>>252874>Why don’t you just wait [for the election] amounts to saying: “Why don’t you just let him [Trump] cheat in one more election?” - Schiffhttps://twitter.com/keithboykin/status/1204406976081530880https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/10/adam-schiff-congress-must-impeach-trump-to-stop-him-in-2020/
Basically, if they don't impeach the
internet informed people will vote for Trump again. Therefore to stop Trump "cheating" and winning he must be impeached.
Perfectly logical….. in a democracy.
If they succeed what are the chances of a civil war?
I would like to share a testimony to Marty:
I am french and have attended a conference of technology in Germany last weekend, in which Barack Obama attended as a guest speaker.
Though I am not American nor Republican, I was really surprised by the tonality and the comments different American speakers voiced during the speeches about Republicans and Donald Trump : uneducated, in denial, egocentric, dumb,… a speaker even said she regretted not having offered a “Dump Trump” sweater to President Obama (quote). I was really surprised to see the level of undisclosed hatred being displayed in a business/public event..
You are absolutely right, the gloves are dropped now, and 2020 will be hectic in the USA…
Thanks a million for your blog and your insights, you are a true teacher to me
REPLY: I have never seen a worse political divide. There is no going back. The 2020 election is going to be the most violent and nasty election in American history. There is just no way to return to civility. The hatred is brewing and that will erupt into violence.
From my study of history, it appears that this is just part of the cycle in how empires, nations, & city-states collapse. The very purpose of civilization is that there emerges a synergy that is greater than an individual can create alone. You no longer need to bake bread because someone started a bakery.
However, when society turns in upon itself, that is the end. It is no longer beneficial to remain in a collective group. We are rapidly approaching this point and that erupts into separatism, which you are witnessing everywhere around the globe.
If the democrats win their far left base will be embolden and probably start acting even more like the moral police and violently attack people they disagree with. Anyone caught outside with a Trump hat will be open season on in leftist areas. This will lead to two scenarios. Moderates and republicans will move away from the leftist states and into safe areas. In one of the stand your ground states a derange leftist will try to attack a concealed carry person wearing a Trump hat and get shot in the process. This is the point where it becomes murky on what will happen next, but it could be the spark that starts the war. More likely it will just lead to more attacks on moderates in leftist areas which will increase the movement of people away from those areas.
If Trump wins I guess more or less the same will happen, except the far left will not be embolden they will be vindictive. This might just make the process above happen at a faster pace.
The big win in next election is not the Presidency it is replacing RGB in the SCOTUS.
Civil war will not come easy to the US regardless of the 2020 outcome, you will see individual states resisting the federal government like we've been seeing for the past four years from many blue states. If the democrats win, and that's a long shot at best, you'll see that federal resistance flip to the red states. While republicans are far more tolerating of blue states flying in the face of the federal administration, the democrats won't be so graceful, they're likely to use heavy handed enforcement on disobedient red states.
Whether the left wing voting base will fire the first shots of a civil war after Trump's re-election is doubtful. While they talk a big game about purging right wingers, it's the talk of people who want others to go first. They follow trends, they don't start them. Expect four more years of "peaceful" "protests", blue states being retarded and lots of comments gloating that it'll be good to "get back on track" after Trump's term is up.
I don't believe that the Boogaloo can happen until someone manages to detonate a nuke somewhere and kick off WWIII. That should demolish the bread and circuses that keep people too comfortable and complacent to do anything.
I think you underestimate how close to the brink America is. There's an economic collapse coming that's going to push places like Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit… the whole fucking state of California… into bankruptcy. Not economic hardship, insolvency. Once the gibs are turned off the real fireworks will begin. And it won't be blacks lighting the fuse.
Take for example Chicago. It has murder rate of 18.5/100,000. That's unprecedented in the first world but actually pretty low for a major American city. Baltimore, St Louis and Detroit all have murder rates well into 50+/100,000. Murder rates comparable to Central America, where the governments have collapsed and cartels are the dominant political power. You know why the similar murder rates? Because in those places the governments have collapsed and cartels are the dominant political power.
I'll let those crazy right wingers at the wikipedia explain:>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago#Crime>According to reports in 2013, "most of Chicago's violent crime comes from gangs trying to maintain control of drug-selling territories", and is specifically related to the activities of the Sinaloa Cartel, which is active in several American cities.
The Sinaloa cartel and their offshoot MS-13:>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-13>This cruelty of the distinguished members of the "Maras" or "Mareros" earned them a path to be recruited by the Sinaloa Cartel battling against Los Zetas in an ongoing drug war in Mexico. Their wide-ranging activities have drawn the attention of the FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, who have initiated wide-scale raids against known and suspected gang members, arresting hundreds across the United States. In an interview with Bill Ritter in late 2017, Nassau County, New York District Attorney Madeline Singas, referring to crimes committed by MS-13 gang members, stated: "The crimes that we're talking about are brutal. Their weapon of choice is a machete. We end up seeing people with injuries that I've never seen before. You know, limbs hacked off. And that's what the bodies look like that we're recovering. So they're brutal. They're ruthless, and we're gonna be relentless in our attacks against them." The choice of a machete is in contrast to other gangs, which prefer to use guns.
That doesn't begin to encapsulate the problem in Chicago. The turf MS-13 is defending is being encroached upon by a black gang and an *Islamic* gang. This dynamic is playing out in virtually every major city east of the Mississippi and a good share of the ones west. 66% of _all_ immigrant families are on federal or state assistance, when you select for new arrivals that number is trending near 100%. When the gibs are turned off all those able-bodied men we saw in the caravans will activate with the cartels and major American cities will… become… bloodbaths.
Depending on how bad the collapse is in January this could play out as early as March/April. It will definitely happen in the next five years. Are you prepared?
This comment will get slid within minutes of me posting it.
>>252875>what are the chances of a civil war?
Zero lol. Masses are ready to swallow every shit that elites gonna give them. There are almost zero resistance to federal invasion into every part of society, why would some small political crap change something?
Oh yeah maybe except the next big crisis that can make things more interesting.
>>252921>You know why the similar murder rates? Because in those places the governments have collapsed and cartels are the dominant political power
I was gonna say that they have too many niggers.
>Depending on how bad the collapse is in January this could play out as early as March/April. It will definitely happen in the next five years. Are you prepared?
More prepared than most, but I don't see the gibs being cut off so long as the situation is calm enough for the fed to keep pulling money out of thin air to support their interests. Those cities are their centers of Power, so they'll keep the gibs flowing no matter what.
>this comment will be slid in five minutes
This is mlpol, not 4pol. You'll have to wait awhile for the thread to 404. And I've only ever seen the mods cull posts that were literal bomb making instructions for liability reasons.
>>252929>Nothing has changed at all. Nobody is getting sick of the shit that's been going on. Not anyone at all. There are somehow no sings of rising unrest anywhere.
How's life in your sucky alternate dimension?>Russian flag commenting on the state of the US populace.
If that's not a VPN, you're a retard. If it is one, you're just being overly pessimistic.
Here's a pony to help cheer you up.
>>252929>Masses are ready to swallow every shit that elites gonna give them. There are almost zero resistance to federal invasion into every part of society
How can one man be this deep in the memory hole?
>>252929>Masses are ready to swallow every shit that elites gonna give them.
Reality on the field begs to differ.
The introduction of restrictions on free exchange of ideas (censorship) is a direct reaction to the redpill spreading to a explosive rate.
The western establishment is panicking, they know that if the narrative is not regained, revolution is unavoidable.
I beg you, raise his spirits and show him a reason to smile.
>>252921>This comment will get slid within minutes of me posting it.>posted 12 hours ago
>>252921>This comment will get slid within minutes of me posting it
Lurk moar newfag
In all seriousness, I agree with this anon. I think an actual shooting war breaking out in the US is pretty unlikely, barring any unforeseen cataclysm like a nuke or a total economic collapse as others have suggested, but those events in themselves I actually consider fairly unlikely.
I personally think the civil war has already basically kicked off, it's just not a military conflict this time. My prediction for the foreseeable future is that the Federal government is going to become increasingly gridlocked and ineffective as the parties become increasingly polarized. Local governments begin to function more autonomously, obeying whichever Federal edicts they agree with and disregarding those they don't. It's already happening with sanctuary cities in blue areas and disregard of gun control efforts in red areas. You can't even really break it down into red states and blue states anymore because the conflict is more urban centers and their suburbs versus exurban/rural areas.
The way our system works, it's very difficult for one party to gain control over all levers of Federal power, as they would need to control the Presidency, both houses of Congress, and the Judiciary. What's more likely to happen is that we're always going to have a split government like we have currently (and had through the Obama administration as well), where one party is more or less in control but the other party has enough power to throw roadblocks. The opposition party rallies its base while out of power, and usually creates a surge that allows them to take control the next time around. They have enough time to do some damage to the other side's agenda, but nothing with enough permanence to make their power last beyond when the tide turns against them. This is part of the design of the American system and it's always basically worked this way, but when the two parties are as ideologically polarized as they are right now it creates a lot of dysfunction. As I said above, what will probably happen is the Federal government will become increasingly more paralyzed and ineffective, and you will have local areas ignoring Federal edicts and behaving more and more like autonomous entities. The two sides will just stop actively engaging with each other and trying to convince each other and just focus on undermining each other, in fact they basically already have.
Where it goes from there, I really couldn't tell you. Maybe a shooting war will be the inevitable result after all, but I'm rather hoping people on both sides begin to see that it's to our mutual benefit to just break up the band and start two distinct countries. The Left takes the West Coast and New England, the Right takes the interior and the South. Maybe maintain something along the lines of the original Articles of Confederation where we agree to band together in the event of an invasion or world war. Who knows though. I'm honestly done trying to make long-term predictions because things seem to change pretty fast these days.
Today's House Judiciary Committee Debates on Articles of Impeachment, and voting on whether or not to impeach if I recall correctly.https://youtu.be/IRy5J9T4Ocs
West Virginia, Washington, Colorado, New Jersey, Connecticut, Oregon, South Carolina, Jewtah, Nevada, Tennessee: all have or are right now seeking Red Flag firearm confiscation (((laws))). As it stands the non-confederated government has been paralyzed by trying to recreate a unified two-party, zero independent government, barring the CIA with help from MI5/6 or Mossad and "friends", since the restart of the the Afghanistan Drug War pre-2000. A second civil war would not solve the sheer number of kikes in leading positions. What it would do is incentivize the common goy cattle to fight for one ZOG or the other, better ZOG. At current the "battle lines" between the so-called secular kikes such as Soros, Goldstein, Epstein, Warburgs, against the "peaceful appropriationist" kikes such as that cuck Trump's wife, NetanYAHOO, and the Rothschilds are losing the propaganda war from independent, uncontrolled movements.
Anyone showing middle ground or outside information that isn't jude or judeo-xtian controlled opposition approved is the "enemy". That is the real danger.
>Impeachment Ringleaders Quietly Panic As Moderate Democrats Bail
>House Democratic leaders are quietly panicking over rumors that 'more than two' Democrats will bail on impeaching President Trump, according to the Washington Post, citing 'multiple officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly.' The paper described House Leader Nancy Pelosi's anguish over defections as as "quiet hand-wringing."
>According to the report, "several moderates have privately pined for other options," primarily censure. Others have considered "splitting the baby," a popular procedure among Democrats, in which they would back one of the two articles of impeachment but not the other.
>"I’m still thinking it over," said one such Democrat, Rep. Susie Lee of Nevada. "This is a very grave decision. . . . I’m hearing all sides of it. . . . It’s mixed, it’s very mixed."
>"As soon as they’re formally adopted, I’ll make a decision," said New Jersey Democrat Josh Gottheimer, another centrist Democrat who attended a Monday night meeting of moderate Democrats who expressed their misgivings about impeachment. "I’ve said all along, I need to see all the facts. I’m not going to prejudge anything until we get every bit of information."https://www.zerohedge.com/political/impeachment-ringleaders-quietly-panic-moderate-democrats-bail
Can't anybody stop Russia?~?!?~?~@?~??
Defending the government just gets tougher everyday.
Surprising no one, the Judiciary committee passed the 2 articles of impeachment, and the vote goes before the house next week
How can Americans sleep at night while the USA is collapsing?
Soros, Obama, Clinton, and Trump all support endless wars, debt, and tyranny. What's the difference?
Has Trump opposed trade wars, wars with Iraq, Syria, Niger, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan, Venezuela, Iran, Mexico, China, Russia, and North Korea, driving up the debt, abortion, homosexuality, ending minimum wages, opening concentration camps, banning free speech, religious freedom, freedom from warrantless searches, freedom from torture, security cameras, license plate readers, checkpoints, redlight cameras, speed cameras, FBI facial and voice recognition, curfews, gun bans, NSA wiretapping, the end to the right to silence, searches without warrants, private prisons, mandatory minimums, 3 strikes laws, DNA databases, CISPA, SOPA, IMBRA, private prison quotas, no knock raids, take down notices, no fly lists, terror watch lists, Constitution free zones, stop and frisk, 3 strikes laws, kill switches, National Security Letters, DNA databases, kill lists, FBAR, FATCA, Operation Chokepoint, TSA groping, civil forfeiture, CIA torture, NDAA indefinite detention, secret FISA courts, FEMA camps, laws requiring passports for domestic travel, IRS laws denying passports for tax debts, gun and ammo stockpiles, laws outlawing protesting, police militarization, and Jade Helm?
Has Trump arrested the bankers, decreased taxes, kicked out the illegal aliens, ended the Fed, ended the wars, ended welfare, ended Obamacare, and restored the Bill of Rights?
Trump doesn't work for you. He works for the elites.
The time for supporting Trump has ended and the time for buying gold, guns, and food has arrived.
Wake up. Think. Spread the word. Dark times are coming.
>>252882>think they will win
Anon, why do you think their masters give a fuck if their slaves win or lose? The kikes simply move on when they wreck a nation. Their objective is to see it demolished, instead of being strong and free of their parasitism.
>>253133>oy vey, trump makes endless wars!
Considering we're pulling out of everywhere and charging other nations for our troops being stationed on their land… you're full of shit, shillkun.
Are the shadow wars actually ending though? Considering their nature, it's much harder to find info, but I believe we're still embroiled in Yemen, Somalia…
I don't doubt that trump will win, but citing polls is hilariously retarded.
But I thought statistics were everything, never wrong/misleading, and 100% accurate and certifiable! Isn't that what we learned from 2016??
This is from "sports betting" companies not MSM.
I see. I completely and totally retract any and all sarcasm, and apologize most sincerely for not appreciating your valid, scholarly, and totally not premature in any way (not to mention time-relevant specific to now) source.
>Rep. Jeff Van Drew, anti-impeachment Democrat, expected to switch parties after Trump meeting
>Officials said Saturday that Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, a vocally anti-impeachment Democrat, will join the Republican Party in the coming days — delivering a political jolt to Democrats ahead of next week’s expected vote to impeach the president. >The decision, they said, came after Van Drew joined President Trump for a lengthy Friday meeting, during which Trump urged him to join the GOP. >Three Democratic officials familiar with Van Drew’s discussions in recent days said that he has decided to switch parties; two said that his staff was informed of his decision Saturday. The White House meeting was confirmed by a Trump administration official and one of the Democratic officials.
>Van Drew, who won a previously Republican seat in 2018, has been a critical voice opposing impeachment inside the Democratic ranks, saying that the process is too divisive and comes too close to the 2020 presidential election to be worth pursuing. A member of the centrist Blue Dog Coalition, Van Drew has positioned himself at the rightmost flank of his party, though he has generally voted in line with the leadership on major bills. >Van Drew and Rep. Collin C. Peterson, a veteran Minnesota lawmaker who represents a much more conservative district than Van Drew’s, were the only two Democrats to vote against a House resolution in October formalizing the impeachment inquiry. >Van Drew’s decision to oppose impeachment — and his willingness to proclaim his views on the GOP-friendly Fox News Channel — badly alienated Democratic voters in his district, sparking a primary challenge that threatened his prospects for reelection. Brigid Callahan Harrison, a Montclair State University political science professor, signaled last month that she is likely to run for the Democratic nomination. https://web.archive.org/web/20191214234433/https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rep-jeff-van-drew-anti-impeachment-democrat-expected-to-switch-parties-after-trump-meeting/ar-AAK7Suv?ocid=spartannt
>>253167>Rep. Jeff Van Drew, anti-impeachment Democrat, expected to switch parties after Trump meeting
Like rats abandoning a sinking ship.
>Judiciary Committee impeachment report alleges Trump committed 'multiple federal crimes'
>President Donald Trump committed criminal bribery and wire fraud, the House Judiciary Committee alleges in a report that will accompany articles of impeachment this week.
>The committee contends that Trump’s actions were part of a pattern than began with his “welcoming” of Russian interference in the 2016 election, and continues to this day. In fact, the panel’s Democrats cite his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s trip to Ukraine just last week as evidence that Trump intends to continue the alleged scheme. Trump’s lack of remorse over the Ukraine allegations, Democrats claim, is evidence that he poses a “continuing threat if left in office.”>“President Trump has made it clear that he believes he is free to use his presidential powers the same way, to the same ends, whenever and wherever he pleases,” the report states.>The panel’s report, which comes on the heels of a House Intelligence Committee-led investigation that formed the basis of the articles of impeachment, contends that Trump’s most acute abuse of his power occurred during a July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, when Trump asked his counterpart to launch investigations targeting former Vice President Joe Biden and other Democrats.
>The report also notes that Trump ordered a freeze of $391 million in military aid to Ukraine over the objections of advisers at the State Department, Pentagon and National Security Council, which he only lifted after Democrats began investigating the matter.>Democrats argue that Trump crossed the threshold into criminal behavior with his posture toward Zelensky, writing in the report that his request for the announcement of politically motivated investigations constituted the solicitation of a bribe under federal law.>The committee also alleges that Trump violated the honest services wire fraud statute during the July 25 phone call, as well as during a separate phone call a day later with Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union. Those “foreign wire communications” were done “in furtherance of an ongoing bribery scheme,” according to the report.
>In an accompanying 18-page dissent, Judiciary Committee Republicans, led by Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), assail Democrats’ evidence as “paltry” and an “affront to the constitutional process of impeachment.”>“If President Nixon’s impeachment proceedings are the ‘gold standard’ for presidential impeachment inquiries, these proceedings, in stark contrast, will go down in history as the quintessential example of how such proceedings should not be conducted,” Collins writes. >Collins rejects Democrats’ articles of impeachment as “vague,” “hyperbolic” and “misleading,” particularly as they describe fear of future presidential misconduct. He also blasts Democrats for declining to offer any articles of impeachment that specifically allege criminal violations.
>Among Democrats’ other conclusions was a contention that waiting for the federal courts to resolve fights with the White House over witnesses and documents — as Collins urged — would be “unnecessary and impractical.” Rather, they argue, Trump has abused the court process to delay Democrats’ impeachment proceedings, and waiting for a judicial ruling would render the House “subservient” to courts in a process meant to be entirely controlled by Congress.>“[T]he House has never before relied on litigation to compel witness testimony or the production of documents in a presidential impeachment proceeding,” the committee concludes. “Some members of the minority have suggested otherwise, but there is no law or practice to support such a theory.”>The committee’s report also marks a return of sorts for the evidence unearthed by special counsel Robert Mueller. Democrats claim the Ukraine allegations against Trump are part of a “pattern” of misconduct that began with Trump’s alleged solicitation of Russian assistance in the 2016 election — a matter probed by Mueller for nearly two years. Mueller also found that Trump made multiple attempts to hinder or end his investigation.>“The pattern is as unmistakable as it is unnerving,” the Judiciary Committee argues.http://archive.is/uWzMi
Trump may have an ace up his sleeve.
Read 3667-3689: https://qmap.pub/
The implication is that the Q-posting and John Durham started at the same time. And that Durham's report is the hammer. The IG report is said to only cover FBI/DOJ. Durham is said to cover what happened outside of that, presumably what the Five Eyes spooks did to help.
>Month/day 'Durham' initiated?>Month/day 'Q' public campaign initiated? >How many coincidences before mathematically impossible? >It was over before it began. [This is Sun Tzu strategy.]>Q
>John Henry Durham (born 1950) has been the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut since February 2018. Durham had been an Assistant U.S. Attorney in various positions in the District of Connecticut for 35 years. He is known for leading an inquiry into allegations that FBI agents and Boston police had ties with the mob, and his role as special prosecutor in the 2005 CIA interrogation tapes destruction. In May 2019, U.S. Attorney General William Barr tasked Durham with overseeing a review of the origins of the Russia investigation and to determine if intelligence collection involving the Trump campaign was "lawful and appropriate". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Durham_(lawyer)
Another coincidence is Q posting a watch showing the time 1:29:
>We have three things issued at 1:29 aka Q-watch time:>IG report>Durham rebuttal>Barr rebuttal
Way to much for me to cover and organise so go look for yourselves.
I am so looking forward to the sealed indictments being released to the public and enforced.
Exactly, the real names are for everypony's guess. They might be latino gang members as well as Food Stamp fraudsters.
The US is getting worse by the day.
Americans either don't know or want to know the USA is collapsing or think that nothing can be done.
Some Americans say that they will revolt when the Internet is shut down, guns are confiscated, the Communists are elected, the Ponzi economy crashes, or concentration camps open, but what if Americans never revolt?
The Soviets and Cambodians never revolted. The Chinese, North Koreans, Vietnamese, and Cubans are not resisting tyranny.
If Americans are going to resist then they would be out in the streets with pitchforks and torches right now because all of the lines have been crossed.
Racists are also hopeless because white people used to be taught to be moral, hard-working, independent, and love freedom. Now Americans are told to be immoral, lazy, dependent, and embrace tyranny. An environment like this is heaven for negroes and hopeless for white people. No wonder white people no longer have kids anymore.
Maybe the only bright side is the fact that white people can survive as a minority in South Africa, white people were outnumbered in North America in 1492, and Jews managed to take over the world despite being vastly outnumbered.
Maybe the best response to the US collapse for concerned Americans is to dropout, go off the grid, stop paying taxes, leave the USA, buy a sailboat, and buy guns, gold, and food, and pass the word.(staff note: this poster is a spambot. Posts are always in this style and are confirmed pasta, always posts with no flag. When you see posts in this style, please do not engage.)
The reason people are not revolting, said the occasional chimpout from the left, is because there is no big cause to rally behind. The way to introduce tyranny is in small incremental steps.
But I've always been the believer that we accept a lot and play along until we do an 180 and introduce final solutions. We are the Prince Rupert's Drops of humanity. We take a hell of a lot of beating, but if someone break the wrong spot we instantly react in fury.
Also the reason people don't revolt in the streets is because they know if shit hits the fan the rural areas will be safe areas for them. You don't wage a war in cities if you can avoid it. You take to the wilderness and force the enemy to venture outside their comfort zones. Sieging a city is child's play compared to sieging a patch of wilderness. Granted the party that controls a city will be fairly safe inside that city if they manage to keep supplies coming. But a few days with no supplies into the largest cities will spell their doom. Once food becomes a scarcity you know chimpouts will ensue and they will destroy themselves from within.
If there is a mass confiscation, so called buy back, put into effect you know they will not be able to take all at once. I think the majority, that own firearms, will oppose giving away their firearms and once police is sent out you know there will be some big standoffs Waco style down the line. And since it will be standoffs with groups that are not reclusive but have lots of people who can relate it will not go down as "quietly" as Waco.
tj;dr; if they break the tail the body will react and nothing will be able to stop it (read text for context)
House Rules Committee, in expected marathon session, begins setting terms for tomorrow's impeachment vote.https://youtu.be/EgBC-OryJ2I
But anon! Cutting off supply lines to civilian population centers is a WAR CRIME! Doing that is how you cause epidemics of Typhus!
Q doubles down on sealed indictments. We've seen the arrest promise before.
>First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening. >First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction.>They will fight but you are ready.>Marker .>Qhttps://qmap.pub/
Are we ready?
>>253348>Are we ready?
Oh yes. Let the fun begin.
I loved it when, I think it was, Rep. Dug Collins said (paraphrasing) "One good thing that has come out of this impeachment is that we now know who they are" (referring to the deep state).
Thanks for the vids.
Apologies, I'm only catching up.
Am I to assume that the house voted to push both articles and Pelosi is considering not
putting it through to the senate?
That is about the gist of it.
Pelosi says she won't send the impeachment to the Senate before she has signed off on how the Senate is choosing to conduct the trial. Basically Pelosi is trying to make the House the only branch in government, and dictate how and what the Senate, Judicial and Executive branch is allowed to do.
Pelosi is the absolute worst kind of politician, but she's not stupid. She knows this has no chance, and she knows that the longer it goes on the more energy it saps from the 2020 race. By now she probably knows that their chances of winning are fairly slim anyway. Ironically if the Dems had fallen in line under her leadership like the Republicans eventually did with Trump, they probably would have been able to do more damage to him, but the hard left doesn't trust her, because she's basically been using them for votes but keeping them on a leash. She's the kind of socialist who wants the rich people to still be in charge. So the far left screwballs took over and pushed for this stupid impeachment, which might have been able to remove Trump if they'd had an actual case and hadn't spent the entire span of time since the election making it clear that they were going to try to impeach him with or without a reason. They ran through pretty much all of their options and finally settled on this Ukraine thing, which was even dumber than the Russia thing, which was pretty dumb to begin with. At this point they've done nothing except humiliate themselves in front of the swing voters they need to win over to their side if they want to win in 2020, and on top of that they've been taking screen time away from their candidates in order to do it. Pelosi has to be facepalming herself into oblivion, I'm surprised she can look anyone in the eye at this point.
>>253426>Pelosi has to be facepalming herself into oblivion, I'm surprised she can look anyone in the eye at this point.
Daily reminder that politicians are proxies for the Jews and do as told.
The faction controlling Pelosi surely has a plan and wouldn't be crazy to speculate that some republican senators may be flipped.
What if the Jew's plan is>get the country to support Trump>"Liberalism is dead, all hail the free market! Less trade restrictions!">"Oy vey, it's just a coincidence that only the trade restrictions Jews don't like are being removed!">"Oy vey, fuck those Communists and Radical Islamists and their shared hatred of Israel! If you don't love Israel you're a commie!">"Oy vey, shut up Whitey! Can't you see that you're (((winning))) now that Trump is in power? calm down please dont holocaust me"
>>253426>She knows this has no chance, and she knows that the longer it goes on the more energy it saps from the 2020 race.
I don't think this will sap any energy except from Democrats (which might be what you meant). All Mitch McConnell has to do is to say he won't start any process to set up any rules before he the impeachment is handed over to the Senate. He can set up all the committees that are necessary, but the committees won't do any work until they have the impeachment documents handed over to them. This will basically table the impeachment, but the radical left will not stop reeeeing and demand Trump is removed. Because no matter how many times Pelosi is going to state "Trump is Impeached" I think the radical left know it means nothing. And every time Pelosi say "Trump is Impeached" the question will be "Then why haven't to sent it to the senate for a trial?" And no matter what Pelosi answers the counter is "We are still waiting for Pelosi to hand over the impeachment to us before we can start processing it."
MLPOL may be the only bastion in existence to which conversations can go unhindered by those that wish to shut it down.
Albeit I don't know everything to which will happen, I can only speculate to which I see and which I have saw before. To which occured today in the House against Donald J Trump is no more than a coup de'eta against the other political party in office, it won't end with Trump.
The greatest fear the fore founders of the United States of America had was to ever a leader would become a king, for it was by the hand of the King's tyranny that brought America to the brink of war, and through that tyranny to which war was fought. Even George Washington feared to become president for he knew he didn't want to be a king. For this reason, we elected for three bodies of governance to which to govern the people so no one body can have absolute control. What was not foreseen was when those three become one.
A King is a single person with absolute power, but what then when the body of people all become a single entity? The Democratic Party in America has become radicalized with the far left, unhinged, they are swept by Communist propaganda, ideology and all move to the same beat of the drum. They don't deter from this, not even remotely. This is a hive mind, and the collective is one.
This collective has infiltrated every branch of government, the Congress, Executive (WH,CIA,FBI,NSA,Etc.) and The Courts. They have become one and seek absolute power.
The Impeachment is only to validate themselves as they see that the election illegitimate. They believe that the right to the office belongs to Hillary and Hillary alone. They want her to lead them. To do so will be to remove all the others in their way. Trump will be removed and Pence along with many Senators for "obstruction" or some other frivolous charges as they will claim something to be "unfair". They will fabricate lies and stories with no merit and try to shoehorn their swift removals.
The Third in line after Pence is Nancy Pelocy, The Speaker of the House. She will seek to claim power and hold the mantle, but temporarily, then pass that onto Hillary, solidifying their claim to power. Systematically they will then root out every other republican, though fraudulent charges or they will simply "disappear" into the night.
It is a communist take over and their every intention.
The Supreme Court of the United States did nothing to "Interpret" the law nor shall it even though the Constitution is the Law, they could of stopped the "Impeachment" at the door, but stood idle. Everything is compromised. The world sits idle and watches in bewilderment, flabbergasted by the magicians tricks but ignorant to what is unforeseen of what the hands play in the shadows. As we stand with our jaws wide open they make their moves and set the stage, laws are passed under our noses further limiting our power as the people to even fight back.
We look at The left as being stupid, dumb and foolish but they are but meer puppets being controlled by the hive mind to which they follow. Don't be fooled. This is only the beginning.
>>253442>muh bastion>clearly from reddit>can't even pretend to be real anon
Fuck off back to your own lands, faggot.>>253438
Is it possible that they're simply going to use this outstanding bullshit as an impediment for other senate actions? Like taking a shit in the line at a super market, so that nobody gets to check out?
>>253442>It is a communist take over
Ok boomer, racial homogeneity is the faster way to repair the deprevation of communism,
communism is not the root issue. We know how much you like the scare words "socialism" and "communism" but really we should be calling it "gibs for browns".
of you went after the Israeli flag on the past?
>>253447>Gibs for browns
Since when were Mexicans our biggest threat?
Quickest way to destroy any nation is communism. Oh sorry, Cultural Marxismhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4Z-s2MHigohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-QP5TBTVhYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1iEzxW0z5A
It's clear both sides are controlled by Jews, but not the same Jews (for the most part). It's two heads of the dragon bickering over the spoils: one (the Soros faction) is globalist, socialist, and cultural Marxists to the core, and the other (the Netanyahu faction) is Zionist, civic nationalist, and supports a NATO-led NWO. They hate each other but what unites them is a hatred for any movement that espouses independence and traditionalism.>>253442>A King is a single person with absolute power, but what then when the body of people all become a single entity?
This was a gradual process that has existed since before the days of Abraham Lincoln and reflects a critical failure of politics as a whole.>then pass that onto Hillary
Don't make me laugh. Hillary's a has-been who has always tried aggrandizing herself but is ultimately weak and incapable. This is why so many other Democrats have smelled blood in the water and are running themselves.>>253448
Either it's the JIDF (hard to believe that even they are this stupid), someone using it as a meme flag, or someone who got pinned with it by a mod sometime in the past.
It isn't really that far fetched to see the house democrats try to give power back to Hilary. They keep edging her to run for presidency and still believe that she is the legitimate president. And on top of that, she keeps hinting about running, probably so she is waiting for after Trump is impeached
as she is under some delusion that she have and easy win if he is out of office permanently.
Never put anything past the left, if they are radical enough to impeach on nothing, they may just start wwIII because the waiter at the Ritz spilt their milk.
Trust me, they aren't the biggest threat.
Biggest threat is internal. If you can't even deal with the problems with in your own country, how are you supposed to deal with any other from outside your own country. The democrats in this country want "Open Boarders" in order to ensure an influx of non-Americans who will vote for them. They wouldn't even be a problem if not for the Democrats preventing boarder security, a wall, and actively trying to abolish ICE. Wouldn't be an issue if they didn't ban the word "Illegal Immigrant" and "Illegal Alien" and fine you up to $150,000 for use of that word, wouldn't be an issue if states didn't create sanctuaries where it is illegal to comply with federal officials to deport the illegal immigrants. Wouldn't be an issue for not the Dreamers, and the "Pathway to Citizenship" which solidifies them to staying here.
And why would they want to leave when they can vote democrat and get free healthcare for all, $1000 a week for sitting on their ass and be raised up like some aristocrat while they step on every other true American?
The statement shouldn't be, "To find who controls you, just find the one that you can't criticize" it should be, "To find who controls you, find the one that tells you that you can't criticize". Because that is your true enemy.
>Is it possible that they're simply going to use this outstanding bullshit as an impediment for other senate actions? Like taking a shit in the line at a super market, so that nobody gets to check out?
That's more or less what I think it's about at this point. Pelosi knows the impeachment isn't going to go anywhere and it's a complete waste of time to have a trial. At the same time she can't just say "never mind" and forget the whole thing, because the radicals in her party can't into strategy and don't seem to realize that impeachment is a fool's errand.
Refusing to formally hand over the impeachment articles is probably her best option at this point. There's no way to win and everyone knows the whole thing is just a partisan stunt anyway, so handing them over to the Senate is just going to result in an acquittal. She can't back down obviously because the radical left would be too pissed off. If she just stalls and refuses to hand the articles over on some bullshit grounds, she basically punts it back to the Senate. They hold the trial anyway, the charges are dismissed and impeachment dies, which is what she wants, but she and the other Democrats can pretend it was some kind of coverup attempt by the Republicans. If the Senate chooses to call her bluff and postpone the trial until they give them the articles, then she can just stall, keep the media drama going indefinitely and the fake impeachment hangs over Trump's head through the election. Either way she gets to pass the problem off to the Republican Senate and keep the impeachment trial from happening without it looking like she caved on anything.
She was basically pushed into an unwinnable fight by the retards in her party, and it looks like she's managed to find a way to back out of it while still making it look like it's the other side's fault. I hate her guts but I have to admit it's a pretty shrewd move.
From the sound of how the media is playing this whole, "I am just going to hold on to these articles indefinitely"
bullshit, it makes it sound as if that they plan to bypass the senate and take victory in the impeachment and force Trump from office with out any other interfering, eg, the Senate.
So what the hell is really going on?
>McConnell to Pelosi: You can keep your impeachment articles
>Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Thursday he wouldn’t negotiate the terms of a Senate trial with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who is threatening to withhold the articles of impeachment. >“It’s beyond me how the speaker and Democratic leader in the Senate think withholding the articles of impeachment and not sending them over gives them leverage,” McConnell told reporters Thursday. “Frankly, I’m not anxious to have the trial.”
>Pelosi said Thursday she plans to send the House-passed impeachment articles to the Senate as soon as lawmakers strike a deal on how to conduct a trial. >“The next thing for us will be when we see the process that is set forth in the Senate,” Pelosi said. “Then, we’ll know the number of monitors that we may have to go forward.”
>The House is poised to adjourn for the year, leaving impeachment in limbo. There are no immediate plans for lawmakers to vote on a resolution to appoint managers who would deliver the articles to the Senate. The House will next convene the week of Jan. 7. >McConnell rejected demands by Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, that the Senate subpoena former and current Trump administration officials to testify at a Senate trial. >McConnell said the Senate would hold a trial based on the evidence presented in the House. >“If she thinks her case is so weak she doesn’t want to send it over, throw me into that briar patch,” McConnell said.http://archive.is/mgsFh
If they attempted something like that it literally would be grounds to start Civil War II. The House has absolutely no legal authority to remove the President from office, only the Senate can do that. The Democrats at that point would be showing their hand and openly admitting that they have no respect whatsoever for the Constitution, they just want to control everything. An action like that would go beyond using the FBI to conduct a rigged investigation or trying to push through an impeachment on partisan lines; those methods are underhanded but they are still technically conducted within the bounds of the law. The House attempting to bypass the Senate and remove Trump by force would be a blatant, open disregard of Constitutionally mandated powers, literally an act of sedition. I can't believe even the Democrats are that insane, but at this point who knows.
Well perhaps there is a point to one said previous statement, a magicians trick, that all this impeachment is anyhow. What everyone see's (Or they have you believe) is that this was a fair and just trial in the house and the President, as many said in their statements, are committing crimes as they spoke.
That is their guise, and remember it is "Urgent" that they put a stop to him. So, if the Senate won't impeach Trump because they feel that in the Senate it won't be fair to them and he is commuting crimes even now and even then, and is a "Threat to National Security" *Which wasn't even a charge against him but in every statement made* In serious thought, tell me how far would they then go to create another "smokescreen" to try to go around the Senate or implicate members of the Senate to "Conspiring" or "Colluding" with an "Impeached" President, "Who refuses to step down". Oh and don't mind the quotes because because they are used for emphasis as well as what they actually say.
Thing is even you said, "With in bounds of the law" yeah the law says that if you do something "Illegal" then you should be charged but it says nothing about not having due process, to not meet your accusers, to be charged on a crime that isn't even on the books as a crime. To have a double standard which a former sitting official does the same thing and is considered "Foreign Policy" -Georgy Poregie *imaginary friend of big bird* And then be found guilty
to which the process of impeachment is clear by the Constitution.
Bounds of law? What is this, Open Boarders for the Constitution? Do what the fuck you want because, law, what is , law? Serious question is if the Judicial Branch is to "Interpret" the laws, then why didn't they define the boundaries and try to stop this sham? I think that is what pisses me off the most is all the shit they get away with and no one steps in to stop the corruption.
Trump can destroy the traitors anytime he wants https://video.foxnews.com/v/6116884055001#sp=show-clips
but I expect he will let the Dems destroy themselves repeatedly into 2020. With their continual failure and Trump's continual "escape" Left/Dem/DS and their followers confidence will continue to fall. When the indictments get unsealed near the election - total victory.https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1207720412404240386https://twitter.com/M2Madness/status/1207699372055711744
I wonder what 4 years of Trump getting to do everything he wants looks like?
>>252933>You know why the similar murder rates? Because in those places the governments have collapsed and cartels are the dominant political power>I was gonna say that they have too many niggers.
Distinction without difference, I think
Never will happen. Some 30 year larper in their mothers basement with their guns and bibles thinking that the whole world will wake up with their red pills
is just as dilusional as the far left infesting every country.
See the left is winning and there is nothing you can do about it. Guns? Good by bump stocks, whats next, red flag laws (two confirmed deaths due to it); no stand your ground, you have the right to hide instead because fleeing is provocation; and good by gubs in every other country. Just like good little lambs.
Good bye free speech, censored online by every source that funnrls and controls your data. Oh but continue to praise capitalism, oh you just start you own service? 12 years latter and crickets. Don't misgender someone, oops you going to jail.
So, when all your freedoms are gone, which they are, still thinking of civil war? Oh but mr is our god, no you got Pence. Face it, consevatives are good little lambs and any who stray are devoured by the wolves.
So be a good little lamb, that we may collect when time comes to feast.(You)
I turn on the news, everyone is saying that Trump is officially Impeached. So does that mean that Pence is now the President. Can Trump, being officially Impeached, not be able to run again in 2020?
I thought that to be impeached, like a bill, had to go through both house and senate. So how can he officially be Impeached if it never went to the Senate?
Clinton wasn't removed from office, he wasn't officially Impeached. So why is even Fox saying this is official. I don't understand.
>>253503>I don't understand.
I believe it is because you watch kike TV.
Have a normie friendly explanation:
>Trump Was IMPEACHED And Democrats Revealed Their REAL And INSANE Strategyhttps://www.bitchute.com/video/mxX5N25BA0o/
>>253503>So why is even Fox saying this is official. I don't understand.>why
Just one word "jüdenpresse".
Clip from https://www.bitchute.com/video/z1GlpQe8iAWB
I see it as a 5 step process. The House Dems have done steps 1 and 2, they refuse to do step 3. You have to get to step 5 to kick Trump out.
1. House debates impeachment.
2. House votes on impeachment, needs simple majority. Dems have majority so it passes.
You are here. House Dems refuse to do step 3.
3. House does some extra stuff and passes documents to the Senate.
4. Senate acts like a courtroom and calls withneses etc.
5. Senate votes on impeachment needs 2/3rds majority
to impeach. Repubs have the majority in the Senate they will likely not vote for impeachment, 2/3rds can't be reached.
Because the Senate does not get the documents etc. they can't nullify the impeachment or dismiss Trump. Trump remains technically impeached, but without any actual effect because only the Senate can do the dismissal.
Why? Because leaving it in limbo he is technically "impeached". Orange man bad! Personally I think being impeached by the deep state will end up being a badge of honor.
Not even a second in.>Donald Trump has finally been Impeached.
Well shit, Who is going to run for 2020 now? Are democrats running unopposed? He is Impeached, will Trump be returning to his business, he cant be President again.
This is close enough. The main detail that usually confuses people is that impeachment does not mean removed from office. Impeachment just means that the House has charged him with a crime that he can be tried in the Senate for, and will be removed from office if found guilty. Clinton was impeached but he was acquitted in the Senate so he was not removed from office.
People usually think of the two as one and the same, which the Democrats are using to their advantage here. However in this case it's still bullshit because he hasn't technically been impeached yet. They drafted articles which they are refusing to do anything with, but they're walking around crowing about how they impeached Trump, which doesn't even mean anything beyond that the next step is a trial he's bound to be acquitted in. This whole thing is so idiotic it's making my head hurt.
I think you're mostly right, but contrary to popular opinion I think Dems are trying to play the long game here.
They pretty much know they can't beat Trump in 2020, so aside from maintaining appearances they're not trying to. Whether the candidates all know that is irrelevant, and most probably don't
know, and those who do are just promoting themselves for the time being on the donations that idiots are giving them.
Pelosi is planning to make the case that "Trump is impeached, but those ebil 'Publicans in thurr senate won't let us get rid of him" (with an entirely complicit MSM) and draw that out as long as possible, both to maintain their electability amongst their base and the delusional mentality who will maintain and run with "Hurr, he's dar impeacheded! Him are not legitimate!" for as long as they've run with "Muh Russia!" (which one will note, they're STILL running with).
This gambit is intended to try and take both the house AND the senate by 2022 - probably with an economic crash along the way to undermine the growth Trump has facilitated - to fully and totally impeach Trump at that point, hoping to trend toward a Democratic President, House, and Senate by 2024, who will undo everything Trump has and will do over the entire 8 years and then return to their progressive agenda with a vengeance fueled and reinforced by 6-8 years of Trump rustling their jimmies and taking away their toys.
I coined that term quite some time ago to refer to the war of culture being fought in the shadows which strip away our rights that is unbeknownst to the normies.
>>253269>>Lawyers for the House told a federal court on Monday that lawmakers will continue their impeachment investigation even after the House votes later this week to impeach President Donald Trump.
What does this mean? The Senate dismisses all Articles against the president and the House just keeps writing more articles over and over with a perpetual impeachment where they just keep voting and voting? Is that what Trump will go down in history as, the most times impeached in the house?
Someone really has to explain this bullshit in lame man's terms because that is what it sounds like is going to happen and in all of what is holy, how the fuck is this even allowed to happen?
>>253515>The main detail that usually confuses people is that impeachment does not mean removed from office.
I think we need to shift our language when discussing this in online spaces, using 'impeached' only reinforces the democrat's narrative for this that Trump isn't technically the president anymore. If we refer to it exclusively as 'impeachment' or some other word that carries the implication of an ongoing process, we can more easily dispel the notion that he has been impeached. Obviously we'd be doing this in addition to driving home the point that the senate actually needs to vote to remove Trump from office, but there's no harm in >implying
the point subtly.
I don't think the conservative right is a rupert drop at all. Our nation as well as yours and many others around the world has all been plagued but years, decades of subversion by the communists, yes communists. They have been at this for quite a long time and in turn have been very successful.
Speaking from my own country, they have brain washed millions of children, weakened our military, restricted our rights, destroyed the nuclear family, destroyed our religion and made a mockery there of, and so much more. What it does is that it weakens out nation so severely that we who are willing to fight back is powerless by the overwhelming opposition.
There is a reason why the Military will only take soldiers from 18-35, these are the most fit to fight. Most people who are in the 18-25 year range are mind rapped by schools and colleges and have been fully radicalized into the far left. 30-35 and they are with out a family of their own, a NEET being the majority in this group and so heavily depressed that the Opium epidemic has exploded as well as the suicide rates of young men in this age group. We have been told to give up, and we are. For the few of us that are tenacious and willing to continue our lives and to fight back, we are not willing because of the chilling effects.
We stand alone against the onslaught of left attacks while we are smeared in public by the MSM and fired from our jobs for conservative "Wrong Think" because some SJW decided to dox us. Perhaps we were just starting out in life and really looking to go far in our not jobs, but careers when suddenly, we are tossed out on the streets because "COMPANY NAME HERE does not condone the ideologies and views of SAID EMPLOYEE, and has a 0 tolerance policy against racism, sexism, homophobia, Xenophobia, hate speech and bigotry and has been terminated from working with COMPANY NAME HERE".
Who wants to throw their perfect life away when they are just starting off on their own, who doesn't come from high society families where they had to work for every penny in their pockets instead of being handed everything on a silver platter because their family were all born with silver spoons in their mouths?
Anyone outside this age group and they don't care, they are too old to fight and they already, many of them, served our country in previous wars to know exactly how frivolous it is when you fight always for the ZOG and nothing EVER changes. History keeps repeating and it doesn't get better, it gets worse. Talk to a couple of Vietnam vets, you will understand, talk to wwII vets and you would cry for how the world is all living in hell and to stupid to realize how bad things really are.
Thing is, though as bad as it all sounds. The revolutionary war was fought and won with just a handful of men for the nation being quite new, was in the same state. Men not able to fight, unwilling, and didn't want to cross the crown. It will just be on a greater scale. But the same none the less. What will kill us off fast though is not fighting at all and dieing alone. To have a resistance,of any kind or caliber (not violent included) is to be organized. We aren't. But that is for the same reasons as above. Any will to fight back is putting a target on yourself, and we all know how that ends up.
But where is the red line?
Where is the straw that breaks the camels back?
How far will be pushed before the spring recoils?
Who the hell knows but the sad thing is that the left has systematically destroyed the world and before you know it, there won't be any red lines, it will be a tipping point instead, a point in their favor and not ours. The bot stated that no nation stood up, soviet union, cuba, etc. Lies. They all stood up as the communist movement wasn't culture marxism but open war. They fought a civil war and lost. Red vs White army. VietCog vs RVN, North Vs South Korea (noone really won that one still going, technically)Point being that by the time open war broke out, it was too late for the opposition towards communism to do anything of value.
You put out the flame before it becomes an inferno and this flame has become a fire, how far will it go? When it becomes a brush fire?, Consumes the forest? If we don't start rallying, we are the ones going to be consumed by fire not the other way around.
With all this bullshit in my country with the radical left and impeachment that has been ongoing for 3.5 years, the subversion, the open communists (socialism is the same thing) This impeachment is just a drop in the pond, the ocean even, and they keep getting away with it. Not even the third branch of government here. SCOTUS has put an end to the shenanigans.
TL:DR Impeachment is just the start; we been subverted for years, not well organized; chilling effects; no red line; approaching a tipping point where any effort will be too little too late.
When you have a suspect of a crime and you after an investigation conclude that this person in question, has enough evidence to the attention of the courts against them to hold a trial, don't you then deliberate to which charges to bring up against them before they are then tried for a crime?
In other words, isn't what happened in the house nothing more than an agreement of what charges to bring forth to the president where the President was only charged but not tried?
Is it not that the Senate after receiving the articles of impeachment then try the President?
And a further note. With all the MSM saying that "Trump is officially Impeached" isn't that also saying "Guilty until proven innocent"? As if Trump hasn't been denied his due process.
Also I wanted to point out a theory I sorta have.
After the whole BS with Nacy Pelocy not turning over the Articles of Impeachment. Many are confounded on the right as to why and just what all this BS is about wanting to know how things are going to play in the Senate.
I believe that it is bullshit not is the sense of "omg these radical democrats think they can control everything" kind of way but bullshit as in the sense that even she knows it is bullshit and just and excuse.
Excuse for what? I don't think that Nancy wanted impeachment, she did yes, but didn't because she knew how it would backfire and even now, still knows it very well. The radical left however has her more or less tied and chained and even though she knows well that the Senate will throw out the whole thing, she purposelessly stalled handing over the articles for one reason, Christmas. (holidays)
The far left are delusional and still think that they can go through with it and are fools. But Nancy knows the truth as well as the more moderate democrats but they want to believe that all is well in their little minds. So Nancy withholds the articles so that every Democrat could have a "Merry Impeachmas". If she didn't then everyone's holiday would be spoiled as the Senate would rush to get it to trial and toss it all out and that would just spoil their little holiday.
In otherwords, it all bullshit.
>>253539>don't you then deliberate to which charges to bring up against them before they are then tried for a crime?
Only they've already done this, that is literally the first step of an impeachment process. This is ignoring the fact they have practically no evidence of any wrongdoing, only their say so, which house representatives have agreed is enough. And yes, yes it is, which is typical of communists. Also cut that reddit spacing shit out, it's autistic and makes your posts harder to read.
>>253542>What are paragraphs
Why don't you learn what a paragraph is before you comment on calling someone else's formatting "Reddit" spacing. Between each sentence there are two breaks. Not one between every paragraph. A paragraph is a contained idea or though which can be anywhere from one to several sentences. Traditionally you would try to have paragraphs no more than five sentences each just to make it easier to follow with out a word wall of text where ideas are lost.
If it is that hard to read, narrow your browser and place it on one half of the screen. If you were on your phone, you wouldn't be complaining. OH! and by the way narrowing your browser if it truly were reddit posting wouldn't create defined paragraphs. Now if you really want to me annoyed. I'll just start using MLA formatting. But let us not stray too far from the topic shall we?
Paragraphs consist of 3-5 sentences, not a single sentence.
>>253547>If you were on your phone, you wouldn't be complaining
That's not a good thing.
I'm actually not necessarily against double-spacing like this, since it helps break up long pieces of text into sections, but you aren't using it like that. You're using it with every single sentence, which makes your writing feel really bloated and hard to read. Fucking stop it.
Albeit that there are many standards to a paragraph, a paragraph is still defined as follows:a distinct section of a piece of writing, usually dealing with a single theme and indicated by a new line, indentation, or numbering.
This means that even though a shopping list, lists individual items on a new line, it is still considered a paragraph by definition. This means that even though I list a question on an individual line, because they contain an individual thought, they are a paragraph. Again, standards will vary; even so. I will never double space between each line as you can clearly see in reddit posters which as I aforementioned by narrowing your browser, there is none. >>253549
Again there is no double spacing.
This is a sentence of words and more words with a single space.
This is another sentence of words and more words but to follow will be a third sentence.
This sentence comes after the second and oh look at that horrible double reddit space! I must of hit that bar one too many times. See the difference! or are you still blind?
I'm going to avoid giving the redditor and the sperg the [You] they crave and simply contribute something to the discussion like a non-nigger.>>253510
It's funny you mention this, because Ted Cruz put out a pretty great video on Twitter that I think puts him in the top 3 republican candidates for sure.https://twitter.com/yct/status/1207703372817678339
Not archived because I'm a lazy faggot who doesn't care enough about twitter to archive it.
I'm willing to vote for him, even if he is a beaner.
>>253551>usually dealing with a single theme and indicated by a new line
Which is what you're not doing, your entire post deals with a single overall theme which you've broken up into their own 'paragraphs' for reasons flimsier than this impeachment. Reddit spacing is more than just 'double spacing', it also refers to the extremely fragmented nature of their posts, which they do habitually because of mobile posting. It looks perfectly fine on a screen that small, but for anyone using an actual monitor, as you should, it just looks and reads like ass. Mobile browsing was a fucking mistake.
Getting back to the point, as I said, the House has already deliberated on the 'charges', all of this is a blatant refusal to proceed with the process. I'd say they're waiting for the senate seats to go up for election hoping to improve their chances of passing it in the event Trump gets elected for a second term and they win more seats in the senate. One of these is likely, the other is not. As for why they did it this soon, maybe they're predicting they'll lose the House again, at which point there'd be no getting it through at all.
Okay you can both stop being retards and talk about the topic of the thread now.
I can argue that a letter document is 8x11in (OMG IMPERIAL USE METRIC YOU PLEB)and not 11x8in but this is just going to go in circles arguing till the cows come home and that isn't going to do anything. If you want me to word wall you for your convenience then I will but don't bitch to me again when you can't read anything.>>253552 What is 529 Savings Plan? Also, allot of the things that Ted has mentioned Tucker has also mentioned as what they have been trying to rush to pass all the while when the people are distracted by impeachment. Even so, if this all has been left on the door step of the Senete, wouldn't they be the wiser to not let it go though since they have majority? I think with out even reading all the pages of the document, what over 2000 worth, they would have an idea of what it contains and seeks to do.
Honestly, what were you expecting with the whole "impeachment" fiasco? The house refuses to release the articles to the Senate, and the house all left for the holidays. See >>253540
There won't be anything new until next year, all the meanwhile the left will be jumping up and down like cheerful idiots, the right will be furious, and all of it will be a smokescreen for more hankey pankey in the background to try to get done as the public stays ignorant. So in the mean time, I think the topic has moved from directly about impeachment to how it is being used as a ploy.
all we have left is paragraphs.
what do now?
This is practically a six-minute-long redemption arc in terms of his presentation. Election Ted was infinitely less vigorous and enticing than this Ted.
Maybe I was just unattentive back in the election but Ted's always seemed like a cuck until Trump came along all fire-and-brimstone. But now? I feel Ted's burn. And I'm feelin' nice and drunk.
Back in 2012, it was Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Rand Paul who all got together to spearhead a filibuster against the renewal of the PATRIOT act. I thought they were all pretty cool dudes then. Come 2016, Cruz and Rubio were both sucking off the PATRIOT act as hard as they could during the republican debates.
Cruz is a snake. He'll hop on whatever bandwagon is convenient at the moment without any regard for what's good or true. If he happens to say something you agree with, it's only because it's in his masters' temporary best interest right now.
And so it begins…
Wow. That's pretty shifty indeed. Normally if someone at first was fooled but then realized that it was a sham, like with the Patriot act, I would forgive and forget. But if it's the opposite, I very much do not appreciate it.
On a more positive note, it's good Rand and Ron Pauls both haven't cucked on the Patriot act, eh?
Of course he does.
Does he have evidence also on Quid Pro Joe?
>>254088>being this delusional thinking the house impeachment is actually the one that will bring him down this time around
Give up your delusions of grandeur faggot your cuckchan fake memes won't do a damn thing to help you from becoming the biggest losers in history.
It looks 100% legit to me.
You're not very smart are you. The joke in this image is that regardless of whether or not he gets impeached, Israel will still be funded, globalism will still rise in other countries and put pressure on the US to commit to it as well, and immigrants will replace you, legal and illegal alike.
Go back to r/the_Donald you fucking mongol.
This. Fake memes don't exist. Not unless they're not believed or enjoyed by anyone
, but if someone made it then chances are that's one person.
topkek. No matter what happens in the next decade, I'll never stop loving MM.
A meme, by definition, is an idea that spreads. If only one person believes it, it's not a meme, and if only a few believe it, it's not a very good one.
But it's not fake, is the point.
I dunno about that, honestly. I think that there are plenty of memes that come from misunderstandings or misinterpretations. Perhaps they may not be deep memes, but there've always been shallow or weak memes.
>>254124>T_D visitor and Trump's cheerleader
An article was just posted describing in a brilliant manner what is going on with NPCs at both sides of the mainstream political spectrum and how they are played.
Its lecture is highly MANDATED.
>https://www.zerohedge.com/political/leftist-cult-vs-trump-cult-similarities-and-differences>“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy….Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”>The false Left/Right tactic has become more and more exposed in the past decade to the wider public, and so the elites had to change their methods to adapt to the growing awareness. Conservatives in particular have started to leave the plantation, and something had to be done to drag them back. The liberty movement has become a force in western life with tens of millions of members. It is an unpredictable element that the establishment needs to lock down and redirect if they ever hope to achieve their goal of a “new world order”.
>>254124>your cuckchan fake memes won't do a damn thing
No need for memes now.
Trump is doing all by himself.
Facts trumps memes.
Stupid, low-IQ, lazy, blind, deaf, and dumb VOTERS on BOTH sides I see. Nothing ever changes, regardless which "party" gets in.
I tried to warn everyone on my blog after the dust settled from the 2016 (s)elections, but NOOOOOOO, "The Donald" is going to fix everything.
Even the stupid dumb-fucks on IW, (not-so-)Breitbart, et al wouldn't hear it any other way.
The Trump-Chump just turns out to be another sell-out on these US of A! I gave him a chance. I watched and waited before forming an opinion (damn those things!). Well, patience and careful watching has paid off. He's shilling for the big "C's", and for the big "I" as well. (That's ISRAEL, for those of you asking.)
The "Chump" is even going to expand the H-1B guest visas to bring in, get this - MORE skilled techies, because HE thinks Americans are STUPID! As does that vile Jared Kuschner, and his shitty little slut-of-a-show-wife also think that. So, the Big C's get their cheap labor in spades because of Trump-the-Traitor!
Read'em and weep, boys and girls (and whatever other call themselves), America has been NEO-CONNED - just like we saw during both Bush's, Clintoons, Hussein Obama, et al.
The dumb-fuck "voters" went back to sleep after (s)election day, as usual. Nobody wants to do shit to save what's left of their country, and even go so far as to shit on those of us rattling their chains to do it.
- "Seen it all before: Same 'ol wine in new bottles!"
Americans are so dead and degraded now that if the US Army liquidates Fargo tomorrow, no one would even shrug.
[Last 50 Posts]
If it is, why should be relevant?