It’s hard to tell but all the above
>>123172Focus Anon, pay attention to the details...
>[greedy hand rubbing sounds]*
>>123171She eats poo by the way. Just thought you should know.
>>123171>all the shills ittHe's just riling up the conservative base so they go out to vote this year, it's literally 444444444D chess. As soon as elections are over he'll denounce any attempts at infringing on the 2nd amendment.
i mean has anything actually happened or is he just talking? he said a lot of things about DACA too but it's still going to die in four days
If this isn't 1488D chess, I'm fucking done with him.
This is a no-touch issue. Period.
They get so excited by his support they forget that he's not the government. There still is a congress to go through.
What is more likely to pass, a bill that gives psychologists the right to revoke someone's 2nd amendment rights, or a bill that does that, AND bans "assault rifles"?
On top of this, what will this do to their narrative? Isn't Trump the big bad, the Literallyhitler, whose words define what you disagree with?
And if THEIR bill doesn't go through even with Trump's support, maybe they'll support his coming acts to drain the swamp?
I'm not saying this is his plan, but if it were, it really would be 1488D chess.
>>123431I think this is Trump bumbling into creating an unintentional trap for the Dems. If the Dems go with Trump, their hardliners will freak and pull their support. If the Dems remain loyal to the hardliners, they will lose hardliner support. Painting Trump as Hitler 2.0 is putting the entire Democratic party into an untenable position.
>>123441Headlines: "Trump wants to seize nation's guns"
How quickly would the liberals come to the defense of the 2nd?
>>123431>>123441Wrong. They'll rejoice at turning the top guy for the Right. They'll see it as having "broken" him, and try to get him to do more of what (((they))) want. Narrative be damned, they only use it when it suits them.
Just a week ago I was thinking of donating to his campaign. Never will now. I won't vote for him either if he keeps this up.
There are two options: either he's backstabbing his voters (which is par for the course in Washington) or he's trying to finagle some improbable deal out of the Democrats. If it's the former he's betrayed us and we write him off for good. If it's the latter he shouldn't be using our sacrosanct rights as a bargaining chip anyway. The only good that can come from this is that it may shake gun-owners out of complacency and stop trusting Republican politicians for their party affiliation alone.
>>123453Never. Some naive libertarians thought they could redpill liberals into realizing centralized government is evil, but that would require a functioning brain. SJWs will always be against gun rights and any freedom at all.
The Huffington Post, my sides.
>>123431It's not the first time Trump lets the fish go off a bit before reeling. He did it before with things like the border wall.
This, and happy merchant memes make themselves.
>>123520Wtf? This is a Huffpo article?
I don't get the sensationalized fervor here. Most of what Trump has suggested is nothing scathing except extending the legal age to buy a rifle from 18 to 21.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-trump/trump-pushes-congress-for-broad-bill-on-guns-after-school-shooting-idUSKCN1GC2M0Most if not all of this seems like concern trolling from liberal publications.
Webm...
You just can't really make this shit up...
I wonder if Trump is doing this as part of negotiations for the wall and DACA. Want our guns? Then fund the wall and support harsher immigration.
>>124483Unacceptable on any level.
Guns are the fallback. Always.