29 replies and 4 files omitted.
why is the internet so dead.
where in the fuck did everyone go?
This. The Internet has also been raped to death by corpos/pozzed govs.
sad times friends
the good news is that the current path isn't sustainable
time to continue the search
What is this about? Let's find out.>Intra-body nano-network - Brief summary by Mik Andersen
I'm not reading all that shit. Nanobots from vaccines has been a schizo talking point for a long time. Take your meds.
>>362824>I'm not reading all that shit.
Ah, now your point of view makes totally sense,
It a pdf of the same schizo talking points with no real sources behind it. Again take your meds.
You make extreme claims like their are nanobots in the vaccine you need to provide some pretty convincing evidence. The voices in your head aren't enough to convince me.
Let me put this way. How do you know there are not nanobots in the injections?
Because we don't have nanotechnology that advanced yet.
Because we would see it in consumer products and military applications if we did.
Allow me to redpill you. The lack of publicity is NOT a real hint on the advances on the field.
Video clip from 60 (sixty) years ago.
Then do you have some substantial proof that this technology is real?
Old corona-chan threads featuring videos from the Pentagon and vaccine manufacturing CEO's describing 'new capabilities".
Dig them well anon.
Also I want to point out that such technology (the stuff in the video) was already being used on mental patients at the time. Brain implants today require surgery there is nothing close to nanotech used in brain implants.>>362844
I highly doubt the pentagon and ceos are talking about putting nanobots in people. And those threads are full of schizo shit.
Also there is another video of a presentation at the WEF describing mind reading and monitoring. I don't remember well, but it might be at the Great Reset threads.
>>362845>(the stuff in the video)
Watch it again because it says that implants are left behind for wireless tech, in the 60s.
Things like electrodes in the brains were experimental at the time. They also experimented with magnetic fields at the time.
Those threads are just 2 more weeks cope. It's been 2 years and the the vaccinated still aren't dead, or posthuman cyborgs, or zombies. Go back to your schizo containment thread.
I've been in those threads, anon. They are schizo shit. Like flat earth tier conspiracies.
>>362852>They are schizo shit. Like flat earth tier conspiracies.
So far all those conspiracies are factually true. Go figures.
Then where are the mountains of dead vaxxies?
Keep lying and gaslightying fren. The excuse of "I'm not reading all that shit" is not flying any longer.
Not him, but he does raise a fair point, why aren't they all dead yet?
Either you people are living under a rock and in permanent denial, or, you're paid shills. What is it?
Brother i am simply asking you a question, no reason to be so hostile.
Well, there are many corona-chan threads documenting the death toll. Don't tell me you didn't see them.
What Anon seems to be arguing is that nothing in those threads indicates that the vaxxies are dying off en masse, or that the vax is lethal to everyone who takes it. Let's just say for the sake of simplicity that every anecdote in those threads is 100% accurate and all of these mysterious sudden deaths were directly caused by the vaccine. This still doesn't prove everyone who takes the vax is going to die from it. If that were the case, we should be seeing massive numbers of people dying, like millions at a time. Again, not even the MSM could cover up something that obvious; there should be mountains of corpses everywhere. At best, all we have so far is circumstantial evidence suggesting that the vaccine may be lethal to certain people under certain conditions.
Ironically, the alt-narrative about the vax is actually similar to the official narrative about the virus itself. Corona-chan didn't actually kill that many people, but it did kill some people. So the government and media and so forth hyped up the 0.02 percent of the population who died from this virus while basically ignoring the 99.98 percent who didn't. They also blatantly ignored the fact that the virus seemed to mostly be lethal to people who were either very old or had comorbidities. The antivax crowd is falling victim to a similar type of hysteria, where a small number of vaccine deaths are being treated as evidence that the vaccine is lethal to everyone who takes it.
Bear in mind I'm not trying to take a pro-vax stance here. The vaccine is at the very least a highly suspicious drug and it's obvious the govt and pharmaceutical companies are not being honest about the risks. Since Corona isn't that terrible of an illness in the first place, it's probably best to just err on the side of caution and not take the vax unless you absolutely have to for some reason. However, if it were really as dangerous as some of the more extreme schizo-theories suggest, there should logically be mountains of corpses all over the place, since the majority of people did take the vax. The fact that there isn't suggests that these theories are either inaccurate or exaggerated.
>>362880>Since Corona isn't that terrible of an illness in the first place
Corona doesn't exist. The whole virology science is a fraud and doesn't follow the Scientific Method, therefore virologists are well paid quacks.
>>362845>I highly doubt the pentagon and ceos are talking about putting nanobots in people. And those threads are full of schizo shit.
Actually it is not about nanobots, but a network of radio-electric antennas to interact with and influence humans.>>362849>Things like electrodes in the brains were experimental at the time. They also experimented with magnetic fields at the time.
Is the PDF in question correct? Let's find out.
By the way, /mlpol/ is always right.
What the lady was talking about was an EEG (ear eeg) not a wireless mind control device. The closest things to what you are talking about would be tFUS and rTMS, but those you need to be right next to the person for those to work.
Why don't you just answer the question instead of flinging shit like a retarded nigger? That's a completely normal question that would arise when you assert that the vaccine kills people.>>362872
I've seen plenty of posts claiming that the vaccine was engineered to depopulate the planet or kill people en mass, but aside from a few blood clots (which does support that it's untested and unsafe, but not that it's a death sentence), I haven't seen very many people actually die from it; and anyone who makes that observation would ask those very same questions. Most of the people in in country took the vaccine, but most of them haven't actually died, and if they really were dying at even a 1% rate you'd be seeing mass graves all over the country.>>362880>Anon seems to be arguing is that nothing in those threads indicates that the vaxxies are dying off en masse, or that the vax is lethal to everyone who takes it.>if it were really as dangerous as some of the more extreme schizo-theories suggest, there should logically be mountains of corpses all over the place, since the majority of people did take the vax. The fact that there isn't suggests that these theories are either inaccurate or exaggerated.
I'm not asserting that there's no danger to taking the vaccine, but I'm tired of retards exaggerating it. When you shit-up conversations with untrue/unsupported nonsense, it poisons the well and turns away people who came looking for truth that opposes the media narrative, so it's important to be consistent and clear about these kinds of things. I'm so tired of seeing piles of untrue/exaggerated schizo bullshit all over discussions of vaccine skepticism, because it's annoying to sift through for shreds of accurate information and retards shit up the entire discussion and turn away sensible skeptics.
Sometimes I wonder if it's by design, and maybe glownigs or other bad actors intentionally flood Facebook groups and other forums with schizo nonsense about the vaccine just to poison the well, to keep skeptics distracted and to prevent normies from questioning the mainstream narrative. It's been a tried and true method for them about other topics.
Even if you assert that it doesn't exist, that's beside Anon's point that they intentionally ignored statistics of its fatality and who was effected by it. Even if it were a fictional virus, it would still be a very mild virus that only caused severe illness in the elderly.
Forgot the memes to go with the glownigger tactics line
>>362881>The whole virology science is a fraud
Oh good grief, not this nonsense again. Take your meds.
Sorry elon you're not putting anything in my brain
Nothing in your brain yet.