>>10075For a minority or leftist. That would be the case
>>10074That's a perfectly normal response and most people don't.
There's two points of view. The first is role play in any form. It's not real so there's space to see what that kind of idea is like. Forced submission or enforcing dominance sort of thing. Or other explorations.
The second is does it meet one of the checklists. Does my autonomic systems or conscious systems respond to this?
For simple example, is there female sexual organ in the scene? If yes, get hard. Doesn't matter the other stuff, just that is checked.
Most people have both a blacklist and whitelist and a neutral list.
Like say a no hooves could fall under any of the above for a hypothetical person.
Let's say it's a blacklist sort of thing. Which would degrade the sensual scene if it were there.
Keep in mind these lists are weighted and can be multiplied in context of other factors.
Let's say a pony, who happens to be the favorite, who is doing a nice pose of sort. Just one of those could technically do it for somebody, but it's far more likely that all together the cumulative effect or at least a portion will be pleasing.
Many people won't or are disinclined to do hypothetical senarios for a multitude of reasons.
Tragedy and comedy can vastly differ depending onto whom it's done even if the action is the same.
How it's done also matters.
Now we get to the weeds, does it all together be neutral or positive with those calculations.
For the exacting taste likely not.
Rape usually leaves a bad taste in ones mouth.
For those that have the minimum be, as long as it's vaguely attractive even in the abstract that's fine enough to get the blood flowing.
Now I will say there are caveats and alternative reasons that may or may not effect the thought process.
I'm also not talking about desensitization that's it's own yet related topic.
Then again violence is a question. The answer for that is more. Unless it's funny in which case do the other thing.
Ah also depends on sympathy.