hey guys
I want to get dox of 4chan mods
I hate them
always banned
action of happen.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
>>343638
>invisibro
Been a long time since that name popped up around here. Prolly an exercise in futility OP, be careful you dont end up in someone's crosshairs.
>invisibro
Been a long time since that name popped up around here. Prolly an exercise in futility OP, be careful you dont end up in someone's crosshairs.
>>343638
ACM Code of Ethics Rule 1.6: “Respect privacy.”
ACM Code of Ethics Rule 1.7: “Honor confidentiality.”
Twitter Private Information and Media Policy: “You may not publish or post other people's private information without their express authorization and permission. We also prohibit threatening to expose private information or incentivizing others to do so.”
Not without making sure either you are banned or discredited in the process or the others at 4chan are dishonored as well.
ACM Code of Ethics Rule 1.6: “Respect privacy.”
ACM Code of Ethics Rule 1.7: “Honor confidentiality.”
Twitter Private Information and Media Policy: “You may not publish or post other people's private information without their express authorization and permission. We also prohibit threatening to expose private information or incentivizing others to do so.”
Not without making sure either you are banned or discredited in the process or the others at 4chan are dishonored as well.
Frenly rem8nder that for all his faults and misdeeds (honestly, good luck determining either) Invisibro DID participate integrally to the development of this site, at least in the early days.
>>343672
That’s a different Invisbro. The guy in the OP is a 4chan mod from many years ago. The guy you are thinking of is an Army reject who stole the other guy’s handle.
That’s a different Invisbro. The guy in the OP is a 4chan mod from many years ago. The guy you are thinking of is an Army reject who stole the other guy’s handle.
Does anyone have the post from the former mod claiming that all of 4chan's moderators were fired and replaced in 2014, and the new mods were required to dox themselves to site management? This might have been two different posts, I don't remember.
>>346039
That
That
>>346356
I dont but I remember it well enough to explain. Around 2014, moot started requiring ID from mods. Then he "sold" 4chan around 2015 and that rule was rescinded. It was a take over, either they forced moot to hand it over or they gave him hush money. gookmoot controlls nothing. It's actually the moderation in charge of everything in the site. OP can barely speak english so I doubt he'll have any luck doing anything to the mod staff. They definitely deserve a few TNT blocks sent to their Minecraft bases.
I dont but I remember it well enough to explain. Around 2014, moot started requiring ID from mods. Then he "sold" 4chan around 2015 and that rule was rescinded. It was a take over, either they forced moot to hand it over or they gave him hush money. gookmoot controlls nothing. It's actually the moderation in charge of everything in the site. OP can barely speak english so I doubt he'll have any luck doing anything to the mod staff. They definitely deserve a few TNT blocks sent to their Minecraft bases.
7 replies | 1 files | 7 UUIDs | Archived