>>307755>The same PAY-AGAINS and HEATHENS whom were raped, enslaved, tortured, destroyed, genocided, and marginalized for 1,600~ years?
You're being a little silly. Our you their champion? You fight this heroic struggle against your fellow whites for their sake? Give me a break. Many of the posts you post on this obscured board where /pol/ and /mlp/ meet are filled with vitriol. You don't spare any rods on people who are super close to agreeing completely with you on everything
but you are angry over deaths hundreds of years ago? Yeah, okay but it doesn't seem to fit the bill. [Read: It's hard to imagine you as a bleeding heart.]
Let's say that you're position is correct about everything, then you must
also admit that the nationalistic christians here are either tricked by the kikes or that they simply have misunderstood a bunch of stuff.
Wouldn't it be better to try to, look look look this gonna sound crazy, you just engaged with them in a civilized conversation? What if both parties could just talk to each other? This is a chan with a bunch of strangers, we really shouldn't need to keep face here nor do we necessarily need to win debates to prove (onceand for all!!!)
that we're right.
Anyway, if you hurt people's ego they are more likey to resent you and in extension not listen to you. Calling someone stupid might make them not listen to you.Wait, I'm I a hypocrite?
Who would have thunked?
Bottom-line, there's really no reason for you to burn bridges like this. These christians here are not people who killed those people hundreds of years ago. >"I'm not in this with (You), at least until (You) shape the fuck up and cease continuing to be an ignorant crypto-jew?"
Well, it wouldn't work on me because I would just call you the real kike and leave. And besides, I can be as jewish as I fucking want just to spite you. Tomorrow I'll go and buy a bagel.>The hisory of Jesus's name
I don't take history seriously in debates and this is kinda why. You see how both this chain of "facts" are actually irrelevant to our current discussion and also doesn't prove anything. Here's the thing about historical arguements, I can barely remember what I did yesterday but I should believe that a bunch of bias, flawed, and strangers have figured out exactly what happened in the past, hundreds of years ago not to mention thousend years ago? I don't. It is the same with science. Unlike, math I cannot conduct the experiment myself and test it but I should believe the scientists in CERN that their billion-dollar particle canon proved some scientfic theory, otherwise people will say I'm stooopid. Well, I guess I'm so fucking dumb then.
Point being, that I can say that I didn't know about these "facts" and I don't know if this chain of events is true or not. I'm not afraid of admitting that. But I'm also way to cynical to believe that you would have everything figured out as you like to present yourself either. Anons like to posture as if they have read endless books on subjects and shit. Sure, projection but I don't believe that I'm that far from the truth so I feel no shame in saying something without proof, it wouldn't be the first time.
People believe most of the time in what they want to believe. I have a limited time in my life. I could look into this and try to decipher the truth on this matter. I could find any number of explanation for this or I could discover that it is true or I would discover that it is flase from the root.
Point is that I don't time to actually do that seriously enough to get answers for those questions and again that's all in the past (far back in the past), which makes it more or less rrelevant to our situation now.
What do you think you accomplsih with this shit arguement? Do you think that christians on site will be scared shitless and run away from their keyboard due to your increadible mic drop? Or, that they will change and see the light?
They will either dismiss it, say that's irrelevant, or start to (try/succeed) in debunking it.
, the wise, would do in your shoes is to first have a friendly tone in my discourse, and then I would try to push the conversation onto why I think christianity is bad in the present.I still like you buddy but the way your posts are always so angryyyy, makes me one prod you so this post came out a bit more sassy than necessary perhaps. But you can take it, right? ;^P>Inb4 insultsinsultinsult crypto-kike!!!!>pic 4 thread