That was me, so gib images to recolor
What about toll roads?
>>135505>Cracks knuckles>Accidentally breaks fingers
Alright I'll get on it
lmao I can't believe someone actually saved that
Saving it all. It is part of history. Found it in an dusty folder among the other Leslies while looking through some "old" stuff.>sometimes I think I save too much, but I'll never know because I never will have the time to sort through it all
Not without a mutually beneficial arrangement beforehand. This need not be strictly monetary; it could be a night out or even marriage.
Does she accept belly rubs as a form of payment?
Cute also nice digits, it means the time is coming so helicopter lesson sounds like a good idea
photoshop has gay
Alright, someone give me something to edit.
Edit Leslie Fair to be a "Landing pony" fucking Twilight's ass
Here are some you could do. >>138150
The text on Leslie's hat should say "Physical Removal" in my opinion.
kek I like this idea
Alright give me a minute
How much would she pay for me to not wake her?
Love the drawing. She looks so happy.
That's a nice nap she's taking there.
Hope nobody…VIOLATES IT
WOW! That is beautiful.
>You can do it you're the man>Unfinished Leslies violates NAP>P>O>L>A>N>D>Yaaaayyyyyyyyyy!
But seriously that drawing is awesome and deserves to be completed.
That's very nice from you. Although I gotta say that I'm having a lot of exams soon, therefore I need to be prepared for them.
Meanwhile have a shitty recolor I made in 5 minutes just for a Discord server emote.
Fully understandable, concentrate on the exams first. Thanks for the recolor, and I hope you will do well on the exams.
I'm using my meme status to demand you finish it.
AnCap is a meme ideology
I want to draw Futa Leslie Fair referring to her marecock as a "Recreational Nuke"
Is that cool?
That is fucking degenerate even for /mlpol/ Mohammed.
Shameful.A strap-on might be okay though.
Or r63, if he wants to draw dicks so badly
Question for ancaps: does planned obsolescence break the NAP? Why or why not?
Breaks the NAP only if the manufacturer forbids you from fixing your stuff or modifying in general (in USA Apple bribes senators and judges to lock up people who offer unauthorized repairs and stuff). But in general planned obsolence is a gay shit and no self-respecting company should practice that. Just boycott them.
This. Things can be scummy without being illegal, and still lose popularity in a market economy.
And fuck apple. Shitstains on the face of tech. $600 to repair the cable between the RAM and mohtherboard because muh lawgick bord!
Is using metadata to manipulate public opinion violating the NAP?
Might depend on how the metadata is obtained
AR-15's, assuming you don't count the McNukes tm.
Daily reminder to everypony that (((taxes))) are a punishment for working.
What would Leslie do if you told her she was a cute?
offer to have consensual private entertainment in her bedroom for a reasonable fee
Looks like she enjoys it, but don't know if it violates the NAP.>mind blown
That' pretty much what I was going for.>Anon? W-what are you doing?>Hey! You're violating the NAP! Don't touch->Oh.>Oh, wow>Okay, Anon, I'll let it slide this once.
What a cute little pony.
Cute PixelArt Leslie.
Redpill me on keynesian economics
the fourth row in the picture.
Oy oy oy, who is this nice fellow?
And the keynesian bubble?
That would be Murray Rothbard, one of the most important contributors to libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism of the 20th century.
Economic "bubbles" are caused when the Federal Reserve expands credit by inflating currency and lowering interest rates, to put it simply.
I really really really like this image.
Okay here is something that I do not understand. There was some talk of some respected economic fag and he said that it is fine if someone buys a steak and the seller uses the money to get a haircut and the barber uses the money to buy some logs … and basically the whole hive starts buzzing but there is there is a problem with competition and stuff.
Can someone dumb this down for me?
He must've used an oversimplified model to explain the situation.
I think she looks beautiful.
Excellent work, will save.
Yeah looks like a filly imho. But we didn't really have pics of her younger, so why not.
I like how her mane has a generally-rounded shape, like a memeball.
Yes. Filly or perhaps on the side of young adult going to graduation party.
how do you guys feel about cosplaying leslie?
I'll take whatever he's having
I don't have a suitable delet this that features Leslie.
Love it, love her
What happened to her hair?
I don't know, I didn't spend much time on the hair.
Wow, simply Wow, It looks Superb.
[gigaton recreational nuke]/10
NAP (No Anal Principle) Status: VIOLATED
I hope she managed to buy at least one recreational nuke before the crash.
At least she still has her gold and guns.
I love her expression.
Reminder that Ancaps aren't anarchists, because these is still violence inherent in the system through the use of a private police. Wake up sheeples
If protecting yourself is the same as unprovoked violence, then there's no way to be a statist even if you do your own security/policing. Fuck off with that big brain shit.
no way to avoid being*
Oops. But yeah, seriously, that's such a horribly broad way of defining violence and a state that it's hardly even capable of differentiating, well, any idea.
An honest question for any Ancaps who feel so inclined as to answer it: if a nation suddenly went full Ancap, what would happen to the public property owned by the former government?
A fair question; transitioning would likely either be slow or sloppy. I would think government programs, licenses, and other things could/should be shrunk down to nothing over time or nullified by the removal of infrastructure. Ownership of pulbic roads could either be left public in the same fashion un-claimed land used to be, or demolished/renovated depending on how much space or resource is used on it. They could also be bought or auctioned to the highest bidder if things go the diplomatic/gradual route.
I'm no expert on the topic of transitioning into ancapistan or really an ancap
but those seem like moderately reasonable courses of action to take.
Beautiful, love it.
>>192212>Lewd ponies with candy canes
Oh boy! It's that time of year again.
Let's be honest, we would find some other excuse to lewd ponies with phallic object.
I start to lean towards ancap
I can provide you with some entry-level books on anarcho-capitalism if you want.
I may have a couple thousand pages to study but that wont stop me from learning more about how the world works instead of being part of the pack that destroys it
So please go ahead
On a different matter: what does an ancap think about the natsoc world view ?
The official definition of natsoc and fash in my country
is evil so I am still trying to learn
Attached are three books which might help you understand anarcho-capitalism a bit better. The first is one of the earliest works written on the idea of governance not based in coercion, and it was written in the 19th century by the French economist Gustave de Molinari. I would also recommend The Law by Frederic Bastiat, a friend of Molinari who was very influential in libertarianism. I have also attached two articles by Murray Rothbard, a 20th century American author who is ethnically Jewish but strongly criticized Israel, cultural Marxism, and banks during his life. The first deals with monetary policy and the second reconciles libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism with nationalism.>what does an ancap think about the natsoc world view ?
It will vary from one ancap to another. Many will dismiss natsoc/fascism as just another "evil collectivist statist idealogy", but personally, I don't mind working with NatSocs against our common enemies.
>>192233>but personally, I don't mind working with NatSocs against our common enemies
As a National Socialist, I share this sentiment. We can wait to iron out the details of our state/non-state until AFTER the DotR.
thank you for sharing
Would you mind explaining the differences from your POW
>>192244>that typo, tho
Many Ancaps can bring great arguments and points to debates, and are fairly even-keeled. Though I've viewed the ideology mostly as overly-optimistic, self-centered, and entitled. To explain all three in a little more detail:>overly-optimistic
I've seen a lot of Ancaps place emphasis on the inherent good of mankind, and that when one is allowed to achieve his fullest unhindered and unburdened by intervention by a governmental institution, his efforts to improve his own standing in life will come also as a benefit to the community. I wish it was like that, but I've had too many experiences with people both as a collective and individually to believe in that.>self-centered
Somewhat of an addition to the last point. Anarcho-Capitalism's obsession with individual enterprise seems selfish to me at times. That it treats those who don't succeed, whether it was within their power to do so or not, as 100% at fault for their own shortcomings. And that, when one has the option of helping themselves become very wealthy or helping those around them to being a little wealthy, it is always in a person's best interest to take the former.>entitled
I lot of the ideology, I think, can be boiled down with a metaphor: it's like wanting to stay at a 3-star luxury resort with all of the perks staying at such a luxurious place entails, and then complaining when the owner of the resort hands you the bill. It promotes getting all of the benefits of living in a civilized, 1st-world country without paying anything to those running the country to help them actually maintain it all.
I might be completely wrong on all points, and I fully expect for it to be pointed out by someone, but that's just my two-cents from listening to Ancap talking points.
Maybe you're right, to a certain extent. That's why I believe that a high-trust community, which would most likely be homogenous and definitely with a high degree of cultural cohesion, is an important prerequisite to founding and maintaining a libertarian society. It reminds me of the quote from one of the founding fathers, I think Washington or Jefferson, about how a free society must be a virtuous one too. This point also reminds me of something Bastiat said, "Do not legislators and agents belong to mankind? Or do they believe themselves made of a finer clay?" His point being that if man is by his nature bad then then mustn't state, consisting of men, also be bad?>self-centered
Many anarcho-capitalists do seem a bit too individualistic, turning their nose at any show of concern for the tribe. Really, the only sort of individualism that is necessary for liberty is legal individualism, the idea that each agent has total authority over how their property is used, including selling or destroying it, with the exception being that a person can not sell their own bodies, only rent them for labor.>entitled
The difference is that with a hotel there is competition, and no coercion. If someone in a libertarian society found that the prices they were being charged by their protection firm for ensuring their house was safe from burglary were too high, they would have the option to seek a different provider, ask the firm to reduce its price to a more tolerable level, or forego the service. And if a hotel company forced you to stay at their hotel and shut down all nearby competitors, and then charged you the price it saw fitting, would you be an ingrate to resent them?
One could argue there is also competition between countries for immigrants, especially if you're an upstanding person with skills that would be valuable to the nation. One could also argue that you aren't forced to stay in one nation. Unless you live in a totalitarian state with completely closed borders in both directions, you are free to leave whenever you wish, provided you have a mode of transportation out of the country.
I've met based ancaps and cucked ancaps and it really depends on how redpilled they are about the social condition of society. I personally am leaning towards (paradoxically) "anarcho-fascism," which isn't a real ideology. I feel that anarcho-capitalism is objectively correct on economic and long-term political matters but needs to be melded with the understanding of social cohesion from fascism.>>192240
I believe that open dialogue and pairing of philosophies is necessary to have an agreed-upon worldview ready for the DotR. The problem is that ancaps (and libertarians in general) don't want to be any more socially unacceptable than they already are and scare away their niche audience, while many fascists believe capitalism is a Jewish invention. Therefore it's nigh-impossible to have prominent thinkers other than some e-celebs conduct an honest discussion.>>192251
Anarcho-capitalists believe societies organize organically as they have for thousands of years; state interventions are the exception rather than the rule and tend to cause one or more major flaws. Society obviously won't be perfect and individuals definitely aren't perfect but as an aggregate they will behave more rationally than conscious planning.
Also, the free-market system probably exercises more natural selection than any other system. Obviously individual merit isn't 100% responsible for performance but even other indicators are affected by natural selection. Since the Agricultural Revolution society has looked down upon single motherhood because, besides sexual impurity, it implies economic hardship and poorer performance from offspring. When the government provided free handouts single motherhood exploded and now it is no longer such a taboo. We like to make fun of blacks for this propensity but the truth is before the "Great Society" they generally had more-or-less functioning families.
To keep up the hotel metaphor, government is essentially forcing you to stay at a 3-star luxury resort with the price of a 5-star resort and terrible service. Anarcho-capitalists want the freedom to shop around for resorts and pick the one that best fits their needs and budget.>>192286>immigration
Probably a poor argument to use with a NatSoc tbh. To clarify, in an ancap society the only ways to immigrate would be to purchase property (from someone who is willing to sell to you) or be sponsored by someone who would pick up all the costs you impose on his neighbors. Society would also be perfectly free to discriminate against you as long as they do not harm you physically.
Merry Christmas Leslie
It is really a tough thing.
Ancap has really good points, the science makes sense but theories are just theories.
The most important thing is that it stands for freedom. I don't like to be told what to think.
The natsoc ideology has the strong point of living like an athlete and working for the people, strife and self -sacrifice.
It is hart to choose really
Why we don't make an alliance to bring the establishment down and any of their zombies both left and right, until that, they'll not allow us to achieve anything worth the effort.
The only problem is that was essentially the Alt-Right was and we never got anywhere politically due to counter-signalling and a general disagreement on strategies and goals. Adolf Hitler said that political alliances are always harmful and it is better for a movement to go it alone due to these reasons. I believe that anarcho-capitalism and national-socialism are each presently insufficient alternatives and we need to create a new ideology based on everything we've learned.
Can't we side both part of the left and right understanding that the whole global establishment is fucked, that they're just playing by hijacking the group that best fits them in a determined moment? That's just my idea it might just be stupid but after seeing Antifa and Identity Evropa side by side with the yellow vest thing, sound kind of possible. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QZHa7WdWbaU
Any anons have Leslie-related ideas they want drawn?
Something with Flim and/or Flam, please. Cuddling, courting, scheming, arguing, anything you think will look good.>>195979
I want Leslie throwing alunya (/leftypol/'s cat girl) out of a helicopter.
Stunningly beautiful and serene drawing of Leslie.
What about cartells?
What do you mean?
They fuck with the free market and cause large damage.
What can you do about them in an ancap nation?
I have heard that they will eventually fall because of reasons. What are these reasons?
That's not on the list of things I was expecting to see today. Would fuck.
Thank you for your explaination.
Lately I read up on the damage they do and how hard it is toll bust them.
In theory your explaination makes sense but I wonder. After all they are setting up a position of power and will try to defend it with all means necessary.
If there are hundreds of millions at stake they won't shy away from manipulation and murder.
Happy Hearts and Hooves Day Leslie.
the virgin contentless bump
The Chad blankpost
Awesome. We can never have enough Leslie's.
I strongly approve of this post.
i dont have a high opinion of Moonatik, hes a communist from finland and draws all kinds of degenerate shit for money, including detractor content. >>210796
looks really good. Avowed.
- only tax payers vote
- rules of debate in goverment
- longer presidential term
- petition statted referendi can change politics/remove politicians
- state: military, basic law, printing of money, courts, laws of contract
- solidarity program if you are sol
- if your company is a monopoly, you can be instructed by the goverment, until a competitor arises.
- children, mothers of young children, pregnant women and the elderly can get special care.
- veterans have a lower voting hurdle.
- possibly a monarch with veto right only.
- basic health and environmental program
- propaganda for solidarity and self improvement and against slave or king morality
- the rest is hands of
- strong boarders
- absolute free speech
- right of defense for you and kin
- everybody can sell stuff (declare your buisness if you want to vote).
- no value added tax, but transaction tax (prevents to risky financial markket behavior, funds the small goverment)
- full reserve banking, speculation on your acvount is voluntary
- no bans on home production, home selling, own repair, etc.
- for the people that are inherently herd animals: simple trad/fururism propaganda.
- nobody cares for your delusion of gender, but you do you. if you harm our children, you are dead.
- imigration by merrit and strive. asylum for those who know how to behave.
- healthy patriotism
- tolerance, but with limits
-Only good as transition to ancap.
the minimal state is a voluntary institution to unify laws and border security. it is also there to give the people a headstart in preventing monopolistic takeovers or socialist subversion.
The early United States were minarchist. Any government (de facto
a monopoly) is bound to find excuses and loopholes to expand its jurisdiction, either slowly or rapidly. It's the biggest Jew there is.
- let only net tax payers vote: its their money, so they want the gouverment to be small
- rules of debate are always helpfull
- anchor the minarchist elements in the constitution
- give the voters the ability to start referendi
The system is only as good as the culture. The expansion of government could not have happened without the Progressive Movement which saw intervention as the solution to every problem.
It doesn't matter how you structure a government; as long as the people are comfortable with its existence then eventually a very vocal group will want to expand it. It doesn't matter how they word the constitution, they'll use the "living document" BS and use referendi to their advantage. Also guilt/self-satisfaction can overpower self-interest; well-to-do whites tend to be the most socialist.
Rejecting Enlightenment principles and returning to tradition as a guideline for society is key.
[Last 50 Posts]
Awesome. Looks like she is having a really satisfying time.