how can we even be anarchocapitalists under any sort of government. how is it possible to even try when it’s impossible in the state. why does anyone have hope for this ideology. i really thought i got it when i was like 15 but there’s no point, even libertarians are getting fucked. there’s not enough of us to fuck up the govenment so why try
also why do we all draw her with dollars and not bits, she’s a horse people
also also please post her more here, makeshift ancap pone thread
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
20 replies | 8 files | 16 UUIDs | Page 3
>>389748
>why does anyone have hope for this ideology
Because it is a fallacy. It looks cool but it is not practical.
Ancap is suited for (((hustlers))) not for the common man. Also you have the issue of personal safety and having a gun might be not enough, then hiring a militia follows and it is 100% sure will end up in a war like the narco-cartels in Mexico.
>why does anyone have hope for this ideology
Because it is a fallacy. It looks cool but it is not practical.
Ancap is suited for (((hustlers))) not for the common man. Also you have the issue of personal safety and having a gun might be not enough, then hiring a militia follows and it is 100% sure will end up in a war like the narco-cartels in Mexico.
>>389752
why do we even care about extremist ideals if the government is so cucked by the moderates. i used to get off to ayn rand and still love objectivist ideas but why even try. we will never really see any of these in our goverment
why do we even care about extremist ideals if the government is so cucked by the moderates. i used to get off to ayn rand and still love objectivist ideas but why even try. we will never really see any of these in our goverment
>>389812
>the government is so cucked by the moderates
>moderates
This is over the top gaslighting and an inversion of reality.
You live in the 1984 novel, for real.
>the government is so cucked by the moderates
>moderates
This is over the top gaslighting and an inversion of reality.
You live in the 1984 novel, for real.
>>389748
If you reach for the stars, you may not get one, but you won't end up with a handful of shit either.
If you reach for the stars, you may not get one, but you won't end up with a handful of shit either.
>>389836
If there is anything a non-conformist hates more than a conformist, it is a non-conformist who refuses to conform to the prevailing standards of non-conformity.
If there is anything a non-conformist hates more than a conformist, it is a non-conformist who refuses to conform to the prevailing standards of non-conformity.
>>389748
>what's the point of terrorism
You're from tel aviv aren't you
You will never guess if I cheered on Brenton tarrant, you'll never fund out
>what's the point of terrorism
You're from tel aviv aren't you
You will never guess if I cheered on Brenton tarrant, you'll never fund out
>>389751
If you could breed a slave race, you could breed a population suitable for ancap. With the right genetics and technology, ancap could naturally evolve, and be sustained.
I recon ancap will be the ultimate direction human societies travel towards. But I expect (due to dysgenic cycle of civilization) it’ll take many thousands of years.
If you could breed a slave race, you could breed a population suitable for ancap. With the right genetics and technology, ancap could naturally evolve, and be sustained.
I recon ancap will be the ultimate direction human societies travel towards. But I expect (due to dysgenic cycle of civilization) it’ll take many thousands of years.
>>389841
>If you could breed a slave race, you could breed a population suitable for ancap.
It's the opposite, it's the most high-trust, intelligent, hierarchical, individualistic populations that are most suited to create and maintain a legal-social order based in property and personal rights and responsibilities. This is why Anglo-Saxons and their biological and geographical neighbors, such as in France, were so influential in developing the liberal ideals which would form the basis of ancap (see John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, Frederic Bastiat, Gustave de Molinari), and why they enjoyed so much of the success of liberal capitalism. Of course, these same liberal ideals, such as individualism and rule of law, were exploited when groups who didn't share them were let in. The Hoppean/paleolibertarian/national-libertarian trends within ancap are a reaction to this fact, coming to terms with the need to limit individualism and have a degree of tribalism and standards of behavior if you want to keep a society which aligns with libertarian ethics.
>If you could breed a slave race, you could breed a population suitable for ancap.
It's the opposite, it's the most high-trust, intelligent, hierarchical, individualistic populations that are most suited to create and maintain a legal-social order based in property and personal rights and responsibilities. This is why Anglo-Saxons and their biological and geographical neighbors, such as in France, were so influential in developing the liberal ideals which would form the basis of ancap (see John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, Frederic Bastiat, Gustave de Molinari), and why they enjoyed so much of the success of liberal capitalism. Of course, these same liberal ideals, such as individualism and rule of law, were exploited when groups who didn't share them were let in. The Hoppean/paleolibertarian/national-libertarian trends within ancap are a reaction to this fact, coming to terms with the need to limit individualism and have a degree of tribalism and standards of behavior if you want to keep a society which aligns with libertarian ethics.
>>389889
not that Anon, but the anglos and french where the only two global powers to exert individuality towards the inhabitants of their colonial progeny.
And it makes even more sense when you notice the only ones who adopted that way of life were predominantly of western European origin.
America, Canada with Quebec, Australia and New Zealand.
All of the francophone countries in Africa and South Asia are defacto dictatorships with very low societal trust.
not that Anon, but the anglos and french where the only two global powers to exert individuality towards the inhabitants of their colonial progeny.
And it makes even more sense when you notice the only ones who adopted that way of life were predominantly of western European origin.
America, Canada with Quebec, Australia and New Zealand.
All of the francophone countries in Africa and South Asia are defacto dictatorships with very low societal trust.
>>389889
>Of course, these same liberal ideals, such as individualism and rule of law, were exploited when groups who didn't share them were let in.
This would probably be why.
>Of course, these same liberal ideals, such as individualism and rule of law, were exploited when groups who didn't share them were let in.
This would probably be why.
>>390193
Sometimes it is, but sometimes it is just the result of purity spiralling to the point of retardation. Look at communists or flat earthers.
Sometimes it is, but sometimes it is just the result of purity spiralling to the point of retardation. Look at communists or flat earthers.
>>390198
>communists
You can't deny that retarded convictions are still convictions, but I get your point. Having strong beliefs on something doesn't necessarily mean you're right, and I would definitely push a soft-skinned neocon and a temperature-IQ commie off the same helicopter.
>or flat earthers
I'd go out with these dudes for a pint tbh.
>>390218
Extremely based.
>communists
You can't deny that retarded convictions are still convictions, but I get your point. Having strong beliefs on something doesn't necessarily mean you're right, and I would definitely push a soft-skinned neocon and a temperature-IQ commie off the same helicopter.
>or flat earthers
I'd go out with these dudes for a pint tbh.
>>390218
Extremely based.
>>389751
I agree. It will result in war. Hatred, nepotism, cronyism...all the same. The government as it is now and how people suffer under it. Sates my antipathy.
Moreover
>then hiring a militia follows and it is 100% sure will end up in a war like the narco-cartels in Mexico.
Those beaners can die. Makes me wanna kill some random beaner on the street thinking about them. (Cuz 1/3 beaners have some kind of tie to them.
I agree. It will result in war. Hatred, nepotism, cronyism...all the same. The government as it is now and how people suffer under it. Sates my antipathy.
Moreover
>then hiring a militia follows and it is 100% sure will end up in a war like the narco-cartels in Mexico.
Those beaners can die. Makes me wanna kill some random beaner on the street thinking about them. (Cuz 1/3 beaners have some kind of tie to them.
>>390241
>You can't deny that retarded convictions are still convictions
True, but this doesn't touch on the purity spiralling element. Look at how often communities splinter and have sectarian fueds over who is the most ideologically pure. NatSocs also pull this shit and I expect it will only become more common on the rest of the far right as the overton window shifts and more normies turn. You can already see this with some of the schizo retards on the rest of the right. You can literally agree with them on 99% of their policy choices (White only immigration, remove kikes, end feminism, ect) but if you don't believe this or that conspiracy they view you as disloyal. At that point it isn't about convictions it's about proving to other how moral and just you are. Just like the marxists.
>You can't deny that retarded convictions are still convictions
True, but this doesn't touch on the purity spiralling element. Look at how often communities splinter and have sectarian fueds over who is the most ideologically pure. NatSocs also pull this shit and I expect it will only become more common on the rest of the far right as the overton window shifts and more normies turn. You can already see this with some of the schizo retards on the rest of the right. You can literally agree with them on 99% of their policy choices (White only immigration, remove kikes, end feminism, ect) but if you don't believe this or that conspiracy they view you as disloyal. At that point it isn't about convictions it's about proving to other how moral and just you are. Just like the marxists.
[View All] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
20 replies | 8 files | 16 UUIDs | Page 3
[Add to Thread Watcher]