/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

Funny how she looks like a monster when she squints just the right amount.

>>374873
Leaked 47th president of the United states (2025 - 2033)

>wired earphones in
>and holding the phone up to her ear
She's a terrified, drunken wreck lel

Kamala Harris: As President I will sign Reparations Bill

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tWUDHSk19Q

Once you attend the Kamala Rally, you stay at the Kamala Rally... FOREVER!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/113108859330006911
I can't wait for him to bring this up in the debates tomorrow.

>>376651
>Vote for Kamala if you want this to happen to your neighborhood
A feisty reminder that most of those faggots and bitches crying foul actually voted for it.

>>376660
>most of those faggots and bitches crying foul actually voted for it
People in Springfield Ohio voted for that? I don't believe so.

Oh shit, with Kamala is getting help from Destiny, how is Trump going to react when Kamala invites another woman to fuck her husband in front of her? Can Trump handle those kind of psychological plays?

How much liquor does this woman have in her?

How Do You Do Fellow Whites?

>>376667

You'll never guess who was capturing young black men and putting them into chains back in 1690.

>>377021
Statistically speaking….

>>377021
Jews?

>>377057
Yes. I believe it's something like 14 of the 16 big name ships used in the Afro-American slave trade were owned and operated by Jews. Worse yet is that many of the Semites acquired the ships through usury collateral.

>>377063
There was an infograph once that alleged that:
0.5% of colonials owned slaves.
Of that 0.5%, ~80% were jewish.
So yes, jews were astonishingly over-represented in both slave trading and slave ownership.

Watch here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEPdaf8459A

>cmon Brett you know what I’m talking about
>I actually don’t know what you’re talking about
Mfw

Democrats could have lost with dignity with Biden, but now they've handcuffed themselves to a dead hooker and there's no going back.

>>377673
At least with Biden they had his senility to use as an excuse

>>377675
When Harris loses they'll cry racism/sexual, but they do that all of the time so nobody will care.

>>377671
Some reddit cope

>>377677
Imagine the salt when she loses in November. I hope you guys are prepared to post it all.

>>377678
The fat lady hasn't sung yet. There's still any number of shenanigens they could try, including a hail-mary 'even more obvious than last time voting-machine' scheme that they think they can brute-force the population into accepting.

ESPECIALLY if there's a convenient an urgent crisis (((somewhere))) "demanding immediate/ongoing" executive action/oversight. This doesn't feel like a final form

How bad do you think the internal polling is right now? The current year man just released this:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CkK3W0lOKcc&pp=ygULam9obiBvbGl2ZXI%3D

>>377681
>How bad do you think the internal polling is right now?
Probably worse than external polls, which show a toss-up tie Trump's slight favor (within margin of error, so don't get complacent).
>The current year man just released this:
Yeah, I've been seeing shit like this since last week. Democrats know it's quite possible, perhaps even probable, that they are going to lose this election, so they're already downplaying themer failure and calling the system rigged. I've been seeing the "why the electoral college is unfair" articles popping up too, which is an early sign of cope.
For the past 4 years Democrats have screamed at Republicans for being "election deniers", but in reality they have been doing the same shit for at least 20 years since Bush's narrow victory, if not longer than that. We all remember the bullshit Russiagate nonsense that wasn't grounded in reality.

>>377682
I still run into people who swear up and down that Gore won the 2000 election, and they're still legitimately angry about it.

>>377679
>>377680
it's possible, but those kinds of tricks only work when the margins are thin enough that dumping a few thousand extra mail in ballots into a couple of key districts can swing the election. If they cheat so obviously that even normies can tell it's not going to do them much good. And if they're going to try the "crisis" angle it would need to be something pretty huge that we haven't seen before. I doubt the "pandemic" trick would work again.

The other thing to consider is that even if they do pull off a win, either legitimately or not, they're still stuck with this babbling dimwit as president for 4 years. The only thing motivating and holding the democrat coalition together at this point is hating Trump, so as soon as they don't have him to kick around anymore they basically own the whole dumpster fire.

>>377683
>those kinds of tricks only work when the margins are thin enough that dumping a few thousand extra mail in ballots into a couple of key districts can swing the election
UNLESS there's also an emergency military conflict/action. You really think they won't play the "unprecedented emergency" card like they did LAST election, and then just railroad in all the shenanigens?
It's possible that crying normies and an increasingly discontent, militant, and (cuz it's wartime powers) treasonous voting majority is part of the plan

Not to sound paranoid but if you identify for and prepare for the worst, while you won't be best prepared/positioned to take full advantage of the best-case circumstantial outcome, you will be better off proportionately with how much worse the circumstantial outcome is

>>377686
How are you preparing? You're giving a lot of what-if scenarios, but no word on how we should respond, let alone how you are preparing.

>>377687
Without knowing the scope youre trying to address:
- Seek to have a not-electrically-dependent supply of food capable of lasting anywhere from two weeks to a few months
- Establish/maintain a rapport with neighbors to facilitate barter and reapurce sharing if needed
- Starlink, niggers