>>176366>There's all sorts of things they did but how did they do it? Romans weren't way too special most civilizations devolve into empire like them. Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, and India all followed before and around the same time as they did, while the Ottomans, Aztecs, Incans, and Northern Chinese did after them. Eventually Burgerland will be in a similar situation. Its just part of the evolution of a culture all are bound to go through. At the start of a culture meaning is found by internalizing culture into oneself. Eventually its flipped into externalizing it, by economic and political expansion so creating an empire.
>>176366>Better yet, what can we learn from them to improve society of today? You can't improve a depraved society or civilization, the path to collapse is already drawn.
As symptom of what is happening please take a look to this video; it is very revealing.
-Why Women DESTROY NATIONS * / CIVILIZATIONS - and other UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw >>176394Interesting video. Success = failure. What is a cycle?
The video misattributes the reason for the drop in fertility rates. This is directly related to contraception availability. Which had its start when the wars caused men to bring sexual diseases back home. So condoms got distributed to soldiers in WWI. That leads to the 1920s Family Planning as the concept came home. So plenty of blame for the men also. Following this we have the roaring 20's degeneracy. (Notice the pattern here: war, contraception, degeneracy of the 1920s, repeated again with WWII, The Pill, hippies)
It is understandable that women don't want to be baby making machines, but society needs babies. This isn't resolvable where everyone will be happy.
What we all want is pleasure without responsibility (sexual communism? Someone else will make the babies!). Men like sluts and women have rape fantasies. It's the same underlying thing, libre sex.
It isn't just women that embrace chaos/freedom in a successful society, men do also. It's more fun to be selfish, than selfless. So societies oscillate between fun/freedom/chaos and selfless/order/tyrant.
And there are no solutions. Because every ideology will generate an opposing ideology. Every striving for order will have rebels looking for freedom. Ultimately we are predators upon ourselves, dehumanising the other side.
Free people are the cycle. We freely choose to boom and bust as we emotionally react to each stepping stone around the circle. When there is too much liberty/degeneracy the tyrant comes, and when the tyrant is too much the hippies come. Round and round we go.
>>176400>It is understandable that women don't want to be baby making machines, but society needs babies. This isn't resolvable where everyone will be happy.>And there are no solutions. Because every ideology will generate an opposing ideology.Correct.
But I inclined to believe that there is a solution to our present challenge, nevertheless, our civilization currently is unwilling to pay the unavoidable toll.
This price most likely will be bloody as hell; women will loose their privileges to adapt to their natural role, as well men will abandon their hedonistic desires to embrace a racial destiny.
And yes, this implies total fascism.
>>176402So what are your plans for those gun wielding libertarians?
>>176402And are you making contraception illegal?
>>176480>>176481>So what are your plansIf this is not trolling, then I see a parallel with a e-celebs debate: Sargon vs. Spencer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUx6eZhmddc >>176540Care to explain the pic? I'm not super caught up on sarcuck
>>176549Soygon is bad at debating and makes strawmen arguments