>>192212>Lewd ponies with candy canes
Oh boy! It's that time of year again.
Let's be honest, we would find some other excuse to lewd ponies with phallic object.
I start to lean towards ancap
I can provide you with some entry-level books on anarcho-capitalism if you want.
I may have a couple thousand pages to study but that wont stop me from learning more about how the world works instead of being part of the pack that destroys it
So please go ahead
On a different matter: what does an ancap think about the natsoc world view ?
The official definition of natsoc and fash in my country
is evil so I am still trying to learn
Attached are three books which might help you understand anarcho-capitalism a bit better. The first is one of the earliest works written on the idea of governance not based in coercion, and it was written in the 19th century by the French economist Gustave de Molinari. I would also recommend The Law by Frederic Bastiat, a friend of Molinari who was very influential in libertarianism. I have also attached two articles by Murray Rothbard, a 20th century American author who is ethnically Jewish but strongly criticized Israel, cultural Marxism, and banks during his life. The first deals with monetary policy and the second reconciles libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism with nationalism.>what does an ancap think about the natsoc world view ?
It will vary from one ancap to another. Many will dismiss natsoc/fascism as just another "evil collectivist statist idealogy", but personally, I don't mind working with NatSocs against our common enemies.
>>192233>but personally, I don't mind working with NatSocs against our common enemies
As a National Socialist, I share this sentiment. We can wait to iron out the details of our state/non-state until AFTER the DotR.
thank you for sharing
Would you mind explaining the differences from your POW
>>192244>that typo, tho
Many Ancaps can bring great arguments and points to debates, and are fairly even-keeled. Though I've viewed the ideology mostly as overly-optimistic, self-centered, and entitled. To explain all three in a little more detail:>overly-optimistic
I've seen a lot of Ancaps place emphasis on the inherent good of mankind, and that when one is allowed to achieve his fullest unhindered and unburdened by intervention by a governmental institution, his efforts to improve his own standing in life will come also as a benefit to the community. I wish it was like that, but I've had too many experiences with people both as a collective and individually to believe in that.>self-centered
Somewhat of an addition to the last point. Anarcho-Capitalism's obsession with individual enterprise seems selfish to me at times. That it treats those who don't succeed, whether it was within their power to do so or not, as 100% at fault for their own shortcomings. And that, when one has the option of helping themselves become very wealthy or helping those around them to being a little wealthy, it is always in a person's best interest to take the former.>entitled
I lot of the ideology, I think, can be boiled down with a metaphor: it's like wanting to stay at a 3-star luxury resort with all of the perks staying at such a luxurious place entails, and then complaining when the owner of the resort hands you the bill. It promotes getting all of the benefits of living in a civilized, 1st-world country without paying anything to those running the country to help them actually maintain it all.
I might be completely wrong on all points, and I fully expect for it to be pointed out by someone, but that's just my two-cents from listening to Ancap talking points.
Maybe you're right, to a certain extent. That's why I believe that a high-trust community, which would most likely be homogenous and definitely with a high degree of cultural cohesion, is an important prerequisite to founding and maintaining a libertarian society. It reminds me of the quote from one of the founding fathers, I think Washington or Jefferson, about how a free society must be a virtuous one too. This point also reminds me of something Bastiat said, "Do not legislators and agents belong to mankind? Or do they believe themselves made of a finer clay?" His point being that if man is by his nature bad then then mustn't state, consisting of men, also be bad?>self-centered
Many anarcho-capitalists do seem a bit too individualistic, turning their nose at any show of concern for the tribe. Really, the only sort of individualism that is necessary for liberty is legal individualism, the idea that each agent has total authority over how their property is used, including selling or destroying it, with the exception being that a person can not sell their own bodies, only rent them for labor.>entitled
The difference is that with a hotel there is competition, and no coercion. If someone in a libertarian society found that the prices they were being charged by their protection firm for ensuring their house was safe from burglary were too high, they would have the option to seek a different provider, ask the firm to reduce its price to a more tolerable level, or forego the service. And if a hotel company forced you to stay at their hotel and shut down all nearby competitors, and then charged you the price it saw fitting, would you be an ingrate to resent them?
One could argue there is also competition between countries for immigrants, especially if you're an upstanding person with skills that would be valuable to the nation. One could also argue that you aren't forced to stay in one nation. Unless you live in a totalitarian state with completely closed borders in both directions, you are free to leave whenever you wish, provided you have a mode of transportation out of the country.
I've met based ancaps and cucked ancaps and it really depends on how redpilled they are about the social condition of society. I personally am leaning towards (paradoxically) "anarcho-fascism," which isn't a real ideology. I feel that anarcho-capitalism is objectively correct on economic and long-term political matters but needs to be melded with the understanding of social cohesion from fascism.>>192240
I believe that open dialogue and pairing of philosophies is necessary to have an agreed-upon worldview ready for the DotR. The problem is that ancaps (and libertarians in general) don't want to be any more socially unacceptable than they already are and scare away their niche audience, while many fascists believe capitalism is a Jewish invention. Therefore it's nigh-impossible to have prominent thinkers other than some e-celebs conduct an honest discussion.>>192251
Anarcho-capitalists believe societies organize organically as they have for thousands of years; state interventions are the exception rather than the rule and tend to cause one or more major flaws. Society obviously won't be perfect and individuals definitely aren't perfect but as an aggregate they will behave more rationally than conscious planning.
Also, the free-market system probably exercises more natural selection than any other system. Obviously individual merit isn't 100% responsible for performance but even other indicators are affected by natural selection. Since the Agricultural Revolution society has looked down upon single motherhood because, besides sexual impurity, it implies economic hardship and poorer performance from offspring. When the government provided free handouts single motherhood exploded and now it is no longer such a taboo. We like to make fun of blacks for this propensity but the truth is before the "Great Society" they generally had more-or-less functioning families.
To keep up the hotel metaphor, government is essentially forcing you to stay at a 3-star luxury resort with the price of a 5-star resort and terrible service. Anarcho-capitalists want the freedom to shop around for resorts and pick the one that best fits their needs and budget.>>192286>immigration
Probably a poor argument to use with a NatSoc tbh. To clarify, in an ancap society the only ways to immigrate would be to purchase property (from someone who is willing to sell to you) or be sponsored by someone who would pick up all the costs you impose on his neighbors. Society would also be perfectly free to discriminate against you as long as they do not harm you physically.
Merry Christmas Leslie
It is really a tough thing.
Ancap has really good points, the science makes sense but theories are just theories.
The most important thing is that it stands for freedom. I don't like to be told what to think.
The natsoc ideology has the strong point of living like an athlete and working for the people, strife and self -sacrifice.
It is hart to choose really
Why we don't make an alliance to bring the establishment down and any of their zombies both left and right, until that, they'll not allow us to achieve anything worth the effort.
The only problem is that was essentially the Alt-Right was and we never got anywhere politically due to counter-signalling and a general disagreement on strategies and goals. Adolf Hitler said that political alliances are always harmful and it is better for a movement to go it alone due to these reasons. I believe that anarcho-capitalism and national-socialism are each presently insufficient alternatives and we need to create a new ideology based on everything we've learned.
Can't we side both part of the left and right understanding that the whole global establishment is fucked, that they're just playing by hijacking the group that best fits them in a determined moment? That's just my idea it might just be stupid but after seeing Antifa and Identity Evropa side by side with the yellow vest thing, sound kind of possible. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QZHa7WdWbaU
Any anons have Leslie-related ideas they want drawn?
Something with Flim and/or Flam, please. Cuddling, courting, scheming, arguing, anything you think will look good.>>195979
I want Leslie throwing alunya (/leftypol/'s cat girl) out of a helicopter.
Stunningly beautiful and serene drawing of Leslie.
What about cartells?
What do you mean?
They fuck with the free market and cause large damage.
What can you do about them in an ancap nation?
I have heard that they will eventually fall because of reasons. What are these reasons?
That's not on the list of things I was expecting to see today. Would fuck.
Thank you for your explaination.
Lately I read up on the damage they do and how hard it is toll bust them.
In theory your explaination makes sense but I wonder. After all they are setting up a position of power and will try to defend it with all means necessary.
If there are hundreds of millions at stake they won't shy away from manipulation and murder.
Happy Hearts and Hooves Day Leslie.
the virgin contentless bump
The Chad blankpost
Awesome. We can never have enough Leslie's.
I strongly approve of this post.
[View All] (174 posts and 117 image replies omitted)
i dont have a high opinion of Moonatik, hes a communist from finland and draws all kinds of degenerate shit for money, including detractor content. >>210796
looks really good. Avowed.