/vx/ has been one of more freuently used boards for along time now. The board throws a wide net, attmpting to formally encompass the topics of /v/ and /x/, and informally encompass the concepts and topics of /tg/, /qst/, and arguably /vint/. While the board has seen lots of use in its days, its wide range of topics might also be to its detriment.
For starters, the concept of /vx/ began a continuation of the theme of the April 2017 prank of combined boards being ironically better than their respective parent boards. /vx/ was proposed in response to demand for players who wanted a place to discuss video games and other players who wanted a place to talk about supernatual things, as a means of giving a space for both. The thing is, while ll of the other boards were based on wordplays or jokes on behalf of the 4cuck staff, /vx/ was just kind of based on wanting to fill two niches with just one board. That was fine, as the /v/ and the /x/ posters didn't really get in eachothers way or argue, but they also didn't really interact in any notable way even f they did overlap. Many of th posters appear to stick to their handful of generals. There haven't been any memes that have emerged based on th concept of the usion of /v/ and /x/, or even /tg/ and /x/, as it appears that the concept of mixing fantasy game magic with actual magic isn't as adhesive as originally intended.
Shortly after it was created, /vx/ was coneptually expanded to include all gaming discussion, including /tg/ discussion and /qst/ style pbp roleplay threads. Those are certainly topics that this site benefits from, as all pony altchans have roleplay boards, and roleplay is banned on /mlp/ while ponies are banned everywhere else on 4chan. The roleplay threads take up the overwhelming majority of the boards posts per day, with discarded threads taking the lion's share of the board's catalog. You could even say traditional games and roleplay is the unofficial main topic of /vx/, despite it not being represented in the board's name. /vx/ certainly has a great volume rp posts, but general roleplay discussion has suffered, in part due to being suffocated by the board's other topics: it doesn't help ease of casual rp discussion when you have to first specify that you're talking about fantasy magic over actual magic, and roleplaying games instead of video games. The threads on the board that are aimed towards /tg/-style discussion don't get very many replies. The flags and IDs don't really contribute to those aspects either.
That aside, roleplay definitely has the potential to be a big thing on this site, and I'm certain that we could do better. All the other pony altchans have prolific roleplay boards, and I'm certain /pol/acks have their on unique roleplay ideas too.
Meta-wise, /vx/ is formally-blue (now red) board where posts have both flags and image IDs, similar to /mlpol/. That coflicts with the concept though, because neither /v/ nor /x/ had those components, neither are they necessary for discussion on either board.
Obviously, the inclusion of flags is a nod to /vint/, our sister board. /vint/ was one of the other April 1st 2017 board that everyone liked, being another board that several Anons demanded to have reinstated on 4chins to no avail. "She" was featured in the /mlpol/-tan comic that many of us bonded over in the /qa/ wars as they spilled into [s4s], having met /mlpol/-tan in the darkness of the deleted zone where they encountered the ravenous /z/. The flags were added to sate Anons who wanted to bring /vint/ back, although the board hasn't really satisfied the feel or appearance of the old /vint/, especially since neither /vint/ nor any of the boards it was effectively combined with featured image IDs.
Now, don't get me wrong, /vx/ is my secon favorite board after /mlpol/. I just really think this site could do
>"So what do you propose, faggot?"
I propose that /vx/, with due anticipation and announcement, should be archived in place of other board(s) that better accomodate its many topics. The boards would be separate and based on ideas that mesh together or have cultural sigificance, such as:
>/vint/ ("international vidya"): our sister board which was in high demand for ressurrecion. It already has its wn memes, and even a cute board-tan. Bringing /vint/ back would satisfy the needfor a place to discuss video games (and random pajeeting), while reaffirming this site's committment to 2017 nostalgia. The board should feature flags, but not poster IDs, in spirit of our sister board.
>/kx/ (maybe "weaponized autism"): A dangerously-based idea that was proposed as an alternative to /vx/ as early as 2017. /kx/ would be a radical and mystic hive of schizoposting, and an original hybrid board that 4chins jannies weren't brave enough to create. It would satisfy the want for /x/-tier supernatural discussion and conspiracy theories, while also providing space for this board's currently-untapped potential for gunposting and prepping. The /x/ side of /vx/ wouldn't really suffer at all from being divorced from the /tg/ and /v/ elements, and the big-schizo energy from the /k/ element of the board could serve as a huge bullet-shaped viagra to supercharge the board's discussion and create its own culture. /kx/ would have neither post IDs nor flags, as anonyity is important to it.
>/hp/ (maybe "Horseplay"?): A roleplay board that the bathhouse threads could migrate to and make their own without smothering video games discussion. A roleplay board serves to benefit a community such as ours as it facilitates creation if OCs and other content, which is why other pony altchans give them their own boards. It could also be the place for /tg/ disussion, or CYOAs. /hp/ would have neither flags nor post IDs, as none of its elements (/mlp/, /tg/, or /qst/) have them.
These are ideas I've considered for a while. I wouldn't expect them to be implemented immeditely, but perhaps you guys might take some time to warm up to the idea for the future?
Thoughts?
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
1643832512.jpg (87.4 KB, 833x821, 5E9BD9CEA1EFEE0A27A4B3968B213F17-200101.jpg)
139 replies and 32 files omitted.
Now, I know that the idea of splitting up a board has potentia to cause disturbance, so I've considered how people would respond to this:
>/vx/ is fine how it is. There's no need to change it.
Is it though? Aside from the few general at the top of the catalog, most of the threads are pretty much dead. I think this site and this community has potential to do a lot better after observing it for almost 5 years. We are /mlpol/: we're supposed to be the best.
>I post to /vx/ all of the time, and I raher like my threads. I wouldn't want to have to change it.
So do I, and this move wouldn't and shouldn't necessitate posters giving up anything they currently have. Posters who frequent threads or generals in the old board could easily continue or remake those threads on the new boards, with greater specificity and content.
>having so many relatively-slow threads would be ugly
Look at /vx/. Skip through the pages and look at the threads. Most of the threads haven't had any posts made to them in years before they were necrobumped a few years ago. In comparison, a few extra chracters at the top of the screen would be nothing.
>I we split it into multiple boards, they'd all just be even deader.
Quite the opposite, actually. /vx/ is a fusion of multiple concepts; while that promotes content if the topics have synergy, it does the opposite if they do not. Giving each of the topics their space to breath could actually promote content in them.
Furthermore, these boards all include one or more of /vx/'s most active components, and they would continue to be active on their respective boards filling up the catalog: the roleplayers would continue to roleplay, the vidyaposters would continue to discuss vidya, and the /x/posters would continue to talk about metaphysics and argue about nonsense. The boards would be filled even more by their hybrid aspects: gunposting on /kx/ has potential to be very prolific on a /pol/-offshoot community in addition to generating its own dangerously-based memes, /vint/ would be fueled by 2017 nostalgia as well as the sheer scale of vidya discourse potential when not suffocated by other topics, /hp/ (or whatever else you want to call it) could become a place for CYOAs OC creation, and the kind of casual greentext that 4cuck jannies hte for some reason.
>this is just a /v/-tiet balkanization
This is nothing of the sort. The respetive topics had nothing to do with one another and very little conceptual synergy. Splitting them up from one another, and pairing them with more appropriate hybrid elements doesn't split u their own respective topics.
>We don't need more boards
The only really new element of this would be the /k/ element, and I know it has plenty of potential in this community. Otherwise, it's just giving due space to concepts
>It's already been like this for 4 years. Why change it?
I wasn't sure about /vx/ as a concept 4 years ago, and I'm certain we could do better now. I was prolific poster on /vx/ for years and I think I have a decent understanding of what elements of it are good and which ones have quite frankly been insubstantial. Just count all of the dead threads and failed conversations. We can do better than this.
>/vx/ is irrelevant to the main topics of /mlpol/, and thus its quality is low priority
This is a misconception. All of the topics currently smushed together on /vx/ can in some way or form be related to the topic of ponies or politics. Furthermore, these topics are hobbies that encourage user engagement and site participation: users shouldn't feel like they need to go to other chans to get a quality experience for those topics, so it is in the interest of th community to encourage discusson thereof.
>/mlpol/ is too small to sustain quality discussion of these topics, so why even bother?
This is an overstated and rather nihilist attitude that unortunately discorages some users here. If you compare /mlpol/ to a lot of other chans of simila kinds, we actually have quit a high post per day count. Similar alt chans of similar or smaller size are able to sustain boards like this with daily posts, so we certainly could too.
>we've already made too many new boards, and the last two we made are basiclly dead already. This well just be the same.
Quite frankly, I think /cyb/ and /ub/ suffer similar issues in being oo broad and unspecific of topics, but /vx/ is different because it possesses at least three already-present elements that are prolific enough o fill up catalogs on their own.
>If these boards are a success, they'd just attact newags and discord trannies
That's the same logic as saying that /vx/ itself would be bad for the site if it were good. Having good content that attracts users isn't always a bad thing. Besides, we still have our pornshield among other perks of this site that scare aay hostile invasion.
>You're a shill trying to damage our community!
I wouldn't have spent all this time typing if I didn't actully care about /mlpo/ and even /vx/. I just want our site to do better.
>That's such a big idea. I'm not sure if I'm comfortable with it...
It would be a big step, yes, but we coud take it slowly. We could take months planning it. Each board could even have its own conceptual thread on /qa/ as its planned.
>This is just more work for the Devteam who are already overburdened.
Making boards isn't as hard as it sounds. Any admin can do it.
>All these ideas suck
I cant say they're perfect, but we could talk about them to improve them to work them out.
>I am a user of /vx/ and am a fan of memes and threads that are uique the the board and wouldn't fit on any of these new ones.
I quite frankly don't know of any unique /vx/ memes, but if you're a fan of content unique to the concept of /vx/, please speak up! It's important to preserve any culture that this community has developed over the years.
>/vx/ is fine how it is. There's no need to change it.
Is it though? Aside from the few general at the top of the catalog, most of the threads are pretty much dead. I think this site and this community has potential to do a lot better after observing it for almost 5 years. We are /mlpol/: we're supposed to be the best.
>I post to /vx/ all of the time, and I raher like my threads. I wouldn't want to have to change it.
So do I, and this move wouldn't and shouldn't necessitate posters giving up anything they currently have. Posters who frequent threads or generals in the old board could easily continue or remake those threads on the new boards, with greater specificity and content.
>having so many relatively-slow threads would be ugly
Look at /vx/. Skip through the pages and look at the threads. Most of the threads haven't had any posts made to them in years before they were necrobumped a few years ago. In comparison, a few extra chracters at the top of the screen would be nothing.
>I we split it into multiple boards, they'd all just be even deader.
Quite the opposite, actually. /vx/ is a fusion of multiple concepts; while that promotes content if the topics have synergy, it does the opposite if they do not. Giving each of the topics their space to breath could actually promote content in them.
Furthermore, these boards all include one or more of /vx/'s most active components, and they would continue to be active on their respective boards filling up the catalog: the roleplayers would continue to roleplay, the vidyaposters would continue to discuss vidya, and the /x/posters would continue to talk about metaphysics and argue about nonsense. The boards would be filled even more by their hybrid aspects: gunposting on /kx/ has potential to be very prolific on a /pol/-offshoot community in addition to generating its own dangerously-based memes, /vint/ would be fueled by 2017 nostalgia as well as the sheer scale of vidya discourse potential when not suffocated by other topics, /hp/ (or whatever else you want to call it) could become a place for CYOAs OC creation, and the kind of casual greentext that 4cuck jannies hte for some reason.
>this is just a /v/-tiet balkanization
This is nothing of the sort. The respetive topics had nothing to do with one another and very little conceptual synergy. Splitting them up from one another, and pairing them with more appropriate hybrid elements doesn't split u their own respective topics.
>We don't need more boards
The only really new element of this would be the /k/ element, and I know it has plenty of potential in this community. Otherwise, it's just giving due space to concepts
>It's already been like this for 4 years. Why change it?
I wasn't sure about /vx/ as a concept 4 years ago, and I'm certain we could do better now. I was prolific poster on /vx/ for years and I think I have a decent understanding of what elements of it are good and which ones have quite frankly been insubstantial. Just count all of the dead threads and failed conversations. We can do better than this.
>/vx/ is irrelevant to the main topics of /mlpol/, and thus its quality is low priority
This is a misconception. All of the topics currently smushed together on /vx/ can in some way or form be related to the topic of ponies or politics. Furthermore, these topics are hobbies that encourage user engagement and site participation: users shouldn't feel like they need to go to other chans to get a quality experience for those topics, so it is in the interest of th community to encourage discusson thereof.
>/mlpol/ is too small to sustain quality discussion of these topics, so why even bother?
This is an overstated and rather nihilist attitude that unortunately discorages some users here. If you compare /mlpol/ to a lot of other chans of simila kinds, we actually have quit a high post per day count. Similar alt chans of similar or smaller size are able to sustain boards like this with daily posts, so we certainly could too.
>we've already made too many new boards, and the last two we made are basiclly dead already. This well just be the same.
Quite frankly, I think /cyb/ and /ub/ suffer similar issues in being oo broad and unspecific of topics, but /vx/ is different because it possesses at least three already-present elements that are prolific enough o fill up catalogs on their own.
>If these boards are a success, they'd just attact newags and discord trannies
That's the same logic as saying that /vx/ itself would be bad for the site if it were good. Having good content that attracts users isn't always a bad thing. Besides, we still have our pornshield among other perks of this site that scare aay hostile invasion.
>You're a shill trying to damage our community!
I wouldn't have spent all this time typing if I didn't actully care about /mlpo/ and even /vx/. I just want our site to do better.
>That's such a big idea. I'm not sure if I'm comfortable with it...
It would be a big step, yes, but we coud take it slowly. We could take months planning it. Each board could even have its own conceptual thread on /qa/ as its planned.
>This is just more work for the Devteam who are already overburdened.
Making boards isn't as hard as it sounds. Any admin can do it.
>All these ideas suck
I cant say they're perfect, but we could talk about them to improve them to work them out.
>I am a user of /vx/ and am a fan of memes and threads that are uique the the board and wouldn't fit on any of these new ones.
I quite frankly don't know of any unique /vx/ memes, but if you're a fan of content unique to the concept of /vx/, please speak up! It's important to preserve any culture that this community has developed over the years.
>>6596
I addressed both of those points in post 2.
Traffick would improve if it were re-made, or stay the same at worst.
And in many ways, it is broken. It's been broken for years, but since it was low traffick nobody cared enough to fix it.
And despite what it looks like, our traffick is actually pretty high for an altchan. We could definitely pull this off.
>>6597
Also considered that. It's not nearly as as difficult to add a board to this site as you may think. Anyone with admin privileges can do it, and it can be done in a short amount of time.
I made this thread now so that we could discuss it and devs would have time to implement it, although I guess it should have been made years ago.
I addressed both of those points in post 2.
Traffick would improve if it were re-made, or stay the same at worst.
And in many ways, it is broken. It's been broken for years, but since it was low traffick nobody cared enough to fix it.
And despite what it looks like, our traffick is actually pretty high for an altchan. We could definitely pull this off.
>>6597
Also considered that. It's not nearly as as difficult to add a board to this site as you may think. Anyone with admin privileges can do it, and it can be done in a short amount of time.
I made this thread now so that we could discuss it and devs would have time to implement it, although I guess it should have been made years ago.
Anonymous
No.6599
>>6598
>It's not nearly as as difficult to add a board to this site as you may think
I guess it's up to staff then, i don't have hard opinions on the matter besides that
>It's not nearly as as difficult to add a board to this site as you may think
I guess it's up to staff then, i don't have hard opinions on the matter besides that
>>6594
>And yet, i distrust change.
Yeah, so do I, which is why I waited so long to propose it even though I really had the idea for basically exactly this three years ago.
Still, after considering what seems like every potential implication, i think the idea is worth doing.
>And yet, i distrust change.
Yeah, so do I, which is why I waited so long to propose it even though I really had the idea for basically exactly this three years ago.
Still, after considering what seems like every potential implication, i think the idea is worth doing.
>>6600
>which is why I waited so long to propose it even though
This has been proposed many times already, I suspect by the same fag.
>Still, after considering what seems like every potential implication, i think the idea is worth doing.
I do too. And the prospect is negative. No change is needed.
>which is why I waited so long to propose it even though
This has been proposed many times already, I suspect by the same fag.
>Still, after considering what seems like every potential implication, i think the idea is worth doing.
I do too. And the prospect is negative. No change is needed.
Anonymous
No.6602
>>6601
>prospect is negative
Elaborate.
>No change is needed.
I strongly disagree. /mlpol/ can do much better than this.
>prospect is negative
Elaborate.
>No change is needed.
I strongly disagree. /mlpol/ can do much better than this.
Anonymous
No.6604
Anonymous
No.6605
>>6601
>And the prospect is negative.
I'm really interested in this. Is there anything wrong with this that I didn't consider in the #2 post?
>And the prospect is negative.
I'm really interested in this. Is there anything wrong with this that I didn't consider in the #2 post?
>>6606
If you have any objections, please feel free to explain.
>>6607
I think so too. A very good thing if done well.
>>6608
I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any detrimental consequences for this move. If you found a potential bad consequence that I didn't address in the post above, please speak up about your concerns.
I'd also like to point out that archiving /vx/ could make the move completely reversible if we don't like how it plays out.
If you have any objections, please feel free to explain.
>>6607
I think so too. A very good thing if done well.
>>6608
I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any detrimental consequences for this move. If you found a potential bad consequence that I didn't address in the post above, please speak up about your concerns.
I'd also like to point out that archiving /vx/ could make the move completely reversible if we don't like how it plays out.
>>6609
>I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any detrimental consequences for this move.
I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any benefit for that move. Add to that the potential disruptions that will cause and disgruntled poners.
/mlpol/ is fine as it is. Just saying.
>I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any detrimental consequences for this move.
I've thought long and hard, and I haven't found any benefit for that move. Add to that the potential disruptions that will cause and disgruntled poners.
/mlpol/ is fine as it is. Just saying.
>>6612
>I haven't found any benefit for that move.
I just laid out all of the benefits. I actually had a few more, but I ran out of room, so I'll post more about that later.
>Add to that the potential disruptions that will cause and disgruntled poners.
I considered this in the post above. It would be a simple step for posters to continue their postings on the new boards with virtually no disruption, especially if the change were implemented with due warning and anticipation with the old board archived so that Anons could reference it whenever. Nobody should be excessively inconvenienced by the move.
>/mlpol/ is fine as it is.
/mlpol/ is great. The elements behind /vx/ could be greater.
>I haven't found any benefit for that move.
I just laid out all of the benefits. I actually had a few more, but I ran out of room, so I'll post more about that later.
>Add to that the potential disruptions that will cause and disgruntled poners.
I considered this in the post above. It would be a simple step for posters to continue their postings on the new boards with virtually no disruption, especially if the change were implemented with due warning and anticipation with the old board archived so that Anons could reference it whenever. Nobody should be excessively inconvenienced by the move.
>/mlpol/ is fine as it is.
/mlpol/ is great. The elements behind /vx/ could be greater.
>>6613
>/mlpol/ is great. The elements behind /vx/ could be greater.
Tampering the boards is bad idea.
>/mlpol/ is great. The elements behind /vx/ could be greater.
Tampering the boards is bad idea.
Anonymous
No.6619
Anonymous
No.6621
>8 UUIDs
I shouldn't have disabled post IDs on this thread. Idk what I was thinking...
I shouldn't have disabled post IDs on this thread. Idk what I was thinking...
Anonymous
No.6622
Should I make a new thread?
Anonymous
No.6666
Bring back /vint/.
Anonymous
No.7098
>>7096
I'm glad somebody agrees.
Not just for ttrpgs and games, but also just casual roleplay and roleplay threads. I think it's an untapped niche that we as a site could capitalize, especially since roleplay is banned on /mlp/.
I'm glad somebody agrees.
Not just for ttrpgs and games, but also just casual roleplay and roleplay threads. I think it's an untapped niche that we as a site could capitalize, especially since roleplay is banned on /mlp/.
Anonymous
No.7100
>>7099
OP here, no, that was another guy's idea. I have no real opinion on the other thing.
Also, I made this thread months ago.
OP here, no, that was another guy's idea. I have no real opinion on the other thing.
Also, I made this thread months ago.
why though? I have to browse /overboard/ to see more than 10 threads a day updated across the whole site, let alone /vx/
>>7101
Well, that's kind of the point. The current state of /vx/ doesn't encourage content creation or discussion on any of the 4-6 topics it covers, and those topics don't really mix together or complement well either.
Well, that's kind of the point. The current state of /vx/ doesn't encourage content creation or discussion on any of the 4-6 topics it covers, and those topics don't really mix together or complement well either.
Anonymous
No.7104
>>7103
>Autists don't need any of that.
That argument would be a lot more compelling if those topics actually got sufficient traffic on /vx/. I know that it's not from lack of interest.
>Autists don't need any of that.
That argument would be a lot more compelling if those topics actually got sufficient traffic on /vx/. I know that it's not from lack of interest.
Anonymous
No.7105
>>7101
The point is for the topics on /vx/ to actually get traffic and generate content.
Also I think /kx/ would be a good addition to the board.
The point is for the topics on /vx/ to actually get traffic and generate content.
Also I think /kx/ would be a good addition to the board.
Anonymous
No.7244
>>7243
I want a /k/ board too. I know for certain it would immediately be filled-up with content.
I like /kx/, because the idea of weaponizing schizos has so much meme potential.
I want a /k/ board too. I know for certain it would immediately be filled-up with content.
I like /kx/, because the idea of weaponizing schizos has so much meme potential.
Anonymous
No.7248
>>7243
It's a wasted opportunity that we're a right-wing pony chan and don't have a dedicated place for gun posting.
It's a wasted opportunity that we're a right-wing pony chan and don't have a dedicated place for gun posting.
Anonymous
No.7345
>>7103
>Autists don't need any of that.
Why? What's the purpose of this whole site if not to encourage autists to have fun?
>Autists don't need any of that.
Why? What's the purpose of this whole site if not to encourage autists to have fun?
Anonymous
No.7347
>ywn 3D Print pony guns unless pony /k/ becomes a thing
I also support the creation of a /k/ board, fellow domestic terrorists horsefuckers.
In fact, it would be so based if we had a thread where we could post pictures of our guns and the insides of our domiciles to pwn the libs. Bonus points if we combine it with an /o/ board. We could call it /ok/ and post pictures of our vehicles and weapons outside of our domiciles as well as discuss public meetups. That would be so based and marepilled, fellow Nazi horsefuckers. What could possibly go wrong?
In fact, it would be so based if we had a thread where we could post pictures of our guns and the insides of our domiciles to pwn the libs. Bonus points if we combine it with an /o/ board. We could call it /ok/ and post pictures of our vehicles and weapons outside of our domiciles as well as discuss public meetups. That would be so based and marepilled, fellow Nazi horsefuckers. What could possibly go wrong?
>>7349
I'm in more of the camp of making a /kx/, because combining gunposters and schizos makes for a dangerously based combo. It would also be a good way to cultivate a doomsday prepper community. I think /x/ would go better with /k/ them being smushed with fiction and fantasy games as it currently is with /vx/.
There's another thread about a potential /k/ board.
I'm in more of the camp of making a /kx/, because combining gunposters and schizos makes for a dangerously based combo. It would also be a good way to cultivate a doomsday prepper community. I think /x/ would go better with /k/ them being smushed with fiction and fantasy games as it currently is with /vx/.
There's another thread about a potential /k/ board.
>>7349
Public meetups are retarded, posting vehicles is retarded. Posting gun and gun info is better.
Public meetups are retarded, posting vehicles is retarded. Posting gun and gun info is better.
>>7350
>It would also be a good way to cultivate a doomsday prepper community.
I agree, fellow mare man! We could also work on assembling a militia and discussing guerilla warfare tactics! Based and redpilled!
>>7351
>Public meet ups are retarded
You don't want to be friends? That's not very loving and tolerant of you. How else could we organize and run drills?
>posting vehicles is retarded
How else will we identify one another at thehoneypot for retards stupid enough to post their guns on a /pol/ board friendship blowout? What, are you a glownigger trying to demoralize and discourage real life activism?
>>7352
No way, my fellow horse homie! I totally don't think that adding a /k/ board be would the single most self-destructive and retarded thing this site could possibly do. It's smartest idea I've ever heard, in fact... Glowniggers would really hate it if we did that!
>It would also be a good way to cultivate a doomsday prepper community.
I agree, fellow mare man! We could also work on assembling a militia and discussing guerilla warfare tactics! Based and redpilled!
>>7351
>Public meet ups are retarded
You don't want to be friends? That's not very loving and tolerant of you. How else could we organize and run drills?
>posting vehicles is retarded
How else will we identify one another at the
>>7352
No way, my fellow horse homie! I totally don't think that adding a /k/ board be would the single most self-destructive and retarded thing this site could possibly do. It's smartest idea I've ever heard, in fact... Glowniggers would really hate it if we did that!
>>7353
Consider moving this discussion to Lotus's thread about the /k/ board. This thread is about the proposal to split up /vx/.
Consider moving this discussion to Lotus's thread about the /k/ board. This thread is about the proposal to split up /vx/.
>>7353
There are no serial numbers on 3D printed guns. Feds cannot track us through our 3D printed guns if we download the gun files using tor.
There are no serial numbers on 3D printed guns. Feds cannot track us through our 3D printed guns if we download the gun files using tor.
>>7355
You do realize that feds swarm all over anything related to 3d guns like flies on shit, don't you? Of all the places you could post firearms and general weaponry shit, why would you specifically want to do it here? There are countless other sites you could do it on rather than practically inviting bad actors here with your ass in the air and snacks on the table.
Mixing /k/ with /pol/ will lead to fedposting and gay ops that will destroy this site. You can't possibly be myopic enough to not see how readily it would be exploited.
>>7354
I completely understand if mods need to move this discussion.
You do realize that feds swarm all over anything related to 3d guns like flies on shit, don't you? Of all the places you could post firearms and general weaponry shit, why would you specifically want to do it here? There are countless other sites you could do it on rather than practically inviting bad actors here with your ass in the air and snacks on the table.
Mixing /k/ with /pol/ will lead to fedposting and gay ops that will destroy this site. You can't possibly be myopic enough to not see how readily it would be exploited.
>>7354
I completely understand if mods need to move this discussion.
>>6590
I would like to bring to any horsefucker attention the unrelentless push to atomize /mlpol/ in a million pieces, given the size of the community, such a push will unavoidable create still more ghost boards and reduce its activity as a whole.
Take a look at the latest campaign to drive /pol/ posting out. Such a harassment campaign is not random and requires administrative action to neutralize it.
I would like to bring to any horsefucker attention the unrelentless push to atomize /mlpol/ in a million pieces, given the size of the community, such a push will unavoidable create still more ghost boards and reduce its activity as a whole.
Take a look at the latest campaign to drive /pol/ posting out. Such a harassment campaign is not random and requires administrative action to neutralize it.
Anonymous
No.7359
>>7358
>create still more ghost boards and reduce its activity as a whole.
That is a valid concern, but I disagree. /vx/ elements could be so much better than the board is now.
>create still more ghost boards and reduce its activity as a whole.
That is a valid concern, but I disagree. /vx/ elements could be so much better than the board is now.
Anonymous
No.7364
>>7358
Pretty much this. Off boarders are obviously trying to pit /pol/ and /mlp/ against each other as /mlp/ is autistic and most of nu /pol/ is literally retarded.
It's seem inevitable that the site will die a slow death of a thousand cuts at this point. That's assuming the current board natives aren't smart enough to avoid the bait, which """we""" obviously aren't. It seems like the flash in the pan moment that lead to /mlpol/ may be over as times, and anons, have changed. The short bus is finally running out of gas and a lot of anons are still in denial.
It's been a fun ride at least.
Pretty much this. Off boarders are obviously trying to pit /pol/ and /mlp/ against each other as /mlp/ is autistic and most of nu /pol/ is literally retarded.
It's seem inevitable that the site will die a slow death of a thousand cuts at this point. That's assuming the current board natives aren't smart enough to avoid the bait, which """we""" obviously aren't. It seems like the flash in the pan moment that lead to /mlpol/ may be over as times, and anons, have changed. The short bus is finally running out of gas and a lot of anons are still in denial.
It's been a fun ride at least.
I don't trust whoever wants ponies split from politics. But there can be no cool gun threads and pony gun threads until /k/ exists or gets merged with something funny.
/fitlit/ was a good idea. What was /k/ merged with back when /mlpol/ was on 4chan?
/fitlit/ was a good idea. What was /k/ merged with back when /mlpol/ was on 4chan?
Anonymous
No.7367
>>7366
The other thread is about the /k/ board. This thread is about splitting up /vx/, with a passing suggestion of /kx/. It's not the primary topic.
I want /vint/ and /hp/.
The other thread is about the /k/ board. This thread is about splitting up /vx/, with a passing suggestion of /kx/. It's not the primary topic.
I want /vint/ and /hp/.
Anonymous
No.7368
>>7366
I don't trust you, because I don't know what bunker chan is. Where are people supposed to go for their pony gun content? How am I supposed to get Rainbow Dash stickers that will perfectly fit a 3D Printed gun?
I don't trust you, because I don't know what bunker chan is. Where are people supposed to go for their pony gun content? How am I supposed to get Rainbow Dash stickers that will perfectly fit a 3D Printed gun?
Since the staff have demonstrated willingness to revise the site lately, could we reopen the conversation to clean up, replace, and/or reform /vx/?
>>9720
/vx/ should be made into /games/ which includes both table top and vidya and just make a regular ol' /x/ board.
/vx/ should be made into /games/ which includes both table top and vidya and just make a regular ol' /x/ board.
>>9735
Yeah, at the very least split /v/ from the /x/. Combining tabletop/Vidya with /x/ does /x/ no justice, because it just contributes to the fake, larpy nature.
Imo, roleplay is such a large faction that it could be its own board.
Maybe split if /x/ and merge it with /k/, for /kx/ schizoposting.
Most of the catalog of /vx/ could really just be archived. It's all dead threads.
Yeah, at the very least split /v/ from the /x/. Combining tabletop/Vidya with /x/ does /x/ no justice, because it just contributes to the fake, larpy nature.
Imo, roleplay is such a large faction that it could be its own board.
Maybe split if /x/ and merge it with /k/, for /kx/ schizoposting.
Most of the catalog of /vx/ could really just be archived. It's all dead threads.
>>6590
I miss teacher-anon drawings, does anyone have the full comic to this point?
>>9767
>contributes to the fake, larpy nature.
As an ex /x/phile, thats great. Keep the "no one" schizos away by keeping the board light-hearted.
/x/ used to be a spooky board for spooky stuff, including spooky stories, curses, paranormal stuff, you name it.
And since /vx/ is already a dead board, what would be the point in making a split? You will just end-up with 2 dead boards instead of one, like cyb, for example.
I miss teacher-anon drawings, does anyone have the full comic to this point?
>>9767
>contributes to the fake, larpy nature.
As an ex /x/phile, thats great. Keep the "no one" schizos away by keeping the board light-hearted.
/x/ used to be a spooky board for spooky stuff, including spooky stories, curses, paranormal stuff, you name it.
And since /vx/ is already a dead board, what would be the point in making a split? You will just end-up with 2 dead boards instead of one, like cyb, for example.
>>9768
>As an ex /x/phile, thats great. Keep the "no one" schizos away by keeping the board light-hearted.
Maybe, but some other /x/philes don't appreciate having their serious discussions conflated with D&D silliness.
Similarly, some oldfags ttrpg enjoyers still remember the Satanic Panic, and don't necessarily appreciate their fantasy magic being conflated with actual occultism.
I am not s regular /x/ user, so I can't really speak for /x/, but after using /vx/ as a regular for 8 years, I haven't seen a lot of synergy.
>And since /vx/ is already a dead board, what would be the point in making a split? You will just end-up with 2 dead boards instead of one, like /cyb/
A fresh board is better than an old dead board with threads from 8 years ago. An old dead board acts like a gangrenous limb and actually quashes content creation; because new users visit the board, see that it's been dead for years, and then give up on it because they have no interest in necrobuming ancient threads made by anyone no longer present. /vx/ is especially egregious, because it has an endless catalog with old threads stating forever even though they should be archived.
With new boards, people would at least see them as a blank slate with potential to fill with their own content (at least at first), instead of an ominous graveyard better left undisturbed.
Imo, /cyb/ could just be deleted, and only be remade if anons with interest in actually posting to it request that it be made again for /g/ posting. Idk though.
>As an ex /x/phile, thats great. Keep the "no one" schizos away by keeping the board light-hearted.
Maybe, but some other /x/philes don't appreciate having their serious discussions conflated with D&D silliness.
Similarly, some oldfags ttrpg enjoyers still remember the Satanic Panic, and don't necessarily appreciate their fantasy magic being conflated with actual occultism.
I am not s regular /x/ user, so I can't really speak for /x/, but after using /vx/ as a regular for 8 years, I haven't seen a lot of synergy.
>And since /vx/ is already a dead board, what would be the point in making a split? You will just end-up with 2 dead boards instead of one, like /cyb/
A fresh board is better than an old dead board with threads from 8 years ago. An old dead board acts like a gangrenous limb and actually quashes content creation; because new users visit the board, see that it's been dead for years, and then give up on it because they have no interest in necrobuming ancient threads made by anyone no longer present. /vx/ is especially egregious, because it has an endless catalog with old threads stating forever even though they should be archived.
With new boards, people would at least see them as a blank slate with potential to fill with their own content (at least at first), instead of an ominous graveyard better left undisturbed.
Imo, /cyb/ could just be deleted, and only be remade if anons with interest in actually posting to it request that it be made again for /g/ posting. Idk though.
>>9883
>Do not mix guns and schizophrenia.
Sometimes it's fun to mix guns and schizophrenia.
>>9771
>With new boards, people would at least see them as a blank slate with potential to fill with their own content (at least at first), instead of an ominous graveyard better left undisturbed.
I do agree that a board full of dead threads is not particularly interesting for anons, but a new, empty board that gets less than 10 threads a week is also not really interesting.
I see many altchans create a ton of boards, and in the end only have 1 or 2 actually active ones, I don't think mlpol has enough traffic to sub-divide discussion into many, many boards, that's my point.
Your points are valid, thought, I don't usually think much of the sensibilities of the posters because, well, I'm desensitized to it so it does not make much sense in my brain, so I got to give it to you, /tg/ would probably hate occult stuff alongside their board stuff, and /x/ schizos would hate LARP besides their 'totally very serious' occult stuff.
>Do not mix guns and schizophrenia.
Sometimes it's fun to mix guns and schizophrenia.
>>9771
>With new boards, people would at least see them as a blank slate with potential to fill with their own content (at least at first), instead of an ominous graveyard better left undisturbed.
I do agree that a board full of dead threads is not particularly interesting for anons, but a new, empty board that gets less than 10 threads a week is also not really interesting.
I see many altchans create a ton of boards, and in the end only have 1 or 2 actually active ones, I don't think mlpol has enough traffic to sub-divide discussion into many, many boards, that's my point.
Your points are valid, thought, I don't usually think much of the sensibilities of the posters because, well, I'm desensitized to it so it does not make much sense in my brain, so I got to give it to you, /tg/ would probably hate occult stuff alongside their board stuff, and /x/ schizos would hate LARP besides their 'totally very serious' occult stuff.
Maybe turn /vx/ into /vq/ video games and quests and then make /x/ into a stand alone board.
Anonymous
No.10333
>>10334
/kx/ is asking for the site to get shut down. Maybe /xo/ cars and paranormal would be less harmful and still potentially a lot of fun.
/kx/ is asking for the site to get shut down. Maybe /xo/ cars and paranormal would be less harmful and still potentially a lot of fun.
>>10335
>/kx/ is asking for the site to get shut down
Just don't post illegal content. We have mods here.
>harmful
Nothing is harmful about guns.
>/kx/ is asking for the site to get shut down
Just don't post illegal content. We have mods here.
>harmful
Nothing is harmful about guns.
>>10337
The mentally ill are legally prevented from owning guns. Red flag laws will get an /xk/ board shut down. I don't see why we couldn't just have a separate stand alone /k/ board in addition to /xo/. We have an /a/ board. Besides /xo/ kisses and hugs. It makes for a safe space to talk about ghosts and cars.
The mentally ill are legally prevented from owning guns. Red flag laws will get an /xk/ board shut down. I don't see why we couldn't just have a separate stand alone /k/ board in addition to /xo/. We have an /a/ board. Besides /xo/ kisses and hugs. It makes for a safe space to talk about ghosts and cars.
>>10338
>The mentally ill are legally prevented from owning guns. Red flag laws will get an /xk/ board shut down.
That's not how red flag laws work.
>I don't see why we couldn't just have a separate stand alone /k/ board in addition to /xo/.
Why even bother combining /x/ and /o/ then?
>The mentally ill are legally prevented from owning guns. Red flag laws will get an /xk/ board shut down.
That's not how red flag laws work.
>I don't see why we couldn't just have a separate stand alone /k/ board in addition to /xo/.
Why even bother combining /x/ and /o/ then?
Anonymous
No.10340
Make sure you don't speak wrongly of Mlpol-tan
Anonymous
No.10341
>ban evading
Do not speak ill or wrongly of Mlpol-tan
Do not speak ill or wrongly of Mlpol-tan
>>10339
>That's not how red flag laws work.
Schizophrenia and guns don't mix and could get the site shut down. I don't know why that isn't obvious to you.
>Why even bother combining /x/ and /o/ then?
I guess we don't have to, but I thought /xo/ sounded fun and schizos love pattern seeking so cars would be fun for them and this community doesn't have anywhere to discuss cars.
>That's not how red flag laws work.
Schizophrenia and guns don't mix and could get the site shut down. I don't know why that isn't obvious to you.
>Why even bother combining /x/ and /o/ then?
I guess we don't have to, but I thought /xo/ sounded fun and schizos love pattern seeking so cars would be fun for them and this community doesn't have anywhere to discuss cars.
>>10342
>Schizophrenia and guns don't mix
Untrue.
>could get the site shut down
How?
Just scrub any illegal content on sight. Jannies scrub the cheese pizza bots every day. They can scrub schizo's posting illegal content.
>Schizophrenia and guns don't mix
Untrue.
>could get the site shut down
How?
Just scrub any illegal content on sight. Jannies scrub the cheese pizza bots every day. They can scrub schizo's posting illegal content.
FEMOID ALERT!!!
WTF is this shit? Why trying to scramble/unscramble the boards again? Why making modifications? Why trying to embed a guns board again?
BTW, I know pretty well the answers/excuses and I'm not impressed.
Let everything how it is for Celestia's sake.
WTF is this shit? Why trying to scramble/unscramble the boards again? Why making modifications? Why trying to embed a guns board again?
BTW, I know pretty well the answers/excuses and I'm not impressed.
Let everything how it is for Celestia's sake.
Anonymous
No.10348
>>10346
>Why trying to embed a guns board again?
Because 4chan /k/ has been unusable since the war in Ukraine.
>Why trying to embed a guns board again?
Because 4chan /k/ has been unusable since the war in Ukraine.
And here's another suggestion. Make ninjaz a mod on the /vq/ and/or /ox/ boards so he can have his own little space to protect without destroying the rest of the site.
>>10351
>on a board full of schizophrenia.
The schizo's are here whether you like it or not. They are already on the site, and will be, especially so long as there is an /x/ board of any kind.
>>10350
This.
I was against /vx/ in its inception, and although I went on to be one of the most prolific posters there, I still think it could be better.
Also, the board is overdue for renovations anyway. Every thread ever made there is still on the catalog. The dead threads should be archived.
>>10352
That is a terrible idea. Do not humor him.
>on a board full of schizophrenia.
The schizo's are here whether you like it or not. They are already on the site, and will be, especially so long as there is an /x/ board of any kind.
>>10350
This.
I was against /vx/ in its inception, and although I went on to be one of the most prolific posters there, I still think it could be better.
Also, the board is overdue for renovations anyway. Every thread ever made there is still on the catalog. The dead threads should be archived.
>>10352
That is a terrible idea. Do not humor him.
>>10353
I'm not humoring him. I think ninjaz is fucking retarded and has very serious character flaws BUT he does care about the part of the community he participates in. I think he would make a decent janny on a /vq/ or /ox/ board. I will even volunteer to be a mod on the /ox/ board because I know a bit about cars and can keep him in check. If accepted I would also like to moderate /cyb/ even though it is mostly dead.
I'm not humoring him. I think ninjaz is fucking retarded and has very serious character flaws BUT he does care about the part of the community he participates in. I think he would make a decent janny on a /vq/ or /ox/ board. I will even volunteer to be a mod on the /ox/ board because I know a bit about cars and can keep him in check. If accepted I would also like to moderate /cyb/ even though it is mostly dead.
>>10353
>The schizo's are here whether you like it or not. They are already on the site, and will be
Yes they will, but let's not tempt fate by making the weapons board also the schizo board.
>The schizo's are here whether you like it or not. They are already on the site, and will be
Yes they will, but let's not tempt fate by making the weapons board also the schizo board.
Anonymous
No.10357
>>10355
I am going to go to bat for him even though I don't like him. I've actually met the dude IRL. He cares for a lot of people and animals. He is an idiot, but he isn't a bad person. I think if given his own little slice where he can't destroy the rest of the site he would mellow out. He doesn't come here to discuss politics. He comes here to RP and talk about /x/ shit. He helped the site get started with funding and he does care about this community even if he is a moron.
I am going to go to bat for him even though I don't like him. I've actually met the dude IRL. He cares for a lot of people and animals. He is an idiot, but he isn't a bad person. I think if given his own little slice where he can't destroy the rest of the site he would mellow out. He doesn't come here to discuss politics. He comes here to RP and talk about /x/ shit. He helped the site get started with funding and he does care about this community even if he is a moron.
>>10360
>He is an idiot, but he isn't a bad person.
I agree, but he has a mayor problem, he can't refrain himself from antagonizing the management and that's a no-no. In other words, he is suffering from low-impulse control and gets him in trouble over and over again.
>He is an idiot, but he isn't a bad person.
I agree, but he has a mayor problem, he can't refrain himself from antagonizing the management and that's a no-no. In other words, he is suffering from low-impulse control and gets him in trouble over and over again.
>>10361
No
>>10362
I think adding him to management would make him understand the shit that mods get especially if he was given a low position in a small board where he was one of the primary users. What makes /mlpol/ great is that the mods are users of the site.
No
>>10362
I think adding him to management would make him understand the shit that mods get especially if he was given a low position in a small board where he was one of the primary users. What makes /mlpol/ great is that the mods are users of the site.
>>10364
>I think adding him to management
Wasn't he the one expelled for betraying the user's privacy?
>I think adding him to management
Wasn't he the one expelled for betraying the user's privacy?
>>10366
is V really exist in that thread? no one really talks about video games , or even if they do , it is a pony game related
just saying
is V really exist in that thread? no one really talks about video games , or even if they do , it is a pony game related
just saying
Ribozyme
No.10374
>>10368
I see. The /vint/ idea is good especially if it informally includes /qst/ stuff. And a stand alone /x/ could work. But then there is no board for guns or cars. /ko/?
I see. The /vint/ idea is good especially if it informally includes /qst/ stuff. And a stand alone /x/ could work. But then there is no board for guns or cars. /ko/?
where do we even talk about humanities stuff?
history , philosophy , language , etc etc
history , philosophy , language , etc etc
>>10370
Maybe janny positions would be better than mod positions for ninjaz or myself.
>>10375
/mlpol/ and /ub/ a stand alone /x/ board could host religious discussions too.
Maybe janny positions would be better than mod positions for ninjaz or myself.
>>10375
/mlpol/ and /ub/ a stand alone /x/ board could host religious discussions too.
>>10378
/sp/ is more or less our /b/ board. I was the one who suggested we make something like /b/ and I'm glad /sp/ turned out the way it did. It really is something unique.
/sp/ is more or less our /b/ board. I was the one who suggested we make something like /b/ and I'm glad /sp/ turned out the way it did. It really is something unique.
Ribozyme
No.10382
>>10381
I actually was. I remember when the 4troons jannies shut down the board too. I also remember the round of /qa/ raids where we actually found some common ground with some of the /jp/sies.
I actually was. I remember when the 4troons jannies shut down the board too. I also remember the round of /qa/ raids where we actually found some common ground with some of the /jp/sies.
Anonymous
No.10385
>>10383
>>10384
Wtf?
>>10384
Wtf?
Anonymous
No.10386
>>10383
Please tell me you didn't kill anyone.
Please tell me you didn't kill anyone.
Anonymous
No.10387
>>10384
Nobody is dead, right?
Nobody is dead, right?
Anonymous
No.10388
>>10383
did not you said that in /1ntr/ already? like yesterday
did not you said that in /1ntr/ already? like yesterday
Anonymous
No.10392
But yes, the doggos got kill
Anonymous
No.10393
>>10360
>He cares for a lot of people and animals
Dude, his insane rantings over the past two days have largely been about him killing a dog. He has sent me multiple threats of violence through reports. Fuck no he does not care for people.
I used to play a game with him. He brought so much drama to the game that it was affecting my mental health and made me want to quit. I opened up about how the drama was affecting my mental health, and everyone was sympathetic except for him, who just continued insane rantings, completely tone death. No, I really don't think he cares for anything except that he likes to be angry.
You're right that he doesn't come here to discuss politics. Close everything that he's posted on the board this year has been him ranting about one thing or another that made him angry. That's why he's banned. Because I told him to stop ranting about how much he hates some particular person for a while, and he couldn't go more than 20 hours without spamming the discord or the board with how much he hates that person.
>He cares for a lot of people and animals
Dude, his insane rantings over the past two days have largely been about him killing a dog. He has sent me multiple threats of violence through reports. Fuck no he does not care for people.
I used to play a game with him. He brought so much drama to the game that it was affecting my mental health and made me want to quit. I opened up about how the drama was affecting my mental health, and everyone was sympathetic except for him, who just continued insane rantings, completely tone death. No, I really don't think he cares for anything except that he likes to be angry.
You're right that he doesn't come here to discuss politics. Close everything that he's posted on the board this year has been him ranting about one thing or another that made him angry. That's why he's banned. Because I told him to stop ranting about how much he hates some particular person for a while, and he couldn't go more than 20 hours without spamming the discord or the board with how much he hates that person.
>>10364
>>10354
Did you not know that he actually was on staff at one point?
Back in 2018 I asked to have him added since he was a friend. I don’t think he was so messed up in the head at the time. He was fairly good at finding spam since he was always online and was attentive to the board. The first problems arise when he attempted to interact with other staff members. Staff rules at the time required moderation actions to be posted in the staff chat, either for discussion or at least for notice that an action has already taken place. So he’d make a post about something going on in some thread, but it would be vague and not detailed enough to know what was going on unless you were there, in that thread. However, most of the staff members have lives and jobs, so we didn’t necessarily know exactly what was going on when he referenced things. We’d ask clarifying questions, and he’d get pissed off at us for not already knowing what he was talking about.
One day, he rage quit the discord server. But he didn’t quit staff. Instead, he would engage in moderation activities like banning and deleting posts while refusing to even be able to communicate to other staff members. Again, this was not acceptable under staff rules. He wouod post about actions in a discord server that was not relayed to staff. When I asked him about it, he said “every member of staff that I respect is in that server.”
One day I got a message from Pupperwoff saying we needed to talk about him. I was expecting pupper to say that he needed to be fired. That is what I had thought, given how blatantly he was ignoring staff rules. But instead, they were going to make him an admin.
Apparently, he had told Pupper or maybe it was Atlas (the founder) that he must either be made admin or quit. They came up with some whole complicated arrangement with Atlas stepping down, Pupper as the new site owner, and then three administrators, with the theory that there would be a 2-1 vote on any more serious actions. I thought all of this was a terrible idea and was very much against it, t everyone else made it happen.
The first major blow up he had was against, of all people, Pupper. He decided one day to take a users post and edit its contents to something along the lines of “I’m a faggot.” Pupper absolutely hated this and was vehemently against it. He insisted that it was allowed by staff rules and that it was fine. Now, I actually agreed with him over Pupper in this, because that user (it was probably Nigel) deserved it, but I knew that Pupper was very much invested in “no edits,” so the proper thing to do would have been to just agree not to do it again. But he couldn’t do that. Instead, he argued for hours and developed some kind of vendetta against pupper. Pupper actually reciprocated the negative feelings. If you don’t know Pupper, please know that he’s very kind and extremely difficult to rouse to a lasting anger. Pissing him of all people off is a rare accomplishment. He also managed to piss off another member of staff who was already calling for him to be removed.
I had my own problems with him. He loved to get into arguments with people on the board, and then post in moderator capcodes as what I assume is some kind of show of force to win the argument. Besides this, he would post in capcodes often and very unprofessionally, posting things like vague threats. He would do this anonymously. I wanted to ban all anonymous-cap code posting and force him to use a name. Of course this didn’t come to anything because he refused any limit of any kind on his behavior.
He developed grudges against every member of staff who expressed any problem with anything he did, which was the great majority of the staff. He was purely vitriolic in every conversation in staff chat. After one especially bad discussion where he was incredibly rude to everyone, Pupper declared that he was removed from Admin rank. He claimed Pupper couldn’t do this under the rules, but obviously no one was against this move. I tried to mediate between him and Pupper to see if they could come to some kind of agreement or détente. When I asked what his demand were, it was very clear. He wanted to be allowed to moderate the board however he pleased with no limits or restrictions of anyone disagreeing with how he acted. Obviously this was not going to come to anything.
One day I saw him getting into an argument with someone, and at the end of it, deleted that users post. I was going to recommend he be fired, but before I could do that, he had left staff chat and had sent a different moderator a message that he had quit. Pupper was sure to disable his moderator account. He would start sending messages in reports about how he respected the 1/3 of moderators who didn’t talk in staff chat or didn’t engage in arguments, but didn’t respect most of the staff members, who of course took issue with his behavior.
Over the next couple years he’d go on screeds against staff, like one time claiming he was exposing some giant staff conspiracy by talking about the /Test/ board.
I went back through old messages and screencaps. He was just as much of a vitriolic rager in 2021 and 2023 as he is now. No change, really.
No I don’t think he’s fit for staff.
>>10354
Did you not know that he actually was on staff at one point?
Back in 2018 I asked to have him added since he was a friend. I don’t think he was so messed up in the head at the time. He was fairly good at finding spam since he was always online and was attentive to the board. The first problems arise when he attempted to interact with other staff members. Staff rules at the time required moderation actions to be posted in the staff chat, either for discussion or at least for notice that an action has already taken place. So he’d make a post about something going on in some thread, but it would be vague and not detailed enough to know what was going on unless you were there, in that thread. However, most of the staff members have lives and jobs, so we didn’t necessarily know exactly what was going on when he referenced things. We’d ask clarifying questions, and he’d get pissed off at us for not already knowing what he was talking about.
One day, he rage quit the discord server. But he didn’t quit staff. Instead, he would engage in moderation activities like banning and deleting posts while refusing to even be able to communicate to other staff members. Again, this was not acceptable under staff rules. He wouod post about actions in a discord server that was not relayed to staff. When I asked him about it, he said “every member of staff that I respect is in that server.”
One day I got a message from Pupperwoff saying we needed to talk about him. I was expecting pupper to say that he needed to be fired. That is what I had thought, given how blatantly he was ignoring staff rules. But instead, they were going to make him an admin.
Apparently, he had told Pupper or maybe it was Atlas (the founder) that he must either be made admin or quit. They came up with some whole complicated arrangement with Atlas stepping down, Pupper as the new site owner, and then three administrators, with the theory that there would be a 2-1 vote on any more serious actions. I thought all of this was a terrible idea and was very much against it, t everyone else made it happen.
The first major blow up he had was against, of all people, Pupper. He decided one day to take a users post and edit its contents to something along the lines of “I’m a faggot.” Pupper absolutely hated this and was vehemently against it. He insisted that it was allowed by staff rules and that it was fine. Now, I actually agreed with him over Pupper in this, because that user (it was probably Nigel) deserved it, but I knew that Pupper was very much invested in “no edits,” so the proper thing to do would have been to just agree not to do it again. But he couldn’t do that. Instead, he argued for hours and developed some kind of vendetta against pupper. Pupper actually reciprocated the negative feelings. If you don’t know Pupper, please know that he’s very kind and extremely difficult to rouse to a lasting anger. Pissing him of all people off is a rare accomplishment. He also managed to piss off another member of staff who was already calling for him to be removed.
I had my own problems with him. He loved to get into arguments with people on the board, and then post in moderator capcodes as what I assume is some kind of show of force to win the argument. Besides this, he would post in capcodes often and very unprofessionally, posting things like vague threats. He would do this anonymously. I wanted to ban all anonymous-cap code posting and force him to use a name. Of course this didn’t come to anything because he refused any limit of any kind on his behavior.
He developed grudges against every member of staff who expressed any problem with anything he did, which was the great majority of the staff. He was purely vitriolic in every conversation in staff chat. After one especially bad discussion where he was incredibly rude to everyone, Pupper declared that he was removed from Admin rank. He claimed Pupper couldn’t do this under the rules, but obviously no one was against this move. I tried to mediate between him and Pupper to see if they could come to some kind of agreement or détente. When I asked what his demand were, it was very clear. He wanted to be allowed to moderate the board however he pleased with no limits or restrictions of anyone disagreeing with how he acted. Obviously this was not going to come to anything.
One day I saw him getting into an argument with someone, and at the end of it, deleted that users post. I was going to recommend he be fired, but before I could do that, he had left staff chat and had sent a different moderator a message that he had quit. Pupper was sure to disable his moderator account. He would start sending messages in reports about how he respected the 1/3 of moderators who didn’t talk in staff chat or didn’t engage in arguments, but didn’t respect most of the staff members, who of course took issue with his behavior.
Over the next couple years he’d go on screeds against staff, like one time claiming he was exposing some giant staff conspiracy by talking about the /Test/ board.
I went back through old messages and screencaps. He was just as much of a vitriolic rager in 2021 and 2023 as he is now. No change, really.
No I don’t think he’s fit for staff.
>>10360
> I think if given his own little slice where he can't destroy the rest of the site he would mellow out.
I have tried so very, very hard over several months this year to get him to stop intentionally disrupting threads he didn’t like and to mellow out, and he unequivocally refused He has been told repeatedly, “post anywhere you like, just leave us alone here” and he’s refused. He’s been told repeatedly “I need you to just stop constantly spraying angry posts” and he’s refused.
A different staff member put it best:
He is “like the autistic kid who sits in the back of the car shouting about how his brother was on his side of the seat for a fraction of a second, and it's the greatest injustice in history, and then will just keep ranting about it for the next four hours nonstop, no matter what you say to him… Like all I want to do is just pull the car over at the next rest stop, "accidentally" forget him in the bathroom, drive to the nearest bar and down an entire quart of tequila, and hope the situation just sorts itself out somehow.”
This has been ongoing for more than four years. You have no idea. He was actually banned off of the website back in 2023. And I’ve found ban evading posts from that time where he’s promising “ I will do what I please.” He was allowed back on in September of 2024 because he sounded sincerely apologetic. We were hoping he’d have decent behavior. Instead, he’s worse than before. So he’s definitely not allowed back. We know he does not want to control himself, and he probably cannot.
> I think if given his own little slice where he can't destroy the rest of the site he would mellow out.
I have tried so very, very hard over several months this year to get him to stop intentionally disrupting threads he didn’t like and to mellow out, and he unequivocally refused He has been told repeatedly, “post anywhere you like, just leave us alone here” and he’s refused. He’s been told repeatedly “I need you to just stop constantly spraying angry posts” and he’s refused.
A different staff member put it best:
He is “like the autistic kid who sits in the back of the car shouting about how his brother was on his side of the seat for a fraction of a second, and it's the greatest injustice in history, and then will just keep ranting about it for the next four hours nonstop, no matter what you say to him… Like all I want to do is just pull the car over at the next rest stop, "accidentally" forget him in the bathroom, drive to the nearest bar and down an entire quart of tequila, and hope the situation just sorts itself out somehow.”
This has been ongoing for more than four years. You have no idea. He was actually banned off of the website back in 2023. And I’ve found ban evading posts from that time where he’s promising “ I will do what I please.” He was allowed back on in September of 2024 because he sounded sincerely apologetic. We were hoping he’d have decent behavior. Instead, he’s worse than before. So he’s definitely not allowed back. We know he does not want to control himself, and he probably cannot.
BoomBoom
No.10399
Anonymous
No.10401
>>10397
damn , that sounded traumatizing for you anon
sorry to hear that
about thr animal abuse , i have a feeling he is just being edgy for attention , i hope
damn , that sounded traumatizing for you anon
sorry to hear that
about thr animal abuse , i have a feeling he is just being edgy for attention , i hope
>>10360
Here is my take on him, for whatever it's worth. He can be a decent enough guy when he wants to be. The problem is that most of the time he chooses to be a gigantic, gaping asshole instead. He is impossible to work with and has burned literally every bridge that has ever been extended to him. Bringing him back on as a mod or janny in any capacity I can tell you right away is a non-starter; not one single person currently on staff would support it.
He gets insanely angry over the smallest, stupidest things. He takes minor squabbles over these small, stupid things, and turns them into long, drawn out arguments that go on five-ever, until eventually you just get exhausted and stop replying to him. An argument with Ninjas is basically an argument with a screeching, incoherent toddler who refuses to yield any ground, no matter how ridiculous or indefensible his position may be.
He can't handle having any limits imposed on him at all. He will start brawls over the smallest things, and hold grudges long past their reasonable expiration dates. Some of his recent tirades reference events from the Mixed Nuts thread, which literally hasn't existed in years. As >>10397 hi lotus explains, when he was on staff he was constantly picking fights with everyone and turning minor policy disagreements into shouting matches that went on for hours. Even Pupper, who is probably the nicest guy in the world, lost his temper with him a few times. He sabotages himself by alienating literally everyone who tries to meet him halfway, including people who might be on his side of an argument or at the very least would be willing to hear him out. Then he acts like he's being treated unfairly when he ends up getting banned/disciplined/admin credentials revoked/whatever because he won't stop acting like an insufferable cunt.
To cite a recent example, a couple of months ago he was involved in some kind of altercation with another user in one of the game threads, and was apparently being a big enough dick about it that he wound up getting banned I don't really pay attention to the game threads so I don't know the specifics; at this point it doesn't really matter since he's ban-evaded so many times the reason for the initial ban is completely beside the point. Instead of just accepting his ban or working his differences out with the relevant parties, he's chosen to ban-evade on a near daily basis while thumbing his nose at mods, and spam our reports and appeals systems with incoherent rants and vague personal threats. He's also been rapid-firing angry Discord PMs at me for the last couple of months. I stopped replying to him ages ago; it doesn't phase him a bit, he just keeps shouting into the void. As with his reports and ban appeals, his PMs are completely incoherent and unhinged. In fact, to this day, I still have no idea wtf he's actually angry about, because he's never bothered to clarify any of it; he just keeps ranting about how his ban was unfair, and how he's going to "expose the truth" about all of us.
And for the record I want to clarify: even with all of this, I honestly do not harbor any personal grudge against him. I just want nothing the fuck to do with him anymore, because he's made it clear that he's completely off his nut. This goes way beyond simple quirky internet autism; the guy has actual mental health problems and needs actual psychiatric help.
Here is my take on him, for whatever it's worth. He can be a decent enough guy when he wants to be. The problem is that most of the time he chooses to be a gigantic, gaping asshole instead. He is impossible to work with and has burned literally every bridge that has ever been extended to him. Bringing him back on as a mod or janny in any capacity I can tell you right away is a non-starter; not one single person currently on staff would support it.
He gets insanely angry over the smallest, stupidest things. He takes minor squabbles over these small, stupid things, and turns them into long, drawn out arguments that go on five-ever, until eventually you just get exhausted and stop replying to him. An argument with Ninjas is basically an argument with a screeching, incoherent toddler who refuses to yield any ground, no matter how ridiculous or indefensible his position may be.
He can't handle having any limits imposed on him at all. He will start brawls over the smallest things, and hold grudges long past their reasonable expiration dates. Some of his recent tirades reference events from the Mixed Nuts thread, which literally hasn't existed in years. As >>10397 hi lotus explains, when he was on staff he was constantly picking fights with everyone and turning minor policy disagreements into shouting matches that went on for hours. Even Pupper, who is probably the nicest guy in the world, lost his temper with him a few times. He sabotages himself by alienating literally everyone who tries to meet him halfway, including people who might be on his side of an argument or at the very least would be willing to hear him out. Then he acts like he's being treated unfairly when he ends up getting banned/disciplined/admin credentials revoked/whatever because he won't stop acting like an insufferable cunt.
To cite a recent example, a couple of months ago he was involved in some kind of altercation with another user in one of the game threads, and was apparently being a big enough dick about it that he wound up getting banned I don't really pay attention to the game threads so I don't know the specifics; at this point it doesn't really matter since he's ban-evaded so many times the reason for the initial ban is completely beside the point. Instead of just accepting his ban or working his differences out with the relevant parties, he's chosen to ban-evade on a near daily basis while thumbing his nose at mods, and spam our reports and appeals systems with incoherent rants and vague personal threats. He's also been rapid-firing angry Discord PMs at me for the last couple of months. I stopped replying to him ages ago; it doesn't phase him a bit, he just keeps shouting into the void. As with his reports and ban appeals, his PMs are completely incoherent and unhinged. In fact, to this day, I still have no idea wtf he's actually angry about, because he's never bothered to clarify any of it; he just keeps ranting about how his ban was unfair, and how he's going to "expose the truth" about all of us.
And for the record I want to clarify: even with all of this, I honestly do not harbor any personal grudge against him. I just want nothing the fuck to do with him anymore, because he's made it clear that he's completely off his nut. This goes way beyond simple quirky internet autism; the guy has actual mental health problems and needs actual psychiatric help.
>>10402
>spam our reports and appeals systems with incoherent rants and vague personal threats
That might explain why the spambot/noncespambot posts stay up for a while, you guys have to sift through his bullshit.
t.bong on a swedish ip cause I want to listen to music
>spam our reports and appeals systems with incoherent rants and vague personal threats
That might explain why the spambot/noncespambot posts stay up for a while, you guys have to sift through his bullshit.
t.bong on a swedish ip cause I want to listen to music
>>10403
Actually yes, we have missed a couple of legitimate reports because they were buried under ninja-rants. I think we may have also mistakenly banned a couple of anons because we thought they were one of his proxies. So yes, at this point he is actually interfering with site operations.
Actually yes, we have missed a couple of legitimate reports because they were buried under ninja-rants. I think we may have also mistakenly banned a couple of anons because we thought they were one of his proxies. So yes, at this point he is actually interfering with site operations.
Anonymous
No.10405
>>10404
>mistakenly banned a couple of anons because we thought they were one of his proxies
Hi
t.bong that's been banned twice for laughing at the turbosperg.
>mistakenly banned a couple of anons because we thought they were one of his proxies
Hi
t.bong that's been banned twice for laughing at the turbosperg.
>>10402
https://ponerpics.org/img/view/2012/6/20/11289.png
>hi lotus
pew pew
>>10402
This is a very good summary, but I have to add that for me, it is just a little bit personal, not the least reason for which is that he tries to make it as personal possible.
I was friends with him once. Thats why I invited him onto staff back in 2019. That’s why I invited him to play games with me after he reached out last September. I was willing to overlook so many faults, and dead God did I ever get stung for it. As stated before, he caused so much drama in my game that it caused several players to quit and threatened to cause another to. It was completely sapping my will to continue, and when I opened up about it he was completely deaf to my issues, not acknowledging them at all. Not only did he rant endlessly because he didn’t get the reaction to a dice roll he wanted, he would send me DMs ranting about a dice outcome on a skill check he didn’t like six months later. I learned to mute his DMs quickly. When he rage quit, no one wanted to stop him, but he kept sperging out in the relevant channels because he has a stalkerish obsession with some other guy. He had been told dozens of times to stop spamming. I didn’t ban him at the beginning of this year precisely because he was my friend, and I was more lenient on him than I would be on a random anon. I think that because he wasn’t banned the first time, or even the second or third time, that it contributed to him thinking he’s completely above the rules and that he’s incapable of doing wrong. No, asswipe, you were banned because you promised to keep disrupting threads into perpetuity. Anyone would be banned for that.
He has threatened other users with doxxing repeatedly. He has tried to blackmail me and staff repeatedly. He has threatened to team up with the soy boys to harm the website. He has personally threatened physical violence against me at Mare Fair 3 three times through his posts and in spam reports. He has had absolutely no respect for any kind of privacy or secrets of others on more occasions than I care to elaborate upon. He just recently posted “I know you have fancy guns [he knows I’m a gun collector] but have your hands ever had to bury bodies?” This cryptic post seemed to be a death threat but was probably him raging about killing those two stray dogs he’s been repeatedly bragging about shooting for several days now.
He definitely has something wrong with his brain. I’m not sure if he was born with brain damage, he acquired it somehow, he’s on drugs, if this is schizophrenia/Bi-polar, if he’s just an asshole, or if it’s some combination of the above, but I know I’ve had enough.
>>10400
Tell me about it. It was obviously a bad idea at the time. However in fairness to everyone who went along with it, he had some kind of mental health breakdown around 2019 or 2020. He was comparatively normal until then.
>>10403
>is a bong
Damn I’m sorry man
https://ponerpics.org/img/view/2012/6/20/11289.png
>hi lotus
pew pew
>>10402
This is a very good summary, but I have to add that for me, it is just a little bit personal, not the least reason for which is that he tries to make it as personal possible.
I was friends with him once. Thats why I invited him onto staff back in 2019. That’s why I invited him to play games with me after he reached out last September. I was willing to overlook so many faults, and dead God did I ever get stung for it. As stated before, he caused so much drama in my game that it caused several players to quit and threatened to cause another to. It was completely sapping my will to continue, and when I opened up about it he was completely deaf to my issues, not acknowledging them at all. Not only did he rant endlessly because he didn’t get the reaction to a dice roll he wanted, he would send me DMs ranting about a dice outcome on a skill check he didn’t like six months later. I learned to mute his DMs quickly. When he rage quit, no one wanted to stop him, but he kept sperging out in the relevant channels because he has a stalkerish obsession with some other guy. He had been told dozens of times to stop spamming. I didn’t ban him at the beginning of this year precisely because he was my friend, and I was more lenient on him than I would be on a random anon. I think that because he wasn’t banned the first time, or even the second or third time, that it contributed to him thinking he’s completely above the rules and that he’s incapable of doing wrong. No, asswipe, you were banned because you promised to keep disrupting threads into perpetuity. Anyone would be banned for that.
He has threatened other users with doxxing repeatedly. He has tried to blackmail me and staff repeatedly. He has threatened to team up with the soy boys to harm the website. He has personally threatened physical violence against me at Mare Fair 3 three times through his posts and in spam reports. He has had absolutely no respect for any kind of privacy or secrets of others on more occasions than I care to elaborate upon. He just recently posted “I know you have fancy guns [he knows I’m a gun collector] but have your hands ever had to bury bodies?” This cryptic post seemed to be a death threat but was probably him raging about killing those two stray dogs he’s been repeatedly bragging about shooting for several days now.
He definitely has something wrong with his brain. I’m not sure if he was born with brain damage, he acquired it somehow, he’s on drugs, if this is schizophrenia/Bi-polar, if he’s just an asshole, or if it’s some combination of the above, but I know I’ve had enough.
>>10400
Tell me about it. It was obviously a bad idea at the time. However in fairness to everyone who went along with it, he had some kind of mental health breakdown around 2019 or 2020. He was comparatively normal until then.
>>10403
>is a bong
Damn I’m sorry man
>>10406
>he had some kind of mental health breakdown around 2019 or 2020. He was comparatively normal until then.
That's a bit of a coincidence to someone I'm aware of. This chap, was he techsavy?
>Damn I’m sorry man
>now bong posting
There's hills and valleys in life, being a bong is all about strife I guess.
>he had some kind of mental health breakdown around 2019 or 2020. He was comparatively normal until then.
That's a bit of a coincidence to someone I'm aware of. This chap, was he techsavy?
>Damn I’m sorry man
>now bong posting
There's hills and valleys in life, being a bong is all about strife I guess.
>>10407
No, he’s not tech savvy at all.
I’m just speculating that he had a mental health breakdown around that time because I could have sworn there was a time that he was… sort of like he is now but not constantly sperging out, and that he was definitely as he is now by late 2020.
No, he’s not tech savvy at all.
I’m just speculating that he had a mental health breakdown around that time because I could have sworn there was a time that he was… sort of like he is now but not constantly sperging out, and that he was definitely as he is now by late 2020.
Do I get to weigh in on this, or is this one of those exercises where everyone says what's on their mind and I'm just supposed to listen?
>>10410
>is this one of those exercises where everyone says what's on their mind and I'm just supposed to listen?
Yup. STFU and listen, please.
>is this one of those exercises where everyone says what's on their mind and I'm just supposed to listen?
Yup. STFU and listen, please.
Let me know when it's my turn, cuz not bring listened to has been the whole problem, aside from the proclivities of individuals who want to pretend they're unassailable
>>10412
>I get the right of redress
I don't think so. Belligerency is undesirable and reaffirm you are going the wrong way. You are being punished for naughty behavior and doubling, triple, quad, quint doubling will make your situation worse.
Remember the old saying, STOP DIGGING.
>I get the right of redress
I don't think so. Belligerency is undesirable and reaffirm you are going the wrong way. You are being punished for naughty behavior and doubling, triple, quad, quint doubling will make your situation worse.
Remember the old saying, STOP DIGGING.
>>10414
You're very silly
But the one thing I'll speak to now is killing a dog. Yes, I did. He killed my oldest of cats. An 18 year old sweetheart who let even the youngest of kitties pick on him. I'm burying 'it' in a few minutes. Thats what happens when you kill something important to me
You're very silly
But the one thing I'll speak to now is killing a dog. Yes, I did. He killed my oldest of cats. An 18 year old sweetheart who let even the youngest of kitties pick on him. I'm burying 'it' in a few minutes. Thats what happens when you kill something important to me
Anonymous
No.10416
How fast can YOU faggots dig a 4'x4'x4' hole?
I'm suffering from Ninjaz fatigue.
Huh, suddenly no one is feeling chatty
>>10402
>most of the time he chooses to be a gigantic, gaping asshole instead
If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized, shall I direct the audience to the hidden place?
>An argument with Ninjas is basically an argument with a screeching, incoherent toddler who refuses to yield any ground, no matter how ridiculous or indefensible his position may be.
It's Ninjaz, with a z, now, please and thank you.
As to the rest, yes. When I know I'm right and the people I'm arguing with are either A. wrong or B. lazy and stupid, I won't let things go. You don't get to slap me across the face a half-dozen times and are forgiven cuz that's what Jesus would want.
Not you, not anyone in particular, but you get my point.
Worse, I know how to be here forever, and yes I DO have the time and the wherewithall.
And yes, when you're being derelict at your job which only amounts to monitoring an anonymous board, I will berate you, however I have to.
>>10402
>most of the time he chooses to be a gigantic, gaping asshole instead
If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized, shall I direct the audience to the hidden place?
>An argument with Ninjas is basically an argument with a screeching, incoherent toddler who refuses to yield any ground, no matter how ridiculous or indefensible his position may be.
It's Ninjaz, with a z, now, please and thank you.
As to the rest, yes. When I know I'm right and the people I'm arguing with are either A. wrong or B. lazy and stupid, I won't let things go. You don't get to slap me across the face a half-dozen times and are forgiven cuz that's what Jesus would want.
Not you, not anyone in particular, but you get my point.
Worse, I know how to be here forever, and yes I DO have the time and the wherewithall.
And yes, when you're being derelict at your job which only amounts to monitoring an anonymous board, I will berate you, however I have to.
>>10406
I will say this. I personally have struggled with bi-polar and the covid days broke me. Ninjaz if you are reading this, please try blue lotus extract in moderation. It can help with this kind of stuff if you can't see a doctor.
I will say this. I personally have struggled with bi-polar and the covid days broke me. Ninjaz if you are reading this, please try blue lotus extract in moderation. It can help with this kind of stuff if you can't see a doctor.
Ribozyme
No.10421
>>10418
Dude sometimes you are just wrong in debates and rather than address why someone thinks you are wrong you simply accuse them of being a shill. It's lazy and it is dishonest. Someone disagreeing with you does not necessarily make them the enemy.
Dude sometimes you are just wrong in debates and rather than address why someone thinks you are wrong you simply accuse them of being a shill. It's lazy and it is dishonest. Someone disagreeing with you does not necessarily make them the enemy.
>>10419
Oh, yes, that. Okay
>cracks knuckles
Lotus and I go way back.
>I asked to have him added because he was a friend
What he means is that when I applied to staff, my position was unassailable, having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point, without recognition.
Pupper was surprised as shit to learn I was the guy. He said something to the effect of
>I wish Mlpol had someone to guarantee it's safety
.. and I was like
<Let me let you in on a little sercret
I'm not the guy anymore, obviously, and all credit to "whoever" is the guy now.
My memory is LONG, and that's your problem
>Staff rules at the time required moderation actions to be posted in the staff chat
Lies, the communication between staff was always shit.
>I'm too busy
>I can't be bothered
>What?
It's almost like you felt that monitoring the site was a privilege and not a duty.
>Make him an admin
So glad this was mentioned. You wanna know WHY? This makes Lotus mad to hear, he'll probably delete this post, but it's because Atlas almost gave the site to me.
Why, you might ask? Because I've been the heart and soul of this site from the beginning.
*flashback sounds*
>If I agree to this, you don't get to act like you own the site or anything like that
<Agreed. Ideas and information are all that are important, regardless of who is saying it
>Okay, but why?
<Because I want there to be an Mlpol. I don't care for how many it is, I want it for ME. That others can enjoy the spoils is irrelevant.
<I didn't plan this, but you sealed the deal with your post against GR15DF. "Clippity Cloppity, get off my property". I thought you'd try to negotiate
>Fuck that nigger
<And that right there, is why
*unflashbacking sounds*
>He decided one day to take a users post and edit its contents to something along the lines of
Oh you want to go there? Hehe.
The user in question was Nigel. He was being a problem at the time, one to which I volunteered to address.
Now mind you, Nigel can be a bit much
<Says you
QUIET. During one of Nigel's particularly egregious sperg-sessions I made a comment in staff discord about it.
I was advised to either edit or delete the post.
By Lotus.
I did so (edit).
It was much later that Pupper lost his shit about it.
>I had my own problems with him
This entire paragraph is revisionist history
>He was purely vitriolic in every conversation in staff chat
Only to those who were being derelict
Remember the time Lotus changed my staff password because I stopped him from abusing >That Guy?
Pepperidge Farms remembers
Oh, yes, that. Okay
>cracks knuckles
Lotus and I go way back.
>I asked to have him added because he was a friend
What he means is that when I applied to staff, my position was unassailable, having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point, without recognition.
Pupper was surprised as shit to learn I was the guy. He said something to the effect of
>I wish Mlpol had someone to guarantee it's safety
.. and I was like
<Let me let you in on a little sercret
I'm not the guy anymore, obviously, and all credit to "whoever" is the guy now.
My memory is LONG, and that's your problem
>Staff rules at the time required moderation actions to be posted in the staff chat
Lies, the communication between staff was always shit.
>I'm too busy
>I can't be bothered
>What?
It's almost like you felt that monitoring the site was a privilege and not a duty.
>Make him an admin
So glad this was mentioned. You wanna know WHY? This makes Lotus mad to hear, he'll probably delete this post, but it's because Atlas almost gave the site to me.
Why, you might ask? Because I've been the heart and soul of this site from the beginning.
*flashback sounds*
>If I agree to this, you don't get to act like you own the site or anything like that
<Agreed. Ideas and information are all that are important, regardless of who is saying it
>Okay, but why?
<Because I want there to be an Mlpol. I don't care for how many it is, I want it for ME. That others can enjoy the spoils is irrelevant.
<I didn't plan this, but you sealed the deal with your post against GR15DF. "Clippity Cloppity, get off my property". I thought you'd try to negotiate
>Fuck that nigger
<And that right there, is why
*unflashbacking sounds*
>He decided one day to take a users post and edit its contents to something along the lines of
Oh you want to go there? Hehe.
The user in question was Nigel. He was being a problem at the time, one to which I volunteered to address.
Now mind you, Nigel can be a bit much
<Says you
QUIET. During one of Nigel's particularly egregious sperg-sessions I made a comment in staff discord about it.
I was advised to either edit or delete the post.
By Lotus.
I did so (edit).
It was much later that Pupper lost his shit about it.
>I had my own problems with him
This entire paragraph is revisionist history
>He was purely vitriolic in every conversation in staff chat
Only to those who were being derelict
Remember the time Lotus changed my staff password because I stopped him from abusing >That Guy?
Pepperidge Farms remembers
>>10422
>I've been the heart and soul of this site from the beginning
Imagine being this narcissistic.
>I've been the heart and soul of this site from the beginning
Imagine being this narcissistic.
Remember when Atlas came back from getting robbed by niggers, and Lotus and I talked to him in voice chat? But then later, when notified that Atlas was 'back' Pupper refused to hear of it?
Remember how Ninjaz wrangled all of staff into a private DM and within SECONDS everyone was like "Yeah, it's authentically Atlas"? But Pupper was still so mad that he kicked him from any sort of administrative duties, and THAT'S why he left staff?
Surely you know who remembers.
Remember how Ninjaz wrangled all of staff into a private DM and within SECONDS everyone was like "Yeah, it's authentically Atlas"? But Pupper was still so mad that he kicked him from any sort of administrative duties, and THAT'S why he left staff?
Surely you know who remembers.
>>10410
>>10412
>>10413
We’ve been hearing your “””redress””” whether we want to or not through ban-evading posts, unsolicited discord messages, and false reports since early 2021. We’ve heard them. You have nothing to say. It’s always
>Disagreeing with me is gaslighting!
>this is revisionist history!
>you are lying/dishonest!
>what about that time lotus did a bad thing in 2018?
>what about that time I did a good thing back in 2017?
>I’m just going to ban evade anyways
I could go on about how this these are logical fallacies that avoid the point, but nevermind that.
Suppose it’s all true and this website has collectively perpetrated the greatest injustice in all of human history against you, worse than slavery, the six gorrillion, and all other evils combined. Why are you still here? Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you? Why don’t you go somewhere that doesn’t send you into a state of perpetual rage?
>>10418
> If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized
We don’t care “why” anymore. We’re exhausted with your perpetual rage and are ending it.
> with a z
No one cares what you want to call yourself
>>10420
I don’t mean to sound like I’m not sympathetic to those who suffer from mental health problems. I am.
I’m merely relating here that I don’t think that his behavior is from an adult who does not have some kind of mental abnormality, and that his behavior is exhausting whatever the cause.
>>10422
> Lotus and I go way back.
Correct, and this is why you’ve been given far more leniency than anyone else ever would.
> when I applied to staff, my position was unassailable
Correct. That’s why I advocated for you to be on staff, and why all of us were in such disbelief when you lost your mind.
> having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point
I’ve been personally paying for the site for four years now, Pupper paid for it for a year, and Elway paid for it for a year. Paying a few server fees doesn’t give you license to be vitriolic to everyone.
> Atlas almost gave the site to me.
Normally I’d say “bullshit, prove it” but you know what? I can almost believe it.
Atlas was and is good guy, both intelligent and likeable. But he has a sanguine personality type. He tries to avoid conflict, and he wants everyone to like him. He’s more concerned with making everyone happy that genuine solutions. And You will bully, threaten, and black mail people into doing what you want. I know you made it clear that you “must” give him admin role or else you’d leave, or what have you. But Atlas didn’t give the site to you, did he? Because he knew that would be a terrible idea. Instead, Atlas did what he usually tries to do, which is to find a solution he thought could be accepted by all parties. He actually gave the site to Pupper, because Pupper is so neutral and likeable that no one was going to say “no” to this. Then he had a spilt three-part system to attempt to simultaneously please both you and me. What should have been done was to remove you from staff as soon as you refused to communicate in the discord server.
> The user in question was Nigel.
Correct, and I mention that in my post. In fact, I mentioned that I actually was on your side in that whole argument. I’m not bringing the argument up because I think it’s so terrible that you edited a post. I’m bringing it up because your response to a policy disagreement with Pupper was to start a year long vendetta with him and declare him your arch enemy because he disagreed with something you did and wanted to place a limit on your behavior, rather than do the common sense thing and say “okay, going forward, no more edits.”
>everything is revisionist history
I have screencaps, you don’t. No I don’t care to post them, because I know no one thinks your claim is credible.
> Only to those who were being derelict
You don’t have a right to be vitriolic to everyone who disagrees with you.
>>10425
Are you seriously making a big deal of Pupper briefly being suspicious that Atlas, coming back on a completely new discord user account after an 8 month hiatus, was actually Atlas? I didn’t remember that until you brought it up. It doesn’t justify you being an ass in the present.
>>10412
>>10413
We’ve been hearing your “””redress””” whether we want to or not through ban-evading posts, unsolicited discord messages, and false reports since early 2021. We’ve heard them. You have nothing to say. It’s always
>Disagreeing with me is gaslighting!
>this is revisionist history!
>you are lying/dishonest!
>what about that time lotus did a bad thing in 2018?
>what about that time I did a good thing back in 2017?
>I’m just going to ban evade anyways
I could go on about how this these are logical fallacies that avoid the point, but nevermind that.
Suppose it’s all true and this website has collectively perpetrated the greatest injustice in all of human history against you, worse than slavery, the six gorrillion, and all other evils combined. Why are you still here? Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you? Why don’t you go somewhere that doesn’t send you into a state of perpetual rage?
>>10418
> If you want to talk about why I'm very "differently" socialized
We don’t care “why” anymore. We’re exhausted with your perpetual rage and are ending it.
> with a z
No one cares what you want to call yourself
>>10420
I don’t mean to sound like I’m not sympathetic to those who suffer from mental health problems. I am.
I’m merely relating here that I don’t think that his behavior is from an adult who does not have some kind of mental abnormality, and that his behavior is exhausting whatever the cause.
>>10422
> Lotus and I go way back.
Correct, and this is why you’ve been given far more leniency than anyone else ever would.
> when I applied to staff, my position was unassailable
Correct. That’s why I advocated for you to be on staff, and why all of us were in such disbelief when you lost your mind.
> having paid for the site for a year and a half at that point
I’ve been personally paying for the site for four years now, Pupper paid for it for a year, and Elway paid for it for a year. Paying a few server fees doesn’t give you license to be vitriolic to everyone.
> Atlas almost gave the site to me.
Normally I’d say “bullshit, prove it” but you know what? I can almost believe it.
Atlas was and is good guy, both intelligent and likeable. But he has a sanguine personality type. He tries to avoid conflict, and he wants everyone to like him. He’s more concerned with making everyone happy that genuine solutions. And You will bully, threaten, and black mail people into doing what you want. I know you made it clear that you “must” give him admin role or else you’d leave, or what have you. But Atlas didn’t give the site to you, did he? Because he knew that would be a terrible idea. Instead, Atlas did what he usually tries to do, which is to find a solution he thought could be accepted by all parties. He actually gave the site to Pupper, because Pupper is so neutral and likeable that no one was going to say “no” to this. Then he had a spilt three-part system to attempt to simultaneously please both you and me. What should have been done was to remove you from staff as soon as you refused to communicate in the discord server.
> The user in question was Nigel.
Correct, and I mention that in my post. In fact, I mentioned that I actually was on your side in that whole argument. I’m not bringing the argument up because I think it’s so terrible that you edited a post. I’m bringing it up because your response to a policy disagreement with Pupper was to start a year long vendetta with him and declare him your arch enemy because he disagreed with something you did and wanted to place a limit on your behavior, rather than do the common sense thing and say “okay, going forward, no more edits.”
>everything is revisionist history
I have screencaps, you don’t. No I don’t care to post them, because I know no one thinks your claim is credible.
> Only to those who were being derelict
You don’t have a right to be vitriolic to everyone who disagrees with you.
>>10425
Are you seriously making a big deal of Pupper briefly being suspicious that Atlas, coming back on a completely new discord user account after an 8 month hiatus, was actually Atlas? I didn’t remember that until you brought it up. It doesn’t justify you being an ass in the present.
>>10422
This site should be for all of those who want it to be a fun place. The heart and soul of mlpol is the users. Not any one particular user. And I will tell you again. Blue lotus extract can be used to treat what you have. You can find it cheap at smoke shops. You don't even need to see a doctor. And cut the blackmail crap. Blackmail is a felony.
This site should be for all of those who want it to be a fun place. The heart and soul of mlpol is the users. Not any one particular user. And I will tell you again. Blue lotus extract can be used to treat what you have. You can find it cheap at smoke shops. You don't even need to see a doctor. And cut the blackmail crap. Blackmail is a felony.
>>10415
So let’s imagine for a minute that that makes killing two dogs not a felony and completely excusable. It doesn’t, though it certainly makes it understandable.
Why, oh why, oh why for the love of God is this information so important that you need to cryptically hint about it in a report, then talk about it in the cytube at movie night, then spam it on /1ntr/, then on /sp/, then here on /qa/? Why is this so important for strangers on the internet to know that you have to ban evade to say it? I’ve had my own personal matters very recently that I would genuinely hold out to be worse than losing a pet of 18 years, and I don’t talk about it on the board or with people I don’t know very well.
Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
I’m keeping your posts bragging about killing dogs up so that way other users see them and can see what kind of person you are.
So let’s imagine for a minute that that makes killing two dogs not a felony and completely excusable. It doesn’t, though it certainly makes it understandable.
Why, oh why, oh why for the love of God is this information so important that you need to cryptically hint about it in a report, then talk about it in the cytube at movie night, then spam it on /1ntr/, then on /sp/, then here on /qa/? Why is this so important for strangers on the internet to know that you have to ban evade to say it? I’ve had my own personal matters very recently that I would genuinely hold out to be worse than losing a pet of 18 years, and I don’t talk about it on the board or with people I don’t know very well.
Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
I’m keeping your posts bragging about killing dogs up so that way other users see them and can see what kind of person you are.
>>10428
Blackmail and doxxing threats.
It's really annoying to know that all the time I wasted trying to get to know this guy and keep a relationship going with him culminated in him leveraging it to harass and threaten my friends over petty squabbles. He's an untrustworthy loser, and he continues to spam and posture because he can't accept that he might be wrong for once.
>>10427
>Why are you still here? Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you? Why don’t you go somewhere that doesn’t send you into a state of perpetual rage?
Probably a combination of sunk cost fallacy, spite, autistic fixation, schizophrenic delusion, and psychotic obsession.
It's actually pathetic.
>>10429
>Why, oh why, oh why for the love of God is this information so important that you need to cryptically hint about it in a report, then talk about it in the cytube at movie night, then spam it on /1ntr/, then on /sp/, then here on /qa/? Why is this so important for strangers on the internet to know that you have to ban evade to say it? I’ve had my own personal matters very recently that I would genuinely hold out to be worse than losing a pet of 18 years, and I don’t talk about it on the board or with people I don’t know very well.
Probably because he's emotionally unstable, but still wants to brag about it so that he can come off as edgy or "hardboiled", when in reality it just makes him too lame and psychotic.
It's not the first time he's done this, but the first time it involved a dog in my recollection.
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
Yeah, he had a pattern of sending vague threats to me on discord until I eventually blocked him, and then he proceeded to try to do the same thing on site. It must be really annoying for him to send you that bullshit by abusing the reporting system.
Blackmail and doxxing threats.
It's really annoying to know that all the time I wasted trying to get to know this guy and keep a relationship going with him culminated in him leveraging it to harass and threaten my friends over petty squabbles. He's an untrustworthy loser, and he continues to spam and posture because he can't accept that he might be wrong for once.
>>10427
>Why are you still here? Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you? Why don’t you go somewhere that doesn’t send you into a state of perpetual rage?
Probably a combination of sunk cost fallacy, spite, autistic fixation, schizophrenic delusion, and psychotic obsession.
It's actually pathetic.
>>10429
>Why, oh why, oh why for the love of God is this information so important that you need to cryptically hint about it in a report, then talk about it in the cytube at movie night, then spam it on /1ntr/, then on /sp/, then here on /qa/? Why is this so important for strangers on the internet to know that you have to ban evade to say it? I’ve had my own personal matters very recently that I would genuinely hold out to be worse than losing a pet of 18 years, and I don’t talk about it on the board or with people I don’t know very well.
Probably because he's emotionally unstable, but still wants to brag about it so that he can come off as edgy or "hardboiled", when in reality it just makes him too lame and psychotic.
It's not the first time he's done this, but the first time it involved a dog in my recollection.
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
Yeah, he had a pattern of sending vague threats to me on discord until I eventually blocked him, and then he proceeded to try to do the same thing on site. It must be really annoying for him to send you that bullshit by abusing the reporting system.
>>10429
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about?
Tbh, you might want to consider getting law enforcement involved there. A threat is still a threat, even if its said in a vague and cryptic way. Screenshot everything and archive it so that he can be prosecuted.
Iirc, he's already a felon, so the justice system won't treat him well if you have evidence of death threats.
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about?
Tbh, you might want to consider getting law enforcement involved there. A threat is still a threat, even if its said in a vague and cryptic way. Screenshot everything and archive it so that he can be prosecuted.
Iirc, he's already a felon, so the justice system won't treat him well if you have evidence of death threats.
Back to the original topic though. /vint/ /x/ and /ko/ sound good to everyone?
>>10435
I would prefer /kx/, /vint/, and maybe roleplay (/qst/, /tg/, "horseplay" /hp/). Roleplay is a topic large enough to have its own board, and most other pony altchans have one.
I don't really have very much to contribute on the topic of cars ,and I might still be salty over /pol/-tan taking /o/-tan to the ball instead of /mlp/.
I would prefer /kx/, /vint/, and maybe roleplay (/qst/, /tg/, "horseplay" /hp/). Roleplay is a topic large enough to have its own board, and most other pony altchans have one.
I don't really have very much to contribute on the topic of cars ,and I might still be salty over /pol/-tan taking /o/-tan to the ball instead of /mlp/.
I do want to stress that /vx/ should be renovated as soon as possible. The state of the board is poor, and it sabotages this site's potential to acquire new users from 4chan who are being bullied by jannies who don't want them to talk about collective shout. This site could be a hub for gamergate 3 if cards are played right, so it's important to have a proper board for video games.
Idk if we should even have /vint/, because the small size of this community means that posters with non-American flags are often easily identifiable and intimidated into silence. The non-political boards shouldn't have flags.
Idk if we should even have /vint/, because the small size of this community means that posters with non-American flags are often easily identifiable and intimidated into silence. The non-political boards shouldn't have flags.
>>10436
I can contribute to cars and I will say it again. Schizophrenia and guns shouldn't be mixed. Imagine if people like ninjaz were using that board.
I can contribute to cars and I will say it again. Schizophrenia and guns shouldn't be mixed. Imagine if people like ninjaz were using that board.
The site should be trying not only to appease old users, but to draw new users in.
>>10438
>Imagine if people like ninjaz were using that board.
Not having a board wouldn't make them go away.
I just find the concept entertaining. Still better than /vx/.
Roleplayers and occultists really don't mix at all. Roleplayers don't want to be mistaken for occultists 1980s Satanic Panic style, and occultists don't want to be mixed up unserious larpers. And meanwhile /v/ gets suffocated under both of those topics.
>>10439
>>10440
Exactly. We should accommodate that. If we do it well, we could be s popular altchan, and having an appropriate video games board is pivotal for that.
Tbh, /v/ could be a standalone board.
>Imagine if people like ninjaz were using that board.
Not having a board wouldn't make them go away.
I just find the concept entertaining. Still better than /vx/.
Roleplayers and occultists really don't mix at all. Roleplayers don't want to be mistaken for occultists 1980s Satanic Panic style, and occultists don't want to be mixed up unserious larpers. And meanwhile /v/ gets suffocated under both of those topics.
>>10439
>>10440
Exactly. We should accommodate that. If we do it well, we could be s popular altchan, and having an appropriate video games board is pivotal for that.
Tbh, /v/ could be a standalone board.
>>10441
>Not having a board wouldn't make them go away.
I just find the concept entertaining. Still better than /vx/.
Anything would be better than /vx/ at this point, but as was stated earlier this site could host something similar to gamer gate 3.0 if the cards are played right /vint/ would be perfect for that. I think /x/ should be stand alone with religious discussions also allowed. And I think we should avoid having the weapons board directly part of the schizo talk board. I think /ko/ would make a great board because a lot of the same masculine mechanical type minds would be both attracted to both guns and cars.
>Not having a board wouldn't make them go away.
I just find the concept entertaining. Still better than /vx/.
Anything would be better than /vx/ at this point, but as was stated earlier this site could host something similar to gamer gate 3.0 if the cards are played right /vint/ would be perfect for that. I think /x/ should be stand alone with religious discussions also allowed. And I think we should avoid having the weapons board directly part of the schizo talk board. I think /ko/ would make a great board because a lot of the same masculine mechanical type minds would be both attracted to both guns and cars.
>>10442
>as was stated earlier this site could host something similar to gamer gate 3.0 if the cards are played right /vint/ would be perfect for that
I was a proponent for /vint/ when I made this thread, but now I don't think so, just because the presence of flags has demonstrated to intimidate non-American posters.
>as was stated earlier this site could host something similar to gamer gate 3.0 if the cards are played right /vint/ would be perfect for that
I was a proponent for /vint/ when I made this thread, but now I don't think so, just because the presence of flags has demonstrated to intimidate non-American posters.
>We've been hearing your redress
Lol no, NO ONE has heard it because it's fucking tedious and lengthy! And that's because Lotus has avoided accountability (technically) since HE was kicked from staff!
>Why are you still here
"Why" is irrelevant.
>Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you
Surely you've noticed that the satisfaction of staff isn't a concern. It was, once
>are you making a big deal about Pupper being suspicious
That's not what Pupper said, he SAID "I don't give a fuck if it IS Atlas"
>So let’s imagine for a minute that that makes killing two dogs not a felony and completely excusable
You clearly don't live in Texas, livestock has more rights than humans
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
This is exactly the nancy-ass behavior I'm talking about. No it's not a fucking threat you mongoloid.
>bragging
Do you think I'm happy about the scenario? Hold on, do you think... yeah you probably do, nevermind.
>>10430
>Blackmail and doxxing threats
What blackmail? And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
>It's actually pathetic
Would it be less if I was ERPing with a dude?
Lol no, NO ONE has heard it because it's fucking tedious and lengthy! And that's because Lotus has avoided accountability (technically) since HE was kicked from staff!
>Why are you still here
"Why" is irrelevant.
>Why are you posting to a website where the staff and users hate you
Surely you've noticed that the satisfaction of staff isn't a concern. It was, once
>are you making a big deal about Pupper being suspicious
That's not what Pupper said, he SAID "I don't give a fuck if it IS Atlas"
>So let’s imagine for a minute that that makes killing two dogs not a felony and completely excusable
You clearly don't live in Texas, livestock has more rights than humans
>Is that last line supposed to be a death threat of some kind? Are you implying that you’ll shoot and kill me at the Rosen Center if I don’t unban you from mlpol? You’ve already sent reports and messages saying that you’ll choke me, or implying that you’ll physically attack me at Mare Fair. Is that what this is about? Stay the fuck away from me, and stay the hell off of this board.
This is exactly the nancy-ass behavior I'm talking about. No it's not a fucking threat you mongoloid.
>bragging
Do you think I'm happy about the scenario? Hold on, do you think... yeah you probably do, nevermind.
>>10430
>Blackmail and doxxing threats
What blackmail? And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
>It's actually pathetic
Would it be less if I was ERPing with a dude?
Anonymous
No.10446
Apparently this needs to be said:
I'm not hostile to anyone nor will engage in hostility toward any person, individuals, etc.
I have alot of practice at fighting and grappling, and since I'm not working I have been getting back into the swing of things, so yes I could choke (you) or whoever out, before you were able to draw a firearm since you're making Marefair about that for some reason.
I WON'T, that's what on the internet we call "Conjecture" (sometimes known as shitposting), so calm your tits.
I'm not hostile to anyone nor will engage in hostility toward any person, individuals, etc.
I have alot of practice at fighting and grappling, and since I'm not working I have been getting back into the swing of things, so yes I could choke (you) or whoever out, before you were able to draw a firearm since you're making Marefair about that for some reason.
I WON'T, that's what on the internet we call "Conjecture" (sometimes known as shitposting), so calm your tits.
>>10444
>And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
That is still blackmail dude. You need to cut the shit.
>And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
That is still blackmail dude. You need to cut the shit.
>>10447
Need is a strong word, for one. For two, I'm not the one who can't follow through with an agreement
Need is a strong word, for one. For two, I'm not the one who can't follow through with an agreement
Ribozyme
No.10449
>>10448
Yes need. That behavior is going to get you arrested. A judge will see it and you're already in the system. What do you think a jury will say? I'm going to say this again. Go look into blue lotus extract to calm your ass down.
Yes need. That behavior is going to get you arrested. A judge will see it and you're already in the system. What do you think a jury will say? I'm going to say this again. Go look into blue lotus extract to calm your ass down.
>>10450
Blackmail is a federal crime you can do serious time for that. "Making someone think there is a credible threat" is a credible threat. It's a felony so cut the shit.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/873
Blackmail is a federal crime you can do serious time for that. "Making someone think there is a credible threat" is a credible threat. It's a felony so cut the shit.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/873
Anonymous
No.10452
Anonymous
No.10453
>>10444
>"Why" is irrelevant.
Enlighten us then.
>Surely you've noticed that the satisfaction of staff isn't a concern. It was, once
Your actions don't just affect the staff, but also the other users. Everyone is tired of your spam.
>No it's not a fucking threat
It sounds like a threat at face value. Learn to communicate.
>And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
First of all, that's a lie and you know it.
Second of all, a threat is a threat.
Holding up an old alarm clock and saying it's a bomb is still a bomb threat, regardless of if you actually had a bomb. Same goes for any other kind of threat.
You threaten people, and now you are scorned. Nobody trusts you anymore. Nobody wants to interact with you because you have demonstrated that you are not fit for civilized society.
>I'm not hostile to anyone nor will engage in hostility toward any person, individuals, etc.
Spamming, harassment, and threats are all hostile behavior. Your actions speak louder than words.
>since I'm not working
Get a job, nigger.
>so yes I could choke (you) or whoever out, before you were able to draw a firearm since you're making Marefair about that for some reason.
You say that, and then you wonder why you are not welcome here.
>I WON'T, that's what on the internet we call "Conjecture" (sometimes known as shitposting), so calm your tits.
That kind of faggot logic doesn't hold up in court, and it won't hold up here.
>>10447
This.
>>10450
Possibly, yes. I hope they throw the book at you.
>>10451
Not to mention the choking thing, which is also a federal crime.
Plus it fits the definition of criminal harassment under Texas Penal Code § 42.07, so that's a state charge.
He really should be reported to the police for this bullshit. I've had enough of this faggot.
>"Why" is irrelevant.
Enlighten us then.
>Surely you've noticed that the satisfaction of staff isn't a concern. It was, once
Your actions don't just affect the staff, but also the other users. Everyone is tired of your spam.
>No it's not a fucking threat
It sounds like a threat at face value. Learn to communicate.
>And the doxxing threats we've been over, there was never a legitimate threat, I just made you think there was one.
First of all, that's a lie and you know it.
Second of all, a threat is a threat.
Holding up an old alarm clock and saying it's a bomb is still a bomb threat, regardless of if you actually had a bomb. Same goes for any other kind of threat.
You threaten people, and now you are scorned. Nobody trusts you anymore. Nobody wants to interact with you because you have demonstrated that you are not fit for civilized society.
>I'm not hostile to anyone nor will engage in hostility toward any person, individuals, etc.
Spamming, harassment, and threats are all hostile behavior. Your actions speak louder than words.
>since I'm not working
Get a job, nigger.
>so yes I could choke (you) or whoever out, before you were able to draw a firearm since you're making Marefair about that for some reason.
You say that, and then you wonder why you are not welcome here.
>I WON'T, that's what on the internet we call "Conjecture" (sometimes known as shitposting), so calm your tits.
That kind of faggot logic doesn't hold up in court, and it won't hold up here.
>>10447
This.
>>10450
Possibly, yes. I hope they throw the book at you.
>>10451
Not to mention the choking thing, which is also a federal crime.
Plus it fits the definition of criminal harassment under Texas Penal Code § 42.07, so that's a state charge.
He really should be reported to the police for this bullshit. I've had enough of this faggot.
Mods, please screencap and archive these posts as evidence before you delete them. I can't because I'm on mobile.
Anonymous
No.10455
1754848467.jpg (180.3 KB, 1080x426, Screenshot_20250810_125355_Brave.jpg)
>Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Oh right, cuz you're gonna drag my ass to court because I rustled your jimmies on the internet. Do your worst, and make sure to point to where on the doll I hurt your feelings.
Oh right, cuz you're gonna drag my ass to court because I rustled your jimmies on the internet. Do your worst, and make sure to point to where on the doll I hurt your feelings.
>>10456
People are talking about dragging you to court because you are trying to blackmail and extort your way into a moderation position.
People are talking about dragging you to court because you are trying to blackmail and extort your way into a moderation position.
Anonymous
No.10458
>>10457
Even if he weren't trying to be a mod, his pattern of illegal threats and harassment cannot be allowed to continue. I would even testify against him.
Even if he weren't trying to be a mod, his pattern of illegal threats and harassment cannot be allowed to continue. I would even testify against him.
>>10457
This is just insane. Like, if you have any illusions about me wanting to be on staff, let me disabuse you of them now. I HAVE made jokes about how staff is incompetent and actually be alot more effective if I was back on, but no there's neither aspiration nor incentive.
Either I shitpost too hard, or some of y'all are really not good at this
This is just insane. Like, if you have any illusions about me wanting to be on staff, let me disabuse you of them now. I HAVE made jokes about how staff is incompetent and actually be alot more effective if I was back on, but no there's neither aspiration nor incentive.
Either I shitpost too hard, or some of y'all are really not good at this
To the ban evading nigass - you’re still perma-banned, your few posts have only been suffered to exist because I wanted users who don’t already know you to understand what an unsufferable cunt you are, and also for the 1 in one billion chance that maybe, just maybe, something could get through to you.
>>10456
Cruelty to non-livestock animals, as well as Deadly-Conduct - discharge of firearm, are both State Jail Felonies in (You)r jurisdiction. Felon in Possession of firearm is probably legal under the circumstances, but trying to take firearms to Mare Fair is felonious under Texas, Florida, and Federal law, and I promise you I will see to it that that one is enforced.
Threats of violence are a Class B misdemeanor. Don’t worry, I’m working on it.
>>10454
It saves in the system, don’t worry.
>>10456
Cruelty to non-livestock animals, as well as Deadly-Conduct - discharge of firearm, are both State Jail Felonies in (You)r jurisdiction. Felon in Possession of firearm is probably legal under the circumstances, but trying to take firearms to Mare Fair is felonious under Texas, Florida, and Federal law, and I promise you I will see to it that that one is enforced.
Threats of violence are a Class B misdemeanor. Don’t worry, I’m working on it.
>>10454
It saves in the system, don’t worry.
i am just imagining that in a court , trying to explaining it to the judge that how in a Pony Nazi site someone was blackmailing people...
are you guys talking about real court right?
are you guys talking about real court right?
>>10466
yeah i read what lotus wrote , ningas sound like a very horrible person
i agree with the suing him
yeah i read what lotus wrote , ningas sound like a very horrible person
i agree with the suing him
>>10459
Kill yourself, you degenerate criminal.
>>10461
>It saves in the system, don’t worry.
Huh, really? Are all deleted posts archived?
That makes me a bit uncomfortable, for other reasons...
>>10462
What else should we do if he goes around threatening people? Criminal content is not allowed.
>>10466
This.
Banning him apparently wasn't enough.
Kill yourself, you degenerate criminal.
>>10461
>It saves in the system, don’t worry.
Huh, really? Are all deleted posts archived?
That makes me a bit uncomfortable, for other reasons...
>>10462
What else should we do if he goes around threatening people? Criminal content is not allowed.
>>10466
This.
Banning him apparently wasn't enough.
>>10468
>What else should we do if he goes around threatening people? Criminal content is not allowed.
well i hope being a nazi is not illegal in america
because that would have a negative effect on judge's judgement tho
but if you guys have strong evidence against him , then definitely sue his ass
>What else should we do if he goes around threatening people? Criminal content is not allowed.
well i hope being a nazi is not illegal in america
because that would have a negative effect on judge's judgement tho
but if you guys have strong evidence against him , then definitely sue his ass
>>10469
Sueing could be a good idea. A civil case would hold him accountable and would force him to cut the shit.
Sueing could be a good idea. A civil case would hold him accountable and would force him to cut the shit.
Anonymous
No.10471
>>10469
>i hope being a nazi is not illegal in america
It is not.
>strong evidence against him
I have a background in forensics. If he's going to play this game, I won't hold back.
>i hope being a nazi is not illegal in america
It is not.
>strong evidence against him
I have a background in forensics. If he's going to play this game, I won't hold back.
also wtf was about that dog killing and animal abuse?
i hope that was just bluffing
i hope that was just bluffing
>>10473
>Probably thinks it makes him sound tough.
yeah . no , it doesn't like at all , it just make him sound like an edgy teenager with parental issues who talks about satanism and sends gore videos in discord
>Probably thinks it makes him sound tough.
yeah . no , it doesn't like at all , it just make him sound like an edgy teenager with parental issues who talks about satanism and sends gore videos in discord
>>10474
I am convinced that his brain completely stopped growing at 13. His mental state comes off as stunted and immature despite his age. He's touched in the head.
I am convinced that his brain completely stopped growing at 13. His mental state comes off as stunted and immature despite his age. He's touched in the head.
>>10475
>I am convinced that his brain completely stopped growing at 13. His mental state comes off as stunted and immature despite his age
eh being on 4chan for a long time , seeing someone like him is not rare
anyway i will not interrupt this thread no more
>I am convinced that his brain completely stopped growing at 13. His mental state comes off as stunted and immature despite his age
eh being on 4chan for a long time , seeing someone like him is not rare
anyway i will not interrupt this thread no more
Anonymous
No.10477
>>10476
>anyway i will not interrupt this thread no more
It's already derailed at this point. I might make another one later.
>anyway i will not interrupt this thread no more
It's already derailed at this point. I might make another one later.
>>10468
>That makes me a bit uncomfortable, for other reasons...
Deleted images are not saved, and we did fix that
>>10472
It was not. Two stray dogs killed his 18-year-old cat, so he shot and killed both dogs with firearms nominally in his roommate's name and then buried them in his yard. He has gone way out of his way to make sure everyone here knows this story.
>>10466
>>10467
>>10470
My day job is in the criminal justice system, so I will ask around about what options are possible.
>>10478
It's a State Jail Felony. Two Counts.
>That makes me a bit uncomfortable, for other reasons...
Deleted images are not saved, and we did fix that
>>10472
It was not. Two stray dogs killed his 18-year-old cat, so he shot and killed both dogs with firearms nominally in his roommate's name and then buried them in his yard. He has gone way out of his way to make sure everyone here knows this story.
>>10466
>>10467
>>10470
My day job is in the criminal justice system, so I will ask around about what options are possible.
>>10478
It's a State Jail Felony. Two Counts.
>>10481
what a comeback
this is getting really childish
--
why are you guys randomly banned me for?
what a comeback
this is getting really childish
--
why are you guys randomly banned me for?
>>10478
>No, that was legitimate
Nobody cares about your unsolicited dog-killing stories. You have no reason to share that at all, let alone spam it repeatedly across boards. Your performative edginess is pathetic.
>>10479
>Deleted images are not saved, and we did fix that
That's better, although the text of certain posts sometimes contains personal data that is better off deleted. That's a topic for another thread though.
>He has gone way out of his way to make sure everyone here knows this story.
See, this is the stupid part. Why would he flaunt something like that? Why share it at all?
I've dealt with animals all my life, but putting an animal down is not something I ever felt the need to broadcast across platforms. This faggot is an attention-seeking edgelord.
>so I will ask around about what options are possible.
Thankyou. I know that doing this is very stressful and tiresome, so I want you to know I appreciate that you are taking this matter seriously.
>>10483
Looks like you got caught in the crossfire. Yet another way this ban-evading faggot's behavior has been a detriment to the site.
>No, that was legitimate
Nobody cares about your unsolicited dog-killing stories. You have no reason to share that at all, let alone spam it repeatedly across boards. Your performative edginess is pathetic.
>>10479
>Deleted images are not saved, and we did fix that
That's better, although the text of certain posts sometimes contains personal data that is better off deleted. That's a topic for another thread though.
>He has gone way out of his way to make sure everyone here knows this story.
See, this is the stupid part. Why would he flaunt something like that? Why share it at all?
I've dealt with animals all my life, but putting an animal down is not something I ever felt the need to broadcast across platforms. This faggot is an attention-seeking edgelord.
>so I will ask around about what options are possible.
Thankyou. I know that doing this is very stressful and tiresome, so I want you to know I appreciate that you are taking this matter seriously.
>>10483
Looks like you got caught in the crossfire. Yet another way this ban-evading faggot's behavior has been a detriment to the site.
Anonymous
No.10485
>>10484
>Looks like you got caught in the crossfire. Yet another way this ban-evading faggot's behavior has been a detriment to the site.
eh no heart feeling
i just wait for my appeal
>Looks like you got caught in the crossfire. Yet another way this ban-evading faggot's behavior has been a detriment to the site.
eh no heart feeling
i just wait for my appeal
What a garbage person. Pathetic, petty, obsessive, unemployed, untrustworthy, spiteful, and most of all annoying. One of the biggest degenerates I've had the misfortune of knowing.
Anonymous
No.10490
>>10478
I can confirm he cares for animals.
I can confirm he cares for animals.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-200] [201-339] [Next] [Live (last 200 replies)]
339 replies | 55 files | 118 UUIDs | Page 2