they can start a full on war or missile war with iran...?
Good conspiracy theory.
Some radicals in Iran say the same kind of stuff.
Kashmir could be a good target for Israel since it's mostly Muslim, but I don't think they started this.
Still, who knows, maybe you're right...
Good conspiracy theory.
Some radicals in Iran say the same kind of stuff.
Kashmir could be a good target for Israel since it's mostly Muslim, but I don't think they started this.
Still, who knows, maybe you're right...
>no one is stupid enough to drop nukes.
If you ask me, no one is stupid enough to want this war to escalate.
But we are talking about when humanity become stupid...
If you ask me, no one is stupid enough to want this war to escalate.
But we are talking about when humanity become stupid...
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-200] [201-263] [Next] [Live (last 200 replies)]
263 replies | 67 files | 76 UUIDs | Page 5
[Add to Thread Watcher]