You're a faggot and this is a slide thread
>furry op image
Golly, who could be behind this thread?
Stop jumping at shadows, kid.
Why would I make a thread like this?
I don't own the copyright on furries.
but that's an unrelated board.>>321334
it's politics related, it's related to the feud between bronies and furries, it's perfectly relevant>>321349
who the fuck are you lmao
>Perhaps not even Nigel this time
The lack of a wall of text surprised me at first
Everyone who ever liked any piece of media with anthropomorphized or otherwise humanized characters is a furry.
like Sonic? Furry.
do you like Scooby Doo? Furry!
Doesn't matter if you want to cum inside Velma, Scooby is a talking dog, so you're a furry if you like that show.
Doge comics and memes? Doesn't matter how ironic they've become, the talking dog with human thoughts makes it furry.
Steampunk is a type of thing, and so is Furry. A Steampunk Western would be different from a Furry western, but while you can make a Steampunk story on its own using the tropes and themes common to it and victorian-era England, good fucking luck making a piece of media that is solely furry without any other genres or themes taken from other genres. Every single piece of furry media ever is mostly something else... A mystery show, an action show, a buddy cop movie, a sitcom, a slice of life anime, or something else. The animals are a gimmick.
"The furry fandom" is a circlejerk for furfags obsessed with this kind of media, original or corporate-made, but if you don't like the fandom you're not a furfag.
Individual websites in the furry genre build their own communities for furfags by deciding what's bannable and what's encouraged and what messages they send when they decide which tantrum-throwing brats should get their way when fighting with other tantrum-throwing brats.
A surprising number of furfags are leftists because masturbation every day makes you weak, even if it's to something based like tomboys.
only self-identification makes you a furry (it works the exact same way as antifa, unsurprisingly).
So if someone wanks off to Renamon but doesn't say "I am a furry" he's not one?
absolutely. if jacking off alone was the only requirement, you'd have all sorts of tiny subsets of which "furry" would be but one, especially small one. you'd have scalies, vore fetishists, the footfags... you'd have to measure whether the furry interest outweighed any intersecting fetishes. that's why masturbation and fetish alone doesn't define the furry community. plus it ignores asexual furries, or simply furries who aren't in it for the porn at all, who by this definition wouldn't be furries, which is absurd.
If we're lucky we might get something like that for Seb.
The prospect of hunting down that bloated prey is high risk but has an even higher reward of keks, it's a big game but maybe someone will eventually have the determination of tracking down such a beast.
Speaking of furries I still can't believe the sonic fandom beat us to making a good pony platformer. I saw it at SAGE, a sonic-style 2D platformer with poners.
that's exactly the discussion I was trying to spark. the link in the OP is an article by a furry positing that furry hatred is merely a proxy or dogwhistle for queerphobia, homophobia, whatever labels. as far as I know it isn't used all that openly as such by far, but why not take the idea on board and start using it?
I'm pretty sure sjws (or leftists in general) are narcissists and pathological liars that know that they speak bullshit so they can manipulate normalfags to do their bidding.
But when they meet people like us, who are unironic living personifications of their strawmen (or worse), they flip the fuck out.
As to your idea, i like it and since we all already know that furries actually are sexual deviants (bestiality, closet pedoph... faggotry, etc etc). I think we are already doing it subconsciously here.
>>321473>that's exactly the discussion I was trying to spark.
Then your original post's paraphrasing should have been more pronounced in it's implication to exemplify the discussion's intentions. >the link in the OP is an article by a furry positing that furry hatred is merely a proxy or dogwhistle for queerphobia, homophobia, whatever labels. as far as I know it isn't used all that openly as such by far, but why not take the idea on board and start using it?
For there is no premised motivation, other than a link to a website where a egotistically delusional author rants about nonsensical questions and answers them for the sole purpose of inflating his own illusions by the repetition of buzzwords. Preposterously pointless paragraphs!
>>321530>Then your original post's paraphrasing should have been more pronounced in it's implication to exemplify the discussion's intentions.
deepest of the apologies.>For there is no premised motivation, other than a link to a website where a egotistically delusional author rants about nonsensical questions and answers them for the sole purpose of inflating his own illusions by the repetition of buzzwords. Preposterously pointless paragraphs!
it's relevant in terms of strategical targeting of hostile online groups.
>>321656>deepest of the apologies.
No worries m8.>it's relevant in terms of strategical targeting of hostile online groups.
My perceptions disregarded the possibility of such tactics, they seek to abolish their rivaled competition by slander and lies or by using group mobbing to intimidate anyone that denies the systematic curriculum, which aims to protect putrescent perverts within the faggot and furry communities.
And so because the courts favor these flamboyant fucks, an improvisation must be made to bypass and manipulate the written orders that prevent their worthlessly weak willed feelings from being broken or bashed by any and all potential adversaries.