Staff and Jannies and Administrators have had their hands tied in a measure of good faith, and so when the users see what is wrong in their hearts they speak out.
By the rules the community crafted to ensure our everything didn't become a shithole, they cover most of the known issues.
But not all, and that is where tension occurs.
As many considered age old shitposting tactics, which usually do work with correcting hostile behavior to the whole of /mlpol/.
Until it doesn't.
We don't yet have rules which directly address that kind of bullshit so the staff and go staff and know the community is behind them in support.
I'm proposing a new rule the Faggot Clause. Maybe Lurk moar fagget.
Proportional banning/tempban/kick/shitposty-retaliation/unusual-punishment for faggotry.
We all know what it is, because we've experienced this with long time users that degrade the whole experience for everyone. It boils down to they don't lurk as in there is no assimilation to our imageboard culture.
If they've successfully lurked and listened to suggestions they wouldn't be faggots.
It's gatekeeping to prevent the values of the imageboard from being taken over.
Rabid individualism without teamwork doesn't work. And lecherous collectivism with no individual also can't work.
/mlpol/ is a slice of something magical, politics and ponies and anons shitposting, talking and having a grand time without bots, shills, crazy SJW types, dindus, spam, /ptg or hyper cancer nu-fags.
Suggestions and community support is required if you too want something like this.
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
1712609469_1.jpg (99.5 KB, 654x386, 0026D593CAAC8986470B5205F15879BE-101842.jpg)
1712609469_3.png (13.2 KB, 819x460, 9935F1FA87D67FA634DACF825BF30A99-13522.png)
1712609469_4.gif (438.8 KB, 283x400, 004AE36014A8766CAA3207F33392F0F6-449312.gif)
127 replies and 69 files omitted.
>>8850
We've built up thousands of bans over the years, mostly from the raiders who used to nuke the catalog every single day.
If you can't cite any specifics, there's really no way we can accept what you claim as fact.
We've built up thousands of bans over the years, mostly from the raiders who used to nuke the catalog every single day.
If you can't cite any specifics, there's really no way we can accept what you claim as fact.
>>8851
>What you're talking about doesn't ring a bell for me, and you're being vague and evasive, so I guess I have no choice but to just call bullshit
This, tbh
>What you're talking about doesn't ring a bell for me, and you're being vague and evasive, so I guess I have no choice but to just call bullshit
This, tbh
>>8853
>If you can't cite any specifics, there's really no way we can accept what you claim as fact.
I have been repeating this a few times during the hoaxdemic in the /qa/ board while arguing with (you) exactly about the same topic as this bread, you didn't pay attention it seems.
>If you can't cite any specifics, there's really no way we can accept what you claim as fact.
I have been repeating this a few times during the hoaxdemic in the /qa/ board while arguing with (you) exactly about the same topic as this bread, you didn't pay attention it seems.
1712626692.png (1.6 MB, 1065x1063, Screenshot_2024-04-08_005249.png)
>>8803
>>8855
You know, all this aside, you're claiming that the OP is trying to "return to" this supposed era of mass-banning that only you know about, when at face value there wasn't any sort of policy change to leave that era.
Mods have, for as long as we know, almost never banned anyone but overt raiders and bots. The fact that we're even having this conversation is proof that they don't discipline people for simply shitposting, no matter how obnoxious it is. You're claims that changing this status quo would mean a return to an era of mass-banning is self-defeating.
>>8855
You know, all this aside, you're claiming that the OP is trying to "return to" this supposed era of mass-banning that only you know about, when at face value there wasn't any sort of policy change to leave that era.
Mods have, for as long as we know, almost never banned anyone but overt raiders and bots. The fact that we're even having this conversation is proof that they don't discipline people for simply shitposting, no matter how obnoxious it is. You're claims that changing this status quo would mean a return to an era of mass-banning is self-defeating.
>>8856
Allright.
Threads where I was arguing were:
https://mlpol.net/qa/8462
https://mlpol.net/qa/4126
https://mlpol.net/qa/8629
https://mlpol.net/qa/8541
https://mlpol.net/qa/7990
https://mlpol.net/qa/5974
https://mlpol.net/qa/6135
https://mlpol.net/qa/7314
https://mlpol.net/qa/6590
https://mlpol.net/qa/6736
https://mlpol.net/qa/6719
https://mlpol.net/qa/5810
Those are 1,000s of posts to read.
[Read more] Allright.
Threads where I was arguing were:
https://mlpol.net/qa/8462
https://mlpol.net/qa/4126
https://mlpol.net/qa/8629
https://mlpol.net/qa/8541
https://mlpol.net/qa/7990
https://mlpol.net/qa/5974
https://mlpol.net/qa/6135
https://mlpol.net/qa/7314
https://mlpol.net/qa/6590
https://mlpol.net/qa/6736
https://mlpol.net/qa/6719
https://mlpol.net/qa/5810
Those are 1,000s of posts to read.
>>8843
>Just telling an autistic person "stop being a newfag or will ban you" tells him nothing about what he did wrong or what behavior needs to be changed to fit in. It's better to give specific directions and feedback as to how exactly to stop being an excessive faggot.
The catch-22 here is that the most extreme autists don't generally respond to specific directions or feedback any better than they respond to someone just calling them a faggot. How many different times did Nigel have it explained to him, in plain English, exactly what he was doing wrong and what he would need to do to correct it? Did he ever listen? For that matter, Boom Boom has also had the negative aspects of his behavior pointed out to him, and all it does is make him double down on his persecution complex. As we are currently witnessing in real time.
>>8852
>The messages informing of the blocked IP and the reason why are part of the /mlpol/ code.
See, this is exactly what makes me suspicious about your claim. The only user who would see a message detailing reasons for a ban would be the banned user. Unless the staff chose to put a "User was banned" message on a specific post, the rest of the board would not have any way to see that a user has been banned. In other words, these banned users you keep bringing up are actually you. You are complaining that you yourself were banned, but are trying to make it look like other users were banned along with you.
[Read more] >Just telling an autistic person "stop being a newfag or will ban you" tells him nothing about what he did wrong or what behavior needs to be changed to fit in. It's better to give specific directions and feedback as to how exactly to stop being an excessive faggot.
The catch-22 here is that the most extreme autists don't generally respond to specific directions or feedback any better than they respond to someone just calling them a faggot. How many different times did Nigel have it explained to him, in plain English, exactly what he was doing wrong and what he would need to do to correct it? Did he ever listen? For that matter, Boom Boom has also had the negative aspects of his behavior pointed out to him, and all it does is make him double down on his persecution complex. As we are currently witnessing in real time.
>>8852
>The messages informing of the blocked IP and the reason why are part of the /mlpol/ code.
See, this is exactly what makes me suspicious about your claim. The only user who would see a message detailing reasons for a ban would be the banned user. Unless the staff chose to put a "User was banned" message on a specific post, the rest of the board would not have any way to see that a user has been banned. In other words, these banned users you keep bringing up are actually you. You are complaining that you yourself were banned, but are trying to make it look like other users were banned along with you.
>>8858
Ponerpics is still buggy, has a bunch of redundant images, and the ratings system is non-existent. That's a discussion for another thread though.
Also these pics were saved a long time ago.
Ponerpics is still buggy, has a bunch of redundant images, and the ratings system is non-existent. That's a discussion for another thread though.
Also these pics were saved a long time ago.
>>8860
>Boom Boom has also had the negative aspects of his behavior pointed out to him, and all it does is make him double down on his persecution complex.
He even did it in this thread with the /s, ffs.
>Boom Boom has also had the negative aspects of his behavior pointed out to him, and all it does is make him double down on his persecution complex.
He even did it in this thread with the /s, ffs.
>>8857
>The fact that we're even having this conversation is proof that they don't discipline people for simply shitposting, no matter how obnoxious it is
I was banned just for posting a meme in the Flat Earth bread twice or more times I believe, and actually I'm not sure because I was switching IPs while I didn't know I was banned. Then accused of ban evasion many times, but I didn't know.
>The fact that we're even having this conversation is proof that they don't discipline people for simply shitposting, no matter how obnoxious it is
I was banned just for posting a meme in the Flat Earth bread twice or more times I believe, and actually I'm not sure because I was switching IPs while I didn't know I was banned. Then accused of ban evasion many times, but I didn't know.
>>8864
So in other words, these "mass bannings" you keep bringing up were just you, being banned under multiple IPs. Thus validating my statement.
So in other words, these "mass bannings" you keep bringing up were just you, being banned under multiple IPs. Thus validating my statement.
>>8868
>Padding my bread
And here he is, admitting to samefagging and astroturfing fake engagement, just like I accused him of only a few posts ago.
>Padding my bread
And here he is, admitting to samefagging and astroturfing fake engagement, just like I accused him of only a few posts ago.
>>8865
You knock it off.
Nobody wants your Facebook sewage in this board. Nobody uses "/s" on imageboards, especially not /pol/ where the ability to interpret irony is so expected for users.
Learn how to post on an imageboard. Lurk moar.
You knock it off.
Nobody wants your Facebook sewage in this board. Nobody uses "/s" on imageboards, especially not /pol/ where the ability to interpret irony is so expected for users.
Learn how to post on an imageboard. Lurk moar.
>>8872
You bump it with redundant images and low-rez jpegs that were already posted, or grainy image macros taken from Facebook in a sloppy attempt to bait posters into engaging you in arguments that were already had earlier in the thread.
That's spam. It's hardly different than a "/pol/ BTFO" thread.
You bump it with redundant images and low-rez jpegs that were already posted, or grainy image macros taken from Facebook in a sloppy attempt to bait posters into engaging you in arguments that were already had earlier in the thread.
That's spam. It's hardly different than a "/pol/ BTFO" thread.
>>8876
>image macros taken from Facebook
Oof, same lies again. Those memes would never ever be admitted in faceberg.
>image macros taken from Facebook
Oof, same lies again. Those memes would never ever be admitted in faceberg.
>>8870
Nigger, these are your exact words:
>So much quality that even when everypony was banned the best you faggots where posting was Hi Anon threads.
Let me call special attention to this part:
>everypony was banned
"Everypony" implies multiple people. You are trying to make it look like more than one person was banned, when in reality it was just you posting from different IPs.
>>8872
>I pad a bread, I keep it bumped and alive. I did nothing wrong.
You keep it "bumped and alive" by posting fake replies to make it look like there are other anons posting besides you. The only reason it required bumping in the first place is because no one else was interested in the content you were posting, thus nobody else was participating. And yes, you did do something wrong: you disingenuously posted fake replies to a bullshit thread to fake engagement in said thread.
[Read more] Nigger, these are your exact words:
>So much quality that even when everypony was banned the best you faggots where posting was Hi Anon threads.
Let me call special attention to this part:
>everypony was banned
"Everypony" implies multiple people. You are trying to make it look like more than one person was banned, when in reality it was just you posting from different IPs.
>>8872
>I pad a bread, I keep it bumped and alive. I did nothing wrong.
You keep it "bumped and alive" by posting fake replies to make it look like there are other anons posting besides you. The only reason it required bumping in the first place is because no one else was interested in the content you were posting, thus nobody else was participating. And yes, you did do something wrong: you disingenuously posted fake replies to a bullshit thread to fake engagement in said thread.
>>8879
>You keep it "bumped and alive" by posting fake replies to make it look like there are other anons posting besides you.
>fake replies
Nope, those are addendums to early posts. Please stop the slander.
>You keep it "bumped and alive" by posting fake replies to make it look like there are other anons posting besides you.
>fake replies
Nope, those are addendums to early posts. Please stop the slander.
>>8878
>my memes are so gay not even Faceberg will take them
>somehow this validates my point
The absolute state of this nigger.
>my memes are so gay not even Faceberg will take them
>somehow this validates my point
The absolute state of this nigger.
>>8878
When I reverse image search them, they show up on the flat earth Facebook page, full of memes of the same quality.
But do share, if not Facebook, where do you get your memes? What site are you getting these from?
When I reverse image search them, they show up on the flat earth Facebook page, full of memes of the same quality.
But do share, if not Facebook, where do you get your memes? What site are you getting these from?
>>8879
>"Everypony" implies multiple people. You are trying to make it look like more than one person was banned, when in reality it was just you posting from different IPs.
Suuuuure. /s
>"Everypony" implies multiple people. You are trying to make it look like more than one person was banned, when in reality it was just you posting from different IPs.
Suuuuure. /s
>>8881
>gets called out for obvious samefagging and astroturfing
>slander
The absolute state of this cum-guzzler.
>gets called out for obvious samefagging and astroturfing
>slander
The absolute state of this cum-guzzler.
>>8883
>When I reverse image search them, they show up on the flat earth Facebook page
>Flat Earth
Flat Earth might be in faceberg, but NOT the 1,000s anti-zog memes I posted in /sp/
>When I reverse image search them, they show up on the flat earth Facebook page
>Flat Earth
Flat Earth might be in faceberg, but NOT the 1,000s anti-zog memes I posted in /sp/
Behead the boomer
>>8884
>gets caught dead-to-rights in an obvious gaslighting attempt
>accuses others of gaslighting
The absolute state of this rump-ranger.
>gets caught dead-to-rights in an obvious gaslighting attempt
>accuses others of gaslighting
The absolute state of this rump-ranger.
>>8886
Half of them still showed up on reverse image search.
Also you still didn't answer the question.
Half of them still showed up on reverse image search.
Also you still didn't answer the question.
>>8891
>was completely, utterly and unequivocally btfo by multiple anons yet again
>makes pathetic attempt at damage control while backing out of the argument
>still thinks he has the high ground
The absolute state of this semen-sipper.
>was completely, utterly and unequivocally btfo by multiple anons yet again
>makes pathetic attempt at damage control while backing out of the argument
>still thinks he has the high ground
The absolute state of this semen-sipper.
>>8889
He doesn't even know what the word "gaslighting" means, even though it's been explained to him before.
He doesn't even know what the word "gaslighting" means, even though it's been explained to him before.
>>8836
Also so we need more posts and posting to hash this out completely.
First and foremost, staff intuition and post event user verification.
<Users should report posts that break the rules, bants come afterwards.
As in staff should just do it the community trusts you even when you worry about faggot stuff and do a dumb sometimes and wackey user side freak outs.
Users will post on /qa/ if you fuck up or other users fucked up. Maybe bants a bit, but it'll all be good.
And if it's not good users will shit on /qa/ in a thread and responsibly get shitfaced, shitpost and post horse pussy.
I'm being serious this is less of the old fags needed to purity spiral, because purity spirals are really super extra bad, but a tool to ensure the magical beginning stays that magical beginning.
Do not purity spiral.
I know old fags are shit heels and are annoying as fuck so are newfags and cancer-fags and /ptg/ fags, but it's the specifics in flavor and nuance.
>Oldfags want /mlpol/ to stay /mlpol/. The other fags don't.
With that quick rule of thumb out of the way.
Here's a supplemental list so you can tell the faggots why they're a faggot. Pick maybe a handful or all of them or one.
Listed in no particular order.
>Just Lurk More
Yes that is a solution, stop ass mashing the keyboard and go learn about the old guard. The history, the green texts, the shit posts. Learn some imageboard history in this a place.
Call it learning about history or something.
>Staff Custom order
That's right (You) make up some bullshit then post it some /qa/ thread or stick it on that post for shits and giggles. Hopefully they'll learn from it.
Just making fun shitposts legal.
Stick a rainbow flag or whatever other nonsense, we're all imageboard residents and you have to have a bit of fun.
>It Happened again
It happened again. And again and again ect.
>Communications go nowhere.
It's not that they don't talk. It's like talking to a brick wall that sometimes spits a shaken canned soda of shit.
>Superiority Complex
They're better than everybody. They're of higher value than everyone else.
>Anti-Discussion tactics
It's impossible to have a good-faith discussion.
>Puppeting for arguments agreement
They pretend to be somebody else to trick others and that pretend somebody who happens to agree with everything is not them. Usually done poorly and it's retarded.
This isn't mocking or pretending for the purpose of discussion, most of all nobody is tricked or is tricking. It's a retorical technique.
>Paranoia speak
Such as the staff is a shill, that point is kike centric or it was horse cock legend. Ect. On a personal note sorry about that.
>Babble-bullshit
It's more than nonsense it's going the extra mile.
>Slog
It has little redeeming properties, it's not fun, it's not insightful, it's not new, it's not an update, it's not knowledge, it's not shitposting, it's not bettering anybody in any way, it's not even trying.
>Speaking from ignorance
The faggot just spews ignorance like a niggah moment.
>Doubling down to the nth power.
Happens again and again and again. It's just retarded enough like a paki throwing away drugs and expecting the officer to also forget about it once it's out of sight. Or that it was just a moment ago.
>Dissociation
It wasn't them after all continuity of consciousness doesn't exist for them.
>Tactical slipperiness
Like slime if you grab it too hard.
>Legalese Salad
You know for violating race mixing rule because of a pony and human. It's bullshit and nonsense.
>Total Rejecting /MLPOL/ etiquette. No attempt to learn or retain it.
It's that self-behavior modification didn't or doesn't work or happen.
<What is horse-whispering forum etiquette that matters for community and site health.
[Read more] Also so we need more posts and posting to hash this out completely.
First and foremost, staff intuition and post event user verification.
<Users should report posts that break the rules, bants come afterwards.
As in staff should just do it the community trusts you even when you worry about faggot stuff and do a dumb sometimes and wackey user side freak outs.
Users will post on /qa/ if you fuck up or other users fucked up. Maybe bants a bit, but it'll all be good.
And if it's not good users will shit on /qa/ in a thread and responsibly get shitfaced, shitpost and post horse pussy.
I'm being serious this is less of the old fags needed to purity spiral, because purity spirals are really super extra bad, but a tool to ensure the magical beginning stays that magical beginning.
Do not purity spiral.
I know old fags are shit heels and are annoying as fuck so are newfags and cancer-fags and /ptg/ fags, but it's the specifics in flavor and nuance.
>Oldfags want /mlpol/ to stay /mlpol/. The other fags don't.
With that quick rule of thumb out of the way.
Here's a supplemental list so you can tell the faggots why they're a faggot. Pick maybe a handful or all of them or one.
Listed in no particular order.
>Just Lurk More
Yes that is a solution, stop ass mashing the keyboard and go learn about the old guard. The history, the green texts, the shit posts. Learn some imageboard history in this a place.
Call it learning about history or something.
>Staff Custom order
That's right (You) make up some bullshit then post it some /qa/ thread or stick it on that post for shits and giggles. Hopefully they'll learn from it.
Just making fun shitposts legal.
Stick a rainbow flag or whatever other nonsense, we're all imageboard residents and you have to have a bit of fun.
>It Happened again
It happened again. And again and again ect.
>Communications go nowhere.
It's not that they don't talk. It's like talking to a brick wall that sometimes spits a shaken canned soda of shit.
>Superiority Complex
They're better than everybody. They're of higher value than everyone else.
>Anti-Discussion tactics
It's impossible to have a good-faith discussion.
>Puppeting for arguments agreement
They pretend to be somebody else to trick others and that pretend somebody who happens to agree with everything is not them. Usually done poorly and it's retarded.
This isn't mocking or pretending for the purpose of discussion, most of all nobody is tricked or is tricking. It's a retorical technique.
>Paranoia speak
Such as the staff is a shill, that point is kike centric or it was horse cock legend. Ect. On a personal note sorry about that.
>Babble-bullshit
It's more than nonsense it's going the extra mile.
>Slog
It has little redeeming properties, it's not fun, it's not insightful, it's not new, it's not an update, it's not knowledge, it's not shitposting, it's not bettering anybody in any way, it's not even trying.
>Speaking from ignorance
The faggot just spews ignorance like a niggah moment.
>Doubling down to the nth power.
Happens again and again and again. It's just retarded enough like a paki throwing away drugs and expecting the officer to also forget about it once it's out of sight. Or that it was just a moment ago.
>Dissociation
It wasn't them after all continuity of consciousness doesn't exist for them.
>Tactical slipperiness
Like slime if you grab it too hard.
>Legalese Salad
You know for violating race mixing rule because of a pony and human. It's bullshit and nonsense.
>Total Rejecting /MLPOL/ etiquette. No attempt to learn or retain it.
It's that self-behavior modification didn't or doesn't work or happen.
<What is horse-whispering forum etiquette that matters for community and site health.
1712635909.jpg (1.7 MB, 1309x2581, dgxamnl-fd0b3f6c-b59b-43a2-b684-bad8a926001b.jpg)
>>8843
>Because not every onboxious faggot poster is one that you are thinking of right now
And who are those other obnoxious faggots?
>>8824
>To me, the most common attribute of excessive faggotry is making everything personal. Too many first-person pronouns in their posts, and too many personal attacks of other posters.
So, I dunno if I understood this correctly. But if you mean to say that shit flinging should become a bannable offense. It should first make it to the rules. In fact, it should be put under the same scrutiny as anything on this thread. Poners can be confident the staff will handle this with the same caution it has handled this thread thus far.
>Because not every onboxious faggot poster is one that you are thinking of right now
And who are those other obnoxious faggots?
>>8824
>To me, the most common attribute of excessive faggotry is making everything personal. Too many first-person pronouns in their posts, and too many personal attacks of other posters.
So, I dunno if I understood this correctly. But if you mean to say that shit flinging should become a bannable offense. It should first make it to the rules. In fact, it should be put under the same scrutiny as anything on this thread. Poners can be confident the staff will handle this with the same caution it has handled this thread thus far.
1712644620_2.jpg (91.7 KB, 1380x1040, 0263B7E1110085CA067D2098BE49068A-93854.jpg)
1712644620_3.png (2.8 MB, 1620x1746, FA24746D1F74F68ABFA02E29300DD60C-2979549.png)
1712644620_4.png (510.5 KB, 1062x1096, 051BB61FBD5F224E4D35C5787B596EFD-522757.png)
Fuck I actually have to address this here or it won't be documented.
>>8824
Lotus you cook a good steamed ham. But you're saying the immune system sucks because everything gets red and puffy and full of weird fluids.
It's a sign of a reaction to an illness the immune system uses all the time and it goes away once there's nothing wrong.
You're looking at the symptom rather than the root cause according to what you've typed.
As such I vehemently disagree. You could do what you've suggested. You'll find ailments has gone terminal.
It takes it's toll on the body and it takes time to recover.
>I'm not a fan of these rules.
I know. I'm sad that is the case.
I understand you desire maximum freedom of speech and I thought that too. Because everyone could talk it out even if we don't agree we're all here in this together.
The problem is not everyone is in this together.
For Anonymous users in the trenches it's grating like sand paper. Wiping your hand across it once is fine, doing so repeated gets down to the bone.
That's why I'm suggesting a rule, because the default shitposting immune system found something new, so we need staff.
If you want to try going about it as a user feel free, but if you don't understand I have to insist you give it shot so you have this complete experience.
It hurts, I am sorry for that.
And I am sorry I didn't get around to this sort of thing sooner, but I didn't get it fully yet then. It might take years, it did for me.
I hope you understand where I'm coming from.
On alighter condensed note I suppose I am telling you to stick your hand into a hurt-box so the visceral wearing down can be used to safe guard the future.
<It's way different from gripping sharp spiky metal balls which is what users of /mlpol/ or the old times tend to be.
Yes (You) all have balls of steel.
Quickly piercing down to the bone marrow so the ball is released which is full of pony and a toxic concoction of autism, shitposting, friendship and more pony.
And sometimes going all the way through out the other side.
By design this ends most faggotry staff doesn't want or need to touch.
The optimal hurt-box minimizing suffering for maximum cultural and psychological conversion or leakage from the experience.
[Read more] >>8824
Lotus you cook a good steamed ham. But you're saying the immune system sucks because everything gets red and puffy and full of weird fluids.
It's a sign of a reaction to an illness the immune system uses all the time and it goes away once there's nothing wrong.
You're looking at the symptom rather than the root cause according to what you've typed.
As such I vehemently disagree. You could do what you've suggested. You'll find ailments has gone terminal.
It takes it's toll on the body and it takes time to recover.
>I'm not a fan of these rules.
I know. I'm sad that is the case.
I understand you desire maximum freedom of speech and I thought that too. Because everyone could talk it out even if we don't agree we're all here in this together.
The problem is not everyone is in this together.
For Anonymous users in the trenches it's grating like sand paper. Wiping your hand across it once is fine, doing so repeated gets down to the bone.
That's why I'm suggesting a rule, because the default shitposting immune system found something new, so we need staff.
If you want to try going about it as a user feel free, but if you don't understand I have to insist you give it shot so you have this complete experience.
It hurts, I am sorry for that.
And I am sorry I didn't get around to this sort of thing sooner, but I didn't get it fully yet then. It might take years, it did for me.
I hope you understand where I'm coming from.
On a
<It's way different from gripping sharp spiky metal balls which is what users of /mlpol/ or the old times tend to be.
Yes (You) all have balls of steel.
Quickly piercing down to the bone marrow so the ball is released which is full of pony and a toxic concoction of autism, shitposting, friendship and more pony.
And sometimes going all the way through out the other side.
By design this ends most faggotry staff doesn't want or need to touch.
The optimal hurt-box minimizing suffering for maximum cultural and psychological conversion or leakage from the experience.
>>8895
This sounds to me like a commie rationalization of your basic intention: banish that anon because he will not fold to our wishes. Kinda a mutation of the liberal hivemind.
>>8897
And this is a naked attempt to use law enforcement to do the dirty work for ya. What about if you mind your business and leave the rest alone?
This sounds to me like a commie rationalization of your basic intention: banish that anon because he will not fold to our wishes. Kinda a mutation of the liberal hivemind.
>>8897
And this is a naked attempt to use law enforcement to do the dirty work for ya. What about if you mind your business and leave the rest alone?
>>8896
>>8897
For those of you who still don't get it. Lotus is referencing a small group of posters who wanted certain undesirables banned. And whom more often than not, got into arguments with him and other staff members in some cases. You can say they aren't very polite.
>>8824
>>8843
Welp, I was gonna wait and see if you're willing to swallow your pride for the site's sake. But I've known the answer for years now.
Tho you hate "self-aggrandizing" posts. It's hard not to bake them when I'm better than you.
For what it's worth. I'm sorry for having antagonized you like that. I'm sorry for going all out in such a personal level. And I'm sorry for being such a shit throwing monkey. I said somethings about this site's users, and about you, that I shouldn't have said. And it was with the only goal of making you and the others feels batman.
So, am sorry fella. I don't deserve to be welcomed back with open arms like nothing happened. I chose to abandon this place then and there, when I started attacking you and the others. And you were justified to have banned me.
I can't speak for niggas and the others. But I atleast won't get in the way any longer. Do whatever you want. I hope you can make the right choice.
Some of my posts >>>/sp/22015 → >>>/sp/22372 → Btw, I know this is all contradictory to what I've told you in the other thread, Sven. But this is called making a compromise and putting your pride aside and it isn't done very often.
[Read more] >>8897
For those of you who still don't get it. Lotus is referencing a small group of posters who wanted certain undesirables banned. And whom more often than not, got into arguments with him and other staff members in some cases. You can say they aren't very polite.
>>8824
>>8843
Welp, I was gonna wait and see if you're willing to swallow your pride for the site's sake. But I've known the answer for years now.
Tho you hate "self-aggrandizing" posts. It's hard not to bake them when I'm better than you.
For what it's worth. I'm sorry for having antagonized you like that. I'm sorry for going all out in such a personal level. And I'm sorry for being such a shit throwing monkey. I said somethings about this site's users, and about you, that I shouldn't have said. And it was with the only goal of making you and the others feels batman.
So, am sorry fella. I don't deserve to be welcomed back with open arms like nothing happened. I chose to abandon this place then and there, when I started attacking you and the others. And you were justified to have banned me.
I can't speak for niggas and the others. But I atleast won't get in the way any longer. Do whatever you want. I hope you can make the right choice.
Some of my posts >>>/sp/22015 → >>>/sp/22372 → Btw, I know this is all contradictory to what I've told you in the other thread, Sven. But this is called making a compromise and putting your pride aside and it isn't done very often.
>>8899
>Then why don't you actually leave?
I will. I haven't even posted for a very long time. Only came back to shi...I mean, tell Sven something I wanted to tell him for a long time.
>Then why don't you actually leave?
I will. I haven't even posted for a very long time. Only came back to shi...I mean, tell Sven something I wanted to tell him for a long time.
1712652187.jpg (18.9 KB, 422x504, 17648aae6f0dfad18c579553cfd69215.jpg)
>>8896
>And who are those other obnoxious faggots?
I think a short answer of "what posters come to mind for excessive faggotry?" is that every one of them has been ad hoc banned at least once
>>8896
>So, I dunno if I understood this correctly. But if you mean to say that shit flinging should become a bannable offense. It should first make it to the rules. In fact, it should be put under the same scrutiny as anything on this thread. Poners can be confident the staff will handle this with the same caution it has handled this thread thus far.
More or less. I think there's more to it than just "shit flinging," but there's definitely a point at which ad hominin attacks just suffocate discussion.
>You're looking at the symptom rather than the root cause according to what you've typed.
As such I vehemently disagree. You could do what you've suggested. You'll find ailments has gone terminal.
I think you're saying "If you know it's problem, just fucking do it," correct?
>>8899
pets ze anon
[Read more] >And who are those other obnoxious faggots?
I think a short answer of "what posters come to mind for excessive faggotry?" is that every one of them has been ad hoc banned at least once
>>8896
>So, I dunno if I understood this correctly. But if you mean to say that shit flinging should become a bannable offense. It should first make it to the rules. In fact, it should be put under the same scrutiny as anything on this thread. Poners can be confident the staff will handle this with the same caution it has handled this thread thus far.
More or less. I think there's more to it than just "shit flinging," but there's definitely a point at which ad hominin attacks just suffocate discussion.
>You're looking at the symptom rather than the root cause according to what you've typed.
As such I vehemently disagree. You could do what you've suggested. You'll find ailments has gone terminal.
I think you're saying "If you know it's problem, just fucking do it," correct?
>>8899
pets ze anon
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-177] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
177 replies | 97 files | 18 UUIDs | Page 3
[Add to Thread Watcher]