RP/Shitposting thread - D&D 3.5 base rules, subject to interpretation, review, and elaboration. Open for all to spectate, bantz, shitpost, or full-on play.
We begin this thread in anticipation of the weekend, where most of the party is gradually infiltrating the grand city of Cardishore. With disguises varying from an Emu, Barney the dinosaur, and a mexican clown,... as well as Fae who is entirely without costume, Trump, Tracy, and Infernius try to get a handle on whatever the hell is going on in Cardishore now or in general.
Meanwhile, Torcuil is working to get that damn cannon fixed on the Stray Cat. Meanwhile Stix returns (to the tower?) with not many answers, an over-sized acorn, and definitely no other surprises.
Meanwhile Thez,... poor forgotten and alone Thez who is babysitting the port so that none of the party's enemies see their departure and think "Wah ha ha ha! With them gone I will destroy their precious city!" I mean she gets it,... but still.
>sad dwelf noises
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
1561 replies and 112 files omitted.
>>60013
>pointless destruction of property
That only increases the chance of getting killed in various ways, or corridors of escape being shut-off, or the enemy recognizing you through the disguise.
>pointless destruction of property
That only increases the chance of getting killed in various ways, or corridors of escape being shut-off, or the enemy recognizing you through the disguise.
>>60014
That was about all I was allowed to watch for about half a decade. My parents were very cautious about what TV could do to a developing kid.
That was about all I was allowed to watch for about half a decade. My parents were very cautious about what TV could do to a developing kid.
Wait a minute. If Fae moves to the bot in a move action, then readies to cast Obscuring Mist after Trumpaladin makes his attack, then Trumpaladin could attack and the obscuring mist be placed directly over them, which would require at least one of the flame weapons for the robots to clear, necessarily wasting an enemy attack
>>60018
You've been whining "give me something to kill, I'm craving xp" for months now
>>60018
You've been whining "give me something to kill, I'm craving xp" for months now
>>60023
Concealment wouldn't protect you from breath weapons, I think.
Also, do you really wanna risk that Concentration check to destroy a couple more bots when you could just escape?
Concealment wouldn't protect you from breath weapons, I think.
Also, do you really wanna risk that Concentration check to destroy a couple more bots when you could just escape?
>>60025
>Concealment
Read the entry for Obscuring mist. The only way to disperse it, besides wind, is fire. They'll have to burn it away first, which is precisely what they will do.
>Concealment
Read the entry for Obscuring mist. The only way to disperse it, besides wind, is fire. They'll have to burn it away first, which is precisely what they will do.
>>60027
Would the robots even attack the mist automatically? Aren’t they programmed to attack humanoids or similar forms that don’t have ID?
Would the robots even attack the mist automatically? Aren’t they programmed to attack humanoids or similar forms that don’t have ID?
>>60029
If the robots do not attack Trump and Fae when they are in the mist, then I'm not sure what the problem is
If the robots do not attack Trump and Fae when they are in the mist, then I'm not sure what the problem is
>>60027
Yeah, but the weapon would still hit you as the bots blasted through it.
Regardless, is this really what you want to do?
Yeah, but the weapon would still hit you as the bots blasted through it.
Regardless, is this really what you want to do?
>>60032
Hmmm.... If it's not an effective shield for an attack, then maybe it would be best to use it in the center, so maybe a bot will be confused and won't make it across to attack
>sure you want to do this
I just want to kill one. Not all five, not waves of reinforcements, just one before it's time to run
Hmmm.... If it's not an effective shield for an attack, then maybe it would be best to use it in the center, so maybe a bot will be confused and won't make it across to attack
>sure you want to do this
I just want to kill one. Not all five, not waves of reinforcements, just one before it's time to run
>>60036
I'll take the opportunity to point out that no matter how she had played it, that scene where Tracy was trying to hide in an alley from the first bot was absolutely hilarious to me, considering thermal vision.
>I is sneaky hided -Tracy
>Obvious AF signature detected -Shazbot
I'll take the opportunity to point out that no matter how she had played it, that scene where Tracy was trying to hide in an alley from the first bot was absolutely hilarious to me, considering thermal vision.
>I is sneaky hided -Tracy
>Obvious AF signature detected -Shazbot
>>60037
It gave me a chuckle too, particularly the image of her futilely attempting to hide big bird on top of that.
It gave me a chuckle too, particularly the image of her futilely attempting to hide big bird on top of that.
>>60037
Then the question comes... how are they fooled by ID card? Would the card have to tell it a certain heat signature to identify to let the person pass? Maybe I’m thinking too hard about it.
Then the question comes... how are they fooled by ID card? Would the card have to tell it a certain heat signature to identify to let the person pass? Maybe I’m thinking too hard about it.
File (): 1CA2481495B5605B8B064A0373B5BD19-26771.jpg (26.1 KB, 500x377, hide.jpg)
>>60043
Good to know.
Another question about attacks: if a sword is described as "+2" where do I apply the bonus? To the roll for damage, or to see if it hit?
Good to know.
Another question about attacks: if a sword is described as "+2" where do I apply the bonus? To the roll for damage, or to see if it hit?
>>60047
Fuck you. You go die and lose all of your equipment, including impossible to replace items, because of a misinterpretation of a spell
Fuck you. You go die and lose all of your equipment, including impossible to replace items, because of a misinterpretation of a spell
>>60048
They're not lost, they're buried.
I just don't want to do all this meta every time someone dies.
They're not lost, they're buried.
I just don't want to do all this meta every time someone dies.
>>60056
Are other people leaving or are they not? If yes, then he goes with them. If no, then he stays with them
Are other people leaving or are they not? If yes, then he goes with them. If no, then he stays with them
So then, is that what happens?
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-850] [851-900] [901-950] [951-1000] [1001-1050] [1051-1100] [1101-1150] [1151-1200] [1201-1250] [1251-1300] [1301-1350] [1351-1400] [1401-1450] [1451-1500] [1501-1550] [1551-1600] [1601-1611] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
1611 replies | 116 files | 18 UUIDs | Page 33