You already one of us. AntiMa is not an organization, it is an idea, anti-marxist. We share in the notion that communism in all its forms, past, present, and future are de-humanizing forces that have caused more deaths than any other ideology in the history of mankind, and will always do so. This is an empirical truth and to say otherwise would be to deny what you see all around you with your own non-internet eyes.
>using the language of your enemy
You're doomed to failure.
It looks like another bait bread.
isn't this how they curb stomped the right? you don't want to fight these people anymore?
are you jewish?
Trying to make our own antifa won't work because we legally won't get away with trying their tactics thanks to jews.
Do you know what will work?
Talking lemmings into realizing this failing system that fails to meet their needs and expectations for luxury will only get worse over time thanks to jews unless jews are stopped.
Checked but those dubs be wasted on you.
When you use the language of your enemy you give them the power to steer discourse.
the tactics of the enemy don't work for us because the enemy has their people in the institutions AND they practice Herbert Marcuse's Repressive Tolerance
What's that? Ordering us to tolerate everything they do to us while refusing to let us act or speak in our own defense?
i dont know why marx is so antagonized by the political right. he lead an ideology that ended up being just slightly shittier than capitalism. the mass murdering by communists wasnt even done under marx but by the followers of marx. marx was also anti-homosexual and wasnt fond of jews, blacks, and women. he had views on labor that were similar to Hitlers and many of the founding fathers. he just happened to be a kike loser who had no real life experience in labor but was well reserved in literature. those are all the ways i can think of defening marx. all that being said, he was a jew and his ideas gave birth to a new brand of mass subversion and chaos. I dont believe "marxism", "cultural-marxism" is the problem facing the west today. marx would be dissapointed is he were alive to see the political left today
Marxism requires an authoritarian government that sees NATURALLY-OCURRING ABILITY-BASED HEIRARCHIES as unnatural due to marxist beliefs.
Marxism wants to replace natural dominance heirarchies with unnatural ones where the commie liedeology dominates all.
This is incompatible with freedom, whether you think a nationalist government is necessary to protect the rights and freedoms of a nationalist populace or not.
Capitalism only sucks when jews ruin it by generating inflated dollars out of nowhere through debt, govt bullshit, and money-printing.
Whites deserve freedom more than anyone. Niggers don't want to be free, they want to be slaves who work for and fight for the highest payer (jews).
>>309010>he thinks 20th century communism is the problem and not western jewish bankers>>309011
the federal reserve is both a capitalist and communist entity. 2 sides of the same coin
>>309012>he thinks 20th century communism is the problem and not western jewish bankers>20th century communism
As original marxism failed to cause a worker upraising and the fall of the West, the jews switched to attack cultures as is the cohesive bond of nations.
Be traditional marxists stressing wealth distribution or the modern ones stressing social oppresion, the goal is the same ---> destruction of the Christian Western Civilization.>jewish bankers
I agree, but ranting against them is tiresome as they rest and hide behind a wall of loyal armed men.
>>309013>the original marxism failed
Yeah thats why the term marxist should be retired. why not just say "jewish" instead? Remember that big tech platform run by jews do not believe the people should seize the means of their company. they believe in total control of it themselves.
>>309015>Yeah thats why the term marxist should be retired
The new term is shaping into Masonry which embraces all angles of the jewry's nature.>Reinhard Heydrich: The Mason Hunterhttps://odysee.com/@TheFascifist:c/Reinhard-Heydrich-The-Mason-Hunter:1
Language evolves for better or for worse, "marxism" as a term has been appropriated by what we know as today's leftists, this is what marxism has come to mean, but this simply cannot be a harmful thing for us because we do not follow Marx's doctrine anyways, right, anon?
If anything, we probably should try to stop the leftist monopolization of the term "socialism".