/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>331678
>It can't happen over Ukraine
WWI happened over Serbia
WWII happened over Poland and Manchuria
You better fucking believe it can happen over Ukraine

>>331680
Fucking hell. I do not need to be drafted this year.

>>331681
They'll take me before they take you, I can ensure you of that much. We'll see though. We'll see.

>>331683
I still have my doubts that the U.S. will go to war with Russia even if Russia does invade Ukraine. They already said that they'd only have economic sanctions as response.
Meanwhile, those economic measures might not even go through because Germany wants Russia's gas.

>>331681
I remember how people used to scare me with the draft when i was a kiddo, fucking assholes...

t.Castizo who unironically lived illegally IN MEXICO up until high-school

>>331708
The draft is such a stupid, feudalistic institution. Selective service is always there to remind us the the government considers our lives property of the state.

>>331711
I wouldn't mind it if only the guverment actually served in the interest of the volk, i'll die for a place like that, but i didn't, i don't and will never want to die over globohomo

If any WWIII shit does happen, I'll either dodge it or something. I don't wanna be a part of the third brother war.

>>331678
Doupt it, everyone is too cucked right now.

Nothing ever happens in the 21st century

>>331720
Isn't there a genocide happening in Myanmar right now?

>>331721
is there?

>>331722
>>331721
I think it's pretty much over by now.

>>331723
>>331721
was it based?

>>331724
Just brown on brown violence.

>>331678
Who says it hasn’t already started? The KGB and the CCP may already be trying to spy on innocent American citizens. Though there is also the (slim) possibility that a second American civil war could play a part of it and the US could be the battlefield.

>>331729
We know they're spying. Everyone and their grandma is spying. The question is whether or not we're going to have to go to war over this bullshit.

>>331729
>Though there is also the (slim) possibility that a second American civil war could play a part of it and the US could be the battlefield.
Well, that actually gives me something to look forward to. I'd rather die fighting here than in some slavshit icebox.

>>331729
>The KGB and the CCP
I'm more worried about the US gov spying on the public, because they have been doing it for far longer.

>>331733
This, tbh. We know for a fact that our government does it, and that it has an incentive to do so constantly.
Pic unrelated

>>331733
Anyone remember the retarded fed screenshoots with (you)'s in every post trying to blame the CCP and Russia?

Funny how something so legendary-retarded as that still got memory-holed

>>331735
I honestly don't care what the CCP/KGB is doing so long as I don't have to go to war over it.

>>331736
It was big tho, feds filed a report with 4chan screencaps on it, but forgot to hide the (you)'s in their posts, exposing themselves and their shenanigans in the most retarded boomer-tier manner

>>331737
If you have that screencap, I'd like to read it. I never pass up a chance to laugh at feds.

The fact that the U.S. evacuated the Ukraine embassy practically guarantees that Russia is going to invade. It's basically a declaration that the U.S. has abandoned them.

>>331737
source? I want to shove it in the face of anyone who calls me a shitzo.

>>331716
in the midst of a war people might actually start balkanizing in the us.

>>331744
That would be the best timeline, tbh.

>>331743
Actually, i asked because i don't have it anymore...

Metokur made a stream about it if that helps anyone interested enough to lurk

<Going through the 8chan affidavit. Not only did they print out and then re-scan screenshots of the /pol/ thread, but there are several (You)s in the thread. God, our intelligence community has never been more incompetent.
https://archive.fo/dcdR4
<Saw this earlier.
https://archive.fo/DTtQg
>FBI Visited 8chan User For Discussing New Zealand Shooting; FBI Also Posted Bait In 8chan
https://archive.fo/Rj1WY
The article only exists in archives because OAG gamer suffered a literal coup back in November of 2020, and purged almost all of their articles.

Here's the full FBI document if you want to peruse it: https://www.scribd.com/document/413547792/Poway-shooting-8chan-search-warrant

>>331748
This is what our fucking tax money goes to.
Fucking useless glowniggers.

>>331748
Ultimate Ebin Moment

Thanks anon

>>331733
But would you rather have that information in the hands of a relatively benign entity or one who is actively using imperialist threats and tactics to take over one of its neighbors? We don’t see the US looking to take over Canada or Mexico anytime soon, now are we? I know that both of them are doing it, but Russia and China doing it to the US and using the information in a warlike manner to promote their global agendas is worse.

>>331747
>>331743
while i dont have the cap itself, mr Autistic made a video about it. the cap is in it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HUdnRojJVQ

>>331762
>Be afraid of the spooky foreign powers!!!!
No.

>>331764
How would you like it if those powers violated our sovereignty and intruded on our freedoms? We may as well have no borders or nations.

>>331678
>Is this shit really going to go down, or is it all media hype?
It is another psyop for domestic consumption.
Russia has no need of a war at all.
As things are rapidly deteriorating in the west, all what Russia has to do is to relax and wait while eating popcorn. The same goes for China.
Military, the US and allies are sitting ducks against Russian missiles and without any meaningful defense.
What is true indeed is the desire of the US to create a flashpoint and then to drag NATO into the frail. Of course NATO will be defeated, but the goal is not victory, but a longer game.
A defeated Europe will close the door to Russian natural gas and replace it with the liquefied one from the US and its arabic allies while also closing the door to the projected freight railroad from China to Europe. It will reshuffle this century again in favor of America, or, at least that is the plan. I'm pretty sure Putin has other ideas.

>>331678
>the whole "Trump will start WW3" was projection
what the fuck do these sub-faggots don't project?

>>331774
But a war with Russia or China would mean a war between nuclear powers who have hypersonic weapon capability and the power to use cyber attacks to cripple entire cities or regions of each other’s country. In short, a Third World War would cause mutually assured destruction and a collapse of the world’s standard of living and economies, causing a recession far, far worse than the one caused by the pandemic.

The more likely scenario is a proxy war in the style of the Vietnam War and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, where the factions would support causes in the fighting without necessarily putting their own boots on the ground. Russia could support the separatists in Donbas with weapons and funding, while the US and NATO could do the same with Ukraine’s military forces. Likewise, the US could supply Taiwan and Hong Kong with naval and air capabilities while China supports pro-CCP riots in the regions without putting any of their own boots on the ground.
>>331793
One possibility, though, is that Trump’s policies, through action or inaction, have already set off the chain of events necessary even though he is no longer in office.

>>331798
>But a war with Russia or China would mean a war between nuclear powers
In the hypothetical case that nuclear weapons exist indeed and are not another hoax, I'm sure the the (((oligarchs))) calling the shots are not imbeciles. Nuclear war won't happen.

>>331770
Oh you're the kike from the Jewish crimes thread, that explains why I recognize your argumentive style. Yeah nice try but no one buys your bullshit.

>>331806
You’re implying there is only one, but that is very off-topic.

>>331808
Ok kike, your political grifts are boring as fuck. Please go back to /mlh/ and stay there.

>>331770
The United States government does that already. I'm not dying for Ukraine.

>>331811
At least the United States has agreed with these other nations to establish their bases on their territories. Otherwise, it would be considered an act of war and the troops stationed there would be expelled by the hosting countries, which they could theoretically do at any time.

In addition, I agree that Ukraine has done some questionable things recently, but Ukraine is in no way, shape, or form in need of total annihilation, since policy reforms could still theoretically happen. Plus, if Ukraine goes, then it is just the first domino out of many that could fall. For example, Russia has a motive to take control of Lithuania and there are still several other border irregularities between former Soviet nations that only make Russia a greater powder keg.

>>331813
We're talking about what the US does at home, not in other countries. Apparently you're too retarded to understand that though

>>331814
OK, but other countries spying on the US is still a violation of US sovereignty. I agree that the Fourth Amendment should be respected more and that people should actively consent to having their data used, but allowing foreign spying entities to spy on Americans is an entirely different story altogether. It is one thing if the US spies on its own citizens, but it is another thing if another country spies on the US’s citizens.

In America, KGB watches you.

In Soviet Russia, KGB still watches you!

>>331816
>You should be more worried about foreign powers spying on you than your own government.
No, the CIA has done more to fuck over the American public during its timeframe than the KGB ever could. I'm not buying into your distractionry psyop when our biggest enemies are domestic government agencies like the CIA and NSA. Glownigger.

>>331817
Would the CIA ever take part in left-wing rallies to draw support to the cause of the Russian Federation? Would they ever threaten to use ransomware attacks on the United States to black out major economic epicenters? Would they spy on American defectors in other countries? Could they do any of this without an exodus of whistleblowers à la Snowden or without any possibility of a congressional subpoena?

This use of whataboutism is getting the situation nowhere, especially if Russia is objectively worse in its international spying and does not punish cyber criminals as harshly as they should be. If Russia takes control over Ukraine, they would gain control over the integral port city of Sevastopol as well as an abundance of natural resources. This is a textbook case of imperialism and greed, especially if Russia can use the ports of Volgograd, Rostov-on-Don, and Vladivostok easily.

>>331813
I don't care. I'm not going to go to war for Ukraine.
I would sooner join Boko Haram than fight over some Slavic shithole.

>>331820
So what if Ukraine falls, Russia gains control over Sevastopol, and other countries are on their hit list? What if they decide that they want control over Lithuania or Georgia next? At what point does it stop? They could eventually gain control over enough nations to have a military force to wipe out that of NATO.

>>331819
The answer is yes:
>The CIA has used it's branches to intentionally sabotage and infiltrate political movements that opposed them by encouraging conflict (COINTELPRO)
>The CIA has considered committing terror attacks on the US public in order to raise public support for wars (Operation Northwoods)
>The CIA took control of the media during the Vietnam War in order to spread pro-war propaganda via news outlets (Operation Mockingbird)
>The CIA ran operations to intentionally sabotage and zubvert anti-war movements in the US (Operation CHAOS)
>The CIA ran experiments on the US public in order to try and create sleeper agents using LSD (Project MKUltra)
>Edward Snowden leaked information about how the NSA and CIA allowed Israeli Unit 8200 to spy on American citizens (Pentagon Papers)
>The CIA gave weapons to the Mexican cartel (Operation Fast and Furious)
>The CIA supplied Al-Qaeda with weaponry during their inception
>The CIA used the Italian and Jewish mafia in order to conduct spying on foreign governments during WWII, and exchange allowed them to exploit the public with immunity from the law (Project Underworld)
You say they never have, but they have. Your ignorance of it isn't an indicator of how smart you are - it's an indicator of how intentionally ignorant you are.

>>331821
>You should fight and die for NATO!
Glow harder.

>>331821
>So what if Ukraine falls, Russia gains control over Sevastopol
Sebastopol has already been under Russian jurisdiction non-stop from ancient Zar times. Nothing has changed except that the peninsula where is located is now Russian territory.
You have to go back newfag.

>>331824
You know, the funny thing is that according to the site moderators this dude has filed around 50+ reports, trying to get people banned for saying things he doesn't like. They even shared a couple of his reports in the trannycord server.

>>331824
>>331823
Shills and retards accomplish the same thing, this is proof we should ideally handle retarded anons as shills, concern trolling is a thing anyways

>>331826
Good point.

>>331822
Try saying anything about the KGB’s imperialist actions and Putin rigging elections and you would find yourself in the gulag system. If Russia invaded your country and imposed its rule on you, you would not be allowed to post lists like that at all and your freedom of speech would be extremely limited.

The truth is the KGB has likely tried doing much of what you mentioned on the list as well, but the CIA gets the spotlight and the massive burden for whatever reason. For example, they supported the foundings of communist governments in Africa and Asia at the expenses of several national sovereignties. They have also supported terrorist groups who align with their viewpoints in order to promote their agenda, going as far as paying off YouTube commenters to comment pro-Russian propaganda and to mass-flag videos about Crimea being part of Ukraine.

Would you like to have your talents wasted by being put in a job where you are “needed” more, but Putin has found someone more qualified to replace you in your current role? Would you like to work for long, hard hours with little to no pay at all and be unable to organize against the practice without being shot? Would you like to have your family constantly worry about where their next meal is coming from?
>>331824
It is still internationally recognized as a part of Ukraine, but my point is that Russia could gain undisputed control in a forced surrender rather than disputed control in an occupation.
>>331825
>>331826
And that is why we must stand up and fight back. Russia and China already send “shills” to do things like this. There was someone in the Jewish crime thread who also reported everything that was written in favor of Israel and Jews, suspecting there to be only one poster of such content despite evidence to the contrary,

>>331828
>Cant debunk that the CIA did said things
>"B-But the KGB!"
Terrible grift

>>331829
>Can’t debunk that the KGB did said things
>“B-But the CIA!”
Terrible grift.

>>331830
Elementary school level argumentive tactics? Check. Next you're gonna call me a poopyhead. Right? Fuck outta here, you have to be 18 to use this site.

>>331831
Just filter if you can't ignore, it's pointless at this point

>>331831
>Elementary school level argumentive tactics? Check.
You mean not unlike what is already going on?
>poopyhead
That would probably be very immature and unproductive, but nothing here is being mature or productive.
>you have to be 18 to use this site.
I have a master’s degree and have legally purchased a bottle of rum recently without the clerk even asking for my ID, so I don’t see how I’m not at least 22 or 23.

>>331832
Yeah I will, I just need a punching bag from time to time.

>>331834
Filter me if you’d like, but no filter will stop the KGB from launching their acts of terror in any form.

Anyway, yeah. This might kick off WWIII but who knows? If it does then you know we're immediately gonna get involved and they'll funnel out thousands of trannies and fags in the US Military in order to die in Ukraine and Russia.

>>331835
If you want to talk about the KGB and its spying practices, please make your own thread. This thread is about potential hot war over the situation in Ukraine.

>>331821
Ukraine is not a NATO country. So long as it is not part of NATO, the United States has no committment to defend it.
And even if it were, I wouldn't really spring to go to war over it.

>>331826
You guys responding to supposed shills without also posting porn seem to have forgotten the purpose of this site.

>>331774
>Russia has no need of a war at all.
I'm less concerned with what Russia will do as I am how NATO will respond. So far it doesn't look like bad because it seems the response is only going to be with (toothless) sanctions.
It does make me wonder what the United States would do if China made the same move on Taiwan. I want war with China even less than Russia.

>>331840
heh heh, sorry, i don't think i should be even posting with the school's machine

>>331838
Said practices could start WWIII, though I think Dashie could put an end to it fast… if only she were real.
>>331840
I like your thinking, but I’m concerned it may not be enough. We may have to worry about it less when there is more automated content moderation, but keeping them busy in the John could be a good first step, though they can always shill some more when they leave.
>>331841
The response with China would probably be similar.

>>331843
So long as there's no war, I don't really care what happens on the other side of the world.

>>331678
Nothing will happen, this will just be more postering nothing more.

Kek

Gentleman, let's be honest ww3 is around the corner and it has been a honour to shitpost with you

I won't get drafted because I'm epileptic. Haha.

>>331877
If anything, you have more to worry about dying within your own borders than a frontline somewhere.

>>331877
WW3 wont happen over this. Hell it wont happen in our lifetime since the globohomo jews wont let it happen.

>>331844
Even if it means some KGB agent sees what you just wrote and decides to post it all over the Internet or something? Even if they know exactly who you are and try to follow you, all while not causing a war?

>>331828
nigger i dont want to be ruled by the kgb OR the cia

>>331883
But the problem is we have to pick one of them.

>>331885
But the kgb and cia are jewish

>>331886
Even if that were true, we must still choose the lesser of two evils. They both simply are not going to go away without a guarantee of the other going away, since dissolving one agency would be an outward display of weakness and cowardice. Both the CIA and KGB would need to dissolve simultaneously if either of them were to be dissolved at all.

Since that isn’t happening anytime soon, we must learn to deal with the lesser of two evils. The CIA has had numerous changes in leadership because of the change in executive power, but the KGB has been under Putin’s control for over 20 years.

>>331885
That is a false dichotomy. I support neither.

>>331888
This sounds like something a glownigger would say.

>>331888
>They both simply are not going to go away without a guarantee of the other going away
So I should support one evil institution or another, perpetuating a system under which neither has fallen? Wait for one to absorb the other on their terms? Where is my path to victory? What are my win conditions? Red team isn't going to be substantially weaker if I drop my support for them when they defeat blue team. Red team isn't going to be any less hostile because I supported them against blue team. Sure, conditions under red team or blue team would probably be different in some ways, but they are both hostile forces that should be attacked with every opportunity. You choose the lesser of two evils when you have no hope for victory, but I, for one, refuse to give up hope.

>>331900
We 'jakkin'?

>>331729
>Chinese and Russians give a fuck what random americans are doing.
>Our own government in conjunction with tech companies aren't already cataloging every action we make according to the Snowden leaks.
Meds and Sproke NOW.

>>331863
KEK

>>331877
/)

>>331889
>>331898
Look at it this way: until the monitoring system goes online, glown*ggers will continue to monitor us and people will report posts just because they support one political viewpoint or another. We are being f*cked by hook or by crook, but the question is whether we’d rather have it done by people from our own country and whom we can easily draw investigations on or from people in a land where no citizen of our country has any control over and whose spy agency will likely see no reforms at all.
>>331899
Forty cakes.
>>331903
The proof has already been revealed by both the FBI and YouTuber LaoWhy86.

>>331762
I'd rather have my info in the hands of the Russians and Chinese who are halfway around the world and can do fuck-all with that info even if they had it. The US on the other hand will make you face repercussions for even making an edgy joke.

>>331907
So would Russia and China. In fact, they would probably be even more intense.

In America, you get cancelled.

In Soviet Russia, you go to gulag.

>>331908
>In Soviet Russia, you go to gulag
And you niggers must be so eager to step up your game to that level

https://www.independentsentinel.com/january-6-protesters-are-being-tortured-many-held-for-minor-offenses/

>>331908
Wake me up when Russia or China sends Americans to gulags. Until then I don't give a fuck about what they're doing.

>>331909
>Using a news source that is outwardly political and biased
Cringe.
>>331910
Wakey, wakey. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/06/02/politics/paul-whelan-cnn-biden-putin-summit/index.html

>>331914
>cnn
Literally even RT is more trustworthy

>>331915
CNN isn’t the only entity who has covered this. https://www.state.gov/third-anniversary-of-paul-whelans-detention-in-russia/

>>331914
And yet I hear of no Americans in Russian gulags, only in American ones.

>>331917
>willful ignorance
Read the articles. You will find out soon enough.

>>331916
So...a glownigger was sent to the gulag?

>>331918
>You will find out soon enough
I fear no Guantánamo faggot, bring it on

>1 thread away, bitching about saging
>ITT, massive (you)s to the jewfag
Anons, discipline yourselves

>>331743
I thought I had the others, let me search for it. The boomers even photocopied it.

>>331813
Did Iraq ask for a USA military base? This entire Russia thing is the exact same as back then. There were no weapons of mass destruction, it was a proven fraud. 100k troops is not enough to take over Ukraine and they are only there to defend Russia from the spillover Should Nato decide to attack Donbass. This is essentially all a false flag operation to start WWIII and get us killed.

Yeah, you see now guys? This is what I've been dealing with for months - my autism just refuses to let me ignore the cunt though unless I filter the posts.

>>331921
So you want the CIA to dissolve, but you also would be OK with the KGB holding you as a political prisoner in an occurrence the CIA would have been able to prevent? If you are still proud of what the US stands for, you sound pretty hypocritical.
>>331925
If Iraq did not ask for them, they can expel American soldiers as they would any other diplomat and declare war on the US or issue OPEC sanctions if they do not comply.

>>331925
>start WWIII and get us killed.
Don't worry, most CIA and kike fat cats calling the shots live in Florida, they don't want to be killed either.
Also it is a psyop to terrorize and distract the population.
In the event of some Ukrainian local gunfight, expect NATO and the US to make a HUGE deal of it with the usual consultations, reassurances, promises, threats, and the rest of the portfolio. But it won't go beyond that.

>>331835
>KGB from launching their acts of terror
And then you woke up.

>>331835
>but no filter will stop the KGB from launching their acts of terror in any form.
Is the KGB here with us?

>>331934
According to an FBI report from 2010. Though they have changed their name throughout their history a lot, so they may be hard to track down.

>>331906
I would rather be spied on by the KGB by a long shot because they are in Russia and I am not.

>>331935
>According to an FBI
Credibility remaining: 0 (zero)

>>331908
You won't get cancelled by the CIA if you're a foreigner who pisses them off, you just get hit by a drone strike. They can't do the same on US soil for obvious reasons.

>>331938
If you're a domestic party who pisses them off, you just end up committing suicide via two gunshots to the back of your head.

>>331936
And you’d also be fine with having your computer infected with ransomware, your local power grid going down, Pravda reporting everything about you, your YouTube videos demonetized, your friends spied on as well, and either your or your friends’ lives in danger?
>>331938
At least you’re allowed to say that because the CIA is protecting your right to free speech. The KGB would do that or any of the other things I’ve mentioned. Though isn’t the UP railroad in Los Angeles considering doing something like that?
>>331939
I think you are referring to a scene in “The Naked Gun”.

>>331939
Exactly. The CIA is far worse than any other intelligence agency and it routinely works against it's own people. The CIA should be abolished.

>>331941
I am saying those are all things the KGB either does or supports, not the CIA. Even if they were caught doing that, there would be congressional oversight that would stop them from doing so, but no such oversight would exist for the KGB if it is all under Putin’s control.

“Every country has its own mafia. In Russia, the mafia has its own country.” -Garry Kasparov

>>331940
>You're only safe and free because glowniggers are secretly protecting you.
It's officially over. You can stop trying now.

>>331943
No, it’s not over. I have witnessed and read about what the KGB is trying to do and/or support. If the CIA were to let its guard down, the USA would quickly become the East Kamčatka Kraj.

>>331943
Just filter him.

>>331940
Not sure if this is trolling or you are on crack.
Damn.

>>331946
It’s neither. Here is a report by Analyst1 that details their involvement in ransomware attacks and hacking. https://analyst1.com/file-assets/Nationstate_ransomware_with_consecutive_endnotes.pdf

>>331947
>ransomware attacks and hacking
So? What has to do with Ukraine?
Wait! Is the KGB involved?
.............
Do you work in CNN?

>>331949
First, the report says that the developer of a banking Trojan named Zeus, Evgeniy Bogachev, was apprehended by Ukrainian law enforcement and he was working under supervision of the KGB. Second, if Russia can do that, who knows what they will do anywhere else? And no, I am not from CNN.

>>331950
Yeah you're right. Russia is so bad and scary. Best not to piss them off and just be allies instead.

>>331950
>Ukrainian law enforcement
You are a faggot. The Ukrainians are under direct CIA and Mossad control and are so trusted as the South Koreans: a lie after another lie, after another lie, after... perhaps they will stop when the funding dries up.

>>331953
I'm not saying the the hacker is an angel, but to conflate criminal activity with political one is a loooooong strech, aka cheap and sloppy propaganda.
This is the main reason why the western media and the "unnamed sources" lost their last traces of credibility.

>>331952
That would be the ideal situation, but it is hard to be Allies with a government who is actively spying on everyone and jailing their own journalists. Russia needs to step away from irredentism and Soviet-era policies and embrace the change that a lack of authoritarianism brings. It worked out pretty well for Estonia and Finland, so why can’t Russia do it?
>>331953
Some here say everything is controlled by them, so I don’t necessarily believe that claim. Plus, it would still give Russia a motive for action in Ukraine.

>>331956
>Some here say everything is controlled by them, so I don’t necessarily believe that claim. Plus, it would still give Russia a motive for action in Ukraine.
And the funny thing is.... Russia too. Both sides of the same coin.
Mossad/Israel and Russia have tight links. The common denominator is the Chabad-Lubavitch sect.

>>331956
We need to jail our own journalists. And Russia spies on the US so they can learn were not to be in case of a drone strike from a crazy neocon or democrat puppet.

>>331959
>We need to jail our own journalists.
It is unconstitutional for anyone to be jailed without the right to a fair trial. Jailing a journalist because he opposes the government is antithetical to the free speech many users of this site claim they promote.

>>331960
>It is unconstitutional for anyone to be jailed without the right to a fair trial.
Say that to the January 6 political prisoners.

>>331961
You mean the people who took part in a communist revolution against the government of the USA? Many of them are still at large because no one can be detained arbitrarily.

>>331962
Not even the MSM is retarded enough to think it was a communist revolution.

>>331964
That faggot is the apex of trolling.

>>331964
>>331965
Think about it: Trump was brown-nosing Putin, Xi, and Kim all throughout his term and was enacting policies that hurt America’s allies more so than its enemies, going as far as turning a blind eye to the Uighur slave labor in Xinjiang.

He has also refused to invoke the Insurrection Act on rioters and looters in America’s cities, forcing their governments to compromise with them and accept their newfound power. In a way, Trump has enabled the rioting and looting to continue by refusing to act against it.

In addition, he also called for the government taking ownership stakes in all companies it bails out, which would effectively outlaw private industry in its entirety, since all businesses took very massive hits during the pandemic. With this amount of power, why would the government allow companies to buy back their stock if they could just as easily cling to their power and earn more profits in the long term?

There was also the Lafayette Square protest incident in which civilians were peacefully protesting and attacked by the National Guard. The only shots fired were from the military and the military alone, so there was no reason for them to even fire without a warning at all. And yes, it is very ironic that Trump would be more interested in using the military against a crowd of peaceful protesters than against a crowd of rioters.

During the November 2020 election, not only did Trump support movements to restrict access to the ballot in states that already had tough restrictions, he refused to even try to act on new restrictions in states with fewer of them. Polling places in my home state were all only mysteriously announced two weeks ahead of the election and no one knew how far they would have to drive. We did get mail-in ballots, though they may not have as great of integrity as in-person voting does if each resident can be identified on each envelope.

And just as the votes were being counted, he organized a march on the Capitol to protest the election results, only for it to turn into a revolution “for the people” and an attempt to overthrow the US government. I personally don’t think he was the mastermind behind it thanks to his statements about not hurting anyone, but he clearly still played an influential role in shaping the failed coup.

Trump has mimicked the tactics of the communist dictators of yesteryear through action or inaction. He could have done things about the situation in this country when he chose instead to go on Twitter and make false promises and tau-tau to America’s enemies. Through this evidence, I believe that Trump may very well be a communist himself.

>>331966
>crowd of rioters
Ahem.
Do you know those rioters are the owners of the land and government employees are their servants?
By kidnapped them, the employees committed the most heinous crime and their tenure is null and void.
You got your bearings upside down.

>>331967
I am fully aware that it is the government’s duty to serve the people, but they did not do a very good job at doing so if rioters and looters were able to get away with stealing other people’s items and destroying other people’s property. What works best for a rioter does not work best for the rest of society, since incidents of rioting could cause businesses to close up shop and force people in the affected areas to commute great distances if their stocks don’t tank enough already. The businesses all have insurance, yes, but that alone would justify any incident of stealing anyone else’s property or perhaps even killing someone.

>>331968
Let's face it, the problem of street violence has its roots on the crazy concept of the bureaucracy claiming a monopoly on violence. If every citizen is armed without any restriction, the criminals will be extinct in a very short lapse.
No jails, no parasitical judges and mercenaries needed.

>>331970
So is this why the Democrats want to pass new racist gun laws… and why the Republicans refuse to use their powers to step in when they can?

>>331971
It is about the maximize chaos and criminality while punishing the suckers abiding by their rules.

>>331940
Did anybody said, Pravda?

>>331678
>67b7b11
What a fednigger.
I'm not even going to call you a glownigger because that would imply that you're somewhat competent.

>>331678
Ukraine won't spark the war.
>US threatens Russia using NATO
>Russia uses force
>US reprisals
>Russia deploys arm drops on US soil
>China activates Canadian reserves
And that's just the military actions.
The US stock market is in the middle of instability at the time of this post.
The chinks could just dump it and cause massive social unrest in 72 hours.
Or 400 pound hackers could delay the distribution of EBT and social security deposits for the same effect.

>>331678
TWO MORE WEEKS AMERICA
TWO MORE WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEKS

>>332003
I'm just waiting for something to happen...

>>332011
Not going to happen.

>>332015
At this rate I'm ging to die rom boredom...

>>332011
If some gunfight happens, it will be extinguished very fast.
The goal of this psyop is to force the European Union to replace Russian gas for US and Arab Gas, and not about invasions or anything of that sort.
Oligarchs' greed is the reason of the US poking Russia.
$$$$$$$$$$$

>>332018
Wait, what exactly is the psyop?

>>332019
I had to clarify. My bad.
The psyop is toward domestic populations in order to keep the fear going. Now it is nuclear war.
Think about it, Korean nukes, asteroids, terrorism, rampant crime, racial tensions, epidemics, now war, and so on and on. They are all broadcasted by State media and the same way they pop up, they disappear until a new crisis is brought forward again.
If you look at the pattern of crisis pumped by MSM it gets interesting.

>>332021
Krautfren...your vpn wear off

>>332022
Hush hush.

>>332021
Also I had to add that to replace the cheap pipeline delivered Russian gas for very expensive trans-ocean shipped liquefied US gas, a heavy propaganda campaign must be executed on the European population to paint Russia as an aggressor and justify the supplier change and price increase.

>>332035
>pic
Remade.

>>332021
Do you think recent aggressions by Russia are also part of the psyop?
I don't down the media response is, but Russia's behavior seems real.

>>332063
I think Putin is on board too, he is World Economic Forum conspirator after all.
If you look at the chessboard you will notice that the freemasons at the upper echelon are executing the Agenda 2030 plan. Meaning NWO and its consequences: trans-humanism plus global governance.
Agenda 2030 demands to reduce the carbon footprint to a "sustainable" level, that means that the industrial world and its useless eaters gotta go.
Looking at what's going on in Europe, you will notice that the same Europeans (((oligarchs))) are sabotaging their energy sources (Germany and France shutting down their nuclear plants for example), the Chinese are sabotaging their own exports by closing again their main ports under the excuse of a virus, which of course will cripple still more the global supply chain.
After this Ukraine crisis, it is very probable Russian gas will be cut off or greatly diminished; and because a modern civilization cannot continue without cheap energy sources to power the technological devices and industries, a drastic collapse of quality of life can be expected. And all this organized chaos is done on purpose.

>>332065
>the (((freemasons))) at the upper echelon
Ftfy

>>332065
Europe has had to live with gas being $8 per gallon even before NordStream 2. Though there have been some protests against high gas prices and taxes, it is still a fact of European life nonetheless. However, this issue may become less and less important with the continued production and adoption of electric vehicles and Russia may be planning even worse.

>>332065
All of the superpowers are definitely in the pocket of ZOG, but idk how they could coordinate such a psyop with the precision you imply.
Putin has his own independent motivations for making this move

>>332065
>Looking at what's going on in Europe, you will notice that the same Europeans (((oligarchs))) are sabotaging their energy sources (Germany and France shutting down their nuclear plants for example), the Chinese are sabotaging their own exports by closing again their main ports under the excuse of a virus, which of course will cripple still more the global supply chain.
This sounds ridiculous, but I can think of no better reason for why those nuclear plants are being shut down other than manufacturered energy scarcity. This is happening at the same time they're talking about climate change.
Nuclear energy could save our civilization if it weren't for all of the absurd gatekeeping and fear mongering.

>>332065
>After this Ukraine crisis, it is very probable Russian gas will be cut off or greatly diminished; and because a modern civilization cannot continue without cheap energy sources to power the technological devices and industries, a drastic collapse of quality of life can be expected.
What motive would they have to drop quality of life in Europe?

>>332072
Probably the same reason NordStream 2 was implemented: a lack of resources and power would mean that more dominant factions can have their way in the ensuing chaos.

>>332082
But the dominant factors already have all of the power. What's the point?

>>332083
There is never enough power for them and they always want more.

>>332082
> would mean that more dominant factions can have their way in the ensuing chaos.
Mostly right, but remember that chaos is always bad for the dominant faction, when you are on top you always look for stability, the preservation of the status quo is YOUR preservation.
What they did with rona on the other hand, was fear-mongering and gaslighting with little actual pay-off (the low mortality rate of the virus), the chaos was only a brewing storm they could willfully control and which never materialized, nevertheless, being enough to strip the scared massed off their freedom.

>>332086
Yeah, but there needs to be a method to the madness. This makes little sense.

>>332067
But what about the reports linking the KGB to ongoing spying, etc. incidents?
>>332087
But shouldn’t there also be a mechanism to prevent the chaos from happening again? This economic downturn could have been much worse than it was, since we have seen a time when it actually was. The then-president implemented his New Deal program to make sure Americans could survive the downturn and mitigate future ones.
>>332088
It is simple: Russia should not have put a former KGB lieutenant colonel in the position of Prime Minister, since he has only prevented Russia from becoming like Estonia in terms of abandoning Soviet-era policies and societal development. Instead, the current government is adopting irredentist policies of expanding its influence over the territories it once had control over and venting the built-up anger against its enemies. And have I mentioned that absolute power corrupts absolutely?

>>332095
Stop it with this KGB bullshit. Everyone knows that Putin is KGB. That's not relevant to the conversation.

Going back to the topic, it's likely that Russia would cut of gas to europe in response to economic sanctions, to try to squeeze them back.

>>332096
I know that everyone knows, but I was trying to say that Putin should never have been chosen.

>>332097
Sure.

>>332097
I really don't care about Russia "should" have done though. I'm only concerned with what's going to happen in the immediate future.

>>332030
I can't believe this got buried... Maybe this should be split into multiple threads.

>>332097
Seethe fed boy

>>332095
>reports linking the KGB to ongoing spying
I know, I know. Unnamed sources again.

>>331825
what in-between his love of cut penis? I don't really give a shit if he has to beat autists away with a stick if he's fine with child mutilation.

>>332113
There are primary sources including some YouTubers who were directly affected and the FBI, who found out the spies. Why do I have to keep repeating myself?
>>332120
I’m surprised that no one has so far been banned for spamming the reporting system. Lotus had already said that all political opinions were accepted, even those that are pro-Jew and pro-Israel, so why does this person still think it is OK to report posts based on their political opinions alone?

>>332129
We all know the KGB is spying: that's literally their job. You don't have to remind us.

>>331825
What trannycord server?

>>332142
I’ve no idea, but there was a guy in the Jewish Crime thread who reported dozens of pro-Israel and anti-antisemitic posts simply because he disagreed with them.

>>332148
Some of those posts were derailing.
On that note, please keep the conversation ok the topic of Ukraine.

>>332151
It does not necessarily have to be about Ukraine if it could be anything that causes a Third World War.

>I have no idea
as though there needed to be more evidence that the jewfag is a newfaggot

>>332148
Your posts were reported because they were intentionally derailing the thread - like you've been trying to do here. Either talk about the Ukraine-Russia conflict or piss off.

>>332152
This thread was made in context of the Ukraine situation and it's consequences. Perhaps that wasn't clear, but other topics would be better off in their own threads.

I can say right now, as a fighting age American, I refuse to participate in my corrupt government's war. If the glowies want their strategic victory so bad, they can pick up a rifle and fight their own damn conflict. My people have been mistreated for years by elites that hate us and want to replace us. I will not lay down my life for anyone but my blood relatives.

I am sure there are many other people who are in a similar state of mind. Leftists are too weak and mentally deficient to handle combat, and rightists have no reason to want to participate in this fight. Only the dumbest fucking stooges could be convinced to actually fight in WW3. If they try and start a war, I think it's more likely the country will erupt in civil war and the entire thing will break down instantly. People will flee the cities in anticipation of nuclear exchange, supply lines will break down, it'll be chaos.

>>332181
So what happens if Congress authorizes a draft and you have a chance at being conscripted?

>>332195
Act spergingly racist and autistic so they don't let me in.

>>332195
become Amish or a monk and claim your religion doesn't believe in military service, it's how Mitt Romney evaded the draft.

>>332199
Ooh, that's a good one. Maybe I'll become Mormon and marry all the lonely gfs of all of the zogbot cucks who get sent out to die in Siberia.

>>332195
I have epilepsy, for that reason I cannot get drafted. What do I win?

>>332208
Epilepsy.

>>332223
>Norway
>Waste + Other sources
Read ~100% Electricity and Wood Stoves

Why the fuck can't they just go nuclear? They could completely break their dependence on foreign fuel if they built more nuclear power plants.

>>332223
Nuclear is the best net zero system.

>>332227
>Why the fuck can't they just go nuclear?
Because Agenda 2030 demands that the First Word transitions to a third word status. By strangling the energy supply the energy demand cannot be satisfied and the consequent out of control spiraling costs will collapse the demand.

>>332229
I guess so...
Nuclear energy could save our civilization, but glowniggers and kikes don't want us to have it.

>>332229
>By strangling the energy supply the energy demand cannot be satisfied and the consequent out of control spiraling costs will collapse the demand.
This is the key factor.
Putin, European leaders, and US leaders are all playing the WEF' script while taking nations hostage and also for a ride because of the (nobody cares) "Russian Aggression".

>Putin Has The Power To Intensify Europe’s Energy Crisis
>Europe’s energy crisis has already cost governments tens of billions of dollars and a looming confrontation with Russia would only make that worse.
>European households are already set to see a 54% increase in the cost of gas and electricity despite the best efforts by governments to keep prices down
>Russia provides about 40% of Europe’s natural gas, and if Russia does invade Ukraine and European governments respond with sanctions, there is a chance that supply could be cut off
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Putin-Has-The-Power-To-Intensify-Europes-Energy-Crisis.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8IQLGJOEK4

>>332261
In that case, there may need to be something like the Berlin Airlift to last Europe through the winter, since Russia could potentially take everything east of Kiev within the time it would take for the weather to become warmer, at least according to this video. https://youtu.be/Z9c_HhpvBpg

My opinion? They could possibly do it without even firing one bullet if they hit the right locations with ransomware and/or divide up the population between ethnic Ukrainians and ethnic Russians just right. Ukraine needs to show Russia that they are one nation united and Russia needs to realize that the west is capable of launching cyber attacks themselves, especially if Wannacry and Stuxnet both originated from software developed by the US government.

>>332270
>ransomware
No wonder how horsefuckers got into hasbro's servers so often

>>332270
>there may need to be something like the Berlin Airlift to last Europe through the winter
FUCK NO! They have the GDP to cover their own energy bills, pipeline or no pipeline. American taxpayers do not need to pick up that bill.

>>332261
>>Europe’s energy crisis has already cost governments tens of billions of dollars and a looming confrontation with Russia would only make that worse.
This is largely self-inflicted by the phasing out of fossil fuels and the rollback if nuclear energy.

>>332273
WTF I love hackers now.

>>332173
Why do American troops have to bear this burden? Why can't other European countries do it it they're so worried?

>>332297
Who?

>>332279
But Europe has historically been a resource-poor continent that has had to colonize other countries to obtain their resources. Even if they had the money, there would still need to be a viable supplier.
>>332283
Because the US has an interest in the matter as well and they have to do whatever it takes. If Russia does succeed in invading Ukraine, whom else are they going to invade? Could it perhaps justify or inspire a Chinese invasion of Hong Kong or Taiwan?
>>332283
Ukraine’s military is grossly underprepared for this conflict. It is up to the world to make sure Russia’s irredentist agenda does not come to fruition.

>>332313
>Even if they had the money, there would still need to be a viable supplier.
Tey can buy if from us if they want, for the market price. If that's too expensive, they'll have to cut their socialist spending. They're rich enough to give healthcare to all of their citizens, so they clearly don't need handouts from us. Their taxpayers can pick up the bill.
>they have to do whatever it takes
No. We don't. It's not our concern.
Anyone else could do it if they cared.
We have zero obligation to interfere. Ukraine is not part of NATO, so it's not our problem.
There's a genocide going on in China, ethnic cleansing in Palestine, and an untold number of imminent civil wars in Africa: do we interfere with those too? It's not our fucking problem.
>whom else are they going to invade?
Slippery slope fallacy.
Countries afraid of being invaded should spend more to defend themselves, because it's not our problem.
>muh Taiwan/HK
Still don't care.

>>332313
>Ukraine’s military is grossly underprepared for this conflict.
How is that our problem? They had decades to join NATO if they wanted backup, but they didn't. It is not our obligation to assist countries that aren't even formally allied with us, and even allies have their limits.
>It is up to the world
No it fucking is it. I reject your arbitrary assertions of responsibility on me. If you think it's so important, go fix it yourself.
>irredentist
I would say the same thing about Israeli-occupied Palestine, but that's an argument for another thread.

>>332314
>#1
Increases in taxes like that could only cause some of them to defect to Russia, especially if they try to engage in psychological warfare by lowering their taxes.
>#2
It is indeed our concern. The United States has at least $1.7 million worth of conservation efforts in Ukraine and several American citizens there as part of the Peace Corps, with my once-removed cousin being one of them. Also, there is also arguably genocide and ethnic cleansing going on in Russia.
>#3
But one concern is that countries cannot entirely be defended from within, especially if Russia’s ally, Belarus, could easily attack the other Baltic states and then the nearby islands of other nations.
>#4
>t. Communist
>t. Imperialist
>t. Someone who wants his device to become more expensive if TSMC falls under PRC control
>>332315
>#1
>#2
Because Ukraine shares a border with countries we are aligned with and the downfall of Ukraine could be the downfall of our other allies. It could also lead to the persecutions of Ukrainian-Americans, such as two of my friends from high school, including the “girlfriend” of someone whom I had a crush on.
>#3
Pretty much any claim to the land in question is irredentist at this point. There is so much fighting going on that I fear the region may eventually become South Chechnya or West Xinjiang.

>>332322
>Increases in taxes like that could only cause some of them to defect to Russia
If that's how it's going to be, so be it. I'm not paying for it.
If that's all it takes for them to do that, they weren't our allies in the first place.
>has at least $1.7 million worth of conservation efforts in Ukraine
Then maybe we shouldn't.
>American citizens there
They can leave.
>there is also arguably genocide and ethnic cleansing going on in Russia
Boo hoo. Not my problem.
>countries cannot entirely be defended from within
Wow. Sucks to be them.
Not my problem.
>Ukraine shares a border with countries we are aligned with
Then let them do it themselves.
>persecutions of Ukrainian-Americans
WTF do I care about the feelings of Slavs?
>two of my friends from high school, including the “girlfriend” of someone whom I had a crush on.
Sucks to be you. Not my problem.

>>332328
>>332328
>If that's how it's going to be, so be it. I'm not paying for it.
>If that's all it takes for them to do that, they weren't our allies in the first place.
First, the point of allyship is to establish trust between nations and have provisions between nations about things such as economics and defense, especially if one nation is doing poorer. Ukraine basically has no choice but to become aligned with the west lest it lose its sovereignty.
>Then maybe we shouldn’t.
So Chernobyl Reactor #4 should be free to leak radiation into Eastern Europe and affect people’s food and water supplies? If Russia is a major exporter of gasoline, you could even find yourself with a radioactive gas tank.
>They can leave.
What if they have well-established friends or family there and pulling them away from them is too much?
>Boo hoo. Not my problem.
And ethnic cleansing in Palestine is? According to you, it seems as though it should not be your problem if it is on the other side of the world, but the Palestinian conflict is also on the other side of the world,
>Then let them do it themselves.
>Sucks to be you. Not my problem.
You are assuming that all countries have the capabilities to defend themselves and that people have the physical freedom to leave at any time. This sounds like arrogance and a lack of compassion on your part.
>WTF do I care about the feelings of Slavs?
How do you know you are not a Slav yourself? And what have they done wrong?

>>332328
Just filter.

>>332330
>one nation is doing poorer
Europeans are not poor.
Ukraine is not our ally. They have never claimed to be our ally.
>Chernobyl
Let the Russians handle it.
>well-established friends
Sucks for them. Still not my problem.
>Palestine
Not my problem either.
I just brought it up as another example.
>lack of compassion
Since when is it my responsibility to take care of the rest of the world? My tax money is for Americans only.

>>332333
Trips of truth. I'll do that.

>>332334
>Europeans are not poor.
I meant poor in resources such as technology, military, and natural resources.
>Since when is it my responsibility to take care of the rest of the world? My tax money is for Americans only.
What is the alternative? Would you rather have Russia or China do it? If the world hears of the US leaving the international stage as a world policeman, such as what happened in South Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, then terrorist cells would only grow and make the world worse.

>>332496
How do you know that the news won’t be taken as an indication that more needs to be done? And Russia is moving some troops away from Ukraine.

>>332171
If I remeber right, Montenegro joined as well back in 2015 or so

>>332496
But doesn't America have the biggest military in the world?
Will this piss USA off and convince it to stop funding NATO/UN?

>>332504
>America have the biggest military in the world
Already spread too thing around the world and relaying on "allies" to maintain a presence.
America military is only impressive against ragtag armies.

>>332496
Hail Putin, Hail Victory

>>332504
>>332506
It has the world’s second-largest army by active duty troops and the world’s largest global presence, but there is an issue of whether the US should move troops from one side of the globe to another and/or how long it would take to do so. A draft may not be out of the question if US forces were being overwhelmed or a proxy war were not enough. The troops being sent to Ukraine are apparently not combat troops, though, but they are merely there to instruct Ukrainian troops on how to use the equipment the US is providing them.