So, apparently there is no Epstein client list. He killed himself. There was no blackmail. There was no sex trafficking of children. Epstein was just a well connected Jew who got into something that got him and Maxwell charged with some crimes that we should all just forget. It's nothing really. We caught some bad guys over there---> See! We're all about law and order at the Trump administration.
18 replies and 18 files omitted.
>>393828This shit is literally coming from the 1984 novel.
I kid you not.
>>393841>Police>protect the real criminals>attack the vigilantesYeah. that's how I see it too.
>>393843>to be subject of a citizen investigation.>So, it is trust us, or elseThat's a great point. We(the population) have just grown up with these concepts that we take them for granted, when they they really don't make sense. Like, imo, everything that's not a dictatorship is a lie.
>>393828I feel like while
we obviously don't believe this, it's a good to consider, how to convince a normal person of the correct event. Not so much because that's necessary what I mean we should do, but more to understand the situation better. Do maybe normals don't buy into this narrative, yet again I don't know how much the public care about this topic. Get the feeling its niche sort of topic, which they just put in the box of news called, "bad stuff that happens in the world," sort of thing.
Anyway, to convince someone of something, I usually avoid using arguments that rely on external evidence, such as document and such, but more on Occam's razor and conclusions that are drawn on concepts that are generally excepted. This is because external proofs such as, "they wooden doors" or something, even when true(in this particular case idk myself), will often be handwaved, as they will insist that you are wrong and they know the truth.
So instead, I would do something like this for Epstein case:
>He own an island>He brought the children there>But he had no network (and no clients)>And before he could spill any beans, he inconveniently killed himself.>drats! >Oh, well. There's nothing more you can ask of us. Let's move on. >>393946i know this may sound like something you hear on
/x/ but the idea of illuminainai is not a lie
governments work by themselves for themselves to create a monopolitical kleptocratic mafiosa that scratches on everything to stay on power
--
democracy does not exist when hierarchy system exist and people with the higher ranks can get away with what the commoners can't
social infrastructure and laddering system that requires you to be rich and use lobbying to get anywhere is not a good way governing a country
--
sorry if my english is shit , but you'll get what i am trying to say here
If Trump knows what's good for him, he would start firing people to save face.
>>393950The pajeet and the chump versus da karen, one of those sides is lying. And it is clear cut that da karen gotta go to protect the cover up.
>>393969How in fucking hell they even trusted a cow fucker to be the Ceo of CIA??? America's most private and crucial position ever??!!
at this point we live in some type of comedy movie
i don't understand how people won't realize this shit
>>393992>releasing the list might damage the economyThat's fucking absurd and bending the narrative to justify the cover up.
The presence of an active 5th column and treason galore takes the upmost precedence over anything else.
This Trump guy was elected to deliver on his promises, if he can't then the right thing to do is to step down.
>>394005>That's fucking absurdIt's probably true, tbh. Exposing the fact that so many elite bankers, politicians and other elites are pedos would probably fuck up the economy.
They should be exposed anyway though. To hell with the economy.
>This Trump guy was elected to deliver on his promises, if he can't then the right thing to do is to step down.He will never step down.
>>394005>if he can't then the right thing to do is to step downImagine actually thinking this arrogant douche would ever step down. The only conceivable way it would happen, is if the hard left (the anti-zionist left) physically forced him out. But I'm not sure that would be preferable? Since they hate white people every bit as much as zionist trumpbots.
The irony of the whole debacle is that it's mostly trump supporters making a big stink about it. That's not a bad thing, I want the leader I support to get a bitchslap for his mistakes; keeps them on their toes. It's just, I barely heard even the deranged politicians mention this. I expected the usual suspects to jump on such a prime opportunity to almost justify their irrational hatred of one overtanned old man, but the news seemed more preoccupied with ICE and some shit.
>>394056>The irony of the whole debacle is that it's mostly trump supporters making a big stink about it.I would call it consistence. Trump promised stuff and must deliver. But I suspect that if he reaches the 75 million mark of non-Whites expelled, then everything might be forgiven. Bonus points and eternal gratitude if the remaining non-Whites must go to mandatory sterilization as condition for residence.
Damn Elmo is based
sheng papiro should be first
I swear to every holy and unholy things that this pedos are gonna start a world war rather than releasing the files
i am predicting it
The Orange Jew was on it, if course they'd get rid of it.
I like how the epstein list was on the FBI director's desk a couple of months ago and now it never existed.
>>394201so you want the list? here you go
>>394261here is one pol thread about it capped as pdf
The original footage has been found:
>>394268kek , pinkamena killed jeffy boi, it is canon
>>394256>1st picWell, Nick Fuentes yesterday caused an earthquake in the MAGA base by denouncing Trump, calling him a con artist among many other unsavory things and saying MAGA is a scam.
The anti-Whites' review with the juicy parts:
>Nick Fuentes SLAYS Donald Trump![YouTube] Nick Fuentes SLAYS Donald Trump!
[Embed]And the whole segment of the Fuentes' show (it gets really spicy):
>Trump Says "I Don't Want Your Support"https://rumble.com/v6wbtie-trump-says-i-dont-want-your-support.html >>394356>Nick Fuentes yesterday caused an earthquake in the MAGA base by denouncing TrumpHe does that all the time. He campaigned against him and told people to vote for Kamala.
He's a grifting faggot (literally) with AIDS.
>>394363It gets even better, now Nick has gone mainstream and portraited by the judenpresse.
This timeline is incredible. WOW
>Republicans hold up vote on Trump's DOGE cuts over Epstein case[YouTube] Republicans hold up vote on Trump's DOGE cuts over Epstein case
[Embed] >>394363>He's a grifting faggot (literally) with AIDS.He's OUR grifting faggot (literally) with AIDS.
KEK
>>394377His whole deal is to rile people up and get spread around like a common cold. It's just plain obnoxious, but at least I don't give him money to be a niggerfaggot.
>>394379>but at least I don't give him money to be a niggerfaggot.Funding him is a noble cause.
>>394363I recall that was a last minute thing and after trump won he immediately flipped back for a second, probably to maximize people getting angry toward him.
In fact, if you operate under the assumption that whatever the fuck his fanbase keeps shilling is silly words to get attention, you can maybe get some real truth otta the guy.
That is to say:
>if you see it, it's him trolling>if you seek it, it's probably what he actually believesNick's fanbase is comprised of people who deliberately want negative attention on him cuz it's the most entertaining, so I argue it's quite accurate to assume the above.
We need to bring back the "no e-celebs" rule...
>>394387Sorry, but Nick is now mainstream and a noticeable player in the right-wing. That rule does not apply.
>>394389That applies to all e-celebs. And just because normies like him doesn't make his opinion relevant to this thread. Go make another thread to talk about him.
>>394390>And just because normies like him doesn't make his opinion relevant to this threadYou are unmistakably wrong. His opinion is shaping the 2026 election right now.
>>394390Mate, he's doing it on purpose.
>>395033asmon and moistcritical are the real ones
only streamers that i can genuinely respect
>>395034Asmon, sure, but not moist. Moist fencesits so hard the post goes in his rectum and out his mouth. I still have not regained respect of him for somehow failing an argument with the retarded muslim.
>>395091i like him because he is one of the most moral people i know on the youtube
> failing an argument with the retarded muslim.you mean sneako?
i mean it is like 1-1 for now
don't forget his MAGZ!!
>>395106>moist>one of the most moralWell, I suppose the majority opinion does lean toward the morally good direction. Usually. ...Hopefully.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/07/25/trump-says-hes-allowed-to-pardon-ghislaine-maxwell-amid-epstein-files-controversy/>there is a possibility that Ghislaine Maxwell might get pardoned by Donald trump>Trumps said ,He hasn't considered it , but he is allowed to do so--
''OH you said released the files!?
i thought you said released the philes!"
so far this is not his first time doing it
>pic