100 replies and 52 files omitted.
Maybe we should write the dirtiest fanfiction we can to show them the error of their ways, one thrust at a time. I doubt I'm the only one with that idea. Yeah, see here >>302363
. That or the most grimdark. Basically just take whatever proposed "solution" to their "problem" they can come up with and take it to its logical conclusion. Could be fun.
No one cares what degeneracy you are or were into. Stop blogposting
Take a hold of this guy! The time you take to write up a wall of text (mostly unrelated) to reply to a three-word-post is outrageous! Brilliant, just brilliant
Their heads are too fucking wide.
I hope they'll come up with something crazy that turns out to be actually real>>302390
Not to mention, there is a lot wrong with these designs
>>302383>Those bastards really love their "revolution of the young" lie, don't they?
Well, it's been leftism's winning strategy for the last 70 years. Brainwash the young and impressionable, turn them against the older and wiser members of society. Recruit as young as possible.
For everything else, just import foreigners and flip states that way. >>302391>I hope they'll come up with something crazy that turns out to be actually real
Mark my words, there will be a Trump-like villain behind it all. He was the one that stole all the world's magic with his racism powers and somehow convinced pony society to separate into different tribally homogenous cities because........ honestly I have no clue how they'll explain that one. It makes literally ZERO sense why ponies would do this, given everything we've seen in the show. It's like Star Trek Picard all over again.
>>302370>paid posters have descended onto all the mlp fan sites trying to defend this trash.
No lad, I'm afraid its much worse than that.
They're furries, flowing in from sites like twitter like a geyser of sewage. Thanks to fucking Imalou being a furry and responsible for the character designs they've been drawn to us. You can see in threads like thishttps://boards.4channel.org/mlp/thread/36610255
That are just crawling with furfags. They've always been obnoxious creeps and have been responsible for pretty much every drama storm in the fucking fandom. From content creators like OMNIPONY being cancelled to people like MrDeLoop being groomed and leaving the fandom altogether. Hell I even had my own pony channel nuked by them using false DMCAs (and others as well as I've come to find out). I am so beyond sick of dealing with these faggots and now they're fucking with the source material and openly running roughshod over the fandom at large.
Didn't a furry get the Ask Princess Molestia blog C+D'd?
Probably, they do shit like that all the time.
What you think means:
#1: (((good goyim I think like a judeo-capitalist cuckshill!))) becuz I leik muh furfag hoof degeneracy 'cuz muh brain r 2 stoopid to reelize "Imaiou" r a cuckstain furfag!"
#2: (((I have never horfed down the kike schpiel so hard or so fast than before which makes me a cuck))))
#3: "HURRDURRDURRDURRDURR MUH 'PINYUN R BETTUR DEN YURZ" is evidence against
you, the braindead cuckshill that you OBVIOUSLY are, is defending that LITERAL FURFAG TRAITOR.
#4: you are a britmutt, end of story. Shut the fuck up, glownigger wannabe shill.
The board should have been /fim/.
Why do you talk like this and throw untrue accusations around every time you're even slightly upset?
Clean your glasses if you wear them. Someone said furry hooves are for furries only. Stop trying to derail this topic. What do you have against furry hooves as a concept?
Well technically the thing you're referring to as "furry hooves" is called shorn fetlocks.
And secondly the reason for his hostility is due to gatekeeping. I mean I used to not really support such things but seeing as furries are becoming a bigger problem to this fandom I can't really blame him.
You are an ACTUAL RETARD.
You did not even do the BASIC RESEARCH NECESSARY
that the """artist""" is a WELL KNOWN FURFAG
with WELL KNOWN PRO-PEDOPHILIA VIEWS.
Is that derailing, you pathetic britcuck? No, that is 100% ON TOPIC.
I do not have a problem with, as the honest, reasonable Anon has stated, is shorn fetlocks in a large amount of MLP artwork. What I DO
have a problem with is when FURFAG PEDOPHILES
insert THEIR OWN FETISH into an established work. Can you be ANY MORE STUPID?
Oh wait, don't answer that.>>302440
Thank you. I'd rather be a gatekeeper than move goalposts any day.
Why do you believe it necessary to do research on the creator of a piece of art before I am allowed to question someone on their view of a visual design trope like furry fetlocks used in the art?
You aren't gatekeeping. You're barking at windmills because they might be furries.
>>302443>y do u
Stop typing, your opinion is invalid since it's shit. Do you ever stop gaslighting or take responsibility for your own stupidity? Right now you are being /that guy/
>>302441>WELL KNOWN PRO-PEDOPHILIA VIEWS>PEDOPHILES
Oh hi The-Possum-Face aka Gamble, have you considered that you have to go back?
I repeat, quote my original post. Tell me what caused the confusion that made one clown cry "babyfur!".
On the condition that you stop posting, sure>>302219
>>302440>Well technically the thing you're referring to as "furry hooves" is called shorn fetlocks.
To be even more pedantic, we're talking about unshorn fetlocks.
Unshorn fetlocks? Neat. I like it when OCs have those, it makes their hooves look less like blocky rounded rectangles and more like furred horse legs. Besides, some real horses have really fluffy hooves.>>302459
Do you think it makes sense to blame me for the nigger moment some kid had when he heard me say "i like fluffy hooves" and incorectly assumed I'm morally defending a pedophile? Just by saying something he doesn't like about fluffy-wuffy my little pony OC hoofsy woofsies? Of course not. You know how absurd this conversation is... right?
The facts prove I'm right. Are you afraid that if you or the other guy admits I did nothing wrong I'll lord this over you two forever? Don't worry, I'm not the kind of guy to give a shit about those social games. You know what they say about making assumptions, right? You make an ASS out of U-rself while ME laughs at you.
>>302465>I like it when mares have unambiguously male features
Which seamlessly fits with your futa fascination. Let's recap for the audience shall we?>anon points out that unshorn fetlocks are a male horse trait, and suggests it's a furry indicator>Nigel says he likes unshorn fetlocks on mares (but hes totally not gay)>another poster sources the artist who - to no one's surprise - is an unabashed furry
For those thick participants yes Nigel, that's you
this is the point where the goalposts started moving. >Nigel attempts to assert that liking unshorn fetlocks is perfectly fine, in spite of the implicit assertion that they are gender-bending in an art style that is observably furry centric, from a designer who is observably and conclusively a furfag; this, while acting oblivious to how the deviant's furfag proclivities are in any way related to the character design, which includes unshorn fetlocks which Nigel likes (but totally isnt gay)>posters give flak for his unsupportable positions>Nigel gaslights both what he said and what posters said, rhetorically objecting to inferences that were not asserted and ignoring those that were>posters tell Nigel to stfu referencing his own posts and statements>Nigel attempts to 'morally' grandstand
This all began because you decided to insert - and then try to argue - your subjective opinion while other posters were arguing observable facts and observations of the content. We're not talking about observations leading to personal positions of 'like'/dont like', but observations of style, color, and form that lead to a greater awareness of the situation. 'I like a thing's is neither an observation nor does it advance the topic. What you like is irrelevant.
This started because you - like you always fucking do
- decided to try and make this about your opinions and perceptions, and wouldnt let the matter rest when your opinions were rejected with cause.>Nigel reiterates 'I like a thing' even though it's already been indicated that his reception of gender-bending shit on mares is irrelevant; resorts to a tired cliche that allows him to feel as though he's won, even though the cliche doesnt even apply to this context>it makes sense to blame me
Yes. Dont make me get the hammer. Just stop
>this could have all been avoided if I BOTHERED TO READ THE FUCKING THREAD
Noted, now stfu and quit derailing this thread with yet more of your self-centered bullshit
Given the backstory of this new series appears to be that all the magic in Equestria disappeared, I wonder if they'd be brave enough to bring Cozy Glow back as the villain behind it all. Also, if all the magic is gone does that mean unicorns are unable to do spells and pegasi are flightless? Wouldn't that lead to a massive famine as a result of not being able to manipulate the weather and Earth ponies not having their growth magic anymore? Even during the ancient era when the pony tribes lived separately, the pegasi still controlled the weather and helped the Earthen grow crops. Everybody should have fucking starved to death after losing their magic.
For that matter, what about Cloudsdale? Wouldn't all the pegasi just fall to the ground and splatter if they lost their magic? Who is maintaining the sun and moon?
Of course I know the answer to these questions. The writers don't care, they just want to tell a story about how racism is evil.
No idea what/who that is. That one of Niggel's assclown 'friends'?>>302490
None of that would be a fucking surprise given the direction hawjew took in hiring multiple furfags onto their "creative design/development" staff.
>>302490>not being able to manipulate the weather
From what I've gathered in the later seasons, when pegasi aren't manipulating the weather, weather still happens.
Earth ponies are implied to use magic for growing, but the show never really explored/elaborated exactly how they do that.
Izzy is kind of cute, tbh.
The rest can go fuck themselves, especially Hitch with his cursed dreamworks face.
Do you expect us to ignore that you're god-modding and deleting posts that you don't like? The britfag didn't do anything more autistic than the people he was talking to. You shouldn't bring up people's post histories, even if they are being fags.>unambiguously male features>anon points out that unshorn fetlocks are a male horse trait>the implicit assertion that [unshorn fetlocks/feathers] are gender-bending
I think you've conflated "unshorn fetlocks" with feathers (the term for horse hair that grows long over the hooves, which Clydesdales have). I hope you're not talking about real horses, because feathers are a trait shared by many breeds of horse that live in cold climates. These horses tend to be larger and more muscular than other breeds of horse, but there's nothing to suggest that only male horses have feathers - the females are exposed to the cold just as much as the males.
If you're talking about the design trend in FiM where only male horses that use Big Mac's animation model have "feathers," then I suppose that makes a bit more sense. It's been a while since I paid enough attention to a pony's design to notice something like that, so I personally wouldn't take it as an indication of masculinity or femininity. Furthermore, the new characters are 3D and in a new art style, so I think it's a bit unfair to say that a design trend from G4 would apply to them. I personally don't think we know enough about the G5 setting and lore/fluff to make judgements about its art direction yet: all we've seen are three of the main characters and one background.>but the creator is a furry!
I know that, and I do agree that the creator's being a furry does indicate faggotry. You won't find me defending furries or defending overly cutesy sparkledog vomit like Imalou's art. However, based on my searching in on Twitter and DA, the earlier claims that the artist is a diaperfur with pro-pedo views do not seem to be substantiated. Pardon me for being out of the loop, but if there's something deeper that I don't know about then I'd like to be informed.
They remind me of low-budget 3D television cartoons. The designs are clean to the point of being bland.
Pretty much this.>>302506>They remind me of low-budget 3D television cartoons.
That's basically what this is as far as I can tell. My current working theory is that Hasbro is circling the drain and just doesn't care anymore. That's the only reason I can think of for these designs being approved.
Part of the reason behind the mostly
mutual dislike is the blanderizing of equine physical features. There are no real distinctions between the models besides
color and some 'eminently objective artistic decor', which makes them indistinct and thus untrustworthy. IE: the artist(s) don't realize that by copy-pasting the same body style over and over with nothing more than minor changes, their 'works' are inherently self-plagiarized spam. A slightly smaller issue is the grandstanding of using coloration differences & gradients that would APPEAR
to create 'character differences', but don't add anything positive to each 'character'. This is basic fucking art 101.>>302505
And here comes the leafbrit defending his fellow shabbos goy like the supercuck he is! Come back with some evidence to back up your premature projected assertions next time. And, oh, stop gaslighting everything like Niggel (((just becuz i leik wut uh leik))). It'll make your attempt at points valid for once.
You don't know what that word means and the fact you're using it is proof you're a normalfag. Disagreeing with you is not "gaslighting.">Come back with some evidence
I'm not the one claiming the artist is a diaperfag and a pedo. I looked at "her" profiles on DA and Twitter and searched for some common words (diaper, pedo, furry) and found nothing incriminating. If you know something I don't, then by all means post it.>premature projected assertions>It'll make your attempt at points valid for once.
Please stop typing like an autistic teenager.
*(diaper, pedo, furry, etc.)
Just so you don't go thinking that I only searched for literally those three words.
You'll figure it out, I believe in you
imagine falling for the gee-five
From the plot synopsis and info we've seen so far, Sunny appears to be the main character for this new gen. She's the pony that kicks off the plot and brings the others together.
Obviously we'll have to see more footage to come to a definitive conclusion, but so far her character design looks incredibly generic without any of the charm or distinctiveness that Twilight Sparkle had. In fact now that I think about it... she's an Earth pony, she's the new series protagonist, her role is to bring everyone together, her room is full of books and she's even seen reading one in the screenshot with the pegasi. She's literally Earth pony Twilight. >Hitch
Gay furfag bait 100%. >Izzy
I'll be honest, I kinda like Izzy so far. Her design is good and I like the idea of an excitable unicorn. Obviously a lot will depend on the dialogue and writing but at least she's visually appealing. >>302382
One more thing I noticed when looking at this image again. It seems that the pegasi have an art deco aesthetic going on, and I dig it. I wonder if they will do anything interesting for the unicorn and Earth ponies. >>302525
Get ready for a wave of furries and fandom locusts from Twitter to hop on the G5 bandwagon and fight to edge out what remains of the old FIM crowd. We're going to see repeats of the Derpibooru Aryanne fiasco as new blood tries to cancel edgy memes from the fandom's history.
There's something about Sunny's colour palette that bothers me, which is odd because I don't think there's anything really wrong with it. Orange and magenta and white should combine decently, but it just seems like it doesn't work.>I kinda like Izzy so far
In the abstract her character could have potential, but I don't have confidence in Hasbro or anyone associated to write "wacky" characters without making them grating idiots. Her design has a decent colour palette, but that's all I can say about it. As one anon mentioned much earlier, it really irks me that her horn is a different colour from her body.>art deco pegasi
I didn't notice that at first. It could potentially be interesting, but the way it's presented there just feels very flat and plain. It really seems like the 3D budget was limited for this series and the animators are getting away with as little as they can.
At least we have ponerpics. It's safe from being raided by trannies and retards. It will preserve the legacy of greater times.
Do any of you actually have any hopes for this? Cuz if the synopsis is anything to go by, it'll be woke bullshit as far as the plot goes. Then there's the horrendous 3D animation style.
The worst part is that this might actually be a success for Hasbro too. Someone pulled stats from somewhere, and I don't know where the source was, but horsefuckers only account for about 5% of Hasbro's MLP toy sales.
I hate g5 for so many reasons. There is no sugar coating it. It's a corporate scheme to push diversity. It features ponies designed so bad, they look like a bunch of wicked shits from dora the explorer. They look terrible even compared to generic oc's standarts. Despite being a show targeted at little children, as hasbro often claims, they push the agenda of inequity and prejudice based on racial bias, which is not something a kid is going to understand.
When september comes, I am going to buy some popcorn, sit down and watch this movie. Then film it and host on pirate bay just so Hasbro will loose a fraction of their profit. This is how much I hate g5. I will draw grotesque pornography that will make you vomit buckets, featuring scenes so vile and disgusting that it will break you. This is how much I hate g5. I will write fanfiction so horrifying, it will make you wish you were never born, neither those behind the making of every single scene, every single line, every single character introduced. This is how fucking much I hate g-mother-fucking-5.
fuck trannies. fuck shills. fuck Izzy, pipp and fucking sunny starscout.
It goes without saying that Hasbro is not concerned one iota if this new show captures or expands the brony audience. As far as Hasbro is concerned, the adult fanbase has always been an afterthought at best, and a troublesome pest at worst. All the porn and adult memes were damaging the MLP brand and it wasn't worth whatever tiny amount of sales they received from the fandom.
The only thing that has surprised me so far about G5 is the fact that they're still keeping it (supposedly) in the FIM universe. I was expecting another revamp of the setting like previous generations. I would have much preferred it that way so I didn't have to witness them rape FIM's lore anymore, but here we are.
In my humble opinion, it doesn't matter where the universe is actually set, they will rape the lore of the previous generation no matter what. How do I know this will be the case? Because every other G4 writer to get hired onto the project has done so to the previous group of writers. Where every time there was an established lore in the making, the next writer retconed it to then start writing their own canon. Every writer wanted control of the show. The whole thing about the Castle of the Two Sisters and their journal is just a fragment of all that were and then destroyed.
Even if the g5 universe is independent or the same, they will put the new world they create on a pedestal and take a dump on everything that was the previous generation. And they will do so because all these writers have huge Ego complexes.
How blunt or subtle they will go about it is any one's guess. But seeing how the CEO himself went from the Brand Blueprint of 2015 of "Interactive play and Storytelling", to "Inclusion and Diversity" you can see a sharp turn in how this new MLP show will turn out, especially with the press release of the main character being a "Political Activist". Added to the fact of the internal leaks where they wanted to cut Applejack because she was "Hick Shit" well. I have no faith that they would respect any of the g4's original conservative values, such as family, and friendship.