[ mlpol / qa / go / 1ntr / vx / sp / üb / a ] [ Overboard ] [ Statistics / Banlist / Search ] [ PonyX ] [ Policy / Store ] [ home ]

/go/ - Golden Oaks

Thread Repository
Name
Email
Subject
Comment

File
:
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1493345434938.gif (257.74 KB, 220x164, 13948139521.gif)

88eb0 No.558

THE BOARD IS BEING PURGED

MODS EXPLAIN

88d1f No.560

>>558
ctrl alt delete

a4cfc No.561

>>558
dealing with it

88d1f No.562

>>560
Is this going to be a daily affair because it seems to be helping the poster get what he/she/it wants.

5b167 No.563

>>562
Solutions are being discussed right now

88d1f No.564

>>18076
No tune this time. If we are going to have a purge out at least we could have some background music.

fc959 No.565

>>558
I tried to rebuild the board but got banned

25383 No.566

File: 1493345974329.jpg (99.97 KB, 800x519, xc2010-03-3-11-000.jpg)

>>564
shit you're right good call jap

25383 No.567


88d1f No.568


88d1f No.569


b6097 No.570

>>565
Sorry about that, you're unb& now

fc959 No.571

>>563
Wichita is taking credit for this. You still have his IP. Can you contact his service provider. Also can you unban me?

25383 No.572


88d1f No.573


88d1f No.574


88d1f No.575


9bdc4 No.576


adbc7 No.577

>>570
Dox Wichita please. You have his IP

5b167 No.578

>>577
It's not happening. What are you even going to do with the information? Get his mom to take his GBP for being an internet tryhard?

adbc7 No.579

>>578
I'm on Westlaw looking at the laws of kansas to see if we can take legal action

bfd9d No.580

>>563
On your side, a thread creation burst limit of 15 an hour would be a possible safe guard.

f8035 No.581

File: 1493347177220.png (1.11 MB, 5726x7331, 654345654.png)

I was going to leave the weebs alone too. Fat fucking chance of that happening now.

adbc7 No.582

Okay, looking at the laws of Kansas (mods, confirm this for us) harassment is a plausible criminal legal charge against Wichita

“Harassment,” under the stalking statute, means a knowing and intentional course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose. K.S.A. 21–3438(d)(2).

State v. Whitesell, 270 Kan. 259, 259, 13 P.3d 887, 894 (2000)

mlpol isn't technically a person, but there are multiple people on this board so it's really harassment with multiple targets. I haven't seen any internet harassment based prosecutions in the case law but I bet a creative prosecutor can extend telephone and texting based harassment to the image board context

bfd9d No.583

>>582
Don't forget abuse of terms of service. Basically you can take anyone to court for repeat rule breaking.

5b167 No.584

>>583
Yes and no. 99% of TOS agreements are unenforceable which is why they all have arbitration clauses

adbc7 No.585

>>583
We can definitely do that for the posts from his AT&T provider, which he used initially. He seems to be using proxies now so we can't use that
>>584
We can take him to arbitration

be518 No.586

>>581
Nah, m8. Conserve your energy to post here instead.
I used to shitpost there out of habit, even before the merge, but then I realized every shitpost I did there could've been a quality post here.
We need to build-up board traffic.

b6097 No.587

>>586
Agreed

cfdd8 No.588

File: 1493349157914.gif (1.09 MB, 304x336, 2149c97cd2220e44c61e49c786….gif)

>>582
Incorporate and you have corporate person hood and that statute is enforceable, if any one even bothers to enforce it.

88d1f No.589

Again!

e1bad No.590

I couldn't figure out what had happened - this explains it.



[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ mlpol / qa / go / 1ntr / vx / sp / üb / a ] [ Overboard ] [ Statistics / Banlist / Search ] [ PonyX ] [ Policy / Store ] [ home ]