https://news.sky.com/story/pakistan-warns-kashmir-row-could-lead-to-all-out-war-with-india-13355033Following a mass shooting in Kashmir that left 26 tourists dead that India have blamed on Pakistan, relations between the two countries have broken down.
Indian Prime Minister Modi has vowed to purse those responsible to the ends of the Earth while Pakistan's defence minister warns the row could result in all out war between the two countries.
Both countries have nuclear weapons.
163 replies and 49 files omitted.
>>387423>>387423>Both countries have nuclear weapons.Close your borders now, before you are flooded with "refugees" after they nuke each other.
>>387424Them nuking each other then coming over here and starting another fight would be par for the course.
I hope it doesn't go hot. If Pakistan nukes India all of that radioactive shit will get flung into the atmosphere and cause poocular winter.
>>387429Their turds will blot out the sun.
It's going hot fast. Jeets shut down water, 80% of pakistan's water. That's a legitimate act of war and they are officially the aggressors in this conflict. The news doesn't even seem to know wtf to say. Did the kikes not plan this one? Did the jeets go to far?
Anyhow, BUY ALL THE BASMATI RICE! Starve those fucking jeets who are in our nations.
>>387438They ended the Indus Water Treaty but have they actually turned the taps off?
I hope the jeets spill some blood
>>387423Hopefully they're going to nuke each other. BAM, poojit and pakigger problems solved!
>>387442Sadly, nukes are not a "solve everything" solution in this case. The Chernobyl exclusion zone has show us that subhuman animals can thrive in irradiated environments.
>>387423This is great. The pajeet race is going to smell gunpowder.
>>387447I doubt that they can smell anything, at least not over their usual stink.
>>387429All out nuclear destruction is the only thing that could sanitize that shithole.
>>387423Honestly, I doubt it'd get any further than some regional battles and some Indian extremist group making a retaliatory attack or two over this. Besides, wasn't the Delhi bombings in 2008 similar in casualties to this particular incident?
>>387512It used to be funny but now it's just beating a dead horse. It proves ur utter and pathetic lack of creativity. You don't belong here
>>387518I do wonder what the future of culture war stuff will be like when everyone becomes numb to it, and the thinktanks behind that shit can't figure out how to make people excited for it again. Especially since short form content/social media has made it have the propensity to condense over time and people will exhaust the boilerplate faster. A lot of culture war humor got boring to me as early as highschool, and that was before tiktok and such even existed.
What will thinktanks do when jingling keys doesn't phase the audience anymore?
>>387518Making fun of brown people will always be funny.
>>387518Racism is the most sophisticated form of comedy. You are simply unenlightened.
>>387511If you have better, let us hear it.
>>387518How's this:
Oooh, they better be careful. Remember: If you die to a nuclear bomb, you get reincarnated as a cockroach.
>>387526Well put 10/10 have this (you)
>387528>387529>387539>387543Federal agents get no (you)'s
>>387439Yeah, they closed the dam.
>>387505It's different now. Hindu nationalists have a majority of power and India thinks it can get a free ride now that they're infiltrating everywhere...
truth is, the world hates them now, maybe even more than people hate pakis.
>>387423Oh boy, subcontinentals but now there's fucktons of them everywhere.
>>387552I can't speak to pakis because as far as I know I've never met one in my life. Pajeets, on the other hand, somehow manage to ruin everything they touch and I'm very sick of seeing it happen.
>>387569Pakis, pajeet, bangla-desh, and around territories are all the same race, with caveats of course like koreans and japanese.
>>387550Oh damn. Water war incoming.
It was always inevitable. Common people divided by religious ideology. Anyone else reminded of the Levant?
One thing that always intrigued me was Attari–Wagah border ceremony (Retreat Ceremony). High-intensity military posturing.
>[YouTube] Most INTENSE Border Ceremony in the World? ATTARI 🇮🇳 WAGAH 🇵🇰
[Embed]Currently that ceremony is suspended, due to the tensions between India and Pakistan. Fun times since both nations have nuclear weapons.
>>387588>Fun times since both nations have nuclear weapons.Do you know there are strong hints that nukes are a hoax?
>>387605From the sounds of things it's not an immediate cut-off, however tearing up the treaty does mean India can build more dams and things at their end of the river which will reduce water flowing into Pakistan in future.
>>387611Guess we'll be funding the Kashmir airport
>>387613Sounds about right for Labour. Probably give them Wales too.
>>387611If they cut off Pakistan's water supply, it would be an act of war greater than any of these bombings. Losing access to the indus river would be an existential threat to Pakistan's society, causing desertification, famine and economic devastation. Pakistan would get desperate and lash out in an attempt to save themselves, because hunger/thirst eventually overcomes fear/rationality.
>>387615Yes it is a BIG problem for Pakistan. However Pakistan has also harboured terrorists fo9r decades that continue to kill people to this day that they apparently refuse to do anything about so I think now Pakistan's coices are A: Clean up their house B: nuclear war or C: Literally die of thirst.
>>387616They could however use the dams they have to reduce the flow. Even a 5% reduction in water flow could be devastating.
>>387618Indeed. It's mostly desert that way.
>>387573Yeah. It's going to be brutal if the water stays off. There is no other option but to fight.
>>387616It doesn't change anything. They could have taken any other option other than this and been better off on the world stage. Now they're saying they want "the israel plan for kashmir" and to officially jeet israeli plans for gaza onto pakistan... which is not actually going to be effective at all, while ruining their image on the world stage.
>>387741>to officially jeet israeli plans for gaza onto pakistanSending the Palestinians to Pakistan you mean? Where did you hear this?
>>387616If it's against indians then I don't see the issue and also in favor of option B.
>>387616They won't just sit and die of thirst, and they won't just suddenly stop being savage sandpajeets either. They will choose nuclear war if it comes to that.
>>387763India is also a nuclear power.
>>387769So they both get nuked, and fuck up the entire hemisphere with their poocular winter while they're at it.
>>387771Certainly moots the water issue when it's suddenly all radioactive.
>>387718>Nagasaki Exactly, and Hiroshima too. There was not and there is not any radioactive measurements. Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.
>>387796Try visiting there. I'm sure they would love to hear your insights.
>Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.That is not how nuclear weapons work.
>>387821>That is not how nuclear weapons work.Ahem. So you are saying a nuclear "detonation" will not leave any radioactive residue?
>>387857>What is its half life?Ah, you mean isotope decay. Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years. You see, the decay will end when isotopes turn into inert lead.
>>387860Wrong. Nuclear fallout has a half life of about 30 years. The bomb was dropped about 80 years ago.
>>387855The radiation decayed over the past 80 years. It was almost entirely gone in the late 50's.
>>387860>Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years.No it fucking doesn't, you delusional midwit. You are making shit up based on nonsense you absorbed third hand through memes. Nuclear fallout from an atom bomb decays over the course of a couple decades.
>>387863It is *now*. Less so in the 50s.
>>387861>Wrong.Seriously?
Let us see, if my instrument measured 1 rad on 1945, then, and according to you, in 1975 the reading would be 0.5 rad and in 2005, 0.25 rad.
>>387867What are you asserting? No scientists say that atom bombs irradiate an area "for thousands of years". Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.
>>387867After 30 years half of the radioactive material has decayed, again halving every 30 years. That is what half life means. Taking 90 years for ease of calculation it has halved, then halved then halved again so is now at 1/8th of what it was originally.
>>387869>Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.Exactly, and that contradicts science. Therefore those cities were never nuked.
Just undeniable facts.
>>387875You were talking about it lasting thousands of years. Things with a half life of thousands of years are barely radioactive at all. Dangerously radioactive things have a half life in days or hours.
>>387872>Exactly, and that contradicts science.What science are you referencing? We both just demonstrated to you how the radiation from the bomb would decay to irrelevant levels over the course of a few decades.
>>387878>What science are you referencing?Physics 101, the isotope chapter.
>>387877>You were talking about it lasting thousands of years.Correct, that is why Carbon 14 is a test, a very unreliable test by the way, but it works because isotope decay last millions of years.
>>387885That one does. Not all radioactive materials are the same.
>>387880Nigger, you should be able to do this math with a highschool level education.
Since you are so smart, write it out and tell me what number you get for the amount of time for nuclear fallout to decay to irrelevant levels.
(Spoiler alert: it's not thousands of years)
>>387886>Not all radioactive materials are the same.Sure, but in the case of Carbon 14, the test is based in a comparison between C14 and highly radioactive material.
>>387889That's hardly relevant to the atom bombs dropped on Japan.
>>387890Sure, but because you look like can't grasp the concept of isotope decay, kindergarten level I should apply.
>>387889Carbon dating works by measuring the ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 in the sample.
>>387891Answer this
>>387887 , to prove that you can actually grasp it.
>>387887>CalculusSorry, it was so many years ago.
>>387896That is how it works. You absorb carbon 14 from food meaning you right now have a certain ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 in your body. Then you die and stop taking in carbon 14, which then slowly decays over time.
>>387898What about the range of uranides salts? That's way more emissions than carbon.
>>387900Not sure what you mean by that. Try to say it clearer.
>>387895>Sorry, it was so many years ago.So you're saying you don't actually know then?
I do. The answer is a bit over one year, with almost all of it being gone in first couple days.
>>387900That's still not relevant to the atom bomb's fallout.
>>387902Sorry, U235 when turning into isotopes gives way to a whole range of highly radioactive elements. And if remember well, when diluted in acids are called salts.
>>387903Cesium-137 half life ~30 years
Strontium-90 half life ~28 years.
Iodine-131 half life 8 days.
That's nuclear fallout.
>>387908>half lifeOkay, here is where you have the misunderstanding, that term "half life" is self explanatory. See
>>387867 for a practical tutorial.
>>387911You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days. The shortest half life on that list is 8 days.
Radiation is directly related to the half life though. Radiation comes from the decay of the atoms, meaning that the higher the half-life of the element, the less dangerous it is. So elements with very, very long half lifes are not actually very dangerous, at least relative to those with very short half lifes.
Sure, there are elements out there with half life's in the millions, billions, or even trillions of years, but they are barely radioactive at all.
>>387903>That's still not relevant to the atom bomb's fallout.Of course not, but I trying to explain the periodic table to you.
>>387912>You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days.Nope, I said that never were any atomic explosion and it is actually a hoax.
I'm tired of arguing with this boomer. He's been shitting up this board for four years now with his retardation, and I feel guilty for letting him once again bait me into derailing another good thread.
It's midnight. Hopefully the jeets nuke eachother to deatb, so we can demonstrate to the village idiot how nukes work in real time.
>>387912You are correct. I was thinking of the dangers of acute exposure. I stand corrected.
>387914>>>/cyb/>>387917Just give up. There's no reasoning with this asshole. Just look at how he behaved in the flat earth thread.
>>387917Whatever, but according to "science", the facts don't add up with the "official story".
>>387919You don't know the science though. You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.
>>387918>Hopefully the jeets nuke eachother to deatbI hope that too, sadly it won't happen.
>>387921>You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.That's is what the American government taught the America people in the 50s, 60s, and 70s in bibliographies and news and movies.
>>387924More like the US government was doing radiation experiments on you and told you it was only a little bit of radiation but was in fact a lot of radiation. People got sick and ever since have believe that even a little radiation is deadly.