31 replies and 21 files omitted.
>>376573If this is true it's hilarious
>>376012isn't it supposed to be, 'you are not mad, you are not like us.'?
>>376009>DiscussNot much to say. The Kamala whore is my pick.
Accelerate baby.
>>376590
>I don't care about gun rights
Trump banned bumpstocks and pushed forward Redflag Laws.
>fuel prices
Ah, the money distraction... C'mon anon, these (((leaders))) are everyday richer and )))WE((( are everyday poorer.
The street prices won't cut it.
>white replacement
Mr. Trump and acolytes are fond to "legal" non-white immigration and to stick a green card to every foreign non-white college or university graduate.
-----
Dear anon Trump supporter, get the following into your skull, there is no political solution and making the middle class uncomfortable, even to intolerable levels, will make them to face the reality about what it must be done.
>>376581oh, yea, now i see that it makes sense that way.
>>376589i honestly think trump is the acceleration candidate. the left is not shy about protest and causing violence when they don't get their way. while there was some right wing violence in the uk, it didn't really spread like the fentanyl floyd riots.
it's getting the right to react to their bullshit that's the issue. i think getting conservatives to hate cops would be a step in the right direction, but not sure that's possible.
>>376591>Trump banned bumpstocks and pushed forward Redflag Laws.That's far less than what Harris would do.
>money distractionI have a family to care for; dependents to feed. It's not a "distraction", it's survival.
>street prices won't cut it.Street prices are what I have to deal with every day.
>"legal" non-white immigrationStill considerably better than what Harris is doing.
>making the middle class uncomfortableIt's not a question of comfort, it's survival. I have young and elderly dependents to take care of.
>will make them to face the reality about what it must be doneOh yeah, children and grandmas will totally overthrow ZOG once they no longer have guns or a place to sleep.
>>376594So losing gun rights entirely is preferable to this?
The bump stock ban got overturned, by the same justices that Trump appointed.
>>376595>So losing gun rights entirely is preferable to this?If you lose your Right, then it was never yours and you don't deserve it.
Sorry but that's the truth.
>>376596Way to avoid the question.
I bet you don't even own a gun, you larping faggot.
>>376597>Way to avoid the question.Far from it. Read it twice and parse implications and consequences of such a profound post.
>>376599Lost them all in a boating accident
>>376600How do you expect to overthrow ZOG without guns?
>>376601How do you expect a function in life when you can't recognize innuendo?
>>376604So you don't own a gun then.
>>376604Don't get entangled in personal questions that may conduce to hostile fighters kicking your door. Pay attention at how some (((anons))) avoid the main issue and try to corner you with secondary issues. It is not random by the way.
>>376619Oh c'mon, "Lost in a boating accident" and "No I don't have a (singular) gun" is classic glowie-trolling. Go bother the fags who are trying to derail wih firearm questions
>guns
How weak, I have a fedora, a katana, a sensible dark coat and the best battle buddy.
He's my brother in blood, water and spirit.
Didn't think too much about him till he pulled me up and wiped off the shit.
He in short said come with me if you want to live.
As a certified tipper it's one thing to swarm like fish but like a lone shark it's about that speed of a singular thinker against the din.
So immediately I fucked off to find fish to feast on.
Everything working just fine, survived octopi, jellyfish, sea sponges, starfish, pineapples and rodents of unusual size.
Like sharks running into a bad crack means there's no way to turn around or get out.
I found myself on the edge the biggest dirtiest crack there was.
That sinkhole just sucking whatever nearby into it, going back just means not knowing how long was left.
So it's go in and see the depths or die with the boring stuff.
It's dark in there.
Whatever was in there, well for me it wasn't personal.
Then an even darker sinkhole and down I go plunging into those depths.
It just doesn't end with the sinkholes and no those aren't innuendo.
Anyway it's been a hot while since the start and the underground-underground there's no helping it getting back wasn't in the cards and like a decent gambler knowing when to fold it would be soon.
So some madlad walks up to the table puts everything all in.
He won the game because 52 card pick up means there's only losers,
He garbbed them by the balls like a velvet titanium hydraulic press, firm, fuzzy and football.
You should already know his deal. Apparently some messager got it in his head to overthrow his betters.
As you could guess he's not with them anymore now.
It's time to split this joint.
Anyway battle buddy gets the scruff of my neck and I'm out of the sinkholes.
I won't get into the noodles or why it at the time required some quick time unions.
So there he is and you know what it's time to duke it out.
And he won before I could gt in a hit.
You know what he said? You are already dead.
Knowing how it would go I refused to say what again.
I'm no neigher.
Then some shitty lawyer asks what's updog.
Getting blasted didn't sound like a good time for me.
There's only so much.
Not much else to say but eventually.
Watch the grave sail off changes a man..
Who could stand against him? Nobody that's for sure.
But at the time of highnoon .
There wasn't much I could offer.
To put it calmly he was covered .
Thing is hes already been thirty since I didn't have ammo or a ready blade.
Then it got spicy as he bleed alot.often I think about some of the ways he's represented.
He's right behind you
That's the boating incident and how he did everything.
Festering feathery fucks and no more gun.
You know what I have to deal with no.
Couldn't do that, but there's.
Told me bout where he was from.
So he found me
It's ben Pretty
Here's also wants to be your battle buddy.
From lawless to good will I'd suggest joining the winner.
He's got a friend in me, he is who he is. He is that he is.
Thanks J.
So have his rest he's got some words for you and bread and drink.
>>376619These words were typed by someone who doesn't own a gun.
>>376050This post didn't age well
>>376626Subtext:
For someone so recently on about the thread being derailed on grounds of religious discussion, it is in poor standing to then engage in derailment on grounds of nonsense gun banter
>>376627The discussion was started by people who don't even own guns saying that we should elect Walz and make everyone's life slightly worse so that normies with decide to overthrow ZOG.
People who aren't even prepared to fight seem to think that normies will do the fighting for them, if they elect people who promise to disarm everyone.
>>376628I think you don't know where you are, if you are honestly suggesting that anyone here is advocating for the election of Tim Waltz as vice president let alone Kamala Harris as president. Weather posters have or not, I'm sure they have the good sense to not overtly indicate what, how many, Etc. Assume all the guns. Now, make a good argument.
>>376634Advocating for accellerationism isnt the same as advocating for a candidate, you disingenuous twat. I knew I should have thrown an "unironically" in that prediction.
Is this how you conduct yourself?
>>376596To resume that idea in a picrel image.
What 2nd Amendment believers say it is a Right, the government says it is conditional permission subject to its whims and in line with breaking every treaty has made before with the American Nationals.
>>376637It is functionally the same thing: advocating for the candidate to be elected.
>>376642In a one-sighted, reductionist sense, you could be said to be not wrong
You still havent made an actual argument
>>376643An actual argument for what? To vote for the candidate that would result in better quality of life?
>>376666Nice quads
Ideally, an argument would involve refuting an accelerationist position directly or generally, rather than simply dismissing it
>>376678>refuting an accelerationist position directly or generallyVoting for Tim Walz would accelerate loss of gun rights faster than it accelerates economic collapse; normies would be deprived of their few guns, and this their capacity to resist after their economic conditions are no longer comfortable.
And there's not going to be another generation to fight if liberals groom all white children into trannies.
Accelerationists said society would collapse if Biden got elected, and instead society just got incrementally shittier and globohomo continued to consolidate power at a steady rate. The same would happen if you elect Harris/Walz.
>>376683Hot take: normalfaggots dont deserve guns. If theyre unarmed at this point, its their fault. Besides that, Tim can Waltz his ass up and down the supreme court all he wants, and sit and spin. AND, on the chance they A. pack the court or B. it fails to uphold the 2nd ammendment (a dubious suggestion, given their recent track record), that will only activate,... large swaths of very well arme individuals, groups, etc.
Which if you're an accelerationist IS THE PLAN. So while I agree that voting for Trump is the best plan for the aggregate, neither you nor I can credibly say that electing Harris wouldn't cause the massive upheaval that is an accelerationist's dream. Wether that is "good" or not is subject to all manner of biases whoch I'll recuse myself of right now
>groom all white children into tranniesAssuming this was possible (yes, "all white children" is a laughable proposition), I think you underestimate how violently pissed a number of not-insignificant groups are at the grooming that has already happened, and the response that is likely when (not if) it continues.
>>376685>normalfaggots dont deserve gunsIf the point of accelerationism is to get normalfaggots to overthrow ZOG, how do they do that without guns?
>neither you nor I can credibly say that electing Harris wouldn't cause the massive upheaval that is an accelerationist's dreamNo. I don't believe that. Harris's policies were literally copy-pasted from the Biden campaign page. It's would be 4 more years of Biden: 4 more years of slow rot and gradually chipping away at our rights.
>>376687>If the point of accelerationism is to get normalfaggots to overthrow ZOG, how do they do that without guns?Ostensibly, by proving themselves useful to the individuals and groups that have had the presence of mind to stockpile weapons and ammo, of course
>It would be 4 more years of BidenI think you underestimate how radical Kamala is willing to be (likely cuz handlers). If elected, I imagine she would run wih "first wamen prez" like a divine mandate
>>376689>that have had the presence of mind to stockpile weapons and ammo, of courseAnd so when Harris/Walz use executive orders to confiscate your ammo stockpiles, how are you going to arm the normies?
>>376699Are you operating under the illusion hat ibhey tried that those well-armed individuals an groups are gonna say "aw shucks" an comply?
>>376700If you they could resist arms confiscation during peace times by themselves, the could just overthrow ZOG now.
Voting for people who will confiscate your guns has no return on investment.
>>376702That's a false equivalence. You're suggesting that "because individuals and groups haven't assaulted/overthrown the government, means they can't."
You're an idiot.
>>376894>roastie thot>exaggerated/affected speech patternReminder, she thinks her opinion has value because people keep wanting to put their dick in it.
All yours anon, just... please use protection until her syphilus clears up
>>376896This anon knows what is going on.
>>376894People with tattoos are mentally ill. Breeding with one should be a felony.