/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/


Archived thread


022618_mayor.jpg
Oakland mayor warns of impending ICE raid
Anonymous
3Kf1C
?
No.122273
122351 122383 122398 122456 122490 123034 123059 125303
>The mayor of a sanctuary city in California issued a warning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could be conducting a raid in the area as soon as Sunday
>Libby Schaaf, the Democratic mayor of Oakland, shared the warning — which she said she “learned from multiple credible sources” — in a press release on Saturday, “not to panic our residents but to protect them,”
>Schaaf during a news conference on Sunday also said she told mayors of other Bay Area cities of the impending ICE sweep,
>Her tweet on Saturday aligned with previous reports that law enforcement officials in Northern California would not cooperate with ICE, and noted state law “prohibits business owners from assisting ICE agents in immigration enforcement and bars federal agents from accessing employee-only areas.”
>Schaaf, who is seeking reelection, said in January that she’d be willing to go to jail to defend the city’s sanctuary city status, and has openly opposed the Trump administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration.
Source: http://archive.is/OkoN2
Are female politicians a mistake?
Anonymous
4l5rt
?
No.122275
122280
>Are female politicians a mistake?
Females having rights is a mistake.
Anonymous
t6gfk
?
No.122280
>>122275
This. Take away their voting rights and driving licenses away. Everything will come back to desired state of affairs.
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.122351
>>122273
Can we revoke California's rights as a state? It's not like they do anything good with them.
Anonymous
JEMls
?
No.122383
123423
17458358_1284287591607410_2180021233720783503_n.jpg
>>122273
When does hunting season start?
Anonymous
E1qWZ
?
No.122398
>>122273
bye bye beans
Anonymous
eDkG9
?
No.122456
122463 122470 123059
>>122273
>state law “prohibits business owners from assisting ICE agents in immigration enforcement and bars federal agents from accessing employee-only areas.”
So they have a state law that forces their citizens to break federal laws... How would this pan out in federal court?
Anonymous
cNRIy
?
No.122463
122468 122470
>>122456
The Fed is De Facto more powerful than the States. Don't know of any court cases yet, but federal could probably hit people with obstruction of justice.
Anonymous
eDkG9
?
No.122468
122470
>>122463
I really hope they smack down hard on businesses that refuses to comply with ICE agents. I would guess they in addition to obstruction of justice there would be aiding and abetting a criminal, and if you stretched it a little bit you probably could add human trafficking to the charges. And probably much, much, more. Also would be fun if they RICO'ed the whole State for forcing people through intimidation of false imprisonment to break federal law on the States behalf.
Anonymous
jlrT+
?
No.122470
122476
>>122456
>>122463
>>122468
I think it could be brought up as a free speech issue as the law prevents Californians from helping ICE agents whether they want to or not, it would be different if it simply said cali residents cannot be forced to aid ICE agents. It cant be obstruction of justice from the business owners because their state is the one making that choice for them.
Anonymous
eDkG9
?
No.122476
122481
>>122470
>it would be different if it simply said cali residents cannot be forced to aid ICE agents
Aren't you legally obligated to cooperate with federal and other law-enforcement agencies? Okay you can plead the fifth, but you can't deny access to areas if they have a warrant.

>their state is the one making that choice for them
Would the state be considered the guilty party and can be made accountable in federal court?
Also could the Californian law that forces people to break federal law be considered an secession from the union, i.e. break the treaty California signed when they entered the union?
Anonymous
jlrT+
?
No.122481
122489
>>122476
Yes I should have worded it better, you aren't obligated unless they have a warrant.
The ICE agents could start by prosecuting a business owner in a federal court, but presuming the business owner would bring up the state law the court should then say the owner was compelled to break the federal law by fear of breaking the state law and therefore the state of California is the "guilty" party.
I don't think it would be seen as secession, just creating an unconstitutional law, secession needs them to break away from the union to some capacity, if they were to continue enforcing the law after they were told it was unconstitutional that could be secession.
Anonymous
eDkG9
?
No.122489
>>122481
Let's hope this will be tried in a court to determine the legality. Hopefully, perhaps, it will end with the creation of Commifornia (without the rural areas that will want to stay in the union).
Anonymous
R7Y2Z
?
No.122490
122715
>>122273
Isn't this aiding and abetting criminals or obstruction of justice?
Anonymous
QZLWh
?
No.122492
safety rules for a reason1.png
>Libby Schaaf
I hate this bitch so much...
Anonymous
AsPGc
?
No.122715
122868
>>122490
Since CA's AG the states' top law enforcement official (and plainly with the full cooperation of the state Executive) declared penalties on it's citizens for cooperation with the Federal government, the government of Commiefornia is technically in a state of open sedition against the United States.

This is exactly the type of precursor that led to the situation from which the US fought it's Civil War.
Anonymous
eDkG9
?
No.122868
122873 123037
>>122715
>Commiefornia is technically in a state of open sedition against the United States.
Could the United States on the base of that say that Commiefornia is no longer a part of the union, thus skipping the tedious process that Commiefornia would go through to ask for a secession themselves?
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.122873
>>122868
Who knows, maybe this would jumpstart the process of Jefferson leaving Commifornia, too.
Anonymous
eDkG9
?
No.122992
123037
920x920.jpg
>ICE confirms 150-plus arrests in California sweep, slams Schaaf’s early warning
>Federal officials said Tuesday they arrested more than 150 undocumented immigrants in a Northern California sweep aimed at countering local sanctuary laws, while suggesting Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf’s decision to alert the public to the secret operation may have allowed some targets to elude capture.
>Since Sunday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers have fanned out from the Central Valley to the far northern reaches of the state, knocking on doors, detaining people and prompting alarm from community activists and some Democratic politicians who oppose President Trump’s immigration crackdown.
>Agency officials, who had remained silent about the operation for three days, said in a written statement that they arrested people in cities including San Francisco, Bay Point, Sacramento and Stockton, and that half of those arrested had criminal convictions, including for violent crimes.
>The operation was named Keep Safe. Officials did not say whether the first letters of the operation were intended as a reference to Kate Steinle, the San Francisco woman shot dead on a bay pier in July 2015 by a homeless undocumented immigrant. ICE also did not say whether the sweep was over.
>“Sanctuary jurisdictions like San Francisco and Oakland shield dangerous criminal aliens from federal law enforcement at the expense of public safety,” said Thomas Homan, the acting director of ICE. “Because these jurisdictions prevent ICE from arresting criminal aliens in the secure confines of a jail, they also force ICE officers to make more arrests out in the community, which poses increased risks for law enforcement and the public.”
>Homan slammed Schaaf, who on Saturday night released an unprecedented warning that ICE was about to begin arresting people. Schaaf said she issued the alert after receiving confidential tips from “credible sources,” and conferring with attorneys to make sure she wasn’t opening herself up to federal prosecution.
>The mayor’s move endangered ICE officers and alerted their targets, Homan asserted, “making clear that this reckless decision was based on her political agenda.” He said 864 “criminal aliens and public safety threats remain at large in the community, and I have to believe that some of them were able to elude us thanks to the mayor’s irresponsible decision.”
http://archive.is/4XFXw
Anonymous
EYodl
?
No.123034
>>122273
>Are female politicians a mistake?
Never, not on any level of government, they're too emotionally minded to wield authority properly. See Germany.
Anonymous
AsPGc
?
No.123037
123155 123211
>>122868
Absolutely fucking not. California is literally some of the finest land in the entire world. No way do we capitulate to the libshit commies and turn our lands over to them and beanshits. What would Dr. William Pierce think of you for saying such a thing anon?

>>122992
Can you imagine the outcome if the Governor declares a state of emergency over Federal agents deporting the guaranteed votes of Mexico's Best™ back into their own native lands? **Inb4 CA National Guard in open armed conflict with US Army regulars**

Anonymous
qwdK0
?
No.123059
>>122273

I'm pretty sure that the timing of when a law enforcement agency is going to conduct its raids is considered classified information. She could be punished under the Espionage Act, and if not, this is at least Obstruction of Justice.

>>122456

The way it's worded is not so much that it requires you to break federal law, as it is requiring you to do everything within your legal authority to stop them. A law cannot reasonably compel you to break another law.

More or less, anything short of a warrant/subpoena/whatever and you have to tell the federal government to kindly come back with a little more legal authority.
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.123155
>>123037
>spoiler
I know Commifornia is trying to be like Australia when it comes to guns, but wouldn't you also see some rural homegrown militias rising up against the National Guard?
Anonymous
70rfg
?
No.123211
123214 123298
>>123037
>finest land
You have no idea how tainted Commiefornia's land is. Commiefornia was the first to make widespread use of mercurial salts, arsenic, and other (((Monsanto, Beyer, & Smith-Kline))) products as weed and insect killers, as well as the first to utilize highly toxic synthetic "fertilizers" under subsidy. Commiefornia produce is the lowest quality in the world and their wines are filled with synthetic additives such as free glutamic acid to mask the taste of chemicals and preserved with a class 4 toxic substance called propylene glycol. It'll be 50 years before that shit degrades in the soil and another 50 years before full environmental recovery happens.
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.123214
123227
>>123211
I can't even remember the last time I've seen produce from Commifornia.
Anonymous
rxr4+
?
No.123227
123275
>>123214
Beef, cheese, tomatoes, corn, almonds, grapes (wine/raisin), etc; the soil in CA is quite viable in many areas and translates into a variety of crops and produce, not to mention alfalfa and hay for livestock.
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.123275
>>123227
Again, I haven't seen any of those from Commifornia in any of the stores near here.
Anonymous
AsPGc
?
No.123298
123299 123300
>>123211
No, the only real taint going on in Commiefornia is the taint of libshits and Mexican nationals invading it's land. The state itself is amazing. I've lived in SF, San Jose, San Diego, and now LA. It's all remarkable especially the Bay Area. And that's not even taking the Northern California region into account, or the mountains. A drive on The 1 is breathtaking in beauty.

You trying to cast the state as if it were one gigantic Superfund site is complete hogwash.
Anonymous
JEMls
?
No.123299
123306
>>123298
got any inside news on that "New California" thing?
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.123300
123303
>>123298
Sorry, Anon, but most everyone outside of Commifornia who doesn't live in a similar libshit state sees it as a hellhole, and generally wants to see it sink into the ocean.

Might visit New California or Jefferson or whatever they decide to call it once the rural areas are freed from liberal oppression, though.
Anonymous
AsPGc
?
No.123303
123307 123308
>>123300
The reason everyone hates it, and rightly so, is because of the libshits and beaners, not the land itself. Learn the difference. Wars aren't won by limpwristed capitulation to the enemy. Let the faggots do that. And BTW I've lived all across this country, and was born and raised in the Midwest hill country. I probably have a better understanding than most of what's good and bad about this nation.
Anonymous
AsPGc
?
No.123306
>>123299
No more than anyone else. The primary point is the traditional Whites of this state being absolutely fed up with the commies running the state for the Dems. Personally I don't think New California will happen. I hope I'm wrong.
Anonymous
JEMls
?
No.123307
123309 123310
>>123303
>I probably have a better understanding than most of what's good and bad about this nation.
>of most

I was going to try and knock you off your high horse but then I remembered most Americans live in cities and never leave their own neighbor hoods, or even their houses.
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.123308
>>123303
The reasons don't matter, people still hate the state, land and all.
Anonymous
JEMls
?
No.123309
>>123307
most of*

damn it im tired.
Anonymous
AsPGc
?
No.123310
123311 123387
>>123307
I'm not on a high horse anon. I'm simply pointing out that rolling over and letting the kike-controlled commies succeed in stealing what is arguably the finest state in the union out from under us is ridiculous in the extreme. What would Dr. Pierce think of that idea?
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.123311
123676
1491184558403.png
>>123310
>what is arguably the finest state in the union
Okay, NOW I know you're full of bullshit.
Anonymous
JEMls
?
No.123387
123606
union states.png
>>123310
>union
well considering the states that were in the union dont set a very high bar anon.
Anonymous
+hLV9
?
No.123423
cat1519921923708.jpg
>>122383
Not soon enough. But the vast majority of people are content to just larp and rant on mandarin basket weaving forums instead of actually doing anything. If there was a sufficient catalyst then perhaps things would kick off.
Anonymous
QZLWh
?
No.123424
2f1f89e30552b72384a7e7f42b6312000abee9135fc4ed9b358f183aebf93661.png
150 INVADERS ARRESTED IN FAG-INFESTED SAN FRANCISO
Last Updated Feb 28, 2018 4:11 AM EST
>SAN FRANCISCO – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested more than 150 people since the weekend in the greater San Francisco Bay Area who they say were in violation of federal immigration laws during activity, ICE officials announced Tuesday. The numbers came from a press release issued by officials, CBS San Francisco reports.
>ICE agents and Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) deportation officers started conducting what the agency termed "targeted immigration enforcement operations" in the area Sunday.
>The aim of the operation was to arrest individuals who have violated U.S. immigration laws. Agents worked on leads developed by the local field offices in conjunction with the National Criminal Analysis and Targeting Center (NCATC).
>According to the press release, about half of the individuals arrested also had past criminal convictions in addition to their immigration violations, including convictions for assault and battery, crimes against children, weapons charges and DUI.
https://archive.fo/AaYso
Anonymous
UcC4Y
?
No.123606
123607
>>123387
To be fair he wasn't talking about that union (also, finest state in both is Vermont) but the Confederate States didn't exactly set the highest bar either.
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.123607
123609 123857
>>123606
Vermont is clearly better, I'll give you that.

If we could remove the beaners, though, I'd say Texas is the best state.
Anonymous
uNDyS
?
No.123609
123612
>>123607
Texas will never remove beaners
Anonymous
RNmHf
?
No.123612
>>123609
Sad, but true. At least, not until we can reclaim our nation.
Anonymous
MR4T3
?
No.123676
>>123311
I think he means the land is (was) the finest, not its people.
Anonymous
R7xH9
?
No.123857
123889 124436 125262
>>123607
Personally, I don't think Texas would be a better state than Vermont even without the Mexicans. Vermont had nicer weather (in my opinion), less natural disasters, less strict gun laws, more to do outside, and a nicer environment (these two also being opinions). I can see the appeal of Texas but it would be difficult to convince me that it would be better than Vermont, even without Mexicans. Also, nice thing about Vermont's constitution is that it gives citizens the right to keep and bear arms which is nice because even if the nuts in the Democratic party get rid of the second amendment, they still won't have gotten Vermont unless they give the feds way more authority.
In fact, guns are so embedded in the culture of Vermont that even people I know there who attended the women's march own rifles or handguns and it is considered normal for there to perhaps be an empty case or two on the porch. And I like that.
Anonymous
BG0/h
?
No.123889
124383
>>123857
Vermont elected Burnie Sanders though.
Anonymous
UcC4Y
?
No.124383
124436
>>123889
However, in the primaries the republican candidate most supported was Trump and the democrat most supported was Bernie, while in Texas it was Cruz and Clinton, who were both very obviously in bed with the banks.
Anonymous
FBs7q
?
No.124436
124617
1513221805661.png
>>123857
>>124383
>all this Vermont vs. Texas
>Not realizing the real best state
Anonymous
70rfg
?
No.124617
124702
>>124436
Florida has been owned by the CIA, NSA, NASA which is a hebrew word that means "to deceive", the ATF, which has sold illegal weapons to various cartels, gangs, and other degenerate factions since its creation, the DEA which was created to support & implement the flow of semi-synthetic and synthetic drugs within the US and other nations. Florida holds major links to the Federal Reserve, a jewISH parasite owned banking institution which controls the IRS & also owns the Secret Service, also a branch of the Treasury Department which originated through the 1791 England-American Agreement. Likewise: Google, Amazon, MicroSoft, CISCO Systems, Disney, VIACOM, Ma Bell, and other jewISH owned companies hold massive political, cultural, social, and monetary power in Florida.
Anonymous
DAvGU
?
No.124637
>>124624
Boy, don’t you see you have already lost?
Anonymous
pQClY
?
No.124702
124719 124725
>>124617
yeah but on the other hand they have alligators and sex offenders.
Anonymous
FBs7q
?
No.124719
>>124702
The oranges are nice too
Anonymous
AeYa4
?
No.124725
125264
>>124702
no Louisianan has the alligators Florida has the crocodiles
Anonymous
lD/Vf
?
No.125262
125363
>>123857
Me, I like variety. Spring in TX for the bluebonnets, and a stopover in the lovely Four Corners region and Flagstaff for the best weather, then late spring and early summer in Northern CA for hiking and more wildflowers, late summer and fall in Vermont, a snowy Christmas then back to Texas for some mellow winter weather.

Something like that. I like Florida, it's a dynamic and beautiful place, but the humidity is fucked up and it's very corrupt and weird in a bad way. Cuban food and tiki bars rock, though.
Anonymous
FBs7q
?
No.125264
>>124725
Nope, we have the gators too
Anonymous
qlrQ2
?
No.125303
>>122273
Obstruction.

Arrest her.
Anonymous
UcC4Y
?
No.125363
>>125262
Aye. I think it is probably just different preferences, as I like to stay in one place and enjoy the hunkering down for cold winters, so Vermont has the best conditions for me since it has basically all the activities I enjoy (hiking, skiing, snowshoeing, bicycling, etc.) but without having to go out of state. Basically, I think the difference is probably that you are a bit more adventurous than I, so I enjoy staying in a place that fits most of my wants while you like to travel.
;