/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>291025
this is a thread for general furfag hatred, but also
for the discussion of how to counter and fight back against the corrupting influence of furfags in the fandom, aka many artists falling into the porn rabbithole, especially on derpibooru, and being groomed by derpi furfag admins and twitter porn circlejerks into becoming furries, and leaving the fandom to draw low effort furry garbage porn for commissions

many times over this circle has repeated, without any resistence from our side

Bump. Ancientfag from the 4, over here for the antifa mapping, but fuck furrie grooming fags.

>>291031
thank you, we need to stop those freaks

I PROPOSE A NEW PROJECT: STOP THE FURFAGS:
>MAKE A LIST OF ALL ARTISTS WHO ARE CURRENTLY BEING GROOMED BY FURRIES AND HAVE STARTED DRAWING ANTHRO (example: magnaluna)
>REACH OUT TO THEM, SUPPORT THEM, SHUN THEIR ANTHRO WORKS, BREAK THEM OUT OF THEIR ECHO CHAMBERS, AND EVENTUALLY FINANCIALLY SUPPORT THEM TO FIGHT THE FURBUX

>>291037
In the free market, it's in any artist's best economic interests to serve whoever offers him the most cash. The artist gets to decide where his limit of integrity is, and people can support him more or less if they like it.
But I don't think a "campaign to keep artfags in this fandom" is a good use of time. What, are we expected to run up to any artist being paid to draw furry porn and say "I'll pay you double to NOT draw whatever the furries want"? We don't have time for that. Not when there are bigger fish to fry. Destroy antifa and communism.

>>291043
I dont think you understand, I advocate for the mass murder of all furies not the free market

may I redirect you towards the ancap thread or >>>/trash/?

>>291025
>fuck anthro
nothing wrong with that. sage for low-effort thread.

>>291043
This
>>291060
If you cant handle a reasonable refutation to an idea without inviting anons to go elsewhere, perhaps its (you) who belongs in /trash/
>>291060
Based Finn

>>291079
but anthro isn't same as furry. furries are cancer and gay but anthro is pure love.

>>291083
"Anthro" comes from the Greek "ántras," meaning "man." So are you trying to say a non-furry man is pure love? Or what do you mean by that?

>>291026
Honestly, the fall to hardcore porn was inevitable, we always knew it was coming way back in 2010. It's not even unprecedented, you can just take a look at what happened to the likes of Sonic over the years for an easy comparison. There are others that have a similar trajectory, but nothing on the scale of what happened to MLP. You can't even be surprised that the drawfags went where the money was, everyone knows that furfags are fucking loaded and you'd be stupid not to put your skills to use for the cash.

It's a damn shame, but there was never any stopping it, and believe me, I've tried. I've seen more than one drawfag friend go down the slippery slope of drawing an anthro here or there to full blown furry ocs, and they simply couldn't be talked out of it. That's how they get you, degeneration by association if you're not vigilant.

>>291084
>>291090
>but anthro isn't same as furry.
but it really isn't, newfag. furry is 100% fur but anthro isn't. anthro literally refers to an animal character with strong human-like features or a human with light animal-like features. anthro includes stuff like cat girls and you are literally homosexual if you dont like cat girls.

>>291094
>Honestly, the fall to hardcore porn was inevitable
>It's a damn shame, but there was never any stopping it, and believe me, I've tried.
I see it as darwinism, I didnt become a coomer, and I dont care how many people did

>. I've seen more than one drawfag friend go down the slippery slope of drawing an anthro here or there to full blown furry ocs, and they simply couldn't be talked out of it.
we need to turn this into a concerted effort, try new things until we discover ways to save people that work and we get a positive outcome ratio

Nothing like a self-proclaimed moral authority to dictate to everyone

>>291099
heh,
not even denying that you don't like cat girls and that you're gay

>>291109
I didnt read your post past the sentence wher eyou said anthro wasnt furfag shit, it is, catgirls are fine, it stops being fine once you put dog faces on furry human bodies

>>291111
What makes cat ears less degenerate than cat faces? Getting aroused by the idea of toying with a catgirl's ears and tails to make her adorably flustered and horny means getting aroused by the idea of arousing nonhumans in nonhuman ways.
But if I posted photographs of women photoshopped to have horse pussies and horse buttholes, would that be degenerate or would it be glorious horse pussy in HD?

>>291135
>What makes cat ears less degenerate than cat faces?
cat ears are pretty unremarkable, they re not vastly aesthetically different from regular humans

but you HAVE to be a zoophile to like humans with cat faces, I mean its not JUST zoophilia, its a mix of zoophilia and uncanny valley, healthy minds just dont like even seing that shit

>>291135
>But if I posted photographs of women photoshopped to have horse pussies and horse buttholes, would that be degenerate or would it be glorious horse pussy in HD?
I think horse genitals look fucking weird as well I never claimed I liked that shit

>>291135
If that is so,
then is this considered furry?

>>291137
Now that's a good talk I would like to derail into. You know one when you see one.
>I think horse genitals look fucking weird.
Congrats then. Zoophilia is not one of your kinks. It's not mine either but I believe a great portion of people does want that kind of thing irl. I still remember that story where a furry guy raped two of his pups to death and thus he deserved a coverage by a youtuber mr metokur (back when he had a youtube channel.)

To me real life horse genitalia is nothing to admire. It's gross and higly deceptive. Yes, I said that. DECEPTIVE. We all know that real horse pussy is of a 2d g4 pony, it's clean and tastes like maple syrup.

>>291141
very obliviously not

>>291142
>It's not mine either but I believe a great portion of people does want that kind of thing irl. I still remember that story where a furry guy raped two of his pups to death and thus he deserved a coverage by a youtuber mr metokur (back when he had a youtube channel.)
yeah kiro the wolf

thats not unusual at all for the furfags, back in the days there were furfag forums with hundreds of posts about story of them raping their dogs and the dogs of other people, there probably still are but I dont browse furfag forums obliviously

>Congrats then.
I have no idea why its so popular it just looks weird
especially when artist draw it extremely like bloated/swolen

>>291135
What makes vore, scat, inflation tier of porn less degenerate than that? You are just at the tip of a big shitty iceberg, my friend.

All things considered, If cute cartoon ponies were real, I would've definitely been on top of one by now, making her very sweaty and happy, mind you.

I don't even need those gross women. Pfff! Like, who needs to breed anyway? Some father wannabies with responsibilities? and with that in mind, all pon that is "no hooves" is downright herecy and in the eyes of a fellow brony should cease to exist.

>>291145
>Pfff! Like, who needs to breed anyway?
I mean sadly everyone
I say sadly because women are a fucking chore, who cares about how they look, the issue is their behavior and personalities
its not that I dont know HOW to deal with women, its just that they suck

but yeah reproducing is literally the way life deals with imortality, you are one single living being that has been alive for several billion years, technically

>>291144
Why are you bringing those up? Catgirls are cute. Liking them is not a fetish, it's the ability to admire good cartoons/anime/photoshops.
>>291147
One day technology will replace women. Robowaifus will cook for men, clean the homes of men, and bear all the children they want in a perfected artificial womb without defects or stillbirths. It will no longer be necessary for men to pamper women into giving sex willingly.
In the meantime, why do women have rights? What has giving them rights done for society? It certainly hasn't made them better mothers.

>>291158
nothing wrong with catgirls, but anthro is scat/vore tier

>second part of the post
you're getting WAY off topic dude this is a thread about anthro and saving ponyfriend artists from turning into furfags

>>291160
You can't stop artists from deciding to sell their souls to porn-obsessed degenerates, or deciding to exclusively create porn to attract and please those degenerates.
Some people just lack integrity, and will go with whatever's easiest. We don't have the money needed to waste on paying pony artists not to make porn.
For this to work, you'd need a massive "No pony porn! Cute pics only!" group with more than a hundred fans, and perhaps even their own booru where NSFW isn't allowed. This massive group's money would then become what furfag artists want.
Anthro is not scat/vore tier, anthro is cute.

>>291166
>You can't stop artists from deciding to sell their souls to porn-obsessed degenerates
its our duty to try

>>291166
>posting furfag shit
OH FFS eat a bullet

ITS NOT EVEN FUCKING MLP RELATED ITS A FUCKING ANTHRO FURFAG RABBIT
fucking furfag telling his lies earlier than "oy vey poyim anthro isnt furfaggotry", yeah right, look at him now posting furfaggotry

drink bleach then set yourself on fire

>>291166
>anthro is (((cute)))
Found the clueless subverted idiot. Kill yourself before someone else does, traitor.

>>291166
the pic is furry though,, and not anthro

>>291176
stop being such a ADHD nigger

>>291178
>the pic is furry though,, and not anthro
anthro is furry and you know it damn well furfag
at least HE is honest about his real nature

>>291025
Based.

>>291143
>>291130
Congrats, you've passed the idiot test. With such confounding reasoning who can blame me for testing you.
That being said, Inklings are not human as they have the attributes of the animal they're based on. What say you to this?
Where is the line drawn? And out of curiosity, hypothetically speaking why put a limit on whom may be your lover humanoid or not, amusing you've got good taste?

I mean squids are pretty smart so if they evolved imagine how intelligent they'd be.

>>291181
I completely agree with your post and I respect what your picture is trying to say but anthro is so disgusting and unerving than I still feel physically sick seing the one on the right

its also a nice example, ponies look somehow far less like animals than anthro/any furfag related shit, despite the different bodyplan

>>291184
>Congrats, you've passed the idiot test.
are you talking to me or the furfag? you originally replied to him I kinda injected myself and answered your question even though it wasbt addressed at me

>>291193
You sir, und die brite. I'd like to compare your opposing views but perhaps it's redundant, if to you it's not furry then to him it would probably be likewise.

>>291204
but you said "your conounding reasoning" while replying to two people at once, are you saying my reasoning was confounding or his? if you re talking about me excuse me but how tf is my reasonement confounding?
furfaggotry=bad, cute ponies=good, anthro*anything=furfaggotry
proven by science.

>>291211
And you said:
"very obliviously not"
Yet the character has squid attributes.
does that make them degenerate heresy?

>>291223
>Yet the character has squid attributes.
it really doesnt, the tentacle thing might as well be hair, it doesnt look tha tmuch different, and the rest of the difference, the facial features could just be down to cartoonish stylization of a human

I bet that if something like this actually existed irl it would be extremely disturbing to look at and offputting, but as low poly stylized 3D models you can hardly tell the difference from just weird makeup hair and glasses

again, furfag shit is a very SPECIFIC sort bullshit with a very specific origin point, its extremely easy to tell what is an offshoot of furfaggotry and what is not

>>291225
>I bet that if something like this actually existed irl it would be extremely disturbing to look at and offputting
What? You don't find these characters cute?
>furfag shit is a very SPECIFIC sort bullshit with a very specific origin point, its extremely easy to tell what is an offshoot of furfaggotry and what is not
Oh, Ok. I guess to the untrained eye it's a bit more difficult. I though these principles were more general. Thanks for your help. (Apologies for the long wait time, I was looking for a pic.)

>>291235
I know someone whose kid sibling has a colossal crush on the orange inkling girl. They look about the same age but when I was his age I wanted Lola Bunny. This chick ain't no Lola Bunny.

>>291192
The effect you are experiencing is called Uncanny Valley. There is a biologically hard wired reason why anthro shit is disturbing to a functional human brain.

>>291295
There is only an uncanny valley effect when the art's bad. When drawn well, it's cute.

Seeing alot of "if I say it's ok, its ok" ITT

>>291299
There is not an iota that could ever be considered >>>cute<<< about anthro shit. You are fucked up, end of story.

>>291306
As though on cue

Here's a fact. Look at this pussy. Do you see its beauty? Do you see how smooth and hairless it appears to be? I doubt that the complexion on this image has any hair at all. People often mock hair deniers when they say they like ponies with bare skin but in reality we don't think about humping a furbag, now do we?

Why ponies go to spa in equestria, huh? Would it be possible for them to put cream on their faces if it was full of fur? Of course not. I believe that we like ponies with human skin and that separates us from dumbass fucking furries.

Forgot to attach the file. I'm dumb

>>291295
>The effect you are experiencing is called Uncanny Valley. There is a biologically hard wired reason why anthro shit is disturbing to a functional human brain.
yeah no I agree 100%, I literally said the same thing myself >>291136

>>291295
how come regular show accurate ponies don't cause the uncanney valley reaction?

>>291192
That's an allergy to shit art, anon.
>sidemouth
>crocodile snout
>far boob bigger than close boob
>zigzag spine

Does the picture you behold on the left provoke disgust in you?
>>291380
>>291382
You're honestly hilarious considering how 90% of furfag art is "humans with animal-colored skin and animal heads" and hioshiru's furball ponies are very popular. Also, horses don't have coat on their puss, it thins out on approach.

>>291423
>Does the picture you behold on the left provoke disgust in you
No, it does not. But it doesn't provoke lust either.
>horses don't have coat on their puss, it thins out on approach.
Sorry. Looking at real horse pussy was never my kink. I'm glad someone like you had to dig up the facts tho.

>>291417
Well, if you added real life textures on it, it would. It's just a simplified 2d doodle (That grown ass men really love to imagine fucking)

>>291380
You... are ACTUALLY retarded. This explains everything.

>>291409
Oof, didn't catch that sorry, was too busy clocking out.

>>291417
Examine any number of sapient alien species in art, games, movies, books, etc. and you'll find the same lack of Uncanny Valley. Why is this? Show accurate ponies were designed thank you Faust using the same method to produce an appeal to sapience [ignoring the 'fear of the unknown' problem most humans have] mixed with an appeal to civilization [they have similar foods, buildings, furniture, social dynamics, rationalization issues, etc. etc. etc.]. For sure, they ARE ponies, and by that I mean quadrapeds with hooves, manes, and tails which are technically similar to human world equines, YET they've evolved and developed into a number of intelligent, socially modern species equal to re: honestly better than humans at the current time. This is not a matter of perception, it is a matter of intellectual maturity: show ponies have traditional philia, which is what humans desire most even though said humans do not recognize it. This does not negate any chance of Uncanny Valley effect, it is entirely bypassed. Or, for the tl;dr version: any 'average human meets pony from Equestria' or vice versa situation hinges on both discovering that the other, while strange and having different cultural attitudes/norms, isn't some Lovecraftian >thing< that can NOT be understood. Pic related, I guess.

>>291555
I mean more about the basic shape, why arent ponies offputting on a basic guttural level, looking at them they SEEM normal and dont trigger uncanney valley tier reaction, which is surprising since they re a chimera of tons of different things

>>291294
I just recently stumbled upon Splatoon and read a little about its character to find out what's with the tentacles . I know not much of its lore. (It's odd how I'm just discovering it now when the game was released half a decade ago even though I probably did see it advertised but payed it no mind. It seem as though Splatoon as well as other things have a way of discovering you, when you're ready for them.)
>I know someone whose kid sibling has a colossal crush on the orange inkling girl
I not sure why the characters are alluring. If not for the tentacles & mask they would have completely bypassed my attention. I guess I'm infatuated by things foreign to me, I suppose that's normal for curious types then again...

>>291562
You answered your own question in situ: they are sapient, intelligent, conscious, social, reasoning, emotional beings that do not conform to the human shape, which again means they do not enter Uncanny Valley territory. The question you are asking is better stated like this: "why do the >human-like attributes< of G4 ponies not cause Uncanny Valley?" The overall design isn't some incomprehensible Eldritch horror from beyond. We can rationalize and empathize with an entirely different yet sapient, intelligent species that has characteristics and attributes that can be considered/rationalized as 'cute'.

>>291566
I dont mean why their sapience causes confusion, I mean why their weird boy looks normal and cute to humans

like for example why do kitten look cute to humans, because a lot of the anatomy and behavior/posture of g4 ponies comes from cats
I guess that what I am asking is why those things that look nothing like human appear normal and sensible to the human eye

>>291571
weird body*

>>291225
>I bet that if something like this actually existed irl it would be extremely disturbing to look at and offputting, but as low poly stylized 3D models you can hardly tell the difference from just weird makeup hair and glasses
Are you of the belief that a cartoon will look the same in real life with merely real life textures?
Don't forget the factor that cartoons are caricatures. Reality requires realistic anatomy, therefore I don't think inklings would be extremely off-putting nor homely for that matter.

Take a look at our Italian plumber over here.
I don't think it 100% accurate but close enough for this ensample.

>>291579
>Are you of the belief that a cartoon will look the same in real life with merely real life textures?
not necesarily, but the shapes still look normal and somehow familiar

I wonder what ponies would look like if depicted photorealistically, but with show accurate style and shape

>Take a look at our Italian plumber over here.
your pic is meh, mine is closer

do you have anything like that but with ponies? again not some zoophile who photoshoped a horse purple but I think you get what I m asking for

>>291584
>I wonder what ponies would look like if depicted photorealistically, but with show accurate style and shape
>your pic is meh, mine is closer
You say you're not of that belief, yet you are.
Did you read nothing past my question and second to last sentience!?
Read what I type.

>>291592
what?

>>291571
Hrm, you sort of answered your own question again. This goes straight into the human psychological implications/norms of xenophilia versus the older forms of xenophobia which tl;dr into: "lol that not human we kill it now becuz no other reason". This subject/topic is extremely complex and I'm about to perform a very poor job at explaining it in generalizations, but here goes:

The body style of G4 ponies is both 'normal' and 'cute' SINCE that design fits with our modern notions of accepting another form/style/function of maturity when dealing with a non-human yet appealing form: elegantly shaped... flanks, long neck lines, distinct facial structures, wide colorations (which is nearly the same as dressing better than anyone else in eyesight radius) between individuals of the same species, and more that can be equivocated as 'close enough to normal that those differences don't scare me'. G4 ponies have an appearance that expounds and expands on what is considered 'acceptable', at least to our own relative normalicies. Small amounts of the anatomical, behavioral, and posture in G4 ponies are barely consistent with a house cat, but we cannot look at that in such a manner. A show pony could not possibly sit like a human that ONE mare being the only known exclusion. The Uncanny Valley effect is broken since ponies have their own highly unique biological quirks to deal with, ones that humans also have to suffer yet in different methods. The appeal here is that they obviously aren't human but are close enough to be registered in the brain as non-threatening. tl;dr: there's enough similarities that the average horsefucker entirely overlooks the inbred "oh that's not a REAL HUMAN so I should be afraid of and kill it" cultural (((norm))).

>>291594
What they'll look like? Like monstrosities, that's what. Like photo realistic Mario over there.
Read my post again.

>>291595
so basically you think they are bellow the uncanney valley in terms of resemblance to humans? I somewhat agree but I dont think I would have issues thinking of ponies as people just like other humans if one stood in front of me

>>291596
>What they'll look like? Like monstrosities, that's what. Like photo realistic Mario over there.
maybe, how would you know? thats why I m asking for precisely that, photorealistic ponies in the correct shape, to see wether or not they do look like monstruosities as you think they would

the closest think I ever saw to ponies in a photorealistic style were figurines (maybe a 3D render?) with photorealistic fur and textures and they didnt look like monstruosities

I was gonna counter that post

>>291595
They're goddamn abstract caricatures, no need to be so wordy!
Our minds can distinguish between cartoons and reality. One enters the uncanny valley when the difference becomes harder to distinguish. Is it real, or is it imitation?
y'all are essentially zoophiles in denial, at least in your fantasizes.
Don't believe me? Then answer me this, do you want to have sex with this mare or which ever you prefer?

That's enough autism for me.

>>291601
Go ahead. Mist an R tis all.

>>291602
your posts are completely incoherent I dont even understand what you re trying to say anymore

from what I understand you were saying, that a photorealistic version of ponies would look weird, I am still waiting for you (or someone else) to find one to tell wether or not its the case

>>291602
>y'all are essentially zoophiles in denial,
you seem to be projecting a lot

>>291604
Oh yeah, sure, Projecting.
>>291145
>All things considered, If cute cartoon ponies were real, I would've definitely been on top of one by now, making her very sweaty and happy, mind you.
Please try to curb your autism, everything I say is based on evidence.

>>291602
>, do you want to have sex with this mare
absolutely not, this drawing for example falls completely into the uncanny valley from me

>>291603
>your posts are completely incoherent I dont even understand what you re trying to say anymore
Should I pardon you on account that you're French?
Yet factor, caricature, anatomy and, realistic are all from the french language. Why can't you understand!? It's clear, coherent, and concise, ask any American. Do you see now why I'm lashing out?
>from what I understand you were saying, that a photorealistic version of ponies would look weird
Not even close! I'll make this as simple as possible for you. Cartoons are caricatures for god's sake they're synonyms. You know, you could go to a cartoonist and he can draw you as a caricature, a cartoon, for the right price. If a character form Splatoon such as the one we talked about, remember? (Here's a picture of her if you don't.)
If the girl with the orange "hair" >>291225
"would be extremely disturbing to look at and offputting" if she existed in real life, then ponies from MLP who are far more stylized (caricatures) would also look extremely disturbing and off-putting. All I was proposing was that these two cartoon style characters we just compared would not be functional living being in the real word if they looked as they do on screen. If they were real they would need to have realistic body proportions, or shapes as you put it.
>>291583
Quote:
>Don't forget the factor that cartoons are caricatures. Reality requires realistic anatomy, therefore I don't think inklings would be extremely off-putting nor homely for that matter.

Essentially what I'm saying here after the word "therefore" is that the girl with the orange "hair" which is an Inkling would not be off-putting if she was real and that I bet she would look quite endearing if you can get past the tentacles, I for one find them quite exotic. What say you in response the this?

The more stylized a character is the harder it would be to recognize them in real life, take Mario for example.

I'm basing my reasoning on science and how these character would look based on scientific possibility.
>>291607
Oh come on! I worked hard to find that art, and that's just half of my question! Do you take me for a fool!?

I've spared you quite the berating, I hope you can appreciate that.

>>291599
I don't believe anything. My answer for this is: ponies are not below the Uncanny Valley effect, they are beyond it. That is the important difference here: when you can consider another species as EQUAL to or above your own, that is where the Uncanny Valley effect is replaced by what is called philia. Ponies are cute AND adorable, which are two empirical situations that humans... consistently fail to be. You find a "good woman" and immediately the cunt is either into hypergamy, a literal whore for her religion (the so-called "sparrow" in communism/socialism/judeo-catholicisim, or the 'useful nasa' )deceiver in jewspeak known as 'the good charlatan' in mormon terminology), whereas equines remain loyal to the herd in entirety. This fact is intensely disturbing since modern hu-wymynz are incapable of understanding or recognizing loyalty.

>>291602
Okay cuck, since you can't read nor understand: have fun with your SIMPlistic fetishes when the rope is thrown for (((You))). Your questions are loaded and your red herring is rotten, biased degenerate shit. Poor try, shill, no 0.07 shekels for you this night.

>>291637
I apologize for taking out my frustrations on you, but there's no need for name calling, what are we five?
>your questions are loaded
Like a gut that's loaded that's kind of the point.
Hey it's alright, like a psychologist I remain impartial.
>have fun with your SIMPlistic fetishes when the rope is thrown for (((You)))
I know right, drat that OCD that plagues me.
>your red herring is rotten, biased degenerate shit.
Am I wrong untermenchen? Prove me wrong like a man does, sissy.

>>291650
Ahhhhhh yes, that lovely momarent when the (((gatekeeping goyim slave))) cries out in pain when he's called out for being a cardboard cut and paste shill. Okay cuck, since you TRIED to keep up, we'll start with this: since you can neither reason nor understand the hegemonic kike-owned processes behind your badbrainthought crimethink wrongthink slavery:
#1: you are the basic simp. "How", you ask, "am I the basic simp in this ultra specific instance that I can't habeeb because i haven't been told about it?" See:
#2: simping for the same (((media driven narrative that tells you to be a good goy))) despite your (((well intentioned protests))) leads to:
#3: shut the fuck up and swallow down that anti-anti kike pill like (((the good goyim))) you are, and you swallow it you mean it because doing anything else makes you a REAL GOY, which isn't like the real goys! You can't say anything against the (((psychologist))) since he's been kiked long after the Weimar Republic's decline, which falls into:
#4: proving you wrong for being the huejewhuejew furfaggot you are is as simple as taking a mere glance at the horrendous anthro pigshit you posted while CLAIMING it to be (((art))) is not only degenerate, it is subversive kike pigshit muttery. How exactly DO you feel, you huwhite traitor, in knowing that you are nothing more than the pawn of a pawn of a pawn that answers to a pawn in the (((service))) of a treachery-loving jew? You have proven yourself wrong several times over, mutt. All I have to do is laugh at your inelegantly executed failures at throwing propaganda to the 'swine'. Fear the old blood, cuck. Try to explain away all of the supposed "nonsense" that you feel (((isn't hu-right))). Beg for mercy, even though none will be shown.*

Is anypony else suddenly reminded of the time(s) Altbrony visited?

so no one can find a photorealistic depiction of a show accurate pony?

>>291679
45 seconds in DuckDuckGo

>>291680
Whew yikes that's terrifying.
>>291655
Also holy moly lay off the fire water kemosabe spilling out into other threads now in your inhebreated state.

>>291679
You're not very bright, are you?

>>291682
>terrifying
If you view it as a multi-cropped image edit, sure. If you use it as a template to imagine a living,moving, talking smol hors and cross reference the dialogue/exchange that might happen with an irl Rarity, I think you'll have a hard time maintaining that position.
For extra credit, you might also cross reference the fact that that's just one sport's attempt, which can be directly paralleled with >pic related

>>291680
but that's not show accurate at all, I am looking for something show accurate for some reason its very rare

>>291655
You are beneath me untermensch. Tis vary obvious that I challenged you to prove the following wrong you ditzy fool.
>y'all are essentially zoophiles in denial, at least in your fantasies. Don't believe me? Then answer me this, do you want to have sex with this mare or whichever you prefer?

>badbrainthought crimethink wrongthink slavery
That sounds awfully totalitarian to me red. Lo, two can play at that game. Your presumptions are just that, presumptions.

>the horrendous anthro pigshit you posted while CLAIMING it to be (((art))) is not only degenerate, it is subversive kike pigshit muttery.
I guess you're not a fan of Lovecraft.
Poor girl you'd make her cry. We don't get to choose what we are, stranger.

Enjoy that little false narrative you schemed up.

>>291685
dj thed's models arent perfect but they are pretty close

why cant we have a photorealistic render of that with proper hair texture and everything?

>>291688
You're going to have to be more specific about what you mean when you say 'photo realistic, show accurate ponies' then, cuz that's just a 3d render

I've noticed the same trend of decline where older pictures seem much more innocent while nowadays the front page is filled with SFM anthro futa trash. Here's my psychological explanation of it. In case you haven't noticed the really high quality art pieces (such as by Koviry or helmie-d) tend to go by underappreciated even if they rival real-life classical art in technique and beauty (tbf I'm not a connoisseur). This seems criminal but MLP is not a community of art critics but of people who love cute ponies, even to the point of obsession. And so what sells is not a "scenery porn" or "technical advanced" picture but one of a favorite character. As it turns out people, like in any other fandom, want as much lewd as SFW art of their favorite characters in a longing for romantic love, but the "vanilla" market is not just saturated but has tons of artists who have perfected their skill to a craft (including Dankflank and Mercurial64 for "anatomically correct" and Hioshiru for "anatomically incorrect). Merely getting noticed, let alone securing a commission in a (likely shrinking) market is difficult to impossible for a middling artist, and so they find more niche markets involving different situations and fetishes. Whereas your average horsefucker will "casually" appreciate vanilla-style lewds with a minority paying for a commission, a far greater percentage of degenerates will pay for commissions from those artists willing to take them. Thus it's easy to see why artists will move from 1) SFW to NSFW and 2) vanilla to increasingly disgusting fetishes, especially if they're unable to continually improve as artists.

The booru-style tag system may also have something to do with it. Really good pictures have only a few tags that set them apart as such, such as "scenery porn," "fine art emulation," or "technical advanced," but because they're much more abstract and soulful the usefulness of tags stops there. Meanwhile there are a host of tags detailing sexual acts, allowing consumers to find exactly what they want. It's much easier to be noticed as a NSFW artist as a result.

>>291143
>back in the days there were furfag forums with hundreds of posts about story of them raping their dogs and the dogs of other people, there probably still are but I dont browse furfag forums obliviously
Collect whatever evidence you can get. I've been arguing with people "no, this isn't healthy, tolerance only lets this degeneracy get worse" and they always respond with some variant of "an individual doesn't define a community." It's a lot harder for them to make that argument if numerous prominent furries have done really disgusting things. A furry redpill thread may be in order. How long has this group of fetishists been around, did they decay and if so when (must have been a long time ago because of Brian Swords of York), what causes this fetish to develop?

>>291160
>anthro is scat/vore tier
Nah, degeneracy has a lowerarchy. Anthro is somewhat degenerate as others have expounded, but you can still have perfectly legitimate and even wholesome pieces of anthro art. Pony/EQG/human porn is inherently degenerate, but less degenerate than anthro porn, just as married porn is less degenerate than that featuring infidelity. One can even make the argument that incest or foalcon is less degenerate than scat/vore. In a more perfect world everyone would be after SFW images and judge them on objective standards, but most consumers and artists still have enough self-control not to fall down the rabbit hole all the way.

On the subject of anthro, and this is particularly directed at the "no, never" faction, how does >pic related rank?

>>291694
If it helps, I heard there's a community of furries called the "Burned Furs" trying to make their own furry fandom without the porn/degeneracy to escape its stigma.

I only like feral with upright locomotion for anthro. what you posted is really bad and I dont even hate anthro on principle.

>>291695
>how does >pic related rank?
"one of the reasons I dont browse this board" rank

furries get the gas

>>291700
In what way is it bad? What criticisms can you level, aside from subjective qualifiers like "I dont like it"?
>>291701
Not an argument, but your ability to not constructively argue has been well established

>>291702
this is the first time I posted here take your meds schizo

considering you're a furfag just swallow the whole tablet of cianide

>>291704
On the off chance that what you say is true, you havent done anything to counter my counterpoint, so it stands. But if you would like to make a reasonable argument, you're welcome to

>>291705
you havent made a point you just asked how your trash ranked

my answer is that it ranks as "valid evidence for a quick lynching"

>>291706
Because its anthro?

>>291706
Your opinion is noted. I don't like anthro but I find your reaction of "No burn it with fire ahhhhh" amusing.

>>291708
>I don't like anthro but I find your reaction of "No burn it with fire ahhhhh" amusing.
its funny until furfags get set on fire for real, then it becomes hilarious

>>291710
Well that was a fail. Let's try again

Indeed it is, but let's have a constructive discussion shall we?
I'll go first, since you're balking.
Furry shit is the worst, as it leads to individuals like Kero the 'wolf' lads, please be precise in your citations, laziness in thought and position is disreputable
Having said, it's quite a leap to suggest that anthro Aryanne is in any way comparable, in that she's a semi-humanized pony who (aside from outliers who either havent bothered to do their homework or are just extreme fetishists) could Be in any way correlated with furries.
Tl;dr its laziness or ignorance that conflates anthro Aryanne with furries, and the degree to which one wantonly does so is a far more telling inference as to who needs gas than whether there are hooves
though, >nohooves is still a thing
(You)r move

>>291712
I dont give a shit furfag, looking forward to the day I gas you

>>291717
>cant into
Duly noted, smoothbrain
not a furfag, but lazy associations are your thing arent they

>>291702
>In what way is it bad? What criticisms can you level, aside from subjective qualifiers like "I dont like it"?
What it boils down to is taste and personal preference.
Some have good taste some not so much.
I wouldn't know how to judge art objectively.
If an artist does a darn good job at designing some fantasy humanoid, sure, I could dig it, why not?
unfortunately this picture falls flat for me, particularly at the head. It just doesn't look very scientific.
It seems to me that just because you like anthro, that doesn't make you a furry. Though it's a slippery slope.
Now please, I'd like to hear your opinion on my post:
>>291634

>>291744
>taste and personal perspective
Thank you, that's precisely the point I was operating toward.
It all boils down to what anon likes and doesnt like. Objectivity be damned.
So, for any out in the periphery, operating among some misguided idea of standards (subjective) or criteria (subjective), theres literally no leg to stand on. Oh, I personally agree that furries are degenerate, but I'm not opposed to using them to prove a point; that point being, anyone who deigns to dictate to others is little more than an authoritarian egomaniac.
Henceforth, can we agree to reason with one another, even if we opt to disagree?
That's literally what the site is based around, beyond horsepussy and politics.
>>291744
>good/bad taste
Sorry, I read that as my/your taste, neither of which is authoritative or objective.
As for the squid girl, she appears as way too young for sexualization. Had she some curves I might reconsider, and for those of likewise (apparent) age I see no conflict.
Tl;dr In a younger life, I would fap to this

>>291745
>she appears as way too young for sexualization
She is way to young I wasn't suggesting that at all, I was just trying to point out that she wouldn't be unsightly IRL. I had to use that picture to get through to that (god I wanna scorn him so bad) ignoramus.

I just discovered Splatoon. Here if you care:
>>291565

>>291749
>I wasnt suggesting
No, that was for somefags ITT wo are wont to take things out of context. And you're right, she's not unseemly, and to my limited understanding of splatoon she might make for an excellent waifu, tentacles included.

>>291695
Anthro in general betrays a lack of commitment, go full human or full pony, not this bullshit halfway abomination unless it's a satyr.

>>291687
Oh wow, the literal jewcuck nigger appears to reinforce his judeo-hegemonic passive-aggressive anthro bullshittery like it matters outside of his (((perfect))) idealism! You went so hard into being THE authoritarian anthro gatekeeping faggot while trying to excuse the pathetic, degenerate fetish shit that you didn't just expose your fake silicone balls on stream for, oh no! You tried to make them seem (((normalized))). Take your HRT pills again and eat that !!impossible whopper!! once more, tranny bitch, then hang yourself like the 41% useless mutt you are. Fact: not even Lovecraft himself could possibly ever find your (((gender))) confused cuckolded shit ironic. Enjoy the hilariously kiked cognitive bias you will eventually die from.

>>291695
Pic related gets you: the gas, the rope, or the bullet. Choose one, and only one.

>>291752
Satyrs are hybrids of either goats or sheep crossed with humans, both of which are awful. The REAL patrician must choose between Ipotanes or Centaurs. They're both complex, and biologically sexy in their own way.

>>291755
Go bump your thread.

>>291752
You're fooling yourself. Anthro lets you modify and enhance the human form in ways that would be horrifyingly jarring on a human.

>>291755
>I dont like things so they're bad
Yeah, you tried that before. Seriously, make an argument or fuck off back where you came from

>>291752
To help you get your point a cross, let me rephrase that for you.
This "antho" we see rife is in bad taste and is rather childish if you ask me. It's just lazy design and there is something corrupting and impure about it. We are made in gods image (not that I'm christian). To corrupt that image with bestial traits is to fall. Please don't take that too seriously.
It can be fun but to give it more value than it actually has and claim it in good taste is ruse.

Of course there are exceptions like satyrs, centaurs, fauns etc. they are exceptions because they're honest and a part of our history. look at what they represent in mythology.

What about anthro plane hilarity?

>>291896
Do you think she's cute?

>>291900
Nope.
Did they really give her fur on her legs?
But regardless that's still a no.
Why do you ask?

>>291900
Seriously nigger, the point of contention is anthro specifically relating to ponies. That's not a justification to post obvious furry shit, for which there is NO contention

>>291900
This looks shopped. I can tell by some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.