Anons, divided we are weak and helpless, but if we come together and start building our own communities then we can be strong. We need to start building communities and becoming less dependent on the globohomo system. These communities should be located in the Pacific North West (Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Western Montana). These states have plenty of jobs and housing for new immigrants and outside of a few cities they are majority white. If we can network with each other and build our own system we can start taking action in meat space. We can start bringing others to our cause. The Pacific North West is our best shot at making a difference.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 909A9B230BAB718FCB68A5157555341C-165481.jpg (161.6 KB, 1712x1060, 778748_164047517077861_816807851_o.jpg)
File (): 89A86AC6614A4551267687AC70D209B0-3163659.png (3.0 MB, 1600x900, BloodAndSoil.png)
1) nor/mlpol/ice contacted NSW organizers before and they've repudiated us for being "degenerate" (gotta admit, they aren't completely wrong
2) I've never understood the point of the northwest. Firstly, they may be "majority white" but Oregon and Washington is ruled by the coast which is completely cucked. One option is to simply exclude the cosmopolitan coast from plans of secession but advocates don't want to be landlocked. The only other option is to change these coastal areas by moving to them but that's incredibly difficult and what's emphasized anyway is moving to the most sparsely populated areas. Even if you succeed in getting Idaho, Montana, and eastern Oregon/Washington to be more or less aligned you'd still wind up with the coast in political power, forcing you either to break off from them or launch an offensive war.
The south-east is actually preferable despite the large numbers of blacks. This is due to an actually based and nationalistic white culture which is sympathetic to secession, a population dense enough to sustain a true fighting force, and a much more powerful and growing industrial base. There are three obstacles: a few somewhat left-leaning large cities, large numbers of refugees from the North East, and a large population of non-whites. However, it is not nearly as bad as taking on the whole coast in the north-west plan, and it may be possible to carve out a black ethnostate if a Malcolm X-figure is supported. Deo vindice!
2) I've never understood the point of the northwest. Firstly, they may be "majority white" but Oregon and Washington is ruled by the coast which is completely cucked. One option is to simply exclude the cosmopolitan coast from plans of secession but advocates don't want to be landlocked. The only other option is to change these coastal areas by moving to them but that's incredibly difficult and what's emphasized anyway is moving to the most sparsely populated areas. Even if you succeed in getting Idaho, Montana, and eastern Oregon/Washington to be more or less aligned you'd still wind up with the coast in political power, forcing you either to break off from them or launch an offensive war.
The south-east is actually preferable despite the large numbers of blacks. This is due to an actually based and nationalistic white culture which is sympathetic to secession, a population dense enough to sustain a true fighting force, and a much more powerful and growing industrial base. There are three obstacles: a few somewhat left-leaning large cities, large numbers of refugees from the North East, and a large population of non-whites. However, it is not nearly as bad as taking on the whole coast in the north-west plan, and it may be possible to carve out a black ethnostate if a Malcolm X-figure is supported. Deo vindice!
>>241205
>Firstly, they may be "majority white" but Oregon and Washington is ruled by the coast which is completely cucked.
You really think they will be a threat during boogaloo?
>Firstly, they may be "majority white" but Oregon and Washington is ruled by the coast which is completely cucked.
You really think they will be a threat during boogaloo?
>nor/mlpol/ice contacted NSW organizers before and they've repudiated us for being "degenerate"
We don't have to join any other organizations. We could just make our own group.
We don't have to join any other organizations. We could just make our own group.
>>241198
>cutting Montana in half
Not a good idea. Thats a ton of precious grassland that can be used for farming cows and wheat.
>cutting Montana in half
Not a good idea. Thats a ton of precious grassland that can be used for farming cows and wheat.
>>241318
Redshirts in South Carolina managed to win back political power and cow black Republicans into submission with one skirmish. You want to run away from a group that doesn't even outnumber you despite your ancestors fighting against far larger groups with alacrity. You dishonor their memory.*
*I am not advocating violence against any ethnic group. /mlpol/ is a board of peace.
Redshirts in South Carolina managed to win back political power and cow black Republicans into submission with one skirmish. You want to run away from a group that doesn't even outnumber you despite your ancestors fighting against far larger groups with alacrity. You dishonor their memory.*
*I am not advocating violence against any ethnic group. /mlpol/ is a board of peace.
>>241323
The goal is to ensure whites get a slice of the pie when America balkanizes. We can take back the rest after we secure the 14 words.
The goal is to ensure whites get a slice of the pie when America balkanizes. We can take back the rest after we secure the 14 words.
>>241373
I think replacing Washington with Wyoming is a better start. Taking on Washington at first would be extremely difficult.
I think replacing Washington with Wyoming is a better start. Taking on Washington at first would be extremely difficult.
File (): 78AFB675B313A65E96B2F015684C3EF3-2032606.png (1.9 MB, 3638x2820, efnw-bye.png)
>>241198
>>241373
I basically agree with the idea, but I think the most common objection is to the choice of location. I live in the NW area already and I don't consider it to be an ideal location for building a white ethnostate. The entire I5 corridor is virtually uninhabitable at this point; you might as well live in California. The entire Seattle-Tacoma region is pretty much a third world country and the Portland area is well on its way. Real estate is also prohibitively expensive for the average person. I have a good job and make good money, and I still had to move to a far-flung exurb just to find a decently priced rental. Home ownership is out of the question for most people; even a shitty house is going to cost you at least 300k. The average is around 400-500k. I'm currently working on transferring out of here to a more reasonable area.
Seems to me the same basic idea would work just as well in a more practical and white-friendly region of the country. It's true that the region has a large white population, but that isn't enough, you need the right kind of whites. I'd frankly rather live around conservative Hispanics than most of the SJW hipster whites in Portland/Seattle. It's also worth noting that thanks to liberal government and sanctuary city policies, the demographics are changing just as rapidly here as they are anywhere else. All in all, I don't see what makes the NW any more ideal for a project like this than other, imo more promising, areas. The South has been suggested which I think makes sense, despite the large black population. My personal suggestion would be the Midwest. Nebraska, the Dakotas, Iowa, Indiana, Oklahoma, Kansas, anywhere in that region really. The population is mostly white, mostly conservative, there's plenty of arable land, and houses are cheap. Alternatively, we could all just move to Texas and try to boost their demographics, since it's basically the last significant conservative powerhouse in the country and if their electoral votes go blue we're all fucked. The NW is geographically pretty, but it's also the tech-and-soyboy capital of the US right now, and the government is in the hands of leftists like Kate Brown; it really seems like an odd choice of location for a white nationalist project to base itself.
I also think NWF is doomed to fail so long as it doesn't have any sort of practical economic network behind it. I've read through some of your literature, and you specifically mention that you don't offer any means of financial assistance for whites who don't have the resources to just pack up and move. I'm not saying you should offer free money or anything that would attract the wrong sort of people, but at the very least you need to take practical concerns into account. You want all the race-conscious whites in America to move to the NW; okay fine, but what are they all supposed to do once they get here? Where do they live, where do they work? Your answer is basically that they're on their own to find work and take care of their own housing and accommodation, same if they decided to move anywhere, including places that make a lot more sense for their given situation. If you had something like, say, a network of businesses in the NW associated with your group, that people could plug into to secure jobs and housing beforehand and then move, you'd have something viable. As it stands, your "plan" is basically to just tell people to move to one of the most expensive and liberal regions of the country, and just sit around twiddling their thumbs waiting for eventual balkanization to happen. That's not really much of a plan. Collapse and balkanization is probably inevitable at this point, but it could still take another two or three generations or more to get there. People have to pay their bills and live their lives in the meantime, and if we want people having families and making white babies it makes a lot more sense to move to a place where there's decently-priced housing and good job opportunities. Unless you're highly educated and can land a job paying 100k per year or more, most of the NW just doesn't add up.
Autistic hobbies aside, I'm basically a functional adult with a good job and a decent credit score, and I consider my future prospects in this region of the country to be pretty dim. As soon as I can find a viable path out, I'm taking it. For some NEET chan-user who's just trying to find an escape from his parents' basement, moving to the NW makes about as much sense as moving to New York or California, and I couldn't in good conscience recommend it to him. As with all white nationalist movements, I wish yours the best of luck in its future endeavors and genuinely hope for your success, but I think you've got a lot of work ahead of you.
>>241373
I basically agree with the idea, but I think the most common objection is to the choice of location. I live in the NW area already and I don't consider it to be an ideal location for building a white ethnostate. The entire I5 corridor is virtually uninhabitable at this point; you might as well live in California. The entire Seattle-Tacoma region is pretty much a third world country and the Portland area is well on its way. Real estate is also prohibitively expensive for the average person. I have a good job and make good money, and I still had to move to a far-flung exurb just to find a decently priced rental. Home ownership is out of the question for most people; even a shitty house is going to cost you at least 300k. The average is around 400-500k. I'm currently working on transferring out of here to a more reasonable area.
Seems to me the same basic idea would work just as well in a more practical and white-friendly region of the country. It's true that the region has a large white population, but that isn't enough, you need the right kind of whites. I'd frankly rather live around conservative Hispanics than most of the SJW hipster whites in Portland/Seattle. It's also worth noting that thanks to liberal government and sanctuary city policies, the demographics are changing just as rapidly here as they are anywhere else. All in all, I don't see what makes the NW any more ideal for a project like this than other, imo more promising, areas. The South has been suggested which I think makes sense, despite the large black population. My personal suggestion would be the Midwest. Nebraska, the Dakotas, Iowa, Indiana, Oklahoma, Kansas, anywhere in that region really. The population is mostly white, mostly conservative, there's plenty of arable land, and houses are cheap. Alternatively, we could all just move to Texas and try to boost their demographics, since it's basically the last significant conservative powerhouse in the country and if their electoral votes go blue we're all fucked. The NW is geographically pretty, but it's also the tech-and-soyboy capital of the US right now, and the government is in the hands of leftists like Kate Brown; it really seems like an odd choice of location for a white nationalist project to base itself.
I also think NWF is doomed to fail so long as it doesn't have any sort of practical economic network behind it. I've read through some of your literature, and you specifically mention that you don't offer any means of financial assistance for whites who don't have the resources to just pack up and move. I'm not saying you should offer free money or anything that would attract the wrong sort of people, but at the very least you need to take practical concerns into account. You want all the race-conscious whites in America to move to the NW; okay fine, but what are they all supposed to do once they get here? Where do they live, where do they work? Your answer is basically that they're on their own to find work and take care of their own housing and accommodation, same if they decided to move anywhere, including places that make a lot more sense for their given situation. If you had something like, say, a network of businesses in the NW associated with your group, that people could plug into to secure jobs and housing beforehand and then move, you'd have something viable. As it stands, your "plan" is basically to just tell people to move to one of the most expensive and liberal regions of the country, and just sit around twiddling their thumbs waiting for eventual balkanization to happen. That's not really much of a plan. Collapse and balkanization is probably inevitable at this point, but it could still take another two or three generations or more to get there. People have to pay their bills and live their lives in the meantime, and if we want people having families and making white babies it makes a lot more sense to move to a place where there's decently-priced housing and good job opportunities. Unless you're highly educated and can land a job paying 100k per year or more, most of the NW just doesn't add up.
Autistic hobbies aside, I'm basically a functional adult with a good job and a decent credit score, and I consider my future prospects in this region of the country to be pretty dim. As soon as I can find a viable path out, I'm taking it. For some NEET chan-user who's just trying to find an escape from his parents' basement, moving to the NW makes about as much sense as moving to New York or California, and I couldn't in good conscience recommend it to him. As with all white nationalist movements, I wish yours the best of luck in its future endeavors and genuinely hope for your success, but I think you've got a lot of work ahead of you.
>>241683
>You want all the race-conscious whites in America to move to the NW; okay fine, but what are they all supposed to do once they get here? Where do they live, where do they work?
We need to network with other racially aware whites to find places to live and work. Ideally those with the means to start businesses or homesteads could invite other whites to work and live with them.
>You want all the race-conscious whites in America to move to the NW; okay fine, but what are they all supposed to do once they get here? Where do they live, where do they work?
We need to network with other racially aware whites to find places to live and work. Ideally those with the means to start businesses or homesteads could invite other whites to work and live with them.
>>241689
That's basically what I was getting at. If I can offer I suggestion, I think you should direct more energy to creating an organized network that provides people with a practical means of getting out to the NW (ideally the rural NW for the reasons I stated in my previous post) as well as giving them a community and a reason to stay, as opposed to just posting "come to the northwest white people, you'll like it here" all over chanboards, which is mostly what I've seen you guys do.
That's basically what I was getting at. If I can offer I suggestion, I think you should direct more energy to creating an organized network that provides people with a practical means of getting out to the NW (ideally the rural NW for the reasons I stated in my previous post) as well as giving them a community and a reason to stay, as opposed to just posting "come to the northwest white people, you'll like it here" all over chanboards, which is mostly what I've seen you guys do.
>>241683
My suggestion is to move to Utah. This is for several reasons:
- White-majority state
- Mormon religion amenable to social conservatism
- Great geography, a lot of room for development
Once we get there, of course, we must join the LDS church and thereby gain clout.
My suggestion is to move to Utah. This is for several reasons:
- White-majority state
- Mormon religion amenable to social conservatism
- Great geography, a lot of room for development
Once we get there, of course, we must join the LDS church and thereby gain clout.
>>241699
>If I can offer I suggestion, I think you should direct more energy to creating an organized network that provides people with a practical means of getting out to the NW (ideally the rural NW for the reasons I stated in my previous post) as well as giving them a community and a reason to stay
Honestly I have been hoping someone would start an organization that did this. If I was more of a leader I would start one myself.
>If I can offer I suggestion, I think you should direct more energy to creating an organized network that provides people with a practical means of getting out to the NW (ideally the rural NW for the reasons I stated in my previous post) as well as giving them a community and a reason to stay
Honestly I have been hoping someone would start an organization that did this. If I was more of a leader I would start one myself.
>>241378
Not as difficult as you think, as a Washington fag I can tell you vulk of the people you are concerned about are located in king county and easily will be made a drag on any opfor that is concerned with providing them aid because of their reliance on easy to Disrupt infrastructure. Washington and oregon make prime locations for this type of fighting because of land scape and the fact that blueforces would consist of individuals that have lived in the region for 3 or more generations and know it well. I can also tell you their is a growing division between the native population and the flood of people that have moved in the last 10 years which has radically changed washington and Oregon into what you are seeing today.
Not as difficult as you think, as a Washington fag I can tell you vulk of the people you are concerned about are located in king county and easily will be made a drag on any opfor that is concerned with providing them aid because of their reliance on easy to Disrupt infrastructure. Washington and oregon make prime locations for this type of fighting because of land scape and the fact that blueforces would consist of individuals that have lived in the region for 3 or more generations and know it well. I can also tell you their is a growing division between the native population and the flood of people that have moved in the last 10 years which has radically changed washington and Oregon into what you are seeing today.
>>242648
This
If not for the major population centers with their finger on the voting scale (not unlike lots of places, most specifically CA) most of WA is rural, generational families that are as red as you’ll find.
This
If not for the major population centers with their finger on the voting scale (not unlike lots of places, most specifically CA) most of WA is rural, generational families that are as red as you’ll find.
>>242669
LDS are modern kikes. The book of morons consolidates the torah, talmud, and tanakh with a bunch of pseudo-mythical North American """history""" bullshit made up by Daddy Smith. Each (((temple))) has a basin in the shape of a bull ringed with the (((12 great judaic rabbis))). They love money, commit usury, don't pay taxes, own obscene amounts of land and profitable buildings, force tithing, the clergy can have up to 40 slave-wives and 180 children whom they can murder/sell off to a jew or LDS member at will, dope their people to death with church approved (TM) antidepressants, it's considered a (((sinful crime))) to expose any wrong done by the clergy, the clergy has 100% rights to cuck anyone including dissolving a marriage so they don't have to bang a fat bitch, oh, and they have their own Society of Jesuit assassins which are cleverly named the "Danites".
tl;dr: Daddy Jewseph couldn't become an honorary jew to cuck lots of goyim out of money and females, so he made his own jewish religion to cuck as many goyim as possible. Which, given how many LDS there are, is still lots of shekels and free pussy.
LDS are modern kikes. The book of morons consolidates the torah, talmud, and tanakh with a bunch of pseudo-mythical North American """history""" bullshit made up by Daddy Smith. Each (((temple))) has a basin in the shape of a bull ringed with the (((12 great judaic rabbis))). They love money, commit usury, don't pay taxes, own obscene amounts of land and profitable buildings, force tithing, the clergy can have up to 40 slave-wives and 180 children whom they can murder/sell off to a jew or LDS member at will, dope their people to death with church approved (TM) antidepressants, it's considered a (((sinful crime))) to expose any wrong done by the clergy, the clergy has 100% rights to cuck anyone including dissolving a marriage so they don't have to bang a fat bitch, oh, and they have their own Society of Jesuit assassins which are cleverly named the "Danites".
tl;dr: Daddy Jewseph couldn't become an honorary jew to cuck lots of goyim out of money and females, so he made his own jewish religion to cuck as many goyim as possible. Which, given how many LDS there are, is still lots of shekels and free pussy.
File (): D4D315691ABC6029D23347A5B5B6E5AD-237803.png (232.2 KB, 1024x740, twilight_reading_a_book.png)
>>241373
>The goal is to ensure whites get a slice of the pie when America balkanizes.
Ahem.
And you think the (((planners))) don't know that? Your view is about a tactical strategy, but the opponent has a strategical one. While you think about to keep a piece of land, (((they))) are planning to take over the world.
It is not my intention to demoralize you, but to give you a splash of cold reality and to make you turn to a fuzzier approach instead of to offer a target to be droned.
Get into the enemy's mind and look around, what the jewry is doing, what the UN club is planning, what the local puppets are claiming and pushing.
Stop, think, plan
>>242687
Whats funny is that while all true, LDS temple iconography is directly plagiarized from freemasonry
Whats funny is that while all true, LDS temple iconography is directly plagiarized from freemasonry
File (): 9D141E74CE03D58B69089C1A5BDCBC6C-3266192.mp4 (3.1 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:58, Rural Americans.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>242689
>And you think the (((planners))) don't know that? Your view is about a tactical strategy, but the opponent has a strategical one.
The Pacific North West is a nice idea, but not grounded on reality. Eventually it will be overrun by a superior force. But what is the key flaw of the idea is that Whites as a whole are divided, and when not, spiritually are rotten by materialistic ideals about wealth and comfort. Any individual infected with this mindset has himself/herself as number one priority, therefore betrayal and cowardice will pop up everywhere and every time.
As Hitler said: "The most precious possession is your own people", but most people today hardly will live by that idea, their individualist and libertarian ideas have priority over the group survival, and now this mindset is their undoing.
It is a blackpill, but better to face it and to change course for another strategy before valued Whites are suppressed without gain.
>Paul Krugman Has a Message for White Rural Americans
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KcH0zxrGsgs/
>And you think the (((planners))) don't know that? Your view is about a tactical strategy, but the opponent has a strategical one.
The Pacific North West is a nice idea, but not grounded on reality. Eventually it will be overrun by a superior force. But what is the key flaw of the idea is that Whites as a whole are divided, and when not, spiritually are rotten by materialistic ideals about wealth and comfort. Any individual infected with this mindset has himself/herself as number one priority, therefore betrayal and cowardice will pop up everywhere and every time.
As Hitler said: "The most precious possession is your own people", but most people today hardly will live by that idea, their individualist and libertarian ideas have priority over the group survival, and now this mindset is their undoing.
It is a blackpill, but better to face it and to change course for another strategy before valued Whites are suppressed without gain.
>Paul Krugman Has a Message for White Rural Americans
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KcH0zxrGsgs/
22 replies | 6 files | 13 UUIDs | Archived