Is there anything these people WOULDN'T do for Israel? At this point I'm almost certain that the entire administration would rope itself instantly if Netanyahu asked nicely.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): DEF7BB0D2201B16AC1B45D1923387D98-211872.jpg (206.9 KB, 1200x1139, OOPSSS.jpg)
>>251123
>Is there anything these people WOULDN'T do for Israel?
It is getting less and less likely they would do anything besides grovel for Israel.
>Is there anything these people WOULDN'T do for Israel?
It is getting less and less likely they would do anything besides grovel for Israel.
File (): E20200867EE29FF7C3E727D0495164ED-56378.jpg (55.1 KB, 856x818, wef w W.jpg)
File (): 596EDE44DE25E88AD0D48C90B7BD3EBF-39721.jpg (38.8 KB, 481x572, D-VDlrDWsAAljSw.jpg)
Why the actual fuck would they reverse this shit? That fucking stolen land. They may as well start endorsing burglars and pirates, ffs.
>>251142
>That fucking stolen land
I wasn't referring to Occupied Palestine, but to meme Trump and his backers out of office as a punishment for abandon MAGA.
In the end, what is the difference with H. Clinton?
>That fucking stolen land
I wasn't referring to Occupied Palestine, but to meme Trump and his backers out of office as a punishment for abandon MAGA.
In the end, what is the difference with H. Clinton?
File (): D1893EDDD32E122C12DCF722678FA271-72931.jpg (71.2 KB, 626x484, 2_Jews-LEFT_RIGHT-Copy.jpg)
>>251143
The main difference to me is federal judge appointees, tbh. Republicans have done that relatively well this administration, so that's a small victory wort voting for.
Both sides are fucked though. There is no democratic solution.
The main difference to me is federal judge appointees, tbh. Republicans have done that relatively well this administration, so that's a small victory wort voting for.
Both sides are fucked though. There is no democratic solution.
File (): 34089AB74A119BA74118F92197B072E1-129245.jpg (126.2 KB, 1067x752, EGoNKRtVAAASf-L.jpg)
>>251147
It makes me feel better to nurture hatred for Israel among democrats though. It makes establishment democrats and Jews nervous; plus it hurts democrats politically while giving Israel a headache. Two birds with one stone.
It makes me feel better to nurture hatred for Israel among democrats though. It makes establishment democrats and Jews nervous; plus it hurts democrats politically while giving Israel a headache. Two birds with one stone.
>>251149
What reason do Demonrats have to hate Jews? Besides them seeming white and Muslims also hating them.
What reason do Demonrats have to hate Jews? Besides them seeming white and Muslims also hating them.
>>251152
That's literally it. Palestinians are brown, and Jews look white. The youngest, most progressive democrats are predisposed to favor brown, powerless people over affluent whites; in this case, it's to a good result.
Also, in all actuality, Israel has been getting away with warcrimes for decades, and nobody has dared to oppose them.
That's literally it. Palestinians are brown, and Jews look white. The youngest, most progressive democrats are predisposed to favor brown, powerless people over affluent whites; in this case, it's to a good result.
Also, in all actuality, Israel has been getting away with warcrimes for decades, and nobody has dared to oppose them.
I have my own reasons to want to burn Israel to the ground, but at least it's alright to know that at least somebody in this kike-captured country is starting to get sick of that illegitimate excuse for a state.
>>251123
On the one hand I get it, blah blah Israel blah blah kikes. On the other hand, what exactly is the disadvantage to America here? Other than my general sense of irritation that we still have to waste time and resources intervening in these Israeli/Palestinian disputes instead of just severing ourselves from this region and leaving it to fend for itself, I really see no reason to object to a move like this. It seems like a snub to the EU and the “international order,” which in general I’m in favor of asserting independence from.
On the one hand I get it, blah blah Israel blah blah kikes. On the other hand, what exactly is the disadvantage to America here? Other than my general sense of irritation that we still have to waste time and resources intervening in these Israeli/Palestinian disputes instead of just severing ourselves from this region and leaving it to fend for itself, I really see no reason to object to a move like this. It seems like a snub to the EU and the “international order,” which in general I’m in favor of asserting independence from.
File (): E22F536BCBA55F97E5F463D7018282FB-17109.gif (16.7 KB, 255x190, bbrb a yaz er.gif)
>>251185
Not an answer, but fairly typical of what I’ve come to expect in lieu of one whenever this topic comes up.
Not an answer, but fairly typical of what I’ve come to expect in lieu of one whenever this topic comes up.
>>251178
How do I put this?
Leaving Israel alone would mean leaving it to be destroyed by the Islamists who surround it.
And if Israel isn't destroyed quickly enough, it goes for the Samson Option.
And here I was thinking FE's Ziggers are evil for nuking ponyworld at the end of a war. One who considers nuking the planet something to do if you lose for once... That's a fucking jew. Though if we nuked the world in our dying act as the most oppressed race on planet earth it would be justified.
We have a moral and rational obligation to eliminate Israel before it pushes us to that point.
How do I put this?
Leaving Israel alone would mean leaving it to be destroyed by the Islamists who surround it.
And if Israel isn't destroyed quickly enough, it goes for the Samson Option.
And here I was thinking FE's Ziggers are evil for nuking ponyworld at the end of a war. One who considers nuking the planet something to do if you lose for once... That's a fucking jew. Though if we nuked the world in our dying act as the most oppressed race on planet earth it would be justified.
We have a moral and rational obligation to eliminate Israel before it pushes us to that point.
>>251140
christcucks are starting a big push for what they are calling " Restitution-Based Immigration Reform"
amnesty for "innocent dreamers"
amnesty for illegals who pay a fine
"secure the border"
"deport dangerous illegals"
it's a sell out but evangelicals will support it. qtard boomers will support it. democrats will call it white supremacy at the end of the day and I doubt it will ever get to the floor of the House.
christcucks are starting a big push for what they are calling " Restitution-Based Immigration Reform"
amnesty for "innocent dreamers"
amnesty for illegals who pay a fine
"secure the border"
"deport dangerous illegals"
it's a sell out but evangelicals will support it. qtard boomers will support it. democrats will call it white supremacy at the end of the day and I doubt it will ever get to the floor of the House.
>>251194
>We have a moral and rational obligation to eliminate Israel before it pushes us to that point.
Literally nothing in your stream of consciousness rant leads to this or any other conclusion. As ever, Nigel, your contribution to arts and letters is amusing and appreciated.
>We have a moral and rational obligation to eliminate Israel before it pushes us to that point.
Literally nothing in your stream of consciousness rant leads to this or any other conclusion. As ever, Nigel, your contribution to arts and letters is amusing and appreciated.
>>251197
ucking Evangelicals.
They've been a consistent voter base for Republicans, but that's come at a cost. Their fanatic support for everything Israeli, and their hesitance to enforce our country's borders is poison to the right side of American politics.
Can anyone who knows them explain to me why they love Israel so much and want it to keep stealing land and taking U.S. money? Israelis are Jews, not Christians; leaving them in charge of the holy Land will lead to nothing good.
ucking Evangelicals.
They've been a consistent voter base for Republicans, but that's come at a cost. Their fanatic support for everything Israeli, and their hesitance to enforce our country's borders is poison to the right side of American politics.
Can anyone who knows them explain to me why they love Israel so much and want it to keep stealing land and taking U.S. money? Israelis are Jews, not Christians; leaving them in charge of the holy Land will lead to nothing good.
>>251178
While I'd normally enjoy sticking it to the UN/EU, allowing Jews to get away with acts that the United States would start a war over if it happened in any other country is sickening. If whites aren't allowed to do it, neither should that ratsnest that is Israel.
Why do we send Jews money when they've been annexing lands because they claim that their ancestors may have owned it centuries ago, but we sanction Russia for doing the same thing in Crimea? Why does Israel receive so much international aid when they're a developed country and could fend for themselves? What good does it do for the U.S.to change it's international policies to give the Israelis what they want? We moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and basically told them it's okay to go pillage their neighbors; how does that benefit us in the slightest bit? It's just a testament to our government's loyalty to our kike overlords. It puts the U.S. at a disadvantage because the Israelis have historically worked against our interests, and will continue to do so because that's what they fucking do. It's also humiliating from an American perspective, and makes us look like hypocritical golems on an international platform. I'm tired of this country continuously bowing down to the kikes.
All of the United State's support for Israel is just a tribute to how this country is so criminially owned by Jews. We shouldn't be saying "go ahead and take our money and steal some more land"; we should be taking shit back.
While I'd normally enjoy sticking it to the UN/EU, allowing Jews to get away with acts that the United States would start a war over if it happened in any other country is sickening. If whites aren't allowed to do it, neither should that ratsnest that is Israel.
Why do we send Jews money when they've been annexing lands because they claim that their ancestors may have owned it centuries ago, but we sanction Russia for doing the same thing in Crimea? Why does Israel receive so much international aid when they're a developed country and could fend for themselves? What good does it do for the U.S.to change it's international policies to give the Israelis what they want? We moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and basically told them it's okay to go pillage their neighbors; how does that benefit us in the slightest bit? It's just a testament to our government's loyalty to our kike overlords. It puts the U.S. at a disadvantage because the Israelis have historically worked against our interests, and will continue to do so because that's what they fucking do. It's also humiliating from an American perspective, and makes us look like hypocritical golems on an international platform. I'm tired of this country continuously bowing down to the kikes.
All of the United State's support for Israel is just a tribute to how this country is so criminially owned by Jews. We shouldn't be saying "go ahead and take our money and steal some more land"; we should be taking shit back.
>>251204
The Judeo-Christian idea has its roots in the Reformation. Luther and the other reformers pushed the Bible itself as opposed to Catholic canon as the only authoritative Christian doctrine. They also placed a lot more emphasis on the Old Testament books and the idea that God the father of Christ was the same god as the God of the Hebrews. The long term result was Christianity distancing itself from its Hellenic and Roman influences and embracing more of its Hebraic influences, and a deepening of the idea that Christianity is a continuation of Judaism. The way American Evangelicals see it, Jews and Christians have the same God and their religions are rooted in the same tradition, hence massive support for Israel.
The Judeo-Christian idea has its roots in the Reformation. Luther and the other reformers pushed the Bible itself as opposed to Catholic canon as the only authoritative Christian doctrine. They also placed a lot more emphasis on the Old Testament books and the idea that God the father of Christ was the same god as the God of the Hebrews. The long term result was Christianity distancing itself from its Hellenic and Roman influences and embracing more of its Hebraic influences, and a deepening of the idea that Christianity is a continuation of Judaism. The way American Evangelicals see it, Jews and Christians have the same God and their religions are rooted in the same tradition, hence massive support for Israel.
File (): 81A591FFE47AC37433DF80A8B8F36FD8-273877.png (267.5 KB, 604x364, _martin luther after pol.png)
>>251140
>I wonder how woke are the anons to consider a reversed meme war against Trump.
Give us a better option and Anons will go for it.
>>251194
>And if Israel isn't destroyed quickly enough, it goes for the Samson Option.
Aren't the only people who have to worry about a nuclear strike are those living in the cities (Which account for a extremely small portion of the country)?
>>251204
>Can anyone who knows them explain to me why they love Israel so much and want it to keep stealing land and taking U.S. money? Israelis are Jews, not Christians; leaving them in charge of the holy Land will lead to nothing good.
They've been fed a lie all their life about how the Kikes are "God's chosen people", and "Muh Holocaust" plays a part in it too,
>>251208
> The long term result was Christianity distancing itself from its Hellenic and Roman influences and embracing more of its Hebraic influences, and a deepening of the idea that Christianity is a continuation of Judaism.
Judaism came about as a result and in responce TO Christianity and the fall of Israel to Rome. In fact, the Mishnah was written a almost a century after the books of the New Testiment were written and copied; then the Talmud wasn't collected until a century after the New Testiment has it's central "canonization", and the Talmud was "finalized" almost a century after the New Testiment was "finalized".
>I wonder how woke are the anons to consider a reversed meme war against Trump.
Give us a better option and Anons will go for it.
>>251194
>And if Israel isn't destroyed quickly enough, it goes for the Samson Option.
Aren't the only people who have to worry about a nuclear strike are those living in the cities (Which account for a extremely small portion of the country)?
>>251204
>Can anyone who knows them explain to me why they love Israel so much and want it to keep stealing land and taking U.S. money? Israelis are Jews, not Christians; leaving them in charge of the holy Land will lead to nothing good.
They've been fed a lie all their life about how the Kikes are "God's chosen people", and "Muh Holocaust" plays a part in it too,
>>251208
> The long term result was Christianity distancing itself from its Hellenic and Roman influences and embracing more of its Hebraic influences, and a deepening of the idea that Christianity is a continuation of Judaism.
Judaism came about as a result and in responce TO Christianity and the fall of Israel to Rome. In fact, the Mishnah was written a almost a century after the books of the New Testiment were written and copied; then the Talmud wasn't collected until a century after the New Testiment has it's central "canonization", and the Talmud was "finalized" almost a century after the New Testiment was "finalized".
>>251212
Phoneposting earlier so different ID.
Luther himself took different positions on Jews as well as other specific dogmatic issues throughout his life. By the very end he was a pretty crabby guy and had a lot of angry venom to spit at a number of subjects. My point was not so much that Luther himself or Protestants as a whole liked or supported Jews. For the most part I think there was a pretty strong anti-Jew current in most of Europe at that time and the Protestants overall were mostly on board with it. My point was more that the doctrinal shift from Catholic canon to Biblical literalism placed more of an emphasis on the Hebraic side of the religion, and I think that over time this cemented the idea in the Christian mind that the two religions are inextricably linked somehow.
It's also worth noting that there were intermittent movements to "convert" Jews to Christianity in both the Protestant and Catholic camps throughout that time period.
>Judaism came about as a result and in responce TO Christianity and the fall of Israel to Rome. In fact, the Mishnah was written a almost a century after the books of the New Testiment were written and copied; then the Talmud wasn't collected until a century after the New Testiment has it's central "canonization", and the Talmud was "finalized" almost a century after the New Testiment was "finalized".
I actually didn't know that. Their religious tradition as a whole obviously predates Christianity and the Roman conquest of Judea by quite a bit, but as far as when their various religious texts were canonized or at what point their religion took its modern form I don't know that much about it. If you have some books to recommend on this topic I'd be interested to read them.
Phoneposting earlier so different ID.
Luther himself took different positions on Jews as well as other specific dogmatic issues throughout his life. By the very end he was a pretty crabby guy and had a lot of angry venom to spit at a number of subjects. My point was not so much that Luther himself or Protestants as a whole liked or supported Jews. For the most part I think there was a pretty strong anti-Jew current in most of Europe at that time and the Protestants overall were mostly on board with it. My point was more that the doctrinal shift from Catholic canon to Biblical literalism placed more of an emphasis on the Hebraic side of the religion, and I think that over time this cemented the idea in the Christian mind that the two religions are inextricably linked somehow.
It's also worth noting that there were intermittent movements to "convert" Jews to Christianity in both the Protestant and Catholic camps throughout that time period.
>Judaism came about as a result and in responce TO Christianity and the fall of Israel to Rome. In fact, the Mishnah was written a almost a century after the books of the New Testiment were written and copied; then the Talmud wasn't collected until a century after the New Testiment has it's central "canonization", and the Talmud was "finalized" almost a century after the New Testiment was "finalized".
I actually didn't know that. Their religious tradition as a whole obviously predates Christianity and the Roman conquest of Judea by quite a bit, but as far as when their various religious texts were canonized or at what point their religion took its modern form I don't know that much about it. If you have some books to recommend on this topic I'd be interested to read them.
>>251217
>Their religious tradition as a whole obviously predates Christianity and the Roman conquest of Judea by quite a bit
That's because the entire POINT of Judaism is to preserve the laws of the pharisees:
http://archive.md/y6QHG
http://archive.md/o9Rv3#selection-159.0-159.859
>Their religious tradition as a whole obviously predates Christianity and the Roman conquest of Judea by quite a bit
That's because the entire POINT of Judaism is to preserve the laws of the pharisees:
http://archive.md/y6QHG
http://archive.md/o9Rv3#selection-159.0-159.859
>>251213
Last I looked, (2010 census) it's actually upwards of 80 percent that live in an urban area in the States. Big impact in numbers to be sure.
Last I looked, (2010 census) it's actually upwards of 80 percent that live in an urban area in the States. Big impact in numbers to be sure.
>>251224
that groups in suburbs into greater metropolitan area, despite the city limits of the urban areas ending before suburban jurisdiction. For example, in Nebrasaka the city of Omaha is relegated to two counties, but nearby towns are included in its census despite their sovereignty.
If I remember right, its around 5% in rural areas, 15% in towns/small cities, 30% in suburbs, and 50% in urban.
that groups in suburbs into greater metropolitan area, despite the city limits of the urban areas ending before suburban jurisdiction. For example, in Nebrasaka the city of Omaha is relegated to two counties, but nearby towns are included in its census despite their sovereignty.
If I remember right, its around 5% in rural areas, 15% in towns/small cities, 30% in suburbs, and 50% in urban.
>>251229
Gotcha, that sounds a lot more believable. It seems like fallout would fuck over a lot of the people in said suburbs though- maybe not a majority, but for sure more than an "extremely small percentage"
Gotcha, that sounds a lot more believable. It seems like fallout would fuck over a lot of the people in said suburbs though- maybe not a majority, but for sure more than an "extremely small percentage"
File (): 8C2F9EEFE821B5C0EC000692396F106C-362705.png (354.2 KB, 2392x1273, D1DE87DF-101E-4F0D-970F-CBA4376B63D8.png)
File (): 051654E301D6E5C8613D75C115F5DB5D-779627.png (761.4 KB, 2391x795, 87C010E7-8236-45D9-B678-B646CA7D664C.png)
File (): ED7A1C589ECCF0F3573820AA654EF2E8-133309.png (130.2 KB, 2244x482, FB3359D7-CE70-498E-B504-6F52A5522561.png)
>>251243
Hmmm, major cities are eliminated... points of strategic importance... electronics aren't Hollywood meme tier...
Radiation as in pure radiation can be delt with by having the body cycle more shit that absorbs it...
Implying that major cities are actually targeted.
So cancerous cities fall, some infrastructure is down, the positions (((they))) occupy would be vacated, Europe might be fucked with how close everything is.
If the Jews were to be completely removed, and they do the Sampson option, (just nukes not including other nasty shit, but even then), the world would actually be better off...
Hunh.
With the parasites gone... well the world has been setback for a while, but now has the ability to actually spring back far faster
Hmmm, major cities are eliminated... points of strategic importance... electronics aren't Hollywood meme tier...
Radiation as in pure radiation can be delt with by having the body cycle more shit that absorbs it...
Implying that major cities are actually targeted.
So cancerous cities fall, some infrastructure is down, the positions (((they))) occupy would be vacated, Europe might be fucked with how close everything is.
If the Jews were to be completely removed, and they do the Sampson option, (just nukes not including other nasty shit, but even then), the world would actually be better off...
Hunh.
With the parasites gone... well the world has been setback for a while, but now has the ability to actually spring back far faster
File (): EE970B4E1BBC8F108D166D7E35388AE7-113989.png (111.3 KB, 1040x961, gradually.png)
>>251217
>Luther himself took different positions on Jews as well as other specific dogmatic issues throughout his life. By the very end he was a pretty crabby guy and had a lot of angry venom to spit at a number of subjects.
Huh, I can relate.
>Luther himself took different positions on Jews as well as other specific dogmatic issues throughout his life. By the very end he was a pretty crabby guy and had a lot of angry venom to spit at a number of subjects.
Huh, I can relate.
>>251189
>Not an answer
And what do you expect? Your post style is consistent with a hostile philo-judaic attitude.
If you are a chan's acquaintance, you already know the answer and your question has malicious intent.
If you are a new fag and you don't know, then lurk moar.
>Not an answer
And what do you expect? Your post style is consistent with a hostile philo-judaic attitude.
If you are a chan's acquaintance, you already know the answer and your question has malicious intent.
If you are a new fag and you don't know, then lurk moar.
>>251213
>Give us a better option and Anons will go for it.
>better option
There's no good choices for the West.
And what is left are two bad choices, slow country disintegration and tyranny progressing; or, shocking acceleration resulting in bloody unrest.
The former choice is less painful but in the end is sure displacement, enslavement and even death; the later means horrible suffering and the end of countries as were known, but also a chance for freedom.
>Give us a better option and Anons will go for it.
>better option
There's no good choices for the West.
And what is left are two bad choices, slow country disintegration and tyranny progressing; or, shocking acceleration resulting in bloody unrest.
The former choice is less painful but in the end is sure displacement, enslavement and even death; the later means horrible suffering and the end of countries as were known, but also a chance for freedom.
>>251273
>two bad choices
If you really believe this then you're not very creative. You don't need to sit back and do nothing or engage in violence, at least not at this point. Rather, engaging in agorism, setting up alternative networks, gaining material, intellectual and human capital, and infiltrating or replacing cucked institutions are just a sample of things we can do outside of the democratic process. Instinctively we're already doing it and making good progress, but better thought-out planning and tactics are essential to fomenting a cultural revival before the West collapses. They are strategies any successful movement–including now-dominant left-wing movements–has put into practice to redefine the political landscape. No matter what path you take you MUST have resources you can count on, spheres of influence, networks and support structures.
>two bad choices
If you really believe this then you're not very creative. You don't need to sit back and do nothing or engage in violence, at least not at this point. Rather, engaging in agorism, setting up alternative networks, gaining material, intellectual and human capital, and infiltrating or replacing cucked institutions are just a sample of things we can do outside of the democratic process. Instinctively we're already doing it and making good progress, but better thought-out planning and tactics are essential to fomenting a cultural revival before the West collapses. They are strategies any successful movement–including now-dominant left-wing movements–has put into practice to redefine the political landscape. No matter what path you take you MUST have resources you can count on, spheres of influence, networks and support structures.
>>251272
> Your post style is consistent with a hostile philo-judaic attitude.
Lol wut?
>If you are a chan's acquaintance, you already know the answer and your question has malicious intent.
I’ve been skulking around chans for well over a decade now, probably longer than you. In any case, I asked a perfectly valid question. At least >>251207 wrote an actual response. That Swiss proxy I responded to just baselessly accused me of being JIDF, and you called me a philo-Jewish whatever the hell you said, I’m too lazy to scroll up and read it again. Both responses are just silly stormfag boilerplate and neither addresses the question I asked, so as far as I’m concerned you’re both massive fags.
I have no malicious intent, I’m just getting tired of constantly having to listen to all the spergy stormfag nonsense about Jews and Israel. In this particular case, I’m simply asking what reason there is to get booty bothered about this policy change when looked at purely from the perspective of US interest.
I can understand and respect that >>251207 objects on moral grounds to Israel possessing this particular piece of land. For myself, though, I don’t particularly care who settles on the West Bank or who thinks they have the better claim to it. As far as I’m concerned the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is just a bunch of sand people fighting over sand, and I really don’t care that much which side ends up with which territory. They can blow each other to smithereens for as many fucks as I give.
My only dog in the fight is that I would prefer the US get out of it entirely. We’re probably more or less in agreement that the US/Israel alliance is a waste of America’s time and resources. Since that alliance doesn’t seem likely to end while the boomer generation is alive, it seems like a waste of energy to gripe about it when there are more important issues to worry about.
> Your post style is consistent with a hostile philo-judaic attitude.
Lol wut?
>If you are a chan's acquaintance, you already know the answer and your question has malicious intent.
I’ve been skulking around chans for well over a decade now, probably longer than you. In any case, I asked a perfectly valid question. At least >>251207 wrote an actual response. That Swiss proxy I responded to just baselessly accused me of being JIDF, and you called me a philo-Jewish whatever the hell you said, I’m too lazy to scroll up and read it again. Both responses are just silly stormfag boilerplate and neither addresses the question I asked, so as far as I’m concerned you’re both massive fags.
I have no malicious intent, I’m just getting tired of constantly having to listen to all the spergy stormfag nonsense about Jews and Israel. In this particular case, I’m simply asking what reason there is to get booty bothered about this policy change when looked at purely from the perspective of US interest.
I can understand and respect that >>251207 objects on moral grounds to Israel possessing this particular piece of land. For myself, though, I don’t particularly care who settles on the West Bank or who thinks they have the better claim to it. As far as I’m concerned the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is just a bunch of sand people fighting over sand, and I really don’t care that much which side ends up with which territory. They can blow each other to smithereens for as many fucks as I give.
My only dog in the fight is that I would prefer the US get out of it entirely. We’re probably more or less in agreement that the US/Israel alliance is a waste of America’s time and resources. Since that alliance doesn’t seem likely to end while the boomer generation is alive, it seems like a waste of energy to gripe about it when there are more important issues to worry about.
37 replies | 12 files | 18 UUIDs | Archived