Iran news, Dante's hell edition.
continuation on previous thread
>>>/mlpol/397205 →
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
250 replies and 76 files omitted.
/)
>>407015
did u know there are few polish descendants in north of iran?
during persecutions of polish people by russians they shipped some of them here.
the local people there quickly dressed the prisoners who were there, especially the children and women, in local clothes and adopted them.
That's why you see people with beautiful colored eyes in the north.
did u know there are few polish descendants in north of iran?
during persecutions of polish people by russians they shipped some of them here.
the local people there quickly dressed the prisoners who were there, especially the children and women, in local clothes and adopted them.
That's why you see people with beautiful colored eyes in the north.
Well, it's like America has set a timer for the beginning of a naval blockade.
And an attack on one of Iran's nuclear facilities called "Klang??" in the mountains near Isfahan.
4 hours left
The parliament of the Islamic Empire of Japan reopened today and its representatives are talking about revenge and death for America and that there should be no compromise and that the atomic bomb should be built, etc.
And an attack on one of Iran's nuclear facilities called "Klang??" in the mountains near Isfahan.
4 hours left
The parliament of the Islamic Empire of Japan reopened today and its representatives are talking about revenge and death for America and that there should be no compromise and that the atomic bomb should be built, etc.
Day 136 of the war
The United States targeted Iranian national army bases for the first time, which is unprecedented for both Israel and the United States.
During this attack by the American terrorist army, 7 of the 388th Iranshahr Brigade's support and duty personnel were martyred, and a number of personnel were injured and are undergoing treatment.
After global opposition, Trump withdrew from collecting 20% Strait of Hormuz tolls
Trump: Next week will be the turn of bridges; we will disable all Iranian power plants
Missiles and weapons do not work with electrical outlets
The possibility of war between Iran and Arab countries and a ground war continues to increase
America's barbaric and animal behavior only leads the war to a worse outcome.
sources: are iranian national tv and iran international
The United States targeted Iranian national army bases for the first time, which is unprecedented for both Israel and the United States.
During this attack by the American terrorist army, 7 of the 388th Iranshahr Brigade's support and duty personnel were martyred, and a number of personnel were injured and are undergoing treatment.
After global opposition, Trump withdrew from collecting 20% Strait of Hormuz tolls
Trump: Next week will be the turn of bridges; we will disable all Iranian power plants
Missiles and weapons do not work with electrical outlets
The possibility of war between Iran and Arab countries and a ground war continues to increase
America's barbaric and animal behavior only leads the war to a worse outcome.
sources: are iranian national tv and iran international
>>407058
>The possibility of war between Iran and Arab countries and a ground war continues to increase
Nah, the neighboring arabs have no hardware neither soldiers to stage any credible threat to the almighty Persian Army.
Also the possibility of a ground assault is far far far remote because of the difficulties.
Let us see.
1) Landing on that big island by the straight is likely by air-lifting means. The problem is resupply and support are very limited or impossible to deploy as any ship approaching the shore would be sunk and the marines would be under constant drone and missile attack resulting in a tactical catastrophe for America.
2) Ground assault from Azerbaijan: It is doomed to fail, the country is small and offers little room to assemble the million soldier army needed, also that small surface means that Americans would be under constant attack by drones.
3) Ground attack from Turkey: highly unlikely. Erdogan is a rat but not stupid. He doesn't want to ruin his chances of resurging on top and be regional power when the dust up ends. Iran is a very dangerous enemy able to inflict massive damage to Turkey.
4) Ground attack from Irak: It might work in theory because of the country's size, but, flat desserts offer no refuge to an army and the exposure to Iranian attacks in the geography is a really big problem.
-----
On the American domestic side. Calling to arms 1 or 2 million of sons and daughters of racial aliens now with American citizenship might not be a bad idea. Culling the unwanted herd might be the way to go.
>The possibility of war between Iran and Arab countries and a ground war continues to increase
Nah, the neighboring arabs have no hardware neither soldiers to stage any credible threat to the almighty Persian Army.
Also the possibility of a ground assault is far far far remote because of the difficulties.
Let us see.
1) Landing on that big island by the straight is likely by air-lifting means. The problem is resupply and support are very limited or impossible to deploy as any ship approaching the shore would be sunk and the marines would be under constant drone and missile attack resulting in a tactical catastrophe for America.
2) Ground assault from Azerbaijan: It is doomed to fail, the country is small and offers little room to assemble the million soldier army needed, also that small surface means that Americans would be under constant attack by drones.
3) Ground attack from Turkey: highly unlikely. Erdogan is a rat but not stupid. He doesn't want to ruin his chances of resurging on top and be regional power when the dust up ends. Iran is a very dangerous enemy able to inflict massive damage to Turkey.
4) Ground attack from Irak: It might work in theory because of the country's size, but, flat desserts offer no refuge to an army and the exposure to Iranian attacks in the geography is a really big problem.
-----
On the American domestic side. Calling to arms 1 or 2 million of sons and daughters of racial aliens now with American citizenship might not be a bad idea. Culling the unwanted herd might be the way to go.
>>407081
<3
----------
There is this war mongering about a full ground attack
So i have to explain this for every lil timmy out there why is this a completely retarded idea.
Iran's size. Iran covers about 1.65 million km² (636,000 sq mi), making it roughly four times larger than Iraq. Controlling such a large territory would require enormous manpower and resources.
Mountainous terrain. Much of western and northern Iran is dominated by the Zagros and Alborz mountain ranges. Mountains favor defenders by restricting movement, creating natural choke points, and making supply lines harder to protect.
Large population. With around 90 million people, Iran is much more populous than Iraq was in 2003. Even if major cities were captured, occupying and governing the country would likely be a prolonged challenge.
Strong defensive preparations. Iran has spent decades preparing for the possibility of foreign attack. Its military doctrine emphasizes asymmetric warfare, dispersed missile forces, underground facilities, drones, and decentralized command structures that are difficult to eliminate quickly.
Logistics. Any invading force would have to maintain long supply lines for fuel, ammunition, food, spare parts, and medical support. Those supply lines would themselves become targets. Historically, logistics often determine whether a campaign succeeds.
Risk of prolonged insurgency. Even if conventional battles were won, an occupation could face years of guerrilla warfare. Experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan have led many analysts to conclude that defeating an organized military does not necessarily translate into achieving political objectives.
Regional escalation. A ground invasion could broaden the conflict by involving attacks on military bases, shipping, or regional partners, increasing economic and geopolitical costs.
Economic consequences. Fighting near the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz could disrupt a major global energy transit route, potentially affecting oil prices and international trade.
<3
----------
There is this war mongering about a full ground attack
So i have to explain this for every lil timmy out there why is this a completely retarded idea.
Iran's size. Iran covers about 1.65 million km² (636,000 sq mi), making it roughly four times larger than Iraq. Controlling such a large territory would require enormous manpower and resources.
Mountainous terrain. Much of western and northern Iran is dominated by the Zagros and Alborz mountain ranges. Mountains favor defenders by restricting movement, creating natural choke points, and making supply lines harder to protect.
Large population. With around 90 million people, Iran is much more populous than Iraq was in 2003. Even if major cities were captured, occupying and governing the country would likely be a prolonged challenge.
Strong defensive preparations. Iran has spent decades preparing for the possibility of foreign attack. Its military doctrine emphasizes asymmetric warfare, dispersed missile forces, underground facilities, drones, and decentralized command structures that are difficult to eliminate quickly.
Logistics. Any invading force would have to maintain long supply lines for fuel, ammunition, food, spare parts, and medical support. Those supply lines would themselves become targets. Historically, logistics often determine whether a campaign succeeds.
Risk of prolonged insurgency. Even if conventional battles were won, an occupation could face years of guerrilla warfare. Experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan have led many analysts to conclude that defeating an organized military does not necessarily translate into achieving political objectives.
Regional escalation. A ground invasion could broaden the conflict by involving attacks on military bases, shipping, or regional partners, increasing economic and geopolitical costs.
Economic consequences. Fighting near the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz could disrupt a major global energy transit route, potentially affecting oil prices and international trade.
>>407081
> almighty Persian Army
I a bit...c.rin/ge at that but
Also don't forget this is a war on islamic lunatics.
Battlefield 3 may portray the war with Iran as very based and amazingly action packed, but the truth is:
We are dealing with people who have no sense of humanity.
Those who consider death to be martyrdom in the way of God.
Those who strapped bombs to children in the Iraq war to destroy enemy tanks.
Those who, in no way, do I think show an ounce of mercy towards the enemy, and I don't think they would release a prisoner without torture or rape.
Those who show no mercy to their own people.
And Iran can employ up to two million people, so no matter how much American troops it deploys, it will still fall short. I believe the US can deploy a maximum of 300,000 troops.
> almighty Persian Army
I a bit...c.rin/ge at that but
Also don't forget this is a war on islamic lunatics.
Battlefield 3 may portray the war with Iran as very based and amazingly action packed, but the truth is:
We are dealing with people who have no sense of humanity.
Those who consider death to be martyrdom in the way of God.
Those who strapped bombs to children in the Iraq war to destroy enemy tanks.
Those who, in no way, do I think show an ounce of mercy towards the enemy, and I don't think they would release a prisoner without torture or rape.
Those who show no mercy to their own people.
And Iran can employ up to two million people, so no matter how much American troops it deploys, it will still fall short. I believe the US can deploy a maximum of 300,000 troops.
And also why US attacking iran's energy sites and Infrastructure a bad idea?
other than it is a war crime which i don't think america has a problem to commit one.
If we are being realistic, the Iranian government loves to see its people miserable. First of all, the lack of electricity and water does not target the regime in any way and has no effect whatsoever on Iran's missile launches. It only makes the people more dependent on the government and the control of thoughts becomes stronger.
--
Global energy prices could spike. Iran is a major oil producer and sits on the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant share of the world's seaborne oil and LNG passes. Damage to Iranian energy infrastructure or retaliation affecting Gulf shipping could reduce supplies and increase oil and gas prices worldwide, affecting inflation and economic growth.
It could trigger broader retaliation. Iran has repeatedly indicated it would respond asymmetrically. Retaliation could include missile or drone attacks on oil facilities in neighboring Gulf states, attacks on shipping, cyberattacks, or strikes on U.S. bases and partners in the region, potentially widening the conflict.
Civilian consequences could be severe. Energy infrastructure often supports essential civilian services. Electricity powers hospitals, water treatment plants, communications, and food distribution. Long-term outages can create humanitarian crises even if military facilities are not directly targeted. International humanitarian law requires distinction and proportionality in attacks, and civilian infrastructure receives significant legal protection unless it has become a lawful military objective.
The political objective may not be achieved. Damaging infrastructure can impose economic costs, but history shows that states under external attack do not necessarily change core national security policies. Instead, attacks can strengthen domestic support for a government's resistance or encourage further escalation. This is a recurring observation in studies of coercive air campaigns.
Long-term regional instability. Even if military operations succeeded tactically, rebuilding energy infrastructure can take years. Extended disruptions could affect neighboring economies, investment, and regional energy markets long after fighting ends.
Cyber escalation. Modern conflicts increasingly involve cyber operations against critical infrastructure. An attack on energy facilities could increase the risk of retaliatory cyberattacks targeting energy, transportation, or other critical infrastructure elsewhere
other than it is a war crime which i don't think america has a problem to commit one.
If we are being realistic, the Iranian government loves to see its people miserable. First of all, the lack of electricity and water does not target the regime in any way and has no effect whatsoever on Iran's missile launches. It only makes the people more dependent on the government and the control of thoughts becomes stronger.
--
Global energy prices could spike. Iran is a major oil producer and sits on the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant share of the world's seaborne oil and LNG passes. Damage to Iranian energy infrastructure or retaliation affecting Gulf shipping could reduce supplies and increase oil and gas prices worldwide, affecting inflation and economic growth.
It could trigger broader retaliation. Iran has repeatedly indicated it would respond asymmetrically. Retaliation could include missile or drone attacks on oil facilities in neighboring Gulf states, attacks on shipping, cyberattacks, or strikes on U.S. bases and partners in the region, potentially widening the conflict.
Civilian consequences could be severe. Energy infrastructure often supports essential civilian services. Electricity powers hospitals, water treatment plants, communications, and food distribution. Long-term outages can create humanitarian crises even if military facilities are not directly targeted. International humanitarian law requires distinction and proportionality in attacks, and civilian infrastructure receives significant legal protection unless it has become a lawful military objective.
The political objective may not be achieved. Damaging infrastructure can impose economic costs, but history shows that states under external attack do not necessarily change core national security policies. Instead, attacks can strengthen domestic support for a government's resistance or encourage further escalation. This is a recurring observation in studies of coercive air campaigns.
Long-term regional instability. Even if military operations succeeded tactically, rebuilding energy infrastructure can take years. Extended disruptions could affect neighboring economies, investment, and regional energy markets long after fighting ends.
Cyber escalation. Modern conflicts increasingly involve cyber operations against critical infrastructure. An attack on energy facilities could increase the risk of retaliatory cyberattacks targeting energy, transportation, or other critical infrastructure elsewhere
US actions makes me feel like khamenei was the good guy and that's how delusional trump is making me.
1784164228_1.mp4 (2.8 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:01:52, They crossed every line._243_355.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1784164228_2.mp4 (10.2 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:03:30, SNEAKO Reacts to Asmongold’s cold hearted dismissal of the Iran Elementary School Bombing-SUzXy5J9pZo.mp4) [play once] [loop]
did the asmongold become totally a goy shill?
>first vid
saying we should pull up a chengis khan on iran, you know what those words carries?
chengis killed near 15 million iranians, death of many innocent and raping women and children.
so is that Americans think? just because your ego hurt u couldn't easily pull up a regime change, so you should go massacre everyone there?
--
>the iranian government and the iranian people represent an existential threat to the entire world and most importantly western civilization.
the iranian people... and the whole western civilization
>why the hate israel? , one of the big reasons why is because israel is supported by america
>they want to kill european leaders
i don't think i heard more retarded take on this situation
that's why military expert usually talk about war related news not braindead streamers such as asmon and hassan
>second vid
i never seen someone be this dehumanized against hearing of children dying in a war.
"if we do it, its collateral, but if they do it they are bad" despite iran hasn't killed any israeli or american children yet.
"eah those kids shouldnt have been funding terror groups and antagonizing a world super power like america"
>first vid
saying we should pull up a chengis khan on iran, you know what those words carries?
chengis killed near 15 million iranians, death of many innocent and raping women and children.
so is that Americans think? just because your ego hurt u couldn't easily pull up a regime change, so you should go massacre everyone there?
--
>the iranian government and the iranian people represent an existential threat to the entire world and most importantly western civilization.
the iranian people... and the whole western civilization
>why the hate israel? , one of the big reasons why is because israel is supported by america
>they want to kill european leaders
i don't think i heard more retarded take on this situation
that's why military expert usually talk about war related news not braindead streamers such as asmon and hassan
>second vid
i never seen someone be this dehumanized against hearing of children dying in a war.
"if we do it, its collateral, but if they do it they are bad" despite iran hasn't killed any israeli or american children yet.
"eah those kids shouldnt have been funding terror groups and antagonizing a world super power like america"
>>407109
>Did [Unkempt liberal Twitch streamer who gives his commentary on political clickbait Twitter posts] become [retarded]?
No, they don't ever become retarded. They were born retarded.
>Did [Unkempt liberal Twitch streamer who gives his commentary on political clickbait Twitter posts] become [retarded]?
No, they don't ever become retarded. They were born retarded.
>>407118
>liberal
i don't think so, i never seen a warmongering lib like ever
the problem is that these people have huge influence on younglings, feed the bullshit government agenda every day to how to think.
and this madar jendeh was against israel during epstein files and he is fully pro-israel now?
bipolar crack head.
>liberal
i don't think so, i never seen a warmongering lib like ever
the problem is that these people have huge influence on younglings, feed the bullshit government agenda every day to how to think.
and this madar jendeh was against israel during epstein files and he is fully pro-israel now?
bipolar crack head.
>>407120
>i never seen a warmongering lib like ever
Just about every Liberal advocates for mass immigration of browns in to White countries. They cultivate and celebrate the invasion. That's war, and they're mongering it like they mongle cocks.
>this madar jendeh was against israel during epstein files and he is fully pro-israel now?
That's pretty much every Twitch commentary streamer. They have no values of their own. They don't need them, because all they need in order to get payed is an audience viewing ads. To achieve the biggest audience, the commentators can make sure the side of the debate they espouse is the majority held by their viewerbase. A television news anchor, regardless of how he feels about a breaking event, will only get payed if he reads what is written on the teleprompter. The streamers have their own sort of teleprompter in the form of a collection of Twitter posts from other popular commentators and reporters. If the collective teleprompter is biased toward one side, so will the commentators, and their commentary then contributes to that bias. An echo-chamber. Agreeing with this majority is all that streamers like Hasan and Asmon need to do. The rare times they go off of this collective script and divulge a bit about their own personal views, it usually culminates in them developing a public reputation as someone who wants to either fuck dogs, or electrocute dogs.
They were naming Jews during the Epstein saga because that's what most people were doing. They're pro-Isreal now because anti-Israel sentiment has been deemed illegal so all that is visible is pro-Isreal sentiment, giving the impression that it's the most popular side. It's tiresome and we can laugh at how epic fail these streamers are, but you're right about how influential these retards are to young people. Even if these kids don't scroll Twitter or watch YouTube, they're still downstream of those platforms because that's where their favorite commentators get all of their information. Minuscule alterations to the algorithms and rules on these platforms can have a huge snowball effect on the public consensus of any given issue by making one side of the debate appear to be the dominant (or only) one.
>i never seen a warmongering lib like ever
Just about every Liberal advocates for mass immigration of browns in to White countries. They cultivate and celebrate the invasion. That's war, and they're mongering it like they mongle cocks.
>this madar jendeh was against israel during epstein files and he is fully pro-israel now?
That's pretty much every Twitch commentary streamer. They have no values of their own. They don't need them, because all they need in order to get payed is an audience viewing ads. To achieve the biggest audience, the commentators can make sure the side of the debate they espouse is the majority held by their viewerbase. A television news anchor, regardless of how he feels about a breaking event, will only get payed if he reads what is written on the teleprompter. The streamers have their own sort of teleprompter in the form of a collection of Twitter posts from other popular commentators and reporters. If the collective teleprompter is biased toward one side, so will the commentators, and their commentary then contributes to that bias. An echo-chamber. Agreeing with this majority is all that streamers like Hasan and Asmon need to do. The rare times they go off of this collective script and divulge a bit about their own personal views, it usually culminates in them developing a public reputation as someone who wants to either fuck dogs, or electrocute dogs.
They were naming Jews during the Epstein saga because that's what most people were doing. They're pro-Isreal now because anti-Israel sentiment has been deemed illegal so all that is visible is pro-Isreal sentiment, giving the impression that it's the most popular side. It's tiresome and we can laugh at how epic fail these streamers are, but you're right about how influential these retards are to young people. Even if these kids don't scroll Twitter or watch YouTube, they're still downstream of those platforms because that's where their favorite commentators get all of their information. Minuscule alterations to the algorithms and rules on these platforms can have a huge snowball effect on the public consensus of any given issue by making one side of the debate appear to be the dominant (or only) one.
>>407126
pretty much all they do is to create a circlejerk for the audience they attract, so whatever you search "iran is losing'' or no "USA is losing" you find what you want to hear through anger and rage inducing and hate watch.
hassan does have an agenda, so his uncle, the young turks, a pro-immigrant eastern value defending center.
asmon all of the sudden got into politics when he realized it gives him so much views. he couldn't get into left leaning crowd, cause there are more popular ones out there such as destiny and hassan and etc.
and also he says he is centrist, but centrist my ass, he clearly is a trump and maga dick rider.
it started since pro-palestine and pro-israel crowd start to shine, like it's a fucking football team.
this is exactly like CNN vs FOX , both of them are full of shit, and manipulate people in whatever party they represent.
US politics is just ragebait at this point.
like there is absolutely no balance in how they act.
but overall i have a strong feeling asmongold can be a glownnigger cause i never seen anyone agrees with whatever the current government does and be a fan of it. and he has a huge influence on kids so i would suggest it's a good strategy.
>>407142
i made a thread there...even tho got duplicated.
pretty much all they do is to create a circlejerk for the audience they attract, so whatever you search "iran is losing'' or no "USA is losing" you find what you want to hear through anger and rage inducing and hate watch.
hassan does have an agenda, so his uncle, the young turks, a pro-immigrant eastern value defending center.
asmon all of the sudden got into politics when he realized it gives him so much views. he couldn't get into left leaning crowd, cause there are more popular ones out there such as destiny and hassan and etc.
and also he says he is centrist, but centrist my ass, he clearly is a trump and maga dick rider.
it started since pro-palestine and pro-israel crowd start to shine, like it's a fucking football team.
this is exactly like CNN vs FOX , both of them are full of shit, and manipulate people in whatever party they represent.
US politics is just ragebait at this point.
like there is absolutely no balance in how they act.
but overall i have a strong feeling asmongold can be a glownnigger cause i never seen anyone agrees with whatever the current government does and be a fan of it. and he has a huge influence on kids so i would suggest it's a good strategy.
>>407142
i made a thread there...even tho got duplicated.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-269] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
269 replies | 85 files | 88 UUIDs | Page 1