If you were to make a document that had an itemized list of your political beliefs with sources that brought you to such a conclusion, how would you structure it?
Personally I like the concept of Marx's base-superstructure dialectic: the economy influences culture, and culture influences the economy in a spiral with the economy being the dominant force of the two.
Practice: I'd make an HTML document with two sections in the <main>, one for the economy, one for culture stuff. I'd list my opinions regarding a certain aspect of the economy, sources, and cultural phenomenae I think that economic phenomena has effects on with anchored links to zoop on over to them. The latter half structured likewise, zooping back up to the former.
Is this a good plan? Is there anything this wouldn't adequitely cover?
>Why use something Marx came up with?
I was looking into Hegel and he's a significant contemporary of Hegel as one of the Young Hegelians, allong side Max Stirner and a few others.
It seems like a sensible model on it's own.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
4 replies | 4 files | 3 UUIDs | Page 3
1749168949_1.jpg (102.2 KB, 1079x1024, twilight-side-eye-glasses.jpg)
>>391743
Well part why I made the thread is I wanna hear alternatives and critiques of it before I commit to using such a structure for my outline.
It's gonna be a huge document that would be a pain in the ass to refactor if the outline is flawed.
Well part why I made the thread is I wanna hear alternatives and critiques of it before I commit to using such a structure for my outline.
It's gonna be a huge document that would be a pain in the ass to refactor if the outline is flawed.
>>391748 (me)
Found this: https://legalform.blog/2020/01/15/no-bases-no-superstructures-against-legal-economism-nate-holdren-and-rob-hunter/
I'll give it a read, but if anyone wants to add some reading material to the pile I can queue it up.
Found this: https://legalform.blog/2020/01/15/no-bases-no-superstructures-against-legal-economism-nate-holdren-and-rob-hunter/
I'll give it a read, but if anyone wants to add some reading material to the pile I can queue it up.
>>391721
The idea seems interesting, but I don't understand why reproduction wouldn't be a part of the base. Also I generally don't like Marx because Marxism pretends to be scientific, but there was never any expiremental evidence of dialectical materialism. It was just kind of assumed to be true.
The idea seems interesting, but I don't understand why reproduction wouldn't be a part of the base. Also I generally don't like Marx because Marxism pretends to be scientific, but there was never any expiremental evidence of dialectical materialism. It was just kind of assumed to be true.