Friendship is power. Friendship is power of authority and control, but not that type of friendship that you know from family and school. I want to share some knowledge about military grade friendship, which can be useful, if you want to create your own organization of militants, religious sect, or elite group.
There is 2 kinds of friendship:
1. Equal. Common ground, mutual respect, help to each other. Friendship of commoners.
2. Hierarchical. Common goal, confidence, vassal's dependence. Friendship of aristocracy.
First type of friendship pleasant thing, but actually not very useful. There is 2 major problems:
- Communications. If you can't control contacts between your friends, they can betray and replace you.
- Time expenditure. You can't use your time effective with this type of group. Your goal is orders, not meetings.
First type of friendship looks like graph, where each friend communicates with others. If your trusted group have 6 members this means up to 36 connections every single day. Horizontal connections useful for work duties, but to shape group in effective form you must annihilate any connections, except 6 last bridges under your direct control. Any co-operation between vassals must be limited. In most effective groups vassals don't know each other at all, because of safety reasons. The group in power must be invisible.
To make your group effective your goal is to make friendship with one level lower caste (vassals) and one level higher (suzerain) but ignore your own class (knights). Every single elite group developed through parasitic control over some organization. If any external force can communicate with your group only through your personal control, this is the first level of authority. If each member of your group creates own group with 6 members, there is second level. If you help them to occupy key positions in organization, there is third level. If you achieved the power to destroy your organization, you have the first title. Ronin. Friendship with your group is beneficial, and your extermination may be too expensive. The real power of elite group is power of destruction.
Any security mechanisms useless against newborn groups of insiders. They are just too unnoticeable, too harmless. Any high rank manager can make this kind of group in less than few years, since he already know weak spots of organization perfectly. I think, every one meet this kind of groups sometimes, who helps each other. Our theory of elites call them shards or embryos. But usually humans are stupid and leaders exploit this groups just to make money without any promotions to vassals. There is no friendship, just exploitation. So, shards are degrade and someone just betray leader after some time. But you are different, right? Different enough to make just one step further?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
>>395028
With some recon you can found this structures around your organization:
- 1 powerful group (1 suzerain, 4-10 knights, 120 vassals)
- 5 local groups (1 ronin and 30 vassals for each)
- 25 shards/embryos (5-10 members)
Usually powerful group is part of one of national parties (ignore any foreigners, they are zogdogs). The whole suzerain-knights-vassals system is less than 2% of population (with their families and relatives), so there is less than 0.01% knights, 0.001% suzerains. Usually less than 10 suzerains in million city. Local groups mostly nationalistic: latinos, pajeets, chinks, muslims, or just criminals. Every single white suzerain has constant problems with them, so if your activities will be detected (be sure it will be at "ronin" level) you can expected not problems, but actually good kind of amusement. Seriously. White groups are fucking rare. If you are not criminal, you can expected "knight" title immediately. Better to have upstart ally than nothing. There is almost civil war situation, you know.
The alliance between suzerain and knight just like alliance between you and one of your vassals. Each vassal has your protection, each vassal expect from you regular promotions. You expect dog-level loyalty. Vassal must execute any order without arguing. Vassal must ignore any orders from organization without your permission. Vassal must speak truth in any case. Vassal should not steal from the group. Actually less than 5% of personal in any organization can follow this basic rules, so there is always shortage of good knights and vassals. Also, even less understand that there is no loyalty to organization, ideology, or even religion. Only direct human to human loyalty, or tribal connections between families in oldest and most respectable groups.
Usually suzerain has 3-4 effective knights in his group, 3 newbie knights without hierarchy of vassals, 3 retirees. Usually group has no more than 150 vassals (Dunbar's number) and 3 level of hierarchical structure. If suzerain obtained suitable ronin from outside, he can promote one of his trustworthy knights to highest structure and help him to achieve control over it. Local suzerains are recruiters for their parties, but they use their knights to occupy positions in new organizations and then drag the whole group to new levels of authority. So each suzerains absolutely dependent on loyalty and leadership skills of his knights. Knight are extremely valuable.
This is not easy to control communications of 6 friends. The "ronin" level control of 36 vassals and single organization is tricky objective. But 150-members group with constant goal of promotions and career is full day work for suzerain. Actually about 10 hours daily 300 days per year (no horizontal connections inside group, you know). Major threat is not corruption, but betrayal. Actually this is the only one threat, which can destroy suzerain's political career completely. So, promotions for newbie knights is slow in peaceful times (tens of years, really, sometimes generations). But peaceful times is not our situation.
Power of hierarchical friendship is direct support, protection and promotions. From suzerain to his knights, from Knight to his vassals. The authority of the group is combined resources (positions, funds, organizations, media) of all knights and vassals. Suzerain creates strategy and concentrated resources of his group to breach resistance of other parties and conquer better positions. But real power of suzerain is his sovereign. There is always rules of war.
With some recon you can found this structures around your organization:
- 1 powerful group (1 suzerain, 4-10 knights, 120 vassals)
- 5 local groups (1 ronin and 30 vassals for each)
- 25 shards/embryos (5-10 members)
Usually powerful group is part of one of national parties (ignore any foreigners, they are zogdogs). The whole suzerain-knights-vassals system is less than 2% of population (with their families and relatives), so there is less than 0.01% knights, 0.001% suzerains. Usually less than 10 suzerains in million city. Local groups mostly nationalistic: latinos, pajeets, chinks, muslims, or just criminals. Every single white suzerain has constant problems with them, so if your activities will be detected (be sure it will be at "ronin" level) you can expected not problems, but actually good kind of amusement. Seriously. White groups are fucking rare. If you are not criminal, you can expected "knight" title immediately. Better to have upstart ally than nothing. There is almost civil war situation, you know.
The alliance between suzerain and knight just like alliance between you and one of your vassals. Each vassal has your protection, each vassal expect from you regular promotions. You expect dog-level loyalty. Vassal must execute any order without arguing. Vassal must ignore any orders from organization without your permission. Vassal must speak truth in any case. Vassal should not steal from the group. Actually less than 5% of personal in any organization can follow this basic rules, so there is always shortage of good knights and vassals. Also, even less understand that there is no loyalty to organization, ideology, or even religion. Only direct human to human loyalty, or tribal connections between families in oldest and most respectable groups.
Usually suzerain has 3-4 effective knights in his group, 3 newbie knights without hierarchy of vassals, 3 retirees. Usually group has no more than 150 vassals (Dunbar's number) and 3 level of hierarchical structure. If suzerain obtained suitable ronin from outside, he can promote one of his trustworthy knights to highest structure and help him to achieve control over it. Local suzerains are recruiters for their parties, but they use their knights to occupy positions in new organizations and then drag the whole group to new levels of authority. So each suzerains absolutely dependent on loyalty and leadership skills of his knights. Knight are extremely valuable.
This is not easy to control communications of 6 friends. The "ronin" level control of 36 vassals and single organization is tricky objective. But 150-members group with constant goal of promotions and career is full day work for suzerain. Actually about 10 hours daily 300 days per year (no horizontal connections inside group, you know). Major threat is not corruption, but betrayal. Actually this is the only one threat, which can destroy suzerain's political career completely. So, promotions for newbie knights is slow in peaceful times (tens of years, really, sometimes generations). But peaceful times is not our situation.
Power of hierarchical friendship is direct support, protection and promotions. From suzerain to his knights, from Knight to his vassals. The authority of the group is combined resources (positions, funds, organizations, media) of all knights and vassals. Suzerain creates strategy and concentrated resources of his group to breach resistance of other parties and conquer better positions. But real power of suzerain is his sovereign. There is always rules of war.
>>395028
Coordinator can control only 10-12 leaders (usually 6-7 objects of control). In practice this objects is:
1. Security subgroup (one of retirees)
2. Accountant subgroup (one of retirees)
3. Intelligence subgroup (successor or trusted squire)
4. First knight with 60 vassals
5. Second knight with 30 vassals
6. Third knight with 15 vassals
7. First squire with 10 vassals
8. Second squire with 5 vassals
9. Third squire without vassals
Position 1-3 is the core (less than 25 members). Treachery from the core is devastating, so there is only family members, servants and trusted friends. Reasonable suzerain always trying to use marriage to bind friends to his family. Horizontal connections in the core possible, but not very useful. Power is all about control over communications. Properly educated family members is the most loyal and controllable assets of group.
But knights much better as leaders, managers and experts. There is always some balance between trustworthy core at 1-3 positions and professional knights at 4-6 positions. Finally, there is 7-9 up to 7-15 positions for squires, who is not very useful. Some of them are observers from highest group (typical initial career and tests for youngest sons), some is suzerain relatives with leadership skills, some just professionals from organization with some potential. Overall squires is worthless compared to knights, especially if knight start as ronin. Knights is the most valuable assets of group, but in most effective groups knights don't know each other.
Despite hierarchical structure family-based groups surprisingly durable. If suzerain was dead, his security substitute or accountant will replace him before successor. Sometimes for years. Almost each group has connections with highest group (usually through squires) and sovereign prefer to see trusted family member than some upstart knight, who seize power over successor. Knight can't be successor in healthy group. If suzerain is 70 years old man, his knights will be 60-70 years old and squires 30-50 years old. There is majorat (inheritance from father to oldest son) or secundogeniture (from grandfather to most suitable grandson). Secundogeniture need strong national and religious foundation. Groups with secundogeniture more effective but less stable. However almost all of 50 know dynasties with 150+ year history has secundogeniture tradition.
Coordinator can control only 10-12 leaders (usually 6-7 objects of control). In practice this objects is:
1. Security subgroup (one of retirees)
2. Accountant subgroup (one of retirees)
3. Intelligence subgroup (successor or trusted squire)
4. First knight with 60 vassals
5. Second knight with 30 vassals
6. Third knight with 15 vassals
7. First squire with 10 vassals
8. Second squire with 5 vassals
9. Third squire without vassals
Position 1-3 is the core (less than 25 members). Treachery from the core is devastating, so there is only family members, servants and trusted friends. Reasonable suzerain always trying to use marriage to bind friends to his family. Horizontal connections in the core possible, but not very useful. Power is all about control over communications. Properly educated family members is the most loyal and controllable assets of group.
But knights much better as leaders, managers and experts. There is always some balance between trustworthy core at 1-3 positions and professional knights at 4-6 positions. Finally, there is 7-9 up to 7-15 positions for squires, who is not very useful. Some of them are observers from highest group (typical initial career and tests for youngest sons), some is suzerain relatives with leadership skills, some just professionals from organization with some potential. Overall squires is worthless compared to knights, especially if knight start as ronin. Knights is the most valuable assets of group, but in most effective groups knights don't know each other.
Despite hierarchical structure family-based groups surprisingly durable. If suzerain was dead, his security substitute or accountant will replace him before successor. Sometimes for years. Almost each group has connections with highest group (usually through squires) and sovereign prefer to see trusted family member than some upstart knight, who seize power over successor. Knight can't be successor in healthy group. If suzerain is 70 years old man, his knights will be 60-70 years old and squires 30-50 years old. There is majorat (inheritance from father to oldest son) or secundogeniture (from grandfather to most suitable grandson). Secundogeniture need strong national and religious foundation. Groups with secundogeniture more effective but less stable. However almost all of 50 know dynasties with 150+ year history has secundogeniture tradition.
>>395028
The power is about power, not business, not organization efficacy. Elite groups is not managers, but owners. Bureaucracy and expertise is parallel systems. Compared to them elites is some kind of national immunity. They control key positions in organization (finances, purchases, personnel department) and uses this positions as strongpoints against foreign groups. Money is secondary thing, control always more valuable than profit.
Suzerain and his knights are pure leaders and careerists, they can pass through dozen of organization through lifetime. There is typical schedule of coordinator. As you can see there is no time for professional work, only maintenance of his group through communications. Usually suzerain has 150-250 contacts in his library. He uses rarest contacts for intelligence, this is hardest and most dangerous part of his work.
Suzerain spend at least 60 minutes per week to communicate with each knight. If less, you are not knight, but vassal. If more, you are trusted friend. Servants is just driver, secretary, doctor, etc, workers in group core (security/accountant/intelligence subgroups). Vassals is your assets, every single suzerain trying to maintain some connections with them in the case of the knight's dead or treachery. But healthy groups has etiquette and usually suzerain meet vassals in the presence of their knight.
Overall there is three simple rules:
- Vassal of my vassal is not my vassal.
- Suzerain of my suzerain is not my suzerain.
- Vassal of my suzerain is not my friend, but competitor.
The power is about power, not business, not organization efficacy. Elite groups is not managers, but owners. Bureaucracy and expertise is parallel systems. Compared to them elites is some kind of national immunity. They control key positions in organization (finances, purchases, personnel department) and uses this positions as strongpoints against foreign groups. Money is secondary thing, control always more valuable than profit.
Suzerain and his knights are pure leaders and careerists, they can pass through dozen of organization through lifetime. There is typical schedule of coordinator. As you can see there is no time for professional work, only maintenance of his group through communications. Usually suzerain has 150-250 contacts in his library. He uses rarest contacts for intelligence, this is hardest and most dangerous part of his work.
Schedule | Assets | Hours per asset | Commentary
------------- | ------ | --------------- | ----------------------------
8:00 - 10:00 | 128 | 4 h 42 m | Intelligence, studies, trips
10:00 - 12:00 | 64 | 9 h 24 m | Vassals, 30 minutes/month
12:00 - 14:00 | 32 | 19 hours/year | Vassals, 60 minutes/month
14:00 - 16:00 | 16 | 38 | Servants, 30 minutes/week
16:00 - 18:00 | 8 | 75 | Knights, 60 minutes/week
18:00 - 20:00 | 4 | 150 | Friends, 30 minutes/day
20:00 - 22:00 | 2 | 300 | Family, 60 minutes/day
22:00 - 24:00 | 1 | 600 | Family, 120 minutes/day
Suzerain spend at least 60 minutes per week to communicate with each knight. If less, you are not knight, but vassal. If more, you are trusted friend. Servants is just driver, secretary, doctor, etc, workers in group core (security/accountant/intelligence subgroups). Vassals is your assets, every single suzerain trying to maintain some connections with them in the case of the knight's dead or treachery. But healthy groups has etiquette and usually suzerain meet vassals in the presence of their knight.
Overall there is three simple rules:
- Vassal of my vassal is not my vassal.
- Suzerain of my suzerain is not my suzerain.
- Vassal of my suzerain is not my friend, but competitor.
>>395028
Nowadays almost all white parties has problems with number of knights. Higher level groups declining and trying to use lowest groups to recruit as many ronins as possible and send own trustworthy knights on higher positions. So, if you crave for power, just make your own group with effective hierarchy. Show your power of destruction, but do not make crimes. Find your lord. Be loyal to your lord, your vassals, your family, your people and your religion. And maybe you will be remembered after this dark times.
Signs of healthy group:
- Religious and nationalistic family.
- Numerous kids with noticeable etiquette.
- Strong cryptography (Vernam cipher)
- No group chats, only emails.
- Invisibility to outsiders.
- Maniacal time management.
- Retiree ronins in core.
If you meet this kind of group and suzerain said that he created his dynasty about 30 years ago, this is strong group with lifespan expectancy of 75 years. If he got his group as legacy from father, this is declining group with life expectancy of 40-50 years. If he got his group as legacy from grandfather and family still has all healthy signs, this is extremely durable dynasty with life expectancy of 100 years.
Nowadays almost all white parties has problems with number of knights. Higher level groups declining and trying to use lowest groups to recruit as many ronins as possible and send own trustworthy knights on higher positions. So, if you crave for power, just make your own group with effective hierarchy. Show your power of destruction, but do not make crimes. Find your lord. Be loyal to your lord, your vassals, your family, your people and your religion. And maybe you will be remembered after this dark times.
Signs of healthy group:
- Religious and nationalistic family.
- Numerous kids with noticeable etiquette.
- Strong cryptography (Vernam cipher)
- No group chats, only emails.
- Invisibility to outsiders.
- Maniacal time management.
- Retiree ronins in core.
If you meet this kind of group and suzerain said that he created his dynasty about 30 years ago, this is strong group with lifespan expectancy of 75 years. If he got his group as legacy from father, this is declining group with life expectancy of 40-50 years. If he got his group as legacy from grandfather and family still has all healthy signs, this is extremely durable dynasty with life expectancy of 100 years.
What you describe is very different from the concept of friendship. I think the closer term is master/subordinate, or perhaps employment, with an emphasis on loyalty and filial piety.
You go off though, foreigner/VPN user. I'm intrigued.
You go off though, foreigner/VPN user. I'm intrigued.
>>395028
>>395089
Yes, this is vassalage, classical feudalism. Now-vanished from eyes of general public, but survived and still development inside criminal groups, intelligence services and national elites. Vassalage, like artisian guilds or religious military orders, is the one of almost forgotten forms of social networks. Different from modern tradition of equal friendship, but actually positive and magnetic.
- Friendship is voluntary. Vassalage is voluntary too. Although you can't break vassalage like friendship, at least without permission from your suzerain.
- Friendship do not tolerate coercion, as well as vassalage. The whole thing about vassalage is to make from your person the most dominant fatherly figure. The confessor for your vassals.
- Friendship is emotional and educative. vassalage can show much stronger, almost drug-level experience. The actual consensus between senpai and kohai, like in hacker group.
- Friendship is mutually beneficial. Vassalage is ten times more profitable for both sides just because of hierarchy and combined efforts.
But vassalage utterly asymmetric, this is the hardest part. Take a look at coordinator's schedule again. There is almost no time for hobby, for self-education, only control, control, control. So, even well-educated person slowly degrading with this kind of work. Brilliant social intelligence, but mostly outdated professional skills. And now take a look at the newborn ronin. A man about 50 years old with serious position and own staff, a leader, who craves more power, a professional who still have time to maintain modern knowledge and make own research. There is reverse asymmetric situation! Inevitable frustration and serious chance of betrayal. Even if suzerain trying his best, this is extremely hard to be fatherly figure for this kind of person. Just imagine how many medieval wars started just because of this kind of situation.
There is a lot of copium to control knights in feudal system. Religion, nationalism, family ties. The figure of sovereign (or figure of god for poor emperor, who don't have own sovereign!) The cast system before modern age, when suzerains preferred to raise out-of-class vagrants to make them fully dependent on family ties with group. Finally, modern theater of illusions, where suzerain actually helps his knights to achieve highest positions than he has for own family, but the whole system makes betrayal of group extremely unprofitable, and poor knights drag the whole group forward like locomotives.
Strong side of modern feudalism, that you can't achieve more power through blood. There is no crowds, no collective meetings, only face-to-face connections, only bridges. If you kill suzerain and his family, you can't seize group property. There is no towns and castles, only connections. If you kill your own vassal without agreement with every single person in his group, you just burn bridge to his position and his part of network. There is why modern vassalage so strongly against any horizontal connections. They are not just parasitic, but actually dangerous. Feudal social network is not wheel, but crystal tree on the hill of fallen shards.
The stupid ones, the greedy ones, the bloody ones, they are just fallen shards.
>>395089
Yes, this is vassalage, classical feudalism. Now-vanished from eyes of general public, but survived and still development inside criminal groups, intelligence services and national elites. Vassalage, like artisian guilds or religious military orders, is the one of almost forgotten forms of social networks. Different from modern tradition of equal friendship, but actually positive and magnetic.
- Friendship is voluntary. Vassalage is voluntary too. Although you can't break vassalage like friendship, at least without permission from your suzerain.
- Friendship do not tolerate coercion, as well as vassalage. The whole thing about vassalage is to make from your person the most dominant fatherly figure. The confessor for your vassals.
- Friendship is emotional and educative. vassalage can show much stronger, almost drug-level experience. The actual consensus between senpai and kohai, like in hacker group.
- Friendship is mutually beneficial. Vassalage is ten times more profitable for both sides just because of hierarchy and combined efforts.
But vassalage utterly asymmetric, this is the hardest part. Take a look at coordinator's schedule again. There is almost no time for hobby, for self-education, only control, control, control. So, even well-educated person slowly degrading with this kind of work. Brilliant social intelligence, but mostly outdated professional skills. And now take a look at the newborn ronin. A man about 50 years old with serious position and own staff, a leader, who craves more power, a professional who still have time to maintain modern knowledge and make own research. There is reverse asymmetric situation! Inevitable frustration and serious chance of betrayal. Even if suzerain trying his best, this is extremely hard to be fatherly figure for this kind of person. Just imagine how many medieval wars started just because of this kind of situation.
There is a lot of copium to control knights in feudal system. Religion, nationalism, family ties. The figure of sovereign (or figure of god for poor emperor, who don't have own sovereign!) The cast system before modern age, when suzerains preferred to raise out-of-class vagrants to make them fully dependent on family ties with group. Finally, modern theater of illusions, where suzerain actually helps his knights to achieve highest positions than he has for own family, but the whole system makes betrayal of group extremely unprofitable, and poor knights drag the whole group forward like locomotives.
Strong side of modern feudalism, that you can't achieve more power through blood. There is no crowds, no collective meetings, only face-to-face connections, only bridges. If you kill suzerain and his family, you can't seize group property. There is no towns and castles, only connections. If you kill your own vassal without agreement with every single person in his group, you just burn bridge to his position and his part of network. There is why modern vassalage so strongly against any horizontal connections. They are not just parasitic, but actually dangerous. Feudal social network is not wheel, but crystal tree on the hill of fallen shards.
The stupid ones, the greedy ones, the bloody ones, they are just fallen shards.
>>395028
Parties with 20k members (1 sovereign, 150 suzerains, 1500 knights, 18k vassals) are colossal political machines. They have inertia. Direct order from sovereign can be completely distorted through 3+ levels of communication links. So, sovereign need public image not only for legitimacy, but just to make things work. Public image actually not for general public, but for this 18k vassals. They know course of the party from the news.
Groups inside party have specializations: military, business, media. This is three whales of control. Nationalistic party can have 60% groups with military positions, 30% business assets, 10% media. Globalhomo corporation can have 60% groups inside financial organizations, 30% media, 10% military. No party can exist without destructive power, funds and media coverage, so 10% of party's attention is bare minimum for each major asset.
Sovereign. 1 per 10 millions of population. Usually 60-80 years old. Political figure with public image and high formal position. Without any power over his head, sovereign uses all possible methods of legitimacy. And just to save communication links with vassals if his party under serious pressure (arrests, assassinations, wartime). Sovereign can't be killed without civil war level of escalation, because of destructive power of his party. But he can lose control over party quite fast during internal struggle.
Suzerain. 1 per 100k of population. Usually 60-80 years old (almost always same generation as sovereign, because of communication problem between generations). Major coordinator and leader of his clan. Always has competition with other suzerains inside party, but without actual war. Always has defensive type of war with other parties inside country and partial control over major organizations because of this. Suzerains usually has some specialization (like insurance, maritime trade, police, state government) but can change role of his clan in decade or two, if he conquered rich organization or lost major asset.
Knight. 1 per 10k of population. Usually 40-60 years old (half-generation or one generation distance from suzerain). Major leaders and professionals. Offensive force of political clan. Unlike suzerain knight can't be woman or man with introvert personality, since stressful work (unlike suzerain he don't have stable position to ignore failures). Knights has shorter lifespan, but fast career. About 40% of knights is retirees with some formal position and small group of vassals, but work to death is usual thing.
Squire. 1 par 10k of population. Usually 20-40 years old (generation gap with rest of party). Second generation of knight's family. Too weak to do knight's duties. Still gather his staff and professional experience, but too conceited to be satisfied with vassal role. Squares is the weak spot of feudal system, but any knight expected good position for his family after all his efforts. Usual solution "put them in a garret" which means high position without much responsibility and vassals.
Ronin. 1 per 5-10k of population. Usually 40-60 years. Antithesis of squire, who lost his suzerain but managed to safe his subgroup and personnel assets during following tempest. Or mostly just local leader, who managed to create own group without fatal mistakes and seize some power over organization. Just because of evolution pressure ronins is most talented professionals and leaders. They cannot suppress problems by moneys and call for higher forces, after all.
Servant. 1 per 5k of population. Any age, sex or background, 130+ IQ. Loyal and talented worker in group core. Intelligence and military officials, managers and experts, media persons. Or just driver, tutor, doctor, secretary. Major assets, sometimes even more valuable than knights. They know how to make organizations grow, but unlike knights they do not have careerism or leadership skills to be dangerous. Political clan protect them and allow them to have horizontal connections in their professional sphere, even if they are major source of leaks. Usually elites raise servants from colleges with help of vassals in administration. Students better than successful professionals because of lack of connections.
Vassal. 1% of population (30% of officials). Observer under protection of some kind of hidden hierarchical group. 1/3 of vassals is part of political clans, 1/3 is local groups, 1/3 is shards. So, there is only 10% official positions in military, business and media under direct control of political parties, because of constant shortage of knights and other limitations. Clans promoted vassals to key positions (at least finances and personnel department). Vassals is not talented workers or leaders, they need constant support to maintain positions. The only two elements is important: honesty and loyalty. Professional skills is secondary (too uncontrollable career and insipid job to maintain them).
Elites all about power, they noticeable bad with work duties. They used servants for general planning, hired managers for actual work, and vassals for control. Usually they don't disrupt organization activities at all. They are not mind of humanity, but immune system.
Parties with 20k members (1 sovereign, 150 suzerains, 1500 knights, 18k vassals) are colossal political machines. They have inertia. Direct order from sovereign can be completely distorted through 3+ levels of communication links. So, sovereign need public image not only for legitimacy, but just to make things work. Public image actually not for general public, but for this 18k vassals. They know course of the party from the news.
Groups inside party have specializations: military, business, media. This is three whales of control. Nationalistic party can have 60% groups with military positions, 30% business assets, 10% media. Globalhomo corporation can have 60% groups inside financial organizations, 30% media, 10% military. No party can exist without destructive power, funds and media coverage, so 10% of party's attention is bare minimum for each major asset.
Sovereign. 1 per 10 millions of population. Usually 60-80 years old. Political figure with public image and high formal position. Without any power over his head, sovereign uses all possible methods of legitimacy. And just to save communication links with vassals if his party under serious pressure (arrests, assassinations, wartime). Sovereign can't be killed without civil war level of escalation, because of destructive power of his party. But he can lose control over party quite fast during internal struggle.
Suzerain. 1 per 100k of population. Usually 60-80 years old (almost always same generation as sovereign, because of communication problem between generations). Major coordinator and leader of his clan. Always has competition with other suzerains inside party, but without actual war. Always has defensive type of war with other parties inside country and partial control over major organizations because of this. Suzerains usually has some specialization (like insurance, maritime trade, police, state government) but can change role of his clan in decade or two, if he conquered rich organization or lost major asset.
Knight. 1 per 10k of population. Usually 40-60 years old (half-generation or one generation distance from suzerain). Major leaders and professionals. Offensive force of political clan. Unlike suzerain knight can't be woman or man with introvert personality, since stressful work (unlike suzerain he don't have stable position to ignore failures). Knights has shorter lifespan, but fast career. About 40% of knights is retirees with some formal position and small group of vassals, but work to death is usual thing.
Squire. 1 par 10k of population. Usually 20-40 years old (generation gap with rest of party). Second generation of knight's family. Too weak to do knight's duties. Still gather his staff and professional experience, but too conceited to be satisfied with vassal role. Squares is the weak spot of feudal system, but any knight expected good position for his family after all his efforts. Usual solution "put them in a garret" which means high position without much responsibility and vassals.
Ronin. 1 per 5-10k of population. Usually 40-60 years. Antithesis of squire, who lost his suzerain but managed to safe his subgroup and personnel assets during following tempest. Or mostly just local leader, who managed to create own group without fatal mistakes and seize some power over organization. Just because of evolution pressure ronins is most talented professionals and leaders. They cannot suppress problems by moneys and call for higher forces, after all.
Servant. 1 per 5k of population. Any age, sex or background, 130+ IQ. Loyal and talented worker in group core. Intelligence and military officials, managers and experts, media persons. Or just driver, tutor, doctor, secretary. Major assets, sometimes even more valuable than knights. They know how to make organizations grow, but unlike knights they do not have careerism or leadership skills to be dangerous. Political clan protect them and allow them to have horizontal connections in their professional sphere, even if they are major source of leaks. Usually elites raise servants from colleges with help of vassals in administration. Students better than successful professionals because of lack of connections.
Vassal. 1% of population (30% of officials). Observer under protection of some kind of hidden hierarchical group. 1/3 of vassals is part of political clans, 1/3 is local groups, 1/3 is shards. So, there is only 10% official positions in military, business and media under direct control of political parties, because of constant shortage of knights and other limitations. Clans promoted vassals to key positions (at least finances and personnel department). Vassals is not talented workers or leaders, they need constant support to maintain positions. The only two elements is important: honesty and loyalty. Professional skills is secondary (too uncontrollable career and insipid job to maintain them).
Elites all about power, they noticeable bad with work duties. They used servants for general planning, hired managers for actual work, and vassals for control. Usually they don't disrupt organization activities at all. They are not mind of humanity, but immune system.
>>395028
Knights tests honesty and loyalty of all accessible workers from organization (this is why personnel department is major prize). When political clan can afford new vassals, knights suggest suitable person to suzerain. Intelligence subgroup check his background and security subgroup makes more tests. Suzerain just don't want to offer vassalage to asset of hostile party or some local criminal. Quite frequent situation actually. So, usually better to raise vassal from dirt.
Suitable person for vassal role:
- 1-20 years younger than knight and suzerain (not serious generation gap, but some distance)
- Man with family and children (family to family connections is ideal form of control)
- Low level official with some professional skills (IQ>100 with rare exclusions)
- Not tattler, not criminal, not traitor (in any case, most of tests about it)
- Not active worker (problem with work ethic and ties with organization)
- Not talented worker (problem with strong horizontal connections)
But how many this kind of persons around? Let's make demographic slice. 30-50 years old mans about 12% of population. Less than half of them have good health and families with children, so 6% of population. Half of them has IQ>100 for further education, so 3%. Less than half of them have proper personality types for hierarchy and discipline to be silent, so 1.5%. Finally, 30% of them already vassals of other groups, so just 1% of population or 2% of active workforce.
Just 40 suitable persons in organization with 2000 personnel. Maybe 4-8 of them have some problems, which can be used to fortify loyalty and hierarchy. Bare minimum to create local group. This is why suite of vassals follows the knight to capture new organization. Only big and fully controlled organizations can generate new vassals in numbers. But full control mostly illusion, as been said before only 10% official positions can be controlled by one political clan, at least without damage to offensive operations.
Globalhomo parties have serious advantage, they can utilize women, losers without families, young adults, racial minorities. Almost any scum for vassal role. Or just to create local groups, destabilize situation and force other parties to use most of knights for defense. Fortunately zogdogs unstable, easily detectable and can't overpass even 25 years group lifespan. Jews uses this kind of troops as kamikaze bombers. Sometimes literally. If someone suggest vassalage to you, Ignore any possible globalhomo assets. They just want to exploit you to bomb some organization and drop with criminal history. Alas, honorable knights can exploit unsuitable person too. So, be careful, especially if you see ongoing war in your organization.
Knight spend decades to gather good team of vassals. Usually from 1 to 3 new persons per year (take a look at coordinator's schedule again, this means 1 hour/week attention from knight and 1 hour/month attention from suzerain). If 4-6 new vassals per year this is questionable, wherefrom such time? If more than 6 just drop this company immediately, this is 100% kamikaze group or criminals. Start of vassal career cost at least 400 manhours of knight and suzerain work (about million of dollars for USA, since equal money knight can obtain during 400 hours long operation), in addition 1-2 million of dollars for support, education, protection and intelligence during first 5 years, only then vassal began to create profit over expenditures considering risks.
Ronin works like knight, but utilize their own friends and relatives to make vassals. Local groups can be very attractive hirelings (keep in mind that suzerain spend about 100 millions dollars to raise knight with healthy subgroup) but qualities of "local militia" utterly mournful (less that 30% suitable vassals). If someone suggest some kind of vassalage and you don't know him at least 5 years with weekly/monthly contacts, this is not ronin, just ordinary puppet-maker.
When knight moves to seize new organization, he leaves unsuitable vassals behind. They still have some protection and support, but much less attention. We call them "trace". Group with 150 current members has 100-300 old members as trace. Some old organization just retiree houses. This is art of lordship to leave vassals at time, but maintain cheap and effective system to protect them. This system is called "bureaucracy" and "education".
Knights tests honesty and loyalty of all accessible workers from organization (this is why personnel department is major prize). When political clan can afford new vassals, knights suggest suitable person to suzerain. Intelligence subgroup check his background and security subgroup makes more tests. Suzerain just don't want to offer vassalage to asset of hostile party or some local criminal. Quite frequent situation actually. So, usually better to raise vassal from dirt.
Suitable person for vassal role:
- 1-20 years younger than knight and suzerain (not serious generation gap, but some distance)
- Man with family and children (family to family connections is ideal form of control)
- Low level official with some professional skills (IQ>100 with rare exclusions)
- Not tattler, not criminal, not traitor (in any case, most of tests about it)
- Not active worker (problem with work ethic and ties with organization)
- Not talented worker (problem with strong horizontal connections)
But how many this kind of persons around? Let's make demographic slice. 30-50 years old mans about 12% of population. Less than half of them have good health and families with children, so 6% of population. Half of them has IQ>100 for further education, so 3%. Less than half of them have proper personality types for hierarchy and discipline to be silent, so 1.5%. Finally, 30% of them already vassals of other groups, so just 1% of population or 2% of active workforce.
Just 40 suitable persons in organization with 2000 personnel. Maybe 4-8 of them have some problems, which can be used to fortify loyalty and hierarchy. Bare minimum to create local group. This is why suite of vassals follows the knight to capture new organization. Only big and fully controlled organizations can generate new vassals in numbers. But full control mostly illusion, as been said before only 10% official positions can be controlled by one political clan, at least without damage to offensive operations.
Globalhomo parties have serious advantage, they can utilize women, losers without families, young adults, racial minorities. Almost any scum for vassal role. Or just to create local groups, destabilize situation and force other parties to use most of knights for defense. Fortunately zogdogs unstable, easily detectable and can't overpass even 25 years group lifespan. Jews uses this kind of troops as kamikaze bombers. Sometimes literally. If someone suggest vassalage to you, Ignore any possible globalhomo assets. They just want to exploit you to bomb some organization and drop with criminal history. Alas, honorable knights can exploit unsuitable person too. So, be careful, especially if you see ongoing war in your organization.
Knight spend decades to gather good team of vassals. Usually from 1 to 3 new persons per year (take a look at coordinator's schedule again, this means 1 hour/week attention from knight and 1 hour/month attention from suzerain). If 4-6 new vassals per year this is questionable, wherefrom such time? If more than 6 just drop this company immediately, this is 100% kamikaze group or criminals. Start of vassal career cost at least 400 manhours of knight and suzerain work (about million of dollars for USA, since equal money knight can obtain during 400 hours long operation), in addition 1-2 million of dollars for support, education, protection and intelligence during first 5 years, only then vassal began to create profit over expenditures considering risks.
Ronin works like knight, but utilize their own friends and relatives to make vassals. Local groups can be very attractive hirelings (keep in mind that suzerain spend about 100 millions dollars to raise knight with healthy subgroup) but qualities of "local militia" utterly mournful (less that 30% suitable vassals). If someone suggest some kind of vassalage and you don't know him at least 5 years with weekly/monthly contacts, this is not ronin, just ordinary puppet-maker.
When knight moves to seize new organization, he leaves unsuitable vassals behind. They still have some protection and support, but much less attention. We call them "trace". Group with 150 current members has 100-300 old members as trace. Some old organization just retiree houses. This is art of lordship to leave vassals at time, but maintain cheap and effective system to protect them. This system is called "bureaucracy" and "education".
>>395028
Suzerains are national elites, but not ruling elites. Ruling elite is dynasty of sovereign. Usually national parties has autocracy, and sovereign, as absolute ruler, extracts all excessive funds from lover levels to support weak branches and party's projects. Unlike globalhomo with their money printer national parties suffer from lack of funding, so unification is the only one way.
Vassal of national party can expect income level of 10% richest households. For USA, as country with 0.49 Gini coefficient and 75k medial households income this means about 150-250k dollars, up to 800k dollars for crucial positions. Knight accumulated 100-500 million dollars as property, funds and personnel assets (7% dividends, 7-35 millions per year). Suzerain with military background own about 0.5-1 billion (10% dividends, 50-100 millions yearly), suzerain with financial background own about 1-15 billions, but they are milk-cows and sovereign takes up to 90% income. Any national party has sectoral bank or sovereign wealth fund with 100-300 billions (10% dividends, 10-30 billions yearly). There is no real taxes for national parties, since they control the government. Instead of taxation sovereign creates bank or fund to optimize financial management. 7% dividends for independent knight means 1% capital expenditures for management (hired economists), 9-10% dividends for independent suzerain means 0.3-0.5% capital expenditures (accountant subgroup). 10% income for sovereign fund is just 0.1% capital expenditures. This is why most of political clans entrust their wealth to sovereign, and party can concentrate all financial resources for major projects without emission and foreign credits. The whole party control 0.7 trillion capital with 60 billions income (35% wealth and 20% income of 10 million population).
World capital 500 trillions dollars, GDP 200 trillions, but 3/5 of each new dollar just financial scum. Real things is maritime trade, oil and gas, basic productive industry (steel, construction, vehicles, etc), agriculture lands. Elites, representing 1% of population, own 40% of world capitals (200 trillions, 80 trillions real assets) and 20% of GDP (40 trillions overall, 15 trillions of real trade). Bankers trying to seize real assets by any cost, their financial capitals in peril. Globalhomo (as combination of financial, technological and media corporations) have share of 60 trillions mostly financial capitals, funds like Blackrock, but such enormous funds overall just black boxes to hide wealth from taxation, they are not so profitable (2 trillion income yearly). Jews uses their control over international financial communications (they are architects of SWIFT) to generate small, but reliable income, less than 5% of global maritime trade, 0.8 billion yearly. Finally, best generators of real income for national parties is not finances or industrial goods, but 3 trillions of world oil and gas trade, 1.5 trillions of food, 1 trillion of weapons and 0.7 trillion of pharmaceutical drugs. Energy is blood of civilization, food is the tool to control vulnerable countries, weapon and drugs just compact enough for air transportation and has negligible prime cost. Finally, small share of gold and jewels is compensator mechanism for trade between hostile factions.
Government of modern welfare state control about 30-45% of GDP. Most of national parties parasitize on this currents and extracts part of transactions, purchases, projects. From perspective of general public this is corruption, from perspective of parties just another kind of assets. There is no individual politics, shards or local groups inside the government, only potpourri of high level officials of various parties, but most of them are servants and just do their work. There is no place for ordinary vassals and knights. Horizontal connections between various parties are possible and sovereigns form some kind of oligarchic government. Security council in Russia, central committee in China, deep state in USA. Unlike low level political clans, who are just immune system, this assembly has capacity of expertise and strategical planning, at least for 5-10 years forward.
Important to understand that positions and income is not major resources of political party. Funds, organizations, vassals can be replaced with help of highest resources (agreements, secrets, connections). Parties can withstand tremendous damage on the lower levels of pyramid of resources and raise again after few years. And sometimes many times, again and again, to the last knight and last bastard of ruling class bloodline. Jews is perfect example, how irritating they can be. If you want to destroy enemy for sure, maim most of their children in elite schools, and then attack their agreements about international trade. But every single time, when ruling party was finally destroyed, after 10-20 years of chaos much more dangerous force was rising. USSR, Third Reich, modern Russia. Maybe slow corruption and replacement is better way to destroy enemy than direct attack.
Pyramid of resources:
Suzerains are national elites, but not ruling elites. Ruling elite is dynasty of sovereign. Usually national parties has autocracy, and sovereign, as absolute ruler, extracts all excessive funds from lover levels to support weak branches and party's projects. Unlike globalhomo with their money printer national parties suffer from lack of funding, so unification is the only one way.
Vassal of national party can expect income level of 10% richest households. For USA, as country with 0.49 Gini coefficient and 75k medial households income this means about 150-250k dollars, up to 800k dollars for crucial positions. Knight accumulated 100-500 million dollars as property, funds and personnel assets (7% dividends, 7-35 millions per year). Suzerain with military background own about 0.5-1 billion (10% dividends, 50-100 millions yearly), suzerain with financial background own about 1-15 billions, but they are milk-cows and sovereign takes up to 90% income. Any national party has sectoral bank or sovereign wealth fund with 100-300 billions (10% dividends, 10-30 billions yearly). There is no real taxes for national parties, since they control the government. Instead of taxation sovereign creates bank or fund to optimize financial management. 7% dividends for independent knight means 1% capital expenditures for management (hired economists), 9-10% dividends for independent suzerain means 0.3-0.5% capital expenditures (accountant subgroup). 10% income for sovereign fund is just 0.1% capital expenditures. This is why most of political clans entrust their wealth to sovereign, and party can concentrate all financial resources for major projects without emission and foreign credits. The whole party control 0.7 trillion capital with 60 billions income (35% wealth and 20% income of 10 million population).
World capital 500 trillions dollars, GDP 200 trillions, but 3/5 of each new dollar just financial scum. Real things is maritime trade, oil and gas, basic productive industry (steel, construction, vehicles, etc), agriculture lands. Elites, representing 1% of population, own 40% of world capitals (200 trillions, 80 trillions real assets) and 20% of GDP (40 trillions overall, 15 trillions of real trade). Bankers trying to seize real assets by any cost, their financial capitals in peril. Globalhomo (as combination of financial, technological and media corporations) have share of 60 trillions mostly financial capitals, funds like Blackrock, but such enormous funds overall just black boxes to hide wealth from taxation, they are not so profitable (2 trillion income yearly). Jews uses their control over international financial communications (they are architects of SWIFT) to generate small, but reliable income, less than 5% of global maritime trade, 0.8 billion yearly. Finally, best generators of real income for national parties is not finances or industrial goods, but 3 trillions of world oil and gas trade, 1.5 trillions of food, 1 trillion of weapons and 0.7 trillion of pharmaceutical drugs. Energy is blood of civilization, food is the tool to control vulnerable countries, weapon and drugs just compact enough for air transportation and has negligible prime cost. Finally, small share of gold and jewels is compensator mechanism for trade between hostile factions.
Government of modern welfare state control about 30-45% of GDP. Most of national parties parasitize on this currents and extracts part of transactions, purchases, projects. From perspective of general public this is corruption, from perspective of parties just another kind of assets. There is no individual politics, shards or local groups inside the government, only potpourri of high level officials of various parties, but most of them are servants and just do their work. There is no place for ordinary vassals and knights. Horizontal connections between various parties are possible and sovereigns form some kind of oligarchic government. Security council in Russia, central committee in China, deep state in USA. Unlike low level political clans, who are just immune system, this assembly has capacity of expertise and strategical planning, at least for 5-10 years forward.
Important to understand that positions and income is not major resources of political party. Funds, organizations, vassals can be replaced with help of highest resources (agreements, secrets, connections). Parties can withstand tremendous damage on the lower levels of pyramid of resources and raise again after few years. And sometimes many times, again and again, to the last knight and last bastard of ruling class bloodline. Jews is perfect example, how irritating they can be. If you want to destroy enemy for sure, maim most of their children in elite schools, and then attack their agreements about international trade. But every single time, when ruling party was finally destroyed, after 10-20 years of chaos much more dangerous force was rising. USSR, Third Reich, modern Russia. Maybe slow corruption and replacement is better way to destroy enemy than direct attack.
Pyramid of resources:
Type of power | Major resource | Personalities
--------------- | --------------------- | ------------------
Ruling elites | Bloodline, agreements | Sovereign
National elites | Confidence, secrets | Suzerain, knights
Observers | Loyalty, honesty | Vassals, squires
Organizations | Strategies, income | Servants, managers
Workers | Professions, families | Trace, scions
>>395028
20k party means 200-300k society with families and trace, 2-3% of population (but with predominant concentration in some regions for oldest parties, take a look at Mormons). Old religious parties is the best ones for vassalage, they guarantee merited retirement just for faith, but because of this they quite bad with wealth concentration, long trail, weak body. Globalhomo parties are just foreigners, they do not care about nation at all, you cannot see their trails, therefore they abandon most of their vassals. National parties somewhere in the middle. Overall parties tend to form casts and separate themselves from the nation.
Vassals with families much better than loners because of one thing. Usually group do not pay vassal directly (this kind of transactions too easy to detect), but transmit assets to one of his closest relatives. Small business, affordable house, better education, healthcare. Group help vassal to take position with proper salary, but from ordinary vassal's perspective this salary from organization, not from group! Vassal begin to get used to his position and just do not want to move further. In this case group left him in trace, which equivalent of 3+ million dollars loses, or motivate him through family.
Motivation methods:
- Dangers (revenge, enemy, punishment)
- Habits (information, law, esteem, example)
Power classification: ideology, pride, reward, coercion.
Dangers mostly for new members. Possibility of revenge is good initial motivation, visible enemy is major way to fortify hierarchy (rally around the flag), punishment through blame is possible if suzerain maintain image of fatherly figure. Habits is for old members and trace. Information bubble helps a lot to prevent leaks and miscommunication. Party laws (Sharia for example) helps a lot to separate members from distant relatives. Maintain esteem for sovereign's politics is major mission of party's media. Examples of correct family life is the way to erase harmful habits and separate members from nation even more. Ideology, is the stronger and most reliable power, but only minor slice of population take it seriously, especially when party fluctuate like a weathercock. Pride is the primary motivation, slogan "we are better than them" is the itch of major part of vassals. Reward is situational: party can offer 200k income, but Globalhomo ready to spend millions to buy everyone around during attack. Coercion or blackmailing destructive to loyalty, therefore can be used just once before retirement.
The cybernetic law of requisite variety is the paramount idea. The motivation must be various. If you use various methods you can economize resources for each one. National parties trying to create Patrimonialstaat for their members and concentrate all connections inside party to prevent leaks. First part is status rift: vassal must drop his previous friends, easiest way to achieve this is just send him to another city and give him higher income. Second part is separated housing estates when it possible. Third part is separate schools, medicine, church and justice for party members. Vertical family connections between vassals, knights and suzerain. Horizontal connections between all of them and retiree vassals and their families in trace. Educative and cheap solution to fill up Dunbar's number with relatively secure connections.
20k party means 200-300k society with families and trace, 2-3% of population (but with predominant concentration in some regions for oldest parties, take a look at Mormons). Old religious parties is the best ones for vassalage, they guarantee merited retirement just for faith, but because of this they quite bad with wealth concentration, long trail, weak body. Globalhomo parties are just foreigners, they do not care about nation at all, you cannot see their trails, therefore they abandon most of their vassals. National parties somewhere in the middle. Overall parties tend to form casts and separate themselves from the nation.
Vassals with families much better than loners because of one thing. Usually group do not pay vassal directly (this kind of transactions too easy to detect), but transmit assets to one of his closest relatives. Small business, affordable house, better education, healthcare. Group help vassal to take position with proper salary, but from ordinary vassal's perspective this salary from organization, not from group! Vassal begin to get used to his position and just do not want to move further. In this case group left him in trace, which equivalent of 3+ million dollars loses, or motivate him through family.
Motivation methods:
- Dangers (revenge, enemy, punishment)
- Habits (information, law, esteem, example)
Power classification: ideology, pride, reward, coercion.
Dangers mostly for new members. Possibility of revenge is good initial motivation, visible enemy is major way to fortify hierarchy (rally around the flag), punishment through blame is possible if suzerain maintain image of fatherly figure. Habits is for old members and trace. Information bubble helps a lot to prevent leaks and miscommunication. Party laws (Sharia for example) helps a lot to separate members from distant relatives. Maintain esteem for sovereign's politics is major mission of party's media. Examples of correct family life is the way to erase harmful habits and separate members from nation even more. Ideology, is the stronger and most reliable power, but only minor slice of population take it seriously, especially when party fluctuate like a weathercock. Pride is the primary motivation, slogan "we are better than them" is the itch of major part of vassals. Reward is situational: party can offer 200k income, but Globalhomo ready to spend millions to buy everyone around during attack. Coercion or blackmailing destructive to loyalty, therefore can be used just once before retirement.
The cybernetic law of requisite variety is the paramount idea. The motivation must be various. If you use various methods you can economize resources for each one. National parties trying to create Patrimonialstaat for their members and concentrate all connections inside party to prevent leaks. First part is status rift: vassal must drop his previous friends, easiest way to achieve this is just send him to another city and give him higher income. Second part is separated housing estates when it possible. Third part is separate schools, medicine, church and justice for party members. Vertical family connections between vassals, knights and suzerain. Horizontal connections between all of them and retiree vassals and their families in trace. Educative and cheap solution to fill up Dunbar's number with relatively secure connections.
>>395028
National parties have overwhelming inequality problem, even more noticeable than inside general population. Vassals and trace own about 15% of party wealth, which means 0.82 Gini coefficient in wealth inequality, compared to 0.73 in USA and 0.63 in Europe. Most of parties have various kind of basic income and social programs, but some military-focused parties uses stronger method. The basic inheritance. About 2% of party capitals equally redistributed to 25 years old age group, this means sovereign fund with 120 billions dollars capital, which routinely distributes 12 billions income among 4k scions, 3 million dollars to each one who finished military academy and created family. For that promised reward scions ready to be cadets and kill fucking everyone who threatening party in their most aggressive age. They form 7k officer corp and ready to be deployed into 100k professional army in less than year. And finally, 120 billion inviolable reserve is enough to arm and maintain such military force for two years.
The parties have vulnerabilities:
- Warrior stronger than priest.
- Priest stronger than merchant.
- Merchant stronger than warrior.
Media-based and religious parties vulnerable to militants, their leaders and internal structures too visible (just like their trace) and destructive power relatively weak, so there is possibility to just kill leaders and expel others. Financial-based parties perfectly hidden and too entwisted with national economy to be destroyed in short time, but vulnerable to constant attacks against image and can be replaced through decade or two. Military-based factions vulnerable to economy-based attack, there is no army without finances.
The Scions Strategy is the trump-card against economy-based attacks and possible nuke-level weapon against globalhomo and jews. They can't buy scions so easily as ordinary officers: spies inside scions army costs like full-sized gold statues. Of course humans still humans and betrayal of someone among thousands is just matter of time, and leaks is a thing, as you can see. Anyway, time will show. Maybe Tempestus Scions is endeavor 40k years ahead our civilization, maybe degradation to 19th century, or just temporary solution to the Pareto's problem.
So, 18-25 age, military background, war experience, early marriage, life with family in the trace's residential area, relatively small salary, promised inheritance. This is the key. Political clan with 150 members and 2 billion full capital can create 200 million fund and afford 30 scions (about 3 years to raise cadre squad). In the time of great need they can form full infantry battalion just because of their army connections. Western Europe do not have reliable army, but I talks about Ukrainians. Take care of them and they will take care of you.
National parties have overwhelming inequality problem, even more noticeable than inside general population. Vassals and trace own about 15% of party wealth, which means 0.82 Gini coefficient in wealth inequality, compared to 0.73 in USA and 0.63 in Europe. Most of parties have various kind of basic income and social programs, but some military-focused parties uses stronger method. The basic inheritance. About 2% of party capitals equally redistributed to 25 years old age group, this means sovereign fund with 120 billions dollars capital, which routinely distributes 12 billions income among 4k scions, 3 million dollars to each one who finished military academy and created family. For that promised reward scions ready to be cadets and kill fucking everyone who threatening party in their most aggressive age. They form 7k officer corp and ready to be deployed into 100k professional army in less than year. And finally, 120 billion inviolable reserve is enough to arm and maintain such military force for two years.
The parties have vulnerabilities:
- Warrior stronger than priest.
- Priest stronger than merchant.
- Merchant stronger than warrior.
Media-based and religious parties vulnerable to militants, their leaders and internal structures too visible (just like their trace) and destructive power relatively weak, so there is possibility to just kill leaders and expel others. Financial-based parties perfectly hidden and too entwisted with national economy to be destroyed in short time, but vulnerable to constant attacks against image and can be replaced through decade or two. Military-based factions vulnerable to economy-based attack, there is no army without finances.
The Scions Strategy is the trump-card against economy-based attacks and possible nuke-level weapon against globalhomo and jews. They can't buy scions so easily as ordinary officers: spies inside scions army costs like full-sized gold statues. Of course humans still humans and betrayal of someone among thousands is just matter of time, and leaks is a thing, as you can see. Anyway, time will show. Maybe Tempestus Scions is endeavor 40k years ahead our civilization, maybe degradation to 19th century, or just temporary solution to the Pareto's problem.
So, 18-25 age, military background, war experience, early marriage, life with family in the trace's residential area, relatively small salary, promised inheritance. This is the key. Political clan with 150 members and 2 billion full capital can create 200 million fund and afford 30 scions (about 3 years to raise cadre squad). In the time of great need they can form full infantry battalion just because of their army connections. Western Europe do not have reliable army, but I talks about Ukrainians. Take care of them and they will take care of you.
I think this is enough to soothe my conscience. Now I can just send friends to read this thread and maybe somewhere somehow things will be fine.
Cozy did nothing wrong.
Cozy did nothing wrong.
Cozy was right about everything.
>>399073
THIS says a lot about Equestria's immigration policy during the Twilight era... Let's hope she left ponies free association and doesn't force ponies to live with non-ponies, otherwise Equestria will end.
THIS says a lot about Equestria's immigration policy during the Twilight era... Let's hope she left ponies free association and doesn't force ponies to live with non-ponies, otherwise Equestria will end.
>>399090
>THIS says a lot about Equestria's immigration policy during the Twilight era...
What a disgrace.
>THIS says a lot about Equestria's immigration policy during the Twilight era...
What a disgrace.
Actually, this thread full of jewish trickery. My Cozy is right, but with wrong strategy we newer outjew the jew. But what about you, anon? Do you use the jewish trickery in your daily life?
>>399132
I think beating the jew at his own game can be done in the form of trolling. It is very fun.
I think beating the jew at his own game can be done in the form of trolling. It is very fun.
Cozy was a villian that neglected and harmed innocent cute pones out of selfishness, what the hell is wrong with you people?
>>399139
This is a radical pony who went against the obviously leftist Twilight movement. And that's all we internet autists need! Glory to Cozy, your work lives on!
This is a radical pony who went against the obviously leftist Twilight movement. And that's all we internet autists need! Glory to Cozy, your work lives on!
1759544325.png (962.5 KB, 1100x1400, my-little-pony-фэндомы-mlp-art-3979769.png)
Cozy was right about rich and common ponies. Cozy was right about methods. Cozy was right about price of freedom. Cozy was right about everything.
>>401115
Cozy wasn't "right about rich ponies" or "the cost of freedom". She only wanted to be rich and powerful herself, because she's a total queen.
Do not slander such a glorious ubelkleine fillyboss with your slave-morality mental gymnastics.
Cozy wasn't "right about rich ponies" or "the cost of freedom". She only wanted to be rich and powerful herself, because she's a total queen.
Do not slander such a glorious ubelkleine fillyboss with your slave-morality mental gymnastics.
31 replies | 24 files | 21 UUIDs | Archived