/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
Note: JS is reccomended to be able to post effortlessly, but I am working on a system where that won't be needed.

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

1630910850867.jpg
OpSec
Anonymous
ce18f3b
?
No.319576
319578 319740 319904
I can't post on forchen because of ""rangeban"" so i will post here instead.
I will advise all of you against saving just about any picture off a chan, for pictures can be backtracked to threads/places within a certain lifespan, think of it as a watermark but hidden. The less shared a picture is, the more likely it is to backtrack it to it's source.
Some pictures might be purposely "marked" by an user or group in an attempt to profile certain users of interest (for example, repost a picture you downloaded from a chan in any site that is not a chan and now you have succesfully entered the watchlist of suspects for further analysis)

I'm just throwing this out here, i don't believe there are many users of interest on mlpol nor on chans in general, but if you value your opsec, be very mindful of this fact and try not to repost pictures on non-anon sites, at least do not do so if said pictures are "fresh"

Unrelated khajiit picture cause khajiit cares about this little community.
Anonymous
52d0da7
?
No.319578
319580
>>319576
Thanks OP, I'm aware of the database ZOG is running and the private 3rd parties collecting sources and dates to feed such a db.
They collect the pic, hash and name. I'm not aware if they have the manpower to tag them.
It looks like they got upset when anons pass the pics through an graphic editor and the hash changes, making their filters useless.
Anonymous
e0efcea
?
No.319580
319581 319582
>>319578
how do you get one of these hash-breakers
Anonymous
18411d1
?
No.319581
319582 319584 320130
>>319580
Just open the image with Paint, for example, and modify a couple of pixels, that's enough to change the hash.
But there's a catch, the jews have invested* in, according to them, artificial intelligence; this is a fancy term to describe algorithms meant to recognize similar images. For example, the algorithms can recognize the same image at different resolutions (sizes), also some are able to read the text and inject it into other algorithm which will trigger an event if some key words or phrases are present. They are getting more sophisticated every year, but they are unable to recognize subtle innuendos like "implying", "irony", or "sarcasm".

*invested= actually the fuckers are taking open source projects and scale them for their needs, also they wrap them with a proprietary GUI and obfuscate the code to charge millions for the software license.
Anonymous
272334d
?
No.319582
319611
>>319580
Changing a bit of the image, reencoding it as jpg insted of png, will be enough to change the hash. But if they use watermarks or something it could probably be a bit more tricky. I would assume saving it as jpg if png and visa versa would destroy the watermark but I am not that familiar with all the techniques used to embed watermarks and how to destroy them.
Also what >>319581 said.
Anonymous
52d0da7
?
No.319584
>>319581
>Just open the image with Paint, for example, and modify a couple of pixels, that's enough to change the hash.
Also cropping and resizing will do the trick.
Anonymous
8cf50b1
?
No.319611
32.png
>>319582
>I would assume saving it as jpg if png and visa versa would destroy the watermark
This.
JPG as its core is a compression algorithm, change the compression rate and any hidden watermark will be destroyed.
Anonymous
d75dfff
?
No.319740
320128
>>319576
Friend, it's a picture. Worry about something else
Anonymous
19e4fd0
?
No.319743
>All these recommendations that deliberately degrade image quality.
>a chan
>reposting anything from here somewhere that has your real name
>thinking you're not already on a list just for viewing the site
Anonymous
65206f4
?
No.319904
>>319576
Thank you.
Anonymous
14ad6be
?
No.320128
>>319740
I'm just saying anon, don't have to go all conspiracy theory on this shit but you should be careful what images you post where because some images can be backtracked to the post where you posted said image and if someone really really really wants to keep track of a certain user or users, this can be exploited.
Of course, not everyone will be "lucky" enough to be a person of interest tho
It is just a good thing to keep in mind, pictures are usually overlooked when talking about OpSec.
Anonymous
662e10e
?
No.320130
00f4ebf72850cf712990627ad8c6f8c9.png
>>319581
There are a ton of software out there that finds duplicates, from files to images and I personally use them both just to go over the sheer amounts of Porn on my hard drive. XnView MP even comes with this software built in and is free. Oh and I can use it to organize and tag my Porn too.

Because there is no such thing as too much horse pussy to keep the normies away.