Stop posting porn please, is pretty disgusting
/poner/ - Ponies
Ponies and Pony Accessories
Archived thread
>>1193
Why does Sunny have salt and pepper shakers at her smoothie booth? Well, I guess they're sprinkles.
Why does Sunny have salt and pepper shakers at her smoothie booth? Well, I guess they're sprinkles.
>>1259
You never know when you want a little bit of extra salt in your caramel smoothie, and black pepper goes surprisingly well with strawberries.
You never know when you want a little bit of extra salt in your caramel smoothie, and black pepper goes surprisingly well with strawberries.
Anonymous
No.1307
Poner
No.1312
the constant unending porn is why I will never stay here, Blue board saved ponyfags they just don't know it
>>1337
It depends on whether people just do constant porn threads or if the novelty dies off. I suspect it'll be the latter, but who knows.
It depends on whether people just do constant porn threads or if the novelty dies off. I suspect it'll be the latter, but who knows.
>>1340
Calling it now, a good 3/4 of the board will be taken up by coomer generals by the end of the month
Calling it now, a good 3/4 of the board will be taken up by coomer generals by the end of the month
Poner
No.1345
>>1337
You know the board is still new, a compromise can be met like adjustments to rules on /mlpol/
What do you think of allowing porn but the rule is to keep it spoilered? That should satisfy both people who want redboard content and people who want a blueboard
You know the board is still new, a compromise can be met like adjustments to rules on /mlpol/
What do you think of allowing porn but the rule is to keep it spoilered? That should satisfy both people who want redboard content and people who want a blueboard
Poner
No.1353
>>1344
Its hard to say, people that are regulars on /mlpol/ already have the idea that porn drives of reddit normies so its le good, and given the chance /mlp/ has always leapt at porn posting like in April when it wasn't being banned thats quickly what it turned into.
But porndumps aren't any better than a dedicated /trash/, which /clop/ already exists on nohooves if thats what they want.
Its hard to say, people that are regulars on /mlpol/ already have the idea that porn drives of reddit normies so its le good, and given the chance /mlp/ has always leapt at porn posting like in April when it wasn't being banned thats quickly what it turned into.
But porndumps aren't any better than a dedicated /trash/, which /clop/ already exists on nohooves if thats what they want.
>>1357
Pretty sure that was someone angry about a certain thread and trying to spam in order to get the mods to decide to ban all of it. Classic autism but probably a one-off rather than a sign of a larger trend.
Pretty sure that was someone angry about a certain thread and trying to spam in order to get the mods to decide to ban all of it. Classic autism but probably a one-off rather than a sign of a larger trend.
>>1363
I don't know man, I'm just not really a porn guy I guess. Posting fetish edits in normal threads like the linky thread is weird
I don't know man, I'm just not really a porn guy I guess. Posting fetish edits in normal threads like the linky thread is weird
>>1372
It is, but again, that was probably the point of it. And at least one example of the guy doing it did get deleted, thus why that particular post includes him whining about jannies.
It is, but again, that was probably the point of it. And at least one example of the guy doing it did get deleted, thus why that particular post includes him whining about jannies.
>>1340
>>1344
>>1357
>>1363
>>1372
>>1374
>>1400
make /poner/ the Equivalent of a blue board. same rules as /mlp/ but no EQG Favoritism, I do enjoy EQG, it's not perfect and kinda shit but 80% or more of the EQG threads back on /mlp/ are pure coom and it needs to stop. Solution? /coom/ all coomer threads and generals stay there, pony and eqg or humanized. get them outta here!
>>1344
>>1357
>>1363
>>1372
>>1374
>>1400
make /poner/ the Equivalent of a blue board. same rules as /mlp/ but no EQG Favoritism, I do enjoy EQG, it's not perfect and kinda shit but 80% or more of the EQG threads back on /mlp/ are pure coom and it needs to stop. Solution? /coom/ all coomer threads and generals stay there, pony and eqg or humanized. get them outta here!
Poner
No.1419
>>1407
I mean there's always NHNB, the eqg and coomer stuff could stay here and normal blueboard discussion could stay there. The current shitstorm in the cuck thread is already causing people to want less porn These two sites are gonna be the refuge for 4channers for the time being, may as well use both.
I mean there's always NHNB, the eqg and coomer stuff could stay here and normal blueboard discussion could stay there. The current shitstorm in the cuck thread is already causing people to want less porn These two sites are gonna be the refuge for 4channers for the time being, may as well use both.
Poner
No.2030
>>2024
>make /poner/ a blue board
Don't you worry. With the way certain factions are exploiting grey areas of the rules, its more likely than you think
>make /poner/ a blue board
Don't you worry. With the way certain factions are exploiting grey areas of the rules, its more likely than you think
Yeah, agreed.
It's either to allow porn, but spoil it or make /poner/ a blue board.
It was supposed to be cute mares, but instead we have horse pussy all the time and zigger dicks.
It's either to allow porn, but spoil it or make /poner/ a blue board.
It was supposed to be cute mares, but instead we have horse pussy all the time and zigger dicks.
>>2043
Hypothetically speaking, /poner/ could conceivably be made a blue board with /mlpol/ and /sp/ remaining as red boards, the former of which can be held to a higher standard than /poner/ currently has been (to no one's discredit) while /sp/ can be bullied because it's funny
Hypothetically speaking, /poner/ could conceivably be made a blue board with /mlpol/ and /sp/ remaining as red boards, the former of which can be held to a higher standard than /poner/ currently has been (to no one's discredit) while /sp/ can be bullied because it's funny
Poner
No.2055
>>2043
This. I'm okay with porn, but allowing it only brings in undesirables who just force their shitty degenerate fetishes.
This. I'm okay with porn, but allowing it only brings in undesirables who just force their shitty degenerate fetishes.
OP here. I was joking I'm a degen and like explicit shit but it feels kinda weird having on something as /mlp/. Just hope the board don't become just porn posting and can coexist with active discussion and regular art.
>>2061
Well, that's the thing. It already kinda does become one big gooner slop day by day. It's not about taking the possibility from people to post porn but rather to control it so they won't abuse that possibility. Threads can contain one or two pics of porn from time to time for the shitposting purposes etc. But e.g. Cheerilee thread was supposed to be cute and funny, instead they made horse pussy thread out of it.
Well, that's the thing. It already kinda does become one big gooner slop day by day. It's not about taking the possibility from people to post porn but rather to control it so they won't abuse that possibility. Threads can contain one or two pics of porn from time to time for the shitposting purposes etc. But e.g. Cheerilee thread was supposed to be cute and funny, instead they made horse pussy thread out of it.
>>2062
Might just be people having trouble adjusting going from a blue board to a red board, so they end up overindulging on the kind of stuff they'd normally otherwise get banned for /mlp/. My guess is that once people get it out of their system the porn in unrelated threads will decline in qualitity rapidly.
In the meantime, I know it's too much to ask, but a gentlemen's agreement to keep porn posting to dedicated threads for it would be a great help.
Might just be people having trouble adjusting going from a blue board to a red board, so they end up overindulging on the kind of stuff they'd normally otherwise get banned for /mlp/. My guess is that once people get it out of their system the porn in unrelated threads will decline in qualitity rapidly.
In the meantime, I know it's too much to ask, but a gentlemen's agreement to keep porn posting to dedicated threads for it would be a great help.
>>2074
Yeah, most likely. Time will show. Hopefully you are right.
I don't want to see horse porn everywhere, especially not on wholesome mare threads.
Yeah, most likely. Time will show. Hopefully you are right.
I don't want to see horse porn everywhere, especially not on wholesome mare threads.
Poner
No.2105
>>2083
MLPOL has existed for years and only barely has porn in it. What makes you think that this will become an all-porn thread?
At best, I see containments for specific fetishes, and possibly a banning of blacked/striped. Those people infect every other corner of the internet with their astroturfed and jew-funded artificial fetish. The inflation and gigantism people are odd, but pretty harmless, and less actively invasive and offensive, from my limited understanding and experience.
Trying to moralfag a board that has multiple cultures formed by people who are repulsed by moralfagging is a dumb idea if you want to *reduce* the porn.
Just post more non-porn content to attract attention. The higher order brain functions will draw blood away from the sensory based brain functions.
MLPOL has existed for years and only barely has porn in it. What makes you think that this will become an all-porn thread?
At best, I see containments for specific fetishes, and possibly a banning of blacked/striped. Those people infect every other corner of the internet with their astroturfed and jew-funded artificial fetish. The inflation and gigantism people are odd, but pretty harmless, and less actively invasive and offensive, from my limited understanding and experience.
Trying to moralfag a board that has multiple cultures formed by people who are repulsed by moralfagging is a dumb idea if you want to *reduce* the porn.
Just post more non-porn content to attract attention. The higher order brain functions will draw blood away from the sensory based brain functions.
Proposal:
Add a rule that would let a thread OP on /poner/ decide if the thread is going to be NSFW or SFW.
Ideally this would be done through a change in code where upon thread creation an OP checks a box, and each thread would signify that. This could be added retroactively by moderation. Then perhaps a user can have an option to filter all NSFW checked threads. Pupper says this feature could not be in effect until tomorrow at the very earliest.
Add a rule that would let a thread OP on /poner/ decide if the thread is going to be NSFW or SFW.
Ideally this would be done through a change in code where upon thread creation an OP checks a box, and each thread would signify that. This could be added retroactively by moderation. Then perhaps a user can have an option to filter all NSFW checked threads. Pupper says this feature could not be in effect until tomorrow at the very earliest.
>>2181
Imo, /poner/ should be SFW, but NSFW is still allowed on /mlpol/.
That way, /poner/ is similar to /mlp/, and /mlpol/ retains its founding pornshield.
Imo, /poner/ should be SFW, but NSFW is still allowed on /mlpol/.
That way, /poner/ is similar to /mlp/, and /mlpol/ retains its founding pornshield.
Poner
No.2191
>>2181
Personally, I think the main issue with porn is the board becoming just goon general threads. Having the OP choose wouldn't help with that. Let's see how the board develops but if it does become a problem, then some kind of ruling to limit pornposting generals could be worth thinking about.
That being said OPs being able to define thread topics is a good principle in general, I think. "No porn please" could and should be treated the same as "no tranny trixie shitposting" in e.g. a trixie thread, or for that matter "no futas" in a porn thread, etc.
Personally, I think the main issue with porn is the board becoming just goon general threads. Having the OP choose wouldn't help with that. Let's see how the board develops but if it does become a problem, then some kind of ruling to limit pornposting generals could be worth thinking about.
That being said OPs being able to define thread topics is a good principle in general, I think. "No porn please" could and should be treated the same as "no tranny trixie shitposting" in e.g. a trixie thread, or for that matter "no futas" in a porn thread, etc.
Poner
No.2193
>>2187
Also, this would similarly encourage content on /mlpol/ (the porn, which scares away reddit), and would make it so that /poner/ does not siphon all of /mlpol/'s pony content.
This is a thing that I suggested considering years ago on /qa/.
Also, this would similarly encourage content on /mlpol/ (the porn, which scares away reddit), and would make it so that /poner/ does not siphon all of /mlpol/'s pony content.
This is a thing that I suggested considering years ago on /qa/.
Anonymous
No.2735
you're increasing the reasons I don't return lmao. you know I'm not comin' back, destroy the castle if you'd like. finish it, lavacast it. I do not care for I do not intend on returning
Poner
No.2840
>>2730
Rabbi Schneerson is a lich and not Christ. If you stop drinking gentile blood your brain will clear up.
Rabbi Schneerson is a lich and not Christ. If you stop drinking gentile blood your brain will clear up.
>poll
https://strawpoll.com/PKgle1RYaZp/results
So /poner/ is staying red? Even tho 63.21% agree on some level of restriction?
https://strawpoll.com/PKgle1RYaZp/results
So /poner/ is staying red? Even tho 63.21% agree on some level of restriction?
Poner
No.4059
>>4058
Dunno why people even give weight to an obviously rigged poll. The replies in the discussion thread painted a different story.
Dunno why people even give weight to an obviously rigged poll. The replies in the discussion thread painted a different story.
>>1127
Welp.
But everyone have it's taste I supposed.
But if you want to have a bit of quality, unfortunately, you will have to ban porn.
If we are not a blue board, there will be no attempt to go over it, no attempt at subtility.
Also, creativity is not about porn, so being a red board will deter the creators (beside porn).
So, unless we want to become a coomer board, we should stick to blue.
The 'OP select' is interesting, really.
But if so, it should be locked to, like ~30% of the total threads of the board or so.
That may be a compromise to both keep coomers and creators, but I guess it will make smut less subtle and creative too.
Welp.
But everyone have it's taste I supposed.
But if you want to have a bit of quality, unfortunately, you will have to ban porn.
If we are not a blue board, there will be no attempt to go over it, no attempt at subtility.
Also, creativity is not about porn, so being a red board will deter the creators (beside porn).
So, unless we want to become a coomer board, we should stick to blue.
The 'OP select' is interesting, really.
But if so, it should be locked to, like ~30% of the total threads of the board or so.
That may be a compromise to both keep coomers and creators, but I guess it will make smut less subtle and creative too.
Poner
No.4563
>>2181
I like this idea better.
splitting the pony board would slow down the already slow traffic this site has. when we have the traffic to make a new porn board perhaps, but I think this is a better compromise between population and quality.
I like this idea better.
splitting the pony board would slow down the already slow traffic this site has. when we have the traffic to make a new porn board perhaps, but I think this is a better compromise between population and quality.
>>4557
the OP select is genious because is effectively compromises board population and quality. the problem with smut is seeing it. now you can just hide it. this reminds me of derpibooru's filter system. porn is blocked by default but you can choose to see it.
>make smut less subtle
smut will always go 100%. especially if it is allowed to be somewhere, like dedicated nsfw threads.
the only thing I would add is spoilering nsfw OP images by default (which can be turned off).
the OP select is genious because is effectively compromises board population and quality. the problem with smut is seeing it. now you can just hide it. this reminds me of derpibooru's filter system. porn is blocked by default but you can choose to see it.
>make smut less subtle
smut will always go 100%. especially if it is allowed to be somewhere, like dedicated nsfw threads.
the only thing I would add is spoilering nsfw OP images by default (which can be turned off).
>>4557
>porn is inversely correlated to quality posts
That's factually incorrect.
Obsessing over porn and making it the ruler and means over your life does negativitly effect a person.
It's like shitrea law, no matter how many table cloths are put on a fem-dunecoon, they'll still be raped by the dunecoons.
Is it a problem of provocation? Situationally less offten than the following.
Is it from the inner mind and desire and will and body? Always, if it wasn't there and wasn't trampled why would the set actions occur.
Can a person choose to overcome coomer urges, yes and for some it's harder than others. Can there be explicit words or images, but instead of degenerating chose another way that is tranformed to a higher purpose?
Yes.
The point is not having to have to make that distinction.
Letter of laws don't make a kind people, kind people make kind people.
Out of consideration for others the limit to some subset of posts are done.
The point is where it comes from on the inside for everybody, but not everyone needs that to overcome higher creative impulses being consumed by baser ones.
>porn is inversely correlated to quality posts
That's factually incorrect.
Obsessing over porn and making it the ruler and means over your life does negativitly effect a person.
It's like shitrea law, no matter how many table cloths are put on a fem-dunecoon, they'll still be raped by the dunecoons.
Is it a problem of provocation? Situationally less offten than the following.
Is it from the inner mind and desire and will and body? Always, if it wasn't there and wasn't trampled why would the set actions occur.
Can a person choose to overcome coomer urges, yes and for some it's harder than others. Can there be explicit words or images, but instead of degenerating chose another way that is tranformed to a higher purpose?
Yes.
The point is not having to have to make that distinction.
Letter of laws don't make a kind people, kind people make kind people.
Out of consideration for others the limit to some subset of posts are done.
The point is where it comes from on the inside for everybody, but not everyone needs that to overcome higher creative impulses being consumed by baser ones.
>>4058
as the spoilered text says, its a pretty shit poll, outcome of "red board" was inevitable
retard admins should have made one with two options...
as the spoilered text says, its a pretty shit poll, outcome of "red board" was inevitable
retard admins should have made one with two options...
but why?
>>4576
nigger! two votes is biased in favor of blue board. we're trying to have a discussion of all options here and you want to force the vote on what kind of censorship we will have.
>some level of restriction = blue board vote
eat your own ass!
nigger! two votes is biased in favor of blue board. we're trying to have a discussion of all options here and you want to force the vote on what kind of censorship we will have.
>some level of restriction = blue board vote
eat your own ass!
>>4587
We understand that statistics isn't your forte. Please let the people who do handle the situation for you.
We understand that statistics isn't your forte. Please let the people who do handle the situation for you.
>>4630
>You can prove anything with statistics except the truth?
Obviously you can't. Ever heard of "correlation does not imply causation"? When I'm free later today I'm going to plot a Venn diagram to make it easier for your nigger brain to understand the basics of voting systems.
>You can prove anything with statistics except the truth?
Obviously you can't. Ever heard of "correlation does not imply causation"? When I'm free later today I'm going to plot a Venn diagram to make it easier for your nigger brain to understand the basics of voting systems.
>>4566
So, basically:
- don't allow porn,
- allow OP to chose but hide if red,
- add a filter/option to hide porn by default.
Welp.
I only have one concern with mixed content...
How can you be sure that SFW content will stay here?
Is allowing, like, only 30% red boards would help?
>>4568
Well, I mean, in theory, I agree with you.
in practice, look at how /gif/ on 4chan felt quickly.
Or even, go have a look at the AI thread right here, 90% is porn.
/mlp/ found a balance by prohibiting porn, but allowing links and smut (even if it was gray area).
That way, horny anons could find things to "get started" and go elsewhere for the main event.
On the other hand, Anon could find SFW content in all the board.
Granted, I wouldn't browse /mlp/ on the open at work.
But, imho, limits or restrictions brings creativity in art.
Flutterape is a good example.
Yes, some were clearly sexual.
But a good brunch played with the limits, and that what made it enjoyable.
So, basically:
- don't allow porn,
- allow OP to chose but hide if red,
- add a filter/option to hide porn by default.
Welp.
I only have one concern with mixed content...
How can you be sure that SFW content will stay here?
Is allowing, like, only 30% red boards would help?
>>4568
Well, I mean, in theory, I agree with you.
in practice, look at how /gif/ on 4chan felt quickly.
Or even, go have a look at the AI thread right here, 90% is porn.
/mlp/ found a balance by prohibiting porn, but allowing links and smut (even if it was gray area).
That way, horny anons could find things to "get started" and go elsewhere for the main event.
On the other hand, Anon could find SFW content in all the board.
Granted, I wouldn't browse /mlp/ on the open at work.
But, imho, limits or restrictions brings creativity in art.
Flutterape is a good example.
Yes, some were clearly sexual.
But a good brunch played with the limits, and that what made it enjoyable.
>>4632
tms, oae, trx, ae, l ?
Is it your windows activation key?
You coomer. Pones are pure, mares are for cuddle, not sex!
tms, oae, trx, ae, l ?
Is it your windows activation key?
You coomer. Pones are pure, mares are for cuddle, not sex!
Poner
No.5763
>>2181
My counter-proposal is to stop listening to whiny little bitches.
If they want a sanitized internet, they can go anywhere else. If it matters to them that it's NSFW, they shouldn't be browsing mlpol at work. Or they should browse it, if they want their coworkers to think they're cool.
My counter-proposal is to stop listening to whiny little bitches.
If they want a sanitized internet, they can go anywhere else. If it matters to them that it's NSFW, they shouldn't be browsing mlpol at work. Or they should browse it, if they want their coworkers to think they're cool.
Poner
No.5801
>>5629
>restrictions brings creativity
This is the reason I think we should make /poner/ a blue board. As a red board, half the catalog will be taken up by porn dumps and the most meaningful discussion that takes place will be on par with the goonposting that was rampant in /mlp/'s EQG threads
>restrictions brings creativity
This is the reason I think we should make /poner/ a blue board. As a red board, half the catalog will be taken up by porn dumps and the most meaningful discussion that takes place will be on par with the goonposting that was rampant in /mlp/'s EQG threads
>>5854
Fapping to degeneracy is a time-honored jewish trick, but how are ponies related? Humans have a developmental need to experience orgasm, and ponies are a way for that to happen without engaging in all manner of prescribed degeneracy. Sorry for asking, but are you gay?
Fapping to degeneracy is a time-honored jewish trick, but how are ponies related? Humans have a developmental need to experience orgasm, and ponies are a way for that to happen without engaging in all manner of prescribed degeneracy. Sorry for asking, but are you gay?
Poner
No.5874
>>5854
Porn isn't inherently Jewish. The porn INDUSTRY, yes. OnlyFans, Tinder (basically a fuck app for women), those are indeed Jewish inventions. Porn that I generate of my waifu without any demoralization fetishes isn't. Nobody is involved except for me.
Porn isn't inherently Jewish. The porn INDUSTRY, yes. OnlyFans, Tinder (basically a fuck app for women), those are indeed Jewish inventions. Porn that I generate of my waifu without any demoralization fetishes isn't. Nobody is involved except for me.
>>5856
>Ponies aren't degeneracy
>The fandom has produced all the same degeneracy fetishes as nonpony
Okay retard
>Ponies aren't degeneracy
>The fandom has produced all the same degeneracy fetishes as nonpony
Okay retard
Poner
No.5984
>>5878
>The fandom has produced all the same degeneracy fetishes as nonpony
Hey, I'm sure we've come up with at least one new one.
>The fandom has produced all the same degeneracy fetishes as nonpony
Hey, I'm sure we've come up with at least one new one.
Mare is for care and sex makes them happy. Therefore mares are for sex.
1745322134_2.jpg (117.8 KB, 1024x768, B0C6C0BF-24DB-4B9A-A260-4345A423024B.jpg)
>>5987
>Porn is jewish
Not exactly, pony porn has existed in ancient art going back to ancient Rome and Greece. Romans would commission pornographic pottery from Greeks.
Europeans didn't have a problem with porn until Christianity which was created by jews.
>Porn is jewish
Not exactly, pony porn has existed in ancient art going back to ancient Rome and Greece. Romans would commission pornographic pottery from Greeks.
Europeans didn't have a problem with porn until Christianity which was created by jews.
>>6007
This is the new angle you're trying now? KWAB. It didn't work on /mlp/ and it definitely won't work here. You stand out like a nigger at a Klan rally.
This is the new angle you're trying now? KWAB. It didn't work on /mlp/ and it definitely won't work here. You stand out like a nigger at a Klan rally.
Question for the anti lewd: how would you fare in Equestria when your realize that little horses in fact have genitals of full display all time?
Poner
No.6037
>>6013
You could stop falling for khazarian mind poison or you can continue to receive the wages of sin.
You could stop falling for khazarian mind poison or you can continue to receive the wages of sin.
Poner
No.6041
>>6027
I guess eventual desentization. Is like some sort of Ludovico Test, but I can actually blink and not suffer cramps every time I see a pony puss/ponut.
I guess eventual desentization. Is like some sort of Ludovico Test, but I can actually blink and not suffer cramps every time I see a pony puss/ponut.
Anonymous
No.6050
>>6042
Have you watched the show? Everypony has their tails raised because it makes a cute little arc that looks appealing in 2d. You'll be constantly seeing pony bits.
Have you watched the show? Everypony has their tails raised because it makes a cute little arc that looks appealing in 2d. You'll be constantly seeing pony bits.
Poner
No.6274
>>6007
>coom brained
>you are trans
if you cut your dick off you can no longer coom, so actually anti coomers are the trannies. If you're not going to use it, why do you even have it?
>coom brained
>you are trans
if you cut your dick off you can no longer coom, so actually anti coomers are the trannies. If you're not going to use it, why do you even have it?
114 replies | 21 files | 56 UUIDs | Archived