Steven Colbert absolutely destroys trumpanzees with his new killer Dark Brandon meme.
The meme war is over, and you chuds lost!
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
File (): 643471D0D31B8F5842EEC5ADB5DFE8DD-1286249.mp4 (1.2 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:18, downloadfile-9.bin (26).mp4) [play once] [loop]
File (): 78C12C4E6BBFB65E528F25665554DB05-96497.jpg (94.2 KB, 1014x550, 025D3E2F13A9D34498962B41F1FBA527-96479.jpg)
File (): 0820F2C36EF729289E59887F15D89B38-1851043.png (1.8 MB, 1129x1441, 0820F2C36EF729289E59887F15D89B38-1851043.png)
File (): 84AEC6D69EBFE45C4069967178CD10F8-116422.jpg (113.7 KB, 1061x1321, 1716493718951712.jpg)
File (): 9ACAE2E5A3F9278AB9CC472469175C44-2421894.png (2.3 MB, 6000x6000, 3248999.png)
>>373508
Are they actually using the "Dark Brandon" moniker themselves? I thought that was just a term we came up with to make fun of him.
Are they actually using the "Dark Brandon" moniker themselves? I thought that was just a term we came up with to make fun of him.
I hate leftists
https://www.businessinsider.com/biden-campaign-jobs-hiring-meme-manager-social-media-work-2024-5/
>Someone was actually paid for this
>Someone was actually paid for this
>"Memes are a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural."
>"Is it possible to learn this power?"
>"Not from the Left."
>"Is it possible to learn this power?"
>"Not from the Left."
>>373915
Tbh, it doesn't really matter if Trump supporters like it. These kinds of slogans are made to scare Democrats into actually voting at all, and to scare centrist normies into voting Democrat.
Doesn't appear to be working for that either though.
Tbh, it doesn't really matter if Trump supporters like it. These kinds of slogans are made to scare Democrats into actually voting at all, and to scare centrist normies into voting Democrat.
Doesn't appear to be working for that either though.
It's easy to scare fear-mongering cuckoids into line. There's a specific term for this called 'Hegelian Dialectic'.
This problem is created, produced, and deployed as follows:
#1: identify a (((suffering victim)))
#2: (((preach))) to the victim that their suffering is caused by /that guy/
#3: (((preach to the victim's friends and supporters))) that /that guy/ is the source of ALL misery
#4: create and impose fake situations in which /that guy/ has ALWAYS been the (((problem)))
#5: """ask""" the shared circlejerk if /that guy/ has ever harmed ANYONE ELSE
#6: make SPECIFIC ALLUSIONS to people whom act similar to /that guy/ being the (((real problem)))
#7: loudly and goyproudly proclaim /that guy/ """does not belong!!!!" using pseudo or faux-religious doubleplusungoodthink
#8: repeat.
This problem is created, produced, and deployed as follows:
#1: identify a (((suffering victim)))
#2: (((preach))) to the victim that their suffering is caused by /that guy/
#3: (((preach to the victim's friends and supporters))) that /that guy/ is the source of ALL misery
#4: create and impose fake situations in which /that guy/ has ALWAYS been the (((problem)))
#5: """ask""" the shared circlejerk if /that guy/ has ever harmed ANYONE ELSE
#6: make SPECIFIC ALLUSIONS to people whom act similar to /that guy/ being the (((real problem)))
#7: loudly and goyproudly proclaim /that guy/ """does not belong!!!!" using pseudo or faux-religious doubleplusungoodthink
#8: repeat.
>>373925
I feel like this is the sort of thing (((centrists))) would accuse us of doing if we were to bring up the matter of the JQ.
I feel like this is the sort of thing (((centrists))) would accuse us of doing if we were to bring up the matter of the JQ.
>>373925
This isn’t what a Hegelian dialectic is. In fact what you’re describing isn’t even an example of a Hegelian dialectic. I have no idea how or why this term came to be associated with Jew trickery, probably because Marx appropriated it for his philosophy, but in any case you’re using it wrong.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic
This isn’t what a Hegelian dialectic is. In fact what you’re describing isn’t even an example of a Hegelian dialectic. I have no idea how or why this term came to be associated with Jew trickery, probably because Marx appropriated it for his philosophy, but in any case you’re using it wrong.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic
>>373926
Yeah, tbh, especially considering that (((that guy))) is in fact a source of a lot of our suffering.
It's not really inherently wrong to blame others for your suffering if your suffering is actually caused by those people: that's just self-defense.
Yeah, tbh, especially considering that (((that guy))) is in fact a source of a lot of our suffering.
It's not really inherently wrong to blame others for your suffering if your suffering is actually caused by those people: that's just self-defense.
>>373928
>This isn’t what a Hegelian dialectic is. In fact what you’re describing isn’t even an example of a Hegelian dialectic.
Correct.
>I have no idea how or why this term came to be associated with Jew trickery
It's brainrotted nu/pol/ mis-using terms and repeating buzzwords until they no longer have any meaning, followed by stupid redditors amplifying it tenfold.
Words have meaning. Get your terms straight.
>This isn’t what a Hegelian dialectic is. In fact what you’re describing isn’t even an example of a Hegelian dialectic.
Correct.
>I have no idea how or why this term came to be associated with Jew trickery
It's brainrotted nu/pol/ mis-using terms and repeating buzzwords until they no longer have any meaning, followed by stupid redditors amplifying it tenfold.
Words have meaning. Get your terms straight.