Banking and Finance:
Robert S. Kapito - Founder and President of BlackRock https://archive.is/acEYm
Larry Fink - Co-Founder and Chairman/CEO of BlackRockhttps://archive.is/5A3j6
Lloyd Blankfein - Senior Chairman of Goldman Sachshttps://archive.is/WDcyR
David M. Solomon - Chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachshttps://archive.is/IdDKW
Gary Gensler - Chairman of Wells Fargohttps://archive.is/GuKri
Stephen A. Schwarzman - Chairman and CEO of The Blackstone Grouphttps://archive.is/thYxp
David Rubenstein - Co-Executive Chairman of The Carlyle Group https://archive.is/S2x2
David Bonderman - Co-Founder and Co-Owner of TPG Capital https://archive.is/Ne2T2
Marc Rowan - Co-Founder and CEO of Apollo Global Management https://archive.is/vHSjO
Josh Harris - Co-Founder and Senior Managing Director of Apollo Global Managementhttps://archive.is/SDJmq
Joshua Bekenstein - Co-Chairman of Bain Capitalhttps://archive.is/h6jIV
Cliff Asness - CEO of AQR Capital Managementhttps://archive.is/gUBqh
David Kabiller - CFA of AQR Capital Managementhttps://archive.is/yk7xI
Israel Englander - CEO of Millennium Managementhttps://archive.is/29Zxr
James H. Simons - Co-Founder of Renaissance Technologieshttps://archive.is/CPKnf
Peter Fitzhugh Brown - CEO of Renaissance Technologieshttps://archive.is/XCbWw
Seth Klarman - CEO of Baupost Grouphttps://archive.is/O6EAf
Paul Singer - Co-CEO of Elliott Management Corporationhttps://archive.is/rooVy
Mark Wiseman - Chair of the Alberta Investment Management Corporationhttps://archive.is/wpv8h
693 replies and 343 files omitted.
>>319954>>319956>>319957>a "beacon of morality to shine upon the world">deifying people>and cherry-picking responses
Isn’t Voltaire’s opinion on Jews a topic of debate? And his IQ means nothing, especially if it was used to justify eugenics and it only tests how good one is at taking the IQ test. And by the way, I’m also a card-carrying Mensa member, but it was partially due to the fact that I was forced to take the test in high school.
>>320036>excuse me as I attempt to appeal to authority with no veritas>mensa
Yeah, me too. Oddly enough, I dont have to resort to rhetoric, manipulative tactics, gaslighting, and a slough of other bad-faith argumentation to try and assery my position.
Jesus fuck, it was nice when staff got rid of such obvious and disingenuous "totally-not-shills"
What do you have against eugenics?
Evolution is reality.
Evolution is defined by a single crude tool named failure. With Eugenics, man can define success.
A foolish society holds the best whites back for the sake of inferior races. A wise society that wants greater whites ensures they reproduce more than any genetic inferiors.
You parasitic genetic failures loathe the idea of eugenics because you rely on lowest-common-denominator votes outnumbering their genetic superiors. You're afraid of men who question the status quo that puts the need of lesser races before the needs of whites.
If man started to ask himself whether all life is fit to live, you know what he'd say about you.
If we had eugenics, it would mean that people’s constitutional rights as citizens would be violated and that prejudices would develop against what would be considered second- or even third-class citizens. It would mean we become more divided as a society and those who want to crush us would have an easier time.
We have already seen the evils of eugenics as a society and we know we should not go back.
>>320038>it was nice when staff got rid of such obvious and disingenuous "totally-not-shills"
He is here to waste your time, I don't understand why everyone is baiting.
"I have been to Moscow, Russia, to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Tokyo, Japan, to Tehran, Iran, to Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates, and all across Canada. During those travels I have met some of the richest people on the planet and some of the poorest people as well. I have met world leaders and distinguished industrialists and financiers and diplomats and academics--not to mention 'regular' folks from all walks of life. And if there is one thing I can say with unqualified certainty, it is this: 'They' do not 'hate us', as the Jewish propagandists in the media are forever proclaiming. Rather, if I heard it said once, I heard it said a hundred times: 'We don't hate America. We don't hate the American people. What we do hate is the way the Jewish agenda is being carried out through the American government to wage war all over the planet. We hope the American people will stand up and fight and take back their country before the world is destroyed.' It is as simple as that." - Michael Collins Piper
/mlpol/: “We encourage free discussion on our boards.”
Also /mlpol/: “Everyone whom we don’t agree with ought to be sterilized.”
Which is it?
You need to be sterilized
Jews are stupid and they make bad arguments in bad faith. While I personally believe free humans should never be censored, Jews believe whites should never be free humans.
No, I just want you to be sterilized so you can't breed in more traitors that would still stand in solidarity with Israel even if they nuked us tomorrow. No one else, just you.
Why do the genetically inferior always call Eugenics morally wrong, anyway?
This is one planet, and it's small. There's only so much room to go around. There's only so much space to farm. There are only so many hours in a day to spend farming food and shipping it around our tiny globe.
So why should whites be a minority when the world relies on their back-breaking labour to survive? Why should white farmers labour for hours to feed STD-ridden feral gorillas in Africa with ten children each and less intelligence than the average Dog?
Eugenics, Dysgenics, it doesn't matter what you call it. Artificial pressures are restricting white birth rates and encouraging the unsustainable production of niggers who cannot feed themselves, behave themselves, or wipe their own asses.
If you had a moral principle against eugenics no matter what, you would hate how it is currently used.
You just fear losing your undeserved privileges and unearned comforts.
But what actions are being taken to make sure that doesn’t happen? Freedom of speech is one thing, but actions have consequences.>>320054
But there is no guarantee that my children won’t think along the same lines as you.>>320055>Why do the genetically inferior always call Eugenics morally wrong, anyway?
Who determines what is superior and inferior? All humans are susceptible to genetic-related diseases in some way and there is no such thing as being genetically perfect. If there were, we would all be single-celled life forms floating in the oceans. And why would these people advocate for their own deaths or sterilizations?
I don't care, the last thing we need is more treacherous vermin like you that subvert society and love Israel more than your host country. You are a parasite.
Funny how often jews cry "Fuck freedom of speech, speech we don't like has consequences" with a straight face.
You're pathetic tyrannical pedophiles making every person on this planet hate you with your kung flu scam and you're talking to us about consequences?
>>320065>Funny how often jews cry "Fuck freedom of speech, speech we don't like has consequences" with a straight face.
Not unlike this site?>You're pathetic tyrannical pedophiles making every person on this planet hate you with your kung flu scam and you're talking to us about consequences?
Not unlike this site posting porn of a show for little girls and talking about sterilization?
Absolutely assmad ziotraitor, go fuck off to Israel if you wanna whore yourself out to them and sell out your host country. Rat.
Just a rundown on who benefited the most from the looting of South Africa:
Cecil Rhodes was sent by the Rothschild family to purchase diamond mines in South Africa using loans from their banks, he was the founder of De Beers and subsequently 50% of the profit from De Beers went to the Rothschild familyhttps://archive.is/tzkIx
Barney Barnato - Founder of JCI Limited (Jewish) https://archive.is/yN0QM
Gabi Tolkowsky - Diamond cutter for Centenary Diamond (Jewish) https://archive.is/l7PrJ
Alfred Beit - Life-governor of De Beers (Jewish) https://archive.is/XFDQH
Sir Carl Meyer, 1st Baronet - Deputy Chairman of De Beers (Jewish) https://archive.is/N7rtJ
Ernest Oppenheimer - Chairman of De Beers and founder of Anglo American (Jewish) https://archive.is/ORnp4
Harry Oppenheimer - Chairman of De Beers and Anglo American (Jewish) https://archive.is/JDmHt
George Albu - Co-Founder of Gencor Ltd (Jewish) https://archive.is/PzxTj
Leopold Albu - Co-Founder of Gencor Ltd (Jewish) https://archive.is/PzxTj
Otto Beit - Developer of the Rand Gold Mines (Jewish) https://archive.is/ZxbFa
Diamond Trading Company - Owned by De Beers https://web.archive.org/web/20210525052812/https://www.debeersgroup.com/~/media/Files/D/De-Beers-Group/documents/reports/insights/the-diamond-insight-report-2018.pdf
Out of the 32 Randlords, 15 are Jewish; the remaining 17 are Gentiles https://archive.is/9DOSq
Sir George Albu, 1st Bt (1857–1935) (Jewish) https://archive.is/PzxTj
Leopold Albu (1861–1938) (Jewish) https://archive.is/PzxTj
Barney Barnato (1852–1897) (Jewish) https://archive.is/yN0QM
Alfred Beit (1853–1906) (Jewish) https://archive.is/XFDQH
Sir Otto Beit, 1st Bt (1865–1930) (Jewish) https://archive.is/ZxbFa
Gustav Imroth (1862–1946) (Jewish) https://archive.is/xJeO8
Solomon Joel (1865–1931) (Jewish) https://archive.is/Q6Bak
Woolf Joel (1863–1898) (Jewish) https://archive.is/xqvKM
Isaac Lewis (1849–1927) (Jewish) https://archive.is/ha8rF
Samuel Marks (1843–1920) (Jewish) https://archive.is/tG4zZ
Sir Carl Meyer (1851–1922) (Jewish) https://archive.is/N7rtJ
Maximilian Michaelis (1852–1932) (Jewish) https://archive.is/90Zar
Sigmund Neumann (1857–1916) (Jewish) https://archive.is/xqvKM
Sir Lionel Phillips, 1st Bt (1855–1936) (Jewish) https://archive.is/p57cP
Jules Porgès (1838–1921) (Jewish) https://archive.is/iuK3C
Old video from 2014 exposing the 2014 "Hamas human shield" manual as an IDF forgery
Even if they were "human shields", it's still a warcrimes to attack civilians.
The entire point of the video was debunking the entire "human shield" narrative, the only evidence that the IDF has promoting it is an obviously forged document that they eventually removed from their site out of embarrassment.
>>320073>>320074>“Oh, no! A manual published using a printing press or typed in a computer has perfectly spaced lines, just as it’s supposed to! It was also scanned by a machine that did a very good job and had a setting to deskew the pages! This document is obviously forged!”
What the actual f*
ck has this anti-Israel cause come to?
>>320083>Unskewed text on a skewed page>Not a forgery
Ultra cope from the ziotraitor
So the page itself being skewed without the text proves the great Jewish conspiracy? How could that be true if that happens with all documents like that? Both the text and the page can’t be deskewed.
>>320094>The IDF forging a document is evidence that Jews run the world
No one said that, that was something you made up as a strawman argument. And the example image you posted has skewed text that matches the skew of the paper alongside scanlines that match the skew of the paper, the IDF document has neither. Nice try though.
You don't understand how physics works either. See when a folded floppy piece of paper has lines on it is curved the perspective shift of those lines change.
Crazy that doing that could change the ink on it instead of the ink lifting right off the page to T-pose on the scanner.
That means instead of a 2D object like the fake text, the 3D object has depth and perspective to take into account.
Your pics show exactly how much you don't understand.
OC for the thread - it's kinda out of rhythm and shit but it's 2 am here.
Die lösung der judenfrage - (the solution of the jewish question)
Who says it wasn’t just someone’s hair getting stuck in there?
The skew of the page also seemed to be uneven in places. It seems to not be possible to determine beyond a reasonable doubt that this accusation is true.
>>320109>Random accusation with no proof
That's not evidence, it's speculation which cannot be proven or disproven, this is a clear cut logical fallacy. Like 90% of your arguments have been for three months. >inb4 BUT YOU DO THAT TOO
Your original argument was that someone completely unrelated outside of this board used logical fallacies to back up their arguments so it justified you using logical fallacies to back up your arguments, but now you've changed it to that we do it too so it justifies you being intentionally disingenuous and lying through your teeth. I have the memory of an elephant, I don't forget these things. >>320111>I-It's not true!
No, it is. According to the official IDF website of an archive of the page they released they found the document like this just laying around a Hamas hideout after they raided it (what a stroke of good luck) so the official document that was printed out was not made digitally but was produced physically as in something you could hold with your hands and read (According to the IDF themselves) I'll even quote from their official website on the release of the document for you:
"IDF forces in the Gaza Strip found a Hamas manual on “Urban Warfare,” which belonged to the Shuja’iya Brigade of Hamas’ military wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades. The manual explains how the civilian population can be used against IDF forces and reveals that Hamas knows the IDF is committed to minimizing harm to civilians." - So their official claim is that this document was printed out on REAL paper and was seized by the IDF, it was NEVER produced digitally like you said it was. https://www.idf.il/en/articles/hamas/captured-hamas-combat-manual-explains-benefits-of-human-shields/
And again, if this was a legitimate document that they found in a Hamas hideout produced on real paper (like they claim) the supposed text would bend over the curve here that's marked by discoloration, but it doesn't; and furthermore the text on this document does not skew at all despite the document being skewed itself on the front page. But then there's the odd case of the second image, a small section from a larger document (which was NEVER fully released to the public; only two images from it) which supposedly proves that Hamas was using human shields, the text here is skewed which matches the skew on the front page but not on the page it was printed on.
Anyone who is familiar with GIMP, Photoshop or any photo editor can easily showcase that this supposed "proof" is a hoax. You went off on an unrelated side-tangent about how the document was a PDF (the IDF claimed it was not a PDF but a physical document) to prove it wasn't a hoax, but instead only erected a strawman to attack instead of addressing legitimate counterpoints (like you've done for three months now)
And it further begs the question; this was a part of a larger document, so why not release the entire thing online instead of the cover and a small section of text?
But I know your response will do one of the following things:>Insist you know about photoeditors>Continue to insist that the document was a PDF despite not being one>Ignore 90% of what I wrote and continue to insist you're right>Produce a hypothetical "what if' situation that has no basis in reality and is just schizoid speculation
>When you plot to kill the youth of a nation by poisoning their water supply
Le "morally superior" moment
Well-poisoning. So bold of them to embrace such an age-old Jewish archetype.
Are you actually retarded, or just grasping at straws? The document has clearly been tampered with. Even the story of how they acquired it is fishy.
It's not the only time either...
It's been a celebrated practice in their "culture" since medieval times.
How a group that is less than 2% of the world's population can cause so much destruction is beyond me.
>>320133>And again, if this was a legitimate document that they found in a Hamas hideout produced on real paper (like they claim) the supposed text would bend over the curve here that's marked by discoloration, but it doesn't; and furthermore the text on this document does not skew at all despite the document being skewed itself on the front page. But then there's the odd case of the second image, a small section from a larger document (which was NEVER fully released to the public; only two images from it) which supposedly proves that Hamas was using human shields, the text here is skewed which matches the skew on the front page but not on the page it was printed on.
Perhaps a great many need to learn how scanners work.
>>320144>wall of greentext>doesn't refute the claims>"learn how scanners work"
What are you even trying to say?
I was right in my prediction here >>320133>Ignore 90% of what I wrote and continue to insist you're right
Oh and a reminder that the "father of Holocaust denialism" was a French POW who was interned at the Buchenwald and Mittelbau-Dora concentration camps, he publicly denied any of the claims that there was a mass extermination operation at either of the camps he was interned at and testified that most of the violence at the Buchenwald and Mittelbau-Dora camps were not the work of the SS but the Häftlingsführung that was dominated by Communist prisoners.
What do you mean? Discoloration would have been eliminated by doing a black-and-white scan rather than a color scan. Deskewing the text on a document will skew the document itself, since the software may be unable to separate the document from the text.
1. They didn't deskew the document
2. They didn't discolor the document
>>320149>making bold assumptions on them not performing standard practices when scanning a document
Cringe. It could be hard to read a skewed line of text and it could be time-consuming and possibly expensive to keep so many color scans.
Yawn, not reading.
Imagine believing that the IDF mysteriously found a Hamas guide promoting the use of human shields during a massive war that was supposedly just laying around a random Hamas hideout that they randomly found by pure luck and believing it with no critical thought, then sperging out and throwing a tantrum like a child when someone questions it.
"The Jews have no sense of proportion nor do they have any judgement on world affairs...The Jews, I find are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as Displaced Persons as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog." - Harry S. Truman 1947 Diary
If he believed that, why did he continue fighting a war his predecessor entered to save them? As the commander-in-chief of the US Military, he could have withdrawn American forces from Europe just as the war was about to end and let the Nazis at least retake what they could before they’re stopped by the British and French.