Quote:
How does one get to point where they are shooting up a public space? Below I will outline what it takes to get there, as well as what it means to be one of the guys you see with his face pasted all over CNN. It takes more than a desolate sex life, pair of wire rim glasses and legal gun permit.
I will include links or references, I will not stop to explain who they are or what the links relate to. They are there for those that need another source, if they need it. They are not in a particular order, or even directly relate to the sentence they follow. The post is designed to read fine without needing to click the links. These are simply some areas in which I learned similar information. I am tired of providing links in the comments for those who need evidence. I will do my best but it is up to you to use search functions and to think for yourself. I will provide more links at the end of the post.
So how does one become an mk ultra public shooter?
First, you will be born into a family that struggles with generational abuse. Abuse in the same sense as a family that struggles with cycles of generational alcoholism or sexual abuse, yet has been struggling with demons for centuries upon centuries. Abuse that doesn't ever get talked about in the light of day ( http://www.whale.to/b/pedophocracy.html ). Abuse that is so severe that a normal mind could not begin to cultivate it's severity, depth and influence ( https://www.nytimes.com/1996/10/21/world/275000-in-belgium-protest-handling-of-child-sex-scandal.html) ( https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1991-05-17-9102140259-story.html) . Abuse that will lock you inside yourself for the rest of your life because admitting it happened means you have to remember it ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5oR2KsYEqY ) ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9__tMLGZUc ).
Some call it MK ultra, others believe in it as as you would believe in a philosophy or government. It still exists today ( https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9nq52e/mk_ultra_was_never_shut_down_just_renamed/ ). Others see it as a brand with it's own culture and symbols ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB7gHCj8TZk&list=PL9p-kr1darp0F7uBATreNyqoADPei4lN_ ). It is a mix of all of these things and is not what many believe it to be. It is based in trauma and on the psychological principle of disassociation. It is perpetrated by our government and military as well ( https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1037/h0079332 ) ( https://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol?gclid=Cj0KCQjwhJrqBRDZARIsALhp1WSTUQWK8VCmUXmZrPrfSd8SwgdypwUfk5d2Rart-WhlqiFh6H3ejvkaAiyiEALw_wcB ) ( https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-05-01-me-3161-story.html ).
When the trauma is very severe, it sometimes cannot be processed and the child dissociates from reality to cope with the trauma( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439425/ ). This is a survival mechanism and happens more often in children as the key is not necessarily the severity of the trauma but the inability to process it. This is a practice of denial of self. It is practiced by the highest in government and by our Doctors and academics ( https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/impromptu-man/201205/harvards-experiment-the-unabomber-class-62 ) ( https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/svali) ( https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/a21qyt/when_reading_bush_sr_memorials_today_keep_in_mind/ ).
When disassociated, you will become a blank slate to be impressed upon. A new personality is created as your core personality splits just as one might fragment a hard drive into two separate operating systems. When one system is operating the other is shutdown and unaware( https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/dissociative-identity-disorder-multiple-personality-disorder ). Additionally, they use different storage so they do not communicate or overlap. This process happens during any severe trauma that cannot be coped with yet is nothing alike the condition of being 'programmed.' Programming can include tens of hundreds of intentional splits and different personalities, all with different training and histories. Most victims are completely unaware the extent, if at all, that they are programmed( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzPlo7PQcWI ).
You will be born into a family of "bloodline" status which will program you( https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/cfvskf/all_44_presidents_are_related_they_all_come_from/ ) . A self label that justifies ruling over others in the same way that your family will rule over, abuse and submit you to rape and torture, at the hands of strangers, friends and above all, them. Or, maybe you're abducted at a young age and then trained under the guise of a false personality and false family (https://www.nytimes.com/1987/02/08/us/inquiry-spreads-on-6-children-and-cult.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=17F417943110468351D14364275A5429&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALL) .
Intentional programming of an infant in the Illuminati often begins before birth. Prenatal splitting is well known in the cult, as the fetus is very capable of fragmenting in the womb due to trauma. This is usually done between the seventh and ninth month of pregnancy. Techniques used include: placing headphones on the mother's abdomen, and playing loud, discordant music (such as some modern classical pieces, or even Wagner's operas). Loud, heavy rock has also been used. Other methods include having the mother ingest quantities of bitter substances, to make the amniotic fluid bitter, or yelling at the fetus inside the womb. The mother's abdomen may be hit as well. Mild shock to the abdomen may be applied, especially when term is near, and may be used to cause premature labor, or ensure that the infant is born on a ceremonial holiday. Certain labor inducing drugs may be also given if a certain birth date is desired(Svali, Chapter 4)( https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/svali_speaks_book.pdf) .
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
As a future school shooter, you will go through five primary areas of psychological training when you are young. The following is paraphrased from the Svali link directly preceding this paragraph.
First Lesson: to not need. You will be placed in a room without any sensory stimulus, usually a training room with gray, white, or beige walls. An adult will leave and the you will be left alone, for periods of time: these may vary from hours, to an entire day as the training progresses and you grow older. If you beg the adult to stay, and not leave, or scream, you will be beaten, and told that the periods of isolation will increase until they learn to stop being weak. The ostensible purpose of this discipline is to teach you to rely on your own internal resources, and not on outside people ("strengthen it"). What it actually does is create a huge terror of abandonment.
When the adult, or trainer, returns to the room, the child is often found rocking itself, or hugging itself in a corner, occasionally almost catatonic from fear. The trainer will then "rescue" the child, feed and give it something to drink and bond with the child as their "savior".
The trainer will tell you they are "family" and will rescue you, because the family "loves" you.
The trainer will instill cult teachings, at this point, into the helpless, fearful, and almost insanely grateful child who has just been "rescued" from isolation. The trainer will reinforce in the child over and over how much it "needs " its family, who just rescued it from death by starvation or abandonment. This will teach the very young toddler to associate comfort and security with bonding with its trainer, who may be one of its parents, and being with "family" members. The cult is very aware of child developmental principles, and has developed exercises like the above after hundreds of years of teaching very young children.
Second Lesson: To not want. This step is very similar to the first step, and actually reinforces it. It will be done intermittently with the first step over the next few years of the child's life. Again, you will be left alone in a training room, or isolated room, without food or water for a long period of time. An adult will enter the room, with a large pitcher of ice water, or food. If you ask for either, as the adult is eating or drinking in front of the child, you will be severely punished for being weak and needy. This step is reinforced, until you earn not to ask for food or water unless it is offered first. You will become completely dissociated from its own needs for food, water, and other comforts, someone who becomes afraid to ask outside adults for help.
This creates in the child a hyper-vigilance as she/he learns to look for outside adults for cues on when it is okay to fulfill needs, and not to trust her/his own body signals. The child is already learning to look outside itself to others to learn how it should think or feel, instead of trusting its own feelings. The cult now becomes the focus of control for the child.
Third Lesson: to not wish. You will be placed in a room with favorite toys, or objects. A kind adult will come into the room and engage you in child in play. This adult my be a friend, aunt, parent, or trainer. You and adult may engage in fantasy play about the child's secret wishes, dreams, or wants. This will occur on several occasions, and your trust is slowly gained. At some later point, you will be severely punished for any aspect of wishing or fantasy shared with the adult, including the destruction of favorite toys, going in and undoing or destroying secret safe places you may have created, or even destroying non cult protectors.
This step is repeated, with variations, many times over the ensuing years. Occasionally, the child's siblings, parents, or friends will be used to reveal inside fantasies the child has revealed to them during the daytime, or in unguarded moments. The ostensible reason the cult gives for this step is to create a child who doesn't fantasize, who is more outwardly directed, less inwardly directed. In other words, the child is to look to adults for permission in all aspects of its life, including internal.
The reality is that this step destroys all safe places the child has created internally, to retreat from the horrors it is experiencing. This step creates in the child the feeling that there is no true safety, that the cult will find out everything it thinks. Exercises like this are also used to create young alters in the child who will self report to the cult trainers any secret safe places, or covert wishes against the cult, that other alters have. This will then begin to set up intersystem hostility and divisiveness, which the cult will manipulate throughout the person's life span in order to control them.
First Lesson: to not need. You will be placed in a room without any sensory stimulus, usually a training room with gray, white, or beige walls. An adult will leave and the you will be left alone, for periods of time: these may vary from hours, to an entire day as the training progresses and you grow older. If you beg the adult to stay, and not leave, or scream, you will be beaten, and told that the periods of isolation will increase until they learn to stop being weak. The ostensible purpose of this discipline is to teach you to rely on your own internal resources, and not on outside people ("strengthen it"). What it actually does is create a huge terror of abandonment.
When the adult, or trainer, returns to the room, the child is often found rocking itself, or hugging itself in a corner, occasionally almost catatonic from fear. The trainer will then "rescue" the child, feed and give it something to drink and bond with the child as their "savior".
The trainer will tell you they are "family" and will rescue you, because the family "loves" you.
The trainer will instill cult teachings, at this point, into the helpless, fearful, and almost insanely grateful child who has just been "rescued" from isolation. The trainer will reinforce in the child over and over how much it "needs " its family, who just rescued it from death by starvation or abandonment. This will teach the very young toddler to associate comfort and security with bonding with its trainer, who may be one of its parents, and being with "family" members. The cult is very aware of child developmental principles, and has developed exercises like the above after hundreds of years of teaching very young children.
Second Lesson: To not want. This step is very similar to the first step, and actually reinforces it. It will be done intermittently with the first step over the next few years of the child's life. Again, you will be left alone in a training room, or isolated room, without food or water for a long period of time. An adult will enter the room, with a large pitcher of ice water, or food. If you ask for either, as the adult is eating or drinking in front of the child, you will be severely punished for being weak and needy. This step is reinforced, until you earn not to ask for food or water unless it is offered first. You will become completely dissociated from its own needs for food, water, and other comforts, someone who becomes afraid to ask outside adults for help.
This creates in the child a hyper-vigilance as she/he learns to look for outside adults for cues on when it is okay to fulfill needs, and not to trust her/his own body signals. The child is already learning to look outside itself to others to learn how it should think or feel, instead of trusting its own feelings. The cult now becomes the focus of control for the child.
Third Lesson: to not wish. You will be placed in a room with favorite toys, or objects. A kind adult will come into the room and engage you in child in play. This adult my be a friend, aunt, parent, or trainer. You and adult may engage in fantasy play about the child's secret wishes, dreams, or wants. This will occur on several occasions, and your trust is slowly gained. At some later point, you will be severely punished for any aspect of wishing or fantasy shared with the adult, including the destruction of favorite toys, going in and undoing or destroying secret safe places you may have created, or even destroying non cult protectors.
This step is repeated, with variations, many times over the ensuing years. Occasionally, the child's siblings, parents, or friends will be used to reveal inside fantasies the child has revealed to them during the daytime, or in unguarded moments. The ostensible reason the cult gives for this step is to create a child who doesn't fantasize, who is more outwardly directed, less inwardly directed. In other words, the child is to look to adults for permission in all aspects of its life, including internal.
The reality is that this step destroys all safe places the child has created internally, to retreat from the horrors it is experiencing. This step creates in the child the feeling that there is no true safety, that the cult will find out everything it thinks. Exercises like this are also used to create young alters in the child who will self report to the cult trainers any secret safe places, or covert wishes against the cult, that other alters have. This will then begin to set up intersystem hostility and divisiveness, which the cult will manipulate throughout the person's life span in order to control them.
Fourth Lesson: the survival of the fittest. This step is used in order to begin creating perpetrator alters in you from a young age You will be brought into a room where there is a trainer and another child of approximately the same age, or slightly younger. You will be severely beaten, for a long period of time, by the trainer, then told to hit the other child in the room, or they will be beaten further. If you refuse, it is punished severely, the other child is punished as well, then the child is told to punish the other child. If you refuse, or cry, or try to hit the trainer instead, you will continue to be beaten severely, and told to hit the other child, to direct its anger at the other child.
This step is repeated until the child finally complies. This step is begun around age 2 to 2 1/2, and is used to create aggressive perpetrator alters in the young child. As the child becomes older, the punishing tasks become more and more brutal. Children are expected to become perpetrators of others at very young ages, and will "practice" on children younger than themselves, with the encouragement and rewarding by the adults around them. They will also be mimicking these adults, who role model perpetration constantly as normal.
The child will be taught that this is the acceptable outlet for the aggressive impulses and rage that are created by the brutality the child is constantly being exposed to.
Fifth Lesson: the code of silence. Many, many different stratagems are used to put this in, starting at around the age of two years old, when a child starts becoming more verbal.
After a ritual or group gathering, you will be asked about what you saw, or heard, during the meeting. Like most obedient young children, you will comply. You are then immediately severely beaten, or tortured, and a new alter is created, who is told to keep or guard the memories of what was seen, on pain of their life. The new part always agrees. You and this new part are put through a ceremony of swearing to never ever tell; and alters are created whose job it is to kill the body, if the other parts ever remember. You will also be put through severe psychological torture to ensure that it will never be tempted to tell, including: being buried alive; near drowning; watching "traitor's deaths" involving slow painful torture, such as being burned, or skinned alive; being buried with a partially rotted corpse and being told that they will become a corpse like it if they ever tell, etc. The scenarios go on and on, invented by people with endlessly cruel imaginations, in order to ensure secrecy.
These methods have been perfected over hundreds of years of practice by the cult with its children. The reason these things are done is self evident: the cult is involved in criminal activities, as explained in the first few chapters of this book, and they want to ensure the continued silence of its children. This is one reason why the cult has survived so long, and with its continued shroud of secrecy; why more survivors are afraid/ unwilling to disclose their abuse. In order to reveal cult secrets, a child must go against some of the most tremendously horrendous psychological trauma and abuse imaginable; even as an adult, the survivor has difficulty putting these things aside, when discussing their abuse. Children and adults alike are told that if they ever tell, they will be hunted down and shot (the assassin training lets the child know that this is no idle threat); that they will be tortured slowly. The child will be exposed to setups and role plays throughout their growing up that reinforces this step
So, now that you've been indoctrinated and programmed, where do you go? What does your life look like? How do you get from here to there i.e. actually shooting up a school.
Military training is begun quite young. It is often started by three years of age with simple exercises. You will be taken by your parents to a training area, which may be a large inside auditorium, or a remote area outside where training maneuvers are done. Tents are set up, with command centers for the different commanding officers and military trainers. Looks something like this:https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/95pmjy/man_arrested_in_new_mexico_was_training_kids_to/ .
You will be taught to march in time, keeping a straight line. You will be punished by being kicked, shocked with a cattle prod, or beaten with a baton if you move out of place. You will be dressed in small uniforms in imitation of the adults. The adults will have ranks, badges and insignia indicating their level of achievement in the cult hierarchy and military. Badges and medals are given out to indicate the person's level of training and tests passed. Commanding officers are often brutal and will teach even the youngest children with harsh measures.
This step is repeated until the child finally complies. This step is begun around age 2 to 2 1/2, and is used to create aggressive perpetrator alters in the young child. As the child becomes older, the punishing tasks become more and more brutal. Children are expected to become perpetrators of others at very young ages, and will "practice" on children younger than themselves, with the encouragement and rewarding by the adults around them. They will also be mimicking these adults, who role model perpetration constantly as normal.
The child will be taught that this is the acceptable outlet for the aggressive impulses and rage that are created by the brutality the child is constantly being exposed to.
Fifth Lesson: the code of silence. Many, many different stratagems are used to put this in, starting at around the age of two years old, when a child starts becoming more verbal.
After a ritual or group gathering, you will be asked about what you saw, or heard, during the meeting. Like most obedient young children, you will comply. You are then immediately severely beaten, or tortured, and a new alter is created, who is told to keep or guard the memories of what was seen, on pain of their life. The new part always agrees. You and this new part are put through a ceremony of swearing to never ever tell; and alters are created whose job it is to kill the body, if the other parts ever remember. You will also be put through severe psychological torture to ensure that it will never be tempted to tell, including: being buried alive; near drowning; watching "traitor's deaths" involving slow painful torture, such as being burned, or skinned alive; being buried with a partially rotted corpse and being told that they will become a corpse like it if they ever tell, etc. The scenarios go on and on, invented by people with endlessly cruel imaginations, in order to ensure secrecy.
These methods have been perfected over hundreds of years of practice by the cult with its children. The reason these things are done is self evident: the cult is involved in criminal activities, as explained in the first few chapters of this book, and they want to ensure the continued silence of its children. This is one reason why the cult has survived so long, and with its continued shroud of secrecy; why more survivors are afraid/ unwilling to disclose their abuse. In order to reveal cult secrets, a child must go against some of the most tremendously horrendous psychological trauma and abuse imaginable; even as an adult, the survivor has difficulty putting these things aside, when discussing their abuse. Children and adults alike are told that if they ever tell, they will be hunted down and shot (the assassin training lets the child know that this is no idle threat); that they will be tortured slowly. The child will be exposed to setups and role plays throughout their growing up that reinforces this step
So, now that you've been indoctrinated and programmed, where do you go? What does your life look like? How do you get from here to there i.e. actually shooting up a school.
Military training is begun quite young. It is often started by three years of age with simple exercises. You will be taken by your parents to a training area, which may be a large inside auditorium, or a remote area outside where training maneuvers are done. Tents are set up, with command centers for the different commanding officers and military trainers. Looks something like this:https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/95pmjy/man_arrested_in_new_mexico_was_training_kids_to/ .
You will be taught to march in time, keeping a straight line. You will be punished by being kicked, shocked with a cattle prod, or beaten with a baton if you move out of place. You will be dressed in small uniforms in imitation of the adults. The adults will have ranks, badges and insignia indicating their level of achievement in the cult hierarchy and military. Badges and medals are given out to indicate the person's level of training and tests passed. Commanding officers are often brutal and will teach even the youngest children with harsh measures.
The children will be forced to march long distances, which increase as they get older, in any weather. They are forced to learn to cross obstacles. They will be given "fake" guns, with blanks, when they are young. These guns are perfect replicas of real guns, but fire blanks. The children are taught to load and fire all manner of firearms, both real and fake, under close adult supervision. They will spend hours learning to aim, sight, and fire these guns at targets. At first the targets are bulls eyes, but as the children get older the targets will be similar to police cut outs of humans. The children are taught to aim for the head or the heart. Later, they will graduate to realistic manikins. This is conditioning them to kill a human being. They will be shown violent films of warfare, much more explicit and graphic than normal movies in group classes. Killing techniques will be shown in slow motion. The motif "kill or be killed" will be ground in over and over. The trainer will ask the children what mistakes the people who were killed made. Being killed is considered weakness; being a killer is considered strength.
After you go through all of this you will be ready to live a normal life until you are called upon, often times without warning and without your knowledge. Good luck.
>>234677
If half of these guys had all this training, shootings would be a lot more deadly than they actually are.
Just my 2c
If half of these guys had all this training, shootings would be a lot more deadly than they actually are.
Just my 2c
File (): F0481480AAA8557FCA03206725B1FA9D-79796.jpg (77.9 KB, 643x820, allthatshit.jpg)
Anonymous
No.234755
>>234753
TLDR
>Glow Niggers raise, and mold assets before they are born to do their bidding.
>They tend to use cult tactics, abuse, and every psychological trick they have.
>They have gotten very good with repeated trials.
More, or less. They don't have safety in their own mind, and they don't even know.
>>234727
That's a good point. If they keep the best of the best as bodyguards, then they use the ones that failed (or don't met their standards, or don't even bother training these specific ones) as disposable pieces.
TLDR
>Glow Niggers raise, and mold assets before they are born to do their bidding.
>They tend to use cult tactics, abuse, and every psychological trick they have.
>They have gotten very good with repeated trials.
More, or less. They don't have safety in their own mind, and they don't even know.
>>234727
That's a good point. If they keep the best of the best as bodyguards, then they use the ones that failed (or don't met their standards, or don't even bother training these specific ones) as disposable pieces.
Oh boy.
First off, this entire post is a 1:1 copypaste of a Reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/cm17lo/the_process_of_becoming_an_mk_ultra_public_shooter/
Which means I have immediate doubts as to the poster's understanding of the contents, as they clearly invested no effort into even paraphrasing the information of the post.
But let's keep going, shall we?
You can tell immediately that the Redditor who made this has never had to write a scienfific paper in his entire life, something well explained by this juicy little paragraph:
>I will include links or references, I will not stop to explain who they are or what the links relate to. They are there for those that need another source, if they need it.
Which would be absolutely everyone.
>They are not in a particular order, or even directly relate to the sentence they follow.
Then what's the point of even having them?
>The post is designed to read fine without needing to click the links.
So it's meant for people who already believe this, and just want to shut off their brains and have everything they know reconfirmed.
Y'know, in most circles, this would be called 'confirmation bias'. But then again, this is r/conspiracy.
>These are simply some areas in which I learned similar information.
And right off of confirmation bias, we have source monitoring error. Why am I not surprised?
If you care to read more about this particularly nasty form of bias, this link will be of interest to you: https://memlab.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/2000_Mitchell_Johnson_SourceMonitoring.pdf
>I am tired of providing links in the comments for those who need evidence.
This actually becomes really funny if you imagine the thought process like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYcXSkLCK5M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36rKiXtTsTc
>I will do my best
No you didn't, and it's glaringly obvious that you didn't.
>but it is up to you to use search functions and to think for yourself.
Imagine having the nerve to say 'think for yourself' immediately after washing your hands of having to back up your claims with evidence.
Since this post is both unoriginal and clearly written to feed into confirmation bias, I'm not going to address any of the written content of it; instead, I'll be going over and verifying every provided link here.
>http://www.whale.to/b/pedophocracy.html
Appears to be a series of articles written by one David McGowan. The only info I could find on him was a WikiSpooks article. Barring that, the article itself is about the definitely suspect pedophile case of Marc Dutroux, but presupposes the perpetrator's involvement with other crimes, and then presupposes American involvement in the crimes, before derailing itself with more tangents than I care to keep track of. Add to that the author's personal connection to the subject matter (confirmation bias), and the end result is a page that's not terribly reliable.
>https://www.nytimes.com/1996/10/21/world/275000-in-belgium-protest-handling-of-child-sex-scandal.html
Fairly innocuous news article on the protests around Marx Dutroux's case. Obviously put in here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions. "Look, the protests are happening, so it must be a thing, maaan!"
>https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1991-05-17-9102140259-story.html
A witch hunt, a leftover of the 'repressed memory' moral panic of the 80's and 90's. This book can provide some insight onto the subject: https://bfms.org.uk/victims-of-memory/ Again, it's placement here is to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5oR2KsYEqY
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9__tMLGZUc
Unreliable testimony. Memory is easily manipulable and manufactured, exactly like a narrative. My source for this is the paper entitled "The Totalitarian Ego": https://www3.psych.purdue.edu/~willia55/392F/Greenwald.pdf
>https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9nq52e/mk_ultra_was_never_shut_down_just_renamed/
Links to https://imgur.com/YEbRvv6 : alleges MKULTRA was split into OFTEN for drug testing on animals and humans, and CHICKWIT for tracking down new types of drugs. But since this post can't even connect MKULTRA to school shooters, it's both irrelevant and once again here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB7gHCj8TZk&list=PL9p-kr1darp0F7uBATreNyqoADPei4lN_
I think the video description says it all: "I took the video down after hearing it was a publicity stunt of some kind, but I'm uploading it again here considering the loose connection to #Elsagate".
>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1037/h0079332
The pirate article is here: https://sci-hub.tw/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1037/h0079332 ; a paper written in the midst of the aforementioned 'repressed memory' moral panic, written to tug at heartstrings. Only here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol?gclid=Cj0KCQjwhJrqBRDZARIsALhp1WSTUQWK8VCmUXmZrPrfSd8SwgdypwUfk5d2Rart-WhlqiFh6H3ejvkaAiyiEALw_wcB
Article written on a site that already subscribes to the MKULTRA angle, so already we have confirmation bias concerns. Written like an adventure novel and an advertisement. It may be good info, but the unscientific tone immediately turned me off. Take with a grain of salt. But again, no connection to public shootings. Only here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-05-01-me-3161-story.html
Another article, this time about the 'satanic cult' moral panic. Further reading can be found in the books "Satan's Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt", and "Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony". Again, the writer is making a spurious and presupposed connection here. And again, this is only here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
At text limit. More coming soon, but this is a shitshow so far.
First off, this entire post is a 1:1 copypaste of a Reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/cm17lo/the_process_of_becoming_an_mk_ultra_public_shooter/
Which means I have immediate doubts as to the poster's understanding of the contents, as they clearly invested no effort into even paraphrasing the information of the post.
But let's keep going, shall we?
You can tell immediately that the Redditor who made this has never had to write a scienfific paper in his entire life, something well explained by this juicy little paragraph:
>I will include links or references, I will not stop to explain who they are or what the links relate to. They are there for those that need another source, if they need it.
Which would be absolutely everyone.
>They are not in a particular order, or even directly relate to the sentence they follow.
Then what's the point of even having them?
>The post is designed to read fine without needing to click the links.
So it's meant for people who already believe this, and just want to shut off their brains and have everything they know reconfirmed.
Y'know, in most circles, this would be called 'confirmation bias'. But then again, this is r/conspiracy.
>These are simply some areas in which I learned similar information.
And right off of confirmation bias, we have source monitoring error. Why am I not surprised?
If you care to read more about this particularly nasty form of bias, this link will be of interest to you: https://memlab.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/2000_Mitchell_Johnson_SourceMonitoring.pdf
>I am tired of providing links in the comments for those who need evidence.
This actually becomes really funny if you imagine the thought process like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYcXSkLCK5M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36rKiXtTsTc
>I will do my best
No you didn't, and it's glaringly obvious that you didn't.
>but it is up to you to use search functions and to think for yourself.
Imagine having the nerve to say 'think for yourself' immediately after washing your hands of having to back up your claims with evidence.
Since this post is both unoriginal and clearly written to feed into confirmation bias, I'm not going to address any of the written content of it; instead, I'll be going over and verifying every provided link here.
>http://www.whale.to/b/pedophocracy.html
Appears to be a series of articles written by one David McGowan. The only info I could find on him was a WikiSpooks article. Barring that, the article itself is about the definitely suspect pedophile case of Marc Dutroux, but presupposes the perpetrator's involvement with other crimes, and then presupposes American involvement in the crimes, before derailing itself with more tangents than I care to keep track of. Add to that the author's personal connection to the subject matter (confirmation bias), and the end result is a page that's not terribly reliable.
>https://www.nytimes.com/1996/10/21/world/275000-in-belgium-protest-handling-of-child-sex-scandal.html
Fairly innocuous news article on the protests around Marx Dutroux's case. Obviously put in here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions. "Look, the protests are happening, so it must be a thing, maaan!"
>https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1991-05-17-9102140259-story.html
A witch hunt, a leftover of the 'repressed memory' moral panic of the 80's and 90's. This book can provide some insight onto the subject: https://bfms.org.uk/victims-of-memory/ Again, it's placement here is to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5oR2KsYEqY
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9__tMLGZUc
Unreliable testimony. Memory is easily manipulable and manufactured, exactly like a narrative. My source for this is the paper entitled "The Totalitarian Ego": https://www3.psych.purdue.edu/~willia55/392F/Greenwald.pdf
>https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/9nq52e/mk_ultra_was_never_shut_down_just_renamed/
Links to https://imgur.com/YEbRvv6 : alleges MKULTRA was split into OFTEN for drug testing on animals and humans, and CHICKWIT for tracking down new types of drugs. But since this post can't even connect MKULTRA to school shooters, it's both irrelevant and once again here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB7gHCj8TZk&list=PL9p-kr1darp0F7uBATreNyqoADPei4lN_
I think the video description says it all: "I took the video down after hearing it was a publicity stunt of some kind, but I'm uploading it again here considering the loose connection to #Elsagate".
>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1037/h0079332
The pirate article is here: https://sci-hub.tw/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1037/h0079332 ; a paper written in the midst of the aforementioned 'repressed memory' moral panic, written to tug at heartstrings. Only here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol?gclid=Cj0KCQjwhJrqBRDZARIsALhp1WSTUQWK8VCmUXmZrPrfSd8SwgdypwUfk5d2Rart-WhlqiFh6H3ejvkaAiyiEALw_wcB
Article written on a site that already subscribes to the MKULTRA angle, so already we have confirmation bias concerns. Written like an adventure novel and an advertisement. It may be good info, but the unscientific tone immediately turned me off. Take with a grain of salt. But again, no connection to public shootings. Only here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-05-01-me-3161-story.html
Another article, this time about the 'satanic cult' moral panic. Further reading can be found in the books "Satan's Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt", and "Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony". Again, the writer is making a spurious and presupposed connection here. And again, this is only here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
At text limit. More coming soon, but this is a shitshow so far.
>>234762
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439425/
A scientific paper on PTSD and defence mechanisms. Honestly, I can't really find anything wrong with it. Good article. Again though, the people reading this post are already making the connections in ther heads, and it's presence here is to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/impromptu-man/201205/harvards-experiment-the-unabomber-class-62
According to this, the Unabomber took part in a Harvard experiment that was written about in a book the article's author also wrote: http://www.blpbooks.org/books/mind-wars/ I've no real interest in reading the book to verify this, nor does the article make any connection between the experiment and the Unabomber's later activities. Take with a grain of salt.
>https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/svali
An article from the same site mentioned before as already subscribing to the MKULTRA angle, so same confirmation bias concerns arise. Suffers from the same problem of unscientific tone and adventure novel writing style. The article itself states: "And though the Svali story fits what many serious researchers have found, it is difficult to verify." Since the article itself admits a difficulty in verifying it, I'm going to side with the article and thusly dismiss it. Only here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/a21qyt/when_reading_bush_sr_memorials_today_keep_in_mind/
I don't even know what this is supposed to be. A supposition of some kind? Not worth my effort either way.
>https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/dissociative-identity-disorder-multiple-personality-disorder#1
A fucking WebMD article, oh God have mercy on my soul.
WebMD meme derision aside, it's just high-level information on DID. Again, the presupposition of manufactured DID exists in r/conspiracy, so there's where your connections are forming. Only here to reaffirm said reader's presuppositions.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzPlo7PQcWI
Video description says: "Britney has a breakdown in her MK Ultra programming during a Diane Sawyer interview". If that isn't poisoning the well, I don't know what is. Only here to reaffirm the reader's presuppositions.
>https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/cfvskf/all_44_presidents_are_related_they_all_come_from/
Links to https://youtu.be/J4w0JgFfvD4 . Holy mother of suppositions, let alone the fallacy of composition. Even the comments on this Reddit post are sceptical of this one.
>https://www.nytimes.com/1987/02/08/us/inquiry-spreads-on-6-children-and-cult.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=17F417943110468351D14364275A5429&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALL
Let's ignore the Google referrer portion of this link, as much as I would like to jab at it.
Another cult case with a notable lack of information. Curious indeed. You already know where the connections are being formed in the heads of the r/conspiracy readers. Only here to reaffirm the reader's presuppositions.
>https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/svali_speaks_book.pdf
Provided by the same "WantToKnow" site, with all the same issues. Just the "about the author" and appendix sections alone tells me this is a monument to reaffirming one's biases. What kind of member of a 'sekrit Illuminati club' would be stupid enough to mention that she's a registered nurse in Texas, working as a diabetic educator? Let alone on the one site where this Illuminati would be watching like a hawk for any leaks? Apparently this "WantToKnow" site bought it all the same.
The rest of the post is copypasted from that "Svali Speaks" book I ended my link section on, chapter 4.
Frankly, I'm not sure who to be more annoyed with: the Redditor who Frankensteined this messy, incoherent mess of a post together, or the lazy hack who copypasted it here without ever stopping to verify it.
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439425/
A scientific paper on PTSD and defence mechanisms. Honestly, I can't really find anything wrong with it. Good article. Again though, the people reading this post are already making the connections in ther heads, and it's presence here is to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/impromptu-man/201205/harvards-experiment-the-unabomber-class-62
According to this, the Unabomber took part in a Harvard experiment that was written about in a book the article's author also wrote: http://www.blpbooks.org/books/mind-wars/ I've no real interest in reading the book to verify this, nor does the article make any connection between the experiment and the Unabomber's later activities. Take with a grain of salt.
>https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/svali
An article from the same site mentioned before as already subscribing to the MKULTRA angle, so same confirmation bias concerns arise. Suffers from the same problem of unscientific tone and adventure novel writing style. The article itself states: "And though the Svali story fits what many serious researchers have found, it is difficult to verify." Since the article itself admits a difficulty in verifying it, I'm going to side with the article and thusly dismiss it. Only here to reaffirm the reader's preconceptions.
>https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/a21qyt/when_reading_bush_sr_memorials_today_keep_in_mind/
I don't even know what this is supposed to be. A supposition of some kind? Not worth my effort either way.
>https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/dissociative-identity-disorder-multiple-personality-disorder#1
A fucking WebMD article, oh God have mercy on my soul.
WebMD meme derision aside, it's just high-level information on DID. Again, the presupposition of manufactured DID exists in r/conspiracy, so there's where your connections are forming. Only here to reaffirm said reader's presuppositions.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzPlo7PQcWI
Video description says: "Britney has a breakdown in her MK Ultra programming during a Diane Sawyer interview". If that isn't poisoning the well, I don't know what is. Only here to reaffirm the reader's presuppositions.
>https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/cfvskf/all_44_presidents_are_related_they_all_come_from/
Links to https://youtu.be/J4w0JgFfvD4 . Holy mother of suppositions, let alone the fallacy of composition. Even the comments on this Reddit post are sceptical of this one.
>https://www.nytimes.com/1987/02/08/us/inquiry-spreads-on-6-children-and-cult.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=17F417943110468351D14364275A5429&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALL
Let's ignore the Google referrer portion of this link, as much as I would like to jab at it.
Another cult case with a notable lack of information. Curious indeed. You already know where the connections are being formed in the heads of the r/conspiracy readers. Only here to reaffirm the reader's presuppositions.
>https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/svali_speaks_book.pdf
Provided by the same "WantToKnow" site, with all the same issues. Just the "about the author" and appendix sections alone tells me this is a monument to reaffirming one's biases. What kind of member of a 'sekrit Illuminati club' would be stupid enough to mention that she's a registered nurse in Texas, working as a diabetic educator? Let alone on the one site where this Illuminati would be watching like a hawk for any leaks? Apparently this "WantToKnow" site bought it all the same.
The rest of the post is copypasted from that "Svali Speaks" book I ended my link section on, chapter 4.
Frankly, I'm not sure who to be more annoyed with: the Redditor who Frankensteined this messy, incoherent mess of a post together, or the lazy hack who copypasted it here without ever stopping to verify it.
>>234762
Hey man, don't be so hard on that redditor. At least he isn't trying to turn everyone against posters he doesn't like any more.
Hey man, don't be so hard on that redditor. At least he isn't trying to turn everyone against posters he doesn't like any more.
Anonymous
No.234797
File (): 7569608D039D58F568780D26C63F42EF-21909.jpg (21.4 KB, 237x255, 1539868851468.jpg)
Anonymous
No.234923
Anonymous
No.235090
>>234677
I'm not fond of the media fictionalisation of the very, very, very real MK Ultra conspiracy; but at this point I wouldn't put it past the CIA to actually do this shit. The CIA is an evil organization that factually tried to brainwash unwilling Americans at one point in history. Their secrecy practically puts them above the law, and with no public oversight their "codes" are nothing more than mere suggestions to further their (((agenda))). They very well may be intentionally causing mass shootings for all we know.
I'm not fond of the media fictionalisation of the very, very, very real MK Ultra conspiracy; but at this point I wouldn't put it past the CIA to actually do this shit. The CIA is an evil organization that factually tried to brainwash unwilling Americans at one point in history. Their secrecy practically puts them above the law, and with no public oversight their "codes" are nothing more than mere suggestions to further their (((agenda))). They very well may be intentionally causing mass shootings for all we know.
Anonymous
No.235102
File (): 843E318524345D23475D1E4350B61602-995428.png (972.1 KB, 1546x4525, pizzagate-history-v6.png)
Are Manchurian candidates real, anon?
wondering if mods can re-enable IDs for threads by force if the topic warrants it
File (): 18FA1234A3763128D8C2D46B6E2F1CA7-43562.jpg (42.5 KB, 1200x800, 0E472226-9829-448B-85DD-4C3B69E2A4F7.jpeg)
>>234727
Perhaps the weapons training isn't necessary. You don't need precise shots to make a media splash: just walk in and spray bullets all over the place to cause as many casualties as possible.
As per why the Alphabet-bois would do something like
this, it's probably in their interest to agitate politics to take away Americans' gun rights; that way they can bring us closer to the high- surveillance police-state they crave.
I don't see any real proof for it, but I definitely wouldn't put it past the CIA to have done something similar at least once in American history, if not maybe in other countries.
>>235107
Idk, I wonder if there's any policies concerning that.
Perhaps the weapons training isn't necessary. You don't need precise shots to make a media splash: just walk in and spray bullets all over the place to cause as many casualties as possible.
As per why the Alphabet-bois would do something like
this, it's probably in their interest to agitate politics to take away Americans' gun rights; that way they can bring us closer to the high- surveillance police-state they crave.
I don't see any real proof for it, but I definitely wouldn't put it past the CIA to have done something similar at least once in American history, if not maybe in other countries.
>>235107
Idk, I wonder if there's any policies concerning that.
Anonymous
No.235119
>>235111
>Perhaps the weapons training isn't necessary. You don't need precise shots to make a media splash: just walk in and spray bullets all over the place to cause as many casualties as possible.
I was going to disagree with you, citing Randy Stair and that chick who shot up youtube HQ(with 0 deaths, other than herself). But then I realized that the fact that I heard about them at all supports your statement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNljIrmLvnM
>Perhaps the weapons training isn't necessary. You don't need precise shots to make a media splash: just walk in and spray bullets all over the place to cause as many casualties as possible.
I was going to disagree with you, citing Randy Stair and that chick who shot up youtube HQ(with 0 deaths, other than herself). But then I realized that the fact that I heard about them at all supports your statement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNljIrmLvnM
Anonymous
No.235216
File (): C8AA9E03D54BFD16D2536B8C0DEAB3EC-17042.jpg (16.6 KB, 318x303, 1547872605895.jpg)
>>235111
>Perhaps the weapons training isn't necessary
Checked
It would make sense, specially because it would be really suspicious if every shooting that takes place has pro-shooters that one hit everyone on the building.
Make it look rustic, emulate a few erros, sell it as a lunatic, it would make sense to use non-trained personnel indeed, specially if used as a pawn.
>Perhaps the weapons training isn't necessary
Checked
It would make sense, specially because it would be really suspicious if every shooting that takes place has pro-shooters that one hit everyone on the building.
Make it look rustic, emulate a few erros, sell it as a lunatic, it would make sense to use non-trained personnel indeed, specially if used as a pawn.
File (): 32F7AFFF3F9FF6DC5EEDD5623330F80F-528938.mp4 (516.5 KB, Resolution:320x320 Length:00:00:15, 6f796a084080533dcd8bfc840ba57943866407dc.mp4) [play once] [loop]
That's odd, is this stuff staged?
Anonymous
No.235230
Anonymous
No.235241
File (): 99E38979E8FD9613C03CD35332737739-181122.jpg (176.9 KB, 814x1057, 190691_1.jpg)
Allegedly you can only see the source of the document by ordering it from the CIA. If real it shows you can hypnotise someone to be a shooter.
https://www.wanttoknow.info/mind_control/foia_mind_control/190691_assassins_programmed_mind_control
TV demonstration of using hypnosis to make a shooter:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wipVDW3Vc4A
The Assassin: Shooting Stephen Fry
https://www.wanttoknow.info/mind_control/foia_mind_control/190691_assassins_programmed_mind_control
TV demonstration of using hypnosis to make a shooter:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wipVDW3Vc4A
The Assassin: Shooting Stephen Fry
Anonymous
No.242795
ssri's
Anonymous
No.242910
>>234677
It's a complicated process full of jewish techniques and high tech:
https://everydayconcerned.net/ti-station
https://www.targetedevidence.com
https://www.targetedjustice.com
It's a complicated process full of jewish techniques and high tech:
https://everydayconcerned.net/ti-station
https://www.targetedevidence.com
https://www.targetedjustice.com
Surprising how a video game managed to nail the insanity of today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_CBF318nBY
Reality has gone off the rails when stuff of fiction is now reality.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_CBF318nBY
Reality has gone off the rails when stuff of fiction is now reality.
Anonymous
No.242955
File (): 771629A9C85FDB864C23E00E54CA3FDF-32088.jpg (31.3 KB, 634x423, 31C976DC00000578-3473788-image-a-35_1456957826477.jpg)
>>242953
Rumour says: after terrorism is used up for making money, the next target will be Earth threatening asteroids, followed by "aliens". >>>/vx/44871 → Always keep in mind that in the 50's aliens looked human, then after Hollywood did special effects costumes they stopped looking human.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3473788/The-laser-weapon-save-Earth-asteroids-vapourise-space-rocks-2-million-miles-away.html
Almost everything produced is derived from something already existing. Therefore most art is about reality in some way.
Rumour says: after terrorism is used up for making money, the next target will be Earth threatening asteroids, followed by "aliens". >>>/vx/44871 → Always keep in mind that in the 50's aliens looked human, then after Hollywood did special effects costumes they stopped looking human.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3473788/The-laser-weapon-save-Earth-asteroids-vapourise-space-rocks-2-million-miles-away.html
Almost everything produced is derived from something already existing. Therefore most art is about reality in some way.
27 replies | 10 files | 17 UUIDs | Archived