/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
Note: JS is reccomended to be able to post effortlessly, but I am working on a system where that won't be needed.

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

12387843298744325.jpg
Mlpol is better than 4chan
Anonymous
No.314960
314966 314968 314970 315006
I can't delete my own thread on 4chan and here I can. Why?
Anonymous
No.314966
a7tg8a.png
>>314960
Pupper's magic.
Anonymous
No.314968
>>314960
the mods care here.
Anonymous
No.314970
319179
1686479__safe_rarity_coco+pommel_female_pony_mare_unicorn_earth+pony_open+mouth_edit_tongue+out_food_dialogue_sitting_cropped_speech+bubble_looking+a.png
scooby-doo-political-cartoon.png
>>314960
You have the poner ...
You have the pol ...
/mlpol/
The real reason is because /mlpol/ has users (staff is also users) that care like you.
Thank you.
Anonymous
No.314979
I hate 4chan and hiro
Anonymous
No.314982
314997
You can totally delete your own threads on 4chan.
You just can't delete them after they've been up for 2 minutes or before they've been up for 5 minutes.
Anonymous
No.314997
314998 315768
>>314982
That sounds like an asinine policy. Do 4chan's admins want to be the only ones allowed to delete threads or something?
Anonymous
No.314998
C94D5E7B-6A8C-4327-9C93-2F3B70F72549.jpeg
>>314997
Yes
Anonymous
No.315006
>>314960
Because I love you.
Anonymous
No.315054
315085
halfchan has been perma banning anyone that doesnt mimic their ai shitpostbot r9k algo.
Anonymous
No.315085
315088
>>315054
I got a 60 day ban over objecting to excessive barbie spam
Anonymous
No.315088
315091 315092 315313 315335
1502915810237-0.jpg
>>315085
I got a ban for posting this in December by one of gookmoot's tranny antifa mods when the boomers were still taking the bait in a "happening" thread that was leading up to the January 6th gayop
Anonymous
No.315091
315667
>>315088
i got perma banned in 2017 then i came here. best ban of my life.
Anonymous
No.315092
>>315088
Checked and saved.
Anonymous
No.315313
>>315088
I was banned once for "muh racism"
Anonymous
No.315335
315338 315348
>>315088
I got banned for pedoposting in an /a/ loli thread

Also, that is the worst image I have seen. Only question is "does it make sense", not that well poison garbage
Anonymous
No.315338
315628
>>315335
>well poison garbage
Elaborate.
How are these questions poisonous?
Anonymous
No.315348
315349 315628
100532.png
>>315335
How is asking "Cui bono?" or "Who benefits?" a poisonous question?
Anonymous
No.315349
315350
>>315348
It's not.
No questions are poisonous. Be skeptical of everything.
Anonymous
No.315350
315351
358150.jpeg
>>315349
I'm the one that posted the image but this thread doesn't have IDs enabled.
I'm wondering what jon of iceland is going on about on poisonous questions or if it's just another bit of bait.
Anonymous
No.315351
315352 315630
>>315350
Qui bono is among the mother list of critical thinking. Refusing to allow this question is at the heart of authoritarianism. Full stop.
Anonymous
No.315352
315353 315630
>>315351
Also the heart of decadent complacency and consoomerism.
It's through failure to ask this question that society has collectively allowed Jews to continuously steal from us all.
Anonymous
No.315353
filly_applejack_by_hakitocz-d6ni3hr.png
>>315352
Have a cute honest appul for your ho esty
Anonymous
No.315628
315632
>>315338
>>315348
It's superficial. Everyone gains from thinking dirt is nutritious, it's just not true. Nothing else matters except whether it makes sense

It's well poison because it's meant for people to go "this comes from a right wing source, so its wrong" or "this harms minorities, so its wrong". Even if a right winger applies it to lefties, it's just as wrong.

There is literally only ever one valid question to ask, "does it make sense?". Who asked it, who it benefits, whatever, whatever, doesn't factor in.

When it's just about empirical evidence being purported, you can put doubt into whether you want to trust them, since that's not actual thinking, it's just who do you want to have faith in. So, Dr. Shekelberg says something about a drug he was payed to research, you should doubt him. If some weirdo says "A and B means C is true", it's worth considering no matter who it is
Anonymous
No.315630
>>315352
>>315351
You can't ask something like "did the holocaust happen?" because, "Nazis ask that too", and "it harms Jews", or "is this acceptable/unacceptable? No!", or basically any other question on that list

If people didn't consider these things, you could start asking about lack of prussian blue stains, or cremation maths, or why the story changed after they investigated the holding camps, or whether any of the testimonials make sense and why are such obviously false ones taken seriously, or any of a billion things, and people would actually have to think about them. This is obvious thinking based in facts which the mainstream mostly already accepts, but people dismiss it because of those sorts of "critical thinking" dismissal questions
Anonymous
No.315632
401247.png
>>315628
I somewhat get it, Jon, but there's still a great many things that go well past "But muh keno optics" as playing by that game always leads to the kike winning as you handicap yourself.

And yes, the lack of prussian blue is a big one as are the wooden doors and the hastily constructed fabrications that seemed to date to around the time that the USSR had occupied those formerly held areas.

It still goes back to having "who benefits" as it begs to question why they'd push the lie of "pedal powered head crushing machines, machines that'd masturbate the jews to death, forcing the jews in the tree to act like birds at all hours of the day and night in scheduled shifts, making lampshades out of the jews, making bars of soap from the jews" among many other fabrications.

Who would benefit from lying about such things, especially during an emotionally charged time such as winning a war (for a nation state that didn't formally exist yet save for an agreement that got Britain to drag the USA into the war)?
Anonymous
No.315667
315772
>>315091
for violating rule #1 (no cp)?
Anonymous
No.315768
>>314997
You can delete threads and posts on 4chan, you just have a 15 minute window to do so after posting.
Anonymous
No.315772
>>315667
For trolling the Jannies
Anonymous
No.319179
Metabolic+donkey_8af0ab_8790617.jpg
>>314970