/vx/ has been one of more freuently used boards for along time now. The board throws a wide net, attmpting to formally encompass the topics of /v/ and /x/, and informally encompass the concepts and topics of /tg/, /qst/, and arguably /vint/. While the board has seen lots of use in its days, its wide range of topics might also be to its detriment.
For starters, the concept of /vx/ began a continuation of the theme of the April 2017 prank of combined boards being ironically better than their respective parent boards. /vx/ was proposed in response to demand for players who wanted a place to discuss video games and other players who wanted a place to talk about supernatual things, as a means of giving a space for both. The thing is, while ll of the other boards were based on wordplays or jokes on behalf of the 4cuck staff, /vx/ was just kind of based on wanting to fill two niches with just one board. That was fine, as the /v/ and the /x/ posters didn't really get in eachothers way or argue, but they also didn't really interact in any notable way even f they did overlap. Many of th posters appear to stick to their handful of generals. There haven't been any memes that have emerged based on th concept of the usion of /v/ and /x/, or even /tg/ and /x/, as it appears that the concept of mixing fantasy game magic with actual magic isn't as adhesive as originally intended.
Shortly after it was created, /vx/ was coneptually expanded to include all gaming discussion, including /tg/ discussion and /qst/ style pbp roleplay threads. Those are certainly topics that this site benefits from, as all pony altchans have roleplay boards, and roleplay is banned on /mlp/ while ponies are banned everywhere else on 4chan. The roleplay threads take up the overwhelming majority of the boards posts per day, with discarded threads taking the lion's share of the board's catalog. You could even say traditional games and roleplay is the unofficial main topic of /vx/, despite it not being represented in the board's name. /vx/ certainly has a great volume rp posts, but general roleplay discussion has suffered, in part due to being suffocated by the board's other topics: it doesn't help ease of casual rp discussion when you have to first specify that you're talking about fantasy magic over actual magic, and roleplaying games instead of video games. The threads on the board that are aimed towards /tg/-style discussion don't get very many replies. The flags and IDs don't really contribute to those aspects either.
That aside, roleplay definitely has the potential to be a big thing on this site, and I'm certain that we could do better. All the other pony altchans have prolific roleplay boards, and I'm certain /pol/acks have their on unique roleplay ideas too.
Meta-wise, /vx/ is formally-blue (now red) board where posts have both flags and image IDs, similar to /mlpol/. That coflicts with the concept though, because neither /v/ nor /x/ had those components, neither are they necessary for discussion on either board.
Obviously, the inclusion of flags is a nod to /vint/, our sister board. /vint/ was one of the other April 1st 2017 board that everyone liked, being another board that several Anons demanded to have reinstated on 4chins to no avail. "She" was featured in the /mlpol/-tan comic that many of us bonded over in the /qa/ wars as they spilled into [s4s], having met /mlpol/-tan in the darkness of the deleted zone where they encountered the ravenous /z/. The flags were added to sate Anons who wanted to bring /vint/ back, although the board hasn't really satisfied the feel or appearance of the old /vint/, especially since neither /vint/ nor any of the boards it was effectively combined with featured image IDs.
Now, don't get me wrong, /vx/ is my secon favorite board after /mlpol/. I just really think this site could do
>"So what do you propose, faggot?"
I propose that /vx/, with due anticipation and announcement, should be archived in place of other board(s) that better accomodate its many topics. The boards would be separate and based on ideas that mesh together or have cultural sigificance, such as:
>/vint/ ("international vidya"): our sister board which was in high demand for ressurrecion. It already has its wn memes, and even a cute board-tan. Bringing /vint/ back would satisfy the needfor a place to discuss video games (and random pajeeting), while reaffirming this site's committment to 2017 nostalgia. The board should feature flags, but not poster IDs, in spirit of our sister board.
>/kx/ (maybe "weaponized autism"): A dangerously-based idea that was proposed as an alternative to /vx/ as early as 2017. /kx/ would be a radical and mystic hive of schizoposting, and an original hybrid board that 4chins jannies weren't brave enough to create. It would satisfy the want for /x/-tier supernatural discussion and conspiracy theories, while also providing space for this board's currently-untapped potential for gunposting and prepping. The /x/ side of /vx/ wouldn't really suffer at all from being divorced from the /tg/ and /v/ elements, and the big-schizo energy from the /k/ element of the board could serve as a huge bullet-shaped viagra to supercharge the board's discussion and create its own culture. /kx/ would have neither post IDs nor flags, as anonyity is important to it.
>/hp/ (maybe "Horseplay"?): A roleplay board that the bathhouse threads could migrate to and make their own without smothering video games discussion. A roleplay board serves to benefit a community such as ours as it facilitates creation if OCs and other content, which is why other pony altchans give them their own boards. It could also be the place for /tg/ disussion, or CYOAs. /hp/ would have neither flags nor post IDs, as none of its elements (/mlp/, /tg/, or /qst/) have them.
These are ideas I've considered for a while. I wouldn't expect them to be implemented immeditely, but perhaps you guys might take some time to warm up to the idea for the future?
Thoughts?
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
1643832512.jpg (87.4 KB, 833x821, 5E9BD9CEA1EFEE0A27A4B3968B213F17-200101.jpg)
289 replies and 43 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.10491
>>10479
Keep the "settle out of court" option on the table. He might just co-operate, but he needs to face some consequences so this shit doesn't happen again.
Keep the "settle out of court" option on the table. He might just co-operate, but he needs to face some consequences so this shit doesn't happen again.
Anonymous
No.10495
blackmailing , harassment , constant threatening , online bullying etc
these are strong and dangerous illegal behaviours
it is not in his favour
these are strong and dangerous illegal behaviours
it is not in his favour
>>10443
>presence of flags has demonstrated to intimidate non-American posters.
Am bong, I don't get intimidated.
>presence of flags has demonstrated to intimidate non-American posters.
Am bong, I don't get intimidated.
>>10501
Yeah, but other posters do.
Mkogwheel used to post here back in 2017-2018, but it was obvious that it was him because there aren't any other New Zealand posters. That led to people harassing him off-site for drawing Fireaxe.
Yeah, but other posters do.
Mkogwheel used to post here back in 2017-2018, but it was obvious that it was him because there aren't any other New Zealand posters. That led to people harassing him off-site for drawing Fireaxe.
Anonymous
No.10509
>>10498
I've only been on this site a short time compared to the rest of you, but even I can spot a LARPing asshole such as yourself a mile off.
>I killed two dogs!
Well done? That makes you no different from an American cop.
>I can fight!
Anyone that can actually fight, doesn't say that.
>You're all being mean to me!
From my perspective, entirely justified, even without a true understanding of past events. Every thread you've interacted with, that I have observed, you ALWAYS come across as a cunt.
There's shitposting, and then there's being a cunt. The subtle difference.
>>10507
That's a shame. I like Kiwi, good lads. I haven't seen many bong posters here, other than during the 4chan hack.
I've only been on this site a short time compared to the rest of you, but even I can spot a LARPing asshole such as yourself a mile off.
>I killed two dogs!
Well done? That makes you no different from an American cop.
>I can fight!
Anyone that can actually fight, doesn't say that.
>You're all being mean to me!
From my perspective, entirely justified, even without a true understanding of past events. Every thread you've interacted with, that I have observed, you ALWAYS come across as a cunt.
There's shitposting, and then there's being a cunt. The subtle difference.
>>10507
That's a shame. I like Kiwi, good lads. I haven't seen many bong posters here, other than during the 4chan hack.
>>10417
We all are.
>>10418
>Huh, suddenly no one is feeling chatty
Tends to happen after people go to bed. Not everyone wants to stay up all night arguing with you, although Lord knows I've done it enough times.
>If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized, shall I direct the audience to the hidden place?
As usual, nobody but you has any idea what you're hinting at. I don't know what "the hidden place" is supposed to mean. Are you talking about the Hidden Valley? Because they have pretty good salad dressing from the stories I've heard. In any event, >>10427 hits the nail pretty squarely on the head; nobody here gives a rat's ass what your actual problem is anymore, we just want you to stop being a pain. If you can't do that, we'd appreciate it if you would just leave. If you refuse to do either, then there's not much we can do about it besides deleting your posts and banning your proxies, but we will continue to do that for as long as it takes. This is the path you chose, and you have no one to blame but yourself.
>It's Ninjaz, with a z, now, please and thank you.
Fine. In that case, my name is now Zhohn Ellwaye, with a Zh, two Ls, an E, and thousands of additional silent letters that cannot be rendered in the visible spectrum. I also have an imaginary talking cow living in my brain because I'm crazy as hell.
>As to the rest, yes. When I know I'm right and the people I'm arguing with are either A. wrong or B. lazy and stupid, I won't let things go. You don't get to slap me across the face a half-dozen times and are forgiven cuz that's what Jesus would want.
Thank you, this pretty much validates everything I said above. I appreciate you saving me the trouble of typing it all out again. While we're on the subject, let's take a look at some of the obviously quite important issues you've raised over the years, and were clearly in the right about:
<oh no, I was banned for being an asshole; I am mad
<oh no, I was banned again for ban evasion; I am mad
<oh no, my ban-evading posts were deleted because that's what happens to ban-evading posts; let me screencap them and repost them because I am mad
<oh no, my screencaps of my deleted ban-evading posts were themselves deleted because I am still banned and my reposts of banned posts are themselves banworthy; I shall now file 29 pissy appeals about it because I am mad
<oh no, my admin credentials were revoked because I antagonized and berated the person who has the power to revoke them enough times that he actually revoked them; I am mad
<oh no, the guy who blocks out 4 hours of his life once per week to stream free entertainment for everyone is streaming something that I, personally, do not care for; I am mad
<oh no, Patrick Stewart had hair in the 1970s and was cast in roles besides that of Jean Luc Picard; for reasons that no living person on earth besides me could possibly understand, this makes me mad
...and so on. Clearly these are serious issues that merit everyone's full and complete attention.
>Worse, I know how to be here forever, and yes I DO have the time and the wherewithall.
Unfortunately, no one doubts or contests this.
>And yes, when you're being derelict at your job which only amounts to monitoring an anonymous board, I will berate you, however I have to.
This "job" is a volunteer position. Most of us have actual shit going on in our actual lives, and don't have the luxury of sitting in front of a computer 24/7, so we moderate the site as best we can, when and if we have the time. You're welcome.
>>10422
>my position was unassailable, having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point, without recognition.
You bring this up a lot, and talk about it as though you fought in the Battle of the Bulge or something and deserve eternal recognition for it. As >>10427 points out, everyone currently on staff has chipped in for hosting fees at one time or another. I myself paid it for a year once. We're not even talking about huge sums of money here; our hosting fees cost about as much as a gym membership. Depending on an individual's situation it may or may not be a lot to pay up front, but in the grand scheme of things it's not a huge sacrifice. If you think that writing a couple of small checks back in the old days somehow balances out all of the insane shit you've pulled since then, you're even crazier than I thought.
>It's almost like you felt that monitoring the site was a privilege and not a duty.
It's neither. It's a volunteer position that could be done by literally anyone, the people on staff are just the ones who volunteered. The site doesn't even require that much moderation to begin with, it's basically just a matter of cleaning up spam when it appears and dealing with the occasional problem user. Now that you're no longer on staff, it's actually a much easier job, btw. The tripartite admin system we tried was stupid and unnecessary; turns out that "not having Ninjaz on staff at all" is a much easier solution. Since you've been gone, there's been basically no infighting or drama. What few disagreements do pop up are settled quickly and calmly.
>>10444
>What blackmail? And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
>No it's not a fucking threat you mongoloid.
The problem is that nobody can tell what's serious and what's hyperbole with you, because most of the time you make no sense and come across as an unhinged, potentially dangerous lunatic. As I understand it, whether or not a threat can be legally treated as serious hinges on whether the person is capable of carrying it out. When you're hinting at actual violent actions taking place at a real event that both you and the person you're yelling at are planning to attend, it's a bit more serious than just two anons in different states talking about bitch-slapping each other from behind computer screens.
We all are.
>>10418
>Huh, suddenly no one is feeling chatty
Tends to happen after people go to bed. Not everyone wants to stay up all night arguing with you, although Lord knows I've done it enough times.
>If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized, shall I direct the audience to the hidden place?
As usual, nobody but you has any idea what you're hinting at. I don't know what "the hidden place" is supposed to mean. Are you talking about the Hidden Valley? Because they have pretty good salad dressing from the stories I've heard. In any event, >>10427 hits the nail pretty squarely on the head; nobody here gives a rat's ass what your actual problem is anymore, we just want you to stop being a pain. If you can't do that, we'd appreciate it if you would just leave. If you refuse to do either, then there's not much we can do about it besides deleting your posts and banning your proxies, but we will continue to do that for as long as it takes. This is the path you chose, and you have no one to blame but yourself.
>It's Ninjaz, with a z, now, please and thank you.
Fine. In that case, my name is now Zhohn Ellwaye, with a Zh, two Ls, an E, and thousands of additional silent letters that cannot be rendered in the visible spectrum. I also have an imaginary talking cow living in my brain because I'm crazy as hell.
>As to the rest, yes. When I know I'm right and the people I'm arguing with are either A. wrong or B. lazy and stupid, I won't let things go. You don't get to slap me across the face a half-dozen times and are forgiven cuz that's what Jesus would want.
Thank you, this pretty much validates everything I said above. I appreciate you saving me the trouble of typing it all out again. While we're on the subject, let's take a look at some of the obviously quite important issues you've raised over the years, and were clearly in the right about:
<oh no, I was banned for being an asshole; I am mad
<oh no, I was banned again for ban evasion; I am mad
<oh no, my ban-evading posts were deleted because that's what happens to ban-evading posts; let me screencap them and repost them because I am mad
<oh no, my screencaps of my deleted ban-evading posts were themselves deleted because I am still banned and my reposts of banned posts are themselves banworthy; I shall now file 29 pissy appeals about it because I am mad
<oh no, my admin credentials were revoked because I antagonized and berated the person who has the power to revoke them enough times that he actually revoked them; I am mad
<oh no, the guy who blocks out 4 hours of his life once per week to stream free entertainment for everyone is streaming something that I, personally, do not care for; I am mad
<oh no, Patrick Stewart had hair in the 1970s and was cast in roles besides that of Jean Luc Picard; for reasons that no living person on earth besides me could possibly understand, this makes me mad
...and so on. Clearly these are serious issues that merit everyone's full and complete attention.
>Worse, I know how to be here forever, and yes I DO have the time and the wherewithall.
Unfortunately, no one doubts or contests this.
>And yes, when you're being derelict at your job which only amounts to monitoring an anonymous board, I will berate you, however I have to.
This "job" is a volunteer position. Most of us have actual shit going on in our actual lives, and don't have the luxury of sitting in front of a computer 24/7, so we moderate the site as best we can, when and if we have the time. You're welcome.
>>10422
>my position was unassailable, having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point, without recognition.
You bring this up a lot, and talk about it as though you fought in the Battle of the Bulge or something and deserve eternal recognition for it. As >>10427 points out, everyone currently on staff has chipped in for hosting fees at one time or another. I myself paid it for a year once. We're not even talking about huge sums of money here; our hosting fees cost about as much as a gym membership. Depending on an individual's situation it may or may not be a lot to pay up front, but in the grand scheme of things it's not a huge sacrifice. If you think that writing a couple of small checks back in the old days somehow balances out all of the insane shit you've pulled since then, you're even crazier than I thought.
>It's almost like you felt that monitoring the site was a privilege and not a duty.
It's neither. It's a volunteer position that could be done by literally anyone, the people on staff are just the ones who volunteered. The site doesn't even require that much moderation to begin with, it's basically just a matter of cleaning up spam when it appears and dealing with the occasional problem user. Now that you're no longer on staff, it's actually a much easier job, btw. The tripartite admin system we tried was stupid and unnecessary; turns out that "not having Ninjaz on staff at all" is a much easier solution. Since you've been gone, there's been basically no infighting or drama. What few disagreements do pop up are settled quickly and calmly.
>>10444
>What blackmail? And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
>No it's not a fucking threat you mongoloid.
The problem is that nobody can tell what's serious and what's hyperbole with you, because most of the time you make no sense and come across as an unhinged, potentially dangerous lunatic. As I understand it, whether or not a threat can be legally treated as serious hinges on whether the person is capable of carrying it out. When you're hinting at actual violent actions taking place at a real event that both you and the person you're yelling at are planning to attend, it's a bit more serious than just two anons in different states talking about bitch-slapping each other from behind computer screens.
Anonymous
No.10527
1754867166.gif (3.2 MB, 498x280, Shotgun to the head of a gormless cunt.gif)
Anonymous
No.10528
>>10515
>vid
as i said no hurt feeling
--
due respect ,idk why are you explaining all of that to me , i just wrote that as a way of saying unban me pwease , i was no looking for an answer , but still thanks for the unban
>Like, what exactly did you expect by posting a detractor post in a thread where a known ban evader is routinely posting his own detracting-posts?
i was just shitting on that guy for his edgelord bullshitism
it is not detracting when the person behaviour is obviously oblivious
>everyone knows who i am
i don't , unless you're lotus
>is Ni**** serious about killing dogs?
i don't understand the censoring of nigger but i hope he was not serious
--
anyway sorry if i was a bit unserious about all of this drama only because i am just an outsider , i am totally sure it has been painful for all of yall to dealing with all of this unwanted mind migraine, i just hate people who take themselves tooooooo seriously like ninja and boomer
life will be more peaceful if people just not trying to create random unnecessarily conflict/drama
>vid
as i said no hurt feeling
--
due respect ,idk why are you explaining all of that to me , i just wrote that as a way of saying unban me pwease , i was no looking for an answer , but still thanks for the unban
>Like, what exactly did you expect by posting a detractor post in a thread where a known ban evader is routinely posting his own detracting-posts?
i was just shitting on that guy for his edgelord bullshitism
it is not detracting when the person behaviour is obviously oblivious
>everyone knows who i am
i don't , unless you're lotus
>is Ni**** serious about killing dogs?
i don't understand the censoring of nigger but i hope he was not serious
--
anyway sorry if i was a bit unserious about all of this drama only because i am just an outsider , i am totally sure it has been painful for all of yall to dealing with all of this unwanted mind migraine, i just hate people who take themselves tooooooo seriously like ninja and boomer
life will be more peaceful if people just not trying to create random unnecessarily conflict/drama
Anonymous
No.10529
>>10515
okay i feel like an asshole , you wrote all of that and i don't know how respond...
sorry
okay i feel like an asshole , you wrote all of that and i don't know how respond...
sorry
>>10535
>disingenuous nigger
>your bullshit
>I btfo your position
Confrontational communication is fine for a while, but in your case is a constant and put anons off. You are going to get ignored even moar as any reasonable anon gets fatigued of your crap.
It looks like your problem is having too much time to waste. Get a job.
>disingenuous nigger
>your bullshit
>I btfo your position
Confrontational communication is fine for a while, but in your case is a constant and put anons off. You are going to get ignored even moar as any reasonable anon gets fatigued of your crap.
It looks like your problem is having too much time to waste. Get a job.
Anonymous
No.10539
>>10534
Your posts are being deleted because you are banned.
>>10535
>We'll get to the rest of your bullshit when I'm confident you aren't going to delete the part
That will never happen, because you are permanently banned.
>>10536
This.
Everypony is sick of him.
>>10537
>the bare minimum of what is expects
Bare minimum for moderation is to ban spammers like you.
>I'm a full-time NEET now.
Cool. So you're a loser AND a parasite.
Most people prefer to keep that to themselves.
>I'm disabled.
So am I. It doesn't stop me from being a productive member of society.
>I'm sure you will want to tell your friends and family. ^_^
You are not important. Nobody cares to tell your son story.
Your posts are being deleted because you are banned.
>>10535
>We'll get to the rest of your bullshit when I'm confident you aren't going to delete the part
That will never happen, because you are permanently banned.
>>10536
This.
Everypony is sick of him.
>>10537
>the bare minimum of what is expects
Bare minimum for moderation is to ban spammers like you.
>I'm a full-time NEET now.
Cool. So you're a loser AND a parasite.
Most people prefer to keep that to themselves.
>I'm disabled.
So am I. It doesn't stop me from being a productive member of society.
>I'm sure you will want to tell your friends and family. ^_^
You are not important. Nobody cares to tell your son story.
Anonymous
No.10541
>>10540
>No u!
If I spam, I will get banned. You are spamming now.
>Yes, you know all about everypony being sick of someone. Bet you're thrilled it's not you anymore. ^_~
Idk what this is even supposed to mean. You are delusional.
>If having spent 30 years carrying several businesses to the point of back-breaking is "a loser and a parasite"
Look where you ended up. Mentally ill, pathetic, and unable to even care for yourself. And on top of that you spend your free time spamming chansites. You are a living parody of a human being.
>No u!
If I spam, I will get banned. You are spamming now.
>Yes, you know all about everypony being sick of someone. Bet you're thrilled it's not you anymore. ^_~
Idk what this is even supposed to mean. You are delusional.
>If having spent 30 years carrying several businesses to the point of back-breaking is "a loser and a parasite"
Look where you ended up. Mentally ill, pathetic, and unable to even care for yourself. And on top of that you spend your free time spamming chansites. You are a living parody of a human being.
Anonymous
No.10543
>>10542
>protected
Ban evasion is not protected
>that's why you felt compelled to respond
This is rich coming from an unemployed faggot who does nothing but spam the site all day.
>insufferably malicious
What, did I hit a nerve? I'm simply describing what you are. I guess the truth hurts.
>I'm doing SOMETHING right
Your behavior has only gotten worse and worse over time. I wouldn't be surprised if you trooned out in the end.
>a tale of triumph
Ah, yes, an unemployed faggot who spends his days spamming an image board. The spitting image of triumph.
>My situation is permanent and hard-won.
You are unemployed.
Unless you raised an exorbitant amount of money in youth, it's safe to assume that you're a taxpayer-funded welfare baby that the government deemed to be too retarded to care for yourself, or you're living off of your family members
Parasite, either way.
>What have you earned?
I just finally pulled myself out of medical debt, and I'm getting a job in my field. I think I'm doing well.
>protected
Ban evasion is not protected
>that's why you felt compelled to respond
This is rich coming from an unemployed faggot who does nothing but spam the site all day.
>insufferably malicious
What, did I hit a nerve? I'm simply describing what you are. I guess the truth hurts.
>I'm doing SOMETHING right
Your behavior has only gotten worse and worse over time. I wouldn't be surprised if you trooned out in the end.
>a tale of triumph
Ah, yes, an unemployed faggot who spends his days spamming an image board. The spitting image of triumph.
>My situation is permanent and hard-won.
You are unemployed.
Unless you raised an exorbitant amount of money in youth, it's safe to assume that you're a taxpayer-funded welfare baby that the government deemed to be too retarded to care for yourself, or you're living off of your family members
Parasite, either way.
>What have you earned?
I just finally pulled myself out of medical debt, and I'm getting a job in my field. I think I'm doing well.
Anonymous
No.10545
>>10544
>BTW, the "sekret place" is /Test/
Okay. Go post there instead.
>BTW, the "sekret place" is /Test/
Okay. Go post there instead.
Anonymous
No.10548
>>10544
>For you ignoramuses in the audiences, this is an extended effort to convey contempt,
Get a boyfriend, or a dildo.
>For you ignoramuses in the audiences, this is an extended effort to convey contempt,
Get a boyfriend, or a dildo.
>>10544
Could some janny think of the poners and erase this post?
Ninjas is a saboteur now.
Could some janny think of the poners and erase this post?
Ninjas is a saboteur now.
Anonymous
No.10550
>>10549
This, please.
Jannies can go ahead and scrub my replies too. It was wrong of me to give him attention.
This, please.
Jannies can go ahead and scrub my replies too. It was wrong of me to give him attention.
Anonymous
No.10552
>>10551
Also this post.
Also this post.
>>(You)
>/Test/
Are you seriously still on about that? Yes, we have a test board. We've always had a /test/ board. Most sites have one, it's where you test things. 4chan has one, only theirs is private and you need mod credentials to log in to it. No, we've never listed our /test/ board publicly because why in the hell would we? You've gone off about this numerous times, and I've never understood your obsession the subject. You act like it's some huge secret we've been keeping.
So yes, for anyone who is interested in seeing a bunch meaningless posts staff have made testing various functions on the site, here is our super-sekrit hidden Test board:
https://mlpol.net/Test
>Much/most of this discussion could have occurred in my /sp/ thread by the way.
Do you mean the game thread you specifically asked me if you could start, and I said go ahead and start a game thread if you want, and then instead of starting a game thread, you kept on picking silly fights over silly bullshit in the old thread until you got yourself banned? Is that the thread you mean?
Anyway, whatever. Keep ban-evading, and we'll keep banning you and deleting your posts I guess. If this is how you choose to spend your time, there's not a whole lot anyone can do about it. I hope you're having fun.
>/Test/
Are you seriously still on about that? Yes, we have a test board. We've always had a /test/ board. Most sites have one, it's where you test things. 4chan has one, only theirs is private and you need mod credentials to log in to it. No, we've never listed our /test/ board publicly because why in the hell would we? You've gone off about this numerous times, and I've never understood your obsession the subject. You act like it's some huge secret we've been keeping.
So yes, for anyone who is interested in seeing a bunch meaningless posts staff have made testing various functions on the site, here is our super-sekrit hidden Test board:
https://mlpol.net/Test
>Much/most of this discussion could have occurred in my /sp/ thread by the way.
Do you mean the game thread you specifically asked me if you could start, and I said go ahead and start a game thread if you want, and then instead of starting a game thread, you kept on picking silly fights over silly bullshit in the old thread until you got yourself banned? Is that the thread you mean?
Anyway, whatever. Keep ban-evading, and we'll keep banning you and deleting your posts I guess. If this is how you choose to spend your time, there's not a whole lot anyone can do about it. I hope you're having fun.
>>10554
>sikrit board
to me it only seems like you guys had a secret vip party and had so much fun
--
also those spooder man memes are awesome
>sikrit board
to me it only seems like you guys had a secret vip party and had so much fun
--
also those spooder man memes are awesome
So normally my position is that we don't engage you and just delete everything you post because you have nothing of value to say, but I suppose some small part of me still feels like there's somehow something will get through.
You said something like "respond to false allegations." Nevermind the fact that they aren't false and you've had plenty of time to respond but haven't, you're really missing the point here.
We don't care what happened seven years ago. We don't care what happened four years or six years or whatever ago. This is all pixels on a screen. This isn't the real life. This is a place we go for decent experiences, but what happens here isn't so important that anything is worth holding grudges seven years after the fact. What we care about is what is happening now.
Do you think that if we were so offended with what happened years ago that we would have given you another chance last September, after you had already been banned off of the website? No. We want to move on with our lives and have a pleasant present.
Also, if you didn't know, Pupper has been away from his computer for months now. Even with that kind of restriction, Pupper has been able to add a quick-ban feature for Ban Evasion that lets us ban and delete posts in three clicks. And he'll be able to do much, much more than that to implement entirely new anti-spam features when he gets back in a week.
Good luck. Honestly, it's pretty fun to check mlpol, look for your posts, and delete them, and that's the most fun I've had with you in five years.
You said something like "respond to false allegations." Nevermind the fact that they aren't false and you've had plenty of time to respond but haven't, you're really missing the point here.
We don't care what happened seven years ago. We don't care what happened four years or six years or whatever ago. This is all pixels on a screen. This isn't the real life. This is a place we go for decent experiences, but what happens here isn't so important that anything is worth holding grudges seven years after the fact. What we care about is what is happening now.
Do you think that if we were so offended with what happened years ago that we would have given you another chance last September, after you had already been banned off of the website? No. We want to move on with our lives and have a pleasant present.
Also, if you didn't know, Pupper has been away from his computer for months now. Even with that kind of restriction, Pupper has been able to add a quick-ban feature for Ban Evasion that lets us ban and delete posts in three clicks. And he'll be able to do much, much more than that to implement entirely new anti-spam features when he gets back in a week.
Good luck. Honestly, it's pretty fun to check mlpol, look for your posts, and delete them, and that's the most fun I've had with you in five years.
Anonymous
No.10558
Anonymous
No.10559
>>10557
>This is all pixels on a screen. This isn't the real life.
some people don't have such virtues
>This is all pixels on a screen. This isn't the real life.
some people don't have such virtues
>>10554
>Is that the thread you mean?
I'm talking about the /sp/ thread with the cute pink scene-pony. The game thread became obviously untenable given the disposition of administration and their unwillingness to leave something they don't control alone to happen. I can explain what this means in detail, but you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline.
>I hope you're having fun
I am. It takes me very minimal effort to do this, so I will persist. I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days, but in order for that to happen certain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change. That, or the rules need to.
Seriously, it would be to your credit to make a rule "Don't make Lotus mad". As a new user, I would be impressed by such a rule. Whatever though.
>>10556
>you've had plenty of time to respond
Oh, is this a court of law where I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe? I thought you wanted me to leave. Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
This is the problem with Lotus. No matter what you do, he's going to frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
>we don't care what happened X years ago
No, you WANT people to not care because you know it invalidates your current position, because it paints you in as bad a light as I have painted myself.
Remember when you couldn't stop deleting and editing posts on the board AND the discord? To the point we had to make a second discord cuz you are an absolute control freak? Anyway,....
>that's the most fun I've had with you in five years.
And see, this right here is the one reason I haven't posted of. Because I know you enjoy it. I came back in September to make a number of apologies, a number of explanations, and to play games again with my friends.
One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person who simply would not let it stand that I was having fun and playing games with all the old crew and sought to sabotage my experience, and regrettably he was enabled to. So, I decided to play my own game. It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
>Is that the thread you mean?
I'm talking about the /sp/ thread with the cute pink scene-pony. The game thread became obviously untenable given the disposition of administration and their unwillingness to leave something they don't control alone to happen. I can explain what this means in detail, but you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline.
>I hope you're having fun
I am. It takes me very minimal effort to do this, so I will persist. I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days, but in order for that to happen certain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change. That, or the rules need to.
Seriously, it would be to your credit to make a rule "Don't make Lotus mad". As a new user, I would be impressed by such a rule. Whatever though.
>>10556
>you've had plenty of time to respond
Oh, is this a court of law where I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe? I thought you wanted me to leave. Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
This is the problem with Lotus. No matter what you do, he's going to frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
>we don't care what happened X years ago
No, you WANT people to not care because you know it invalidates your current position, because it paints you in as bad a light as I have painted myself.
Remember when you couldn't stop deleting and editing posts on the board AND the discord? To the point we had to make a second discord cuz you are an absolute control freak? Anyway,....
>that's the most fun I've had with you in five years.
And see, this right here is the one reason I haven't posted of. Because I know you enjoy it. I came back in September to make a number of apologies, a number of explanations, and to play games again with my friends.
One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person who simply would not let it stand that I was having fun and playing games with all the old crew and sought to sabotage my experience, and regrettably he was enabled to. So, I decided to play my own game. It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
>>10560
>you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline
We don't appreciate any of your posts, so decline those as well.
>I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days
You don't act like it. You only get worse overtime.
>what is permissible to post
You are banned for spamming, threats, derailment, harassment, and ban evasion. None of these things should be permissible.
And nobody cares enough about you to change the rules to make you more comfortable. You don't own this site. You are banned from this site.
>I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe?
You spend plenty of time posting anyway.
>I thought you wanted me to leave.
We do, leave.
>Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
We told you never to come back, not "take a break".
>frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
You are in the wrong.
You a a ban-evading, spamming, threatening, criminal, attention-seeking, terminally-online annoyance.
>when he knows he's wrong.
He is not wrong for banning you for the above reasons, and your subsequent behavior affirms that.
>No, you WANT people to not care
You are the only person who cares.
>with my friends
We are not friends. You burned every bridge long before that. You harassed, belittled, insulted and drove away everyone around you, to the point that nobody wants to interact with you.
>It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
Nobody appreciates it. Your effort is wasted.
But I guess a lowlife welfare parasite like you doesn't care about things like productivity, fulfillment or time management.
>you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad, so I'll decline
We don't appreciate any of your posts, so decline those as well.
>I do miss the days when we all got along, and would like it if we got back to those days
You don't act like it. You only get worse overtime.
>what is permissible to post
You are banned for spamming, threats, derailment, harassment, and ban evasion. None of these things should be permissible.
And nobody cares enough about you to change the rules to make you more comfortable. You don't own this site. You are banned from this site.
>I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe?
You spend plenty of time posting anyway.
>I thought you wanted me to leave.
We do, leave.
>Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
We told you never to come back, not "take a break".
>frame it like you're wrong and he's very good at distracting from the point when he knows he's wrong.
You are in the wrong.
You a a ban-evading, spamming, threatening, criminal, attention-seeking, terminally-online annoyance.
>when he knows he's wrong.
He is not wrong for banning you for the above reasons, and your subsequent behavior affirms that.
>No, you WANT people to not care
You are the only person who cares.
>with my friends
We are not friends. You burned every bridge long before that. You harassed, belittled, insulted and drove away everyone around you, to the point that nobody wants to interact with you.
>It seems to be one that enough people are enjoying that I think I'll keep playing.
Nobody appreciates it. Your effort is wasted.
But I guess a lowlife welfare parasite like you doesn't care about things like productivity, fulfillment or time management.
1755116992.png (1.5 MB, 1024x1024, d7c857c6-caa0-445a-a7df-c69c4061a2b4.png)
>>10562
>We don't appreciate any of your posts, so decline those as well.
That advice will do well, given my track-record of doing what (you) think I should. these fucking wankers
>You don't act like it. You only get worse overtime.
And you think I'm the only one? SON! Let me tell you!
>You are banned for spamming, threats, derailment, harassment, and ban evasion. None of these things should be permissible.
No, I was banned for not violating the rules. It was only after that that I decided "Oh, there's no actual rules? Well if there's no ACTUAL rules,...."
>And nobody cares enough about you to change the rules to make you more comfortable. You don't own this site. You are banned from this site.
A good thing I don't care if I'm banned or whatever then, isn't it. SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
>You spend plenty of time posting anyway.
Was that supposed to be a point? Objection, immaterial
>We do, leave.
Did you think of that, or was that just residual brain-washing?
>We told you never to come back, not "take a break".
Oh, it's "we" now? How cute. How things change.
>You are in the wrong.
Needs work. Practice it in the mirror before next time. Use a double-mirror (sometimes called a True mirror, where 2 mirrors are placed perpendicular so you can accurately observe your body-language)
>You are the only person who cares.
Clearly. The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me. Maybe that's a lesson you haven't learned with
>We are not friends. You burned every bridge long before that. You harassed, belittled, insulted and drove away everyone around you, to the point that nobody wants to interact with you.
I did. Long after Lotus, and (you) specifically did. Shall we go into the lengthy and drawn out dramas (plural) that you wrought because it was funny to you at the time?
>Nobody appreciates it. Your effort is wasted.
Well, you're talking to the wrong audience. ^_~
>But I guess a lowlife welfare parasite like you doesn't care about things like productivity, fulfillment or time management.
Ha! Rich and tasty! Alas, still lacking in an understanding of flavor-balance and control. Too much salt and acid, and not enough appreciation to the sweet, savory, and umami aspects. 4/10, not credible.
But seriously, if you wanna take shots at me at LEAST do it in the /sp/ thread. /qa/ has had enough of this
>We don't appreciate any of your posts, so decline those as well.
That advice will do well, given my track-record of doing what (you) think I should. these fucking wankers
>You don't act like it. You only get worse overtime.
And you think I'm the only one? SON! Let me tell you!
>You are banned for spamming, threats, derailment, harassment, and ban evasion. None of these things should be permissible.
No, I was banned for not violating the rules. It was only after that that I decided "Oh, there's no actual rules? Well if there's no ACTUAL rules,...."
>And nobody cares enough about you to change the rules to make you more comfortable. You don't own this site. You are banned from this site.
A good thing I don't care if I'm banned or whatever then, isn't it. SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
>You spend plenty of time posting anyway.
Was that supposed to be a point? Objection, immaterial
>We do, leave.
Did you think of that, or was that just residual brain-washing?
>We told you never to come back, not "take a break".
Oh, it's "we" now? How cute. How things change.
>You are in the wrong.
Needs work. Practice it in the mirror before next time. Use a double-mirror (sometimes called a True mirror, where 2 mirrors are placed perpendicular so you can accurately observe your body-language)
>You are the only person who cares.
Clearly. The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me. Maybe that's a lesson you haven't learned with
>We are not friends. You burned every bridge long before that. You harassed, belittled, insulted and drove away everyone around you, to the point that nobody wants to interact with you.
I did. Long after Lotus, and (you) specifically did. Shall we go into the lengthy and drawn out dramas (plural) that you wrought because it was funny to you at the time?
>Nobody appreciates it. Your effort is wasted.
Well, you're talking to the wrong audience. ^_~
>But I guess a lowlife welfare parasite like you doesn't care about things like productivity, fulfillment or time management.
Ha! Rich and tasty! Alas, still lacking in an understanding of flavor-balance and control. Too much salt and acid, and not enough appreciation to the sweet, savory, and umami aspects. 4/10, not credible.
But seriously, if you wanna take shots at me at LEAST do it in the /sp/ thread. /qa/ has had enough of this
>>10563
>And you think I'm the only one?
Your perceived victimhood doesn't excuse your behavior.
>It was only after that that I decided
You have since been banned again.
>Oh, there's no actual rules? Well if there's no ACTUAL rules,....
The rules are fine. You're just do delusional you think they don't apply to you.
And that doesn't excuse spamming, harassment, threats and derailing.
>SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
No, nobody has to hold anything. Your self-important delusions are meaningless.
>Did you think of that
Yes. Leave.
>Practice it in the mirror...
More delusions.
>The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me.
Lol, lmao even.
The queer, spamming, mentally-ill, degenerate who's too retarded to hold a job thinks his thoughts are valuable.
>lengthy and drawn out dramas
Nobody cares.
>Well, you're talking to the wrong audience. ^_~
So are you. Nobody cares.
>4/10, not credible
Am I wrong? Are you not a welfare parasite? Correct me if I am mistaken.
>And you think I'm the only one?
Your perceived victimhood doesn't excuse your behavior.
>It was only after that that I decided
You have since been banned again.
>Oh, there's no actual rules? Well if there's no ACTUAL rules,....
The rules are fine. You're just do delusional you think they don't apply to you.
And that doesn't excuse spamming, harassment, threats and derailing.
>SOMEONE has to hold the torch.
No, nobody has to hold anything. Your self-important delusions are meaningless.
>Did you think of that
Yes. Leave.
>Practice it in the mirror...
More delusions.
>The intellectual integrity of the site is important to me.
Lol, lmao even.
The queer, spamming, mentally-ill, degenerate who's too retarded to hold a job thinks his thoughts are valuable.
>lengthy and drawn out dramas
Nobody cares.
>Well, you're talking to the wrong audience. ^_~
So are you. Nobody cares.
>4/10, not credible
Am I wrong? Are you not a welfare parasite? Correct me if I am mistaken.
>>10564
>Your perceived victimhood doesn't excuse your behavior.
If only you realized how ironic this statement is
>You have since been banned again.
I'd guess I have more bans than KYSfilly by this point
>The rules are fine. You're just do delusional you think they don't apply to you. And that doesn't excuse spamming, harassment, threats and derailing.
Spelling mistakes aside, low-hanging fruit no. I think the rules apply to everyone. That means you, that means me, that means him. And when they don't, yes, respect is lost.
>Yes. Leave.
<You're at 23% of this method working. It will only take 647 more tries before it's successful
>More delusions
YOU'RE the one who thought that would work
>queer
Uh, citation? I'm genuinely curious, cuz this is news to me.
>too retarded to hold a job
Here's hoping you never become disabled for doing an ACTUAL job
>So are you. Nobody cares
And yet, that's not what I'm hearing
>Are you not a welfare parasite?
No, welfare parasites don't spend ~30 years paying into social security AND enabling hard-working people to get all manner of bonuses and benefits before they broke their back doing what they were told. This is in industry, not the bitch-fist genre (I won't say it) you picked.
>Your perceived victimhood doesn't excuse your behavior.
If only you realized how ironic this statement is
>You have since been banned again.
I'd guess I have more bans than KYSfilly by this point
>The rules are fine. You're just do delusional you think they don't apply to you. And that doesn't excuse spamming, harassment, threats and derailing.
Spelling mistakes aside, low-hanging fruit no. I think the rules apply to everyone. That means you, that means me, that means him. And when they don't, yes, respect is lost.
>Yes. Leave.
<You're at 23% of this method working. It will only take 647 more tries before it's successful
>More delusions
YOU'RE the one who thought that would work
>queer
Uh, citation? I'm genuinely curious, cuz this is news to me.
>too retarded to hold a job
Here's hoping you never become disabled for doing an ACTUAL job
>So are you. Nobody cares
And yet, that's not what I'm hearing
>Are you not a welfare parasite?
No, welfare parasites don't spend ~30 years paying into social security AND enabling hard-working people to get all manner of bonuses and benefits before they broke their back doing what they were told. This is in industry, not the bitch-fist genre (I won't say it) you picked.
>>10560
>you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad
Sure, it's totally that and not because you have displayed an unwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>It takes me very minimal effort to do this, so I will persist
And less effort to ban you. Three clicks per post
>I do miss the days when we all got along
I don't believe you
>ertain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change
We're not going to let you intentionally disrupt threads. We're not going to let you harass a specific user you don't like. We're not going to let you make cryptic posts that sound like threats. You are not above the rules and we will not change that for you.
>Seriously, it would be to your credit to make a rule "Don't make Lotus mad"
We have a rule against intentional disruption and thread derailment. You repeatedly disrupted a thread over several months and were told to stop. The specific post you were initially banned for was a post where you promised to disrupt the thread indefinitely until some kind of demand was met. You were banned for that for what was intended to be a month. Your behavior since then has been absolutely horrendous and that is why it was extended.
>I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe?
You've had many opportunities to say your piece and you haven't.
>I thought you wanted me to leave
Yes
>Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
>it invalidates your current position
Do you think it validates yours?
Minor shit from seven years ago neither invalidates the position of anyone who thinks your recent behavior has been unacceptable nor does it justify your behavior.
>As a new user
As someone who should know better than to believe that the rules do not apply to him
>as bad a light as I have painted myself.
How does this help you?
>I came back in September to make a number of apologies, a number of explanations, and to play games again with my friends.
And I thought you were serious. Instead you immediately became vitriolic towards me because I was at a Mexican restaurant with family during a time you wanted attention, and because you didn't get precisely the result from a dice roll you wanted. You borderline stalked another player and caused problems for everyone. You would hold grudges over minor shit that didn't matter and would bring it up months later. You were not acting like a friend at all.
>One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person
If you are talking about me I don't think so?, I went out of my way to be nice and to not be riled when you'd send me hateful messages over things like dice rolls. If you're talking about the other guy: Yes, he did on more than one occassion, And it pissed me off, and I told him to stop. But you definitely didn't deescalate things, and blew what actions were taken out of proportion. Both of you should have just gotten the fuck over it and moved on.
>So, I decided to play my own game.
If you think it's good now, just wait until Pupper gets involved next week and we can modify the site code.
>That advice will do well, given my track-record of doing what (you) think I should
Why bother even saying this?
>No, I was banned for not violating the rules.
Technically, you were banned for promising to break rules into perpetuity.
>I decided "Oh, there's no actual rules?
This pretty well hits the nail on the head. You think that no rules apply to you. And I suppose I didn't help by not banning you earlier when you were breaking the rules, but gave leniency.
As Elway said, we just need you to stop being a pain, whether its by you not acting like an asshole, you leaving, or your posts being banned and deleted.
>A good thing I don't care if I'm banned or whatever then
soyboycryingunderamask.jpeg
>Oh, it's "we" now?
It actually is though Several people.
>>10565
>Here's hoping you never become disabled for doing an ACTUAL job
You told me that you had a job lined up at a restaurant to work as a cook, then your roommate qualified for Veterans benefits, and you figured you could live off of his pension so you quit that job.
You are perfectly able to work.
>you lot have displayed a lack of appreciation for lengthy descriptions that make you look bad
Sure, it's totally that and not because you have displayed an unwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>It takes me very minimal effort to do this, so I will persist
And less effort to ban you. Three clicks per post
>I do miss the days when we all got along
I don't believe you
>ertain attitudes about what is permissible to post will need to change
We're not going to let you intentionally disrupt threads. We're not going to let you harass a specific user you don't like. We're not going to let you make cryptic posts that sound like threats. You are not above the rules and we will not change that for you.
>Seriously, it would be to your credit to make a rule "Don't make Lotus mad"
We have a rule against intentional disruption and thread derailment. You repeatedly disrupted a thread over several months and were told to stop. The specific post you were initially banned for was a post where you promised to disrupt the thread indefinitely until some kind of demand was met. You were banned for that for what was intended to be a month. Your behavior since then has been absolutely horrendous and that is why it was extended.
>I'm forced to respond in a certain timeframe?
You've had many opportunities to say your piece and you haven't.
>I thought you wanted me to leave
Yes
>Sorry that I took your advice for a day or so.
As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
>it invalidates your current position
Do you think it validates yours?
Minor shit from seven years ago neither invalidates the position of anyone who thinks your recent behavior has been unacceptable nor does it justify your behavior.
>As a new user
As someone who should know better than to believe that the rules do not apply to him
>as bad a light as I have painted myself.
How does this help you?
>I came back in September to make a number of apologies, a number of explanations, and to play games again with my friends.
And I thought you were serious. Instead you immediately became vitriolic towards me because I was at a Mexican restaurant with family during a time you wanted attention, and because you didn't get precisely the result from a dice roll you wanted. You borderline stalked another player and caused problems for everyone. You would hold grudges over minor shit that didn't matter and would bring it up months later. You were not acting like a friend at all.
>One of my friends proved to be a very nasty and spiteful person
If you are talking about me I don't think so?, I went out of my way to be nice and to not be riled when you'd send me hateful messages over things like dice rolls. If you're talking about the other guy: Yes, he did on more than one occassion, And it pissed me off, and I told him to stop. But you definitely didn't deescalate things, and blew what actions were taken out of proportion. Both of you should have just gotten the fuck over it and moved on.
>So, I decided to play my own game.
If you think it's good now, just wait until Pupper gets involved next week and we can modify the site code.
>That advice will do well, given my track-record of doing what (you) think I should
Why bother even saying this?
>No, I was banned for not violating the rules.
Technically, you were banned for promising to break rules into perpetuity.
>I decided "Oh, there's no actual rules?
This pretty well hits the nail on the head. You think that no rules apply to you. And I suppose I didn't help by not banning you earlier when you were breaking the rules, but gave leniency.
As Elway said, we just need you to stop being a pain, whether its by you not acting like an asshole, you leaving, or your posts being banned and deleted.
>A good thing I don't care if I'm banned or whatever then
soyboycryingunderamask.jpeg
>Oh, it's "we" now?
It actually is though Several people.
>>10565
>Here's hoping you never become disabled for doing an ACTUAL job
You told me that you had a job lined up at a restaurant to work as a cook, then your roommate qualified for Veterans benefits, and you figured you could live off of his pension so you quit that job.
You are perfectly able to work.
>>10566
Huhuhuh
I've been trying for years to engage in reasonable discussion. What you're witnessing is the result of a gradual escalation from the UNwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>And less effort to ban you. Three clicks per post
And nothing of value was lost
>We have a rule against intentional disruption and thread derailment. You repeatedly disrupted a thread over several months and were told to stop. The specific post you were initially banned for was a post where you promised to disrupt the thread indefinitely until some kind of demand was met. You were banned for that for what was intended to be a month. Your behavior since then has been absolutely horrendous and that is why it was extended.
Uh, who's this We? Because he (admin) has broken all these rules, as have a number of others.
>You've had many opportunities to say your piece and you haven't.
The FUCK I haven't, every time I tried I get banned, deleted, etc. You're just an idiot, or uniniformed.
>As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
How about neither
>Do you think it validates yours? Minor shit
Oh, right. So, when the current and sitting Admin displays far worse (by the rules, the actual rules not the "I decide the rules" rules) behavior and gets a pass - advocated by me and others - it's fine, but when I do less egregious shit, it's the worst thing ever and I should be ashamed. Okay, that tracks.
>As someone who should know better than to believe that the rules do not apply to him
IDEK what that was supposed to mean, but yes. If I was a new user and I saw "Don't fuck with Admin" as a rule, I would tread carefully. Just being honest.
>How does this help you?
NGL, you made me pause and giggle on this one. Do you base all your decisions on what will bring you benefit? Better question, do you base ANY of your decisions on PRINCIPLE?
>And I thought you were serious
And I thought YOU were! You think I knew or cared what restaurant you were at? Put your fucking phone down, you idiot!
>If you're talking about the other guy: Yes, he did on more than one occassion
HOSHANNA! FOREVER!
Nothing was done of course, which is why we find ourselves here today. Again, maybe if I had erp'd with GM more
>just wait until Pupper
Oh, I expect to be the reason Pupper tightens the proverbial bolts
>Technically, you were banned for promising to break rules into perpetuity.
False. I was banned for being a dick about how ponies are furry. They are btw, but let's move on from there. That was the point where I began to ban evade, because the cause/justification for the ban was bullshit. Since then, I have admittedly become increasingly dismissive of the rules, as it has become increasingly apparent that there are no actual rules, there's simply the enforcement actions that staff does and doesn't want.
Again, this isn't critical, but if this is to be the policy (and it's an adviseable one) than make it so; quit this "you're not following the bullshit rules we have now" nonsense.
>we just need you to stop being a pain
And Elway and staff need to stop putting their dick between their legs and expecting to be catered to on the internet. When all this (Mlpol) began they had a pair of testicles and could tolerate a bit of counter-play, but NOW? Bunch of fucking nancies who expect to have a comfy time of it. Shameful.
>You told me that you had a job lined up at a restaurant to work as a cook, then your roommate qualified for Veterans benefits, and you figured you could live off of his pension so you quit that job.
>You are perfectly able to work
Hehehehehehe
Now who's doxxing? Yes, I did work as a cook, and I did rather well. I could have kept at it, but even with restaurant shoes and rubber pads on the floor, I kept tweaking my back. What's more - as I've detailed (and you curiously omitted, but you knew if you knew enough to iterate the previous) 90% of the kitchen staff - including the "head manager" - was illegal immigrants.
Seriously, I hope you never lose your mobility.
Huhuhuh
I've been trying for years to engage in reasonable discussion. What you're witnessing is the result of a gradual escalation from the UNwillingness to engage in reasonable discussion.
>And less effort to ban you. Three clicks per post
And nothing of value was lost
>We have a rule against intentional disruption and thread derailment. You repeatedly disrupted a thread over several months and were told to stop. The specific post you were initially banned for was a post where you promised to disrupt the thread indefinitely until some kind of demand was met. You were banned for that for what was intended to be a month. Your behavior since then has been absolutely horrendous and that is why it was extended.
Uh, who's this We? Because he (admin) has broken all these rules, as have a number of others.
>You've had many opportunities to say your piece and you haven't.
The FUCK I haven't, every time I tried I get banned, deleted, etc. You're just an idiot, or uniniformed.
>As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
How about neither
>Do you think it validates yours? Minor shit
Oh, right. So, when the current and sitting Admin displays far worse (by the rules, the actual rules not the "I decide the rules" rules) behavior and gets a pass - advocated by me and others - it's fine, but when I do less egregious shit, it's the worst thing ever and I should be ashamed. Okay, that tracks.
>As someone who should know better than to believe that the rules do not apply to him
IDEK what that was supposed to mean, but yes. If I was a new user and I saw "Don't fuck with Admin" as a rule, I would tread carefully. Just being honest.
>How does this help you?
NGL, you made me pause and giggle on this one. Do you base all your decisions on what will bring you benefit? Better question, do you base ANY of your decisions on PRINCIPLE?
>And I thought you were serious
And I thought YOU were! You think I knew or cared what restaurant you were at? Put your fucking phone down, you idiot!
>If you're talking about the other guy: Yes, he did on more than one occassion
HOSHANNA! FOREVER!
Nothing was done of course, which is why we find ourselves here today. Again, maybe if I had erp'd with GM more
>just wait until Pupper
Oh, I expect to be the reason Pupper tightens the proverbial bolts
>Technically, you were banned for promising to break rules into perpetuity.
False. I was banned for being a dick about how ponies are furry. They are btw, but let's move on from there. That was the point where I began to ban evade, because the cause/justification for the ban was bullshit. Since then, I have admittedly become increasingly dismissive of the rules, as it has become increasingly apparent that there are no actual rules, there's simply the enforcement actions that staff does and doesn't want.
Again, this isn't critical, but if this is to be the policy (and it's an adviseable one) than make it so; quit this "you're not following the bullshit rules we have now" nonsense.
>we just need you to stop being a pain
And Elway and staff need to stop putting their dick between their legs and expecting to be catered to on the internet. When all this (Mlpol) began they had a pair of testicles and could tolerate a bit of counter-play, but NOW? Bunch of fucking nancies who expect to have a comfy time of it. Shameful.
>You told me that you had a job lined up at a restaurant to work as a cook, then your roommate qualified for Veterans benefits, and you figured you could live off of his pension so you quit that job.
>You are perfectly able to work
Hehehehehehe
Now who's doxxing? Yes, I did work as a cook, and I did rather well. I could have kept at it, but even with restaurant shoes and rubber pads on the floor, I kept tweaking my back. What's more - as I've detailed (and you curiously omitted, but you knew if you knew enough to iterate the previous) 90% of the kitchen staff - including the "head manager" - was illegal immigrants.
Seriously, I hope you never lose your mobility.
>>10568
I will, actually, but only on the condition that the others apologize for what they have done.
I will, actually, but only on the condition that the others apologize for what they have done.
>>10567
>>As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
>How about neither
>2. Post in good faith, do not derail threads, and do not be massively disruptive of the experience of others.
Bong here. You're being a cunt. Stop it.
>>As Elway said, either stop being a pain, or leave.
>How about neither
>2. Post in good faith, do not derail threads, and do not be massively disruptive of the experience of others.
Bong here. You're being a cunt. Stop it.
>>10575
And what about you suggests sense? Serious question. I know (you) know you, but from what you've posted, you're operating at a deficit if you're suggesting that your position is in any way more plausible than mine.
And what about you suggests sense? Serious question. I know (you) know you, but from what you've posted, you're operating at a deficit if you're suggesting that your position is in any way more plausible than mine.
>>10572
There is no way, no way in hell that you actually care that much about what happened seven or more years ago.
In any case, our position remains the same: you will stop being a pain.
There is no way, no way in hell that you actually care that much about what happened seven or more years ago.
In any case, our position remains the same: you will stop being a pain.
>>10577
No, I was hoping to get you to be specific with terminology. This is the problem with language. One can know the language inside, outside, and backwards, but if the person they're talking to knows fuckall that a fork isn't a hair-comb, then the conversation is moot
No, I was hoping to get you to be specific with terminology. This is the problem with language. One can know the language inside, outside, and backwards, but if the person they're talking to knows fuckall that a fork isn't a hair-comb, then the conversation is moot
>>10578
I wouldn't care, except what happened those years ago wer forgiven, erased, and memory-holed. Meanwhile, what I'm doing - far less egregious (unless you're Lotus) - is cause for excommunicado
I wouldn't care, except what happened those years ago wer forgiven, erased, and memory-holed. Meanwhile, what I'm doing - far less egregious (unless you're Lotus) - is cause for excommunicado
Anonymous
No.10581
>>10579
>Stop being a cunt
<define cunt
I'm not playing this game. You know exactly what you're doing, and are trying to create linguistic traps to justify it.
>Stop being a cunt
<define cunt
I'm not playing this game. You know exactly what you're doing, and are trying to create linguistic traps to justify it.
>>10580
The problem isn't what happened in the past. The problem is that you refuse to stop in the present, and going into the future.
The problem isn't what happened in the past. The problem is that you refuse to stop in the present, and going into the future.
>>10582
Sorry, sorry, I know you guys are thick.
What I MEAN is "If what happened in the past isn't a problem", then why am I ban evading? You pretend that the one isn't related to the other.
Sorry, sorry, I know you guys are thick.
What I MEAN is "If what happened in the past isn't a problem", then why am I ban evading? You pretend that the one isn't related to the other.
>>10584
See you can't admit wrong doing. This is why no one gives a fuck why you are doing this. Go be retarded somewhere else.
See you can't admit wrong doing. This is why no one gives a fuck why you are doing this. Go be retarded somewhere else.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-339] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
339 replies | 55 files | 118 UUIDs | Page 2