/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>372571
Cucker Carlgoy epitomizes the swinging-centrist shill. Back when he was the primetime star on FoxJews (Rupert Murdoch's biggest doublethink media channel), he was best friends with (((Glenn Beck))).
You might know that name in passing but if not: Beck is a rabid pro-pissrahell quarter-jew, or less. Of course, he's a mormon. Of course, he can't OPENLY say he loves big daddy government preaching orders, or that mormons do the same, though the context is there.

This is the latest attempt at trying to "appear" being a neutral, intelligent paid actor.

>>372571
I was thinking, what Tucker is doing is a two tier op. On one hand he is exposing the jews, on the other hand he is pushing the concept of civic nationalism, I mean, he is eroding the fact that the American Nation has European roots by equalizing different races under the scope of christianity.
Zog is permitting criticism of the jews and the gatekeepers are in full swing gathering the normies under the christian banner, all which makes me wonder what they have plotted.
Also Tucker has been seen wearing a kabbalistic red string, which is jewish mysticism or sorcery, so he is on the opposite side of Christ's teachings.

>>372619
>kabbalistic red string
I've heard about the red band on 4/pol/, but imo it looks like bullshit for me. I think it's probably just a marker that the Russian government gave him so that the police didn't gun him down for being a foreign journalist. He hasn't worn that thing in any other context; and if it really were a kabbalistic symbol, why would they have him wear it on TV? The kikes who run the media are experienced with TV: if they wanted to keep occult symbolism hidden, they absolutely could. It's just a distraction, imo.
>Zog is permitting criticism of the jews
No, it's more like they've lost control of the narrative around Israel, because barefaced genocide isn't as easy to cover up as it was in the 20th century. Notice that any criticism of Jews themselves, instead of just Zionism, immediately gets shut down in the pro Palestine circles.
>gathering the normies under the christian banner
Tucker is doing the opposite right now though: he's fragmenting the American "Christian" narrative that has for decades been unequivocally been pro-Israel. American Evangelicals are the biggest supporters of Israel because the media sold them a myth that they could speedrun the apocalypse if they gave the Jews more money; calling that mythos into question could make American support for Israel disintegrate in a matter of years.
Imo, this is actually pretty risky, not only because it puts him on the ZOG hit list, but also because it alienates him from mainstream conservatives. I agree that there's some suspicion to it, but to me the real suspicion is why he would go so far and put his neck on the line to shake up conservative media, because I always saw him as a grifter. Maybe he thinks he'll get a huge audience from these stunts once his (((non-competitive contract))) with (((Fox))) expires and he's allowed to work in media again.
>On one hand he is exposing the jews, on the other hand he is pushing the concept of civic nationalism, I mean, he is eroding the fact that the American Nation has European roots
Yeah, he's a civic nationalist, but imo not anymore than any other mainstream conservatives are. He's just slightly more to the right of normie conservatives. I think he's still done some semi-decent work in getting American conservatives to oppose mass immigration and white replacement, even if he is just a grifter. I would say he's "eroding" it so much as he's refusing to go to the extreme for risk of losing his normies audience, but lately he's been getting increasingly edgy and doing things that the MSM wouldn't dare to do (like with the Russia visit, or this focus on Israelis murdering Christians).
Libs will of course tell you that he's a white nationalist and a Nazi, but in reality he's just a normie who seems slightly fed up with how American "conservatives" refuse to conserve anything other than Israel, and probably sees a media career in appealing to an audience that has the same attitude.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think Tucker is anyone's savior. As I said before, he's a grifter. At face-value though, challenging the undying loyalty to Israel that has metastasized among American Christians is quite the interesting development.

>>372620
>calling that mythos into question could make American support for Israel disintegrate in a matter of years.
How is that a bad thing?

>>372767
It's not a bad thing. It's a good thing.

>>372767
It's good.
I hope it catches on. Data shows that young evangelicals are much less likely to support Israel than older ones. American Christian support for Israel could be a passing fad.

Are alphabet niggers funding pro-Palestinian protests behind the scenes to make them as obnoxious as possible and turn people towards Israel?

>>372952
>Are alphabet niggers funding pro-Palestinian protests
Well, those protesters were antifa/BLM assets before, so it make sense they have been repurposed now.

>>372952
I doubt it. The regime doesn't benefit from these protests at all.
>>372955
Just because they funded BLM/Antifa doesn't mean they're controlling them now.

>>372959
>Just because they funded BLM/Antifa doesn't mean they're controlling them now.
If ZOG funded BLM/Antifa before, then why not now? Those militias gotta get paid somehow, what better opportunity than this one.

>>372967
Why would they be making them oppose Israel? What's the benefit in that.
It seems more to me like they've lost control because for decades they've had leftoids put brown people on a pedestal.

>>372968
>Why would they be making them oppose Israel? What's the benefit in that.
Controlled chaos.
Also the same "why" question applies, for example, to Musk taking over Twatter and opening the gates on criticism of the jews among many other topics. This is not random and points out to a greater plot.

>>372968
Making them as obnoxious as possible "stirs the pot" for the anti-semitism angle and gets normies to oppose them. You wouldn't want to support the side that breaks the law and makes you late to work. Yes, the conduct of protestors is a completely different issue than the actual conflict they're protesting, but normies don't care.

>>372969
Musk is definitely influenced but I doubt he's controlled. Opening up Twatter has certainly hurt the establishment quite a bit.

>>372971
>Musk is definitely influenced but I doubt he's controlled
He is literally a top military contractor and to enter in that club full adherence to zog is required.
Would you like to reconsider your point of view?

>>372972
>He is literally a top military contractor and to enter in that club full adherence to zog is required.
He gave the Pentagon a headache when he got antsy over Starlink being a potential military target and kept hesitating to turn it on when Ukraine captured cities. Right now they're reconsidering how much power they gave to an impulsive autist like him.

>>372971
>Making them as obnoxious as possible "stirs the pot" for the anti-semitism angle and gets normies to oppose them.
It's failing on that end then. Support for Israel is in freefall among normies. They're about to lose an entire generation of supporters.
>You wouldn't want to support the side that breaks the law and makes you late to work.
The BLM riots were far more disruptive. This is mostly contained on college campuses.
>Musk is definitely influenced but I doubt he's controlled. Opening up Twatter has certainly hurt the establishment quite a bit.
Yeah, that's my opinion of him.

>>372571
Nobody has anything to say about the video itself?
Let's stay on topic here.