Based on the replies to the original post on there the info in the picture seems legit.
"Not a web-dev guy, but does this essentially mean they have the ability for remote code execution on your machine, via a direct socket and not through the browser?"
reply to this question:
"Yes, they have an RCE to your browser's sandbox. But surpisingly one can scan all localhost ports through this sandbox, for example..."
So be careful using that site. Best course of action is turning off pretty much everything and just lurk for new info.
171 replies and 38 files omitted.
>>386090so there I was browsing /pol/ one day like the voices told me to, and holy shit there was ponies everywhere and I knew I had to do something about this
>>386088No u (nice dubs, as you do)
enjoy.
>>386091And you have now seized the pones of production.
>>385620Interesting. I’ll take your word for it. I never went to the sharty. I mean, who knows who’s behind it? Seems sus.
>>385620The biggest issue is they are a know malicious website. They are backed by glowniggers. They groomed Solomon Henderson into a mass shooter. donkey show trannies are shitting up every board with subtle ads for their site.
>>386105>>386093Tamers12345 is being 100% astroturfed by the donkey show BTW. That's where all his inorganic support and view bots come from.
Test, donkey show. Based if it's a word filter. Or it's autocorrect.
>>386076This site is also getting shills, I don't know if it's lack of captcha or why
I've come to notice that having a captcha system (with no pass) keeps shills away. This site could benefit from a captcha system
>>386246>>3862864ch hackers are spamming here and other alt chans now that 4ch is dead.
Every single 8chan meta thread they SPAM useless debate when you ask board owners to enable IDs. They hate IDs and captchas.
>>386307>They hate [...] captchas.So do I. Especially Jewgle captchas.
>>386314Ah okay. I haven't seen their ad spam yet, but demoralizing shilling and jewish d&c style posting yes
>>386320They post sutble advertisements like
>X's board is slower than this one>I compared X to Y and X is slightly better>Anyone tried X?Etc
>>386246The British dude isn't a shill. You're just a faggot.
>>386246shills or retards, sometimes it's hard to tell which is which.
>>386286To be honest, I rather deal with the shills then dealing with captcha.
>>386352>To be honest, I rather deal with the shills then dealing with captcha.That's gonna be a controversial opinion.
Maybe if it was google recaptcha v3, then I could perhaps see myself agreeing. But a nice text-based captcha? Nah, I'd much rather less spam at the cost of spending like 5 seconds extra when making a post.
>>386364Without having checked recently, if the site captcha is anything like the Ponerpics captcha, you don't want it
>>386365Yeah, that one is based in principle but not very keyboard-able.
Unironically 4chan's captcha was not bad at all these days. The only good thing 4chan did in recent years, was actually replacing the fucking abomination for which I have no words that was recaptcha v3, with a custom made thingy that was actually surprisingly usable.
>>386333Is the soinigger site word filtered? that should be the main concern
>>386364With captcha and a 10 minute wait, 4chan was still getting spam.
The way I see it, there's no point. We'll have to deal with them as we see them.
Despite the huge number of new users, the amount of shills and spam is not that bad. And if you look at the site's statistics, the amount of users is doing down which mean there should be less shills/spammers.
>>386399Captcha didn't stop spammers and shills because they had passes. If this site had captcha and no pass, there wont be spammers or shills, because soon they'll be here too.
>>386399>We'll have to deal with them as we see them.VPN, VPS, .gov, and Indians.
They all followed the same templates too.
>I need to talk about HEEBS
>PAJEETS
>MOON CRICKETS
Help
>>386399Thats because mlpol isn't the spam and shills main target. 8moe absorbed the majority of 4chan, and /mlp/ was an exception since it was already a dead board. Just like when 8 chan (original) got too much freedom they were attacked and brought down.
You can read their status dealing with it daily, be happy that mlpol is still a niche board that isn't worth the resources... yet
https://8chan.moe/site/res/5423.html#11150 >>386440Well, to that end no one has looked at mlpol and thought "I can profit off this", and that's by design. There never has been and arguably never will be marketability or profitability in this site, other than free speech, ponies, shitposting, etc.
>>386440Damn, they really took the blunt of spammers and shills. I hope 8moe is doing well.
>>386442Horsepussy worked when /pol/ and /mlp/ and it's still working now.
Not even shills are paid enough to stare at horsepussies all day
>>385833>it's a total kike victory if 4chan remains down>hacking 4chan is them wanting to put an end to twitter/redditors getting red pilled from visiting /pol/, and further spreading the anti-semitism diease on their normiespheresNo one in the past 8 years has been getting red pilled from visiting /pol/ but they have been psyopped. The true reason why 4chan went down is because they lost their funding. They even made an april fool's joke out of it. Since 2016, 4chan survived off federal gibs (but through unofficial channels). Hence why gookmoot has been so silent ever since Trump was meme'd into office: the old US elites were pretty pissed. But he needed money to keep 4chan alive and he probably figured it was in his best interest to take a deal from US glowniggers.
In 2020 Trump lost because dems cheated. The amount of internet censorship at this time was insane. Even on 4pol you could get moderated talking about it, not consistently, but still. But to talk about the steal on normieplatforms? Impossible. And mind you, I'm not even American, I'm a Eurofag. My theory is that they first needed 4 more years of Biden to start to Ukraine war and lay the groundwork for that conflict. But after that, they would let Trump in again and crash the global economy. So far... based off of the chaos we're seeing, I think my theory holds.
But the point I'm trying to make is this: 4chan is owned by gookmoot who is not under the thumb of the pro Trump glowniggers. So that's why they simply terminated it. And they were pretty open about it: see picrel. The satanic glownigger faction knew that 4chan would be terminated at some point and that's why donkey show exists: it's the fallback base. So when they pulled the plug at 4chan, they made a nice little story about a hack. The media shilled the soyjak URL and the 4chan userbase migrated there. Go on donkey showpol right now and if you cannot unsee the similarity with 4pol.
I guarantee you that 4chan will not be back because the Trump glowniggers do not control 4chan. The Trump admin will not allow it. Simple as.
[Read more] >>386479>>386482Is it a word filter or did I miss an inside joke on mlpol?
>>386498It looks like a new wordfilter.
Party. Soyjak party. donkey show. Jarty. 'arty.
>>386502When did it get filtered? Is mlpol on bad terms with the soyjaks?
I honestly don't got any ill well or hate for the /qa/ refugees.
It was fun raiding /qa/ back in the day, I sure miss them.
>>386510I mean, donkey show is rather responsible for us all being digital refugees and if this thread is accurate they're trying to hack anyone who tries to post on their website.
>>386510>When did it get filtered?Sherty is led by bad actors; lurk more to find out why
>>386510I liked /qa/ too but even back then it was really an aquired taste. A lot of people used to hate it from the get-go because the original purpose of soijaks was as an extremely low-effort ad hominem response originating from /v/ and /pol/ and contributing zero to the discussion, and so dismissed /qa/ outright. A lot of other people just hate the style: aesthetically speaking, jaks are not made to be particularly appealing. /qa/ was also never really a place to have serious discussions; I had a friend who called it a "postmodern [s4s]", which I think is about accurate, and understandably that's not everyone's cup of tea.
The 'arty has made things worse because they've embraced the "evil shitposter counterculture" image and made spamming and raiding core parts of their culture. They've raided /mlpol/ in the past from what I'm aware. They've also had endless involvement with CP raids, discord grooming cults and all other kinds of bottom of the barrel cesspits - not necessarily guilty of it themselves but still existing in the same filthy spheres of the internet. Like the other anon says the site itself is shady and not above executing obfuscated JS and running port scans.
I still think the evolving nature of jakking is interesting to watch from the sidelines, but nowadays actually posting there is not very pleasant and I never really migrated after /qa/ was killed. Kway was fun shitposting, the party is malicious, weaponised shitposting. So I can very well understand how people who never even liked /qa/ in the first place would hate the party.
[Read more] >>386515>postmodernthat does seem to describe it
>>386515Well damn. It's really is a donkey show.
I guess I'll write them off, because it sound like they went off the deep end
>>386513honestly i dont see the problem with them emberassing the mods of 4chuck even if its fake and gay (not actually the soyteens). its more a matter of please celestia let that happen because it would be so fucking funny that mods on 4chan got pwned by retards.
>>386515>The 'arty has made things worse because they've embraced the "evil shitposter counterculture" image and made spamming and raiding core parts of their culture.I hated /b/ but seeing this makes me think they where right and people like this should have been gate kept.
>>3865274chan was a rotting corpse. It was only a matter of time until it got hacked and shut down.
>>386535>4chan was a rotting corpse.yes
>>386535>It was only a matter of time until it got hacked it wasn't
Do you actually believe a company that pays 50 000 - 200 000 dollars every month in server costs has a vulnerability like that?
>>386537>Do you actually believe a company that pays 50 000 - 200 000 dollars every month in server costs has a vulnerability like that?Maybe they should had shoveled that amount into software development so they wouldn't had codebase with decade old components with decade old vulnerabilities.
>>386538Certainly they wouldn't be offline for days trying to unfuck their shit if they had kept up with website maintenance.