I want to make a serious attempt at trying to convince you of something controversial.
You're going to have a strong emotional reaction but bear with it.
Think of how retarded leftists look when they talk about racism as an inherent undefendable evil, anyone arguing against it is de facto wrong even before they open their mouth.
They've been psyoped over generations into thinking that loving your own people is an inherent evil, they see it as an axiom, and they're 100% emotionally and morally invested into it.
Don't be like that. Everything is open to question.
Child marriage was an historical norm. It was always seen as acceptable.
>Child marriages involving only one marriage partner below the age of 18, usually the female, are also quite common. Throughout history till the 20th century, child marriages were the norm in most parts of the world
>Girls were usually married off as soon as they reached puberty or sometimes even prior to that
>In 1880, the ages of consent were set at 10 or 12 in most states, with the exception of Delaware where it was 7.
>Age of Consent throughout history has usually coincided with the age of puberty although at sometimes it has been as early as seven. Early on age of consent was a familial or tribal matter and only became a legal one in the Greco-Roman period. The Roman tradition served as the base for Christian Europe as well as the Christian Church itself which generally, essentially based upon biological development, set it at 12 or 14 but continued to set the absolute minimum at seven