/go/ - Golden Oaks

Thread Repository


Welcome to the new code.
If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
Note: JS is required to be able to post, but I am working on a system where that won't be needed.


mlpol parlment with seats.png
/mlpol/ Parlement
Anonymous
MAQaR
?
No.2738
2739 2743 2745 2748 2768 2778 2822 2835 2979 3061 3183
Let’s play a game /mlpol/. We create a parliament and create board rules and make other things regarding the board.

>How does it work.
Step one, we need some political parties. For a party to exist you need to write up a party manifesto make a logo and chose a color. The manifesto must also state where you lie on political issues, this can be super broad or very specific, but the more people that understand what you stand for the easier it'll be to get anons to vote for your party. It also might be helpful to name/tripfag if you create a party. Here an example:
Party Party Not a real party as of now
Manifesto:
1. /mlpol/ is a fun board.
2. /mlpol/ is a nice board.
3. Being no fun will not be allowed. If you are not fun, you'll be BANNED!
4. If you’re a commie you’re not fun.
5. On Sunday you need to post horse pussy at least once or you’re not being fun.
Stance on issues is conservative center left. Distributism is good if effective. But destroying traditions is no fun!
Ect

As soon as we get two parties up and running the two parties will get one seat each seat and all parties that join will also get two seats. There is a 10-party cap so that we don't have a terribly large amount of anons making parties that are very similar.

After the parties are formed we can get to the meat of it which is anons voting. The votes here will work differently. Say which party you want to join and the party will be given an extra seat. Your vote can also be used to remove a seat from a political party. Everyone including party founders get three votes with their ID for max chaos. The game will continue till we reach 23, and as soon as its hit voting is over.

Once voting is over we can go full LARP and each party leader, or the person who made the party and wrote the manifesto, will chose anons who loyally voted for him to become members of parliament. Here we will draft legislation and make arbitrary rules based on the manifesto. All which will be non-binding unless, say the mods for whatever reason don't veto it when it leaves the lower house of parliament.

SO LET THE GAMES BEGIN!

491 replies and 136 files omitted.
States Rights Party
!CDhbRlFpIc
3pMsD
?
No.3230
3232
526FF2B7-2B05-47C4-95F9-FFAA01512FCE.jpeg
>>3229
>family member had heart attack
Is everything ok now? You said the chaos is settling down, but forgot to mention if the person is ok now. I hope the recovery is going smoothly.

I feel like a jerk now that I have to disagree with you on these points. Just don’t take it personally.

>two separate anons must vote to allow into general election
I might be the only anon interested in my party and thus will be kept from the voting. Of course I can’t support this, my party would be signing itself to irrelevance!

>parliament can give autonomy and take it away
Nice try! If the Confederacy has statehood, it can’t be recalled without bloodshed. Our right to be a conscience supporter of this endeavor with the ability to withdraw should certain (((corruption))) come to power shall not be limited, let alone removed!
Property and Freedom Party
!!IgxE6likhE
s16/b
?
No.3231
3232
NotanArgumentLeslieFaire.png
>>3228
>further explanation
Each of the six provinces would have semi-separate elections conducted simultaneously. Once concluded each province would have votes tallied for each candidate. The percentage would then be calculated by dividing the total: V/n. This proportion of seats then goes to the candidate from the region's total. Each party can have up to six candidates and with ten parties there can therefore be almost sixty anons directly involved in the election process (but twenty would be the ideal number for efficiency.

The idea of splitting party power among "candidates" across regions who each hold seats is to balance power. If the party president does something execrable then his affiliates can vote against him if they think it necessary. It is also less chaotic than simply assigning a vote to every anon.

Districts are aesthetic but provinces are less so. By splitting power concentration a party, rather than trying to win through sheer number of votes, could attempt to skim as many votes as possible across the map or seek dominance in a particular region. This system enabling strategy has more F.U.N. levels than a pure popularity contest.

>Single leadership not necessary
Someone still needs to keep the seat count accurate and update the pictures. We can debate on the official powers that are necessary; I consider the "call into order" necessary only when the Parliament cannot agree on what to debate (as does happen). Also, it is more convenient for everyone to have a handy list of proposals to vote for rather than respond to individual posts.

>>3229
>family member had heart attack
I hope your relative has a speedy recovery. I don't know if its worse to have sole responsibility over the person having a heart attack or to find out after the fact through correspondence with another family member.

>Revised platform
I agree only with self-designating one's post as a vote. Everything else is a solid NAY.
April First Party
!DZdi0rA1dg
1yRN/
?
No.3232
1496497678551.png
>>3230
>Is everything ok now?
Yep its everything is going well now.
>Of course I can’t support this, my party would be signing itself to irrelevance!
I doubt that two other anons wouldn't show interest in voting for a neo-confederacy party. This is moreover a safeguard against too many political parties or bad political parties entering into government.
>Confederacy has statehood, it can’t be recalled without bloodshed.
Unitary systems allow regions to have more autonomy including in legislatures but also must be given the ability to take it away if they so chose, otherwise its a federalized system which I'm 100% against and will not vote for. I also will not vote for any proposal that Starts with parliament having pre-planned districts or autonomous regions. If a region wants to become autonomous 1 they need to prove to us all that they are different enough from /mlpol/ in general that they deserve it, and 2 that it can somehow have its own elections separate from ours. But we must have the option to re-integrate them when they're culture begins to reflect that of our own again. This is where I'm willing to compromise if you wish to take a hardline stance on it then we'll have to wait on others to agree instead.
>>3231
>I agree only with self-designating one's post as a vote.
I'd honestly like having a seat filled by someone else if it seemed possible but at the moment it does not.
>Everything else is a solid NAY
Understandable.
Cult of Epona
!!cNtiy2GFsE
x/on7
?
No.3233
3234
>>3229
>I'd mainly agree with your ideas in practice but codifying them as such would seem a bit arbitrary would it not?
I don't think so since we don't practice them in reality, nor is the structure present. Nonetheless, you have shown interest, so I will back down and save the revised proposal for later. My concern is for 3 anon rule, and I suggest shortening it into 2. Otherwise, with leniency, I am giving your reform an AYE.
April First Party
!DZdi0rA1dg
1x6VQ
?
No.3234
>>3233
Done! Revised bill.

1. Voting can be called on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday by the governing coalition or plurality party.
2. In order for your vote to be counted you need to type V in the subject line.
3. Every anon will have 2 votes he can use to vote separately for a party and 1 against.
4. When an anon votes he must cast all his ballets at once or forfeit his ability to cast it for others later.
5. Unlimited amounts of parties can enter into the election but they must have 2 separate anons other then the party founder state that the party should be allowed into the general election.
6. Make the total number of seats in the parliament at 27 instead of 23.
7. Make the parliament a percentage proportional representation system.
8. Regions can vote for more autonomy and be given special status elections of their choice if parliament passes a law allowing such. But this can also be taken away. Parliament needs at least 2/3 of the legislature to give a region autonomy and 2/3 to have it taken away.
Property and Freedom Party
!!IgxE6likhE
+qGLF
?
No.3235
3236 3240
It has been over a week since Parliament has last been called into session. We still have two or three highly disparate electoral reform bills.

What are the opinions of the minor parties?
Anonymous
UAatD
?
No.3236
>>3235
Gas the kikes.
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3237
3238 3240 3246
Gleaming Shield Gift wrapped whore3.png
Sunset Horsefucker11.png
Poprocks - Scootaloo.png
I've been skimming over this thread, and I'm seeing a lot of good autism going on, but...

Where's my Horse Pucci Party?

>1. Ponies not infringed
>2. Suffer not the (((Shills))) to live.
>3. Defense budget spent on R&D for Horse Pucci grenades.

Who here best supports my values? I am a concerned citizen that glows in the dark.

Also:
>Clarify stances on race mixing. Are zebras a good fuck that should be sterilized, or do they get reproductive rights?
Cult of Epona
!!cNtiy2GFsE
x/on7
?
No.3238
3239 3240
>>3237
>horse pucci party
>no horse pussy posted in sight
>only anthro
Fake party.

I now claim de facto dictatorship.
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3239
3241 3245
Alles Guter.jpg
Bouncing Booty.gif
Annoyed dick boop anon filly.png
Cocoa panties2.png
Flick.png
>>3238
>No Horse Pucci
There's no need to drop McNukes when an assassination is fine.

Anonymous
1yRN/
?
No.3240
3242 3245 3248
>>3235
Yeah sorta just been waiting on the smaller parties. As soon as the motion passes by everyone approving the new measure or one of the ones currently up then we'll continue.
>>3238
>I now claim de facto dictatorship.
No!
>>3237
I'd vote for that.
Anonymous
K2Mwi
?
No.3241
>>3239
Did someone say McNukes?
spoon party
!lHlgiwKT9g
6Zvan
?
No.3242
3243 3248
>>3240
who hasn't voted
Anonymous
1yRN/
?
No.3243
3244
>>3242
Well I revised the old one so (you)
spoon party
!lHlgiwKT9g
6Zvan
?
No.3244
>>3243
if that is the case then i vote for property and freedoms party's reforms
Cult of Epona
!!cNtiy2GFsE
x/on7
?
No.3245
3247 3249
unknown.png
>>3240
The first step in obtaining rule is stamping out dissidents.
>>3239
That's three nukes for you every picture you post that doesn't show a proper horse pussy.
Anonymous
WFIgx
?
No.3246
3247
1513698917230-0.gif
>>3237
>no horsepussy
>anthro
>pic #1 is a foursome (degenerate and gay)
>pic #2 features an asshole as big around as your fist (just disgusting-looking)
>pic #3 is zebra domination of a minor (degenerate as all hell)

Alright, turn in your Horsefucker badge, now. You don't deserve to savor the horsepussy.
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3247
3275 3276
Lemming facts with Rockwell too.png
Actual love before I browse all this heathen shit.png
Aryanne for the emperor.jpg
Baking Cream Pies.jpg
Buzzing while you twerk.gif
>>3246
>Ignoring my second post
I save the good stuff for myself. The masses are generally degenerate lemmings. You won't be able to change their minds with Horse Pucci Propaganda.

Only the truly righteous can appreciate the real thing - a loving, caring relationship, and a life with purpose.

Besides
>>3245
>>3246
>Purity spirals
There's no need to kill degenerates until they harm society by trying to make the world like themselves. They will be purged when they start doing the whole "gay pride parade" thing.
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3248
Cock worship2.png
>>3240
Thank you for your support, citizen!

>>3242
I have not voted, however it appears the current seats have been filled. The Horse Pucci Party (HPP) will wait till the next election cycle to present its modest proposals for the advancement of the values we all hold dear:

1. Horse Pucci will not be infringed.
2. (((Shills))) get the rope/rake.
3. Studying better ways to expose people to our country, and identify the best immigrants possible (fishing R&D).
Anonymous
XL51w
?
No.3249
>>3245
>that pic
Hnnnnnnnnnng
Anonymous
NpVGo
?
No.3250
3251 3271
GET LOST YOU LYING FAG!!
I ALREADY WARNED YOU PIECE OF SHIT MOD!

YOU CANNOT BAN ME YOU LYING FAGGOT!!

I AM GOING TO KEEP YOU TIED-UP ALL NIGHT REGRETTING YOUR LIES YOU PIECE OF SHIT!!

ha ha ha ha ha I win again!

USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3251
3252 3258 3271
Castration fetish ow.png
>>3250
Oh look, an internet badass over here...

Wrong thread to boot!
Anonymous
mqqRE
?
No.3252
3253 3255
5DD1D090-3C32-4780-99F3-5C352499B0DE.gif
>>3251
Do you know where to find the pic I need to see it ?
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3253
3255
Screaming in traumatized.png
>>3252
That's the only evidence I have of its existence. I was not in the thread. The most terrifying part...

>3/5
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3254
3271
A Job Well Done.png
>>124626
Get fucked outsider. You're payment has been deposited in the usual way.
Anonymous
uj04M
?
No.3255
3256 3257 3259 3271
Spoilered
>>3252
>>3253
Found The image. It is as bad, if not worse than your wildest imaginings.
Anonymous
XL51w
?
No.3256
3258 3259
>>3255
Translation?
Anonymous
wm+C4
?
No.3257
>>3255
Meh, not as bad as that screencap hyped up.
There's not even blood in the pic.
3/10.
Anonymous
uj04M
?
No.3258
3260
>>3256
See >>3251

Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3259
Gouging out my eyes.png
>>3255
You are a stronger anon than I.
>>3256
"Sweetie, be patient a little longer. I am almost finished."

At least, that's from the other picture.
Anonymous
XL51w
?
No.3260
3261
>>3258
Poor shining armor. i bet a kike drew that.
Anonymous
wm+C4
?
No.3261
3262 3263 3264
>>3260
He didn't do a good job with the pic.
Now, if the hook was going through the balls, and there was blood spurting everywhere, it would be a good gore image.
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3262
3264
>>3261
Again...

>3/5
There are more pictures out there.
Anonymous
XL51w
?
No.3263
>>3261
Yea but shining is a white horse though. And yea the gore could be better.
Anonymous
uj04M
?
No.3264
3265 3266 3271
1433261956316.jpg
1448855582088.png
1448855781474.png
1448523090662.jpg
>>3261
>>3262
The thread is less gore and more cringe. Here are the rest of his images the anon posted.
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3265
>>3264
Ah. Considering the material, I was expecting White Kitten.
Anonymous
wm+C4
?
No.3266
3267 3268 3269 3270 3271
Spoilered
>>3264
That anon did not know what true cringe is.
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3267
A sign to stop.png
>>3266
Stop. We are getting off topic. This is parliament thread.
Anonymous
uj04M
?
No.3268
I Cringed.gif
>>3266
I felt that in my eye when I saw that. Holy shit.
Anonymous
XL51w
?
No.3269
>>3266
Damn that looks like it hurts.
TSDWHP
!!xkNBCnfiY2
q9s//
?
No.3270
3271
>>3266
*checks scout manual
"In case of a person being pierced by a fishing hook, push the hook through the skin, snip off the barb, then retract the remainder of the hook through the entrance wound"
Yer fucked mate.
Property and Freedom Party
!!IgxE6likhE
20iMw
?
No.3271
3272 3273
NervousSweatyTwilight.png
>>3250
>>3251
>>3254
>>3255
>>3264
>>3266
As much as I love anarchy this is the wrong thread for that. If you're going to have such pictures please have a parliament building as the setting or background.

>>3270
You'd better hope his mate is capable at eye surgery in the field.
TSDWHP
!!xkNBCnfiY2
q9s//
?
No.3272
>>3271
honestly that's the sort of injury that warrants exfiltration, the eye is a very sensitive and valuable organ.
Anonymous
wm+C4
?
No.3273
3274
Spoilered
>>3271
>If you're going to have such pictures please have a parliament building as the setting or background.

Anonymous
WFIgx
?
No.3274
>>3273
Somehow, that still doesn't make it any better.
Anonymous
x/on7
?
No.3275
3277
1474424236242.png
>>3247
>this entire post
What? Not only is the logic circular, it's downright contradictory.
Anonymous
s70p1
?
No.3276
3277
>>3247
>creates a Horse Pucci Party
>doesn't post horsepussy
>"I save the good stuff for myself."

Anon, your second post does nothing to refute what you posted.
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3277
3278
Like what you see.png
>>3275
>>3276

Horse Pucci is meant to:
1. Drive away shills
2. Attract the attention of mods, like T-cells for White blood cells

>Doesn't post horsepucci
I corrected that in the second post to show that I do in fact have it. It's kind of a given for this board.

I guess in the future I'll just post pure stuff to keep you happy. I apologize if somehow the message got lost because you weren't face deep in ass pie.

>Circular logic
How so? Degeneracy doesn't really matter until it metestasizes. Until that point it is benign. Benign tumors are still good to remove, but unless they become aggressive, there is no real threat, and it's just cosmetic surgery.

In other words, leave the anthro alone. It's not that big of a deal.
Anonymous
x/on7
?
No.3278
3279
Spoilered
>>3277
>Benign tumors are still good to remove, but unless they become aggressive, there is no real threat, and it's just cosmetic surgery.
Fuck you. My father had benign tumours near his spine, and had crippling back pain until surgery, then some more a year plus a half after that. Your comparison not only falls out of your favour, but strengthens my position because of first hand experience with that shit. You think that bullshit can save you?
I find it funny that you would paint the "masses {as} generally degenerate lemmings", yet post anthro, upload zebra cuck porn, even pose the question if zebras should get reproductive rights (they shouldn't be allowed in the country!), and even defend degeneracy to an extent as long as it didn't cause harm. Actually, I never even see this type of degeneracy even in the porn thread! Almost as though you are the degenerate. No everyone else, nor a significantly broad portion. Anyways, at the time of my response to the initial post, you had continued to deny any wrongdoing posting anthro. Until now you dismissed it with sly remarks, which I still hold you to fault even if you did later do right on your part.
Also, you fail to understand my criticism. It's simple:
>you posted anthro under the horsepucci name
>false advertising
>deflection
Go ahead and like bad porn all you like, you can have shit taste. It's not an issue to me, but using the defence of degeneracy gets you into a sticky situation. The mention itself is irrelevant. You tried to pull it off though by circular reasoning by; calling the masses degenerate as an insult, defending degeneracy, then saying that anthro is okay because degeneracy is okay more or less. Degeneracy by definition is harmful; as degeneration of order. Like a slippery slope (gays for example being the causation of gay pride parades.) This line of thinking contradicts itself as I said.
Anonymous
OX/NB
?
No.3279
Aces for Ponytown.png
>>3278
Well, first off:
>Definition of benign: (of a disease) not harmful in effect.
>Benign tumors are still good to remove

Clearly, if a tumor is being harmful, it is not benign, and should be removed. I'm not advocating keeping around aggressive or abrasive cultures. By and large, most are - being an asshole tends to keep you alive when surrounded by assholes. That is just how survival works. However, hunting down every last degenerate faggot is pointless. Being able to state the goals, aims, and ideals of the society is far more important - this way, society at large can identify 'bad' behavior and self-police.

>Reproductive rights =/= race mixing
There's a difference between allowing a people to exist and have their own children vs. sterilizing them and genociding them. Sure, if that's the way you want to go, that's fine, just don't be surprised when you run into resistance. Even if you just want to kick people out into a different country, have fun trying to explain that to the poor country you are pushing them into. They just might arm those 'refugees,' and you'll create a bigger fucking problem. Better to think of something that suppresses a people without killing them...like porn.

>Lemmings
>Defending degeneracy
Most people ARE lemmings/normies/whatever you want to call them. They do degenerate things. Killing them all pulls you into a purity spiral, wherein there is no society left to protect. You will have killed them all. If you want fascism to work, you can't do that - you have to treat those degenerates like family. Would you kill your brother for being a fag? No. You would talk him out of it, knock any ideas of cutting his dick off out of his head, and in general just try to teach and show true compassion for his well being. If your brother just can't knock it off with the faggotry then you get him to do that shit on the down low, and not as a flaming disgrace to the family.

Allowing degeneracy to exist =/= Defending degeneracy. Degenerate things exist. Society should be against those degenerate things. That doesn't mean you burn everyone at the stake for it. America tried that with prohibition, and it didn't work.

>Slippery slope
Sure. Degeneracy IS harmful. You going to kill everyone at the top of the cliff? You will not only kill everyone around you, chances are good you will have to kill yourself eventually. No one is perfect.

Not even God prevented degeneracy completely - He just lets people live with the consequences of their actions (diseases, suffering, relationship problems, etc.).

>Go ahead and like bad porn all you like, you can have shit taste
That's basically the attitude you have to have towards degeneracy, or you're going to go to some very, very dark places.