i dont know about that site. never heard of it, i assume it is even smaller than bitchute
>>291120>Literal e-celeb. and therefore breaking rule 8
Who cares? Is there a point to this thread? Is there a topic you which to discuss regarding that this happened? I'm still very much w2illing to help newfags and think its fun to see new posters on this forum but the more of these low-tier trash threads I see, the more I lean towards the position that newfags are cancer. Plz, put some effort in your threads or just lurk. If you felt that this was absolutely necessary information to share with us, we have this thread >>281344 →
Okay, I can see that it might be hard to really know what a good thread looks like. I'm not saying do not post nor taht you have to read rows upon rows in your OP. What I am saying is that there needs to be some fucking passion in it at least.
Like this thread. What is it about? Is it about redpilling through Omegle? Well, if we were to think about this and if I were to make this thread, then I would have done it like this: First I would have decided which questions I would like the thread to center on. From there I would have expanded upon it. Like, "Do you guys think Omagle is a useful site to use to redpill people on?" "Does it have drawbacks?" "Does it have merits?"
Right, now I'm not even sure what is supposed to be discussed here? Is it that Omegle itself, because of its anonymity makes people talk more freely and thusly, it redpills people more, like chans? Or is the discussion suppose to be about the way this guy acts on Omegle when he speaks to randoms that is intresting and something we could learn from in our own redpilling ways? Or is it that Omegle is a site we should use for redpilling purposes? Also, Op I'm not trying to scare you away. I'm just a bit passionate about this site.
are you aware of those content creators in the picture? have you listened to martinez perspective?
I really enjoy watching him debating leftists. He is openly pro white, pro fascism and destroys leftists in a hilarious manner.
He is representing pol on omegle.
I am not sure how good that content is regarding optics.
>>291182>If you felt that this was absolutely necessary information to share with us, we have this thread >>281344 → →
Or even better, "The Trash Can" >>290994 →
tell me this isnt hilarious
it is not like im posting sargon or fuentes
It's not a question of content or optics, it's a question of "what is this content"? A summary, a quick rundown, even a tl;dr would go a long way. It's obvious you know who he is and what he's about, but for those who dont, please answer the question of "who is this fgt, and why should anyone give 2 fucks"?
Admitting, knowing that bitchute shut him down is probably far more significant than the previous question.
Also, you can respond to more than one post at a time, in case you were wondering.
There are some cool newfegs. Don't get me wrong.>>291185
No, I'm not aware. I might like him. The point is taht threads are about subjects not people. You can refrence people when you're talking about their ideas and sometimes even when its not abosultely necessary either - the mods here aren't gonna come down on your like for some minor slip. But the point is that we do not want to divide this forum into camps of, "you like this guy but I don't so therefore we are enemies." Or Like, "Well, I do like this that you are bringing up but since I don't like the people involved because reasons, I disagree." Or really, just that people stop thinking for themselves and start just becoming parrots to some fag and start to suck some guys balls just becuase he makes some good content. No scyphantic behavior and really, we wanna be our own producers of redpilled content not comsumers. And so on.
The point is not to get obstructed by the person and focus on the ideas presented.
The other point is that your thread lacks any form os topic or a very unclear topic. What are we suppose to do in this thread? Not pat eachothers backs in a big circle jerk I hope because we are all redpilled here or something.
>>291185>are you aware of those content creators in the picture?
I am, and I believe more horsefuckers too.
However, they are eCelebs (aka entertainers) and they don't make policy neither can affect the national daily life. They are good to inject ideas and to stir the NPCs brains, which it helps /our/ cause of course, but again, in the big game they're not relevant, at least for now.
He is the Matador who is trying to red pill people on omegle. He Is pretty offensive, naming the jews, and makes good arguments. Defends whites and shames anti whites. If you are an aryanne kind of /pol/ack you will love his content.
I get that your heart is in the right place dude but this is not a place to shill your fav e-celeb. If you really want to do that, then create a thread on /sp/ that's kinda of what they do there. Except the reverse.
It's smaller and they are calling themselves a freespeech platform.
the reason i post it here is because he is openly natsoc and the stuff he says make them tilt
>>291202>the reason i post it here is because he is openly natsoc
Good. Do you know who also are Natsocs? Denver Broncos >>/sp/
Thanks, your post is appreciated.
I would like to draw your attention, the guys you are shilling are known around here.
mlpol too? the topic of the thread is omegle red pilling which is a recent phenomenon started by catboykami. We can discuss the pros and cons of their respective approaches.
Also Martinez is one of the first channels i know of that got banned from bitchute for wrong think.
All right. That's enough.
compared to martinez who calls for separation, Gypsy basically calls for genocide. Which is poisoning the well. I find gypsies stuff hard to watch at times. he seems to be the most frustrated of the three and he is unnecessarily shitty to well meaning non whites.
martinez and gypsy both said that Ponyboykami inspired them.
It's fine, but in future please put a bit more care in your OPs