/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
Note: JS is reccomended to be able to post effortlessly, but I am working on a system where that won't be needed.

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

pone.png
pic.PNG
NEW LEAKS
Anonymous
c223e6a
?
No.302128
302131
So this was found alongside some other pony merch on this site.

https://www.jfabrics.cz/en/product/950-my-little-pony-mlp119

>coming soon 09/2021
>Licence labelled my little pony
100 replies and 52 files omitted.
Anonymous
353124a
?
No.302384
>>302382
Maybe we should write the dirtiest fanfiction we can to show them the error of their ways, one thrust at a time. I doubt I'm the only one with that idea. Yeah, see here >>302363. That or the most grimdark. Basically just take whatever proposed "solution" to their "problem" they can come up with and take it to its logical conclusion. Could be fun.
Anonymous
7cc15b4
?
No.302386
>>302383
No one cares what degeneracy you are or were into. Stop blogposting
Anonymous
3a17f94
?
No.302388
>>302383
Take a hold of this guy! The time you take to write up a wall of text (mostly unrelated) to reply to a three-word-post is outrageous! Brilliant, just brilliant
Anonymous
e49937b
?
No.302390
302391
>>302382
>>302377
Their heads are too fucking wide.
Anonymous
3a17f94
?
No.302391
302392 302560
>>302382
>conspiracy theories
I hope they'll come up with something crazy that turns out to be actually real
>>302390
Not to mention, there is a lot wrong with these designs
Anonymous
458d8c8
?
No.302392
302560
>>302383
>Those bastards really love their "revolution of the young" lie, don't they?
Well, it's been leftism's winning strategy for the last 70 years. Brainwash the young and impressionable, turn them against the older and wiser members of society. Recruit as young as possible.
For everything else, just import foreigners and flip states that way.

>>302391
>I hope they'll come up with something crazy that turns out to be actually real
Mark my words, there will be a Trump-like villain behind it all. He was the one that stole all the world's magic with his racism powers and somehow convinced pony society to separate into different tribally homogenous cities because........ honestly I have no clue how they'll explain that one. It makes literally ZERO sense why ponies would do this, given everything we've seen in the show. It's like Star Trek Picard all over again.
Anonymous
e49937b
?
No.302401
302407 302411 302430
>>302370
>paid posters have descended onto all the mlp fan sites trying to defend this trash.
No lad, I'm afraid its much worse than that.
They're furries, flowing in from sites like twitter like a geyser of sewage. Thanks to fucking Imalou being a furry and responsible for the character designs they've been drawn to us. You can see in threads like this
https://boards.4channel.org/mlp/thread/36610255

That are just crawling with furfags. They've always been obnoxious creeps and have been responsible for pretty much every drama storm in the fucking fandom. From content creators like OMNIPONY being cancelled to people like MrDeLoop being groomed and leaving the fandom altogether. Hell I even had my own pony channel nuked by them using false DMCAs (and others as well as I've come to find out). I am so beyond sick of dealing with these faggots and now they're fucking with the source material and openly running roughshod over the fandom at large.
Anonymous
ec5a08e
?
No.302407
2rdH.asc.gif
>>302401
>They're furries, flowing in from sites like twitter like a geyser of sewage
>furfags
Anonymous
26d005c
?
No.302411
302420
>>302401
Didn't a furry get the Ask Princess Molestia blog C+D'd?
Anonymous
e49937b
?
No.302420
>>302411
Probably, they do shit like that all the time.
Anonymous
fd4a497
?
No.302424
302439
>>302340
What you think means:
#1: (((good goyim I think like a judeo-capitalist cuckshill!))) becuz I leik muh furfag hoof degeneracy 'cuz muh brain r 2 stoopid to reelize "Imaiou" r a cuckstain furfag!"
#2: (((I have never horfed down the kike schpiel so hard or so fast than before which makes me a cuck))))
#3: "HURRDURRDURRDURRDURR MUH 'PINYUN R BETTUR DEN YURZ" is evidence against you, the braindead cuckshill that you OBVIOUSLY are, is defending that LITERAL FURFAG TRAITOR.
#4: you are a britmutt, end of story. Shut the fuck up, glownigger wannabe shill.
Anonymous
84df7e6
?
No.302430
>>302401
The board should have been /fim/.
Anonymous
26d005c
?
No.302439
302440 302441
>>302424
Why do you talk like this and throw untrue accusations around every time you're even slightly upset?
Clean your glasses if you wear them. Someone said furry hooves are for furries only. Stop trying to derail this topic. What do you have against furry hooves as a concept?
Anonymous
e49937b
?
No.302440
302441 302462
>>302439
Well technically the thing you're referring to as "furry hooves" is called shorn fetlocks.
And secondly the reason for his hostility is due to gatekeeping. I mean I used to not really support such things but seeing as furries are becoming a bigger problem to this fandom I can't really blame him.
Anonymous
fd4a497
?
No.302441
302443 302447
>>302439
You are an ACTUAL RETARD. You did not even do the BASIC RESEARCH NECESSARY to LEARN that the """artist""" is a WELL KNOWN FURFAG with WELL KNOWN PRO-PEDOPHILIA VIEWS. Is that derailing, you pathetic britcuck? No, that is 100% ON TOPIC. I do not have a problem with, as the honest, reasonable Anon has stated, is shorn fetlocks in a large amount of MLP artwork. What I DO have a problem with is when FURFAG PEDOPHILES insert THEIR OWN FETISH into an established work. Can you be ANY MORE STUPID? Oh wait, don't answer that.

>>302440
Thank you. I'd rather be a gatekeeper than move goalposts any day.
Anonymous
26d005c
?
No.302443
302445
>>302441
Why do you believe it necessary to do research on the creator of a piece of art before I am allowed to question someone on their view of a visual design trope like furry fetlocks used in the art?
You aren't gatekeeping. You're barking at windmills because they might be furries.
Anonymous
fd4a497
?
No.302445
302446 302456
>>302443
>y do u
Stop typing, your opinion is invalid since it's shit. Do you ever stop gaslighting or take responsibility for your own stupidity? Right now you are being /that guy/ incarnate.
Anonymous
26d005c
?
No.302446
>>302445
Quote my original post
Anonymous
7a52dc9
?
No.302447
302496
>>302441
>WELL KNOWN PRO-PEDOPHILIA VIEWS
>PEDOPHILES
Oh hi The-Possum-Face aka Gamble, have you considered that you have to go back?
Anonymous
7cc15b4
?
No.302456
302457
>>302445
>do you ever stop gaslighting
No, he doesnt
Anonymous
26d005c
?
No.302457
302459
>>302456
I repeat, quote my original post. Tell me what caused the confusion that made one clown cry "babyfur!".
Anonymous
7cc15b4
?
No.302459
302465
>>302457
On the condition that you stop posting, sure
>>302219
Anonymous
cfe6b3f
?
No.302462
302465
553.jpg
>>302440
>Well technically the thing you're referring to as "furry hooves" is called shorn fetlocks.
To be even more pedantic, we're talking about unshorn fetlocks.
Anonymous
26d005c
?
No.302465
302466
>>302462
Unshorn fetlocks? Neat. I like it when OCs have those, it makes their hooves look less like blocky rounded rectangles and more like furred horse legs. Besides, some real horses have really fluffy hooves.
>>302459
Do you think it makes sense to blame me for the nigger moment some kid had when he heard me say "i like fluffy hooves" and incorectly assumed I'm morally defending a pedophile? Just by saying something he doesn't like about fluffy-wuffy my little pony OC hoofsy woofsies? Of course not. You know how absurd this conversation is... right?
The facts prove I'm right. Are you afraid that if you or the other guy admits I did nothing wrong I'll lord this over you two forever? Don't worry, I'm not the kind of guy to give a shit about those social games. You know what they say about making assumptions, right? You make an ASS out of U-rself while ME laughs at you.
Anonymous
7cc15b4
?
No.302466
302505
>>302465
>I like it when mares have unambiguously male features
Which seamlessly fits with your futa fascination. Let's recap for the audience shall we?
>anon points out that unshorn fetlocks are a male horse trait, and suggests it's a furry indicator
>Nigel says he likes unshorn fetlocks on mares (but hes totally not gay)
>another poster sources the artist who - to no one's surprise - is an unabashed furry
For those thick participants yes Nigel, that's you this is the point where the goalposts started moving.
>Nigel attempts to assert that liking unshorn fetlocks is perfectly fine, in spite of the implicit assertion that they are gender-bending in an art style that is observably furry centric, from a designer who is observably and conclusively a furfag; this, while acting oblivious to how the deviant's furfag proclivities are in any way related to the character design, which includes unshorn fetlocks which Nigel likes (but totally isnt gay)
>posters give flak for his unsupportable positions
>Nigel gaslights both what he said and what posters said, rhetorically objecting to inferences that were not asserted and ignoring those that were
>posters tell Nigel to stfu referencing his own posts and statements
>Nigel attempts to 'morally' grandstand
This all began because you decided to insert - and then try to argue - your subjective opinion while other posters were arguing observable facts and observations of the content. We're not talking about observations leading to personal positions of 'like'/dont like', but observations of style, color, and form that lead to a greater awareness of the situation. 'I like a thing's is neither an observation nor does it advance the topic. What you like is irrelevant.
This started because you - like you always fucking do - decided to try and make this about your opinions and perceptions, and wouldnt let the matter rest when your opinions were rejected with cause.
>Nigel reiterates 'I like a thing' even though it's already been indicated that his reception of gender-bending shit on mares is irrelevant; resorts to a tired cliche that allows him to feel as though he's won, even though the cliche doesnt even apply to this context
>it makes sense to blame me
Yes. Dont make me get the hammer. Just stop
Anonymous
258cba7
?
No.302469
302598
size.png
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=1LM6xnMRJ-8
Anonymous
7cc15b4
?
No.302471
>>302470
>this could have all been avoided if I BOTHERED TO READ THE FUCKING THREAD
Noted, now stfu and quit derailing this thread with yet more of your self-centered bullshit
Anonymous
258cba7
?
No.302472
92e1e6f072fbdce199f440377ab376df972de86eee109344a7f211cbecbd71a3.png

Anonymous
cfe6b3f
?
No.302490
302496 302498 302600
1883471.png
Given the backstory of this new series appears to be that all the magic in Equestria disappeared, I wonder if they'd be brave enough to bring Cozy Glow back as the villain behind it all. Also, if all the magic is gone does that mean unicorns are unable to do spells and pegasi are flightless? Wouldn't that lead to a massive famine as a result of not being able to manipulate the weather and Earth ponies not having their growth magic anymore? Even during the ancient era when the pony tribes lived separately, the pegasi still controlled the weather and helped the Earthen grow crops. Everybody should have fucking starved to death after losing their magic.
For that matter, what about Cloudsdale? Wouldn't all the pegasi just fall to the ground and splatter if they lost their magic? Who is maintaining the sun and moon?
Of course I know the answer to these questions. The writers don't care, they just want to tell a story about how racism is evil.
Anonymous
fd4a497
?
No.302496
>>302447
No idea what/who that is. That one of Niggel's assclown 'friends'?

>>302490
None of that would be a fucking surprise given the direction hawjew took in hiring multiple furfags onto their "creative design/development" staff.
Anonymous
07439ad
?
No.302498
>>302490
>not being able to manipulate the weather
From what I've gathered in the later seasons, when pegasi aren't manipulating the weather, weather still happens.
Earth ponies are implied to use magic for growing, but the show never really explored/elaborated exactly how they do that.
Anonymous
ec5a08e
?
No.302499
302500 302506 302512 302527
01.jpg
02.jpg
04.jpg
05.jpg
06.jpg
https://cartoonimages.club/my-little-pony-5-generation-first-characters-posters-sunny-izzy-and-hitch/
I don't like them.
Anonymous
07439ad
?
No.302500
302507
>>302499
Izzy is kind of cute, tbh.
The rest can go fuck themselves, especially Hitch with his cursed dreamworks face.
Anonymous
6388ced
?
No.302505
302512 302518
>>302466
Do you expect us to ignore that you're god-modding and deleting posts that you don't like? The britfag didn't do anything more autistic than the people he was talking to. You shouldn't bring up people's post histories, even if they are being fags.

>unambiguously male features
>anon points out that unshorn fetlocks are a male horse trait
>the implicit assertion that [unshorn fetlocks/feathers] are gender-bending
I think you've conflated "unshorn fetlocks" with feathers (the term for horse hair that grows long over the hooves, which Clydesdales have). I hope you're not talking about real horses, because feathers are a trait shared by many breeds of horse that live in cold climates. These horses tend to be larger and more muscular than other breeds of horse, but there's nothing to suggest that only male horses have feathers - the females are exposed to the cold just as much as the males.

If you're talking about the design trend in FiM where only male horses that use Big Mac's animation model have "feathers," then I suppose that makes a bit more sense. It's been a while since I paid enough attention to a pony's design to notice something like that, so I personally wouldn't take it as an indication of masculinity or femininity. Furthermore, the new characters are 3D and in a new art style, so I think it's a bit unfair to say that a design trend from G4 would apply to them. I personally don't think we know enough about the G5 setting and lore/fluff to make judgements about its art direction yet: all we've seen are three of the main characters and one background.

>but the creator is a furry!
I know that, and I do agree that the creator's being a furry does indicate faggotry. You won't find me defending furries or defending overly cutesy sparkledog vomit like Imalou's art. However, based on my searching in on Twitter and DA, the earlier claims that the artist is a diaperfur with pro-pedo views do not seem to be substantiated. Pardon me for being out of the loop, but if there's something deeper that I don't know about then I'd like to be informed.
Anonymous
6388ced
?
No.302506
302507
>>302499
They remind me of low-budget 3D television cartoons. The designs are clean to the point of being bland.
Anonymous
d208624
?
No.302507
>>302500
Pretty much this.

>>302506
>They remind me of low-budget 3D television cartoons.
That's basically what this is as far as I can tell. My current working theory is that Hasbro is circling the drain and just doesn't care anymore. That's the only reason I can think of for these designs being approved.
Anonymous
d208624
?
No.302508
1614366785491.png
La Creatura...
Anonymous
fd4a497
?
No.302512
302516
>>302499
Part of the reason behind the mostly mutual dislike is the blanderizing of equine physical features. There are no real distinctions between the models besides color and some 'eminently objective artistic decor', which makes them indistinct and thus untrustworthy. IE: the artist(s) don't realize that by copy-pasting the same body style over and over with nothing more than minor changes, their 'works' are inherently self-plagiarized spam. A slightly smaller issue is the grandstanding of using coloration differences & gradients that would APPEAR to create 'character differences', but don't add anything positive to each 'character'. This is basic fucking art 101.

>>302505
And here comes the leafbrit defending his fellow shabbos goy like the supercuck he is! Come back with some evidence to back up your premature projected assertions next time. And, oh, stop gaslighting everything like Niggel (((just becuz i leik wut uh leik))). It'll make your attempt at points valid for once.
Anonymous
40fc135
?
No.302516
302517 302523
>>302512
>gaslighting
You don't know what that word means and the fact you're using it is proof you're a normalfag. Disagreeing with you is not "gaslighting."
>Come back with some evidence
I'm not the one claiming the artist is a diaperfag and a pedo. I looked at "her" profiles on DA and Twitter and searched for some common words (diaper, pedo, furry) and found nothing incriminating. If you know something I don't, then by all means post it.

>premature projected assertions
>It'll make your attempt at points valid for once.
Please stop typing like an autistic teenager.
Anonymous
40fc135
?
No.302517
302523
>>302516
*(diaper, pedo, furry, etc.)
Just so you don't go thinking that I only searched for literally those three words.
Anonymous
7cc15b4
?
No.302518
>>302505
You'll figure it out, I believe in you
Anonymous
fd4a497
?
No.302523
1377902625053.jpg
>>302516
okay boomer.
>>302517
okay boomer.
Anonymous
905ab3c
?
No.302525
302527
File (hide): 78162F7823594D76220975B1EA0E3D07-1560656.webm (1.5 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:13, gee-fivers.webm) [play once] [loop]
gee-fivers.webm
imagine falling for the gee-five
Anonymous
458d8c8
?
No.302527
302528
2559940.png
>>302499
>Sunny
From the plot synopsis and info we've seen so far, Sunny appears to be the main character for this new gen. She's the pony that kicks off the plot and brings the others together.
Obviously we'll have to see more footage to come to a definitive conclusion, but so far her character design looks incredibly generic without any of the charm or distinctiveness that Twilight Sparkle had. In fact now that I think about it... she's an Earth pony, she's the new series protagonist, her role is to bring everyone together, her room is full of books and she's even seen reading one in the screenshot with the pegasi. She's literally Earth pony Twilight.

>Hitch
Gay furfag bait 100%.

>Izzy
I'll be honest, I kinda like Izzy so far. Her design is good and I like the idea of an excitable unicorn. Obviously a lot will depend on the dialogue and writing but at least she's visually appealing.

>>302382
One more thing I noticed when looking at this image again. It seems that the pegasi have an art deco aesthetic going on, and I dig it. I wonder if they will do anything interesting for the unicorn and Earth ponies.

>>302525
Get ready for a wave of furries and fandom locusts from Twitter to hop on the G5 bandwagon and fight to edge out what remains of the old FIM crowd. We're going to see repeats of the Derpibooru Aryanne fiasco as new blood tries to cancel edgy memes from the fandom's history.
Anonymous
40fc135
?
No.302528
>>302527
There's something about Sunny's colour palette that bothers me, which is odd because I don't think there's anything really wrong with it. Orange and magenta and white should combine decently, but it just seems like it doesn't work.
>I kinda like Izzy so far
In the abstract her character could have potential, but I don't have confidence in Hasbro or anyone associated to write "wacky" characters without making them grating idiots. Her design has a decent colour palette, but that's all I can say about it. As one anon mentioned much earlier, it really irks me that her horn is a different colour from her body.
>art deco pegasi
I didn't notice that at first. It could potentially be interesting, but the way it's presented there just feels very flat and plain. It really seems like the 3D budget was limited for this series and the animators are getting away with as little as they can.
Anonymous
3f897b7
?
No.302534
At least we have ponerpics. It's safe from being raided by trannies and retards. It will preserve the legacy of greater times.
Anonymous
1e91016
?
No.302538
302543 302619
Do any of you actually have any hopes for this? Cuz if the synopsis is anything to go by, it'll be woke bullshit as far as the plot goes. Then there's the horrendous 3D animation style.
The worst part is that this might actually be a success for Hasbro too. Someone pulled stats from somewhere, and I don't know where the source was, but horsefuckers only account for about 5% of Hasbro's MLP toy sales.
Anonymous
3f897b7
?
No.302541
I hate g5 for so many reasons. There is no sugar coating it. It's a corporate scheme to push diversity. It features ponies designed so bad, they look like a bunch of wicked shits from dora the explorer. They look terrible even compared to generic oc's standarts. Despite being a show targeted at little children, as hasbro often claims, they push the agenda of inequity and prejudice based on racial bias, which is not something a kid is going to understand.

When september comes, I am going to buy some popcorn, sit down and watch this movie. Then film it and host on pirate bay just so Hasbro will loose a fraction of their profit. This is how much I hate g5. I will draw grotesque pornography that will make you vomit buckets, featuring scenes so vile and disgusting that it will break you. This is how much I hate g5. I will write fanfiction so horrifying, it will make you wish you were never born, neither those behind the making of every single scene, every single line, every single character introduced. This is how fucking much I hate g-mother-fucking-5.

fuck trannies. fuck shills. fuck Izzy, pipp and fucking sunny starscout.
Anonymous
cfe6b3f
?
No.302543
302569
>>302538
It goes without saying that Hasbro is not concerned one iota if this new show captures or expands the brony audience. As far as Hasbro is concerned, the adult fanbase has always been an afterthought at best, and a troublesome pest at worst. All the porn and adult memes were damaging the MLP brand and it wasn't worth whatever tiny amount of sales they received from the fandom.
The only thing that has surprised me so far about G5 is the fact that they're still keeping it (supposedly) in the FIM universe. I was expecting another revamp of the setting like previous generations. I would have much preferred it that way so I didn't have to witness them rape FIM's lore anymore, but here we are.
Anonymous
73633c9
?
No.302557
>>302373
In my humble opinion, it doesn't matter where the universe is actually set, they will rape the lore of the previous generation no matter what. How do I know this will be the case? Because every other G4 writer to get hired onto the project has done so to the previous group of writers. Where every time there was an established lore in the making, the next writer retconed it to then start writing their own canon. Every writer wanted control of the show. The whole thing about the Castle of the Two Sisters and their journal is just a fragment of all that were and then destroyed.

Even if the g5 universe is independent or the same, they will put the new world they create on a pedestal and take a dump on everything that was the previous generation. And they will do so because all these writers have huge Ego complexes.

How blunt or subtle they will go about it is any one's guess. But seeing how the CEO himself went from the Brand Blueprint of 2015 of "Interactive play and Storytelling", to "Inclusion and Diversity" you can see a sharp turn in how this new MLP show will turn out, especially with the press release of the main character being a "Political Activist". Added to the fact of the internal leaks where they wanted to cut Applejack because she was "Hick Shit" well. I have no faith that they would respect any of the g4's original conservative values, such as family, and friendship.