/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
For Pony, Pony, Pony and Pony check out >>>/poner also Mares

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

India vs Pakistan.jpg
Possible war between India and Pakistan
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387423
387424 387442 387447 387476 387505 387563 387564 388135 388157
https://news.sky.com/story/pakistan-warns-kashmir-row-could-lead-to-all-out-war-with-india-13355033

Following a mass shooting in Kashmir that left 26 tourists dead that India have blamed on Pakistan, relations between the two countries have broken down.

Indian Prime Minister Modi has vowed to purse those responsible to the ends of the Earth while Pakistan's defence minister warns the row could result in all out war between the two countries.

Both countries have nuclear weapons.
163 replies and 49 files omitted.
Anonymous
11bd292
?
No.387424
387426
>>387423
>>387423
>Both countries have nuclear weapons.
Close your borders now, before you are flooded with "refugees" after they nuke each other.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387426
>>387424
Them nuking each other then coming over here and starting another fight would be par for the course.
Anonymous
4aaf364
?
No.387429
387432 387477 387511 387674
I hope it doesn't go hot. If Pakistan nukes India all of that radioactive shit will get flung into the atmosphere and cause poocular winter.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387432
387435 387511
>>387429
Their turds will blot out the sun.
Anonymous
996a979
?
No.387435
>>387432
Imagine the smell
Anonymous
9e9d0be
?
No.387438
387439 389279
95c9d0b20234bce6d1eb4467a019c56112a5e43a78bc2fcaf83324cd812beadc.png
It's going hot fast. Jeets shut down water, 80% of pakistan's water. That's a legitimate act of war and they are officially the aggressors in this conflict. The news doesn't even seem to know wtf to say. Did the kikes not plan this one? Did the jeets go to far?
Anyhow, BUY ALL THE BASMATI RICE! Starve those fucking jeets who are in our nations.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387439
387550
>>387438
They ended the Indus Water Treaty but have they actually turned the taps off?
Anonymous
4da98dc
?
No.387441
lose a rival.PNG
I hope the jeets spill some blood
Anonymous
ef528da
?
No.387442
387446
>>387423
Hopefully they're going to nuke each other. BAM, poojit and pakigger problems solved!
Anonymous
11bd292
?
No.387446
>>387442
Sadly, nukes are not a "solve everything" solution in this case. The Chernobyl exclusion zone has show us that subhuman animals can thrive in irradiated environments.
Anonymous
966c2d4
?
No.387447
387475 387511
273fca3.png
>>387423
This is great. The pajeet race is going to smell gunpowder.
Anonymous
11bd292
?
No.387475
387511
>>387447
I doubt that they can smell anything, at least not over their usual stink.
Anonymous
47abfe7
?
No.387476
387511
1745546139.webm (653.6 KB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:06, 1551222944925.webm) [play once] [loop]
1551222944925.webm
>>387423
world war poo again?
Anonymous
b698213
?
No.387477
387511
>>387429
All out nuclear destruction is the only thing that could sanitize that shithole.
Anonymous
9c35f5d
?
No.387505
387552
>>387423
Honestly, I doubt it'd get any further than some regional battles and some Indian extremist group making a retaliatory attack or two over this. Besides, wasn't the Delhi bombings in 2008 similar in casualties to this particular incident?
Anonymous
ab87c7e
?
No.387511
387512 387539
>>387477
>>387476
>>387475
>>387447
>>387432
>>387429
midwit humor
Anonymous
938b3df
?
No.387512
387518
412908356.png
>>387511
Anonymous
010e8ae
?
No.387518
387526 387528 387529 387543
E09B1C42E239A1069190761793B3D872-148831.jpg
>>387512
It used to be funny but now it's just beating a dead horse. It proves ur utter and pathetic lack of creativity. You don't belong here
Anonymous
4d89d26
?
No.387526
387547 388594 388599
7221104__safe_alternate+version_artist-colon-k-dot-+dale_imported+from+derpibooru_oc_oc+only_oc-colon-min-dash-3_pony_robot_robot+pony_unicorn_-colon-3_alternat.gif
>>387518
I do wonder what the future of culture war stuff will be like when everyone becomes numb to it, and the thinktanks behind that shit can't figure out how to make people excited for it again. Especially since short form content/social media has made it have the propensity to condense over time and people will exhaust the boilerplate faster. A lot of culture war humor got boring to me as early as highschool, and that was before tiktok and such even existed.
What will thinktanks do when jingling keys doesn't phase the audience anymore?
Anonymous
938b3df
?
No.387528
>>387518
Making fun of brown people will always be funny.
Anonymous
4aaf364
?
No.387529
>>387518
Racism is the most sophisticated form of comedy. You are simply unenlightened.
Anonymous
11bd292
?
No.387539
>>387511
If you have better, let us hear it.
Anonymous
11bd292
?
No.387543
>>387518
How's this:
Oooh, they better be careful. Remember: If you die to a nuclear bomb, you get reincarnated as a cockroach.
Anonymous
875aad0
?
No.387547
387583
>>387526
Well put 10/10 have this (you)
>387528
>387529
>387539
>387543
Federal agents get no (you)'s
Anonymous
9e9d0be
?
No.387550
387573
>>387439
Yeah, they closed the dam.
Anonymous
9e9d0be
?
No.387552
387569
>>387505
It's different now. Hindu nationalists have a majority of power and India thinks it can get a free ride now that they're infiltrating everywhere...
truth is, the world hates them now, maybe even more than people hate pakis.
Anonymous
755c460
?
No.387563
dash facehoof.png
>>387423
Oh boy, subcontinentals but now there's fucktons of them everywhere.
Anonymous
8a622ea
?
No.387564
>>387423
>world war poo
Anonymous
1869d6c
?
No.387569
387571
>>387552
I can't speak to pakis because as far as I know I've never met one in my life. Pajeets, on the other hand, somehow manage to ruin everything they touch and I'm very sick of seeing it happen.
Anonymous
9baab6e
?
No.387571
>>387569
Pakis, pajeet, bangla-desh, and around territories are all the same race, with caveats of course like koreans and japanese.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387573
387741
>>387550
Oh damn. Water war incoming.
Anonymous
c777500
?
No.387583
389371
1745581320_1.webm (2.1 MB, Resolution:404x720 Length:00:00:13, 1715606619350574.webm) [play once] [loop]
1715606619350574.webm
1745581320_2.webm (2.8 MB, Resolution:480x354 Length:00:01:07, 1714407641311995.webm) [play once] [loop]
1714407641311995.webm
1745581320_3.webm (3.8 MB, Resolution:480x852 Length:00:01:31, 1714421889031778.webm) [play once] [loop]
1714421889031778.webm
>>387547
>everyone who makes fun of jeets is a fed
Anonymous
60d78a7
?
No.387588
387600 387604
It was always inevitable. Common people divided by religious ideology. Anyone else reminded of the Levant?

One thing that always intrigued me was Attari–Wagah border ceremony (Retreat Ceremony). High-intensity military posturing.
>[YouTube] Most INTENSE Border Ceremony in the World? ATTARI 🇮🇳 WAGAH 🇵🇰 [Embed]
Currently that ceremony is suspended, due to the tensions between India and Pakistan. Fun times since both nations have nuclear weapons.
Anonymous
9baab6e
?
No.387600
387718 388361
>>387588
>Fun times since both nations have nuclear weapons.
Do you know there are strong hints that nukes are a hoax?
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387604
>>387588
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14646727/Pakistan-WAR-threat-India-nuclear-armed-rivals-exchange-fire-border-Kashmir-tourist-massacre.html

Apparently exchanging fire at the border now.
Anonymous
d32e58b
?
No.387605
387611
https://x.com/zhao_dashuai/status/1915197948528676970 [Embed]
https://fixvx.com/IranObserver0/status/1915421263876575294
India has cut off 80% of Pakistan's water. This cannot end well.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387611
387613 387615
>>387605
From the sounds of things it's not an immediate cut-off, however tearing up the treaty does mean India can build more dams and things at their end of the river which will reduce water flowing into Pakistan in future.
Anonymous
7cc2a74
?
No.387613
387614
>>387611
Guess we'll be funding the Kashmir airport
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387614
>>387613
Sounds about right for Labour. Probably give them Wales too.
Anonymous
d32e58b
?
No.387615
387616
>>387611
If they cut off Pakistan's water supply, it would be an act of war greater than any of these bombings. Losing access to the indus river would be an existential threat to Pakistan's society, causing desertification, famine and economic devastation. Pakistan would get desperate and lash out in an attempt to save themselves, because hunger/thirst eventually overcomes fear/rationality.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387616
387618 387741 387763 387767
>>387615
Yes it is a BIG problem for Pakistan. However Pakistan has also harboured terrorists fo9r decades that continue to kill people to this day that they apparently refuse to do anything about so I think now Pakistan's coices are A: Clean up their house B: nuclear war or C: Literally die of thirst.
Anonymous
4aaf364
?
No.387618
387631
>>387616
They could however use the dams they have to reduce the flow. Even a 5% reduction in water flow could be devastating.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387631
>>387618
Indeed. It's mostly desert that way.
Anonymous
68cc07b
?
No.387674
1738691244449040.gif
>>387429
thanks for the kek
Anonymous
60d78a7
?
No.387718
387796
>>387600
Visit Nagasaki sometime.
Anonymous
9e9d0be
?
No.387741
387758
>>387573
Yeah. It's going to be brutal if the water stays off. There is no other option but to fight.
>>387616
It doesn't change anything. They could have taken any other option other than this and been better off on the world stage. Now they're saying they want "the israel plan for kashmir" and to officially jeet israeli plans for gaza onto pakistan... which is not actually going to be effective at all, while ruining their image on the world stage.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387758
>>387741
>to officially jeet israeli plans for gaza onto pakistan
Sending the Palestinians to Pakistan you mean? Where did you hear this?
Anonymous
32ffa0a
?
No.387763
387769
>>387616
If it's against indians then I don't see the issue and also in favor of option B.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387767
>>387616
They won't just sit and die of thirst, and they won't just suddenly stop being savage sandpajeets either. They will choose nuclear war if it comes to that.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387769
387771
>>387763
India is also a nuclear power.
Anonymous
ec615b3
?
No.387771
387774
>>387769
So they both get nuked, and fuck up the entire hemisphere with their poocular winter while they're at it.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387774
>>387771
Certainly moots the water issue when it's suddenly all radioactive.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387777
387798 387815 387840
GpVimwSW4AArkiK.png

Anonymous
966c2d4
?
No.387796
387821
>>387718
>Nagasaki
Exactly, and Hiroshima too. There was not and there is not any radioactive measurements. Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.
Anonymous
966c2d4
?
No.387798
59cf4fdc.png
>>387777
>quads
This.
Anonymous
7544781
?
No.387815
check.png
>>387777
Check
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387821
387855
>>387796
Try visiting there. I'm sure they would love to hear your insights.
>Those are clean modern Japanese cities and according to the establishment lies, radiation would make them unsuitable for life for thousands of years.
That is not how nuclear weapons work.
Anonymous
60d78a7
?
No.387840
checked.gif
>>387777
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387855
387857 387863
>>387821
>That is not how nuclear weapons work.
Ahem. So you are saying a nuclear "detonation" will not leave any radioactive residue?
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387857
387860
>>387855
What is its half life?
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387860
387861 387863
>>387857
>What is its half life?
Ah, you mean isotope decay. Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years. You see, the decay will end when isotopes turn into inert lead.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387861
387867
>>387860
Wrong. Nuclear fallout has a half life of about 30 years. The bomb was dropped about 80 years ago.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387863
387864
>>387855
The radiation decayed over the past 80 years. It was almost entirely gone in the late 50's.
>>387860
>Well, according to "science" the decay might last tens of thousands of years.
No it fucking doesn't, you delusional midwit. You are making shit up based on nonsense you absorbed third hand through memes. Nuclear fallout from an atom bomb decays over the course of a couple decades.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387864
>>387863
It is *now*. Less so in the 50s.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387867
387869 387870 387875 387911
>>387861
>Wrong.
Seriously?
Let us see, if my instrument measured 1 rad on 1945, then, and according to you, in 1975 the reading would be 0.5 rad and in 2005, 0.25 rad.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387869
387872
>>387867
What are you asserting? No scientists say that atom bombs irradiate an area "for thousands of years". Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387870
387875
>>387867
After 30 years half of the radioactive material has decayed, again halving every 30 years. That is what half life means. Taking 90 years for ease of calculation it has halved, then halved then halved again so is now at 1/8th of what it was originally.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387872
387878
>>387869
>Nobody has ever claimed that Hiroshima and Nagasaki should still be irradiated.
Exactly, and that contradicts science. Therefore those cities were never nuked.
Just undeniable facts.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387875
387877
>>387870
Exactly what I said on >>387867
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387877
387885
>>387875
You were talking about it lasting thousands of years. Things with a half life of thousands of years are barely radioactive at all. Dangerously radioactive things have a half life in days or hours.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387878
387880 389280
>>387872
>Exactly, and that contradicts science.
What science are you referencing? We both just demonstrated to you how the radiation from the bomb would decay to irrelevant levels over the course of a few decades.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387880
387887
>>387878
>What science are you referencing?
Physics 101, the isotope chapter.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387885
387886
>>387877
>You were talking about it lasting thousands of years.
Correct, that is why Carbon 14 is a test, a very unreliable test by the way, but it works because isotope decay last millions of years.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387886
387889
>>387885
That one does. Not all radioactive materials are the same.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387887
387894 387895
half-life-formula.png
>>387880
Nigger, you should be able to do this math with a highschool level education.
Since you are so smart, write it out and tell me what number you get for the amount of time for nuclear fallout to decay to irrelevant levels.

(Spoiler alert: it's not thousands of years)
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387889
387890 387893
>>387886
>Not all radioactive materials are the same.
Sure, but in the case of Carbon 14, the test is based in a comparison between C14 and highly radioactive material.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387890
387891
>>387889
That's hardly relevant to the atom bombs dropped on Japan.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387891
387894
>>387890
Sure, but because you look like can't grasp the concept of isotope decay, kindergarten level I should apply.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387893
387896
>>387889
Carbon dating works by measuring the ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 in the sample.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387894
>>387891
Answer this >>387887 , to prove that you can actually grasp it.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387895
387903
>>387887
>Calculus
Sorry, it was so many years ago.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387896
387898
>>387893
>carbon 14 to carbon 12 in the sample.
Not in every lab.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387898
387900
>>387896
That is how it works. You absorb carbon 14 from food meaning you right now have a certain ratio of carbon 14 to carbon 12 in your body. Then you die and stop taking in carbon 14, which then slowly decays over time.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387900
387902 387903
>>387898
What about the range of uranides salts? That's way more emissions than carbon.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387902
387907
>>387900
Not sure what you mean by that. Try to say it clearer.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387903
387908 387914
>>387895
>Sorry, it was so many years ago.
So you're saying you don't actually know then?
I do. The answer is a bit over one year, with almost all of it being gone in first couple days.
>>387900
That's still not relevant to the atom bomb's fallout.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387907
>>387902
Sorry, U235 when turning into isotopes gives way to a whole range of highly radioactive elements. And if remember well, when diluted in acids are called salts.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387908
387911
>>387903

Cesium-137 half life ~30 years

Strontium-90 half life ~28 years.

Iodine-131 half life 8 days.

That's nuclear fallout.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387911
387912
>>387908
>half life
Okay, here is where you have the misunderstanding, that term "half life" is self explanatory. See >>387867 for a practical tutorial.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387912
387916 387918
>>387911
You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days. The shortest half life on that list is 8 days.
Anonymous
b8c6071
?
No.387913
Radiation is directly related to the half life though. Radiation comes from the decay of the atoms, meaning that the higher the half-life of the element, the less dangerous it is. So elements with very, very long half lifes are not actually very dangerous, at least relative to those with very short half lifes.

Sure, there are elements out there with half life's in the millions, billions, or even trillions of years, but they are barely radioactive at all.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387914
>>387903
>That's still not relevant to the atom bomb's fallout.
Of course not, but I trying to explain the periodic table to you.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387916
387917
>>387912
>You said it was almost all gone in a couple of days.
Nope, I said that never were any atomic explosion and it is actually a hoax.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387917
387918 387919
>>387916
Then you're a muppet.
Anonymous
9578a1b
?
No.387918
387923 387930
I'm tired of arguing with this boomer. He's been shitting up this board for four years now with his retardation, and I feel guilty for letting him once again bait me into derailing another good thread.
It's midnight. Hopefully the jeets nuke eachother to deatb, so we can demonstrate to the village idiot how nukes work in real time.
>>387912
You are correct. I was thinking of the dangers of acute exposure. I stand corrected.
>387914
>>>/cyb/
>>387917
Just give up. There's no reasoning with this asshole. Just look at how he behaved in the flat earth thread.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387919
387921
>>387917
Whatever, but according to "science", the facts don't add up with the "official story".
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387921
387924 387929
>>387919
You don't know the science though. You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387923
>>387918
>Hopefully the jeets nuke eachother to deatb
I hope that too, sadly it won't happen.
Anonymous
f2ace84
?
No.387924
387925 387929
>>387921
>You think that a nuke makes a place into some instant death field that nobody can enter for millennia.
That's is what the American government taught the America people in the 50s, 60s, and 70s in bibliographies and news and movies.
Anonymous
21c2ecd
?
No.387925
387929
>>387924
More like the US government was doing radiation experiments on you and told you it was only a little bit of radiation but was in fact a lot of radiation. People got sick and ever since have believe that even a little radiation is deadly.

Thread Watcher
TW