You have the poner ...
You have the pol ...
The real reason is because /mlpol/ has users (staff is also users) that care like you.
You can totally delete your own threads on 4chan.
You just can't delete them after they've been up for 2 minutes or before they've been up for 5 minutes.
That sounds like an asinine policy. Do 4chan's admins want to be the only ones allowed to delete threads or something?
halfchan has been perma banning anyone that doesnt mimic their ai shitpostbot r9k algo.
I got a 60 day ban over objecting to excessive barbie spam
I got a ban for posting this in December by one of gookmoot's tranny antifa mods when the boomers were still taking the bait in a "happening" thread that was leading up to the January 6th gayop
i got perma banned in 2017 then i came here. best ban of my life.
I was banned once for "muh racism"
I got banned for pedoposting in an /a/ loli thread
Also, that is the worst image I have seen. Only question is "does it make sense", not that well poison garbage
>>315335>well poison garbage
How are these questions poisonous?
How is asking "Cui bono?" or "Who benefits?" a poisonous question?
No questions are poisonous. Be skeptical of everything.
I'm the one that posted the image but this thread doesn't have IDs enabled.
I'm wondering what jon of iceland is going on about on poisonous questions or if it's just another bit of bait.
Qui bono is among the mother list of critical thinking. Refusing to allow this question is at the heart of authoritarianism. Full stop.
Also the heart of decadent complacency and consoomerism.
It's through failure to ask this question that society has collectively allowed Jews to continuously steal from us all.
Have a cute honest appul for your ho esty
It's superficial. Everyone gains from thinking dirt is nutritious, it's just not true. Nothing else matters except whether it makes sense
It's well poison because it's meant for people to go "this comes from a right wing source, so its wrong" or "this harms minorities, so its wrong". Even if a right winger applies it to lefties, it's just as wrong.
There is literally only ever one valid question to ask, "does it make sense?". Who asked it, who it benefits, whatever, whatever, doesn't factor in.
When it's just about empirical evidence being purported, you can put doubt into whether you want to trust them, since that's not actual thinking, it's just who do you want to have faith in. So, Dr. Shekelberg says something about a drug he was payed to research, you should doubt him. If some weirdo says "A and B means C is true", it's worth considering no matter who it is
You can't ask something like "did the holocaust happen?" because, "Nazis ask that too", and "it harms Jews", or "is this acceptable/unacceptable? No!", or basically any other question on that list
If people didn't consider these things, you could start asking about lack of prussian blue stains, or cremation maths, or why the story changed after they investigated the holding camps, or whether any of the testimonials make sense and why are such obviously false ones taken seriously, or any of a billion things, and people would actually have to think about them. This is obvious thinking based in facts which the mainstream mostly already accepts, but people dismiss it because of those sorts of "critical thinking" dismissal questions
I somewhat get it, Jon, but there's still a great many things that go well past "But muh keno optics" as playing by that game always leads to the kike winning as you handicap yourself.
And yes, the lack of prussian blue is a big one as are the wooden doors and the hastily constructed fabrications that seemed to date to around the time that the USSR had occupied those formerly held areas.
It still goes back to having "who benefits" as it begs to question why they'd push the lie of "pedal powered head crushing machines, machines that'd masturbate the jews to death, forcing the jews in the tree to act like birds at all hours of the day and night in scheduled shifts, making lampshades out of the jews, making bars of soap from the jews" among many other fabrications.
Who would benefit from lying about such things, especially during an emotionally charged time such as winning a war (for a nation state that didn't formally exist yet save for an agreement that got Britain to drag the USA into the war)?
for violating rule #1 (no cp)?
You can delete threads and posts on 4chan, you just have a 15 minute window to do so after posting.