I won't link any msm spinsters here, but the "anti-diversity memo" author James Damore is suing Google after he was fired for a 'controversial' internal document.
In the document, he states caveats that he supports the virtues of inclusion for all individuals. He drafted the document on an internal Google forum seeking feedback, and incorporated that feedback over time. He then e-mailled a memo to HR and company diversity officers with a note asking why programs that include minorities and women, but not white males, were considered acceptable business practice. He also questioned the legality of hiring quotas for women and minorities, since their desired career paths in society may not match the discriminatory quotas demanded by the company.
Pic related is just a few of the many gems from this lawsuit and its exhibits. HR systematically ignored him, a director actually threatened him, and he was terminated for raising concerns about company discrimination. Any fair court would know how to rule.
Read the full lawsuit here: https://www.scribd.com/document/368692388/James-Damore-Lawsuit
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 82400C0C70123AF9F9ADF5AC85669428-137188.jpg (134.0 KB, 1024x635, IMG_5180.JPG)
File (): 308BD214122CF5F7C4691591E3461E90-150877.png (147.3 KB, 737x2671, IMG_5184.PNG)
File (): A124DAFD8E259203AE7279B1BE612BE4-75028.jpg (73.3 KB, 692x264, IMG_5185.JPG)
File (): 86F293DD9C07B16D73C8BA4138B20653-70859.jpg (69.2 KB, 1024x413, IMG_5189.JPG)
>>105005
I wonder: If one were to go full-blown parody of the left at Google, would it not just help one's ability to blend into the company?
You may not like it, but this is what peak diversity looks like.
White males need not apply.
I wonder: If one were to go full-blown parody of the left at Google, would it not just help one's ability to blend into the company?
You may not like it, but this is what peak diversity looks like.
White males need not apply.
>>105007
Whether or not he wins is inconsequential. What matters is that someone is publicly challenging the established order. What's more, it's not some rabid alt-right Dicky Spencer type who would be easy for the left to just dismiss as another extremist, it's an ordinary person who was fired for making a perfectly well-reasoned objection to an unfair company policy. The average person can sympathize with this guy, and might begin to worry about the same thing happening to them. There's going to be more cases like this. It's a sign that the left is losing and the right is gaining momentum.
Whether or not he wins is inconsequential. What matters is that someone is publicly challenging the established order. What's more, it's not some rabid alt-right Dicky Spencer type who would be easy for the left to just dismiss as another extremist, it's an ordinary person who was fired for making a perfectly well-reasoned objection to an unfair company policy. The average person can sympathize with this guy, and might begin to worry about the same thing happening to them. There's going to be more cases like this. It's a sign that the left is losing and the right is gaining momentum.
>>105031
Only if others follow
A leader becomes a leader once a second person follows. A leader is a nutcase when no one follows.
Only if others follow
A leader becomes a leader once a second person follows. A leader is a nutcase when no one follows.
>>105034
The best way to make someone follow is to make it know that someone stood up and fought against the leftist agenda. One way that would get media cover is if one hijacked the #meetoo tag and all posts referenced this case "I have also experienced this form of discrimination [image of the lawsuit] #meetoo". It could backfire, but if all posts somehow referenced this one case it will be harder to discredit it as an attack from the "alt-right".
The best way to make someone follow is to make it know that someone stood up and fought against the leftist agenda. One way that would get media cover is if one hijacked the #meetoo tag and all posts referenced this case "I have also experienced this form of discrimination [image of the lawsuit] #meetoo". It could backfire, but if all posts somehow referenced this one case it will be harder to discredit it as an attack from the "alt-right".
File (): 3A06BECD330926F9C6F1E55450101B7B-91562.jpg (89.4 KB, 600x287, IMG_20180110_061907.jpg)
>>105005
>Should we link ti academic findings that may support incorrect stereotypes?
Jesus these people are insane. They want to censor science because reality conflicts with their world view. What do they think burying the truth will make it less true?
>Should we link ti academic findings that may support incorrect stereotypes?
Jesus these people are insane. They want to censor science because reality conflicts with their world view. What do they think burying the truth will make it less true?
>>105054
Sorry for bump- phoneposter.
I would disagree with that assessment. The problem is that immediately after one Jack Prosobiec or Mike Cernovich retweets one of these posts, the msm will go into turbo disinfo mode and call it an "alt-right campaign" in all its headlines.
Check 'em.
Sorry for bump- phoneposter.
I would disagree with that assessment. The problem is that immediately after one Jack Prosobiec or Mike Cernovich retweets one of these posts, the msm will go into turbo disinfo mode and call it an "alt-right campaign" in all its headlines.
Check 'em.
>>105185
True they will likely call it an "alt-right campaign". But the message they also will have to raise is the one referenced. That case has nothing to do with the "alt-right". And many centrists will agree with his case and be informed about it, and they won't see it as an "alt-right campaign" but as an legitimate question to raise. I just see this as an way to get the established media to cover the case. If it is as it is now they won't mention it at all but bury it. And the established media will no matter what run an anti white story anyway, so this way we can use them for something useful.
But a Trump tweet supporting this man will also do wonders.
True they will likely call it an "alt-right campaign". But the message they also will have to raise is the one referenced. That case has nothing to do with the "alt-right". And many centrists will agree with his case and be informed about it, and they won't see it as an "alt-right campaign" but as an legitimate question to raise. I just see this as an way to get the established media to cover the case. If it is as it is now they won't mention it at all but bury it. And the established media will no matter what run an anti white story anyway, so this way we can use them for something useful.
But a Trump tweet supporting this man will also do wonders.
11 replies | 5 files | 1 UUIDs | Archived