I often see hormone replacement therapy and sex change surgeries compared to the lobotomies of the mid 20th century and there are certainly many similarities. Both procedures are extreme and result and in major psychological and physiological damage, but there are some key differences which I feel need to be discussed. First is the scale, since it's inception only about 40000-50000 lobotomies were ever preformed in the United States there have already been tens of thousands of people who have taken these hormones in the U.S. alone. Second is accessibility even back in the day it was difficult to get a lobotomy from anyone other than a doctor, but today there are plenty of grey market websites where people can buy hormones without a prescription. Third is the intent; the lobotomy was supposed to make mentally ill people functional HRT and "gender affirmation surgery" are supposed to make people "feel comfortable in their own bodies" it isn't supposed to treat a disease as "being trans is not a mental illness." Fourth and most importantly is how they are both promoted. The lobotomy was (misguidedly) promoted as a cure all for mental illness, while transgenderism is a "lifestyle" and an "identity." The worst part about the trans identity is that it is considered safe in today's society. There is a reason the overwhelming majority of LGBTWTFBBQ freaks are white; it's because if they identify as a faggot then they are less likely to be targeted by the powers that be because they are "oppressed." Even worse is that trannies are protected and can be put in positions of authority.
This trans shit is a lot more dangerous than the lobotomy ever was. HRT and gender affirmation surgery are not meant to treat a disease, can be easily accessible, and they are marketed to vulnerable white children in search of an identity.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 788165117B88E165140349E85E29541B-61055.jpg (59.6 KB, 430x346, lobotomy icepick.jpg)
>>293276
How is it Darwinian? It is being presented as an option to young children that are afraid of being targeted for being white and it's not like parents can prevent them from going down that path because that would be a hate crime and you would lose your kids. This shit is being used to destroy whites that would otherwise be productive members of society. Look at how common that shit is in programming communities. It is taking quality genetics and destroying them while promoting the lowest quality genes. That's not Darwinism, that's bioleninism.
How is it Darwinian? It is being presented as an option to young children that are afraid of being targeted for being white and it's not like parents can prevent them from going down that path because that would be a hate crime and you would lose your kids. This shit is being used to destroy whites that would otherwise be productive members of society. Look at how common that shit is in programming communities. It is taking quality genetics and destroying them while promoting the lowest quality genes. That's not Darwinism, that's bioleninism.
>>293277
Its darwinian in that genetic viability often manifests psychologically well in advance of physiologically. One who is susceptible to weeding themselves out of the gene pool by way of transgenderism is probably not viable in the long run for other reasons that are not readily apparent outside intense and unrealistic levels of scrutiny.
The same goes for parents who participate in rendering theirs unto their children in such a manner.
Not all that glitters is gold
Its darwinian in that genetic viability often manifests psychologically well in advance of physiologically. One who is susceptible to weeding themselves out of the gene pool by way of transgenderism is probably not viable in the long run for other reasons that are not readily apparent outside intense and unrealistic levels of scrutiny.
The same goes for parents who participate in rendering theirs unto their children in such a manner.
Not all that glitters is gold
>>293288
Those children don't fall for it because they're "weak".
They fall for it because their parents and schoolteachers force them into it because they want to look "tolerant" and gain lefty social credit for having one less cishet white family member. Children will speak any language if it's all they hear growing up.
Children will believe any lie if it's all they hear growing up. Kids raised Christian will only grow up questioning this if their head's filled with non-christian questions and anti-christ shaming. The Jew and its collaborators prey upon vulnerable white children. Not the "weak" ones, the helpless ones. The ones that got betrayed at a vulnerable age before they could develop proper brains and become the good people they could have been if they were born in another generation.
Those children don't fall for it because they're "weak".
They fall for it because their parents and schoolteachers force them into it because they want to look "tolerant" and gain lefty social credit for having one less cishet white family member. Children will speak any language if it's all they hear growing up.
Children will believe any lie if it's all they hear growing up. Kids raised Christian will only grow up questioning this if their head's filled with non-christian questions and anti-christ shaming. The Jew and its collaborators prey upon vulnerable white children. Not the "weak" ones, the helpless ones. The ones that got betrayed at a vulnerable age before they could develop proper brains and become the good people they could have been if they were born in another generation.
>>293300
Yes, the parents being weak is the gist of paragraph 2. The children share the parent's DNA and susceptibility to transgenderism is a psychological malady. Ergo, the parents (who have already reproduced) are removing their children (and therefore their genes) from the gene pool.
My argument is that the children/genes were ruined long before the child became more or less physiologically mutilated.
Dont simp for trans kids anon. Let them stand as the example of why transgenderism is intolerable and unacceptable and allow it to inform you and yours in your own affairs.
>Did ya do it?
<No
>Then what are ya sorry fer?
- Mickey, Snatch 2000
Yes, the parents being weak is the gist of paragraph 2. The children share the parent's DNA and susceptibility to transgenderism is a psychological malady. Ergo, the parents (who have already reproduced) are removing their children (and therefore their genes) from the gene pool.
My argument is that the children/genes were ruined long before the child became more or less physiologically mutilated.
Dont simp for trans kids anon. Let them stand as the example of why transgenderism is intolerable and unacceptable and allow it to inform you and yours in your own affairs.
>Did ya do it?
<No
>Then what are ya sorry fer?
- Mickey, Snatch 2000
>>293308
Susceptibility to transgenderism is, in my view, largely a function of conformity to social pressures and incentives. In a society that promotes the health of its people, conformity is a healthy instinct. In an intelligent individual, a high degree of conformity is maladaptive, but among those closer to and below the mean it is a net benefit to a large, healthy society. In a system consisting of a large number of relatively independent communities and states rather than a nation, I would argue that conformity is less of a good, but building such a system is a task for after the Jewish problem is resolved.
If transgenders were only a few isolated cases which were rejected by the wider society, I would agree that the removal of all transgenders is a net benefit to the gene pool. However, (the illusion of) widespread acceptance of transgenderism implies a systemic issue. These people aren't committing genetic suicide, they are being killed by the systems that they are hard-wired to protect.
Susceptibility to transgenderism is, in my view, largely a function of conformity to social pressures and incentives. In a society that promotes the health of its people, conformity is a healthy instinct. In an intelligent individual, a high degree of conformity is maladaptive, but among those closer to and below the mean it is a net benefit to a large, healthy society. In a system consisting of a large number of relatively independent communities and states rather than a nation, I would argue that conformity is less of a good, but building such a system is a task for after the Jewish problem is resolved.
If transgenders were only a few isolated cases which were rejected by the wider society, I would agree that the removal of all transgenders is a net benefit to the gene pool. However, (the illusion of) widespread acceptance of transgenderism implies a systemic issue. These people aren't committing genetic suicide, they are being killed by the systems that they are hard-wired to protect.
>>293334
That's reasonable, but I still assert that a parent who's idea of conformity involves mutilating (ahem, circumcision) and sterilizing their child is evidence of a too-adaptive psychology that is better off neutered. This is the same sort of conformity that gave rise to the radical left in the first place, and lacks sufficient discernment to be able to differentiate between viable and batshit social trends.
That's reasonable, but I still assert that a parent who's idea of conformity involves mutilating (ahem, circumcision) and sterilizing their child is evidence of a too-adaptive psychology that is better off neutered. This is the same sort of conformity that gave rise to the radical left in the first place, and lacks sufficient discernment to be able to differentiate between viable and batshit social trends.
>>293335
look man, what you say sounds reasonable to me, on a factual basis. but I am pretty supsertitious even despite believing in evolution. When I see 666 I swerve. I don't even consider myself a christian, but I do believe that the resonance of these numbers is a pretty good memetic excuse to reassess your own personal behavior or that of others.
look man, what you say sounds reasonable to me, on a factual basis. but I am pretty supsertitious even despite believing in evolution. When I see 666 I swerve. I don't even consider myself a christian, but I do believe that the resonance of these numbers is a pretty good memetic excuse to reassess your own personal behavior or that of others.
9 replies | 1 files | 6 UUIDs | Archived