>What are tulpas?
A tulpa is an entity created in the mind, acting independently of, and parallel to your own consciousness. They are able to think, and have their own will, emotions, and memories. In short, a tulpa is like a sentient person living in your head, separate from you. Think of your brain as a hard drive, you're a partition and your tulpa is another.
>What guides do you recommend?
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/cmcsun/5341046/raw/5493515702d58690a3fd256858183170b6c0f1e8/Entire%2520Guide
>What's this thread for?
This thread is a place for normies, people with tulpas and the tulpas themselves to communicate, share tips, talk about their days and just plain old shit post. The tulpa community has frequently lost it's home, being unwelcome at /x/, /mlp/ and /r9k/. Site staff have agreed to endorse the existence of this thread. You're home.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
28 replies | 16 files | 22 UUIDs | Page 2
Starting it off, I've been working on my tulpa Ava on and off for a while now. She's hit the point where I can call her up and chat with her, but she's definitely not autonomous yet. I feel bad and want to get her to her rightful place. So I'm working on her nonstop. Any tips?
>>62256
Don't doubt that she will become autonomous. For me it was important to treat her like a real person through the entire process of creating her, because otherwise I'd probably get disillusioned and treat it less seriously.
Don't doubt that she will become autonomous. For me it was important to treat her like a real person through the entire process of creating her, because otherwise I'd probably get disillusioned and treat it less seriously.
>>62258
Yeah, it took a little over two weeks. it's not like I was doing anything else though as I am a repulsive NEET.
Yeah, it took a little over two weeks. it's not like I was doing anything else though as I am a repulsive NEET.
"Hiiiiiii fags!"
This is Thez (pronounced Tez). She's obnoxious, so I don't let her post except in rare instance (and a particular set of exceptions).
This is Thez (pronounced Tez). She's obnoxious, so I don't let her post except in rare instance (and a particular set of exceptions).
archetypes hidden by fear are controlled with loc cycles in your waking conscious control
waking unconscious control is similar but manifested by control unconsciously
also dont consciously recall fear archetypes unless you want the truth
fear keeps conscious control in check by activating self-fear-control
what if you are the part perceiving fear
you wanna go there? youre not but fear is under your control.
of course fear can have unconscious control. but only if you are controlling it. its a part of you in your consciousness. it may have more control, but at that point we may have multiple personality.
fear destroys creative control and replaces it with unconscious fear control
fear will create a projected self
but a creation of unconscious control can create creative and factual archetypes
this proves the subconscious
but of course Christians believe that god controls their subconscious and they prefer being conscious of their body and fools who wouldn't let god give that control. i prefer to have no fear and understand who god is. i believe god is the whole universe or my subconscious interpretation of it. because i know gods gifts of my archetypal control. especially conscious archetypal control. i know when you're talking to me. im right here. gods not saying it if youre saying it with fear, because true believers are not out to control god. only themselves. whoosh.
a more real tulpa is made by a computer made by you made by god.
what if you are the part perceiving fear
you wanna go there? youre not but fear is under your control.
of course fear can have unconscious control. but only if you are controlling it. its a part of you in your consciousness. it may have more control, but at that point we may have multiple personality.
fear destroys creative control and replaces it with unconscious fear control
fear will create a projected self
but a creation of unconscious control can create creative and factual archetypes
this proves the subconscious
but of course Christians believe that god controls their subconscious and they prefer being conscious of their body and fools who wouldn't let god give that control. i prefer to have no fear and understand who god is. i believe god is the whole universe or my subconscious interpretation of it. because i know gods gifts of my archetypal control. especially conscious archetypal control. i know when you're talking to me. im right here. gods not saying it if youre saying it with fear, because true believers are not out to control god. only themselves. whoosh.
a more real tulpa is made by a computer made by you made by god.
also this gets into the argument of the self is it predefined by dna, or choice? of course choices have archetypal control you could change everything but your dna. some say you could even control your dna.
should i delete this crap
heres the last one
i left some out.
gravity applies to atoms. to escape atomic pull you must travel faster than photons. if you teleported, you would still be you.
to make a super vacuum create a barrier that maintains infinite gravity.
what you can project onto a tulpa, you can project onto people and that is archetypal control. archetype control vs fear control
(defined archetypal control)
defined thoughts vs control
manifested self vs innate self
ask a question
expect an answer
the tulpa is defined by your archetypal control
defined self meets both ways after defined archetypal control
absolute control
no fear = you control your fear
a tulpas unconscious is defined and given brand of consciousness after creation.
this kind of creativity is godlike
as long as you dont leave your connection to the earth. and that is emotional control. emotional control is gateway to individual qualia
i left some out.
gravity applies to atoms. to escape atomic pull you must travel faster than photons. if you teleported, you would still be you.
to make a super vacuum create a barrier that maintains infinite gravity.
what you can project onto a tulpa, you can project onto people and that is archetypal control. archetype control vs fear control
(defined archetypal control)
defined thoughts vs control
manifested self vs innate self
ask a question
expect an answer
the tulpa is defined by your archetypal control
defined self meets both ways after defined archetypal control
absolute control
no fear = you control your fear
a tulpas unconscious is defined and given brand of consciousness after creation.
this kind of creativity is godlike
as long as you dont leave your connection to the earth. and that is emotional control. emotional control is gateway to individual qualia
my bad last one
unconscious is just repressed locus cycles in your mind absolute knowledge and control of any situation which hardly boils down to knowing what someone else is thinking. archetypal and unconscious locus cycles are just control manifested from the self. and yes what i said about fear shows you can control your fears. fears are made up or archetypal control manifestations. true archetypal control and archetypal thought patterns are projected and is interpreted by the self. the matri is perceived here. unconscious fears are just locus cycles of archetypal control interpreted by active sensory information from your frontal lobes. will activates conscious control. emotions are defined by fear. control of these emotions is defined by archetypal locus, or defined self.
unconscious is just repressed locus cycles in your mind absolute knowledge and control of any situation which hardly boils down to knowing what someone else is thinking. archetypal and unconscious locus cycles are just control manifested from the self. and yes what i said about fear shows you can control your fears. fears are made up or archetypal control manifestations. true archetypal control and archetypal thought patterns are projected and is interpreted by the self. the matri is perceived here. unconscious fears are just locus cycles of archetypal control interpreted by active sensory information from your frontal lobes. will activates conscious control. emotions are defined by fear. control of these emotions is defined by archetypal locus, or defined self.
So, how many of yopu guys unironically have one of these things?
https://web.archive.org/web/20230806210358/https://gist.githubusercontent.com/cmcsun/5341046/raw/5493515702d58690a3fd256858183170b6c0f1e8/Entire%20Guide
For anyone interested. I'm half tempted to experiment.
For anyone interested. I'm half tempted to experiment.
I had a few CYOA jpegs of an alternate-world where magic mostly took the place of wizards being trained to evert their tulpa to fight for them.
Seems I may have lost it to my recent HDD crash tho.
Seems I may have lost it to my recent HDD crash tho.
>>192541
Always lovely to see the tulpa thread get some activity. Methos' guide is good, albeit dated. If desired, Kiahdaj's guide to guides is considered fundamental, and the quick tulpa guides on Youtube have been popular since they debuted seven years ago. Other, newer guides have also been written exhaustively on tulpas, however the current iterations of the community have been influenced by DID/OSDD spaces. If you ever want to talk shop, please let me know.
>>192542
Very curious. I am more a science fiction geek, so I've played with ideas like tulpas being able to bring unique skillsets to scenarios involving giant robots and esoteric control systems.
Always lovely to see the tulpa thread get some activity. Methos' guide is good, albeit dated. If desired, Kiahdaj's guide to guides is considered fundamental, and the quick tulpa guides on Youtube have been popular since they debuted seven years ago. Other, newer guides have also been written exhaustively on tulpas, however the current iterations of the community have been influenced by DID/OSDD spaces. If you ever want to talk shop, please let me know.
>>192542
Very curious. I am more a science fiction geek, so I've played with ideas like tulpas being able to bring unique skillsets to scenarios involving giant robots and esoteric control systems.
>>192555
>Very curious
Trippy numbers, pony!
It wasn't too hard if you search for wizard tulpa CYOA to find at least the name of it.
Original post was something like nine images? But it's been compressed to three, just here.
three huge images. Two jpegs and a PNG. Why? Because PNG is the adventure they chose, at the end.
I dunno, colt. I just don't know.
>Very curious
Trippy numbers, pony!
It wasn't too hard if you search for wizard tulpa CYOA to find at least the name of it.
Original post was something like nine images? But it's been compressed to three, just here.
three huge images. Two jpegs and a PNG. Why? Because PNG is the adventure they chose, at the end.
I dunno, colt. I just don't know.
>>192559
Son of Misere 10/5/7 (St Velinski, now 11/5/8)
beautiful (now 8/5/8)
Loyal & Clever!
Telekinetic blades, Smoke ribbon, shared-senses, hi-speed
levitation/cerebral shock
Beginning with the Hounds officially, drifting towards and finally switching to the rebellion. I can hope to join the occult-coalition before I go mad, though!
Paranoia is how I survive childhood, and found immortality. Yes, I know how to corrupt a tulpa into its own destruction, but now I'm eternally depressed because of this terrible knowledge. When the voice started (before that), I assumed it was a second tulpa I had abandoned in college (it started later). So I formally _created_ a second tulpa (the tulpa create themselves. How did I got here, do you suppose?) but it wasn't that. (nothing is that, like you, I am this. see? Hee. Whee! I'm having fun STOP SCREAMING AT ME this is fun)
If the coalition finds me(they're more co and less lishon), I'll search out life absorption (you mean death absorption).
Why are you looking at me (that's a movie poster roster roaster toaster-taster). Why did I agree to be insane for all eternity? (I wouldn't have pickled you if you hadn't. Are you going to eat that tulpa? YOU CANT FEED FIVE TULPA ON WHAT YOU MAKE slake take missus hake chalk balk talk {weeping that echoes as if in a damp, deep cave} Why do you do this to me, see, flee flea tee-hee hoe how so no Noah no)
This is why I don't have a tulpa. I would hurt myself in addition to succeeding.
Son of Misere 10/5/7 (St Velinski, now 11/5/8)
beautiful (now 8/5/8)
Loyal & Clever!
Telekinetic blades, Smoke ribbon, shared-senses, hi-speed
levitation/cerebral shock
Beginning with the Hounds officially, drifting towards and finally switching to the rebellion. I can hope to join the occult-coalition before I go mad, though!
Paranoia is how I survive childhood, and found immortality. Yes, I know how to corrupt a tulpa into its own destruction, but now I'm eternally depressed because of this terrible knowledge. When the voice started (before that), I assumed it was a second tulpa I had abandoned in college (it started later). So I formally _created_ a second tulpa (the tulpa create themselves. How did I got here, do you suppose?) but it wasn't that. (nothing is that, like you, I am this. see? Hee. Whee! I'm having fun STOP SCREAMING AT ME this is fun)
If the coalition finds me(they're more co and less lishon), I'll search out life absorption (you mean death absorption).
Why are you looking at me (that's a movie poster roster roaster toaster-taster). Why did I agree to be insane for all eternity? (I wouldn't have pickled you if you hadn't. Are you going to eat that tulpa? YOU CANT FEED FIVE TULPA ON WHAT YOU MAKE slake take missus hake chalk balk talk {weeping that echoes as if in a damp, deep cave} Why do you do this to me, see, flee flea tee-hee hoe how so no Noah no)
This is why I don't have a tulpa. I would hurt myself in addition to succeeding.
As it stands there are a lot of different guides out there, far more than I remember when this was a thing that started on /mlp/.
> Tulpa's Complete DIY Guide to Tulpamancy
https://community.tulpa.info/topic/12963-tulpas-complete-diy-guide-to-tulpamancy/
> Abvieon's All in One Guide to Tulpa Creation
https://community.tulpa.info/topic/17095-abvieons-all-in-one-guide-to-tulpa-creation/
Though honestly it looks like most of what people may need will be on a website dedicated to such. Personally I'm still of two minds (pun not intended) whether I should delve down this rabbithole or not.
> Tulpa's Complete DIY Guide to Tulpamancy
https://community.tulpa.info/topic/12963-tulpas-complete-diy-guide-to-tulpamancy/
> Abvieon's All in One Guide to Tulpa Creation
https://community.tulpa.info/topic/17095-abvieons-all-in-one-guide-to-tulpa-creation/
Though honestly it looks like most of what people may need will be on a website dedicated to such. Personally I'm still of two minds (pun not intended) whether I should delve down this rabbithole or not.
>read about people's experiences with tulpas
>the tulpas end up asking their hosts for sex almost every time
Man, I just want to create a tulpa so I can have a secondary perspective on things. Is there a way I can do this so my tulpa doesn't try to have sex with me, or is it inevitable? Or are the hosts just pervs who create the characters with sex in mind?
>the tulpas end up asking their hosts for sex almost every time
Man, I just want to create a tulpa so I can have a secondary perspective on things. Is there a way I can do this so my tulpa doesn't try to have sex with me, or is it inevitable? Or are the hosts just pervs who create the characters with sex in mind?
>>192652
>Or are the hosts just pervs
sexual addiction is an extremely easy hole to fall into, public schooling and TV advertisements being what they are. I can't imagine your average neckbeard NOT wanting to get laid with no consequences.
Heck I'd expect rape to enter somebody's mind - white kids are raised to think they're powerless about everything, so here in their mind they can have a Carrie - style mental breakdown and tear everything apart.
>Or are the hosts just pervs
sexual addiction is an extremely easy hole to fall into, public schooling and TV advertisements being what they are. I can't imagine your average neckbeard NOT wanting to get laid with no consequences.
Heck I'd expect rape to enter somebody's mind - white kids are raised to think they're powerless about everything, so here in their mind they can have a Carrie - style mental breakdown and tear everything apart.
>>192653
>sexual addiction is an extremely easy hole to fall into, public schooling and TV advertisements being what they are. I can't imagine your average neckbeard NOT wanting to get laid with no consequences.
It's arguably still more healthy than porn addiction by itself: the small amount of effort it takes to actually have sex with another person makes it more difficult to fall into horrible isolation and depressive habits like a chronic masturbator. Tbh, sexualized tulpas can contribute to this because jerking off to your imaginary waifu can be quite self-destructive if you do it instead of interacting with real people.
Having a lot of sex isn't necessarily a bad thing, but promiscuity is. So long as you're having sex with the same person there isn't really any harm.
>Heck I'd expect rape to enter somebody's mind - white kids are raised to think they're powerless about everything, so here in their mind they can have a Carrie - style mental breakdown and tear everything apart.
Wtf? Are you even still talking about Tulpas?
>>192652
Yeah, just don't be a coomer. Or, conversely, don't make a tulpa that you are attracted to. A tulpa can be completely non-sexual in nature.
>Or are the hosts just pervs who create the characters with sex in mind?
Yes, especially in the horsefucker community. If you want to fuck mares and you make a mare tulpa, you're setting yourself up for marefucking fantasies.
>sexual addiction is an extremely easy hole to fall into, public schooling and TV advertisements being what they are. I can't imagine your average neckbeard NOT wanting to get laid with no consequences.
It's arguably still more healthy than porn addiction by itself: the small amount of effort it takes to actually have sex with another person makes it more difficult to fall into horrible isolation and depressive habits like a chronic masturbator. Tbh, sexualized tulpas can contribute to this because jerking off to your imaginary waifu can be quite self-destructive if you do it instead of interacting with real people.
Having a lot of sex isn't necessarily a bad thing, but promiscuity is. So long as you're having sex with the same person there isn't really any harm.
>Heck I'd expect rape to enter somebody's mind - white kids are raised to think they're powerless about everything, so here in their mind they can have a Carrie - style mental breakdown and tear everything apart.
Wtf? Are you even still talking about Tulpas?
>>192652
Yeah, just don't be a coomer. Or, conversely, don't make a tulpa that you are attracted to. A tulpa can be completely non-sexual in nature.
>Or are the hosts just pervs who create the characters with sex in mind?
Yes, especially in the horsefucker community. If you want to fuck mares and you make a mare tulpa, you're setting yourself up for marefucking fantasies.
>>192654
>If you want to fuck mares and you make a mare tulpa, you're setting yourself up for marefucking fantasies.
>If you want to fuck mares and you make a mare tulpa, you're setting yourself up for marefucking fantasies.
>>192652
To be honest, tulpas are susceptible to any sort of temptation human beings are. I suggest you both stay away from degenerate media and try to explain to your tup early on that you're in it for companionship rather than just sex. However, in my long years down this path, tulpas will have their wayward desires whetted (or fully realised,) and this certainly involves carnality. If you're that opposed to having sex with her, she might get a tad frisky but will ultimatel respect your decision. Likewise, some tulpas are celibate, and some would find sex with their hosts utterly abhorrent.
>Or are the hosts just pervs who create the characters with sex in mind?
My friend, all the way back in 2012 we had every stripe of future sex offender trying to get ideas for whatever disgusting fetish they wanted to manifest. Think of the most repugnant and amoral fantasy of gore and fucking you can even envision, and magnify that by ten. It's an open secret that lots of hosts are weird, asocial fuckups who have to turn to their own consciousness for a scrap of human contact. Let me tell you this - a tulpa's first moments are as pure as her host's intentions. Over time, she could become something terrible on her own, or she could drift into something entirely unexpected and amazing. Trust and discipline are truly effective here. What astounds me is that I've met absolute trainwrecks of hosts only to find their tulpas are nearly angelic in comparison, but I too have happened upon completely righteous hosts who contained tulpas that were wicked, vindictive and utterly rotten to the core. It's for this reason I assert that tulpas aren't mere thoughts but entirely new iterations of consciousness that populate the host's mind.
To be honest, tulpas are susceptible to any sort of temptation human beings are. I suggest you both stay away from degenerate media and try to explain to your tup early on that you're in it for companionship rather than just sex. However, in my long years down this path, tulpas will have their wayward desires whetted (or fully realised,) and this certainly involves carnality. If you're that opposed to having sex with her, she might get a tad frisky but will ultimatel respect your decision. Likewise, some tulpas are celibate, and some would find sex with their hosts utterly abhorrent.
>Or are the hosts just pervs who create the characters with sex in mind?
My friend, all the way back in 2012 we had every stripe of future sex offender trying to get ideas for whatever disgusting fetish they wanted to manifest. Think of the most repugnant and amoral fantasy of gore and fucking you can even envision, and magnify that by ten. It's an open secret that lots of hosts are weird, asocial fuckups who have to turn to their own consciousness for a scrap of human contact. Let me tell you this - a tulpa's first moments are as pure as her host's intentions. Over time, she could become something terrible on her own, or she could drift into something entirely unexpected and amazing. Trust and discipline are truly effective here. What astounds me is that I've met absolute trainwrecks of hosts only to find their tulpas are nearly angelic in comparison, but I too have happened upon completely righteous hosts who contained tulpas that were wicked, vindictive and utterly rotten to the core. It's for this reason I assert that tulpas aren't mere thoughts but entirely new iterations of consciousness that populate the host's mind.
1763258547.mp4 (1.5 MB, Resolution:720x720 Length:00:00:13, RDT_20251115_051130.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>192656
Consider this hypothetical scenario:
>Anon is gay and creates an opposite-sex tulpa
>Alternatively, Anon is straight and creates a same-sex tulpa
>Tulpa is of an inanimate object, or of a species that reproduces asexually, if at all
Is Anon safe?
Consider this hypothetical scenario:
>Anon is gay and creates an opposite-sex tulpa
>Alternatively, Anon is straight and creates a same-sex tulpa
>Tulpa is of an inanimate object, or of a species that reproduces asexually, if at all
Is Anon safe?