/vx/ has been one of more freuently used boards for along time now. The board throws a wide net, attmpting to formally encompass the topics of /v/ and /x/, and informally encompass the concepts and topics of /tg/, /qst/, and arguably /vint/. While the board has seen lots of use in its days, its wide range of topics might also be to its detriment.
For starters, the concept of /vx/ began a continuation of the theme of the April 2017 prank of combined boards being ironically better than their respective parent boards. /vx/ was proposed in response to demand for players who wanted a place to discuss video games and other players who wanted a place to talk about supernatual things, as a means of giving a space for both. The thing is, while ll of the other boards were based on wordplays or jokes on behalf of the 4cuck staff, /vx/ was just kind of based on wanting to fill two niches with just one board. That was fine, as the /v/ and the /x/ posters didn't really get in eachothers way or argue, but they also didn't really interact in any notable way even f they did overlap. Many of th posters appear to stick to their handful of generals. There haven't been any memes that have emerged based on th concept of the usion of /v/ and /x/, or even /tg/ and /x/, as it appears that the concept of mixing fantasy game magic with actual magic isn't as adhesive as originally intended.
Shortly after it was created, /vx/ was coneptually expanded to include all gaming discussion, including /tg/ discussion and /qst/ style pbp roleplay threads. Those are certainly topics that this site benefits from, as all pony altchans have roleplay boards, and roleplay is banned on /mlp/ while ponies are banned everywhere else on 4chan. The roleplay threads take up the overwhelming majority of the boards posts per day, with discarded threads taking the lion's share of the board's catalog. You could even say traditional games and roleplay is the unofficial main topic of /vx/, despite it not being represented in the board's name. /vx/ certainly has a great volume rp posts, but general roleplay discussion has suffered, in part due to being suffocated by the board's other topics: it doesn't help ease of casual rp discussion when you have to first specify that you're talking about fantasy magic over actual magic, and roleplaying games instead of video games. The threads on the board that are aimed towards /tg/-style discussion don't get very many replies. The flags and IDs don't really contribute to those aspects either.
That aside, roleplay definitely has the potential to be a big thing on this site, and I'm certain that we could do better. All the other pony altchans have prolific roleplay boards, and I'm certain /pol/acks have their on unique roleplay ideas too.
Meta-wise, /vx/ is formally-blue (now red) board where posts have both flags and image IDs, similar to /mlpol/. That coflicts with the concept though, because neither /v/ nor /x/ had those components, neither are they necessary for discussion on either board.
Obviously, the inclusion of flags is a nod to /vint/, our sister board. /vint/ was one of the other April 1st 2017 board that everyone liked, being another board that several Anons demanded to have reinstated on 4chins to no avail. "She" was featured in the /mlpol/-tan comic that many of us bonded over in the /qa/ wars as they spilled into [s4s], having met /mlpol/-tan in the darkness of the deleted zone where they encountered the ravenous /z/. The flags were added to sate Anons who wanted to bring /vint/ back, although the board hasn't really satisfied the feel or appearance of the old /vint/, especially since neither /vint/ nor any of the boards it was effectively combined with featured image IDs.
Now, don't get me wrong, /vx/ is my secon favorite board after /mlpol/. I just really think this site could do
>"So what do you propose, faggot?"
I propose that /vx/, with due anticipation and announcement, should be archived in place of other board(s) that better accomodate its many topics. The boards would be separate and based on ideas that mesh together or have cultural sigificance, such as:
>/vint/ ("international vidya"): our sister board which was in high demand for ressurrecion. It already has its wn memes, and even a cute board-tan. Bringing /vint/ back would satisfy the needfor a place to discuss video games (and random pajeeting), while reaffirming this site's committment to 2017 nostalgia. The board should feature flags, but not poster IDs, in spirit of our sister board.
>/kx/ (maybe "weaponized autism"): A dangerously-based idea that was proposed as an alternative to /vx/ as early as 2017. /kx/ would be a radical and mystic hive of schizoposting, and an original hybrid board that 4chins jannies weren't brave enough to create. It would satisfy the want for /x/-tier supernatural discussion and conspiracy theories, while also providing space for this board's currently-untapped potential for gunposting and prepping. The /x/ side of /vx/ wouldn't really suffer at all from being divorced from the /tg/ and /v/ elements, and the big-schizo energy from the /k/ element of the board could serve as a huge bullet-shaped viagra to supercharge the board's discussion and create its own culture. /kx/ would have neither post IDs nor flags, as anonyity is important to it.
>/hp/ (maybe "Horseplay"?): A roleplay board that the bathhouse threads could migrate to and make their own without smothering video games discussion. A roleplay board serves to benefit a community such as ours as it facilitates creation if OCs and other content, which is why other pony altchans give them their own boards. It could also be the place for /tg/ disussion, or CYOAs. /hp/ would have neither flags nor post IDs, as none of its elements (/mlp/, /tg/, or /qst/) have them.
These are ideas I've considered for a while. I wouldn't expect them to be implemented immeditely, but perhaps you guys might take some time to warm up to the idea for the future?
Thoughts?
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
339 replies | 55 files | 118 UUIDs | Page 1
1643832512.jpg (87.4 KB, 833x821, 5E9BD9CEA1EFEE0A27A4B3968B213F17-200101.jpg)
Now, I know that the idea of splitting up a board has potentia to cause disturbance, so I've considered how people would respond to this:
>/vx/ is fine how it is. There's no need to change it.
Is it though? Aside from the few general at the top of the catalog, most of the threads are pretty much dead. I think this site and this community has potential to do a lot better after observing it for almost 5 years. We are /mlpol/: we're supposed to be the best.
>I post to /vx/ all of the time, and I raher like my threads. I wouldn't want to have to change it.
So do I, and this move wouldn't and shouldn't necessitate posters giving up anything they currently have. Posters who frequent threads or generals in the old board could easily continue or remake those threads on the new boards, with greater specificity and content.
>having so many relatively-slow threads would be ugly
Look at /vx/. Skip through the pages and look at the threads. Most of the threads haven't had any posts made to them in years before they were necrobumped a few years ago. In comparison, a few extra chracters at the top of the screen would be nothing.
>I we split it into multiple boards, they'd all just be even deader.
Quite the opposite, actually. /vx/ is a fusion of multiple concepts; while that promotes content if the topics have synergy, it does the opposite if they do not. Giving each of the topics their space to breath could actually promote content in them.
Furthermore, these boards all include one or more of /vx/'s most active components, and they would continue to be active on their respective boards filling up the catalog: the roleplayers would continue to roleplay, the vidyaposters would continue to discuss vidya, and the /x/posters would continue to talk about metaphysics and argue about nonsense. The boards would be filled even more by their hybrid aspects: gunposting on /kx/ has potential to be very prolific on a /pol/-offshoot community in addition to generating its own dangerously-based memes, /vint/ would be fueled by 2017 nostalgia as well as the sheer scale of vidya discourse potential when not suffocated by other topics, /hp/ (or whatever else you want to call it) could become a place for CYOAs OC creation, and the kind of casual greentext that 4cuck jannies hte for some reason.
>this is just a /v/-tiet balkanization
This is nothing of the sort. The respetive topics had nothing to do with one another and very little conceptual synergy. Splitting them up from one another, and pairing them with more appropriate hybrid elements doesn't split u their own respective topics.
>We don't need more boards
The only really new element of this would be the /k/ element, and I know it has plenty of potential in this community. Otherwise, it's just giving due space to concepts
>It's already been like this for 4 years. Why change it?
I wasn't sure about /vx/ as a concept 4 years ago, and I'm certain we could do better now. I was prolific poster on /vx/ for years and I think I have a decent understanding of what elements of it are good and which ones have quite frankly been insubstantial. Just count all of the dead threads and failed conversations. We can do better than this.
>/vx/ is irrelevant to the main topics of /mlpol/, and thus its quality is low priority
This is a misconception. All of the topics currently smushed together on /vx/ can in some way or form be related to the topic of ponies or politics. Furthermore, these topics are hobbies that encourage user engagement and site participation: users shouldn't feel like they need to go to other chans to get a quality experience for those topics, so it is in the interest of th community to encourage discusson thereof.
>/mlpol/ is too small to sustain quality discussion of these topics, so why even bother?
This is an overstated and rather nihilist attitude that unortunately discorages some users here. If you compare /mlpol/ to a lot of other chans of simila kinds, we actually have quit a high post per day count. Similar alt chans of similar or smaller size are able to sustain boards like this with daily posts, so we certainly could too.
>we've already made too many new boards, and the last two we made are basiclly dead already. This well just be the same.
Quite frankly, I think /cyb/ and /ub/ suffer similar issues in being oo broad and unspecific of topics, but /vx/ is different because it possesses at least three already-present elements that are prolific enough o fill up catalogs on their own.
>If these boards are a success, they'd just attact newags and discord trannies
That's the same logic as saying that /vx/ itself would be bad for the site if it were good. Having good content that attracts users isn't always a bad thing. Besides, we still have our pornshield among other perks of this site that scare aay hostile invasion.
>You're a shill trying to damage our community!
I wouldn't have spent all this time typing if I didn't actully care about /mlpo/ and even /vx/. I just want our site to do better.
>That's such a big idea. I'm not sure if I'm comfortable with it...
It would be a big step, yes, but we coud take it slowly. We could take months planning it. Each board could even have its own conceptual thread on /qa/ as its planned.
>This is just more work for the Devteam who are already overburdened.
Making boards isn't as hard as it sounds. Any admin can do it.
>All these ideas suck
I cant say they're perfect, but we could talk about them to improve them to work them out.
>I am a user of /vx/ and am a fan of memes and threads that are uique the the board and wouldn't fit on any of these new ones.
I quite frankly don't know of any unique /vx/ memes, but if you're a fan of content unique to the concept of /vx/, please speak up! It's important to preserve any culture that this community has developed over the years.
>/vx/ is fine how it is. There's no need to change it.
Is it though? Aside from the few general at the top of the catalog, most of the threads are pretty much dead. I think this site and this community has potential to do a lot better after observing it for almost 5 years. We are /mlpol/: we're supposed to be the best.
>I post to /vx/ all of the time, and I raher like my threads. I wouldn't want to have to change it.
So do I, and this move wouldn't and shouldn't necessitate posters giving up anything they currently have. Posters who frequent threads or generals in the old board could easily continue or remake those threads on the new boards, with greater specificity and content.
>having so many relatively-slow threads would be ugly
Look at /vx/. Skip through the pages and look at the threads. Most of the threads haven't had any posts made to them in years before they were necrobumped a few years ago. In comparison, a few extra chracters at the top of the screen would be nothing.
>I we split it into multiple boards, they'd all just be even deader.
Quite the opposite, actually. /vx/ is a fusion of multiple concepts; while that promotes content if the topics have synergy, it does the opposite if they do not. Giving each of the topics their space to breath could actually promote content in them.
Furthermore, these boards all include one or more of /vx/'s most active components, and they would continue to be active on their respective boards filling up the catalog: the roleplayers would continue to roleplay, the vidyaposters would continue to discuss vidya, and the /x/posters would continue to talk about metaphysics and argue about nonsense. The boards would be filled even more by their hybrid aspects: gunposting on /kx/ has potential to be very prolific on a /pol/-offshoot community in addition to generating its own dangerously-based memes, /vint/ would be fueled by 2017 nostalgia as well as the sheer scale of vidya discourse potential when not suffocated by other topics, /hp/ (or whatever else you want to call it) could become a place for CYOAs OC creation, and the kind of casual greentext that 4cuck jannies hte for some reason.
>this is just a /v/-tiet balkanization
This is nothing of the sort. The respetive topics had nothing to do with one another and very little conceptual synergy. Splitting them up from one another, and pairing them with more appropriate hybrid elements doesn't split u their own respective topics.
>We don't need more boards
The only really new element of this would be the /k/ element, and I know it has plenty of potential in this community. Otherwise, it's just giving due space to concepts
>It's already been like this for 4 years. Why change it?
I wasn't sure about /vx/ as a concept 4 years ago, and I'm certain we could do better now. I was prolific poster on /vx/ for years and I think I have a decent understanding of what elements of it are good and which ones have quite frankly been insubstantial. Just count all of the dead threads and failed conversations. We can do better than this.
>/vx/ is irrelevant to the main topics of /mlpol/, and thus its quality is low priority
This is a misconception. All of the topics currently smushed together on /vx/ can in some way or form be related to the topic of ponies or politics. Furthermore, these topics are hobbies that encourage user engagement and site participation: users shouldn't feel like they need to go to other chans to get a quality experience for those topics, so it is in the interest of th community to encourage discusson thereof.
>/mlpol/ is too small to sustain quality discussion of these topics, so why even bother?
This is an overstated and rather nihilist attitude that unortunately discorages some users here. If you compare /mlpol/ to a lot of other chans of simila kinds, we actually have quit a high post per day count. Similar alt chans of similar or smaller size are able to sustain boards like this with daily posts, so we certainly could too.
>we've already made too many new boards, and the last two we made are basiclly dead already. This well just be the same.
Quite frankly, I think /cyb/ and /ub/ suffer similar issues in being oo broad and unspecific of topics, but /vx/ is different because it possesses at least three already-present elements that are prolific enough o fill up catalogs on their own.
>If these boards are a success, they'd just attact newags and discord trannies
That's the same logic as saying that /vx/ itself would be bad for the site if it were good. Having good content that attracts users isn't always a bad thing. Besides, we still have our pornshield among other perks of this site that scare aay hostile invasion.
>You're a shill trying to damage our community!
I wouldn't have spent all this time typing if I didn't actully care about /mlpo/ and even /vx/. I just want our site to do better.
>That's such a big idea. I'm not sure if I'm comfortable with it...
It would be a big step, yes, but we coud take it slowly. We could take months planning it. Each board could even have its own conceptual thread on /qa/ as its planned.
>This is just more work for the Devteam who are already overburdened.
Making boards isn't as hard as it sounds. Any admin can do it.
>All these ideas suck
I cant say they're perfect, but we could talk about them to improve them to work them out.
>I am a user of /vx/ and am a fan of memes and threads that are uique the the board and wouldn't fit on any of these new ones.
I quite frankly don't know of any unique /vx/ memes, but if you're a fan of content unique to the concept of /vx/, please speak up! It's important to preserve any culture that this community has developed over the years.
>>6596
I addressed both of those points in post 2.
Traffick would improve if it were re-made, or stay the same at worst.
And in many ways, it is broken. It's been broken for years, but since it was low traffick nobody cared enough to fix it.
And despite what it looks like, our traffick is actually pretty high for an altchan. We could definitely pull this off.
>>6597
Also considered that. It's not nearly as as difficult to add a board to this site as you may think. Anyone with admin privileges can do it, and it can be done in a short amount of time.
I made this thread now so that we could discuss it and devs would have time to implement it, although I guess it should have been made years ago.
I addressed both of those points in post 2.
Traffick would improve if it were re-made, or stay the same at worst.
And in many ways, it is broken. It's been broken for years, but since it was low traffick nobody cared enough to fix it.
And despite what it looks like, our traffick is actually pretty high for an altchan. We could definitely pull this off.
>>6597
Also considered that. It's not nearly as as difficult to add a board to this site as you may think. Anyone with admin privileges can do it, and it can be done in a short amount of time.
I made this thread now so that we could discuss it and devs would have time to implement it, although I guess it should have been made years ago.
Anonymous
No.6599
>>6598
>It's not nearly as as difficult to add a board to this site as you may think
I guess it's up to staff then, i don't have hard opinions on the matter besides that
>It's not nearly as as difficult to add a board to this site as you may think
I guess it's up to staff then, i don't have hard opinions on the matter besides that
>>6594
>And yet, i distrust change.
Yeah, so do I, which is why I waited so long to propose it even though I really had the idea for basically exactly this three years ago.
Still, after considering what seems like every potential implication, i think the idea is worth doing.
>And yet, i distrust change.
Yeah, so do I, which is why I waited so long to propose it even though I really had the idea for basically exactly this three years ago.
Still, after considering what seems like every potential implication, i think the idea is worth doing.
>>6600
>which is why I waited so long to propose it even though
This has been proposed many times already, I suspect by the same fag.
>Still, after considering what seems like every potential implication, i think the idea is worth doing.
I do too. And the prospect is negative. No change is needed.
>which is why I waited so long to propose it even though
This has been proposed many times already, I suspect by the same fag.
>Still, after considering what seems like every potential implication, i think the idea is worth doing.
I do too. And the prospect is negative. No change is needed.
Anonymous
No.6602
>>6601
>prospect is negative
Elaborate.
>No change is needed.
I strongly disagree. /mlpol/ can do much better than this.
>prospect is negative
Elaborate.
>No change is needed.
I strongly disagree. /mlpol/ can do much better than this.
Anonymous
No.6604
Anonymous
No.6605
>>6601
>And the prospect is negative.
I'm really interested in this. Is there anything wrong with this that I didn't consider in the #2 post?
>And the prospect is negative.
I'm really interested in this. Is there anything wrong with this that I didn't consider in the #2 post?
>>6606
If you have any objections, please feel free to explain.
>>6607
I think so too. A very good thing if done well.
>>6608
I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any detrimental consequences for this move. If you found a potential bad consequence that I didn't address in the post above, please speak up about your concerns.
I'd also like to point out that archiving /vx/ could make the move completely reversible if we don't like how it plays out.
If you have any objections, please feel free to explain.
>>6607
I think so too. A very good thing if done well.
>>6608
I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any detrimental consequences for this move. If you found a potential bad consequence that I didn't address in the post above, please speak up about your concerns.
I'd also like to point out that archiving /vx/ could make the move completely reversible if we don't like how it plays out.
>>6609
>I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any detrimental consequences for this move.
I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any benefit for that move. Add to that the potential disruptions that will cause and disgruntled poners.
/mlpol/ is fine as it is. Just saying.
>I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any detrimental consequences for this move.
I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any benefit for that move. Add to that the potential disruptions that will cause and disgruntled poners.
/mlpol/ is fine as it is. Just saying.
>>6612
>I haven't found any benefit for that move.
I just laid out all of the benefits. I actually had a few more, but I ran out of room, so I'll post more about that later.
>Add to that the potential disruptions that will cause and disgruntled poners.
I considered this in the post above. It would be a simple step for posters to continue their postings on the new boards with virtually no disruption, especially if the change were implemented with due warning and anticipation with the old board archived so that Anons could reference it whenever. Nobody should be excessively inconvenienced by the move.
>/mlpol/ is fine as it is.
/mlpol/ is great. The elements behind /vx/ could be greater.
>I haven't found any benefit for that move.
I just laid out all of the benefits. I actually had a few more, but I ran out of room, so I'll post more about that later.
>Add to that the potential disruptions that will cause and disgruntled poners.
I considered this in the post above. It would be a simple step for posters to continue their postings on the new boards with virtually no disruption, especially if the change were implemented with due warning and anticipation with the old board archived so that Anons could reference it whenever. Nobody should be excessively inconvenienced by the move.
>/mlpol/ is fine as it is.
/mlpol/ is great. The elements behind /vx/ could be greater.
>>6613
>/mlpol/ is great. The elements behind /vx/ could be greater.
Tampering the boards is bad idea.
>/mlpol/ is great. The elements behind /vx/ could be greater.
Tampering the boards is bad idea.
Anonymous
No.6619
Anonymous
No.6621
>8 UUIDs
I shouldn't have disabled post IDs on this thread. Idk what I was thinking...
I shouldn't have disabled post IDs on this thread. Idk what I was thinking...
Anonymous
No.6622
Should I make a new thread?
Anonymous
No.6666
Bring back /vint/.
Anonymous
No.7098
>>7096
I'm glad somebody agrees.
Not just for ttrpgs and games, but also just casual roleplay and roleplay threads. I think it's an untapped niche that we as a site could capitalize, especially since roleplay is banned on /mlp/.
I'm glad somebody agrees.
Not just for ttrpgs and games, but also just casual roleplay and roleplay threads. I think it's an untapped niche that we as a site could capitalize, especially since roleplay is banned on /mlp/.
Anonymous
No.7100
>>7099
OP here, no, that was another guy's idea. I have no real opinion on the other thing.
Also, I made this thread months ago.
OP here, no, that was another guy's idea. I have no real opinion on the other thing.
Also, I made this thread months ago.
why though? I have to browse /overboard/ to see more than 10 threads a day updated across the whole site, let alone /vx/
>>7101
Well, that's kind of the point. The current state of /vx/ doesn't encourage content creation or discussion on any of the 4-6 topics it covers, and those topics don't really mix together or complement well either.
Well, that's kind of the point. The current state of /vx/ doesn't encourage content creation or discussion on any of the 4-6 topics it covers, and those topics don't really mix together or complement well either.
Anonymous
No.7104
>>7103
>Autists don't need any of that.
That argument would be a lot more compelling if those topics actually got sufficient traffic on /vx/. I know that it's not from lack of interest.
>Autists don't need any of that.
That argument would be a lot more compelling if those topics actually got sufficient traffic on /vx/. I know that it's not from lack of interest.
Anonymous
No.7105
>>7101
The point is for the topics on /vx/ to actually get traffic and generate content.
Also I think /kx/ would be a good addition to the board.
The point is for the topics on /vx/ to actually get traffic and generate content.
Also I think /kx/ would be a good addition to the board.
Anonymous
No.7244
>>7243
I want a /k/ board too. I know for certain it would immediately be filled-up with content.
I like /kx/, because the idea of weaponizing schizos has so much meme potential.
I want a /k/ board too. I know for certain it would immediately be filled-up with content.
I like /kx/, because the idea of weaponizing schizos has so much meme potential.
Anonymous
No.7248
>>7243
It's a wasted opportunity that we're a right-wing pony chan and don't have a dedicated place for gun posting.
It's a wasted opportunity that we're a right-wing pony chan and don't have a dedicated place for gun posting.
Anonymous
No.7345
>>7103
>Autists don't need any of that.
Why? What's the purpose of this whole site if not to encourage autists to have fun?
>Autists don't need any of that.
Why? What's the purpose of this whole site if not to encourage autists to have fun?
Anonymous
No.7347
>ywn 3D Print pony guns unless pony /k/ becomes a thing
I also support the creation of a /k/ board, fellow domestic terrorists horsefuckers.
In fact, it would be so based if we had a thread where we could post pictures of our guns and the insides of our domiciles to pwn the libs. Bonus points if we combine it with an /o/ board. We could call it /ok/ and post pictures of our vehicles and weapons outside of our domiciles as well as discuss public meetups. That would be so based and marepilled, fellow Nazi horsefuckers. What could possibly go wrong?
In fact, it would be so based if we had a thread where we could post pictures of our guns and the insides of our domiciles to pwn the libs. Bonus points if we combine it with an /o/ board. We could call it /ok/ and post pictures of our vehicles and weapons outside of our domiciles as well as discuss public meetups. That would be so based and marepilled, fellow Nazi horsefuckers. What could possibly go wrong?
>>7349
I'm in more of the camp of making a /kx/, because combining gunposters and schizos makes for a dangerously based combo. It would also be a good way to cultivate a doomsday prepper community. I think /x/ would go better with /k/ them being smushed with fiction and fantasy games as it currently is with /vx/.
There's another thread about a potential /k/ board.
I'm in more of the camp of making a /kx/, because combining gunposters and schizos makes for a dangerously based combo. It would also be a good way to cultivate a doomsday prepper community. I think /x/ would go better with /k/ them being smushed with fiction and fantasy games as it currently is with /vx/.
There's another thread about a potential /k/ board.
>>7349
Public meetups are retarded, posting vehicles is retarded. Posting gun and gun info is better.
Public meetups are retarded, posting vehicles is retarded. Posting gun and gun info is better.
>>7350
>It would also be a good way to cultivate a doomsday prepper community.
I agree, fellow mare man! We could also work on assembling a militia and discussing guerilla warfare tactics! Based and redpilled!
>>7351
>Public meet ups are retarded
You don't want to be friends? That's not very loving and tolerant of you. How else could we organize and run drills?
>posting vehicles is retarded
How else will we identify one another at thehoneypot for retards stupid enough to post their guns on a /pol/ board friendship blowout? What, are you a glownigger trying to demoralize and discourage real life activism?
>>7352
No way, my fellow horse homie! I totally don't think that adding a /k/ board be would the single most self-destructive and retarded thing this site could possibly do. It's smartest idea I've ever heard, in fact... Glowniggers would really hate it if we did that!
>It would also be a good way to cultivate a doomsday prepper community.
I agree, fellow mare man! We could also work on assembling a militia and discussing guerilla warfare tactics! Based and redpilled!
>>7351
>Public meet ups are retarded
You don't want to be friends? That's not very loving and tolerant of you. How else could we organize and run drills?
>posting vehicles is retarded
How else will we identify one another at the
>>7352
No way, my fellow horse homie! I totally don't think that adding a /k/ board be would the single most self-destructive and retarded thing this site could possibly do. It's smartest idea I've ever heard, in fact... Glowniggers would really hate it if we did that!
>>7353
Consider moving this discussion to Lotus's thread about the /k/ board. This thread is about the proposal to split up /vx/.
Consider moving this discussion to Lotus's thread about the /k/ board. This thread is about the proposal to split up /vx/.
>>7353
There are no serial numbers on 3D printed guns. Feds cannot track us through our 3D printed guns if we download the gun files using tor.
There are no serial numbers on 3D printed guns. Feds cannot track us through our 3D printed guns if we download the gun files using tor.
>>7355
You do realize that feds swarm all over anything related to 3d guns like flies on shit, don't you? Of all the places you could post firearms and general weaponry shit, why would you specifically want to do it here? There are countless other sites you could do it on rather than practically inviting bad actors here with your ass in the air and snacks on the table.
Mixing /k/ with /pol/ will lead to fedposting and gay ops that will destroy this site. You can't possibly be myopic enough to not see how readily it would be exploited.
>>7354
I completely understand if mods need to move this discussion.
You do realize that feds swarm all over anything related to 3d guns like flies on shit, don't you? Of all the places you could post firearms and general weaponry shit, why would you specifically want to do it here? There are countless other sites you could do it on rather than practically inviting bad actors here with your ass in the air and snacks on the table.
Mixing /k/ with /pol/ will lead to fedposting and gay ops that will destroy this site. You can't possibly be myopic enough to not see how readily it would be exploited.
>>7354
I completely understand if mods need to move this discussion.
>>6590
I would like to bring to any horsefucker attention the unrelentless push to atomize /mlpol/ in a million pieces, given the size of the community, such a push will unavoidable create still more ghost boards and reduce its activity as a whole.
Take a look at the latest campaign to drive /pol/ posting out. Such a harassment campaign is not random and requires administrative action to neutralize it.
I would like to bring to any horsefucker attention the unrelentless push to atomize /mlpol/ in a million pieces, given the size of the community, such a push will unavoidable create still more ghost boards and reduce its activity as a whole.
Take a look at the latest campaign to drive /pol/ posting out. Such a harassment campaign is not random and requires administrative action to neutralize it.
Anonymous
No.7359
>>7358
>create still more ghost boards and reduce its activity as a whole.
That is a valid concern, but I disagree. /vx/ elements could be so much better than the board is now.
>create still more ghost boards and reduce its activity as a whole.
That is a valid concern, but I disagree. /vx/ elements could be so much better than the board is now.
Anonymous
No.7364
>>7358
Pretty much this. Off boarders are obviously trying to pit /pol/ and /mlp/ against each other as /mlp/ is autistic and most of nu /pol/ is literally retarded.
It's seem inevitable that the site will die a slow death of a thousand cuts at this point. That's assuming the current board natives aren't smart enough to avoid the bait, which """we""" obviously aren't. It seems like the flash in the pan moment that lead to /mlpol/ may be over as times, and anons, have changed. The short bus is finally running out of gas and a lot of anons are still in denial.
It's been a fun ride at least.
Pretty much this. Off boarders are obviously trying to pit /pol/ and /mlp/ against each other as /mlp/ is autistic and most of nu /pol/ is literally retarded.
It's seem inevitable that the site will die a slow death of a thousand cuts at this point. That's assuming the current board natives aren't smart enough to avoid the bait, which """we""" obviously aren't. It seems like the flash in the pan moment that lead to /mlpol/ may be over as times, and anons, have changed. The short bus is finally running out of gas and a lot of anons are still in denial.
It's been a fun ride at least.
I don't trust whoever wants ponies split from politics. But there can be no cool gun threads and pony gun threads until /k/ exists or gets merged with something funny.
/fitlit/ was a good idea. What was /k/ merged with back when /mlpol/ was on 4chan?
/fitlit/ was a good idea. What was /k/ merged with back when /mlpol/ was on 4chan?
Anonymous
No.7367
>>7366
The other thread is about the /k/ board. This thread is about splitting up /vx/, with a passing suggestion of /kx/. It's not the primary topic.
I want /vint/ and /hp/.
The other thread is about the /k/ board. This thread is about splitting up /vx/, with a passing suggestion of /kx/. It's not the primary topic.
I want /vint/ and /hp/.
Anonymous
No.7368
>>7366
I don't trust you, because I don't know what bunker chan is. Where are people supposed to go for their pony gun content? How am I supposed to get Rainbow Dash stickers that will perfectly fit a 3D Printed gun?
I don't trust you, because I don't know what bunker chan is. Where are people supposed to go for their pony gun content? How am I supposed to get Rainbow Dash stickers that will perfectly fit a 3D Printed gun?
Since the staff have demonstrated willingness to revise the site lately, could we reopen the conversation to clean up, replace, and/or reform /vx/?
>>9720
/vx/ should be made into /games/ which includes both table top and vidya and just make a regular ol' /x/ board.
/vx/ should be made into /games/ which includes both table top and vidya and just make a regular ol' /x/ board.
>>9735
Yeah, at the very least split /v/ from the /x/. Combining tabletop/Vidya with /x/ does /x/ no justice, because it just contributes to the fake, larpy nature.
Imo, roleplay is such a large faction that it could be its own board.
Maybe split if /x/ and merge it with /k/, for /kx/ schizoposting.
Most of the catalog of /vx/ could really just be archived. It's all dead threads.
Yeah, at the very least split /v/ from the /x/. Combining tabletop/Vidya with /x/ does /x/ no justice, because it just contributes to the fake, larpy nature.
Imo, roleplay is such a large faction that it could be its own board.
Maybe split if /x/ and merge it with /k/, for /kx/ schizoposting.
Most of the catalog of /vx/ could really just be archived. It's all dead threads.
>>6590
I miss teacher-anon drawings, does anyone have the full comic to this point?
>>9767
>contributes to the fake, larpy nature.
As an ex /x/phile, thats great. Keep the "no one" schizos away by keeping the board light-hearted.
/x/ used to be a spooky board for spooky stuff, including spooky stories, curses, paranormal stuff, you name it.
And since /vx/ is already a dead board, what would be the point in making a split? You will just end-up with 2 dead boards instead of one, like cyb, for example.
I miss teacher-anon drawings, does anyone have the full comic to this point?
>>9767
>contributes to the fake, larpy nature.
As an ex /x/phile, thats great. Keep the "no one" schizos away by keeping the board light-hearted.
/x/ used to be a spooky board for spooky stuff, including spooky stories, curses, paranormal stuff, you name it.
And since /vx/ is already a dead board, what would be the point in making a split? You will just end-up with 2 dead boards instead of one, like cyb, for example.
>>9768
>As an ex /x/phile, thats great. Keep the "no one" schizos away by keeping the board light-hearted.
Maybe, but some other /x/philes don't appreciate having their serious discussions conflated with D&D silliness.
Similarly, some oldfags ttrpg enjoyers still remember the Satanic Panic, and don't necessarily appreciate their fantasy magic being conflated with actual occultism.
I am not s regular /x/ user, so I can't really speak for /x/, but after using /vx/ as a regular for 8 years, I haven't seen a lot of synergy.
>And since /vx/ is already a dead board, what would be the point in making a split? You will just end-up with 2 dead boards instead of one, like /cyb/
A fresh board is better than an old dead board with threads from 8 years ago. An old dead board acts like a gangrenous limb and actually quashes content creation; because new users visit the board, see that it's been dead for years, and then give up on it because they have no interest in necrobuming ancient threads made by anyone no longer present. /vx/ is especially egregious, because it has an endless catalog with old threads stating forever even though they should be archived.
With new boards, people would at least see them as a blank slate with potential to fill with their own content (at least at first), instead of an ominous graveyard better left undisturbed.
Imo, /cyb/ could just be deleted, and only be remade if anons with interest in actually posting to it request that it be made again for /g/ posting. Idk though.
>As an ex /x/phile, thats great. Keep the "no one" schizos away by keeping the board light-hearted.
Maybe, but some other /x/philes don't appreciate having their serious discussions conflated with D&D silliness.
Similarly, some oldfags ttrpg enjoyers still remember the Satanic Panic, and don't necessarily appreciate their fantasy magic being conflated with actual occultism.
I am not s regular /x/ user, so I can't really speak for /x/, but after using /vx/ as a regular for 8 years, I haven't seen a lot of synergy.
>And since /vx/ is already a dead board, what would be the point in making a split? You will just end-up with 2 dead boards instead of one, like /cyb/
A fresh board is better than an old dead board with threads from 8 years ago. An old dead board acts like a gangrenous limb and actually quashes content creation; because new users visit the board, see that it's been dead for years, and then give up on it because they have no interest in necrobuming ancient threads made by anyone no longer present. /vx/ is especially egregious, because it has an endless catalog with old threads stating forever even though they should be archived.
With new boards, people would at least see them as a blank slate with potential to fill with their own content (at least at first), instead of an ominous graveyard better left undisturbed.
Imo, /cyb/ could just be deleted, and only be remade if anons with interest in actually posting to it request that it be made again for /g/ posting. Idk though.
>>9883
>Do not mix guns and schizophrenia.
Sometimes it's fun to mix guns and schizophrenia.
>>9771
>With new boards, people would at least see them as a blank slate with potential to fill with their own content (at least at first), instead of an ominous graveyard better left undisturbed.
I do agree that a board full of dead threads is not particularly interesting for anons, but a new, empty board that gets less than 10 threads a week is also not really interesting.
I see many altchans create a ton of boards, and in the end only have 1 or 2 actually active ones, I don't think mlpol has enough traffic to sub-divide discussion into many, many boards, that's my point.
Your points are valid, thought, I don't usually think much of the sensibilities of the posters because, well, I'm desensitized to it so it does not make much sense in my brain, so I got to give it to you, /tg/ would probably hate occult stuff alongside their board stuff, and /x/ schizos would hate LARP besides their 'totally very serious' occult stuff.
>Do not mix guns and schizophrenia.
Sometimes it's fun to mix guns and schizophrenia.
>>9771
>With new boards, people would at least see them as a blank slate with potential to fill with their own content (at least at first), instead of an ominous graveyard better left undisturbed.
I do agree that a board full of dead threads is not particularly interesting for anons, but a new, empty board that gets less than 10 threads a week is also not really interesting.
I see many altchans create a ton of boards, and in the end only have 1 or 2 actually active ones, I don't think mlpol has enough traffic to sub-divide discussion into many, many boards, that's my point.
Your points are valid, thought, I don't usually think much of the sensibilities of the posters because, well, I'm desensitized to it so it does not make much sense in my brain, so I got to give it to you, /tg/ would probably hate occult stuff alongside their board stuff, and /x/ schizos would hate LARP besides their 'totally very serious' occult stuff.
Maybe turn /vx/ into /vq/ video games and quests and then make /x/ into a stand alone board.
Anonymous
No.10333
>>10334
/kx/ is asking for the site to get shut down. Maybe /xo/ cars and paranormal would be less harmful and still potentially a lot of fun.
/kx/ is asking for the site to get shut down. Maybe /xo/ cars and paranormal would be less harmful and still potentially a lot of fun.
>>10335
>/kx/ is asking for the site to get shut down
Just don't post illegal content. We have mods here.
>harmful
Nothing is harmful about guns.
>/kx/ is asking for the site to get shut down
Just don't post illegal content. We have mods here.
>harmful
Nothing is harmful about guns.
>>10337
The mentally ill are legally prevented from owning guns. Red flag laws will get an /xk/ board shut down. I don't see why we couldn't just have a separate stand alone /k/ board in addition to /xo/. We have an /a/ board. Besides /xo/ kisses and hugs. It makes for a safe space to talk about ghosts and cars.
The mentally ill are legally prevented from owning guns. Red flag laws will get an /xk/ board shut down. I don't see why we couldn't just have a separate stand alone /k/ board in addition to /xo/. We have an /a/ board. Besides /xo/ kisses and hugs. It makes for a safe space to talk about ghosts and cars.
>>10338
>The mentally ill are legally prevented from owning guns. Red flag laws will get an /xk/ board shut down.
That's not how red flag laws work.
>I don't see why we couldn't just have a separate stand alone /k/ board in addition to /xo/.
Why even bother combining /x/ and /o/ then?
>The mentally ill are legally prevented from owning guns. Red flag laws will get an /xk/ board shut down.
That's not how red flag laws work.
>I don't see why we couldn't just have a separate stand alone /k/ board in addition to /xo/.
Why even bother combining /x/ and /o/ then?
Anonymous
No.10340
Make sure you don't speak wrongly of Mlpol-tan
Anonymous
No.10341
>ban evading
Do not speak ill or wrongly of Mlpol-tan
Do not speak ill or wrongly of Mlpol-tan
>>10339
>That's not how red flag laws work.
Schizophrenia and guns don't mix and could get the site shut down. I don't know why that isn't obvious to you.
>Why even bother combining /x/ and /o/ then?
I guess we don't have to, but I thought /xo/ sounded fun and schizos love pattern seeking so cars would be fun for them and this community doesn't have anywhere to discuss cars.
>That's not how red flag laws work.
Schizophrenia and guns don't mix and could get the site shut down. I don't know why that isn't obvious to you.
>Why even bother combining /x/ and /o/ then?
I guess we don't have to, but I thought /xo/ sounded fun and schizos love pattern seeking so cars would be fun for them and this community doesn't have anywhere to discuss cars.
>>10342
>Schizophrenia and guns don't mix
Untrue.
>could get the site shut down
How?
Just scrub any illegal content on sight. Jannies scrub the cheese pizza bots every day. They can scrub schizo's posting illegal content.
>Schizophrenia and guns don't mix
Untrue.
>could get the site shut down
How?
Just scrub any illegal content on sight. Jannies scrub the cheese pizza bots every day. They can scrub schizo's posting illegal content.
FEMOID ALERT!!!
WTF is this shit? Why trying to scramble/unscramble the boards again? Why making modifications? Why trying to embed a guns board again?
BTW, I know pretty well the answers/excuses and I'm not impressed.
Let everything how it is for Celestia's sake.
WTF is this shit? Why trying to scramble/unscramble the boards again? Why making modifications? Why trying to embed a guns board again?
BTW, I know pretty well the answers/excuses and I'm not impressed.
Let everything how it is for Celestia's sake.
Anonymous
No.10348
>>10346
>Why trying to embed a guns board again?
Because 4chan /k/ has been unusable since the war in Ukraine.
>Why trying to embed a guns board again?
Because 4chan /k/ has been unusable since the war in Ukraine.
And here's another suggestion. Make ninjaz a mod on the /vq/ and/or /ox/ boards so he can have his own little space to protect without destroying the rest of the site.
>>10351
>on a board full of schizophrenia.
The schizo's are here whether you like it or not. They are already on the site, and will be, especially so long as there is an /x/ board of any kind.
>>10350
This.
I was against /vx/ in its inception, and although I went on to be one of the most prolific posters there, I still think it could be better.
Also, the board is overdue for renovations anyway. Every thread ever made there is still on the catalog. The dead threads should be archived.
>>10352
That is a terrible idea. Do not humor him.
>on a board full of schizophrenia.
The schizo's are here whether you like it or not. They are already on the site, and will be, especially so long as there is an /x/ board of any kind.
>>10350
This.
I was against /vx/ in its inception, and although I went on to be one of the most prolific posters there, I still think it could be better.
Also, the board is overdue for renovations anyway. Every thread ever made there is still on the catalog. The dead threads should be archived.
>>10352
That is a terrible idea. Do not humor him.
>>10353
I'm not humoring him. I think ninjaz is fucking retarded and has very serious character flaws BUT he does care about the part of the community he participates in. I think he would make a decent janny on a /vq/ or /ox/ board. I will even volunteer to be a mod on the /ox/ board because I know a bit about cars and can keep him in check. If accepted I would also like to moderate /cyb/ even though it is mostly dead.
I'm not humoring him. I think ninjaz is fucking retarded and has very serious character flaws BUT he does care about the part of the community he participates in. I think he would make a decent janny on a /vq/ or /ox/ board. I will even volunteer to be a mod on the /ox/ board because I know a bit about cars and can keep him in check. If accepted I would also like to moderate /cyb/ even though it is mostly dead.
>>10353
>The schizo's are here whether you like it or not. They are already on the site, and will be
Yes they will, but let's not tempt fate by making the weapons board also the schizo board.
>The schizo's are here whether you like it or not. They are already on the site, and will be
Yes they will, but let's not tempt fate by making the weapons board also the schizo board.
Anonymous
No.10357
>>10355
I am going to go to bat for him even though I don't like him. I've actually met the dude IRL. He cares for a lot of people and animals. He is an idiot, but he isn't a bad person. I think if given his own little slice where he can't destroy the rest of the site he would mellow out. He doesn't come here to discuss politics. He comes here to RP and talk about /x/ shit. He helped the site get started with funding and he does care about this community even if he is a moron.
I am going to go to bat for him even though I don't like him. I've actually met the dude IRL. He cares for a lot of people and animals. He is an idiot, but he isn't a bad person. I think if given his own little slice where he can't destroy the rest of the site he would mellow out. He doesn't come here to discuss politics. He comes here to RP and talk about /x/ shit. He helped the site get started with funding and he does care about this community even if he is a moron.
>>10360
>He is an idiot, but he isn't a bad person.
I agree, but he has a mayor problem, he can't refrain himself from antagonizing the management and that's a no-no. In other words, he is suffering from low-impulse control and gets him in trouble over and over again.
>He is an idiot, but he isn't a bad person.
I agree, but he has a mayor problem, he can't refrain himself from antagonizing the management and that's a no-no. In other words, he is suffering from low-impulse control and gets him in trouble over and over again.
>>10361
No
>>10362
I think adding him to management would make him understand the shit that mods get especially if he was given a low position in a small board where he was one of the primary users. What makes /mlpol/ great is that the mods are users of the site.
No
>>10362
I think adding him to management would make him understand the shit that mods get especially if he was given a low position in a small board where he was one of the primary users. What makes /mlpol/ great is that the mods are users of the site.
>>10364
>I think adding him to management
Wasn't he the one expelled for betraying the user's privacy?
>I think adding him to management
Wasn't he the one expelled for betraying the user's privacy?
>>10366
is V really exist in that thread? no one really talks about video games , or even if they do , it is a pony game related
just saying
is V really exist in that thread? no one really talks about video games , or even if they do , it is a pony game related
just saying
Ribozyme
No.10374
>>10368
I see. The /vint/ idea is good especially if it informally includes /qst/ stuff. And a stand alone /x/ could work. But then there is no board for guns or cars. /ko/?
I see. The /vint/ idea is good especially if it informally includes /qst/ stuff. And a stand alone /x/ could work. But then there is no board for guns or cars. /ko/?
where do we even talk about humanities stuff?
history , philosophy , language , etc etc
history , philosophy , language , etc etc
>>10370
Maybe janny positions would be better than mod positions for ninjaz or myself.
>>10375
/mlpol/ and /ub/ a stand alone /x/ board could host religious discussions too.
Maybe janny positions would be better than mod positions for ninjaz or myself.
>>10375
/mlpol/ and /ub/ a stand alone /x/ board could host religious discussions too.
>>10378
/sp/ is more or less our /b/ board. I was the one who suggested we make something like /b/ and I'm glad /sp/ turned out the way it did. It really is something unique.
/sp/ is more or less our /b/ board. I was the one who suggested we make something like /b/ and I'm glad /sp/ turned out the way it did. It really is something unique.
Ribozyme
No.10382
>>10381
I actually was. I remember when the 4troons jannies shut down the board too. I also remember the round of /qa/ raids where we actually found some common ground with some of the /jp/sies.
I actually was. I remember when the 4troons jannies shut down the board too. I also remember the round of /qa/ raids where we actually found some common ground with some of the /jp/sies.
Anonymous
No.10385
>>10383
>>10384
Wtf?
>>10384
Wtf?
Anonymous
No.10386
>>10383
Please tell me you didn't kill anyone.
Please tell me you didn't kill anyone.
Anonymous
No.10387
>>10384
Nobody is dead, right?
Nobody is dead, right?
Anonymous
No.10388
>>10383
did not you said that in /1ntr/ already? like yesterday
did not you said that in /1ntr/ already? like yesterday
Anonymous
No.10392
But yes, the doggos got kill
Anonymous
No.10393
>>10360
>He cares for a lot of people and animals
Dude, his insane rantings over the past two days have largely been about him killing a dog. He has sent me multiple threats of violence through reports. Fuck no he does not care for people.
I used to play a game with him. He brought so much drama to the game that it was affecting my mental health and made me want to quit. I opened up about how the drama was affecting my mental health, and everyone was sympathetic except for him, who just continued insane rantings, completely tone death. No, I really don't think he cares for anything except that he likes to be angry.
You're right that he doesn't come here to discuss politics. Close everything that he's posted on the board this year has been him ranting about one thing or another that made him angry. That's why he's banned. Because I told him to stop ranting about how much he hates some particular person for a while, and he couldn't go more than 20 hours without spamming the discord or the board with how much he hates that person.
>He cares for a lot of people and animals
Dude, his insane rantings over the past two days have largely been about him killing a dog. He has sent me multiple threats of violence through reports. Fuck no he does not care for people.
I used to play a game with him. He brought so much drama to the game that it was affecting my mental health and made me want to quit. I opened up about how the drama was affecting my mental health, and everyone was sympathetic except for him, who just continued insane rantings, completely tone death. No, I really don't think he cares for anything except that he likes to be angry.
You're right that he doesn't come here to discuss politics. Close everything that he's posted on the board this year has been him ranting about one thing or another that made him angry. That's why he's banned. Because I told him to stop ranting about how much he hates some particular person for a while, and he couldn't go more than 20 hours without spamming the discord or the board with how much he hates that person.
>>10364
>>10354
Did you not know that he actually was on staff at one point?
Back in 2018 I asked to have him added since he was a friend. I don’t think he was so messed up in the head at the time. He was fairly good at finding spam since he was always online and was attentive to the board. The first problems arise when he attempted to interact with other staff members. Staff rules at the time required moderation actions to be posted in the staff chat, either for discussion or at least for notice that an action has already taken place. So he’d make a post about something going on in some thread, but it would be vague and not detailed enough to know what was going on unless you were there, in that thread. However, most of the staff members have lives and jobs, so we didn’t necessarily know exactly what was going on when he referenced things. We’d ask clarifying questions, and he’d get pissed off at us for not already knowing what he was talking about.
One day, he rage quit the discord server. But he didn’t quit staff. Instead, he would engage in moderation activities like banning and deleting posts while refusing to even be able to communicate to other staff members. Again, this was not acceptable under staff rules. He wouod post about actions in a discord server that was not relayed to staff. When I asked him about it, he said “every member of staff that I respect is in that server.”
One day I got a message from Pupperwoff saying we needed to talk about him. I was expecting pupper to say that he needed to be fired. That is what I had thought, given how blatantly he was ignoring staff rules. But instead, they were going to make him an admin.
Apparently, he had told Pupper or maybe it was Atlas (the founder) that he must either be made admin or quit. They came up with some whole complicated arrangement with Atlas stepping down, Pupper as the new site owner, and then three administrators, with the theory that there would be a 2-1 vote on any more serious actions. I thought all of this was a terrible idea and was very much against it, t everyone else made it happen.
The first major blow up he had was against, of all people, Pupper. He decided one day to take a users post and edit its contents to something along the lines of “I’m a faggot.” Pupper absolutely hated this and was vehemently against it. He insisted that it was allowed by staff rules and that it was fine. Now, I actually agreed with him over Pupper in this, because that user (it was probably Nigel) deserved it, but I knew that Pupper was very much invested in “no edits,” so the proper thing to do would have been to just agree not to do it again. But he couldn’t do that. Instead, he argued for hours and developed some kind of vendetta against pupper. Pupper actually reciprocated the negative feelings. If you don’t know Pupper, please know that he’s very kind and extremely difficult to rouse to a lasting anger. Pissing him of all people off is a rare accomplishment. He also managed to piss off another member of staff who was already calling for him to be removed.
I had my own problems with him. He loved to get into arguments with people on the board, and then post in moderator capcodes as what I assume is some kind of show of force to win the argument. Besides this, he would post in capcodes often and very unprofessionally, posting things like vague threats. He would do this anonymously. I wanted to ban all anonymous-cap code posting and force him to use a name. Of course this didn’t come to anything because he refused any limit of any kind on his behavior.
He developed grudges against every member of staff who expressed any problem with anything he did, which was the great majority of the staff. He was purely vitriolic in every conversation in staff chat. After one especially bad discussion where he was incredibly rude to everyone, Pupper declared that he was removed from Admin rank. He claimed Pupper couldn’t do this under the rules, but obviously no one was against this move. I tried to mediate between him and Pupper to see if they could come to some kind of agreement or détente. When I asked what his demand were, it was very clear. He wanted to be allowed to moderate the board however he pleased with no limits or restrictions of anyone disagreeing with how he acted. Obviously this was not going to come to anything.
One day I saw him getting into an argument with someone, and at the end of it, deleted that users post. I was going to recommend he be fired, but before I could do that, he had left staff chat and had sent a different moderator a message that he had quit. Pupper was sure to disable his moderator account. He would start sending messages in reports about how he respected the 1/3 of moderators who didn’t talk in staff chat or didn’t engage in arguments, but didn’t respect most of the staff members, who of course took issue with his behavior.
Over the next couple years he’d go on screeds against staff, like one time claiming he was exposing some giant staff conspiracy by talking about the /Test/ board.
I went back through old messages and screencaps. He was just as much of a vitriolic rager in 2021 and 2023 as he is now. No change, really.
No I don’t think he’s fit for staff.
>>10354
Did you not know that he actually was on staff at one point?
Back in 2018 I asked to have him added since he was a friend. I don’t think he was so messed up in the head at the time. He was fairly good at finding spam since he was always online and was attentive to the board. The first problems arise when he attempted to interact with other staff members. Staff rules at the time required moderation actions to be posted in the staff chat, either for discussion or at least for notice that an action has already taken place. So he’d make a post about something going on in some thread, but it would be vague and not detailed enough to know what was going on unless you were there, in that thread. However, most of the staff members have lives and jobs, so we didn’t necessarily know exactly what was going on when he referenced things. We’d ask clarifying questions, and he’d get pissed off at us for not already knowing what he was talking about.
One day, he rage quit the discord server. But he didn’t quit staff. Instead, he would engage in moderation activities like banning and deleting posts while refusing to even be able to communicate to other staff members. Again, this was not acceptable under staff rules. He wouod post about actions in a discord server that was not relayed to staff. When I asked him about it, he said “every member of staff that I respect is in that server.”
One day I got a message from Pupperwoff saying we needed to talk about him. I was expecting pupper to say that he needed to be fired. That is what I had thought, given how blatantly he was ignoring staff rules. But instead, they were going to make him an admin.
Apparently, he had told Pupper or maybe it was Atlas (the founder) that he must either be made admin or quit. They came up with some whole complicated arrangement with Atlas stepping down, Pupper as the new site owner, and then three administrators, with the theory that there would be a 2-1 vote on any more serious actions. I thought all of this was a terrible idea and was very much against it, t everyone else made it happen.
The first major blow up he had was against, of all people, Pupper. He decided one day to take a users post and edit its contents to something along the lines of “I’m a faggot.” Pupper absolutely hated this and was vehemently against it. He insisted that it was allowed by staff rules and that it was fine. Now, I actually agreed with him over Pupper in this, because that user (it was probably Nigel) deserved it, but I knew that Pupper was very much invested in “no edits,” so the proper thing to do would have been to just agree not to do it again. But he couldn’t do that. Instead, he argued for hours and developed some kind of vendetta against pupper. Pupper actually reciprocated the negative feelings. If you don’t know Pupper, please know that he’s very kind and extremely difficult to rouse to a lasting anger. Pissing him of all people off is a rare accomplishment. He also managed to piss off another member of staff who was already calling for him to be removed.
I had my own problems with him. He loved to get into arguments with people on the board, and then post in moderator capcodes as what I assume is some kind of show of force to win the argument. Besides this, he would post in capcodes often and very unprofessionally, posting things like vague threats. He would do this anonymously. I wanted to ban all anonymous-cap code posting and force him to use a name. Of course this didn’t come to anything because he refused any limit of any kind on his behavior.
He developed grudges against every member of staff who expressed any problem with anything he did, which was the great majority of the staff. He was purely vitriolic in every conversation in staff chat. After one especially bad discussion where he was incredibly rude to everyone, Pupper declared that he was removed from Admin rank. He claimed Pupper couldn’t do this under the rules, but obviously no one was against this move. I tried to mediate between him and Pupper to see if they could come to some kind of agreement or détente. When I asked what his demand were, it was very clear. He wanted to be allowed to moderate the board however he pleased with no limits or restrictions of anyone disagreeing with how he acted. Obviously this was not going to come to anything.
One day I saw him getting into an argument with someone, and at the end of it, deleted that users post. I was going to recommend he be fired, but before I could do that, he had left staff chat and had sent a different moderator a message that he had quit. Pupper was sure to disable his moderator account. He would start sending messages in reports about how he respected the 1/3 of moderators who didn’t talk in staff chat or didn’t engage in arguments, but didn’t respect most of the staff members, who of course took issue with his behavior.
Over the next couple years he’d go on screeds against staff, like one time claiming he was exposing some giant staff conspiracy by talking about the /Test/ board.
I went back through old messages and screencaps. He was just as much of a vitriolic rager in 2021 and 2023 as he is now. No change, really.
No I don’t think he’s fit for staff.
>>10360
> I think if given his own little slice where he can't destroy the rest of the site he would mellow out.
I have tried so very, very hard over several months this year to get him to stop intentionally disrupting threads he didn’t like and to mellow out, and he unequivocally refused He has been told repeatedly, “post anywhere you like, just leave us alone here” and he’s refused. He’s been told repeatedly “I need you to just stop constantly spraying angry posts” and he’s refused.
A different staff member put it best:
He is “like the autistic kid who sits in the back of the car shouting about how his brother was on his side of the seat for a fraction of a second, and it's the greatest injustice in history, and then will just keep ranting about it for the next four hours nonstop, no matter what you say to him… Like all I want to do is just pull the car over at the next rest stop, "accidentally" forget him in the bathroom, drive to the nearest bar and down an entire quart of tequila, and hope the situation just sorts itself out somehow.”
This has been ongoing for more than four years. You have no idea. He was actually banned off of the website back in 2023. And I’ve found ban evading posts from that time where he’s promising “ I will do what I please.” He was allowed back on in September of 2024 because he sounded sincerely apologetic. We were hoping he’d have decent behavior. Instead, he’s worse than before. So he’s definitely not allowed back. We know he does not want to control himself, and he probably cannot.
> I think if given his own little slice where he can't destroy the rest of the site he would mellow out.
I have tried so very, very hard over several months this year to get him to stop intentionally disrupting threads he didn’t like and to mellow out, and he unequivocally refused He has been told repeatedly, “post anywhere you like, just leave us alone here” and he’s refused. He’s been told repeatedly “I need you to just stop constantly spraying angry posts” and he’s refused.
A different staff member put it best:
He is “like the autistic kid who sits in the back of the car shouting about how his brother was on his side of the seat for a fraction of a second, and it's the greatest injustice in history, and then will just keep ranting about it for the next four hours nonstop, no matter what you say to him… Like all I want to do is just pull the car over at the next rest stop, "accidentally" forget him in the bathroom, drive to the nearest bar and down an entire quart of tequila, and hope the situation just sorts itself out somehow.”
This has been ongoing for more than four years. You have no idea. He was actually banned off of the website back in 2023. And I’ve found ban evading posts from that time where he’s promising “ I will do what I please.” He was allowed back on in September of 2024 because he sounded sincerely apologetic. We were hoping he’d have decent behavior. Instead, he’s worse than before. So he’s definitely not allowed back. We know he does not want to control himself, and he probably cannot.
BoomBoom
No.10399
Anonymous
No.10401
>>10397
damn , that sounded traumatizing for you anon
sorry to hear that
about thr animal abuse , i have a feeling he is just being edgy for attention , i hope
damn , that sounded traumatizing for you anon
sorry to hear that
about thr animal abuse , i have a feeling he is just being edgy for attention , i hope
>>10360
Here is my take on him, for whatever it's worth. He can be a decent enough guy when he wants to be. The problem is that most of the time he chooses to be a gigantic, gaping asshole instead. He is impossible to work with and has burned literally every bridge that has ever been extended to him. Bringing him back on as a mod or janny in any capacity I can tell you right away is a non-starter; not one single person currently on staff would support it.
He gets insanely angry over the smallest, stupidest things. He takes minor squabbles over these small, stupid things, and turns them into long, drawn out arguments that go on five-ever, until eventually you just get exhausted and stop replying to him. An argument with Ninjas is basically an argument with a screeching, incoherent toddler who refuses to yield any ground, no matter how ridiculous or indefensible his position may be.
He can't handle having any limits imposed on him at all. He will start brawls over the smallest things, and hold grudges long past their reasonable expiration dates. Some of his recent tirades reference events from the Mixed Nuts thread, which literally hasn't existed in years. As >>10397 hi lotus explains, when he was on staff he was constantly picking fights with everyone and turning minor policy disagreements into shouting matches that went on for hours. Even Pupper, who is probably the nicest guy in the world, lost his temper with him a few times. He sabotages himself by alienating literally everyone who tries to meet him halfway, including people who might be on his side of an argument or at the very least would be willing to hear him out. Then he acts like he's being treated unfairly when he ends up getting banned/disciplined/admin credentials revoked/whatever because he won't stop acting like an insufferable cunt.
To cite a recent example, a couple of months ago he was involved in some kind of altercation with another user in one of the game threads, and was apparently being a big enough dick about it that he wound up getting banned I don't really pay attention to the game threads so I don't know the specifics; at this point it doesn't really matter since he's ban-evaded so many times the reason for the initial ban is completely beside the point. Instead of just accepting his ban or working his differences out with the relevant parties, he's chosen to ban-evade on a near daily basis while thumbing his nose at mods, and spam our reports and appeals systems with incoherent rants and vague personal threats. He's also been rapid-firing angry Discord PMs at me for the last couple of months. I stopped replying to him ages ago; it doesn't phase him a bit, he just keeps shouting into the void. As with his reports and ban appeals, his PMs are completely incoherent and unhinged. In fact, to this day, I still have no idea wtf he's actually angry about, because he's never bothered to clarify any of it; he just keeps ranting about how his ban was unfair, and how he's going to "expose the truth" about all of us.
And for the record I want to clarify: even with all of this, I honestly do not harbor any personal grudge against him. I just want nothing the fuck to do with him anymore, because he's made it clear that he's completely off his nut. This goes way beyond simple quirky internet autism; the guy has actual mental health problems and needs actual psychiatric help.
Here is my take on him, for whatever it's worth. He can be a decent enough guy when he wants to be. The problem is that most of the time he chooses to be a gigantic, gaping asshole instead. He is impossible to work with and has burned literally every bridge that has ever been extended to him. Bringing him back on as a mod or janny in any capacity I can tell you right away is a non-starter; not one single person currently on staff would support it.
He gets insanely angry over the smallest, stupidest things. He takes minor squabbles over these small, stupid things, and turns them into long, drawn out arguments that go on five-ever, until eventually you just get exhausted and stop replying to him. An argument with Ninjas is basically an argument with a screeching, incoherent toddler who refuses to yield any ground, no matter how ridiculous or indefensible his position may be.
He can't handle having any limits imposed on him at all. He will start brawls over the smallest things, and hold grudges long past their reasonable expiration dates. Some of his recent tirades reference events from the Mixed Nuts thread, which literally hasn't existed in years. As >>10397 hi lotus explains, when he was on staff he was constantly picking fights with everyone and turning minor policy disagreements into shouting matches that went on for hours. Even Pupper, who is probably the nicest guy in the world, lost his temper with him a few times. He sabotages himself by alienating literally everyone who tries to meet him halfway, including people who might be on his side of an argument or at the very least would be willing to hear him out. Then he acts like he's being treated unfairly when he ends up getting banned/disciplined/admin credentials revoked/whatever because he won't stop acting like an insufferable cunt.
To cite a recent example, a couple of months ago he was involved in some kind of altercation with another user in one of the game threads, and was apparently being a big enough dick about it that he wound up getting banned I don't really pay attention to the game threads so I don't know the specifics; at this point it doesn't really matter since he's ban-evaded so many times the reason for the initial ban is completely beside the point. Instead of just accepting his ban or working his differences out with the relevant parties, he's chosen to ban-evade on a near daily basis while thumbing his nose at mods, and spam our reports and appeals systems with incoherent rants and vague personal threats. He's also been rapid-firing angry Discord PMs at me for the last couple of months. I stopped replying to him ages ago; it doesn't phase him a bit, he just keeps shouting into the void. As with his reports and ban appeals, his PMs are completely incoherent and unhinged. In fact, to this day, I still have no idea wtf he's actually angry about, because he's never bothered to clarify any of it; he just keeps ranting about how his ban was unfair, and how he's going to "expose the truth" about all of us.
And for the record I want to clarify: even with all of this, I honestly do not harbor any personal grudge against him. I just want nothing the fuck to do with him anymore, because he's made it clear that he's completely off his nut. This goes way beyond simple quirky internet autism; the guy has actual mental health problems and needs actual psychiatric help.
>>10402
>spam our reports and appeals systems with incoherent rants and vague personal threats
That might explain why the spambot/noncespambot posts stay up for a while, you guys have to sift through his bullshit.
t.bong on a swedish ip cause I want to listen to music
>spam our reports and appeals systems with incoherent rants and vague personal threats
That might explain why the spambot/noncespambot posts stay up for a while, you guys have to sift through his bullshit.
t.bong on a swedish ip cause I want to listen to music
>>10403
Actually yes, we have missed a couple of legitimate reports because they were buried under ninja-rants. I think we may have also mistakenly banned a couple of anons because we thought they were one of his proxies. So yes, at this point he is actually interfering with site operations.
Actually yes, we have missed a couple of legitimate reports because they were buried under ninja-rants. I think we may have also mistakenly banned a couple of anons because we thought they were one of his proxies. So yes, at this point he is actually interfering with site operations.
Anonymous
No.10405
>>10404
>mistakenly banned a couple of anons because we thought they were one of his proxies
Hi
t.bong that's been banned twice for laughing at the turbosperg.
>mistakenly banned a couple of anons because we thought they were one of his proxies
Hi
t.bong that's been banned twice for laughing at the turbosperg.
>>10402
https://ponerpics.org/img/view/2012/6/20/11289.png
>hi lotus
pew pew
>>10402
This is a very good summary, but I have to add that for me, it is just a little bit personal, not the least reason for which is that he tries to make it as personal possible.
I was friends with him once. Thats why I invited him onto staff back in 2019. That’s why I invited him to play games with me after he reached out last September. I was willing to overlook so many faults, and dead God did I ever get stung for it. As stated before, he caused so much drama in my game that it caused several players to quit and threatened to cause another to. It was completely sapping my will to continue, and when I opened up about it he was completely deaf to my issues, not acknowledging them at all. Not only did he rant endlessly because he didn’t get the reaction to a dice roll he wanted, he would send me DMs ranting about a dice outcome on a skill check he didn’t like six months later. I learned to mute his DMs quickly. When he rage quit, no one wanted to stop him, but he kept sperging out in the relevant channels because he has a stalkerish obsession with some other guy. He had been told dozens of times to stop spamming. I didn’t ban him at the beginning of this year precisely because he was my friend, and I was more lenient on him than I would be on a random anon. I think that because he wasn’t banned the first time, or even the second or third time, that it contributed to him thinking he’s completely above the rules and that he’s incapable of doing wrong. No, asswipe, you were banned because you promised to keep disrupting threads into perpetuity. Anyone would be banned for that.
He has threatened other users with doxxing repeatedly. He has tried to blackmail me and staff repeatedly. He has threatened to team up with the soy boys to harm the website. He has personally threatened physical violence against me at Mare Fair 3 three times through his posts and in spam reports. He has had absolutely no respect for any kind of privacy or secrets of others on more occasions than I care to elaborate upon. He just recently posted “I know you have fancy guns [he knows I’m a gun collector] but have your hands ever had to bury bodies?” This cryptic post seemed to be a death threat but was probably him raging about killing those two stray dogs he’s been repeatedly bragging about shooting for several days now.
He definitely has something wrong with his brain. I’m not sure if he was born with brain damage, he acquired it somehow, he’s on drugs, if this is schizophrenia/Bi-polar, if he’s just an asshole, or if it’s some combination of the above, but I know I’ve had enough.
>>10400
Tell me about it. It was obviously a bad idea at the time. However in fairness to everyone who went along with it, he had some kind of mental health breakdown around 2019 or 2020. He was comparatively normal until then.
>>10403
>is a bong
Damn I’m sorry man
https://ponerpics.org/img/view/2012/6/20/11289.png
>hi lotus
pew pew
>>10402
This is a very good summary, but I have to add that for me, it is just a little bit personal, not the least reason for which is that he tries to make it as personal possible.
I was friends with him once. Thats why I invited him onto staff back in 2019. That’s why I invited him to play games with me after he reached out last September. I was willing to overlook so many faults, and dead God did I ever get stung for it. As stated before, he caused so much drama in my game that it caused several players to quit and threatened to cause another to. It was completely sapping my will to continue, and when I opened up about it he was completely deaf to my issues, not acknowledging them at all. Not only did he rant endlessly because he didn’t get the reaction to a dice roll he wanted, he would send me DMs ranting about a dice outcome on a skill check he didn’t like six months later. I learned to mute his DMs quickly. When he rage quit, no one wanted to stop him, but he kept sperging out in the relevant channels because he has a stalkerish obsession with some other guy. He had been told dozens of times to stop spamming. I didn’t ban him at the beginning of this year precisely because he was my friend, and I was more lenient on him than I would be on a random anon. I think that because he wasn’t banned the first time, or even the second or third time, that it contributed to him thinking he’s completely above the rules and that he’s incapable of doing wrong. No, asswipe, you were banned because you promised to keep disrupting threads into perpetuity. Anyone would be banned for that.
He has threatened other users with doxxing repeatedly. He has tried to blackmail me and staff repeatedly. He has threatened to team up with the soy boys to harm the website. He has personally threatened physical violence against me at Mare Fair 3 three times through his posts and in spam reports. He has had absolutely no respect for any kind of privacy or secrets of others on more occasions than I care to elaborate upon. He just recently posted “I know you have fancy guns [he knows I’m a gun collector] but have your hands ever had to bury bodies?” This cryptic post seemed to be a death threat but was probably him raging about killing those two stray dogs he’s been repeatedly bragging about shooting for several days now.
He definitely has something wrong with his brain. I’m not sure if he was born with brain damage, he acquired it somehow, he’s on drugs, if this is schizophrenia/Bi-polar, if he’s just an asshole, or if it’s some combination of the above, but I know I’ve had enough.
>>10400
Tell me about it. It was obviously a bad idea at the time. However in fairness to everyone who went along with it, he had some kind of mental health breakdown around 2019 or 2020. He was comparatively normal until then.
>>10403
>is a bong
Damn I’m sorry man
>>10406
>he had some kind of mental health breakdown around 2019 or 2020. He was comparatively normal until then.
That's a bit of a coincidence to someone I'm aware of. This chap, was he techsavy?
>Damn I’m sorry man
>now bong posting
There's hills and valleys in life, being a bong is all about strife I guess.
>he had some kind of mental health breakdown around 2019 or 2020. He was comparatively normal until then.
That's a bit of a coincidence to someone I'm aware of. This chap, was he techsavy?
>Damn I’m sorry man
>now bong posting
There's hills and valleys in life, being a bong is all about strife I guess.
>>10407
No, he’s not tech savvy at all.
I’m just speculating that he had a mental health breakdown around that time because I could have sworn there was a time that he was… sort of like he is now but not constantly sperging out, and that he was definitely as he is now by late 2020.
No, he’s not tech savvy at all.
I’m just speculating that he had a mental health breakdown around that time because I could have sworn there was a time that he was… sort of like he is now but not constantly sperging out, and that he was definitely as he is now by late 2020.
Do I get to weigh in on this, or is this one of those exercises where everyone says what's on their mind and I'm just supposed to listen?
>>10410
>is this one of those exercises where everyone says what's on their mind and I'm just supposed to listen?
Yup. STFU and listen, please.
>is this one of those exercises where everyone says what's on their mind and I'm just supposed to listen?
Yup. STFU and listen, please.
Let me know when it's my turn, cuz not bring listened to has been the whole problem, aside from the proclivities of individuals who want to pretend they're unassailable
>>10412
>I get the right of redress
I don't think so. Belligerency is undesirable and reaffirm you are going the wrong way. You are being punished for naughty behavior and doubling, triple, quad, quint doubling will make your situation worse.
Remember the old saying, STOP DIGGING.
>I get the right of redress
I don't think so. Belligerency is undesirable and reaffirm you are going the wrong way. You are being punished for naughty behavior and doubling, triple, quad, quint doubling will make your situation worse.
Remember the old saying, STOP DIGGING.
>>10414
You're very silly
But the one thing I'll speak to now is killing a dog. Yes, I did. He killed my oldest of cats. An 18 year old sweetheart who let even the youngest of kitties pick on him. I'm burying 'it' in a few minutes. Thats what happens when you kill something important to me
You're very silly
But the one thing I'll speak to now is killing a dog. Yes, I did. He killed my oldest of cats. An 18 year old sweetheart who let even the youngest of kitties pick on him. I'm burying 'it' in a few minutes. Thats what happens when you kill something important to me
Anonymous
No.10416
How fast can YOU faggots dig a 4'x4'x4' hole?
I'm suffering from Ninjaz fatigue.
Huh, suddenly no one is feeling chatty
>>10402
>most of the time he chooses to be a gigantic, gaping asshole instead
If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized, shall I direct the audience to the hidden place?
>An argument with Ninjas is basically an argument with a screeching, incoherent toddler who refuses to yield any ground, no matter how ridiculous or indefensible his position may be.
It's Ninjaz, with a z, now, please and thank you.
As to the rest, yes. When I know I'm right and the people I'm arguing with are either A. wrong or B. lazy and stupid, I won't let things go. You don't get to slap me across the face a half-dozen times and are forgiven cuz that's what Jesus would want.
Not you, not anyone in particular, but you get my point.
Worse, I know how to be here forever, and yes I DO have the time and the wherewithall.
And yes, when you're being derelict at your job which only amounts to monitoring an anonymous board, I will berate you, however I have to.
>>10402
>most of the time he chooses to be a gigantic, gaping asshole instead
If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized, shall I direct the audience to the hidden place?
>An argument with Ninjas is basically an argument with a screeching, incoherent toddler who refuses to yield any ground, no matter how ridiculous or indefensible his position may be.
It's Ninjaz, with a z, now, please and thank you.
As to the rest, yes. When I know I'm right and the people I'm arguing with are either A. wrong or B. lazy and stupid, I won't let things go. You don't get to slap me across the face a half-dozen times and are forgiven cuz that's what Jesus would want.
Not you, not anyone in particular, but you get my point.
Worse, I know how to be here forever, and yes I DO have the time and the wherewithall.
And yes, when you're being derelict at your job which only amounts to monitoring an anonymous board, I will berate you, however I have to.
>>10406
I will say this. I personally have struggled with bi-polar and the covid days broke me. Ninjaz if you are reading this, please try blue lotus extract in moderation. It can help with this kind of stuff if you can't see a doctor.
I will say this. I personally have struggled with bi-polar and the covid days broke me. Ninjaz if you are reading this, please try blue lotus extract in moderation. It can help with this kind of stuff if you can't see a doctor.
Ribozyme
No.10421
>>10418
Dude sometimes you are just wrong in debates and rather than address why someone thinks you are wrong you simply accuse them of being a shill. It's lazy and it is dishonest. Someone disagreeing with you does not necessarily make them the enemy.
Dude sometimes you are just wrong in debates and rather than address why someone thinks you are wrong you simply accuse them of being a shill. It's lazy and it is dishonest. Someone disagreeing with you does not necessarily make them the enemy.
>>10419
Oh, yes, that. Okay
>cracks knuckles
Lotus and I go way back.
>I asked to have him added because he was a friend
What he means is that when I applied to staff, my position was unassailable, having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point, without recognition.
Pupper was surprised as shit to learn I was the guy. He said something to the effect of
>I wish Mlpol had someone to guarantee it's safety
.. and I was like
<Let me let you in on a little sercret
I'm not the guy anymore, obviously, and all credit to "whoever" is the guy now.
My memory is LONG, and that's your problem
>Staff rules at the time required moderation actions to be posted in the staff chat
Lies, the communication between staff was always shit.
>I'm too busy
>I can't be bothered
>What?
It's almost like you felt that monitoring the site was a privilege and not a duty.
>Make him an admin
So glad this was mentioned. You wanna know WHY? This makes Lotus mad to hear, he'll probably delete this post, but it's because Atlas almost gave the site to me.
Why, you might ask? Because I've been the heart and soul of this site from the beginning.
*flashback sounds*
>If I agree to this, you don't get to act like you own the site or anything like that
<Agreed. Ideas and information are all that are important, regardless of who is saying it
>Okay, but why?
<Because I want there to be an Mlpol. I don't care for how many it is, I want it for ME. That others can enjoy the spoils is irrelevant.
<I didn't plan this, but you sealed the deal with your post against GR15DF. "Clippity Cloppity, get off my property". I thought you'd try to negotiate
>Fuck that nigger
<And that right there, is why
*unflashbacking sounds*
>He decided one day to take a users post and edit its contents to something along the lines of
Oh you want to go there? Hehe.
The user in question was Nigel. He was being a problem at the time, one to which I volunteered to address.
Now mind you, Nigel can be a bit much
<Says you
QUIET. During one of Nigel's particularly egregious sperg-sessions I made a comment in staff discord about it.
I was advised to either edit or delete the post.
By Lotus.
I did so (edit).
It was much later that Pupper lost his shit about it.
>I had my own problems with him
This entire paragraph is revisionist history
>He was purely vitriolic in every conversation in staff chat
Only to those who were being derelict
Remember the time Lotus changed my staff password because I stopped him from abusing >That Guy?
Pepperidge Farms remembers
Oh, yes, that. Okay
>cracks knuckles
Lotus and I go way back.
>I asked to have him added because he was a friend
What he means is that when I applied to staff, my position was unassailable, having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point, without recognition.
Pupper was surprised as shit to learn I was the guy. He said something to the effect of
>I wish Mlpol had someone to guarantee it's safety
.. and I was like
<Let me let you in on a little sercret
I'm not the guy anymore, obviously, and all credit to "whoever" is the guy now.
My memory is LONG, and that's your problem
>Staff rules at the time required moderation actions to be posted in the staff chat
Lies, the communication between staff was always shit.
>I'm too busy
>I can't be bothered
>What?
It's almost like you felt that monitoring the site was a privilege and not a duty.
>Make him an admin
So glad this was mentioned. You wanna know WHY? This makes Lotus mad to hear, he'll probably delete this post, but it's because Atlas almost gave the site to me.
Why, you might ask? Because I've been the heart and soul of this site from the beginning.
*flashback sounds*
>If I agree to this, you don't get to act like you own the site or anything like that
<Agreed. Ideas and information are all that are important, regardless of who is saying it
>Okay, but why?
<Because I want there to be an Mlpol. I don't care for how many it is, I want it for ME. That others can enjoy the spoils is irrelevant.
<I didn't plan this, but you sealed the deal with your post against GR15DF. "Clippity Cloppity, get off my property". I thought you'd try to negotiate
>Fuck that nigger
<And that right there, is why
*unflashbacking sounds*
>He decided one day to take a users post and edit its contents to something along the lines of
Oh you want to go there? Hehe.
The user in question was Nigel. He was being a problem at the time, one to which I volunteered to address.
Now mind you, Nigel can be a bit much
<Says you
QUIET. During one of Nigel's particularly egregious sperg-sessions I made a comment in staff discord about it.
I was advised to either edit or delete the post.
By Lotus.
I did so (edit).
It was much later that Pupper lost his shit about it.
>I had my own problems with him
This entire paragraph is revisionist history
>He was purely vitriolic in every conversation in staff chat
Only to those who were being derelict
Remember the time Lotus changed my staff password because I stopped him from abusing >That Guy?
Pepperidge Farms remembers
>>10422
>I've been the heart and soul of this site from the beginning
Imagine being this narcissistic.
>I've been the heart and soul of this site from the beginning
Imagine being this narcissistic.
Remember when Atlas came back from getting robbed by niggers, and Lotus and I talked to him in voice chat? But then later, when notified that Atlas was 'back' Pupper refused to hear of it?
Remember how Ninjaz wrangled all of staff into a private DM and within SECONDS everyone was like "Yeah, it's authentically Atlas"? But Pupper was still so mad that he kicked him from any sort of administrative duties, and THAT'S why he left staff?
Surely you know who remembers.
Remember how Ninjaz wrangled all of staff into a private DM and within SECONDS everyone was like "Yeah, it's authentically Atlas"? But Pupper was still so mad that he kicked him from any sort of administrative duties, and THAT'S why he left staff?
Surely you know who remembers.
>>10410
>>10412
>>10413
We’ve been hearing your “””redress””” whether we want to or not through ban-evading posts, unsolicited discord messages, and false reports since early 2021. We’ve heard them. You have nothing to say. It’s always
>Disagreeing with me is gaslighting!
>this is revisionist history!
>you are lying/dishonest!
>what about that time lotus did a bad thing in 2018?
>what about that time I did a good thing back in 2017?
>I’m just going to ban evade anyways
I could go on about how this these are logical fallacies that avoid the point, but nevermind that.
Suppose it’s all true and this website has collectively perpetrated the greatest injustice in all of human history against you, worse than slavery, the six gorrillion, and all other evils combined. Why are you still here? Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you? Why don’t you go somewhere that doesn’t send you into a state of perpetual rage?
>>10418
> If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized
We don’t care “why” anymore. We’re exhausted with your perpetual rage and are ending it.
> with a z
No one cares what you want to call yourself
>>10420
I don’t mean to sound like I’m not sympathetic to those who suffer from mental health problems. I am.
I’m merely relating here that I don’t think that his behavior is from an adult who does not have some kind of mental abnormality, and that his behavior is exhausting whatever the cause.
>>10422
> Lotus and I go way back.
Correct, and this is why you’ve been given far more leniency than anyone else ever would.
> when I applied to staff, my position was unassailable
Correct. That’s why I advocated for you to be on staff, and why all of us were in such disbelief when you lost your mind.
> having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point
I’ve been personally paying for the site for four years now, Pupper paid for it for a year, and Elway paid for it for a year. Paying a few server fees doesn’t give you license to be vitriolic to everyone.
> Atlas almost gave the site to me.
Normally I’d say “bullshit, prove it” but you know what? I can almost believe it.
Atlas was and is good guy, both intelligent and likeable. But he has a sanguine personality type. He tries to avoid conflict, and he wants everyone to like him. He’s more concerned with making everyone happy that genuine solutions. And You will bully, threaten, and black mail people into doing what you want. I know you made it clear that you “must” give him admin role or else you’d leave, or what have you. But Atlas didn’t give the site to you, did he? Because he knew that would be a terrible idea. Instead, Atlas did what he usually tries to do, which is to find a solution he thought could be accepted by all parties. He actually gave the site to Pupper, because Pupper is so neutral and likeable that no one was going to say “no” to this. Then he had a spilt three-part system to attempt to simultaneously please both you and me. What should have been done was to remove you from staff as soon as you refused to communicate in the discord server.
> The user in question was Nigel.
Correct, and I mention that in my post. In fact, I mentioned that I actually was on your side in that whole argument. I’m not bringing the argument up because I think it’s so terrible that you edited a post. I’m bringing it up because your response to a policy disagreement with Pupper was to start a year long vendetta with him and declare him your arch enemy because he disagreed with something you did and wanted to place a limit on your behavior, rather than do the common sense thing and say “okay, going forward, no more edits.”
>everything is revisionist history
I have screencaps, you don’t. No I don’t care to post them, because I know no one thinks your claim is credible.
> Only to those who were being derelict
You don’t have a right to be vitriolic to everyone who disagrees with you.
>>10425
Are you seriously making a big deal of Pupper briefly being suspicious that Atlas, coming back on a completely new discord user account after an 8 month hiatus, was actually Atlas? I didn’t remember that until you brought it up. It doesn’t justify you being an ass in the present.
>>10412
>>10413
We’ve been hearing your “””redress””” whether we want to or not through ban-evading posts, unsolicited discord messages, and false reports since early 2021. We’ve heard them. You have nothing to say. It’s always
>Disagreeing with me is gaslighting!
>this is revisionist history!
>you are lying/dishonest!
>what about that time lotus did a bad thing in 2018?
>what about that time I did a good thing back in 2017?
>I’m just going to ban evade anyways
I could go on about how this these are logical fallacies that avoid the point, but nevermind that.
Suppose it’s all true and this website has collectively perpetrated the greatest injustice in all of human history against you, worse than slavery, the six gorrillion, and all other evils combined. Why are you still here? Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you? Why don’t you go somewhere that doesn’t send you into a state of perpetual rage?
>>10418
> If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized
We don’t care “why” anymore. We’re exhausted with your perpetual rage and are ending it.
> with a z
No one cares what you want to call yourself
>>10420
I don’t mean to sound like I’m not sympathetic to those who suffer from mental health problems. I am.
I’m merely relating here that I don’t think that his behavior is from an adult who does not have some kind of mental abnormality, and that his behavior is exhausting whatever the cause.
>>10422
> Lotus and I go way back.
Correct, and this is why you’ve been given far more leniency than anyone else ever would.
> when I applied to staff, my position was unassailable
Correct. That’s why I advocated for you to be on staff, and why all of us were in such disbelief when you lost your mind.
> having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point
I’ve been personally paying for the site for four years now, Pupper paid for it for a year, and Elway paid for it for a year. Paying a few server fees doesn’t give you license to be vitriolic to everyone.
> Atlas almost gave the site to me.
Normally I’d say “bullshit, prove it” but you know what? I can almost believe it.
Atlas was and is good guy, both intelligent and likeable. But he has a sanguine personality type. He tries to avoid conflict, and he wants everyone to like him. He’s more concerned with making everyone happy that genuine solutions. And You will bully, threaten, and black mail people into doing what you want. I know you made it clear that you “must” give him admin role or else you’d leave, or what have you. But Atlas didn’t give the site to you, did he? Because he knew that would be a terrible idea. Instead, Atlas did what he usually tries to do, which is to find a solution he thought could be accepted by all parties. He actually gave the site to Pupper, because Pupper is so neutral and likeable that no one was going to say “no” to this. Then he had a spilt three-part system to attempt to simultaneously please both you and me. What should have been done was to remove you from staff as soon as you refused to communicate in the discord server.
> The user in question was Nigel.
Correct, and I mention that in my post. In fact, I mentioned that I actually was on your side in that whole argument. I’m not bringing the argument up because I think it’s so terrible that you edited a post. I’m bringing it up because your response to a policy disagreement with Pupper was to start a year long vendetta with him and declare him your arch enemy because he disagreed with something you did and wanted to place a limit on your behavior, rather than do the common sense thing and say “okay, going forward, no more edits.”
>everything is revisionist history
I have screencaps, you don’t. No I don’t care to post them, because I know no one thinks your claim is credible.
> Only to those who were being derelict
You don’t have a right to be vitriolic to everyone who disagrees with you.
>>10425
Are you seriously making a big deal of Pupper briefly being suspicious that Atlas, coming back on a completely new discord user account after an 8 month hiatus, was actually Atlas? I didn’t remember that until you brought it up. It doesn’t justify you being an ass in the present.
>>10422
This site should be for all of those who want it to be a fun place. The heart and soul of mlpol is the users. Not any one particular user. And I will tell you again. Blue lotus extract can be used to treat what you have. You can find it cheap at smoke shops. You don't even need to see a doctor. And cut the blackmail crap. Blackmail is a felony.
This site should be for all of those who want it to be a fun place. The heart and soul of mlpol is the users. Not any one particular user. And I will tell you again. Blue lotus extract can be used to treat what you have. You can find it cheap at smoke shops. You don't even need to see a doctor. And cut the blackmail crap. Blackmail is a felony.
>>10415
So let’s imagine for a minute that that makes killing two dogs not a felony and completely excusable. It doesn’t, though it certainly makes it understandable.
Why, oh why, oh why for the love of God is this information so important that you need to cryptically hint about it in a report, then talk about it in the cytube at movie night, then spam it on /1ntr/, then on /sp/, then here on /qa/? Why is this so important for strangers on the internet to know that you have to ban evade to say it? I’ve had my own personal matters very recently that I would genuinely hold out to be worse than losing a pet of 18 years, and I don’t talk about it on the board or with people I don’t know very well.
Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
I’m keeping your posts bragging about killing dogs up so that way other users see them and can see what kind of person you are.
So let’s imagine for a minute that that makes killing two dogs not a felony and completely excusable. It doesn’t, though it certainly makes it understandable.
Why, oh why, oh why for the love of God is this information so important that you need to cryptically hint about it in a report, then talk about it in the cytube at movie night, then spam it on /1ntr/, then on /sp/, then here on /qa/? Why is this so important for strangers on the internet to know that you have to ban evade to say it? I’ve had my own personal matters very recently that I would genuinely hold out to be worse than losing a pet of 18 years, and I don’t talk about it on the board or with people I don’t know very well.
Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
I’m keeping your posts bragging about killing dogs up so that way other users see them and can see what kind of person you are.
>>10428
Blackmail and doxxing threats.
It's really annoying to know that all the time I wasted trying to get to know this guy and keep a relationship going with him culminated in him leveraging it to harass and threaten my friends over petty squabbles. He's an untrustworthy loser, and he continues to spam and posture because he can't accept that he might be wrong for once.
>>10427
>Why are you still here? Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you? Why don’t you go somewhere that doesn’t send you into a state of perpetual rage?
Probably a combination of sunk cost fallacy, spite, autistic fixation, schizophrenic delusion, and psychotic obsession.
It's actually pathetic.
>>10429
>Why, oh why, oh why for the love of God is this information so important that you need to cryptically hint about it in a report, then talk about it in the cytube at movie night, then spam it on /1ntr/, then on /sp/, then here on /qa/? Why is this so important for strangers on the internet to know that you have to ban evade to say it? I’ve had my own personal matters very recently that I would genuinely hold out to be worse than losing a pet of 18 years, and I don’t talk about it on the board or with people I don’t know very well.
Probably because he's emotionally unstable, but still wants to brag about it so that he can come off as edgy or "hardboiled", when in reality it just makes him too lame and psychotic.
It's not the first time he's done this, but the first time it involved a dog in my recollection.
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
Yeah, he had a pattern of sending vague threats to me on discord until I eventually blocked him, and then he proceeded to try to do the same thing on site. It must be really annoying for him to send you that bullshit by abusing the reporting system.
Blackmail and doxxing threats.
It's really annoying to know that all the time I wasted trying to get to know this guy and keep a relationship going with him culminated in him leveraging it to harass and threaten my friends over petty squabbles. He's an untrustworthy loser, and he continues to spam and posture because he can't accept that he might be wrong for once.
>>10427
>Why are you still here? Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you? Why don’t you go somewhere that doesn’t send you into a state of perpetual rage?
Probably a combination of sunk cost fallacy, spite, autistic fixation, schizophrenic delusion, and psychotic obsession.
It's actually pathetic.
>>10429
>Why, oh why, oh why for the love of God is this information so important that you need to cryptically hint about it in a report, then talk about it in the cytube at movie night, then spam it on /1ntr/, then on /sp/, then here on /qa/? Why is this so important for strangers on the internet to know that you have to ban evade to say it? I’ve had my own personal matters very recently that I would genuinely hold out to be worse than losing a pet of 18 years, and I don’t talk about it on the board or with people I don’t know very well.
Probably because he's emotionally unstable, but still wants to brag about it so that he can come off as edgy or "hardboiled", when in reality it just makes him too lame and psychotic.
It's not the first time he's done this, but the first time it involved a dog in my recollection.
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
Yeah, he had a pattern of sending vague threats to me on discord until I eventually blocked him, and then he proceeded to try to do the same thing on site. It must be really annoying for him to send you that bullshit by abusing the reporting system.
>>10429
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about?
Tbh, you might want to consider getting law enforcement involved there. A threat is still a threat, even if its said in a vague and cryptic way. Screenshot everything and archive it so that he can be prosecuted.
Iirc, he's already a felon, so the justice system won't treat him well if you have evidence of death threats.
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about?
Tbh, you might want to consider getting law enforcement involved there. A threat is still a threat, even if its said in a vague and cryptic way. Screenshot everything and archive it so that he can be prosecuted.
Iirc, he's already a felon, so the justice system won't treat him well if you have evidence of death threats.
Back to the original topic though. /vint/ /x/ and /ko/ sound good to everyone?
>>10435
I would prefer /kx/, /vint/, and maybe roleplay (/qst/, /tg/, "horseplay" /hp/). Roleplay is a topic large enough to have its own board, and most other pony altchans have one.
I don't really have very much to contribute on the topic of cars ,and I might still be salty over /pol/-tan taking /o/-tan to the ball instead of /mlp/.
I would prefer /kx/, /vint/, and maybe roleplay (/qst/, /tg/, "horseplay" /hp/). Roleplay is a topic large enough to have its own board, and most other pony altchans have one.
I don't really have very much to contribute on the topic of cars ,and I might still be salty over /pol/-tan taking /o/-tan to the ball instead of /mlp/.
I do want to stress that /vx/ should be renovated as soon as possible. The state of the board is poor, and it sabotages this site's potential to acquire new users from 4chan who are being bullied by jannies who don't want them to talk about collective shout. This site could be a hub for gamergate 3 if cards are played right, so it's important to have a proper board for video games.
Idk if we should even have /vint/, because the small size of this community means that posters with non-American flags are often easily identifiable and intimidated into silence. The non-political boards shouldn't have flags.
Idk if we should even have /vint/, because the small size of this community means that posters with non-American flags are often easily identifiable and intimidated into silence. The non-political boards shouldn't have flags.
>>10436
I can contribute to cars and I will say it again. Schizophrenia and guns shouldn't be mixed. Imagine if people like ninjaz were using that board.
I can contribute to cars and I will say it again. Schizophrenia and guns shouldn't be mixed. Imagine if people like ninjaz were using that board.
The site should be trying not only to appease old users, but to draw new users in.
>>10438
>Imagine if people like ninjaz were using that board.
Not having a board wouldn't make them go away.
I just find the concept entertaining. Still better than /vx/.
Roleplayers and occultists really don't mix at all. Roleplayers don't want to be mistaken for occultists 1980s Satanic Panic style, and occultists don't want to be mixed up unserious larpers. And meanwhile /v/ gets suffocated under both of those topics.
>>10439
>>10440
Exactly. We should accommodate that. If we do it well, we could be s popular altchan, and having an appropriate video games board is pivotal for that.
Tbh, /v/ could be a standalone board.
>Imagine if people like ninjaz were using that board.
Not having a board wouldn't make them go away.
I just find the concept entertaining. Still better than /vx/.
Roleplayers and occultists really don't mix at all. Roleplayers don't want to be mistaken for occultists 1980s Satanic Panic style, and occultists don't want to be mixed up unserious larpers. And meanwhile /v/ gets suffocated under both of those topics.
>>10439
>>10440
Exactly. We should accommodate that. If we do it well, we could be s popular altchan, and having an appropriate video games board is pivotal for that.
Tbh, /v/ could be a standalone board.
>>10441
>Not having a board wouldn't make them go away.
I just find the concept entertaining. Still better than /vx/.
Anything would be better than /vx/ at this point, but as was stated earlier this site could host something similar to gamer gate 3.0 if the cards are played right /vint/ would be perfect for that. I think /x/ should be stand alone with religious discussions also allowed. And I think we should avoid having the weapons board directly part of the schizo talk board. I think /ko/ would make a great board because a lot of the same masculine mechanical type minds would be both attracted to both guns and cars.
>Not having a board wouldn't make them go away.
I just find the concept entertaining. Still better than /vx/.
Anything would be better than /vx/ at this point, but as was stated earlier this site could host something similar to gamer gate 3.0 if the cards are played right /vint/ would be perfect for that. I think /x/ should be stand alone with religious discussions also allowed. And I think we should avoid having the weapons board directly part of the schizo talk board. I think /ko/ would make a great board because a lot of the same masculine mechanical type minds would be both attracted to both guns and cars.
>>10442
>as was stated earlier this site could host something similar to gamer gate 3.0 if the cards are played right /vint/ would be perfect for that
I was a proponent for /vint/ when I made this thread, but now I don't think so, just because the presence of flags has demonstrated to intimidate non-American posters.
>as was stated earlier this site could host something similar to gamer gate 3.0 if the cards are played right /vint/ would be perfect for that
I was a proponent for /vint/ when I made this thread, but now I don't think so, just because the presence of flags has demonstrated to intimidate non-American posters.
>We've been hearing your redress
Lol no, NO ONE has heard it because it's fucking tedious and lengthy! And that's because Lotus has avoided accountability (technically) since HE was kicked from staff!
>Why are you still here
"Why" is irrelevant.
>Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you
Surely you've noticed that the satisfaction of staff isn't a concern. It was, once
>are you making a big deal about Pupper being suspicious
That's not what Pupper said, he SAID "I don't give a fuck if it IS Atlas"
>So let’s imagine for a minute that that makes killing two dogs not a felony and completely excusable
You clearly don't live in Texas, livestock has more rights than humans
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
This is exactly the nancy-ass behavior I'm talking about. No it's not a fucking threat you mongoloid.
>bragging
Do you think I'm happy about the scenario? Hold on, do you think... yeah you probably do, nevermind.
>>10430
>Blackmail and doxxing threats
What blackmail? And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
>It's actually pathetic
Would it be less if I was ERPing with a dude?
Lol no, NO ONE has heard it because it's fucking tedious and lengthy! And that's because Lotus has avoided accountability (technically) since HE was kicked from staff!
>Why are you still here
"Why" is irrelevant.
>Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you
Surely you've noticed that the satisfaction of staff isn't a concern. It was, once
>are you making a big deal about Pupper being suspicious
That's not what Pupper said, he SAID "I don't give a fuck if it IS Atlas"
>So let’s imagine for a minute that that makes killing two dogs not a felony and completely excusable
You clearly don't live in Texas, livestock has more rights than humans
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
This is exactly the nancy-ass behavior I'm talking about. No it's not a fucking threat you mongoloid.
>bragging
Do you think I'm happy about the scenario? Hold on, do you think... yeah you probably do, nevermind.
>>10430
>Blackmail and doxxing threats
What blackmail? And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
>It's actually pathetic
Would it be less if I was ERPing with a dude?
Anonymous
No.10446
Apparently this needs to be said:
I'm not hostile to anyone nor will engage in hostility toward any person, individuals, etc.
I have alot of practice at fighting and grappling, and since I'm not working I have been getting back into the swing of things, so yes I could choke (you) or whoever out, before you were able to draw a firearm since you're making Marefair about that for some reason.
I WON'T, that's what on the internet we call "Conjecture" (sometimes known as shitposting), so calm your tits.
I'm not hostile to anyone nor will engage in hostility toward any person, individuals, etc.
I have alot of practice at fighting and grappling, and since I'm not working I have been getting back into the swing of things, so yes I could choke (you) or whoever out, before you were able to draw a firearm since you're making Marefair about that for some reason.
I WON'T, that's what on the internet we call "Conjecture" (sometimes known as shitposting), so calm your tits.
>>10444
>And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
That is still blackmail dude. You need to cut the shit.
>And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
That is still blackmail dude. You need to cut the shit.
>>10447
Need is a strong word, for one. For two, I'm not the one who can't follow through with an agreement
Need is a strong word, for one. For two, I'm not the one who can't follow through with an agreement
Ribozyme
No.10449
>>10448
Yes need. That behavior is going to get you arrested. A judge will see it and you're already in the system. What do you think a jury will say? I'm going to say this again. Go look into blue lotus extract to calm your ass down.
Yes need. That behavior is going to get you arrested. A judge will see it and you're already in the system. What do you think a jury will say? I'm going to say this again. Go look into blue lotus extract to calm your ass down.
>>10450
Blackmail is a federal crime you can do serious time for that. "Making someone think there is a credible threat" is a credible threat. It's a felony so cut the shit.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/873
Blackmail is a federal crime you can do serious time for that. "Making someone think there is a credible threat" is a credible threat. It's a felony so cut the shit.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/873
Anonymous
No.10452
Anonymous
No.10453
>>10444
>"Why" is irrelevant.
Enlighten us then.
>Surely you've noticed that the satisfaction of staff isn't a concern. It was, once
Your actions don't just affect the staff, but also the other users. Everyone is tired of your spam.
>No it's not a fucking threat
It sounds like a threat at face value. Learn to communicate.
>And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
First of all, that's a lie and you know it.
Second of all, a threat is a threat.
Holding up an old alarm clock and saying it's a bomb is still a bomb threat, regardless of if you actually had a bomb. Same goes for any other kind of threat.
You threaten people, and now you are scorned. Nobody trusts you anymore. Nobody wants to interact with you because you have demonstrated that you are not fit for civilized society.
>I'm not hostile to anyone nor will engage in hostility toward any person, individuals, etc.
Spamming, harassment, and threats are all hostile behavior. Your actions speak louder than words.
>since I'm not working
Get a job, nigger.
>so yes I could choke (you) or whoever out, before you were able to draw a firearm since you're making Marefair about that for some reason.
You say that, and then you wonder why you are not welcome here.
>I WON'T, that's what on the internet we call "Conjecture" (sometimes known as shitposting), so calm your tits.
That kind of faggot logic doesn't hold up in court, and it won't hold up here.
>>10447
This.
>>10450
Possibly, yes. I hope they throw the book at you.
>>10451
Not to mention the choking thing, which is also a federal crime.
Plus it fits the definition of criminal harassment under Texas Penal Code § 42.07, so that's a state charge.
He really should be reported to the police for this bullshit. I've had enough of this faggot.
>"Why" is irrelevant.
Enlighten us then.
>Surely you've noticed that the satisfaction of staff isn't a concern. It was, once
Your actions don't just affect the staff, but also the other users. Everyone is tired of your spam.
>No it's not a fucking threat
It sounds like a threat at face value. Learn to communicate.
>And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
First of all, that's a lie and you know it.
Second of all, a threat is a threat.
Holding up an old alarm clock and saying it's a bomb is still a bomb threat, regardless of if you actually had a bomb. Same goes for any other kind of threat.
You threaten people, and now you are scorned. Nobody trusts you anymore. Nobody wants to interact with you because you have demonstrated that you are not fit for civilized society.
>I'm not hostile to anyone nor will engage in hostility toward any person, individuals, etc.
Spamming, harassment, and threats are all hostile behavior. Your actions speak louder than words.
>since I'm not working
Get a job, nigger.
>so yes I could choke (you) or whoever out, before you were able to draw a firearm since you're making Marefair about that for some reason.
You say that, and then you wonder why you are not welcome here.
>I WON'T, that's what on the internet we call "Conjecture" (sometimes known as shitposting), so calm your tits.
That kind of faggot logic doesn't hold up in court, and it won't hold up here.
>>10447
This.
>>10450
Possibly, yes. I hope they throw the book at you.
>>10451
Not to mention the choking thing, which is also a federal crime.
Plus it fits the definition of criminal harassment under Texas Penal Code § 42.07, so that's a state charge.
He really should be reported to the police for this bullshit. I've had enough of this faggot.
Mods, please screencap and archive these posts as evidence before you delete them. I can't because I'm on mobile.
Anonymous
No.10455
1754848467.jpg (180.3 KB, 1080x426, Screenshot_20250810_125355_Brave.jpg)
>Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Oh right, cuz you're gonna drag my ass to court because I rustled your jimmies on the internet. Do your worst, and make sure to point to where on the doll I hurt your feelings.
Oh right, cuz you're gonna drag my ass to court because I rustled your jimmies on the internet. Do your worst, and make sure to point to where on the doll I hurt your feelings.
>>10456
People are talking about dragging you to court because you are trying to blackmail and extort your way into a moderation position.
People are talking about dragging you to court because you are trying to blackmail and extort your way into a moderation position.
Anonymous
No.10458
>>10457
Even if he weren't trying to be a mod, his pattern of illegal threats and harassment cannot be allowed to continue. I would even testify against him.
Even if he weren't trying to be a mod, his pattern of illegal threats and harassment cannot be allowed to continue. I would even testify against him.
>>10457
This is just insane. Like, if you have any illusions about me wanting to be on staff, let me disabuse you of them now. I HAVE made jokes about how staff is incompetent and actually be alot more effective if I was back on, but no there's neither aspiration nor incentive.
Either I shitpost too hard, or some of y'all are really not good at this
This is just insane. Like, if you have any illusions about me wanting to be on staff, let me disabuse you of them now. I HAVE made jokes about how staff is incompetent and actually be alot more effective if I was back on, but no there's neither aspiration nor incentive.
Either I shitpost too hard, or some of y'all are really not good at this
To the ban evading nigass - you’re still perma-banned, your few posts have only been suffered to exist because I wanted users who don’t already know you to understand what an unsufferable cunt you are, and also for the 1 in one billion chance that maybe, just maybe, something could get through to you.
>>10456
Cruelty to non-livestock animals, as well as Deadly-Conduct - discharge of firearm, are both State Jail Felonies in (You)r jurisdiction. Felon in Possession of firearm is probably legal under the circumstances, but trying to take firearms to Mare Fair is felonious under Texas, Florida, and Federal law, and I promise you I will see to it that that one is enforced.
Threats of violence are a Class B misdemeanor. Don’t worry, I’m working on it.
>>10454
It saves in the system, don’t worry.
>>10456
Cruelty to non-livestock animals, as well as Deadly-Conduct - discharge of firearm, are both State Jail Felonies in (You)r jurisdiction. Felon in Possession of firearm is probably legal under the circumstances, but trying to take firearms to Mare Fair is felonious under Texas, Florida, and Federal law, and I promise you I will see to it that that one is enforced.
Threats of violence are a Class B misdemeanor. Don’t worry, I’m working on it.
>>10454
It saves in the system, don’t worry.
i am just imagining that in a court , trying to explaining it to the judge that how in a Pony Nazi site someone was blackmailing people...
are you guys talking about real court right?
are you guys talking about real court right?
>>10466
yeah i read what lotus wrote , ningas sound like a very horrible person
i agree with the suing him
yeah i read what lotus wrote , ningas sound like a very horrible person
i agree with the suing him
>>10459
Kill yourself, you degenerate criminal.
>>10461
>It saves in the system, don’t worry.
Huh, really? Are all deleted posts archived?
That makes me a bit uncomfortable, for other reasons...
>>10462
What else should we do if he goes around threatening people? Criminal content is not allowed.
>>10466
This.
Banning him apparently wasn't enough.
Kill yourself, you degenerate criminal.
>>10461
>It saves in the system, don’t worry.
Huh, really? Are all deleted posts archived?
That makes me a bit uncomfortable, for other reasons...
>>10462
What else should we do if he goes around threatening people? Criminal content is not allowed.
>>10466
This.
Banning him apparently wasn't enough.
>>10468
>What else should we do if he goes around threatening people? Criminal content is not allowed.
well i hope being a nazi is not illegal in america
because that would have a negative effect on judge's judgement tho
but if you guys have strong evidence against him , then definitely sue his ass
>What else should we do if he goes around threatening people? Criminal content is not allowed.
well i hope being a nazi is not illegal in america
because that would have a negative effect on judge's judgement tho
but if you guys have strong evidence against him , then definitely sue his ass
>>10469
Sueing could be a good idea. A civil case would hold him accountable and would force him to cut the shit.
Sueing could be a good idea. A civil case would hold him accountable and would force him to cut the shit.
Anonymous
No.10471
>>10469
>i hope being a nazi is not illegal in america
It is not.
>strong evidence against him
I have a background in forensics. If he's going to play this game, I won't hold back.
>i hope being a nazi is not illegal in america
It is not.
>strong evidence against him
I have a background in forensics. If he's going to play this game, I won't hold back.
also wtf was about that dog killing and animal abuse?
i hope that was just bluffing
i hope that was just bluffing
>>10473
>Probably thinks it makes him sound tough.
yeah . no , it doesn't like at all , it just make him sound like an edgy teenager with parental issues who talks about satanism and sends gore videos in discord
>Probably thinks it makes him sound tough.
yeah . no , it doesn't like at all , it just make him sound like an edgy teenager with parental issues who talks about satanism and sends gore videos in discord
>>10474
I am convinced that his brain completely stopped growing at 13. His mental state comes off as stunted and immature despite his age. He's touched in the head.
I am convinced that his brain completely stopped growing at 13. His mental state comes off as stunted and immature despite his age. He's touched in the head.
>>10475
>I am convinced that his brain completely stopped growing at 13. His mental state comes off as stunted and immature despite his age
eh being on 4chan for a long time , seeing someone like him is not rare
anyway i will not interrupt this thread no more
>I am convinced that his brain completely stopped growing at 13. His mental state comes off as stunted and immature despite his age
eh being on 4chan for a long time , seeing someone like him is not rare
anyway i will not interrupt this thread no more
Anonymous
No.10477
>>10476
>anyway i will not interrupt this thread no more
It's already derailed at this point. I might make another one later.
>anyway i will not interrupt this thread no more
It's already derailed at this point. I might make another one later.
>>10468
>That makes me a bit uncomfortable, for other reasons...
Deleted images are not saved, and we did fix that
>>10472
It was not. Two stray dogs killed his 18-year-old cat, so he shot and killed both dogs with firearms nominally in his roommate's name and then buried them in his yard. He has gone way out of his way to make sure everyone here knows this story.
>>10466
>>10467
>>10470
My day job is in the criminal justice system, so I will ask around about what options are possible.
>>10478
It's a State Jail Felony. Two Counts.
>That makes me a bit uncomfortable, for other reasons...
Deleted images are not saved, and we did fix that
>>10472
It was not. Two stray dogs killed his 18-year-old cat, so he shot and killed both dogs with firearms nominally in his roommate's name and then buried them in his yard. He has gone way out of his way to make sure everyone here knows this story.
>>10466
>>10467
>>10470
My day job is in the criminal justice system, so I will ask around about what options are possible.
>>10478
It's a State Jail Felony. Two Counts.
>>10481
what a comeback
this is getting really childish
--
why are you guys randomly banned me for?
what a comeback
this is getting really childish
--
why are you guys randomly banned me for?
>>10478
>No, that was legitimate
Nobody cares about your unsolicited dog-killing stories. You have no reason to share that at all, let alone spam it repeatedly across boards. Your performative edginess is pathetic.
>>10479
>Deleted images are not saved, and we did fix that
That's better, although the text of certain posts sometimes contains personal data that is better off deleted. That's a topic for another thread though.
>He has gone way out of his way to make sure everyone here knows this story.
See, this is the stupid part. Why would he flaunt something like that? Why share it at all?
I've dealt with animals all my life, but putting an animal down is not something I ever felt the need to broadcast across platforms. This faggot is an attention-seeking edgelord.
>so I will ask around about what options are possible.
Thankyou. I know that doing this is very stressful and tiresome, so I want you to know I appreciate that you are taking this matter seriously.
>>10483
Looks like you got caught in the crossfire. Yet another way this ban-evading faggot's behavior has been a detriment to the site.
>No, that was legitimate
Nobody cares about your unsolicited dog-killing stories. You have no reason to share that at all, let alone spam it repeatedly across boards. Your performative edginess is pathetic.
>>10479
>Deleted images are not saved, and we did fix that
That's better, although the text of certain posts sometimes contains personal data that is better off deleted. That's a topic for another thread though.
>He has gone way out of his way to make sure everyone here knows this story.
See, this is the stupid part. Why would he flaunt something like that? Why share it at all?
I've dealt with animals all my life, but putting an animal down is not something I ever felt the need to broadcast across platforms. This faggot is an attention-seeking edgelord.
>so I will ask around about what options are possible.
Thankyou. I know that doing this is very stressful and tiresome, so I want you to know I appreciate that you are taking this matter seriously.
>>10483
Looks like you got caught in the crossfire. Yet another way this ban-evading faggot's behavior has been a detriment to the site.
Anonymous
No.10485
>>10484
>Looks like you got caught in the crossfire. Yet another way this ban-evading faggot's behavior has been a detriment to the site.
eh no heart feeling
i just wait for my appeal
>Looks like you got caught in the crossfire. Yet another way this ban-evading faggot's behavior has been a detriment to the site.
eh no heart feeling
i just wait for my appeal
What a garbage person. Pathetic, petty, obsessive, unemployed, untrustworthy, spiteful, and most of all annoying. One of the biggest degenerates I've had the misfortune of knowing.
Anonymous
No.10490
>>10478
I can confirm he cares for animals.
I can confirm he cares for animals.
Anonymous
No.10491
>>10479
Keep the "settle out of court" option on the table. He might just co-operate, but he needs to face some consequences so this shit doesn't happen again.
Keep the "settle out of court" option on the table. He might just co-operate, but he needs to face some consequences so this shit doesn't happen again.
Anonymous
No.10495
blackmailing , harassment , constant threatening , online bullying etc
these are strong and dangerous illegal behaviours
it is not in his favour
these are strong and dangerous illegal behaviours
it is not in his favour
>>10443
>presence of flags has demonstrated to intimidate non-American posters.
Am bong, I don't get intimidated.
>presence of flags has demonstrated to intimidate non-American posters.
Am bong, I don't get intimidated.
>>10501
Yeah, but other posters do.
Mkogwheel used to post here back in 2017-2018, but it was obvious that it was him because there aren't any other New Zealand posters. That led to people harassing him off-site for drawing Fireaxe.
Yeah, but other posters do.
Mkogwheel used to post here back in 2017-2018, but it was obvious that it was him because there aren't any other New Zealand posters. That led to people harassing him off-site for drawing Fireaxe.
Anonymous
No.10509
>>10498
I've only been on this site a short time compared to the rest of you, but even I can spot a LARPing asshole such as yourself a mile off.
>I killed two dogs!
Well done? That makes you no different from an American cop.
>I can fight!
Anyone that can actually fight, doesn't say that.
>You're all being mean to me!
From my perspective, entirely justified, even without a true understanding of past events. Every thread you've interacted with, that I have observed, you ALWAYS come across as a cunt.
There's shitposting, and then there's being a cunt. The subtle difference.
>>10507
That's a shame. I like Kiwi, good lads. I haven't seen many bong posters here, other than during the 4chan hack.
I've only been on this site a short time compared to the rest of you, but even I can spot a LARPing asshole such as yourself a mile off.
>I killed two dogs!
Well done? That makes you no different from an American cop.
>I can fight!
Anyone that can actually fight, doesn't say that.
>You're all being mean to me!
From my perspective, entirely justified, even without a true understanding of past events. Every thread you've interacted with, that I have observed, you ALWAYS come across as a cunt.
There's shitposting, and then there's being a cunt. The subtle difference.
>>10507
That's a shame. I like Kiwi, good lads. I haven't seen many bong posters here, other than during the 4chan hack.
>>10417
We all are.
>>10418
>Huh, suddenly no one is feeling chatty
Tends to happen after people go to bed. Not everyone wants to stay up all night arguing with you, although Lord knows I've done it enough times.
>If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized, shall I direct the audience to the hidden place?
As usual, nobody but you has any idea what you're hinting at. I don't know what "the hidden place" is supposed to mean. Are you talking about the Hidden Valley? Because they have pretty good salad dressing from the stories I've heard. In any event, >>10427 hits the nail pretty squarely on the head; nobody here gives a rat's ass what your actual problem is anymore, we just want you to stop being a pain. If you can't do that, we'd appreciate it if you would just leave. If you refuse to do either, then there's not much we can do about it besides deleting your posts and banning your proxies, but we will continue to do that for as long as it takes. This is the path you chose, and you have no one to blame but yourself.
>It's Ninjaz, with a z, now, please and thank you.
Fine. In that case, my name is now Zhohn Ellwaye, with a Zh, two Ls, an E, and thousands of additional silent letters that cannot be rendered in the visible spectrum. I also have an imaginary talking cow living in my brain because I'm crazy as hell.
>As to the rest, yes. When I know I'm right and the people I'm arguing with are either A. wrong or B. lazy and stupid, I won't let things go. You don't get to slap me across the face a half-dozen times and are forgiven cuz that's what Jesus would want.
Thank you, this pretty much validates everything I said above. I appreciate you saving me the trouble of typing it all out again. While we're on the subject, let's take a look at some of the obviously quite important issues you've raised over the years, and were clearly in the right about:
<oh no, I was banned for being an asshole; I am mad
<oh no, I was banned again for ban evasion; I am mad
<oh no, my ban-evading posts were deleted because that's what happens to ban-evading posts; let me screencap them and repost them because I am mad
<oh no, my screencaps of my deleted ban-evading posts were themselves deleted because I am still banned and my reposts of banned posts are themselves banworthy; I shall now file 29 pissy appeals about it because I am mad
<oh no, my admin credentials were revoked because I antagonized and berated the person who has the power to revoke them enough times that he actually revoked them; I am mad
<oh no, the guy who blocks out 4 hours of his life once per week to stream free entertainment for everyone is streaming something that I, personally, do not care for; I am mad
<oh no, Patrick Stewart had hair in the 1970s and was cast in roles besides that of Jean Luc Picard; for reasons that no living person on earth besides me could possibly understand, this makes me mad
...and so on. Clearly these are serious issues that merit everyone's full and complete attention.
>Worse, I know how to be here forever, and yes I DO have the time and the wherewithall.
Unfortunately, no one doubts or contests this.
>And yes, when you're being derelict at your job which only amounts to monitoring an anonymous board, I will berate you, however I have to.
This "job" is a volunteer position. Most of us have actual shit going on in our actual lives, and don't have the luxury of sitting in front of a computer 24/7, so we moderate the site as best we can, when and if we have the time. You're welcome.
>>10422
>my position was unassailable, having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point, without recognition.
You bring this up a lot, and talk about it as though you fought in the Battle of the Bulge or something and deserve eternal recognition for it. As >>10427 points out, everyone currently on staff has chipped in for hosting fees at one time or another. I myself paid it for a year once. We're not even talking about huge sums of money here; our hosting fees cost about as much as a gym membership. Depending on an individual's situation it may or may not be a lot to pay up front, but in the grand scheme of things it's not a huge sacrifice. If you think that writing a couple of small checks back in the old days somehow balances out all of the insane shit you've pulled since then, you're even crazier than I thought.
>It's almost like you felt that monitoring the site was a privilege and not a duty.
It's neither. It's a volunteer position that could be done by literally anyone, the people on staff are just the ones who volunteered. The site doesn't even require that much moderation to begin with, it's basically just a matter of cleaning up spam when it appears and dealing with the occasional problem user. Now that you're no longer on staff, it's actually a much easier job, btw. The tripartite admin system we tried was stupid and unnecessary; turns out that "not having Ninjaz on staff at all" is a much easier solution. Since you've been gone, there's been basically no infighting or drama. What few disagreements do pop up are settled quickly and calmly.
>>10444
>What blackmail? And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
>No it's not a fucking threat you mongoloid.
The problem is that nobody can tell what's serious and what's hyperbole with you, because most of the time you make no sense and come across as an unhinged, potentially dangerous lunatic. As I understand it, whether or not a threat can be legally treated as serious hinges on whether the person is capable of carrying it out. When you're hinting at actual violent actions taking place at a real event that both you and the person you're yelling at are planning to attend, it's a bit more serious than just two anons in different states talking about bitch-slapping each other from behind computer screens.
We all are.
>>10418
>Huh, suddenly no one is feeling chatty
Tends to happen after people go to bed. Not everyone wants to stay up all night arguing with you, although Lord knows I've done it enough times.
>If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized, shall I direct the audience to the hidden place?
As usual, nobody but you has any idea what you're hinting at. I don't know what "the hidden place" is supposed to mean. Are you talking about the Hidden Valley? Because they have pretty good salad dressing from the stories I've heard. In any event, >>10427 hits the nail pretty squarely on the head; nobody here gives a rat's ass what your actual problem is anymore, we just want you to stop being a pain. If you can't do that, we'd appreciate it if you would just leave. If you refuse to do either, then there's not much we can do about it besides deleting your posts and banning your proxies, but we will continue to do that for as long as it takes. This is the path you chose, and you have no one to blame but yourself.
>It's Ninjaz, with a z, now, please and thank you.
Fine. In that case, my name is now Zhohn Ellwaye, with a Zh, two Ls, an E, and thousands of additional silent letters that cannot be rendered in the visible spectrum. I also have an imaginary talking cow living in my brain because I'm crazy as hell.
>As to the rest, yes. When I know I'm right and the people I'm arguing with are either A. wrong or B. lazy and stupid, I won't let things go. You don't get to slap me across the face a half-dozen times and are forgiven cuz that's what Jesus would want.
Thank you, this pretty much validates everything I said above. I appreciate you saving me the trouble of typing it all out again. While we're on the subject, let's take a look at some of the obviously quite important issues you've raised over the years, and were clearly in the right about:
<oh no, I was banned for being an asshole; I am mad
<oh no, I was banned again for ban evasion; I am mad
<oh no, my ban-evading posts were deleted because that's what happens to ban-evading posts; let me screencap them and repost them because I am mad
<oh no, my screencaps of my deleted ban-evading posts were themselves deleted because I am still banned and my reposts of banned posts are themselves banworthy; I shall now file 29 pissy appeals about it because I am mad
<oh no, my admin credentials were revoked because I antagonized and berated the person who has the power to revoke them enough times that he actually revoked them; I am mad
<oh no, the guy who blocks out 4 hours of his life once per week to stream free entertainment for everyone is streaming something that I, personally, do not care for; I am mad
<oh no, Patrick Stewart had hair in the 1970s and was cast in roles besides that of Jean Luc Picard; for reasons that no living person on earth besides me could possibly understand, this makes me mad
...and so on. Clearly these are serious issues that merit everyone's full and complete attention.
>Worse, I know how to be here forever, and yes I DO have the time and the wherewithall.
Unfortunately, no one doubts or contests this.
>And yes, when you're being derelict at your job which only amounts to monitoring an anonymous board, I will berate you, however I have to.
This "job" is a volunteer position. Most of us have actual shit going on in our actual lives, and don't have the luxury of sitting in front of a computer 24/7, so we moderate the site as best we can, when and if we have the time. You're welcome.
>>10422
>my position was unassailable, having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point, without recognition.
You bring this up a lot, and talk about it as though you fought in the Battle of the Bulge or something and deserve eternal recognition for it. As >>10427 points out, everyone currently on staff has chipped in for hosting fees at one time or another. I myself paid it for a year once. We're not even talking about huge sums of money here; our hosting fees cost about as much as a gym membership. Depending on an individual's situation it may or may not be a lot to pay up front, but in the grand scheme of things it's not a huge sacrifice. If you think that writing a couple of small checks back in the old days somehow balances out all of the insane shit you've pulled since then, you're even crazier than I thought.
>It's almost like you felt that monitoring the site was a privilege and not a duty.
It's neither. It's a volunteer position that could be done by literally anyone, the people on staff are just the ones who volunteered. The site doesn't even require that much moderation to begin with, it's basically just a matter of cleaning up spam when it appears and dealing with the occasional problem user. Now that you're no longer on staff, it's actually a much easier job, btw. The tripartite admin system we tried was stupid and unnecessary; turns out that "not having Ninjaz on staff at all" is a much easier solution. Since you've been gone, there's been basically no infighting or drama. What few disagreements do pop up are settled quickly and calmly.
>>10444
>What blackmail? And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
>No it's not a fucking threat you mongoloid.
The problem is that nobody can tell what's serious and what's hyperbole with you, because most of the time you make no sense and come across as an unhinged, potentially dangerous lunatic. As I understand it, whether or not a threat can be legally treated as serious hinges on whether the person is capable of carrying it out. When you're hinting at actual violent actions taking place at a real event that both you and the person you're yelling at are planning to attend, it's a bit more serious than just two anons in different states talking about bitch-slapping each other from behind computer screens.
Anonymous
No.10527
1754867166.gif (3.2 MB, 498x280, Shotgun to the head of a gormless cunt.gif)
Anonymous
No.10528
>>10515
>vid
as i said no hurt feeling
--
due respect ,idk why are you explaining all of that to me , i just wrote that as a way of saying unban me pwease , i was no looking for an answer , but still thanks for the unban
>Like, what exactly did you expect by posting a detractor post in a thread where a known ban evader is routinely posting his own detracting-posts?
i was just shitting on that guy for his edgelord bullshitism
it is not detracting when the person behaviour is obviously oblivious
>everyone knows who i am
i don't , unless you're lotus
>is Ni**** serious about killing dogs?
i don't understand the censoring of nigger but i hope he was not serious
--
anyway sorry if i was a bit unserious about all of this drama only because i am just an outsider , i am totally sure it has been painful for all of yall to dealing with all of this unwanted mind migraine, i just hate people who take themselves tooooooo seriously like ninja and boomer
life will be more peaceful if people just not trying to create random unnecessarily conflict/drama
>vid
as i said no hurt feeling
--
due respect ,idk why are you explaining all of that to me , i just wrote that as a way of saying unban me pwease , i was no looking for an answer , but still thanks for the unban
>Like, what exactly did you expect by posting a detractor post in a thread where a known ban evader is routinely posting his own detracting-posts?
i was just shitting on that guy for his edgelord bullshitism
it is not detracting when the person behaviour is obviously oblivious
>everyone knows who i am
i don't , unless you're lotus
>is Ni**** serious about killing dogs?
i don't understand the censoring of nigger but i hope he was not serious
--
anyway sorry if i was a bit unserious about all of this drama only because i am just an outsider , i am totally sure it has been painful for all of yall to dealing with all of this unwanted mind migraine, i just hate people who take themselves tooooooo seriously like ninja and boomer
life will be more peaceful if people just not trying to create random unnecessarily conflict/drama
Anonymous
No.10529
>>10515
okay i feel like an asshole , you wrote all of that and i don't know how respond...
sorry
okay i feel like an asshole , you wrote all of that and i don't know how respond...
sorry
>>10535
>disingenuous nigger
>your bullshit
>I btfo your position
Confrontational communication is fine for a while, but in your case is a constant and put anons off. You are going to get ignored even moar as any reasonable anon gets fatigued of your crap.
It looks like your problem is having too much time to waste. Get a job.
>disingenuous nigger
>your bullshit
>I btfo your position
Confrontational communication is fine for a while, but in your case is a constant and put anons off. You are going to get ignored even moar as any reasonable anon gets fatigued of your crap.
It looks like your problem is having too much time to waste. Get a job.
Anonymous
No.10539
>>10534
Your posts are being deleted because you are banned.
>>10535
>We'll get to the rest of your bullshit when I'm confident you aren't going to delete the part
That will never happen, because you are permanently banned.
>>10536
This.
Everypony is sick of him.
>>10537
>the bare minimum of what is expects
Bare minimum for moderation is to ban spammers like you.
>I'm a full-time NEET now.
Cool. So you're a loser AND a parasite.
Most people prefer to keep that to themselves.
>I'm disabled.
So am I. It doesn't stop me from being a productive member of society.
>I'm sure you will want to tell your friends and family. ^_^
You are not important. Nobody cares to tell your son story.
Your posts are being deleted because you are banned.
>>10535
>We'll get to the rest of your bullshit when I'm confident you aren't going to delete the part
That will never happen, because you are permanently banned.
>>10536
This.
Everypony is sick of him.
>>10537
>the bare minimum of what is expects
Bare minimum for moderation is to ban spammers like you.
>I'm a full-time NEET now.
Cool. So you're a loser AND a parasite.
Most people prefer to keep that to themselves.
>I'm disabled.
So am I. It doesn't stop me from being a productive member of society.
>I'm sure you will want to tell your friends and family. ^_^
You are not important. Nobody cares to tell your son story.
Anonymous
No.10541
>>10540
>No u!
If I spam, I will get banned. You are spamming now.
>Yes, you know all about everypony being sick of someone. Bet you're thrilled it's not you anymore. ^_~
Idk what this is even supposed to mean. You are delusional.
>If having spent 30 years carrying several businesses to the point of back-breaking is "a loser and a parasite"
Look where you ended up. Mentally ill, pathetic, and unable to even care for yourself. And on top of that you spend your free time spamming chansites. You are a living parody of a human being.
>No u!
If I spam, I will get banned. You are spamming now.
>Yes, you know all about everypony being sick of someone. Bet you're thrilled it's not you anymore. ^_~
Idk what this is even supposed to mean. You are delusional.
>If having spent 30 years carrying several businesses to the point of back-breaking is "a loser and a parasite"
Look where you ended up. Mentally ill, pathetic, and unable to even care for yourself. And on top of that you spend your free time spamming chansites. You are a living parody of a human being.
Anonymous
No.10543
>>10542
>protected
Ban evasion is not protected
>that's why you felt compelled to respond
This is rich coming from an unemployed faggot who does nothing but spam the site all day.
>insufferably malicious
What, did I hit a nerve? I'm simply describing what you are. I guess the truth hurts.
>I'm doing SOMETHING right
Your behavior has only gotten worse and worse over time. I wouldn't be surprised if you trooned out in the end.
>a tale of triumph
Ah, yes, an unemployed faggot who spends his days spamming an image board. The spitting image of triumph.
>My situation is permanent and hard-won.
You are unemployed.
Unless you raised an exorbitant amount of money in youth, it's safe to assume that you're a taxpayer-funded welfare baby that the government deemed to be too retarded to care for yourself, or you're living off of your family members
Parasite, either way.
>What have you earned?
I just finally pulled myself out of medical debt, and I'm getting a job in my field. I think I'm doing well.
>protected
Ban evasion is not protected
>that's why you felt compelled to respond
This is rich coming from an unemployed faggot who does nothing but spam the site all day.
>insufferably malicious
What, did I hit a nerve? I'm simply describing what you are. I guess the truth hurts.
>I'm doing SOMETHING right
Your behavior has only gotten worse and worse over time. I wouldn't be surprised if you trooned out in the end.
>a tale of triumph
Ah, yes, an unemployed faggot who spends his days spamming an image board. The spitting image of triumph.
>My situation is permanent and hard-won.
You are unemployed.
Unless you raised an exorbitant amount of money in youth, it's safe to assume that you're a taxpayer-funded welfare baby that the government deemed to be too retarded to care for yourself, or you're living off of your family members
Parasite, either way.
>What have you earned?
I just finally pulled myself out of medical debt, and I'm getting a job in my field. I think I'm doing well.
Anonymous
No.10545
>>10544
>BTW, the "sekret place" is /Test/
Okay. Go post there instead.
>BTW, the "sekret place" is /Test/
Okay. Go post there instead.
Anonymous
No.10548
>>10544
>For you ignoramuses in the audiences, this is an extended effort to convey contempt,
Get a boyfriend, or a dildo.
>For you ignoramuses in the audiences, this is an extended effort to convey contempt,
Get a boyfriend, or a dildo.
>>10544
Could some janny think of the poners and erase this post?
Ninjas is a saboteur now.
Could some janny think of the poners and erase this post?
Ninjas is a saboteur now.
Anonymous
No.10550
>>10549
This, please.
Jannies can go ahead and scrub my replies too. It was wrong of me to give him attention.
This, please.
Jannies can go ahead and scrub my replies too. It was wrong of me to give him attention.
Anonymous
No.10552
>>10551
Also this post.
Also this post.
>>(You)
>/Test/
Are you seriously still on about that? Yes, we have a test board. We've always had a /test/ board. Most sites have one, it's where you test things. 4chan has one, only theirs is private and you need mod credentials to log in to it. No, we've never listed our /test/ board publicly because why in the hell would we? You've gone off about this numerous times, and I've never understood your obsession the subject. You act like it's some huge secret we've been keeping.
So yes, for anyone who is interested in seeing a bunch meaningless posts staff have made testing various functions on the site, here is our super-sekrit hidden Test board:
https://mlpol.net/Test
>Much/most of this discussion could have occurred in my /sp/ thread by the way.
Do you mean the game thread you specifically asked me if you could start, and I said go ahead and start a game thread if you want, and then instead of starting a game thread, you kept on picking silly fights over silly bullshit in the old thread until you got yourself banned? Is that the thread you mean?
Anyway, whatever. Keep ban-evading, and we'll keep banning you and deleting your posts I guess. If this is how you choose to spend your time, there's not a whole lot anyone can do about it. I hope you're having fun.
>/Test/
Are you seriously still on about that? Yes, we have a test board. We've always had a /test/ board. Most sites have one, it's where you test things. 4chan has one, only theirs is private and you need mod credentials to log in to it. No, we've never listed our /test/ board publicly because why in the hell would we? You've gone off about this numerous times, and I've never understood your obsession the subject. You act like it's some huge secret we've been keeping.
So yes, for anyone who is interested in seeing a bunch meaningless posts staff have made testing various functions on the site, here is our super-sekrit hidden Test board:
https://mlpol.net/Test
>Much/most of this discussion could have occurred in my /sp/ thread by the way.
Do you mean the game thread you specifically asked me if you could start, and I said go ahead and start a game thread if you want, and then instead of starting a game thread, you kept on picking silly fights over silly bullshit in the old thread until you got yourself banned? Is that the thread you mean?
Anyway, whatever. Keep ban-evading, and we'll keep banning you and deleting your posts I guess. If this is how you choose to spend your time, there's not a whole lot anyone can do about it. I hope you're having fun.
>>10554
>sikrit board
to me it only seems like you guys had a secret vip party and had so much fun
--
also those spooder man memes are awesome
>sikrit board
to me it only seems like you guys had a secret vip party and had so much fun
--
also those spooder man memes are awesome
So normally my position is that we don't engage you and just delete everything you post because you have nothing of value to say, but I suppose some small part of me still feels like there's somehow something will get through.
You said something like "respond to false allegations." Nevermind the fact that they aren't false and you've had plenty of time to respond but haven't, you're really missing the point here.
We don't care what happened seven years ago. We don't care what happened four years or six years or whatever ago. This is all pixels on a screen. This isn't the real life. This is a place we go for decent experiences, but what happens here isn't so important that anything is worth holding grudges seven years after the fact. What we care about is what is happening now.
Do you think that if we were so offended with what happened years ago that we would have given you another chance last September, after you had already been banned off of the website? No. We want to move on with our lives and have a pleasant present.
Also, if you didn't know, Pupper has been away from his computer for months now. Even with that kind of restriction, Pupper has been able to add a quick-ban feature for Ban Evasion that lets us ban and delete posts in three clicks. And he'll be able to do much, much more than that to implement entirely new anti-spam features when he gets back in a week.
Good luck. Honestly, it's pretty fun to check mlpol, look for your posts, and delete them, and that's the most fun I've had with you in five years.
You said something like "respond to false allegations." Nevermind the fact that they aren't false and you've had plenty of time to respond but haven't, you're really missing the point here.
We don't care what happened seven years ago. We don't care what happened four years or six years or whatever ago. This is all pixels on a screen. This isn't the real life. This is a place we go for decent experiences, but what happens here isn't so important that anything is worth holding grudges seven years after the fact. What we care about is what is happening now.
Do you think that if we were so offended with what happened years ago that we would have given you another chance last September, after you had already been banned off of the website? No. We want to move on with our lives and have a pleasant present.
Also, if you didn't know, Pupper has been away from his computer for months now. Even with that kind of restriction, Pupper has been able to add a quick-ban feature for Ban Evasion that lets us ban and delete posts in three clicks. And he'll be able to do much, much more than that to implement entirely new anti-spam features when he gets back in a week.
Good luck. Honestly, it's pretty fun to check mlpol, look for your posts, and delete them, and that's the most fun I've had with you in five years.
Anonymous
No.10558
Anonymous
No.10559
>>10557
>This is all pixels on a screen. This isn't the real life.
some people don't have such virtues
>This is all pixels on a screen. This isn't the real life.
some people don't have such virtues
>>10554
>Is that the thread you mean?
I'm talking about the /sp/ thread with the cute pink scene-pony. The game thread became obviously untenable given the disposition of administration and their unwillingness to leave something they don't control alone to happen. I can explain what this means in detail, but you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline.
>I hope you're having fun
I am. It takes me very minimal effort to do this, so I will persist. I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days, but in order for that to happen certain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change. That, or the rules need to.
Seriously, it would be to your credit to make a rule "Don't make Lotus mad". As a new user, I would be impressed by such a rule. Whatever though.
>>10556
>you've had plenty of time to respond
Oh, is this a court of law where I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe? I thought you wanted me to leave. Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
This is the problem with Lotus. No matter what you do, he's going to frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
>we don't care what happened X years ago
No, you WANT people to not care because you know it invalidates your current position, because it paints you in as bad a light as I have painted myself.
Remember when you couldn't stop deleting and editing posts on the board AND the discord? To the point we had to make a second discord cuz you are an absolute control freak? Anyway,....
>that's the most fun I've had with you in five years.
And see, this right here is the one reason I haven't posted of. Because I know you enjoy it. I came back in September to make a number of apologies, a number of explanations, and to play games again with my friends.
One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person who simply would not let it stand that I was having fun and playing games with all the old crew and sought to sabotage my experience, and regrettably he was enabled to. So, I decided to play my own game. It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
>Is that the thread you mean?
I'm talking about the /sp/ thread with the cute pink scene-pony. The game thread became obviously untenable given the disposition of administration and their unwillingness to leave something they don't control alone to happen. I can explain what this means in detail, but you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline.
>I hope you're having fun
I am. It takes me very minimal effort to do this, so I will persist. I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days, but in order for that to happen certain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change. That, or the rules need to.
Seriously, it would be to your credit to make a rule "Don't make Lotus mad". As a new user, I would be impressed by such a rule. Whatever though.
>>10556
>you've had plenty of time to respond
Oh, is this a court of law where I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe? I thought you wanted me to leave. Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
This is the problem with Lotus. No matter what you do, he's going to frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
>we don't care what happened X years ago
No, you WANT people to not care because you know it invalidates your current position, because it paints you in as bad a light as I have painted myself.
Remember when you couldn't stop deleting and editing posts on the board AND the discord? To the point we had to make a second discord cuz you are an absolute control freak? Anyway,....
>that's the most fun I've had with you in five years.
And see, this right here is the one reason I haven't posted of. Because I know you enjoy it. I came back in September to make a number of apologies, a number of explanations, and to play games again with my friends.
One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person who simply would not let it stand that I was having fun and playing games with all the old crew and sought to sabotage my experience, and regrettably he was enabled to. So, I decided to play my own game. It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
>>10560
>you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline
We don't appreciate any of your posts, so decline those as well.
>I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days
You don't act like it. You only get worse overtime.
>what is permissible to post
You are banned for spamming, threats, derailment, harassment, and ban evasion. None of these things should be permissible.
And nobody cares enough about you to change the rules to make you more comfortable. You don't own this site. You are banned from this site.
>I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe?
You spend plenty of time posting anyway.
>I thought you wanted me to leave.
We do, leave.
>Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
We told you never to come back, not "take a break".
>frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
You are in the wrong.
You a a ban-evading, spamming, threatening, criminal, attention-seeking, terminally-online annoyance.
>when he knows he's wrong.
He is not wrong for banning you for the above reasons, and your subsequent behavior affirms that.
>No, you WANT people to not care
You are the only person who cares.
>with my friends
We are not friends. You burned every bridge long before that. You harassed, belittled, insulted and drove away everyone around you, to the point that nobody wants to interact with you.
>It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
Nobody appreciates it. Your effort is wasted.
But I guess a lowlife welfare parasite like you doesn't care about things like productivity, fulfillment or time management.
>you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline
We don't appreciate any of your posts, so decline those as well.
>I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days
You don't act like it. You only get worse overtime.
>what is permissible to post
You are banned for spamming, threats, derailment, harassment, and ban evasion. None of these things should be permissible.
And nobody cares enough about you to change the rules to make you more comfortable. You don't own this site. You are banned from this site.
>I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe?
You spend plenty of time posting anyway.
>I thought you wanted me to leave.
We do, leave.
>Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
We told you never to come back, not "take a break".
>frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
You are in the wrong.
You a a ban-evading, spamming, threatening, criminal, attention-seeking, terminally-online annoyance.
>when he knows he's wrong.
He is not wrong for banning you for the above reasons, and your subsequent behavior affirms that.
>No, you WANT people to not care
You are the only person who cares.
>with my friends
We are not friends. You burned every bridge long before that. You harassed, belittled, insulted and drove away everyone around you, to the point that nobody wants to interact with you.
>It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
Nobody appreciates it. Your effort is wasted.
But I guess a lowlife welfare parasite like you doesn't care about things like productivity, fulfillment or time management.
1755116992.png (1.5 MB, 1024x1024, d7c857c6-caa0-445a-a7df-c69c4061a2b4.png)
>>10562
>We don't appreciate any of your posts, so decline those as well.
That advice will do well, given my track-record of doing what (you) think I should. these fucking wankers
>You don't act like it. You only get worse overtime.
And you think I'm the only one? SON! Let me tell you!
>You are banned for spamming, threats, derailment, harassment, and ban evasion. None of these things should be permissible.
No, I was banned for not violating the rules. It was only after that that I decided "Oh, there's no actual rules? Well if there's no ACTUAL rules,...."
>And nobody cares enough about you to change the rules to make you more comfortable. You don't own this site. You are banned from this site.
A good thing I don't care if I'm banned or whatever then, isn't it. SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
>You spend plenty of time posting anyway.
Was that supposed to be a point? Objection, immaterial
>We do, leave.
Did you think of that, or was that just residual brain-washing?
>We told you never to come back, not "take a break".
Oh, it's "we" now? How cute. How things change.
>You are in the wrong.
Needs work. Practice it in the mirror before next time. Use a double-mirror (sometimes called a True mirror, where 2 mirrors are placed perpendicular so you can accurately observe your body-language)
>You are the only person who cares.
Clearly. The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me. Maybe that's a lesson you haven't learned with
>We are not friends. You burned every bridge long before that. You harassed, belittled, insulted and drove away everyone around you, to the point that nobody wants to interact with you.
I did. Long after Lotus, and (you) specifically did. Shall we go into the lengthy and drawn out dramas (plural) that you wrought because it was funny to you at the time?
>Nobody appreciates it. Your effort is wasted.
Well, you're talking to the wrong audience. ^_~
>But I guess a lowlife welfare parasite like you doesn't care about things like productivity, fulfillment or time management.
Ha! Rich and tasty! Alas, still lacking in an understanding of flavor-balance and control. Too much salt and acid, and not enough appreciation to the sweet, savory, and umami aspects. 4/10, not credible.
But seriously, if you wanna take shots at me at LEAST do it in the /sp/ thread. /qa/ has had enough of this
>We don't appreciate any of your posts, so decline those as well.
That advice will do well, given my track-record of doing what (you) think I should. these fucking wankers
>You don't act like it. You only get worse overtime.
And you think I'm the only one? SON! Let me tell you!
>You are banned for spamming, threats, derailment, harassment, and ban evasion. None of these things should be permissible.
No, I was banned for not violating the rules. It was only after that that I decided "Oh, there's no actual rules? Well if there's no ACTUAL rules,...."
>And nobody cares enough about you to change the rules to make you more comfortable. You don't own this site. You are banned from this site.
A good thing I don't care if I'm banned or whatever then, isn't it. SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
>You spend plenty of time posting anyway.
Was that supposed to be a point? Objection, immaterial
>We do, leave.
Did you think of that, or was that just residual brain-washing?
>We told you never to come back, not "take a break".
Oh, it's "we" now? How cute. How things change.
>You are in the wrong.
Needs work. Practice it in the mirror before next time. Use a double-mirror (sometimes called a True mirror, where 2 mirrors are placed perpendicular so you can accurately observe your body-language)
>You are the only person who cares.
Clearly. The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me. Maybe that's a lesson you haven't learned with
>We are not friends. You burned every bridge long before that. You harassed, belittled, insulted and drove away everyone around you, to the point that nobody wants to interact with you.
I did. Long after Lotus, and (you) specifically did. Shall we go into the lengthy and drawn out dramas (plural) that you wrought because it was funny to you at the time?
>Nobody appreciates it. Your effort is wasted.
Well, you're talking to the wrong audience. ^_~
>But I guess a lowlife welfare parasite like you doesn't care about things like productivity, fulfillment or time management.
Ha! Rich and tasty! Alas, still lacking in an understanding of flavor-balance and control. Too much salt and acid, and not enough appreciation to the sweet, savory, and umami aspects. 4/10, not credible.
But seriously, if you wanna take shots at me at LEAST do it in the /sp/ thread. /qa/ has had enough of this
>>10563
>And you think I'm the only one?
Your perceived victimhood doesn't excuse your behavior.
>It was only after that that I decided
You have since been banned again.
>Oh, there's no actual rules? Well if there's no ACTUAL rules,....
The rules are fine. You're just do delusional you think they don't apply to you.
And that doesn't excuse spamming, harassment, threats and derailing.
>SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
No, nobody has to hold anything. Your self-important delusions are meaningless.
>Did you think of that
Yes. Leave.
>Practice it in the mirror...
More delusions.
>The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me.
Lol, lmao even.
The queer, spamming, mentally-ill, degenerate who's too retarded to hold a job thinks his thoughts are valuable.
>lengthy and drawn out dramas
Nobody cares.
>Well, you're talking to the wrong audience. ^_~
So are you. Nobody cares.
>4/10, not credible
Am I wrong? Are you not a welfare parasite? Correct me if I am mistaken.
>And you think I'm the only one?
Your perceived victimhood doesn't excuse your behavior.
>It was only after that that I decided
You have since been banned again.
>Oh, there's no actual rules? Well if there's no ACTUAL rules,....
The rules are fine. You're just do delusional you think they don't apply to you.
And that doesn't excuse spamming, harassment, threats and derailing.
>SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
No, nobody has to hold anything. Your self-important delusions are meaningless.
>Did you think of that
Yes. Leave.
>Practice it in the mirror...
More delusions.
>The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me.
Lol, lmao even.
The queer, spamming, mentally-ill, degenerate who's too retarded to hold a job thinks his thoughts are valuable.
>lengthy and drawn out dramas
Nobody cares.
>Well, you're talking to the wrong audience. ^_~
So are you. Nobody cares.
>4/10, not credible
Am I wrong? Are you not a welfare parasite? Correct me if I am mistaken.
>>10564
>Your perceived victimhood doesn't excuse your behavior.
If only you realized how ironic this statement is
>You have since been banned again.
I'd guess I have more bans than KYSfilly by this point
>The rules are fine. You're just do delusional you think they don't apply to you. And that doesn't excuse spamming, harassment, threats and derailing.
Spelling mistakes aside, low-hanging fruit no. I think the rules apply to everyone. That means you, that means me, that means him. And when they don't, yes, respect is lost.
>Yes. Leave.
<You're at 23% of this method working. It will only take 647 more tries before it's successful
>More delusions
YOU'RE the one who thought that would work
>queer
Uh, citation? I'm genuinely curious, cuz this is news to me.
>too retarded to hold a job
Here's hoping you never become disabled for doing an ACTUAL job
>So are you. Nobody cares
And yet, that's not what I'm hearing
>Are you not a welfare parasite?
No, welfare parasites don't spend ~30 years paying into social security AND enabling hard-working people to get all manner of bonuses and benefits before they broke their back doing what they were told. This is in industry, not the bitch-fist genre (I won't say it) you picked.
>Your perceived victimhood doesn't excuse your behavior.
If only you realized how ironic this statement is
>You have since been banned again.
I'd guess I have more bans than KYSfilly by this point
>The rules are fine. You're just do delusional you think they don't apply to you. And that doesn't excuse spamming, harassment, threats and derailing.
Spelling mistakes aside, low-hanging fruit no. I think the rules apply to everyone. That means you, that means me, that means him. And when they don't, yes, respect is lost.
>Yes. Leave.
<You're at 23% of this method working. It will only take 647 more tries before it's successful
>More delusions
YOU'RE the one who thought that would work
>queer
Uh, citation? I'm genuinely curious, cuz this is news to me.
>too retarded to hold a job
Here's hoping you never become disabled for doing an ACTUAL job
>So are you. Nobody cares
And yet, that's not what I'm hearing
>Are you not a welfare parasite?
No, welfare parasites don't spend ~30 years paying into social security AND enabling hard-working people to get all manner of bonuses and benefits before they broke their back doing what they were told. This is in industry, not the bitch-fist genre (I won't say it) you picked.
>>10560
>you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad
Sure, it's totally that and not because you have displayed an unwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>It takes me very minimal effort to do this, so I will persist
And less effort to ban you. Three clicks per post
>I do miss the days when we all got along
I don't believe you
>ertain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change
We're not going to let you intentionally disrupt threads. We're not going to let you harass a specific user you don't like. We're not going to let you make cryptic posts that sound like threats. You are not above the rules and we will not change that for you.
>Seriously, it would be to your credit to make a rule "Don't make Lotus mad"
We have a rule against intentional disruption and thread derailment. You repeatedly disrupted a thread over several months and were told to stop. The specific post you were initially banned for was a post where you promised to disrupt the thread indefinitely until some kind of demand was met. You were banned for that for what was intended to be a month. Your behavior since then has been absolutely horrendous and that is why it was extended.
>I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe?
You've had many opportunities to say your piece and you haven't.
>I thought you wanted me to leave
Yes
>Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
>it invalidates your current position
Do you think it validates yours?
Minor shit from seven years ago neither invalidates the position of anyone who thinks your recent behavior has been unacceptable nor does it justify your behavior.
>As a new user
As someone who should know better than to believe that the rules do not apply to him
>as bad a light as I have painted myself.
How does this help you?
>I came back in September to make a number of apologies, a number of explanations, and to play games again with my friends.
And I thought you were serious. Instead you immediately became vitriolic towards me because I was at a Mexican restaurant with family during a time you wanted attention, and because you didn't get precisely the result from a dice roll you wanted. You borderline stalked another player and caused problems for everyone. You would hold grudges over minor shit that didn't matter and would bring it up months later. You were not acting like a friend at all.
>One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person
If you are talking about me I don't think so?, I went out of my way to be nice and to not be riled when you'd send me hateful messages over things like dice rolls. If you're talking about the other guy: Yes, he did on more than one occassion, And it pissed me off, and I told him to stop. But you definitely didn't deescalate things, and blew what actions were taken out of proportion. Both of you should have just gotten the fuck over it and moved on.
>So, I decided to play my own game.
If you think it's good now, just wait until Pupper gets involved next week and we can modify the site code.
>That advice will do well, given my track-record of doing what (you) think I should
Why bother even saying this?
>No, I was banned for not violating the rules.
Technically, you were banned for promising to break rules into perpetuity.
>I decided "Oh, there's no actual rules?
This pretty well hits the nail on the head. You think that no rules apply to you. And I suppose I didn't help by not banning you earlier when you were breaking the rules, but gave leniency.
As Elway said, we just need you to stop being a pain, whether its by you not acting like an asshole, you leaving, or your posts being banned and deleted.
>A good thing I don't care if I'm banned or whatever then
soyboycryingunderamask.jpeg
>Oh, it's "we" now?
It actually is though Several people.
>>10565
>Here's hoping you never become disabled for doing an ACTUAL job
You told me that you had a job lined up at a restaurant to work as a cook, then your roommate qualified for Veterans benefits, and you figured you could live off of his pension so you quit that job.
You are perfectly able to work.
>you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad
Sure, it's totally that and not because you have displayed an unwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>It takes me very minimal effort to do this, so I will persist
And less effort to ban you. Three clicks per post
>I do miss the days when we all got along
I don't believe you
>ertain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change
We're not going to let you intentionally disrupt threads. We're not going to let you harass a specific user you don't like. We're not going to let you make cryptic posts that sound like threats. You are not above the rules and we will not change that for you.
>Seriously, it would be to your credit to make a rule "Don't make Lotus mad"
We have a rule against intentional disruption and thread derailment. You repeatedly disrupted a thread over several months and were told to stop. The specific post you were initially banned for was a post where you promised to disrupt the thread indefinitely until some kind of demand was met. You were banned for that for what was intended to be a month. Your behavior since then has been absolutely horrendous and that is why it was extended.
>I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe?
You've had many opportunities to say your piece and you haven't.
>I thought you wanted me to leave
Yes
>Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
>it invalidates your current position
Do you think it validates yours?
Minor shit from seven years ago neither invalidates the position of anyone who thinks your recent behavior has been unacceptable nor does it justify your behavior.
>As a new user
As someone who should know better than to believe that the rules do not apply to him
>as bad a light as I have painted myself.
How does this help you?
>I came back in September to make a number of apologies, a number of explanations, and to play games again with my friends.
And I thought you were serious. Instead you immediately became vitriolic towards me because I was at a Mexican restaurant with family during a time you wanted attention, and because you didn't get precisely the result from a dice roll you wanted. You borderline stalked another player and caused problems for everyone. You would hold grudges over minor shit that didn't matter and would bring it up months later. You were not acting like a friend at all.
>One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person
If you are talking about me I don't think so?, I went out of my way to be nice and to not be riled when you'd send me hateful messages over things like dice rolls. If you're talking about the other guy: Yes, he did on more than one occassion, And it pissed me off, and I told him to stop. But you definitely didn't deescalate things, and blew what actions were taken out of proportion. Both of you should have just gotten the fuck over it and moved on.
>So, I decided to play my own game.
If you think it's good now, just wait until Pupper gets involved next week and we can modify the site code.
>That advice will do well, given my track-record of doing what (you) think I should
Why bother even saying this?
>No, I was banned for not violating the rules.
Technically, you were banned for promising to break rules into perpetuity.
>I decided "Oh, there's no actual rules?
This pretty well hits the nail on the head. You think that no rules apply to you. And I suppose I didn't help by not banning you earlier when you were breaking the rules, but gave leniency.
As Elway said, we just need you to stop being a pain, whether its by you not acting like an asshole, you leaving, or your posts being banned and deleted.
>A good thing I don't care if I'm banned or whatever then
soyboycryingunderamask.jpeg
>Oh, it's "we" now?
It actually is though Several people.
>>10565
>Here's hoping you never become disabled for doing an ACTUAL job
You told me that you had a job lined up at a restaurant to work as a cook, then your roommate qualified for Veterans benefits, and you figured you could live off of his pension so you quit that job.
You are perfectly able to work.
>>10566
Huhuhuh
I've been trying for years to engage in reasonable discussion. What you're witnessing is the result of a gradual escalation from the UNwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>And less effort to ban you. Three clicks per post
And nothing of value was lost
>We have a rule against intentional disruption and thread derailment. You repeatedly disrupted a thread over several months and were told to stop. The specific post you were initially banned for was a post where you promised to disrupt the thread indefinitely until some kind of demand was met. You were banned for that for what was intended to be a month. Your behavior since then has been absolutely horrendous and that is why it was extended.
Uh, who's this We? Because he (admin) has broken all these rules, as have a number of others.
>You've had many opportunities to say your piece and you haven't.
The FUCK I haven't, every time I tried I get banned, deleted, etc. You're just an idiot, or uniniformed.
>As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
How about neither
>Do you think it validates yours? Minor shit
Oh, right. So, when the current and sitting Admin displays far worse (by the rules, the actual rules not the "I decide the rules" rules) behavior and gets a pass - advocated by me and others - it's fine, but when I do less egregious shit, it's the worst thing ever and I should be ashamed. Okay, that tracks.
>As someone who should know better than to believe that the rules do not apply to him
IDEK what that was supposed to mean, but yes. If I was a new user and I saw "Don't fuck with Admin" as a rule, I would tread carefully. Just being honest.
>How does this help you?
NGL, you made me pause and giggle on this one. Do you base all your decisions on what will bring you benefit? Better question, do you base ANY of your decisions on PRINCIPLE?
>And I thought you were serious
And I thought YOU were! You think I knew or cared what restaurant you were at? Put your fucking phone down, you idiot!
>If you're talking about the other guy: Yes, he did on more than one occassion
HOSHANNA! FOREVER!
Nothing was done of course, which is why we find ourselves here today. Again, maybe if I had erp'd with GM more
>just wait until Pupper
Oh, I expect to be the reason Pupper tightens the proverbial bolts
>Technically, you were banned for promising to break rules into perpetuity.
False. I was banned for being a dick about how ponies are furry. They are btw, but let's move on from there. That was the point where I began to ban evade, because the cause/justification for the ban was bullshit. Since then, I have admittedly become increasingly dismissive of the rules, as it has become increasingly apparent that there are no actual rules, there's simply the enforcement actions that staff does and doesn't want.
Again, this isn't critical, but if this is to be the policy (and it's an adviseable one) than make it so; quit this "you're not following the bullshit rules we have now" nonsense.
>we just need you to stop being a pain
And Elway and staff need to stop putting their dick between their legs and expecting to be catered to on the internet. When all this (Mlpol) began they had a pair of testicles and could tolerate a bit of counter-play, but NOW? Bunch of fucking nancies who expect to have a comfy time of it. Shameful.
>You told me that you had a job lined up at a restaurant to work as a cook, then your roommate qualified for Veterans benefits, and you figured you could live off of his pension so you quit that job.
>You are perfectly able to work
Hehehehehehe
Now who's doxxing? Yes, I did work as a cook, and I did rather well. I could have kept at it, but even with restaurant shoes and rubber pads on the floor, I kept tweaking my back. What's more - as I've detailed (and you curiously omitted, but you knew if you knew enough to iterate the previous) 90% of the kitchen staff - including the "head manager" - was illegal immigrants.
Seriously, I hope you never lose your mobility.
Huhuhuh
I've been trying for years to engage in reasonable discussion. What you're witnessing is the result of a gradual escalation from the UNwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>And less effort to ban you. Three clicks per post
And nothing of value was lost
>We have a rule against intentional disruption and thread derailment. You repeatedly disrupted a thread over several months and were told to stop. The specific post you were initially banned for was a post where you promised to disrupt the thread indefinitely until some kind of demand was met. You were banned for that for what was intended to be a month. Your behavior since then has been absolutely horrendous and that is why it was extended.
Uh, who's this We? Because he (admin) has broken all these rules, as have a number of others.
>You've had many opportunities to say your piece and you haven't.
The FUCK I haven't, every time I tried I get banned, deleted, etc. You're just an idiot, or uniniformed.
>As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
How about neither
>Do you think it validates yours? Minor shit
Oh, right. So, when the current and sitting Admin displays far worse (by the rules, the actual rules not the "I decide the rules" rules) behavior and gets a pass - advocated by me and others - it's fine, but when I do less egregious shit, it's the worst thing ever and I should be ashamed. Okay, that tracks.
>As someone who should know better than to believe that the rules do not apply to him
IDEK what that was supposed to mean, but yes. If I was a new user and I saw "Don't fuck with Admin" as a rule, I would tread carefully. Just being honest.
>How does this help you?
NGL, you made me pause and giggle on this one. Do you base all your decisions on what will bring you benefit? Better question, do you base ANY of your decisions on PRINCIPLE?
>And I thought you were serious
And I thought YOU were! You think I knew or cared what restaurant you were at? Put your fucking phone down, you idiot!
>If you're talking about the other guy: Yes, he did on more than one occassion
HOSHANNA! FOREVER!
Nothing was done of course, which is why we find ourselves here today. Again, maybe if I had erp'd with GM more
>just wait until Pupper
Oh, I expect to be the reason Pupper tightens the proverbial bolts
>Technically, you were banned for promising to break rules into perpetuity.
False. I was banned for being a dick about how ponies are furry. They are btw, but let's move on from there. That was the point where I began to ban evade, because the cause/justification for the ban was bullshit. Since then, I have admittedly become increasingly dismissive of the rules, as it has become increasingly apparent that there are no actual rules, there's simply the enforcement actions that staff does and doesn't want.
Again, this isn't critical, but if this is to be the policy (and it's an adviseable one) than make it so; quit this "you're not following the bullshit rules we have now" nonsense.
>we just need you to stop being a pain
And Elway and staff need to stop putting their dick between their legs and expecting to be catered to on the internet. When all this (Mlpol) began they had a pair of testicles and could tolerate a bit of counter-play, but NOW? Bunch of fucking nancies who expect to have a comfy time of it. Shameful.
>You told me that you had a job lined up at a restaurant to work as a cook, then your roommate qualified for Veterans benefits, and you figured you could live off of his pension so you quit that job.
>You are perfectly able to work
Hehehehehehe
Now who's doxxing? Yes, I did work as a cook, and I did rather well. I could have kept at it, but even with restaurant shoes and rubber pads on the floor, I kept tweaking my back. What's more - as I've detailed (and you curiously omitted, but you knew if you knew enough to iterate the previous) 90% of the kitchen staff - including the "head manager" - was illegal immigrants.
Seriously, I hope you never lose your mobility.
>>10568
I will, actually, but only on the condition that the others apologize for what they have done.
I will, actually, but only on the condition that the others apologize for what they have done.
>>10567
>>As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
>How about neither
>2. Post in good faith, do not derail threads, and do not be massively disruptive of the experience of others.
Bong here. You're being a cunt. Stop it.
>>As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
>How about neither
>2. Post in good faith, do not derail threads, and do not be massively disruptive of the experience of others.
Bong here. You're being a cunt. Stop it.
>>10575
And what about you suggests sense? Serious question. I know (you) know you, but from what you've posted, you're operating at a deficit if you're suggesting that your position is in any way more plausible than mine.
And what about you suggests sense? Serious question. I know (you) know you, but from what you've posted, you're operating at a deficit if you're suggesting that your position is in any way more plausible than mine.
>>10572
There is no way, no way in hell that you actually care that much about what happened seven or more years ago.
In any case, our position remains the same: you will stop being a pain.
There is no way, no way in hell that you actually care that much about what happened seven or more years ago.
In any case, our position remains the same: you will stop being a pain.
>>10577
No, I was hoping to get you to be specific with terminology. This is the problem with language. One can know the language inside, outside, and backwards, but if the person they're talking to knows fuckall that a fork isn't a hair-comb, then the conversation is moot
No, I was hoping to get you to be specific with terminology. This is the problem with language. One can know the language inside, outside, and backwards, but if the person they're talking to knows fuckall that a fork isn't a hair-comb, then the conversation is moot
>>10578
I wouldn't care, except what happened those years ago wer forgiven, erased, and memory-holed. Meanwhile, what I'm doing - far less egregious (unless you're Lotus) - is cause for excommunicado
I wouldn't care, except what happened those years ago wer forgiven, erased, and memory-holed. Meanwhile, what I'm doing - far less egregious (unless you're Lotus) - is cause for excommunicado
Anonymous
No.10581
>>10579
>Stop being a cunt
<define cunt
I'm not playing this game. You know exactly what you're doing, and are trying to create linguistic traps to justify it.
>Stop being a cunt
<define cunt
I'm not playing this game. You know exactly what you're doing, and are trying to create linguistic traps to justify it.
>>10580
The problem isn't what happened in the past. The problem is that you refuse to stop in the present, and going into the future.
The problem isn't what happened in the past. The problem is that you refuse to stop in the present, and going into the future.
>>10582
Sorry, sorry, I know you guys are thick.
What I MEAN is "If what happened in the past isn't a problem", then why am I ban evading? You pretend that the one isn't related to the other.
Sorry, sorry, I know you guys are thick.
What I MEAN is "If what happened in the past isn't a problem", then why am I ban evading? You pretend that the one isn't related to the other.
>>10584
See you can't admit wrong doing. This is why no one gives a fuck why you are doing this. Go be retarded somewhere else.
See you can't admit wrong doing. This is why no one gives a fuck why you are doing this. Go be retarded somewhere else.
>Don't be a cunt
>2. Post in good faith, do not derail threads, and do not be massively disruptive of the experience of others.
Apparently that's too complicated.
>2. Post in good faith, do not derail threads, and do not be massively disruptive of the experience of others.
Apparently that's too complicated.
>>10589
It's explained pretty well by Brit anon in >>10573
Stop intentionally trying to make the experience of other users bad because you're trying to leverage something you want.
That's what you were doing in disrupting the thread. That's actually what you've been doing with the ban evading. Just being an ass in hopes it motivates people to do things you want. That is against the rule, specifically Rule 2. See >>10591
It's explained pretty well by Brit anon in >>10573
Stop intentionally trying to make the experience of other users bad because you're trying to leverage something you want.
That's what you were doing in disrupting the thread. That's actually what you've been doing with the ban evading. Just being an ass in hopes it motivates people to do things you want. That is against the rule, specifically Rule 2. See >>10591
Rule 2: Post in good faith, do not derail threads, and do not be massively disruptive of the experience of others.
This can be summed up as "Don't be a cunt."
You were and are being a cunt, specifically by repeatedly posting in a specific thread in the hopes of annoying several people until they did things you want. You were intentionally disrupting the experience of others in the hopes it would extort them into doing things you want. You're actually still doing that with your ban evading, hoping you can strong arm staff into ending the ban.
Stop. Stop being a cunt.
This can be summed up as "Don't be a cunt."
You were and are being a cunt, specifically by repeatedly posting in a specific thread in the hopes of annoying several people until they did things you want. You were intentionally disrupting the experience of others in the hopes it would extort them into doing things you want. You're actually still doing that with your ban evading, hoping you can strong arm staff into ending the ban.
Stop. Stop being a cunt.
Anonymous
No.10596
This cunt has no perception on reality, he is unable to process what it means to not be a cunt.
>The nigger is still spamming the appeal and report system
You know we can just edit post numbers in the database, right?
You know we can just edit post numbers in the database, right?
>>10602
Verily. I fail to understand whats so difficult to understand about the rules. Yes, they were altered during Das Hack, but they are pretty liberal even before. Just don't be a Ninjaz.
>>10603
What IP range is he posting from?
Verily. I fail to understand whats so difficult to understand about the rules. Yes, they were altered during Das Hack, but they are pretty liberal even before. Just don't be a Ninjaz.
>>10603
What IP range is he posting from?
>He quits as soon as he is BTFO'd
Imagine that
>>10604
The current code hashes IPs and allows rather little information to be gathered about the IP a user is posting from, compared to say, the software 4chan is rn on.
Imagine that
>>10604
The current code hashes IPs and allows rather little information to be gathered about the IP a user is posting from, compared to say, the software 4chan is rn on.
Anonymous
No.10607
>>10605
That's fair, hence the lack of rangebans.
>>10606
Gonna need a big ass ladder for that pit you've dug mate.
That's fair, hence the lack of rangebans.
>>10606
Gonna need a big ass ladder for that pit you've dug mate.
Anonymous
No.10609
>>10565
>No, welfare parasites don't spend ~30 years paying into social security
So you're a social security parasite. Degenerates like you are the reason why that scam even still exists.
Do the country a favor and neck yourself.
>>10566
>And I thought you were serious
He was never serious. He only started the week after I blocked him and told him I never wanted to speak with him again, and by his own admission he only did it to solicit unwanted contact again. This was of course right after he was harassing and belittling me for months and said I was "dead to him" for daring to participate in a board game without his permission.
And then he acted all buttblasted and spammed the thread for months because I wasn't immediately 120% friendly with him and constantly begging for his approval like I had been for years. What a degenerate.
>you'd send me hateful messages over things like dice rolls
Wow, I didn't know that. I'm sorry you had to go through that.
>>10567
>I've been trying for years to engage in reasonable discussion
No you have not.
>What you're witnessing is the result of a gradual escalation from the UNwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
What I'm witnessing is your spiral into insanity and making a fool of yourself.
>Because he (admin) has broken all these rules, as have a number of others.
So just because Jews eat children, it's okay for you to eat children too?
Just because someone else did something in the past doesn't make it okay for you to do it too.
>You're just an idiot
Funny, the degenerate who can't hold a job is calling other people idiots.
>far worse
Your spamming, harassment, derailing and threats have affected everyone on the site. You are the worst creature here by leaps and bounds since Zald, and he wasn't nearly as petty. Even the boomer is better than you.
>egregious shit, it's the worst thing ever and I should be ashamed
Yes. You should be. Everyone is sick of your sewage.
>Do you base all your decisions on what will bring you benefit?
Employed people care about spending their time wisely. Of course a degenerate parasite like you wouldn't know.
>And I thought YOU were! You think I knew or cared what restaurant you were at? Put your fucking phone down, you idiot!
What a shameless freak.
>which is why we find ourselves here today
No, you are spamming the board because you are a degenerate loser with nothing better to do. Nobody else would make such a fool of themselves over a board game.
>expecting to be catered to on the internet
That's you. That's what you are doing.
>tolerate a bit of counter-play
They've been banning spammers like you since the beginning. The /jp/sies, the donkey show, Zald, Nigel, all of the spammers were banned.
>I could have kept at it
So you are able to work, but you leech off of taxpayers instead. Parasite, through and through. A gangrenous limb.
A burden to society. Absolute untermensch.
And the fact that you live off of SS benefits also means that you'll probably never get married either. Not that anyone would want too of course.
>>10586
>I've admitted to all the wrongs!
Then leave.
>No, welfare parasites don't spend ~30 years paying into social security
So you're a social security parasite. Degenerates like you are the reason why that scam even still exists.
Do the country a favor and neck yourself.
>>10566
>And I thought you were serious
He was never serious. He only started the week after I blocked him and told him I never wanted to speak with him again, and by his own admission he only did it to solicit unwanted contact again. This was of course right after he was harassing and belittling me for months and said I was "dead to him" for daring to participate in a board game without his permission.
And then he acted all buttblasted and spammed the thread for months because I wasn't immediately 120% friendly with him and constantly begging for his approval like I had been for years. What a degenerate.
>you'd send me hateful messages over things like dice rolls
Wow, I didn't know that. I'm sorry you had to go through that.
>>10567
>I've been trying for years to engage in reasonable discussion
No you have not.
>What you're witnessing is the result of a gradual escalation from the UNwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
What I'm witnessing is your spiral into insanity and making a fool of yourself.
>Because he (admin) has broken all these rules, as have a number of others.
So just because Jews eat children, it's okay for you to eat children too?
Just because someone else did something in the past doesn't make it okay for you to do it too.
>You're just an idiot
Funny, the degenerate who can't hold a job is calling other people idiots.
>far worse
Your spamming, harassment, derailing and threats have affected everyone on the site. You are the worst creature here by leaps and bounds since Zald, and he wasn't nearly as petty. Even the boomer is better than you.
>egregious shit, it's the worst thing ever and I should be ashamed
Yes. You should be. Everyone is sick of your sewage.
>Do you base all your decisions on what will bring you benefit?
Employed people care about spending their time wisely. Of course a degenerate parasite like you wouldn't know.
>And I thought YOU were! You think I knew or cared what restaurant you were at? Put your fucking phone down, you idiot!
What a shameless freak.
>which is why we find ourselves here today
No, you are spamming the board because you are a degenerate loser with nothing better to do. Nobody else would make such a fool of themselves over a board game.
>expecting to be catered to on the internet
That's you. That's what you are doing.
>tolerate a bit of counter-play
They've been banning spammers like you since the beginning. The /jp/sies, the donkey show, Zald, Nigel, all of the spammers were banned.
>I could have kept at it
So you are able to work, but you leech off of taxpayers instead. Parasite, through and through. A gangrenous limb.
A burden to society. Absolute untermensch.
And the fact that you live off of SS benefits also means that you'll probably never get married either. Not that anyone would want too of course.
>>10586
>I've admitted to all the wrongs!
Then leave.
You're going to have to get over this whole "I delete everything that makes me look bad" thing, unless you want to be known as the guy who deletes everything that makes them look bad
Anonymous
No.10613
Anonymous
No.10616
>>10615
>That will serve you well.
You are the only person who has a problem with it.
Sounds more like a you problem.
>That will serve you well.
You are the only person who has a problem with it.
Sounds more like a you problem.
>>10610
Wait, when did you block him, and when did he contact you?
I think he contacted me and a few others around September of 2024. I only invited him to the game something like 6 weeks later I think. At the end of October, I believe.
Wait, when did you block him, and when did he contact you?
I think he contacted me and a few others around September of 2024. I only invited him to the game something like 6 weeks later I think. At the end of October, I believe.
Anonymous
No.10620
>>10618
I blocked him like a couple weeks before he joined the game. This was after weeks of cryptic, threatening posts and him shaming me for playing. It was either some time after mid September, or early October. I remember it, but not exactly, because he had taken it up on himself to harass me while I was recovering from a Cat 5 hurricane hitting my home and the power was out.
That's all I want to mention here though.
I blocked him like a couple weeks before he joined the game. This was after weeks of cryptic, threatening posts and him shaming me for playing. It was either some time after mid September, or early October. I remember it, but not exactly, because he had taken it up on himself to harass me while I was recovering from a Cat 5 hurricane hitting my home and the power was out.
That's all I want to mention here though.
Anonymous
No.10622
>>10621
I have the chat log right in front of me, you piece of shit.
I have the chat log right in front of me, you piece of shit.
Anonymous
No.10624
>dismisses any claims made against him as “lies” without actually refuting anything or providing an alternate story
>claims that he has so much information that “makes staff look bad,” but only succeeds in making himself look bad
>insists he broke and is breaking no rules but shuts up once it’s demonstrated he’s a cunt
>still has no explanation for why people doing bad things three quarters of a decade ago makes him justified in being a cunt
>thinks that he’s made any claims at all that could even be true or untrue, and it’s him speaking “the truth”
>has now made his new name of choice into a general word meaning a colossal faggot or cunt
>claims that he has so much information that “makes staff look bad,” but only succeeds in making himself look bad
>insists he broke and is breaking no rules but shuts up once it’s demonstrated he’s a cunt
>still has no explanation for why people doing bad things three quarters of a decade ago makes him justified in being a cunt
>thinks that he’s made any claims at all that could even be true or untrue, and it’s him speaking “the truth”
>has now made his new name of choice into a general word meaning a colossal faggot or cunt
Oh, I’ve left more than enough of your posts for everyone to see what a cunt you are. I’m just provoking you into posting so you burn through more of your proxies. We’re up to 34 today.
>>10628
There would be more problems if he allowed ban evading, criminal, spammers like you to roam free. Stay banned, cunt.
There would be more problems if he allowed ban evading, criminal, spammers like you to roam free. Stay banned, cunt.
>>10560
>I'm talking about the /sp/ thread with the cute pink scene-pony.
Oh, okay. See, this wouldn't have even occurred to me, because that thread hasn't been posted in for over a month, and I completely forgot it even existed. The last thing I remember you talking about in regards to /sp/ was that game thread you were asking for. This is why it helps to actually be specific when referencing things. You know, as opposed to speaking in vague riddles all of the time and just assuming that everyone can read your mind. If you're referring to a specific thread, just link to the thread; it's easy to do. Just to show you how it works, here is a link to the exact thread you're talking about: >>>/sp/25515 →
It's the same as when you said "the hidden place" instead of just saying /Test/ if that's what you meant. You keep tap-dancing around the edges of every conversation, speaking in hazy insinuations, and expecting everyone to just somehow parse the truth from your inarticulate ranting. Old Testament prophecies are less vague than the gobbledygook you post.
>I can explain what this means in detail, but you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline.
Actually, what I have a lack of appreciation for is the way you keep writing reams upon reams of text, yet always dance around the edges of subjects instead of just saying what is actually on your mind. Stop speaking in riddles and just state, clearly, whatever the hell it is you're trying to say and maybe you'll be taken more seriously, or at least listened to.
>Oh, is this a court of law where I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe? I thought you wanted me to leave. Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
What the hell are you even talking about? Here is what I actually wrote in the post you quoted:
>We actually have had a lot of fun over the years.
This was in response to another post, made by a completely different anon, that was not even part of the main conversation. It wasn't addressed to you, and there's nothing in there about forcing you to respond to anything, inside or outside of any particular timeframe. I'm at a loss as to how you even got any of this from what I wrote. Maybe you meant to quote a different post?
>I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days, but in order for that to happen certain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change. That, or the rules need to.
This goes back to what I was saying earlier: that your biggest problem is an unwillingness to accept any kind of limits being placed on you, or any consequences for your ridiculous behavior. Everyone has to accept your terms and play by your insane rules. Sorry, chief; I'm afraid that's not how things work around here.
>I'm talking about the /sp/ thread with the cute pink scene-pony.
Oh, okay. See, this wouldn't have even occurred to me, because that thread hasn't been posted in for over a month, and I completely forgot it even existed. The last thing I remember you talking about in regards to /sp/ was that game thread you were asking for. This is why it helps to actually be specific when referencing things. You know, as opposed to speaking in vague riddles all of the time and just assuming that everyone can read your mind. If you're referring to a specific thread, just link to the thread; it's easy to do. Just to show you how it works, here is a link to the exact thread you're talking about: >>>/sp/25515 →
It's the same as when you said "the hidden place" instead of just saying /Test/ if that's what you meant. You keep tap-dancing around the edges of every conversation, speaking in hazy insinuations, and expecting everyone to just somehow parse the truth from your inarticulate ranting. Old Testament prophecies are less vague than the gobbledygook you post.
>I can explain what this means in detail, but you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline.
Actually, what I have a lack of appreciation for is the way you keep writing reams upon reams of text, yet always dance around the edges of subjects instead of just saying what is actually on your mind. Stop speaking in riddles and just state, clearly, whatever the hell it is you're trying to say and maybe you'll be taken more seriously, or at least listened to.
>Oh, is this a court of law where I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe? I thought you wanted me to leave. Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
What the hell are you even talking about? Here is what I actually wrote in the post you quoted:
>We actually have had a lot of fun over the years.
This was in response to another post, made by a completely different anon, that was not even part of the main conversation. It wasn't addressed to you, and there's nothing in there about forcing you to respond to anything, inside or outside of any particular timeframe. I'm at a loss as to how you even got any of this from what I wrote. Maybe you meant to quote a different post?
>I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days, but in order for that to happen certain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change. That, or the rules need to.
This goes back to what I was saying earlier: that your biggest problem is an unwillingness to accept any kind of limits being placed on you, or any consequences for your ridiculous behavior. Everyone has to accept your terms and play by your insane rules. Sorry, chief; I'm afraid that's not how things work around here.
Anonymous
No.10633
>>10632
>this wouldn't have even occurred to me
We've established that you're not quick to the draw, yes.
>I completely forgot!
Yes, your goldfish-memory is well detailed.
>/sp/ thread you were asking for
Yes, I did try to plan that many MANY months in advance, but Lotus wouldn't have it.
>Actually, what I have a lack of appreciation for is the way you keep writing reams upon reams of text, yet always dance around the edges of subjects instead of just saying what is actually on your mind. Stop speaking in riddles and just state, clearly, whatever the hell it is you're trying to say and maybe you'll be taken more seriously, or at least listened to.
Oh, are you actually listening now?
>this wouldn't have even occurred to me
We've established that you're not quick to the draw, yes.
>I completely forgot!
Yes, your goldfish-memory is well detailed.
>/sp/ thread you were asking for
Yes, I did try to plan that many MANY months in advance, but Lotus wouldn't have it.
>Actually, what I have a lack of appreciation for is the way you keep writing reams upon reams of text, yet always dance around the edges of subjects instead of just saying what is actually on your mind. Stop speaking in riddles and just state, clearly, whatever the hell it is you're trying to say and maybe you'll be taken more seriously, or at least listened to.
Oh, are you actually listening now?
>>10560
>>10563
>>10611
>>10567
>I've been trying for years to engage in reasonable discussion. What you're witnessing is the result of a gradual escalation from the UNwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>Uh, who's this We? Because he (admin) has broken all these rules, as have a number of others.
>You're going to have to get over this whole "I delete everything that makes me look bad" thing, unless you want to be known as the guy who deletes everything that makes them look bad
>This is the problem with Lotus. No matter what you do, he's going to frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
>No, you WANT people to not care because you know it invalidates your current position, because it paints you in as bad a light as I have painted myself.
>Remember when you couldn't stop deleting and editing posts on the board AND the discord? To the point we had to make a second discord cuz you are an absolute control freak? Anyway,....
>One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person who simply would not let it stand that I was having fun and playing games with all the old crew and sought to sabotage my experience, and regrettably he was enabled to. So, I decided to play my own game. It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
>SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
>The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me. Maybe that's a lesson you haven't learned with
>Shall we go into the lengthy and drawn out dramas (plural) that you wrought because it was funny to you at the time?
I have a proposal for you:
How about, instead of just tap-dancing around making all of these mysterious insinuations, you just clarify whatever the fuck it is you're so angry about in plain, readable English so we can all move on. You keep insinuating, both here and in private chat, that you're carrying some sort of Samson option in your back pocket that would completely obliterate Lotus, Pupper, myself, the /mlpol/ moderation team in general, and whoever and whatever the fuck else has had your taint in a tornado for nigh these many years.
So, out with it. Let's hear it. Everything you've got, let's just get it all out in the open. No holds barred. Go as far back in time as you want, get as personal as you want, post links and/or screencaps where appropriate. All I ask is that you please be detailed and specific. Take as much time and as many posts as you need. As long as your posts are coherent, clear, specific, and detailed, and could be read and interpreted by anyone even if they are unfamiliar with the specifics of events you're describing, they won't be deleted.
However, this means no innuendos, no insinuations, no vague allusions, no speaking in riddles. Answer the following questions plainly and clearly: Who has your rectum so ruffled? What did they do that got your booty so bothered? Where and When did this anal agitation occur? How did these events get your hindquarters so harried, and Why is your derriere so distressed as a result of this incident and/or incidents? Again, please be specific.
>>10563
>>10611
>>10567
>I've been trying for years to engage in reasonable discussion. What you're witnessing is the result of a gradual escalation from the UNwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>Uh, who's this We? Because he (admin) has broken all these rules, as have a number of others.
>You're going to have to get over this whole "I delete everything that makes me look bad" thing, unless you want to be known as the guy who deletes everything that makes them look bad
>This is the problem with Lotus. No matter what you do, he's going to frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
>No, you WANT people to not care because you know it invalidates your current position, because it paints you in as bad a light as I have painted myself.
>Remember when you couldn't stop deleting and editing posts on the board AND the discord? To the point we had to make a second discord cuz you are an absolute control freak? Anyway,....
>One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person who simply would not let it stand that I was having fun and playing games with all the old crew and sought to sabotage my experience, and regrettably he was enabled to. So, I decided to play my own game. It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
>SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
>The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me. Maybe that's a lesson you haven't learned with
>Shall we go into the lengthy and drawn out dramas (plural) that you wrought because it was funny to you at the time?
I have a proposal for you:
How about, instead of just tap-dancing around making all of these mysterious insinuations, you just clarify whatever the fuck it is you're so angry about in plain, readable English so we can all move on. You keep insinuating, both here and in private chat, that you're carrying some sort of Samson option in your back pocket that would completely obliterate Lotus, Pupper, myself, the /mlpol/ moderation team in general, and whoever and whatever the fuck else has had your taint in a tornado for nigh these many years.
So, out with it. Let's hear it. Everything you've got, let's just get it all out in the open. No holds barred. Go as far back in time as you want, get as personal as you want, post links and/or screencaps where appropriate. All I ask is that you please be detailed and specific. Take as much time and as many posts as you need. As long as your posts are coherent, clear, specific, and detailed, and could be read and interpreted by anyone even if they are unfamiliar with the specifics of events you're describing, they won't be deleted.
However, this means no innuendos, no insinuations, no vague allusions, no speaking in riddles. Answer the following questions plainly and clearly: Who has your rectum so ruffled? What did they do that got your booty so bothered? Where and When did this anal agitation occur? How did these events get your hindquarters so harried, and Why is your derriere so distressed as a result of this incident and/or incidents? Again, please be specific.
Anonymous
No.10636
>>10635
Cry more you retarded faggot.
Cry more you retarded faggot.
Anonymous
No.10638
>>10637
LMAO
LMAO
Anonymous
No.10639
>>10637
Who's behaving shamefully? You asked for your day in court, I'm giving it to you. Instead of speaking your piece, you're deflecting and continuing to accuse others of somehow not playing straight with you. All you're proving here is that you're the "little bitch" that you've been accusing everyone else of being. You don't have any valid grievances, nor is anyone attempting to silence or censor you; you're just a malignant asshole and you can't handle being actually called out on it.
Who's behaving shamefully? You asked for your day in court, I'm giving it to you. Instead of speaking your piece, you're deflecting and continuing to accuse others of somehow not playing straight with you. All you're proving here is that you're the "little bitch" that you've been accusing everyone else of being. You don't have any valid grievances, nor is anyone attempting to silence or censor you; you're just a malignant asshole and you can't handle being actually called out on it.
>opening mlpol
>seeing /qa/ is the most active board rn
>guessing it has to do with ninjaz again
>it is ninjaz again
>the never ending drama artist
jesus fuckig wacked
>seeing /qa/ is the most active board rn
>guessing it has to do with ninjaz again
>it is ninjaz again
>the never ending drama artist
jesus fuckig wacked
>>10642
checking the statistics, /qa/ is also responsible for majority of today's PPH
arguing with something that has no mind or logical reasoning beyond being annoying is a long endeavour
checking the statistics, /qa/ is also responsible for majority of today's PPH
arguing with something that has no mind or logical reasoning beyond being annoying is a long endeavour
Friends please be nice
>>10640
>Who's behaving shamefully
Your perspective is clear, as is your unwillingness to hear mine or allow it to persist. Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer
>Who's behaving shamefully
Your perspective is clear, as is your unwillingness to hear mine or allow it to persist. Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer
>>10646
Just say it. Obviously the deletions aren’t stopping you. And you’ve said nothing of substance so far
Just say it. Obviously the deletions aren’t stopping you. And you’ve said nothing of substance so far
>>10648
Then why do you keep posting at all?
You don’t have any grand allegations, you don’t have a justification, and you have nothing to share.
Then why do you keep posting at all?
You don’t have any grand allegations, you don’t have a justification, and you have nothing to share.
Anonymous
No.10653
>>10643
>checking the statistics, /qa/ is also responsible for majority of today's PPH...
seems like trolls(and drama) are the only motoviating reasons to make the anons to be active
last week it was nigel now it is ninjaz
i wish anons put the same energy for /poner/ (can't say it for /mlpol/ tho , the board's activity is ain't that bad)
>>10652
>he has no valid arguments
agreed
>checking the statistics, /qa/ is also responsible for majority of today's PPH...
seems like trolls(and drama) are the only motoviating reasons to make the anons to be active
last week it was nigel now it is ninjaz
i wish anons put the same energy for /poner/ (can't say it for /mlpol/ tho , the board's activity is ain't that bad)
>>10652
>he has no valid arguments
agreed
Anonymous
No.10654
>>10650
the fucking ego on this guy
do you want me to say sorry on behalf of you?
--
Sorry your honors , My client is retarded
the fucking ego on this guy
do you want me to say sorry on behalf of you?
--
Sorry your honors , My client is retarded
Anonymous
No.10657
Lads still a cunt then
Anonymous
No.10661
1755194814_1.jpg (79.1 KB, 1800x900, Zorg-in-his-office-at-Zorg-Industries-in-The-Fifth-Element-395844755.jpg)
1755194814_2.png (2.0 MB, 1024x1536, f4a38367-4e1e-46d1-87b9-0704398fc6fc.png)
Requesting a motion for continuance until after Marefair.
In exchange, I will simply stop posting. I'll still ban evade to write reports - actual reports, not my cheeky shenanigens - but will otherwise desist entirely.
In exchange, I will simply stop posting. I'll still ban evade to write reports - actual reports, not my cheeky shenanigens - but will otherwise desist entirely.
Anonymous
No.10663
Remember to immediately report this lunatic to the cops if he actually shows up at Mare Fair. He has threaten to kill people there, and he's a convicted felon crossing state lines to attack people. If push comes to shove and he approaches you, don't hesitate to open fire on the faggot in the ugly red cow fursuit (well, do hesitate if there's a crowd), because he IS dangerous.
If he's not put in prison for years, it's still possible to get him kicked off of SS gibs if he stays in prison for more than 30 days.
If he's not put in prison for years, it's still possible to get him kicked off of SS gibs if he stays in prison for more than 30 days.
>>10664
i can't with another brony massacre
we already don't have a good reputation over the last incident
i can't with another brony massacre
we already don't have a good reputation over the last incident
>>10665
>i can't with another brony massacre
That's what I'm hoping to prevent. Go to the police first if this faggot shows his fursuited-face at the venue.
>i can't with another brony massacre
That's what I'm hoping to prevent. Go to the police first if this faggot shows his fursuited-face at the venue.
>>10666
i don't live in america , but i hope everyone be safe from this lunatic
if someone has contact with marefair owners or any staff , please warn them
i don't live in america , but i hope everyone be safe from this lunatic
if someone has contact with marefair owners or any staff , please warn them
>>10664
>threatened to kill people
Okay, this is a blatant lie
>attack people
Now who's the 'crazy' person?
>>10667
Oh, I warned Snowpity over a month ago that I was shitposting all over several individuals. Not only are they aware, but their official position is that they are only concerned with what people do at the convention.
Having said, you will have a hard time getting police involved because of things said on an otherwise anonymous board on the internet.
I was going to leave it alone, but this is egregious.
Yes Elway, shameful.
>threatened to kill people
Okay, this is a blatant lie
>attack people
Now who's the 'crazy' person?
>>10667
Oh, I warned Snowpity over a month ago that I was shitposting all over several individuals. Not only are they aware, but their official position is that they are only concerned with what people do at the convention.
Having said, you will have a hard time getting police involved because of things said on an otherwise anonymous board on the internet.
I was going to leave it alone, but this is egregious.
Yes Elway, shameful.
Anonymous
No.10669
And just to clarify, I didn't mention names/screen-names, I informed them that I was in the midst of a 'tiff' with an otherwise whale-supporter who they probably knew but I wasn't going to say who.
I assured them that in spite of any allegations I wouldn't engage in any form of violence or aggression, in spite of what they might hear through channels.
I'm not even bringing the safety rapier. Go ahead, call the cops on the unarmed man.
I assured them that in spite of any allegations I wouldn't engage in any form of violence or aggression, in spite of what they might hear through channels.
I'm not even bringing the safety rapier. Go ahead, call the cops on the unarmed man.
He openly threatened to strangle people at a real world event and location. Don't let him talk his way into the venue. He is a dangerous lunatic.
Anonymous
No.10671
Aye, still being a Ninjaz then.
Anonymous
No.10672
>>10670
I said I could if I needed to, even if (you) had a ccw. Specifically, I boasted that I could take 3 people at the same time. Go ahead, tell the police
I said I could if I needed to, even if (you) had a ccw. Specifically, I boasted that I could take 3 people at the same time. Go ahead, tell the police
Anonymous
No.10673
The assumption being that the 3 people are horsefuckers who - outside of 2 individuals I'm aware of - I'll take on 3 at a time.
Lad probably spends most of his time having pretend fights in his bedroom if he thinks that.
Anonymous
No.10675
>>10674
What do you think makiwara is?
<Yer supposed to be fuckin' off
Fine, but you're idiots if you think I'll do anything to harm anyone, and if you really wanna get froggy and have me arrested, well it's pretty obvious who/why, and how long I'll be in holding versus you're the bitch(es) who made it happen.
What do you think makiwara is?
<Yer supposed to be fuckin' off
Fine, but you're idiots if you think I'll do anything to harm anyone, and if you really wanna get froggy and have me arrested, well it's pretty obvious who/why, and how long I'll be in holding versus you're the bitch(es) who made it happen.
Anonymous
No.10676
Fuck me he's an actual weeb....
>>10662
>Requesting a motion for continuance until after Marefair.
There's not really anything to request a continuance on, you're still banned either way. It's up to you whether or not you want to keep on wasting your time by making us ban your proxies. You're not holding any cards here.
>>10668
>Yes Elway, shameful.
Just letting you know, my offer to let you publicly present your case here if you want still stands. I won't delete it, and I will see to it that nobody else does either, if that's what you're worried about. I mean, you're going to keep ban-evading no matter what we do, so you've got nothing to lose. So far, you haven't accomplished much apart from making yourself look foolish.
>Requesting a motion for continuance until after Marefair.
There's not really anything to request a continuance on, you're still banned either way. It's up to you whether or not you want to keep on wasting your time by making us ban your proxies. You're not holding any cards here.
>>10668
>Yes Elway, shameful.
Just letting you know, my offer to let you publicly present your case here if you want still stands. I won't delete it, and I will see to it that nobody else does either, if that's what you're worried about. I mean, you're going to keep ban-evading no matter what we do, so you've got nothing to lose. So far, you haven't accomplished much apart from making yourself look foolish.
>>10677
I really hope you take this guy seriously. When I say he's dangerous, I'm not fucking around. This guy is a manipulative, sadistic predator who goads people into oversharing information about themselves and others just do that he can use it to blackmail, threaten, and otherwise abuse people with it.
And I know because he involved me in it. He used threat of suicide to pressure me into using my training and my equipment to compromise the anonymity of my friends (a disgrace that makes me sick to my stomach to this day), names, triangulating the location of homes, parents' criminal history, places of work, etc. And he used that information to threaten people over disagreements with board games. He is absolutely psychotic, and a menace to the community, and he won't stop at shitposting; every second he spends in a friend group he uses to abuse people at a later date. And now he's outright threatening to strangle people.
I am not going to let this faggot manipulate me or harm my friends any longer. If I have to get the police involved, I will. So help me God, if I see his ugly fursuit approaching me or anyone I care about in public, it's going to be on the news.
I really hope you take this guy seriously. When I say he's dangerous, I'm not fucking around. This guy is a manipulative, sadistic predator who goads people into oversharing information about themselves and others just do that he can use it to blackmail, threaten, and otherwise abuse people with it.
And I know because he involved me in it. He used threat of suicide to pressure me into using my training and my equipment to compromise the anonymity of my friends (a disgrace that makes me sick to my stomach to this day), names, triangulating the location of homes, parents' criminal history, places of work, etc. And he used that information to threaten people over disagreements with board games. He is absolutely psychotic, and a menace to the community, and he won't stop at shitposting; every second he spends in a friend group he uses to abuse people at a later date. And now he's outright threatening to strangle people.
I am not going to let this faggot manipulate me or harm my friends any longer. If I have to get the police involved, I will. So help me God, if I see his ugly fursuit approaching me or anyone I care about in public, it's going to be on the news.
>>10679
It's not just about my safety. I'm over 6'1" and armed to the teeth. I'm just sick of letting this manipulative degenerate harm people around me. It was one thing when he was manipulating people into divulging personal data so that he could threaten them, but now he's threatening to physically assault them at conventions.
I didn't want it to be this way, but I'm not fucking around. It's not a game anymore. I didn't want to make a scene, but I can't let this degenerate threaten my friends for even another second.
It's not just about my safety. I'm over 6'1" and armed to the teeth. I'm just sick of letting this manipulative degenerate harm people around me. It was one thing when he was manipulating people into divulging personal data so that he could threaten them, but now he's threatening to physically assault them at conventions.
I didn't want it to be this way, but I'm not fucking around. It's not a game anymore. I didn't want to make a scene, but I can't let this degenerate threaten my friends for even another second.
>>10681
I'll try... but I'm really at my wits end with this degenerate. He's been harassing and threatening my friends for years. Now he's been threatening to hurt people I know in real life, at an event that isn't far from where I live. I could live the rest of my life knowing that people got hurt because I didn't do enough to stop this guy years ago, all because I was too servatile, lonely, and eager to please that I would let a manipulative scumbag like him walk all over me, and that I didn't do anything to stop him. I don't know what to do, but I can't just do nothing.
I'll try... but I'm really at my wits end with this degenerate. He's been harassing and threatening my friends for years. Now he's been threatening to hurt people I know in real life, at an event that isn't far from where I live. I could live the rest of my life knowing that people got hurt because I didn't do enough to stop this guy years ago, all because I was too servatile, lonely, and eager to please that I would let a manipulative scumbag like him walk all over me, and that I didn't do anything to stop him. I don't know what to do, but I can't just do nothing.
Anonymous
No.10683
>>10682
As I said. Be level headed. I've dealt with a few people like Ninjaz in the past, all bags of hot air when behind a keyboard and immediately start shitting themselves when push comes to shove.
As I said. Be level headed. I've dealt with a few people like Ninjaz in the past, all bags of hot air when behind a keyboard and immediately start shitting themselves when push comes to shove.
Anonymous
No.10684
>>10678
>I really hope you take this guy seriously. When I say he's dangerous, I'm not fucking around.
I just know him as a name on a screen, I've never met him irl and don't know what he's actually like. As I've said, he comes across as a mentally unhinged, nasty sort of person. If he doesn't want to be perceived that way he should try to be a little more conscious of how his online behavior looks to people. I'm not certain how to interpret a lot of the crazier things I've heard him say.
In any event, he's made it clear that he has some deep-rooted grievances around here going back years, which he's implied are serious, and he keeps complaining that no one is willing to hear his side of things. So, I'm giving him the opportunity to have his say. If he chooses not to take it, I can only conclude that his grievances were never serious in the first place, that there is no valid cause for his butthurt, and his concerns can be dismissed.
>I really hope you take this guy seriously. When I say he's dangerous, I'm not fucking around.
I just know him as a name on a screen, I've never met him irl and don't know what he's actually like. As I've said, he comes across as a mentally unhinged, nasty sort of person. If he doesn't want to be perceived that way he should try to be a little more conscious of how his online behavior looks to people. I'm not certain how to interpret a lot of the crazier things I've heard him say.
In any event, he's made it clear that he has some deep-rooted grievances around here going back years, which he's implied are serious, and he keeps complaining that no one is willing to hear his side of things. So, I'm giving him the opportunity to have his say. If he chooses not to take it, I can only conclude that his grievances were never serious in the first place, that there is no valid cause for his butthurt, and his concerns can be dismissed.
Anonymous
No.10687
>>10686
Pardon, I didn't mean take him seriously. I meant take his threats seriously and deal with him in a serious manner.
Pardon, I didn't mean take him seriously. I meant take his threats seriously and deal with him in a serious manner.
>>10685
Try harder
>>10686
I have a feeling you may be serious, so aside from preventing myself from being further defamed (beyond general shitposting, the edits are perfectly fine) I'm serious about not posting.
But the reason I came was to report that it's thursday
https://youtu.be/zZdVwTjUtjg?si=0NvZuIoffvNeUkz0
Try harder
>>10686
I have a feeling you may be serious, so aside from preventing myself from being further defamed (beyond general shitposting, the edits are perfectly fine) I'm serious about not posting.
But the reason I came was to report that it's thursday
https://youtu.be/zZdVwTjUtjg?si=0NvZuIoffvNeUkz0
1755225366.gif (835.3 KB, 498x278, dont-call-me-shirley-shirley.gif)
>>10688
>I have a feeling you may be serious
Nigger, I don't know how I could possibly make this any clearer than I already have. You obviously feel that you have been done some egregious wrong by the administrators of this website, because you've been squawking about it for years now. So whatever it is, just get it off your flippin' chest already so we can all move on with our lives. If you don't want to do that, then please shut up and fuck off.
>I have a feeling you may be serious
Nigger, I don't know how I could possibly make this any clearer than I already have. You obviously feel that you have been done some egregious wrong by the administrators of this website, because you've been squawking about it for years now. So whatever it is, just get it off your flippin' chest already so we can all move on with our lives. If you don't want to do that, then please shut up and fuck off.
>>10686
>he comes across as a mentally unhinged, nasty sort of person.
I've actually met several people like him working in the criminal justice system. At first, when you meet them, they are super happy to talk to you. They are very grateful for listening to them and are if anything, overly thankful. Then incessant communication starts. A dozen phone calls in one day. Dozens upon dozens to hundreds of texts or possibly emails in a short time. Then come the demands, wondering why you haven't done x impossible thing in a ridiculously short period of time. They start to take every bit of inattention personally, and by this time you actually are intentionally ignoring them because they are so annoying. They become personally vindictive against you, and believe that you are working against them. In every one of the few times I have encountered this type of person, I've had to say that I cannot handle them and I need to step back.
I don't think this kind of behavior is within the norm of human behavior. It's some kind of mental illness, I assume most closely related to bipolar disorder. I've assumed it to be caused by drug usage, maybe by specific drugs. But really, I don't know.
>>10686
>>10693
The only complaints with any kind of legitimacy he may have are against me from the first quarter of 2018, and those didn't involve him. Maybe from that time he tried to play politics with me and lost, later in 2018. He has no grievances with any kind of merit more recent than that, or against anyone else. What he's not going to mention is that he had actually forgiven me at the time and was helpful to me, through parts of 2018 and certainly after, when he was on staff. He didn't have any real problems with anyone until in 2020, when multiple people on staff told him that he could not do just anything he wanted and he needs to stop doing specific things. In fact, he didn't have real problems with me in 2024 and 2025 until I didn't give him as much attention as he wanted (no one could), and when I banned him. He was trying to regularly harass a specific person he didn't like to stalkerish levels, and I told him that if he was going to harass this guy, he needed to do it somewhere else than mlpol and on the discord, because the hundreds of incessant posts were driving me insane and were stopping regular usage of the website. He openly defied the idea of limiting his posts, so I banned him, and now he has serious issues with me.
Maybe he'll reply to this post with "noooo I've had problems with you for longer than that!" or "That time you outplayed me in politics happened in 2021, not 2018!" or something completely pointless like that. What I don't think he is ever going to do is to get the point. He thinks that being allowed to do things is all about some leger of bad versus good actions. It isn't. It's much simpler than that. There are certain things we need people to not do so we can go about our normal lives, because when you do those things, it stops us. Just stop doing those things. Just stop. We don't care about the past so much because this is an image board and none of this shit matters. What we care about is what happens in the present and the future.
There is absolutely nothing that Ninjas could possibly claim happened in the past that could justify his firm belief that he is entitled to do whatever the hell he wants on this website with no possible limits. He will try to say "oh, other people violated the rules in the past. That means that they can't apply to me in the present!" That's the only thing he could possibly say. That's the only thing he's ever said. Well, that and "I paid server fees in 2018!" And no one is ever going to buy that argument.
There's nothing to hear out from Ninjas, because there is no argument he could make that could have as a conclusion "Ninjas can do anything he wants with no repercussions."
>he comes across as a mentally unhinged, nasty sort of person.
I've actually met several people like him working in the criminal justice system. At first, when you meet them, they are super happy to talk to you. They are very grateful for listening to them and are if anything, overly thankful. Then incessant communication starts. A dozen phone calls in one day. Dozens upon dozens to hundreds of texts or possibly emails in a short time. Then come the demands, wondering why you haven't done x impossible thing in a ridiculously short period of time. They start to take every bit of inattention personally, and by this time you actually are intentionally ignoring them because they are so annoying. They become personally vindictive against you, and believe that you are working against them. In every one of the few times I have encountered this type of person, I've had to say that I cannot handle them and I need to step back.
I don't think this kind of behavior is within the norm of human behavior. It's some kind of mental illness, I assume most closely related to bipolar disorder. I've assumed it to be caused by drug usage, maybe by specific drugs. But really, I don't know.
>>10686
>>10693
The only complaints with any kind of legitimacy he may have are against me from the first quarter of 2018, and those didn't involve him. Maybe from that time he tried to play politics with me and lost, later in 2018. He has no grievances with any kind of merit more recent than that, or against anyone else. What he's not going to mention is that he had actually forgiven me at the time and was helpful to me, through parts of 2018 and certainly after, when he was on staff. He didn't have any real problems with anyone until in 2020, when multiple people on staff told him that he could not do just anything he wanted and he needs to stop doing specific things. In fact, he didn't have real problems with me in 2024 and 2025 until I didn't give him as much attention as he wanted (no one could), and when I banned him. He was trying to regularly harass a specific person he didn't like to stalkerish levels, and I told him that if he was going to harass this guy, he needed to do it somewhere else than mlpol and on the discord, because the hundreds of incessant posts were driving me insane and were stopping regular usage of the website. He openly defied the idea of limiting his posts, so I banned him, and now he has serious issues with me.
Maybe he'll reply to this post with "noooo I've had problems with you for longer than that!" or "That time you outplayed me in politics happened in 2021, not 2018!" or something completely pointless like that. What I don't think he is ever going to do is to get the point. He thinks that being allowed to do things is all about some leger of bad versus good actions. It isn't. It's much simpler than that. There are certain things we need people to not do so we can go about our normal lives, because when you do those things, it stops us. Just stop doing those things. Just stop. We don't care about the past so much because this is an image board and none of this shit matters. What we care about is what happens in the present and the future.
There is absolutely nothing that Ninjas could possibly claim happened in the past that could justify his firm belief that he is entitled to do whatever the hell he wants on this website with no possible limits. He will try to say "oh, other people violated the rules in the past. That means that they can't apply to me in the present!" That's the only thing he could possibly say. That's the only thing he's ever said. Well, that and "I paid server fees in 2018!" And no one is ever going to buy that argument.
There's nothing to hear out from Ninjas, because there is no argument he could make that could have as a conclusion "Ninjas can do anything he wants with no repercussions."
>>10694
>"Ninjas can do anything he wants with no repercussions."
A nigger can do anything he wants with no repercussions.
Amazing how both sentences mirror each other.
>"Ninjas can do anything he wants with no repercussions."
A nigger can do anything he wants with no repercussions.
Amazing how both sentences mirror each other.
>>10696
i can't believe i am saying this but i missed that drama with the Argentinian christer spamming over and over
at least it was an innocent bullshitery
i can't believe i am saying this but i missed that drama with the Argentinian christer spamming over and over
at least it was an innocent bullshitery
Anonymous
No.10698
>>10694
>I've actually met several people like him working in the criminal justice system. At first, when you meet them, they are super happy to talk to you. They are very grateful for listening to them and are if anything, overly thankful. Then incessant communication starts. A dozen phone calls in one day. Dozens upon dozens to hundreds of texts or possibly emails in a short time. Then come the demands, wondering why you haven't done x impossible thing in a ridiculously short period of time. They start to take every bit of inattention personally, and by this time you actually are intentionally ignoring them because they are so annoying. They become personally vindictive against you, and believe that you are working against them. In every one of the few times I have encountered this type of person, I've had to say that I cannot handle them and I need to step back.
Yeah, that describes my experiences with him.
Through college I've heard of similar experiences. For some reason the justice system attracts narcissistic people too, which is a shame because that's the exact opposite of the kind of person who should be working in it.
>It's some kind of mental illness, I assume most closely related to bipolar disorder. I've assumed it to be caused by drug usage, maybe by specific drugs. But really, I don't know.
I think it might actually be Borderline Personality Disorder. People with BPD tend to separate the universe into angels and devils, and also have obsessive mannerisms and fear of abandonment. They also have the neurotic tendency to burn bridges and push away people who try to be close to them, and then act betrayed when the people they pushed away stay away. It used to be classified as a type of schizophrenia, and is sometimes mistaken for narcissism.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iraGmA7-9FA
>The only complaints with any kind of legitimacy he may have are against me from the first quarter of 2018, and those didn't involve him.
They involved me, except I don't really care anymore because it was over 7 freaking years ago.
>He didn't have any real problems with anyone until in 2020
I think he might have; but maybe he just wasn't as open about it back then. Idk what his real issue actually ever was, but he always seemed like he was on some kind of vendetta and making it everyone's problem. He was always trying to manipulate me and rope me into participating in his passive-aggressive "opsec" pseudo-political flame wars with the staff.
>He was trying to regularly harass a specific person he didn't like to stalkerish levels, and I told him that if he was going to harass this guy, he needed to do it somewhere else than mlpol and on the discord, because the hundreds of incessant posts were driving me insane and were stopping regular usage of the website.
He had been doing that for a while before, but it escalated exponentially after I finally blocked him on discord, so he took it up on himself to spam the site and the teatime server just so that he could get to me because I was refusing to communicate with him in PMs (after months of harassment, manipulation and belittling).
>>10697
His spam wasn't nearly as malignant.
>I've actually met several people like him working in the criminal justice system. At first, when you meet them, they are super happy to talk to you. They are very grateful for listening to them and are if anything, overly thankful. Then incessant communication starts. A dozen phone calls in one day. Dozens upon dozens to hundreds of texts or possibly emails in a short time. Then come the demands, wondering why you haven't done x impossible thing in a ridiculously short period of time. They start to take every bit of inattention personally, and by this time you actually are intentionally ignoring them because they are so annoying. They become personally vindictive against you, and believe that you are working against them. In every one of the few times I have encountered this type of person, I've had to say that I cannot handle them and I need to step back.
Yeah, that describes my experiences with him.
Through college I've heard of similar experiences. For some reason the justice system attracts narcissistic people too, which is a shame because that's the exact opposite of the kind of person who should be working in it.
>It's some kind of mental illness, I assume most closely related to bipolar disorder. I've assumed it to be caused by drug usage, maybe by specific drugs. But really, I don't know.
I think it might actually be Borderline Personality Disorder. People with BPD tend to separate the universe into angels and devils, and also have obsessive mannerisms and fear of abandonment. They also have the neurotic tendency to burn bridges and push away people who try to be close to them, and then act betrayed when the people they pushed away stay away. It used to be classified as a type of schizophrenia, and is sometimes mistaken for narcissism.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iraGmA7-9FA
>The only complaints with any kind of legitimacy he may have are against me from the first quarter of 2018, and those didn't involve him.
They involved me, except I don't really care anymore because it was over 7 freaking years ago.
>He didn't have any real problems with anyone until in 2020
I think he might have; but maybe he just wasn't as open about it back then. Idk what his real issue actually ever was, but he always seemed like he was on some kind of vendetta and making it everyone's problem. He was always trying to manipulate me and rope me into participating in his passive-aggressive "opsec" pseudo-political flame wars with the staff.
>He was trying to regularly harass a specific person he didn't like to stalkerish levels, and I told him that if he was going to harass this guy, he needed to do it somewhere else than mlpol and on the discord, because the hundreds of incessant posts were driving me insane and were stopping regular usage of the website.
He had been doing that for a while before, but it escalated exponentially after I finally blocked him on discord, so he took it up on himself to spam the site and the teatime server just so that he could get to me because I was refusing to communicate with him in PMs (after months of harassment, manipulation and belittling).
>>10697
His spam wasn't nearly as malignant.